ACRP Problem Statement No Recommended Allocation: -- ACRP Airport Baggage Handling Opportunity

Similar documents
Sawasdee Krup. Applications of RFID in Aviation. Symbol RFID Ecosystem Summit. Bangkok May Louis Kirk

1.231J/16.781J/ESD.224J Airport Systems Fall Security and BHS. Amedeo R. Odoni. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

FACILITATION PANEL (FALP)

Navitaire GoNow Day-of-departure services

The Latest and Greatest in Passenger Processing Technology

UNIVERSITY PARK AIRPORT EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN

TRB and ACRP Research Updates: Practical Application

Airports and UAS: Managing UAS Operations in the Airport Vicinity

Airports and UAS: Integrating UAS into Airport Infrastructure and Planning

NEXTT. Anne Carnall Program Manager, Future Airports. 12 December 2018

FACILITATION PANEL (FALP)

e- Check in project at Narita Airport

Simplifying the Business

FACILITATION (FAL) DIVISION TWELFTH SESSION. Cairo, Egypt, 22 March to 2 April 2004

REVIEW OF THE STATE EXECUTIVE AIRCRAFT POOL

Automated Border Control. AFI-SECFAL meeting 24 May 2017, Gaborone (Botswana)

Paperless Aircraft Operations - IATA s Vision and Actions - Chris MARKOU IATA Operational Costs Management

Aéroports de Montréal

Planning Session 3: Industry Trends Affecting Airport Planning Innovations in Passenger Processing

Air Transportation Optimization. Information Sharing for Global Benefits

01 Pre-Travel. Passenger Facilitation / Passenger Data Harmonization & Quality

FACILITATION PANEL (FALP)

AIRPORT OF THE FUTURE

Beaver Island Airport Terminal Building Project Q & A Prepared by Mead & Hunt

AIRPORT EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN TEMPLATE V 3.3 April 27, 2012

Peter Sorensen Director, Europe Safety, Operations & Infrastructure To represent, lead and serve the airline industry

World Passenger Symposium

IATA Passenger Experience Overview

EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN

FUTURE PASSENGER PROCESSING. ACRP New Concepts for Airport Terminal Landside Facilities

Happy passengers. Lower operational costs.

BAG LOG FUTURE-PROOFING CALGARY AIRPORT A DOUBLE FIRST AT SAN FRANCISCO IATA RESOLUTION 753: THE GOOD NEWS KEFLAVIK THE NEW NORTH ATLANTIC HUB

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Passenger Value of Time, BCA, and Airport Capital Investment Decisions. Thursday, September 13, :00-3:30 PM ET

BAGGAGE HANDLING SYSTEM MAKES FAST CONNECTIONS

Total Airport Management Solution DELIVERING THE NEXT GENERATION AIRPORT

Atennea Air. The most comprehensive ERP software for operating & financial management of your airline

Materna Integrated Passenger Services (Materna ips)

New Enhanced Service Buletin. qtr_04. a quarterly publication boeing.com/commercial/ aeromagazine

Airport Security. Norman Ashford,H.P.Martin Stanton. Clifton A.Moore, Airport Operation, pp , 1997

Developing an Aircraft Weight Database for AEDT

BOMBARDIER, INC

Chapter 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Incorporates passenger management, fleet management and revenue/cost reporting

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-056-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Crosswind-based wake avoidance system approved by the FAA for operational use. Clark Lunsford (MITRE) & Dr. Edward Johnson May 15-16, 2013

Airport Capacity Improvement, Operation Efficiency and Passenger Satisfaction

ACRP Problem Statement: Wingtip Collisions on the Ground. Recommended Funding Amount: $400,000. ACRP Staff Comments. No staff comments.

Approach and Landing Accident Reduction Joint Safety Implementation Team

Advisory Committee For Aviation Consumer Protection Washington, DC

ACI-NA Winter and Irregular Operations Management April 23, Rose Agnew

PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM

Jeppesen Total Navigation Solution

Baggage. Andrew Price Head, Global Baggage Operations

LAX Community Noise Roundtable. Aviation Noise News Update. January 14, 2015

EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN

400 SITA members. 35+ AIR TRANSPORT CIOs EASY AIR TRAVEL EVERY STEP OF THE WAY > 2800 CUSTOMERS WORLDWIDE REPRESENTING AIR TRANSPORT BY SECTOR

RFID based Airport Management System

Foregone Economic Benefits from Airport Capacity Constraints in EU 28 in 2035

CABIN BAGGAGE CHECKER

The real value of Non-Profit Airfares

JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT SECURITY

Irregular Operations (IROPS) Emergency Contingency Plan

Six Must Have Capabilities to Improve the Passenger Experience

AIRSERVICES AUSTALIA DRAFT PRICING NOTIFICATION REGIONAL EXPRESS SUBMISSION TO THE ACCC MAY 2011

White Paper: Assessment of 1-to-Many matching in the airport departure process

Regional Airline Association Phone: (202) M Street, NW Fax: (202) November 3, 2008

CASE STUDY 4. Indonesian Government

3.3 Specific Developments in Air Navigation CNS AUTOMATIC DEPENDENT SURVEILLANCE BROADCAST (ADS-B) (Presented by the United States of America) SUMMARY

Airport Jet-Way Maintenance and Operation Impact on Aircraft ECS

ACI-NA Business Information Technologies Conference

Planning and Designing Airport Infrastructure to Support GPS and PBN Approach Development

solutions Amadeus for ground handlers

Baggage Reconciliation System

RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective

Community Meeting LGB Ground Transportation Study

THE BAHAMAS FLIGHT INFORMATION REGION (FIR) (Presented by Bahamas) SUMMARY

Advancing FTD technologies and the opportunity to the pilot training journey. L3 Proprietary

OFFICIAL D.O.T. EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN

Irregular Operations (IROPS) Contingency Plan

Los Angeles World Airports

Air Traffic Management

THE BOEING COMPANY

Real-time route planning streamlines onboard operations, reduces fuel burn and delays, and improves on-time performance.

Captain Jeff Martin Senior Director Flight Operations Southwest Airlines

Benefits of NEXTT. Nick Careen SVP, APCS. Will Squires Project Manager, Atkins. Anne Carnall Program Manager, NEXTT

ASIS Middle East Conference 2015

Crisis and Strategic Alliance in Aviation Industry. A case study of Singapore Airlines and Air India. Peter Khanh An Le

MetroAir Virtual Airlines

HONEYWELL, INC.

Emerging Technologies at Airports

AIRPORT IRREGULAR OPERATIONS (IROPS) PLAN. South Bend International Airport (SBN) St. Joseph County Airport Authority

IRREGULAR OPERATIONS AIRPORT CONTINGENCY PLAN

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Drone Advisory Committee (DAC) Role Name or Title Organization. Director, UAS Integration Office. Director, UAS Integration Office

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-031-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

UNIT TITLE: CONSTRUCT AND TICKET DOMESTIC AIRFARES

Hosted Flight Data Monitoring. Information Sheet

MY AGENDA FOR TODAY. Today s Partners for Tomorrows aviation. Page 3

A Secure, Seamless, Efficient Passenger Process

The Transforming Airport

Feasibility Study Federal Inspection Service Facility at Long Beach Airport

Transcription:

ACRP Problem Statement No. 14-07-01 Recommended Allocation: -- ACRP Airport Baggage Handling Opportunity ACRP Staff Comments: US Airways is now offering real-time baggage tracking to their customers. The proposed research should consider ACRP Report 30: Reference Guide on Understanding Common Use at Airports; ACRP Report 41: Current Status and Future Implications of Passenger Self-Tagging; and ACRP Report 61: Elimination or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers. The scope and budget of the proposed research are significantly greater than those of a typical ACRP project. Recommend limiting the effort to exploring the need, benefits, challenges, and feasibility of implementing the proposed approach to tracking baggage, and reducing the funding to $300,000. TRB Aviation Group Committees Comments: AIRCRAFT/AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY: An expensive study to develop a proprietary product. A study of baggage handling methodology would be more appropriate to ACRP. AVIATION SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: Not supported. The Research Proposed focuses on research to develop a working model of a baggage handling system using Smart Bag Tag which will track bags, assist in locating bags, alert staff if baggage not loaded correctly, identify a bag for security personnel to track, and change the flight itinerary on the tag. This is a massive, multi-agency RESEARCH project. This should be proposed to the FAA Tech Center Atlantic City, not to TRB as an ACRP project. AIRPORT TERMINALS AND GROUND ACCESS: Not supported. A tremendous amount of research has already been done on this topic. Yes, a common global baggage system based on RFID technology would be useful, but TRB doesn't manufacture hardware and create software to run it as was suggested in the proposal. In addition, something like this needs the written support of the A4A, IATA, and ACI in order to legitimately move forward in a TRB setting. The problem statement is seeking funding to implement a demonstration of a baggage handling concept apparently developed by the person submitting the problem statement. This is the function of venture capital firms, not the ACRP. Furthermore, the funding level appears totally unrealistic for what is being proposed, and the idea that the baggage handling challenges that cost the airline industry over $1 billion per year can be easily solved through the use of readily available technology is rather naive. Review Panel Comments: Not recommended. The scope of this problem statement is broad, the budget and time seem unrealistic, and the objective is to develop a product, which isn't what ACRP does. Additionally, who would own the developed software and hardware? How would this benefit airports directly? How would it integrate into airline operations?

ACRP Airport Baggage Handling Opportunity Summary: ACRP Problem Number: 14-07-01 This is a project to move passenger baggage handling into the 21st century. While baggage handling performance is presently at an all time high, it is unlikely to get significantly better using the technology that airlines use today. This project will develop a baggage handling system which can be used worldwide, and will enable customers, airlines, and interested agencies (such as CBP, TSA, Security personnel, etc.) to track baggage as it moves through hubs and airports. Most importantly, it will enable airlines to change baggage itineraries at the same time that they re-route their owners - without searching for the bags and rewriting the tags. The bag tags will update simultaneously with the passenger PNR (Passenger Name Record), and with the issuance of new boarding cards. This project is being promoted in the airport community as more airlines move into Common Use Terminal Equipment (C.U.T.E.) provided by airports, and it will give airports an advantage in handling customers while generating more revenue for airports. (Note - since this is an industry-wide system rather than a system for one airline or group of airlines it will have a greater impact on the travelling public. It will have a significant return on investment (ROI) for airports)

1 A project to move passenger bag handling into the 21st century to assist Law Enforcement, customers, airlines and airports totally eliminate the Lost Bag. 2 While baggage handling performance is at an all time high there are still far too many incidents where bags are lost, delayed, mis-routed or cause security incidents the technology exists today to eliminate virtually all of these problems, especially during episodes of major disruption, such as natural disasters, storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, etc. (The cost incurred by airlines as a result of delayed / lost / disrupted baggage in 2005 was $3Bn (not a misprint!)) The present day bag tag is designed for one time use. Locating that bag after entry into baggage handling systems is difficult, and changing the itinerary on the tag requires manually locating the bag, writing over the information already printed on the tag, or issuing a new tag. All of these processes are labor intensive. 3. A Smart Bag Tag, similar in appearance to presently used bag tags but incorporating recent innovations, such as electronic paper and RFID systems will track bags, assist in locating them, alert loading staff if the bag was not loaded correctly, quickly identify the bag for security personnel who could physically but remotely track the bag, and automatically change the itinerary on the bag tag if required by the passenger or airline as in the case of flight disruptions. Such a system would have significant benefits to all parties involved - Airports, Security, (Customs and Border Protection, TSA, local police, and other branches of Law Enforcement), airlines, and customers. 4 Develop a working model in a hub airport of a system to demonstrate the capabilities inherent in this proposal. More specific details follow.

5 The estimated funding required to develop this project, manufacture the hardware, create the software, write the procedures and processes for all affected parties listed above and measure the benefits is estimated to be approximately $800,000.00. Funding is required to build the hardware and software for the following elements:- a) Bag tag printers b) Bag tag readers c) Build airport infrastructure either separate to, or co-located with present airport automation. c) Manufacture electronic paper bag tags, with RFID capability d) Provide each airport and/or airport terminal with a Local Area Network (LAN) to support that specific airport baggage handling system, and to communicate with other world-wide systems. e) Develop Baggage Handling Procedures compatible with each airlines, airports, and government agencies requirements. f) Develop training materials for all users (Airlines, Airports, Agencies) g) Write software for baggage handling system to communicate with airline computer (reservations) systems. h) Obtain airline approvals. i) Obtain CBP, TSA, and appropriate agency approvals. It should be noted that the technology and equipment needed to accomplish the objectives here all exist today. Electronic paper is widely used. An electronic boarding pass, similar in concept to the proposed bag tag is is use in a major European airport today. RFID tags are in common use. The radio frequencies required for the link between the bag tag and the airport computer systems are also in use, and meet F.C.C. and F.A.A, requirements. 6 It is expected that this project will take approximately 2 years to bring to fruition.

7 The problem is well known amongst customers, airlines, airports and agencies. Airlines have studied this problem for years. Industry trade groups, such as the International Air Transport Association (IATA) have also worked on this problem. Proposals have been rejected because they were a) too expensive, b) respective airlines couldn t agree with each other on a common approach, c) the available technology was deficient. This project will succeed because it will bring all interested parties to one common table, and it will eliminate a multi-billion $ problem 8 This project is the work of one consultancy -. Principal - Edward J Jacob 9 Submitted by: Edward J Jacob Principal.