Economic impact of the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake. GEN and Transport Knowledge Hub Event, March 30, Wellington Dr Garry McDonald and Dr Nicola Smith

Similar documents
An evaluation of the responses to the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake. Vivienne Ivory, Opus Research, Opus International Consultants Ltd

South Island Alpine Fault Earthquake Response Plan (SAFER) National Lifelines Conference Dr Caroline Orchiston, University of Otago

WELLINGTON $422 MILLION $614 MILLION $83 MILLION 22% SPEND $1.9 BILLION

Tim Hunter Christchurch & Canterbury Tourism Steve Clarke Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) Disaster & Rebuild 16 January 2015

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Tim Hunter Chief Executive. CCT Business Partner Update 3 March 2015

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Regional summary - Wellington

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

$244 $45 OVERVIEW National Land Transport Programme Bay of Plenty BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL SUMMARY

Annual Business Plan 2017/2018

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Regional Land Transport Plan JUNE 2016

West Somerset 2015 Local data version

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

The contribution of Tourism to the Greek economy in 2017

Australia & New Zealand

CRUISE TOURISM S CONTRIBUTION TO THE NEW ZEALAND ECONOMY 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas Analysis

Auckland Transport Quarterly Indicators Report 2018/19

Australia & New Zealand

The Economic Impact of Poole s Visitor Economy 2015

The Economic Impact of Travel in Kansas. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2010

Manawatu District Economic Profile

Appraisal of Factors Influencing Public Transport Patronage in New Zealand

The Economic Impact of the 2015 ASICS Los Angeles Marathon. September 2015

Wellington $312 $49 $456 OVERVIEW WELLINGTON REGIONAL SUMMARY

Foregone Economic Benefits from Airport Capacity Constraints in EU 28 in 2035

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

RE: PROPOSED STRATEGIC ALLIANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND AND SINGAPORE AIRLINES

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016

VISITOR ECONOMY STRATEGY

ROTORUA REGIONAL AIRPORT

Queenstown Lakes District Council. Review of District Plan Business Zones Capacity and Development of Zoning Hierarchy

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

November Christchurch and Canterbury Quarterly. Economic Report CHRISTCHURCH AND CANTERBURY QUARTERLY ECONOMIC REPORT

Transport Indicators Report June 2018

CentrePort Shipping Channel Deepening Project

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2017

Air China Limited Annual Results. March Under IFRS

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas


Industry Consultation Day 21 st April Tim Hunter Chief Executive

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 50, No. 2, June 2017


AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

The Civil Aviation Sector as a Driver for Economic Growth in Egypt

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2018

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin. July 2013

Air transport creates large returns for national economies but returns for airlines are unsustainably weak

Financial Costs and Benefits of International Tourism Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment

Unravelling regional insight

Community vulnerability in tropical coastal zones: tsunamis and cyclone storm surges. David King Centre for Disaster Studies James Cook University

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Dover Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Auckland Transport - Transport Indicators Report June 2013

Air passenger travel projection models. Haobo Wang, Ministry of Transport

Project Manager: Neil Beckett. Prepared by: Gerald Wen. Reviewed by: Neil Beckett. Approved for issue by: Neil Beckett

The Economic Impact of Travel in Minnesota Analysis

Commercial Accommodation Monitor: October 2017

Commercial Accommodation Monitor: December 2017

6 Road infrastructure

Queensland Economic Update

Conventions & business events Grow market share of business events from 9% to 10%

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County. July 2017

PERFORMANCE MEASURE INFORMATION SHEET #16

Regional Economic Report July- September 2014

Queenstown aerodrome price proposal for night operations and building upgrade. For aircraft over five tonnes

Commercial Accommodation Monitor: April 2017

The Economic Contribution of Cruise Tourism to the Southeast Asia Region in Prepared for: CLIA SE Asia. September 2015

Self Catering Holidays in England Economic Impact 2015

Economic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island

Waikato Regional Economic Development Strategy

Auckland Port and the Unitary Plan Dr Douglas Fairgray

The Outlook for the Residential Construction Industry Hunter and the Central Coast

The Economic Impact of Tourism West Oxfordshire Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

CHRISTCHURCH AND CANTERBURY QUARTERLY ECONOMIC REPORT SEPTEMBER 2014 QUARTER

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2014

Cycling as part of the NZ transport system

Measuring travel services and tourism in New Zealand. October 2013

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2016

Southern Cross University Tim Sutton Don Fuller Simon J. Wilde Southern Cross University Stephen Mason Southern Cross University

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM. Raleigh, North Carolina

Air travel projections for the Transport Outlook An overview. Haobo Wang, Ministry of Transport

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County, June 2018

Convention Centre Proposal. Have your say before we make a final decision later this year.

JUNE 2017 AUCKLAND ECONOMIC INSIGHTS SERIES ENGAGING GLOBALLY AUCKLAND S TRADING LINKAGES. aucklandnz.com/business nzier.org.nz

Travel & Tourism Sector Ranking United Kingdom. Summary of Findings, November 2013

$960 $1,175 $91 OVERVIEW National Land Transport Programme Auckland AUCKLAND REGIONAL SUMMARY

Transcription:

Economic impact of the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake GEN and Transport Knowledge Hub Event, March 30, Wellington Dr Garry McDonald and Dr Nicola Smith

Kaikōura earthquake 14 Nov 2012 @ 12.02am Magnitude 7.8 @ depth of 15kms Multi-fault rupture event Tsunami at Goose Bay 6.9m±0.3m 2 deaths, by Feb 2017 $900 million of insurance claims Source: GeoNet Source: USGS Source: cathnews.co.nz

Outline Scope of work, timeline Measuring the Economics of Resilient Infrastructure Tool (MERIT) MERIT modelling and results Transport Business operability Tourism Bringing it all together Rebuild workforce Research agenda Source: dailymail.co.uk

Scope of work Rapid assessment of the economic impacts as part of the wider information response to support decisionmaking Understand the scale and extent of the Kaikōura event and impacts of response options Key focus on transport (road, rail, port), business operation (all industries), tourism (domestic, international), wider flow-on impacts Separate analysis of rebuild workforce requirements

Timeline 14 16 Nov Discussions with government (MoT, MBIE, NZTA)/research community 17 Nov 7 Dec Govt A3 factsheets (People, Networks, Freight, Port, Fiscal etc) Research Info sharing portal (Riskscape, Geotech, Landslides etc) 8 Dec Economic impact assessment work begins 40 hours 12 Dec 1 st A3 infosheets : transport, business operability, tourism, wider flow-on impacts, rebuild workforce (update to Ministers) 20 Dec 2 nd A3 infosheets & draft report: transport, business operability, tourism, wider flow-on impacts, rebuild workforce (update to Ministers) 27 Jan Final report including options analysis (60pp) (update to Ministers)

What is MERIT? Computer simulation model for assessing the economic impacts of disruption events 3 versions: inoperability (<1 wk), two-region (>1 wk), Auckland spatially explicit model Multi-regional covering 16 regions Daily time steps over 20 years Multi-agent including 70+ businesses/industries, households, government, investors, trade by 70+ commodities Reports direct, flow-on/cascading impacts (value added, income, employment and other indicators) Based on general equilibrium theory, adapted for business disruption response and equilibrium-seeking dynamics

Where is MERIT being applied? Single infrastructure disruptions Electricity (Vector, Transpower), Port (Lyttelton), Road (MoT, NZTA Transport MERIT Online ) Water (WaterCare, Wellington Water) Natural hazard event disruptions Alpine Fault (MCDEM) Auckland Volcanic Field (AC, AELG) Kaikōura (MoT/MBIE/NZTA) Wellington Fault (GW, WELG, etc) Currently being developed under the QuakeCoRE, Resilience NSC and through commercial contracts

General modelling process

NZ$2007m pa How does MERIT work? Direct impacts e.g. operability Outage maps & Impacted business MERIT flow-on impacts Reporting Sector Output - Auckland 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 8 8.25 8.50 8.75 9 Time Manufacturing Services Primary

Kaikōura modelling process Direct impacts estimated by MERIT sub-modules transport business behaviours tourism These transform event information (e.g. road closures, building closures) into MERIT input parameters MERIT then estimates wider flow-on effects for economy Reporting is net of established counterfactual Rebuild workforce requirements estimated using MBIE/ME s National Construction Occupations Model

Transport (background) Transport networks significantly impacted SH1 and rail line connecting upper North Island and Chch Kaikōura township isolated Container shipping from Centreport Transport analysis concentrated on quantifying the increased freight costs Accessibility issues for tourism operators covered by business inoperability and tourism modules Other potential impacts Loss of value of perishable goods due to time delays Supply-chain interruptions

Transport (info. & assumptions) Route Status for Disrupted SH Network, as supplied by NZTA on 23 Jan 17 State Highway Status as at 14-Nov-16 21-Nov-16 19-Dec-16 21-Dec-16 28-Feb-17 30-Apr-17 31-May-17 31-Jul-17 31-Oct-18 Waiau to Kaikoura (Inland Route) Options 1&2 closed closed Option 3 closed closed road open - functional road open - functional road open - functional road open - functional open open open open open road open - functional open open open open SH1 North of Kaikoura Options 1&2 closed closed closed closed closed closed road open - functional open Option 3 closed closed closed closed closed closed closed road open - functional SH1 South of Kaikoura Options 1&2 closed closed closed road open - road open - road open - road open - functional functional functional functional open Option 3 closed closed closed road open - functional road open - functional road open - functional road open - functional road open - functional Railways Main line north estimated to carry 1.12m tonnes all assumed to be freighted by road Centreport Disruption of 9 months (Options 1&2) and 2 years (Option 3) containers rerouted through other ports (mainly Tauranga, Auckland) Coastal shipping Assumed to be analogous to road, applied road freight margins open open open open

Transport (modelling) * Refer to NZTA s Transport-MERIT Online

Business operability (background) MERIT s Business Behaviours Model (Brown et al., 2015) calculates business operability operability = proportion of as normal production that can be maintained (0-100%) impacted by disruption sources from infrastructure (water, sewage, electricity, gas, phone, fuel) and non-infrastructure (premises, neighbourhood, staff) key theme is that businesses are adaptive, but the more severe the disruption the slower the recovery BBM based on data collected from survey of Canterbury businesses following Canterbury quakes

Business operability (info. & assumptions) Infrastructure Outage by Location (excl. road, rail, port) Area Geospatial definition Electricity (Days of Outage) Water (Days of Outage) Sewerage (Days of Outage) Stormwater (Days of Outage) Kaikoura Urban Area 8 4 5 2 11 3 11 1 Hanmer Springs Urban Area 1 5 0 5 0 0 Waiau Area Unit 2 6 1 5 0 0 Waiau - Rural Area Unit 2 6 12 7 0 0 Culverden Area Unit 1 6 0 5 0 0 Cheviot Area Unit 1 6 0 5 0 0 Ward Area Unit 5 9,4 14 8 14 8 14 1 Seddon Area Unit 3 10 3 10 0 0 Blenheim Urban Area 0 0 0 0 Picton Urban Area 0 0 0 0 Nelson Urban Area 0 0 0 0 Wellington Urban Area 0 0 0 0 Lower Hutt Urban Area 1 11 0 0 0 NB: Footnotes as per final report Adjustments to BBM model required for: (1) Centreport and KiwiRail operations (2) Whale-watching (3) Other Kaikōura tourism businesses (4) Wine manufacturing (5) Wellington building closures

1 week 7 weeks 3 months 6 months 12 months Pre-quake Value Ad ($2016mil/yr) 1 week 7 weeks 3 months 6 months 12 months Pre-quake Value Ad ($2016mil/yr) Impacts of Kaikōura Quake on Business Operability Kaikoura District Hurunui District % Loss to Business Operability % Loss to Business Operability Industry 1 Agriculture 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 211 2 Other primary 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 25 3 Food manufacturing 19% 8% 4% 0% 0% 0 19% 8% 4% 0% 0% 59 4 Wood and paper manufacturing 23% 9% 5% 0% 0% 2 11% 5% 2% 0% 0% 1 5 Other manufacturing 19% 8% 4% 0% 0% 2 15% 6% 3% 0% 0% 8 6 Utilities, construction & transport 34% 26% 5% 0% 0% 39 14% 6% 3% 0% 0% 76 7 Trade and hospitality 75% 37% 36% 35% 0% 27 14% 6% 3% 0% 0% 46 8 Finance, insurance, real estate & prof. servs 26% 11% 6% 0% 0% 19 16% 6% 3% 0% 0% 110 9 Government, education & health services 20% 8% 4% 0% 0% 9 12% 5% 2% 0% 0% 29 10 Other services 37% 17% 14% 11% 0% 7 18% 7% 4% 0% 0% 44 Marlborough District Wellington Region 1 Agriculture 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 196 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 221 2 Other primary 3% 1% 1% 0% 0% 128 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 81 3 Food manufacturing 17% 7% 4% 0% 0% 419 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 971 4 Wood and paper manufacturing 16% 6% 3% 0% 0% 9 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 111 5 Other manufacturing 10% 4% 2% 0% 0% 79 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1,502 6 Utilities, construction & transport 11% 5% 3% 1% 1% 252 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4,030 7 Trade and hospitality 10% 4% 2% 0% 0% 239 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2,745 8 Finance, insurance, real estate & prof. servs 8% 3% 1% 0% 0% 494 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11,552 9 Government, education & health services 9% 3% 2% 0% 0% 227 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 6,862 10 Other services 9% 3% 2% 0% 0% 217 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1,303

Tourism (background) Growth in both domestic and international tourism markets has been strong (up 15% and 6% for year ending Oct 2016) For last weeks of November and December, we estimated changes in tourism expenditure Required comparing actual spend with predicted spend Key data are EFTPOS and credit card transactions & MBIE Monthly Regional Tourism Expenditure Also needed to develop assumptions of tourism expenditure impacts into the future for MERIT

Estimated Impacts of Quake on Tourism Expenditure by Selected Regions Region North Canterbury Marlborough RTO Nelson Tasman RTO West Coast RTO Rest of South Island Wellington RTO Rest of North Island Total New Zealand Month (2016) Domestic Impact ($ 2016 NZ million) Impact (%) International Impact ($ 2016 NZ million) Impact (%) November -3 (-2.1,-4.3) -18% -5 (-4.6,-5.9) -40% December -8 (-6.6,-9.1) -35% -12 (-11.4,-13.3) -63% Total -11 (-8.7,-13.4) -28% -18 (-16,-19.2) -54% November -2 (-0.9,-3.3) -11% -1 (0.1,-1.9) -6% December -4 (-2.9,-5.9) -16% -2 (-1,-3.5) -11% Total -6 (-3.8,-9.2) -14% -3 (-1,-5.4) -9% November -2 (-0.2,-4.7) -8% 4 (5.6,2.9) 21% December -6 (-3.9,-9) -13% 4 (6.4,2.1) 13% Total -9 (-4.1,-13.7) -11% 9 (11.9,5) 16% November -1 (0.3,-2.7) -8% -1 (1.3,-2.5) -2% December -1 (1.1,-2.6) -3% -4 (-1.3,-6.1) -9% Total -2 (1.3,-5.3) -5% -4 (0,-8.6) -6% November -5 (-0.4,-10.3) -4% 17 (29,4) 8% December -16 (-10.2,-22.3) -9% 2 (22.4,-19.5) 1% Total -22 (-10.6,-32.6) -7% 19 (51.4,-15.5) 4% November -23 (-16.5,-29.1) -19% -3 (1,-7.8) -5% December -14 (-7.2,-19.9) -11% -1 (4.2,-6.9) -2% Total -36 (-23.8,-49) -15% -5 (5.2,-14.7) -3% November -31 (-9.6,-52.6) -4% 51 (80.2,20.5) 10% December -70 (-44.5,-95.5) -7% 66 (106.9,23.7) 10% Total -101 (-54.1,-148.1) -6% 117 (187.1,44.2) 10% November -73 (-30,-117.6) -6% 62 (117.9,4.1) 6% December -129 (-78.5,-180.2) -8% 51 (131.7,-34.4) 4% Total -202 (-108.5,-297.7) -7% 113 (249.6,-30.2) 5%

Tourism (info. & assumptions) Based on Tourism analysis we assumed for MERIT: International Tourism Expenditure (Canterbury) 11.5-12.7% loss to end of December 1.5% loss until road fully opens International Tourism Expenditure (Rest of NZ) 9% gain for first 1-2 weeks 3% gain December Rest of period, losses in Canterbury are gains for rest of NZ No attempt to change domestic tourism expenditures in MERIT (further development of tourism module required)

Bringing it all together in MERIT MERIT

Bringing it all together in MERIT Impacts on Gross Domestic Product/Value Added Regional Results 0-12 months Time Period After Event Total 12-24 Total (0-24 months (0-24 months) months) % change from ($ 2016 m) YE March 2016 0-12 months Time Period After Event Total 12-24 Total (0-24 months (0-24 months) months) % change from ($ 2016 m) YE March 2016 Total New Zealand 241,200-402 -62-465 -0.1% -418-95 -513-0.1% Canterbury 32,900-107 -10-117 -0.2% -117-20 -137-0.2% Rest of New Zealand 208,300-295 -53-348 -0.1% -301-75 -376-0.1% Industry Results Baseline GDP ($ 2016 m) OPTIONS 1&2 Estimated change in GDP Estimated change in Value Added ($ 2016 m) % contribution to GDP loss Estimated change in Value Added ($ 2016 m) OPTION 3 Estimated change in GDP % contribution to GDP loss All industries -382-57 -439 94% -396-91 -488 95% Agriculture 10,500-21 -9-31 7% -28-16 -43 8% Other primary 5,200-36 -7-43 9% -44-14 -57 11% Food manufacturing 9,500-115 -4-119 26% -139-28 -168 33% Wood and paper manufacturing 2,100-37 -2-39 8% -55-17 -72 14% Other manufacturing 14,400-86 2-84 18% -112-12 -124 24% Utilities, construction & transport 31,900 174-75 98-21% 286-33 253-49% Trade and hospitality 27,300-36 4-32 7% -42 2-41 8% Government, education & health services 35,000-87 22-65 14% -106 18-88 17% Other services 87,600-140 13-126 27% -156 9-148 29%

Bringing it all together in MERIT Estimated Contributions of Transport, Business Operability and Tourism to Total Impacts GDP impacts by component 0-12 months Time Period After Event Total 12-24 Total (0-24 months (0-24 months) months) Share of GDP impacts (%) 0-12 months Time Period After Event Total 12-24 Total (0-24 months (0-24 months) months) Share of GDP impacts (%) Transport - all New Zealand -151-58 -209 45% -167-97 -263 51% Canterbury -39-11 -50 43% -45-23 -68 49% Rest of New Zealand -112-47 -159 46% -121-74 -196 52% Business operability 1 - all NZ -274-3 -277 60% -279 1-278 54% Canterbury -52 1-51 44% -57 1-56 41% Rest of New Zealand -222-4 -226 65% -222 1-222 59% Tourism - all New Zealand 19 1 19-4% 19 1 20-4% Canterbury -17 1-16 14% -21 1-20 14% Rest of New Zealand 36-1 35-10% 40-1 40-11% Notes: 1. This includes supply-side impacts on tourism businesses OPTIONS 1&2 OPTION 3 Estimated GDP impacts ($ 2016 m) Estimated GDP impacts ($ 2016 m)

Rebuild workforce Workforce estimates based on National Construction Occupations Model Uses input data of construction investment (residential, non-residential, civil engineering) Applies a multi-regional input-output model to estimate direct, indirect and induced labour force requirements Model outputs are employment by 1022 occupation groupings Direct reinstatement costs were extracted from RiskScape model Estimates scaled upwards to match rebuild cost estimates provided by Reserve Bank

Rebuild workforce Construction Workforce Requirements (All Occupations, MEC years) by region Canterbury Region Rest of New Zealand Total New Zealand Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Option 1 Residential 200 200 600 600 800 800 Non-residential 300 300 3,500 3,500 3,800 3,700 Heavy and civil engineering 16,300 0 1,400 0 17,700 0 Total 16,800 500 5,400 4,000 22,300 4,500 Option 2 Residential 1,200 1,200 2,800 2,800 3,900 3,900 Non-residential 1,300 1,300 17,500 17,400 18,800 18,700 Heavy and civil engineering 24,500 0 2,100 0 26,600 0 Total 27,000 2,500 22,300 20,200 49,300 22,600 Option 3 Residential 400 800 800 400 600 1,100 1,100 500 1,300 2,600 2,600 1,300 Non-residential 400 900 900 400 900 1,800 1,800 900 6,300 12,500 12,400 6,200 Heavy and civil engineering 12,300 12,200 0 0 500 500 0 0 13,300 13,300 0 0 Total 13,100 13,900 1,600 800 1,900 3,300 2,900 1,400 20,900 28,300 15,000 7,500 MEC = Modified Employee Counts

Research agenda Displacement of Wellington workers Govt provisioning of services (SNZ, Archives, NZDF, GW), loss of productivity Business vulnerability aligned with government activities Particularly primary sector industry associations, head/national offices Coastal shipping dynamics Temporary re-emergence of coastal shipping; NZ Connect (KiwiRail, PoA, LPC & ANL Shipping), Mainfreight Port alternatives (eg. for RORO ferries), re-routing, freight handling, no. of berths, storage Just-in-time practices vs pricing what are the pinch-points? Role in rebuild and recovery

Research agenda Freight price dynamics Uncertainty lead to significant fluctuations in freight pricing over first month Speculation/opportunism vs realistic operational cost increases? What are the decision-making dynamics for freight pricing? Stockpiled and perishable goods Built structure failure and road disruption placed perishable stockpiled goods (wine, raw milk) at risk Need for primary sector resilience/disruption planning

Research agenda Economic of fear Prof Adam Rose on 9-11, up to half of economic impacts caused by fear Media, portrayal of impacts domestically, internationally (eg. Australian tourism market post Canterbury quakes) Information provisioning Openness and sharing of data between government and research community, different processes adopted possibly a richer picture with more collaboration IRD data protocols need to be established prior to an event for information release enabling risk identification, modelling calibration, learning on business adaptation and response

More information Economics of Resilient Infrastructure:- https://www.naturalhazards.org.nz/nhrp/hazard -themes/societal-resilience/eori Resilience National Science Challenge:- https://resiliencechallenge.nz/ (Annual forum tomorrow at Te Papa!) Transport-MERIT Online:- https://exchange.iseesystems.com/public/garrymcdonald/dem/index.html#page1 YouTube clip on Transport-MERIT:- https://youtu.be/irvd3pvzhhy

Questions