SMART STATIONS IN SMART CITIES 6 th International Conference on Railway Stations Madrid, OCTOBER 2017

Similar documents
National Fact Sheet: FY 2008

Amtrak Product Training

The Northeast Corridor: Challenges and Opportunities for the Region s Future. Mitch Warren, Executive Director, Northeast Corridor Commission

Amtrak s Economic Contribution

Berkshire Flyer Working Group. January 30, 2018

RELATED SANTA CLARA SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA. RELATED SANTA CLARA Santa Clara, CA

Company Profile (FY 2017)

National Fact Sheet FY 2016

The Berkshire Flyer. Connecting Pittsfield and NYC through Seamless Transit

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

AMERICA S RAILROAD TO HIGH ADVENTURE BASES 2017 PRICING

Federal Railroad Administration Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study

Northwest Corridor Transit Study

Public Meeting. December 19 th, 2018

Amtrak International Operations to Canada. Eastern Border Transportation Coalition May 25, 2011

Transit Fare Review Phase 2 Discussion Guide

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs CTAA Expo June 2014

Report of the Executive

Airport analyses informing new mobility shifts: Opportunities to adapt energyefficient mobility services and infrastructure

Federal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation December 2004

Long Distance Service: Preparing for the Future. Emmett Fremaux Chicago, IL March 6, 2010

Berkshire Flyer Working Group. February 13, 2018

General Issues Committee Item Transit Operating Budget Ten Year Local Transit Strategy

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

Community Feedback and Survey Participation Topic: ACCESS Paratransit Services

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

METROPOLITAN EVANSVILLE TRANSIT SYSTEM Part I: Comprehensive Operations Analysis Overview July 9 th, 2015 Public Information Meeting

TRAVEL POLICY FOR THE U.S. SCIENCE SUPPORT PROGRAM OFFICE (USSSP)

SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

City of Sacramento Sacramento Intermodal Transportation Facility Draft WP # 3 Transit Operational Requirements

These elements are designed to make service more convenient, connected, and memorable.

TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS

DAILY TRIPS (LOOP) Monday-Friday 6:55 AM to 6:20 PM 60/60/ 11 Saturday 7:55 AM to 5:55 PM 60/ 10 Sunday

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

I-95/395 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes Project Overview

Sample enumeration model for airport ground access

2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report. Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised

1 SUBWAY EXTENSION TO VAUGHAN CORPORATE CENTRE - OPERATING AGREEMENT UPDATE

Chapel Hill Transit: Short Range Transit Plan. Preferred Alternative DRAFT

3. Proposed Midwest Regional Rail System

Air Service Development Information Report and Proposed 2015 Annual Air Service Plan

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

Reimbursement Guidelines Overview

ALL ABOARD LABOR S LONG TERM PASSENGER TRANSPORT STRATEGY

Technology Solutions: Improving Service Connecting the System

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

Bristol Virginia Transit

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

Word Count: 3,565 Number of Tables: 4 Number of Figures: 6 Number of Photographs: 0. Word Limit: 7,500 Tables/Figures Word Count = 2,250

If you are searched for a book North East by Rail in pdf format, then you have come on to the faithful site. We furnish the utter option of this book

Tri-Rail Coastal Link and Downtown Miami Link. Miami-Dade County Black Affairs Advisory Board February 3, 2016

Federal Budget Submission. Prepared for the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance. Greater Toronto Airports Authority

Ground Transportation Strategy. Victoria Airport Authority

NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE ASA QUARTERLY REPORT FIRST QUARTER 2004 [This document is a translation from the original Norwegian version]

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

Creating Sustainable Communities Through Public Transportation

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

Service Change Plan Cowichan Valley Regional Transit System July 2018 Expansion. Prepared by

FirstGroup plc South Western

AMERICA S LEADING AIRPORT SHUTTLE SERVICE

Ancillary Revenue On-Site Consulting Package


Aviation, Rail, & Trucking 6-1

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

FALLS FLAT: COMPARING THE TTC`S FARE POLICY TO OTHER LEADING TRANSIT AGENCIES

Transportation Network Companies Airport Access Recommendations. Board of Airport Commissioners December 18, 2014

II. Terminology and Basic

Transit System Performance Update

Evaluation of Significant Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia Transportation District. HB 599 Ratings Overview NVTA - January 22, 2015

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

Orange County Transportation Authority Fare Integration Project A Regional Approach

Airlines Worldwide Fly High on Ancillary Services Revenues Jump 43 percent to 11 billion ($13.5 billion)

Bill Brannan Kathy Pope Lisa Ballard. CTAI s 2010 Conference

Saving time and money for smart travel arrangers

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

A Tour Across America s Managed Lanes Mike Heiligenstein, Executive Director Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority

Navitaire GoNow Day-of-departure services

ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE FROM PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Update on Palm Beach MPO Funded Projects

GTFS in Oregon: Come one, Come all! 2016 RIBTC Conference Joel Manning, Traveler Information Coordinator Oregon Department of Transportation

Citi Industrials Conference

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

BoltBus NACTO Overview. November 2011

2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary

TransAction Overview. Introduction. Vision. NVTA Jurisdictions

Western Placer County Transit Operators Short Range Transit Plan Updates FY to FY Project Update and Alternatives Discussion

Auckland Transport - Transport Indicators Report June 2013

Managing And Understand The Impact Of Of The Air Air Traffic System: United Airline s Perspective

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

Presentation to the DRCOG Board August 16, 2017

Railroad Safety in the United States. Ian Savage

Grow Transfer Incentive Scheme

Salk Institute for Biological Studies

Transcription:

SMART STATIONS IN SMART CITIES 6 th International Conference on Railway Stations Madrid, 19-21 OCTOBER 2017 Integrated Mobility; Thruway Service and Major Station Access Byron Comati VP of Corporate Planning, Amtrak Session: 1a Solutions for Integrated Mobility UNDER THE HIGH PATRONAGE OF ORGANISERS

Topics Covered Amtrak Inter City Bus and Rail Thruways Major Stations Multimodal Access Ride Hailing 2

Amtrak is Part of a Travel Ecosystem Amtrak Ferry Taxi Uber/ Lyft Personal Car Commuter Train Travel Ecosystem Airplane Intercity Bus Bikeshare Subway & Local bus Rental Car Walking 3

What is Thruway service? Thruway service is any transportation service sold and ticketed as part of the Amtrak network that is operated by another carrier (over 1,000 schedules), including: Intercity buses Shuttle buses / vans Local transit buses Commuter trains Ferries Taxis 4

Amtrak has many existing partners INTERLINE DEDICATED 5

What Amtrak Does Maintains Thruway contracts, schedules, fares, connections, station information, and operations coordination Through Connecting Transportation staff manages Thruway services throughout United States (except in California) 6 California Bus Operations manages Thruway services within California

7

Thruway Connections Overview Amtrak sells 1.5 million Thruway tickets each year for travel on connecting services (primarily buses). The combined value of these trips (bus + rail tickets) is over $95 million. Thruway connections add over 400 possible destinations to the Amtrak system. 8

Thruway Business Volume ROUTE TYPE RIDERS TICKET REVENUE DEDICATED - STATE FUNDED 1,081,000 $16,357,000 INTERLINE - STATE FUNDED 25,000 $246,000 DEDICATED LONG DISTANCE 145,000 $1,799,000 INTERLINE - MINIMUM REVENUE GUARANTEE 22,000 $626,000 INTERLINE PER TICKET 262,000 $6,805,000 NJ TRANSIT ATLANTIC CITY LINE 65,000 Not Booked as Revenue CONNECTED RAIL SEGMENTS 1,506,000 $70,000,000 GRAND TOTAL $95,833,000 Dedicated = Bus Company Contract only with Amtrak Interline = Tickets sold by Amtrak offered by another carrier, which also may sell its own tickets for travel 9

Amtrak Business Lines - Thruway Ridership and Revenue Statistics Business Line Passengers with Thruway Tickets Ticket Revenue Northeast Corridor 26,352 $2,004,334 Long Distance 352,999 $39,292,068 State Supported 1,148,599 $28,971,986 1.5 Million Amtrak rail tickets are sold with a thruway ticket at same time Data is from Last 12 months 10

Thruway Statistics by Cost Center MOST RECENT 12 MONTHS CC 6512 CC 5001 (CALIFORNIA) (NATIONAL) TOTAL THRUWAY RIDERS: 1,124,000 476,000 1.6 Million CONNECTED TRAIN RIDERS: 1,132,000 399,000 1.5 Million THRUWAY TICKET REVENUE: $16.2 Million $9.6 Million $26 Million CONNECTED TRAIN TICKET REVENUE: $41.1 Million $29.2 Million $70 Million TOTAL TICKET REVENUE $57.3 Million $38.8 million $96 Million THRUWAY OPERATING BUDGETS (APPROX.): $29 Million $13 Million $41 Million California has over double the Thruway Riders of the rest of the U.S. National Network Thruway connections generate cash contributions primarily by attracting additional passengers to ride Amtrak trains. 11

Connected Rail Riders per Year by Route California Rail Routes dominate in the Thruway Market Route Connected Riders 39 SAN JOAQUINS 604,156 35 PACIFIC SURFLINER 193,789 37 CAPITOLS 181,850 34 COAST STARLIGHT 79,365 36 CASCADES 54,664 28 SOUTHW EST CHIEF 46,143 27 CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR 43,940 32 TEXAS EAGLE 35,609 47 W ASHINGTON-NEW PORT NEW S 30,259 05 NORTHEAST REGIONAL 23,806 16 SILVER STAR 22,484 19 SILVER METEOR 22,030 26 CAPITOL LIMITED 21,833 45 LAKE SHORE LIMITED 19,059 25 EMPIRE BUILDER 16,546 48 PALMETTO 15,859 22 W OLVERINE 15,135 46 W ASHINGTON-LYNCHBURG 9,603 33 SUNSET LIMITED 8,878 18 CARDINAL 8,667 30 CITY OF NEW ORLEANS 6,906 21 HIAW ATHA 6,725 66 CAROLINIAN 6,063 20 LINCOLN SERVICE 6,000 52 CRESCENT 5,676 41 BLUE W ATER 5,388 50 W ASHINGTON-NORFOLK 4,627 57 PENNSYLVANIAN 3,618 14 KEYSTONE 3,058 29 HEARTLAND FLYER 2,876 56 MISSOURI RIVER RUNNER 2,833 67 PIEDMONT 2,785 01 ACELA 2,546 09 DOW NEASTER 2,241 40 ADIRONDACK 2,068 65 PERE MARQUETTE 2,038 54 HOOSIER STATE 1,986 23 ILLINI 1,861 07 MAPLE LEAF 1,733 15 EMPIRE 905 12 NEW HAVEN-SPRINGFIELD 829 24 ILLINOIS ZEPHYR 666 51 W ASHINGTON-RICHMOND 460 03 ETHAN ALLEN 281 04 VERMONTER 102 63 AUTO TRAIN 4 Page

Opportunities Door to Door Mobility Solutions Commuter Rail Thruway Ticketing New Thruway Routes Pilot Projects of New Service Types (e.g. Deluxe Bus) Station Agency Agreements 13

Needed Technology Improvements Improvement Upgrading Arrow to allow for using native schedule numbers of interline carriers. At present, Amtrak uses its own defined schedule numbers for interline schedules, regardless of the schedule number a carrier may use for its own service. Travel document improvements to better describe interline connections, including operating carrier information. Interline Capacity Management: Real-time availability calls and capacity synchronization with interline carriers. Interoperable ticket scanning among carriers whereby Amtrak receives ticket lift scan data from interline carriers. Online interline revenue clearing processes for interline payments. A routing algorithm to build and display connected itineraries (all connecting routes are hand-coded in Arrow by CNOC and Connectivity staff over 20,000 routes). Multi-ride ticket lift revenue should accrue to Thruway services, not just trains. USA Rail Pass Thruway segments would be assigned ticket revenue. Isolate interline ticket revenue from Amtrak ticket revenue. Benefits Using native schedule numbers would be less confusing for customers and employees. A greater number of schedule numbers would be available for use. Customers would more easily locate connecting services. Drivers and field staff would more easily inspect tickets. Capacity levels would be synchronized among interline carriers to avoid oversold conditions and allow for real-time selling from availability. Real time ticket lift data would allow for improved operations management. Invoicing processes would be simpler, faster, and more efficient for business partners. More city pair combinations would be created and available to customers. Multi-ride ticket revenue could be accurately assigned to buses. Financial settlement with interline carriers would be improved. Interline payments would no longer show as an operating cost on the P&L, replaced with net commission profit. 14

Major Station Access: New York, Philadelphia and Washington D.C. 15

Station Access: Washington D.C. (2016) 16

Station Access: Philadelphia (2016) 17

Station Access: New York (2010) Text (Helvetica or Arial 24 pt) 18

Ride Hailing Trends 19

Amtrak is Part of a Travel Ecosystem Amtrak Ferry Taxi Ride- Hailing; Uber/ Lyft Personal Car Commute r Train Travel Ecosystem Airplane Intercity Bus Bikeshare Subway & local bus Rental Car Walking 20

The First and Last Mile Trains take passengers door to door. First / last mile can be one of the most difficult to plan and expensive to purchase Intercity train riders depend on: Auto access Local public transport Taxis Pedestrian/bicycle In the U.S., taxi service is shifting to ride-hailing services such as Uber and Lyft, especially for business travelers. To what extent will ride-hailing change the transportation mix? 21

Competing Options for Travel Solutions Third party provide integrated trip planning google Maps, Moovel, etc Amtrak currently has few partnerships with local transport authorities. Amtrak is pursuing door to door mobility solutions for customers through partnerships with providers, technology firms, and in-house solutions development. 22

How Do Passengers Access Stations? Transit Cities Many Auto-Dependent Stations are also Taxi/Uber Cities 23

Amtrak First/Last Mile Statistics Top ways to access Amtrak stations Dropped off/picked up by another auto driver Percentage of customers 32% Local public transit 16% Taxi/Limousine 15% Drove and parked 11% 24

Ride-Hailing: Business Traveler Usage Uber and Lyft are primary ride-hailing services in U.S. (and Uber is much larger) In Q4 of 2016, Uber accounted for 52% of automobile business travel transactions (Certify, Inc., a business expense reporting service) The price to purchase a New York City taxi medallion is falling: 2014: $1,300,000 2016: $250,000 25

Uber/Lyft Issues for Amtrak Congestion: Drivers are parking at stations waiting for fares. Diverting trips from mass transit will increase congestion at stations. Station Design: To prevent conflicts, ride-hailing services and taxi services are sometimes designated in different locations. Where and how should customers and drivers connect? Facility Revenue Streams: Should station access fees be collected, and if so, what is the best method for collection? Bundling: Can Amtrak sell combined rail + car travel? What would be the best method? Alternate Transportation: Using car services to protect missed connections. Marketing Partnerships: What is the best practice for marketing partnerships with car services? 26

Uber: Potential Impact on Transit Uber and Lyft can provide last mile and off peak connections for transit, increasing station access (especially for suburban commuter systems). Nevertheless: In 2016, public transit ridership declined in 24 out of 30 major U.S. cities. Service Reduction Ridership Decline Revenue Decline Research on New York travel data suggest that Uber is taking riders from mass transit and increasing vehicles on city streets. Ridership declines could create a negative feedback loop. 27

Summary: Potential Strategies Pursue Thruway eticketing with local transport authorities to improve convenience and attractiveness of transit service. Work with transit agencies to improve the competitive position of mass transit with through-ticketing and improved technology. Design stations to accommodate car services and consider access fees at congested urban stations. Seek marketing partnerships and bundled ticketing with ride-hailing services. Use ride-hailing to improve operations for missed connections, delayed baggage, and potentially package express services. Page

THANK YOU GRACIAS UNDER THE HIGH PATRONAGE OF ORGANISERS