Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 1

2 ATLANTA, GEORGIA Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport Master Plan to Master Plan Implementation Jamie McCluskie Director of Aviation Planning & Environmental Broward County Aviation Department jmccluskie@broward.org

Overview Background, Process and Key Drivers FLL Master Plan 1994 South Runway EIS FLL Master Plan 2010 Airfield Refinement Terminal 4 Terminal Modernization T1, T2 & T3 Concourse E Central Processor 3

4 FLL Existing Conditions AIRPORT PROFILE Landside/Terminal 57 Air Carrier Gates 11,579 Structured Parking Spaces Airfield 9,001 North Runway 9L-27R 6,928 Crosswind Runway 13-31 5,276 South Runway (R-27L Activity 10.4 Million Enplanements 272,282 Aircraft Operations

Planning Process at FLL 5 Guiding Principals MASTER PLAN 1994 Part 150 2005-2008 Develop NEM s Noise Exposure Maps Incremental approval within the context of a Master Plan Gain Environmental Approval Provide Alternatives in Planning Refine Plans through Programming MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2005-2010 EIS 2004-2008 Environmental Approval EIS ROD Projects have trigger points (aka Planning Activity Levels) based on Forecasts, i.e.operations and enplanements and other dynamics Strategic Development to address Airport Drivers Airport Layout Plan Terminal Development CIP Development Refined Project Development & CIP Additions Methodology behind Planning and Cost Estimates

6 Development Approval and Implementation Process Strategic Business Plan Airport Tenants FAA Divisions Master Plan BCAD Local Community PEV, TSA, CBP and other Airport Stakeholders Board County Commissioners Approval Airline Committee Approval Executive Approval Project Concept Division Directors CIP Approval Streamlined Process Established for Approval Remains a Work in Progress and Refinement Incremental Development within the framework of the Master Plan Planning & Programming Design Construct Maintain & Operate

Terminal Area Forecasts and Local Airport Forecasts 7 Industry uncertainty continues FY2011 was a record year of enplanements, however only 1% higher than 2008 and 4% higher than 2005 Shift in demand from Domestic to International FAA forecast projects 2.5-3% growth through 2030

Key Driver Low Cost Carriers 8 FLL has a low CPE of $4.00

Key Driver International Passengers 9 International traffic up greater than 40% in the past 5 years Now accounts for 15% of airport traffic, up from 10% 5 years ago and accounts for 10% of our gates Reflective of Demographics of the FLL catchment area

Key Driver Cruise Ship Passengers 10 Cruise Passenger Traffic is approximately 4 M and projected for 7 M by 2026 Now accounts for 25% of airport traffic during peak season

11 1994 FLL MASTER PLAN Project Name: 1994 Master Plan Key Issue: Need to balance Airfield and Terminal that accommodates the forecasts Key Features Provided Concept for Initial 9000 South Runway that elevates over the Railway and US 1 Provides for 3 Runways, North Runway, South Runway and Crosswind Runway Provided Concept for Terminal Development based on pier design Indicates cost of construction of South Runway, at that time, as approximately 300 Million Projected year needed for South Runway was 2004

12 FLL EIS/ROD - South Runway Project Name: EIS/ROD 2008 Issue: Provide Economic and Environmental alternatives, analysis, and feasibility for new runway project Key Features Nine alternatives with the preferred alternative refining initial South Runway to 8,000 to minimize cost and environmental impact into Wetlands. Indicates the decommissioning of the Crosswind Runway Incorporates concurrent Master Plan Update of Conceptual Terminal Alternative scenarios that are not fully developed at this stage. Also, establishes Gate Count of 77-79 gates to balance Airfield and Terminal* Indicates Cost of Construction at this time of South Runway as approximately 800 Million. The EIS established a Conceptual Construction Schedule with end an date of September 2014. As a distinguishing design feature the South runway slope starts from the west end at 9 AMSL and ends at the east runway end at a height of 45 AMSL. Establishes a very conceptual midfield development with a hold pad in the center. Provides basis of Noise Mitigation Plan.

FLL MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2010 Guiding Principals Maximize Flexibility Facilities Demand Driven Development Alternative Decision Deferred Maximize Efficiency Optimize utilization through common use, non-exclusive gates and efficient space planning Proactive Renewal and Replacement Maintain Existing Infrastructure Maintain Competitive Cost Structure and Rates Maximize Federal & State Grants Maximize PFC Revenues Maximize non-airline revenue Optimization of Assets for Efficiency to Meet Key Drivers 13

Master Plan Alternatives Additive Alternative 2010 Master Plan Issue: No Definitive Terminal Plan that accommodates the new South Runway, Forecasts and Pax Enplanements Key Features First update to Master Plan in 16 years Redevelopment Alternative Establishes Two potential Terminal Development Scenarios; Additive and Redevelopment, with a unified 2017 concept. Incorporates South Runway 8,000 concept of the EIS as a given assumption and develops a new ALP Incorporates already Constructed Terminal B which was not part of 1994 Master Plan Incorporates already designed Concourse A concept which was not part of original 1994 Master Plan DEMOLITION AND SITE PREP CONSTRUCTION NEW STRUCTURE TEMPORARY CURBSIDE RENOVATION DEPARTURES LEVEL CONSTRUCTION NEW DEPARTURES LEVEL ROAD ARRIVALS LEVEL CONSTRUCTION NEW ARRIVALS LEVEL ROAD 2 LEVEL ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION Unified phase, establishes T4 as the first new Terminal Project to address international growth and constraints caused by South Runway Establishes Order of Magnitude Cost of CIP as approximately 1.87 Billion

15 Unified Project & Trigger Points Establishes a unified T4 Concept that addresses the EIS and Master Plan Establishes Trigger Points for Development The Year 2017 will be the Decision point between Additive and Redevelopment

16 Airfield Refinement Additive & Redevelopment Project Name: Airfield Refinement Key Issue: Current airfield plans are too vague and conceptual. A need for a design ready plan. Key Features Establishes a new airfield configuration that works with both Master Plan Alternatives, T4 and new South Runway. Establishes Dimensions between the Southern Boundary of Terminal 4 and the North Boundary of New South Runway. Models Runway occupancy time to establish location of High Speed Exits and also models Taxi flows to determine an efficient midfield development and relocation of Hold pad out of the midfield in a more efficient location Provides a third parallel taxiway in midfield Establishes a flattened midfield for design & construction simplicity and increases elevation of South Runway to 65 AMSL. Requires Written Re-Evaluation of EIS with slight modifications

Tunnel & Bridge Structure 17

Airfield Refinement & Design 18

19 Terminal 4 Project Name: Terminal 4 Key Issues: Three gates are eliminated due to the South Runway. Increasing Demand of International Gates. A need for interconnectivity between Terminals Key Features Provides the footprint and basic functional elements of Terminal 4 project to accommodate two part approval from the airlines. Establishes T4 West to accommodate gates that will be rendered inoperable by the South Runway project and with connectivity to T3 Establishes a combined T4 West and East to provide a total of 14 swing gates for domestic and international markets. Establishes renewal as well as redevelopment to improve all major functional elements. This includes a new SSCP, new restrooms, new holdrooms and concessions space T4 West approved T4 East still to be approved.

Terminal Modernization Project Name: Terminal Modernization Key Issues: Terminal Design is Pre-911 and outdated to provide adequate facilities for increasing passenger growth Key Features: Focused on T1, T2 & T3 initially. Focused on Mainly Concourse Development Eliminates the Additive Alternative as a viable alternative due to inefficient cost. The airport moves towards a development strategy of centralized versus decentralized Indicates that the best solution for growth includes a future central processor, which is a distinguishing component of Redevelopment Alternative. Provides a two pronged approach of Immediate and Near Term based on procurement rules of the County, and also to provide improvements quickly Moving all of Terminal 3 post security increases flexibility and enhances connectivity with the International Terminal 4 for three concourses H,F, and E Approximate Cost 100M 20

21 Terminal Modernization T1 T2 & T3 Immediate Term Improvements 2yr Plan Aesthetics o Flooring, Walls, Lighting and Ceilings Space Optimization o o o o Optimize Holdroom Seating Improve Circulation Eliminate Unnecessary Gate Podiums Eliminate Pay Phones Improve Basic Functionality o o Install workstations Install Power Outlets Near Term Improvements 5yr Plan Improve Processing Elements o SSCP Expand and Improve Key Facilities o In-line baggage o Restrooms o Relocates,build s and improves square footage post security o Provide connectivity between concourses Increase Revenue Generation o Improve concessions square footage and visibility Improve Infrastructure o Provide adequate water, sewer and electric Incremental Approval within the Context of the Master Plan

Terminal Modernization Terminal 1 Concourse B 22

Terminal Modernization Terminal 1 Concourse C 23

Terminal Modernization Terminal 2 24

Terminal Modernization Terminal 3 Concourse H 25

Terminal Modernization Terminal 3 Concourse H 26

Terminal Modernization Cruise Passenger Interim Solution 2012-2017 27 Cruise Passenger Interim Facility Key Issue: Addresses the high volume of cruise ship pax from Port Everglades. Addresses accommodating additional square footage that terminals are unable to provide due to their pre 911 design. Key Features: Reuse lower floor of the existing Hibiscus Parking Garage, utilizing creative adaptive re-use of facilities Accommodates large influx of Cruise Buses and Taxi s as an inexpensive operational solution Use newly utilized common use software to implement Seeks to separate bag from the passenger and store remotely Seeks to meter Cruise passenger arrival in a more orderly fashion Provides an relatively inexpensive interim solution until centralized processor is built. Estimated to cost approximately 5 million initially

28 Trigger Points Year Enplanements Operations Gates 2012 11,245,000 120,000 57 2013 11,695,000 123,000 57 2014 12,104,000 126,000 58 2015 12,528,000 129,000 59 2016 12,866,000 132,000 60 2017 13,213,000 135,000 61 2018 13,570,000 138,000 63 2019 13,937,000 140,000 64 2020 14,313,000 143,000 66 2021 14,699,000 146,000 67 2022 15,096,000 149,000 69 2030 19,557,000 178,000 79 Assumes max 6 turns and 600 passengers / gate

Concourse E & Central Processor Concourse E extension: 2017 Provides Alternative to Concourse A A dual loaded Concourse for more efficiency in O&M Provides 7 additional gates Central Processor Implementation 2022 Centralize passenger processing to resolve lack of processing square footage and declining ground transportation LOS Addresses cruise ship passengers Excellent location near midifeld for airfield access Redeveloped concessions Continues flexibility with post secure link to international terminal Increase revenue generation potential with larger parking garage & increase concessions opportunities Optimize facility flexibility / increase gate capacity / decrease O&M costs Phased implementation 29

30 Terminal Modernization 11.4 Enplanements/ 197K Ops 57 Gates Terminal 3 Improvements: current upgrades in progress Runway 9L-27R Relocation of High Speed Exits Terminal 2 Improvements: Terminal 1 Improvements: current upgrades in progress current upgrades in progress Taxiway C Extension RON Existing ARFF T2 T1 Terminal 1 Improvements: RON / hold pad RON T3 Palm Garage Hibiscus Garage Cypress Garage T4 Runway 9R-27L Design associated airfield improvements Runway 9R-27L Terminal 4 Improvements: current upgrades in progress

Terminal Modernization 12.1 13.3 M Enplanements/ 203K 219K Ops 57 Gates 31 Other Projects Underway: Wayfinding and signage upgrades throughout airport Tenant and terminal design guidelines 57 Gates 11 RON Positions Runway 9L-27R Terminal 3 Improvements: In-line baggage system Security checkpoint expansion Las Olas Blvd improvements Concourse modifications Holdroom expansion (build-out) Terminal 2 Improvements: In-line baggage system Security checkpoint expansion Terminal optimization and minor reconfigurations Concourse modifications Terminal 1 Improvements: In-line baggage system Security checkpoint expansion Concourse connector and modifications Taxiway C extension RON Existing ARFF T2 T1 Build Crossfield Taxiways T3 Palm Garage Hibiscus Garage Cypress Garage T4 Build South Hold Pad New RON Positions Runway 9R-27L Closed Build Tunnel Structure Runway 10R-28L Under Construction

Terminal Modernization 12.1-14.0 M Enplanements/ 203K-229K Ops 61Gates 32 61 Gates 11 RON Positions Runway 9L-27R Taxiway C extension RON Existing ARFF T2 T1 Build Crossfield Taxiways T3 Palm Garage Hibiscus Garage Cypress Garage T4 Build South Hold Pad New RON Positions Runway 9R-27L Closed Terminal 4 West In-line baggage System Terminal 4 East Build Tunnel Structure Runway 10R-28L Under Construction

Terminal Modernization 12.1-14.0M Enplanements/ 203K - 229K Ops 68 Gates 33 68 Gates 11 RON Positions Runway 9L-27R Taxiway C extension RON Existing ARFF T2 T1 Build Crossfield Taxiways Concourse E Expansion T3 Palm Garage Hibiscus Garage Cypress Garage T4 Build South Hold Pad New RON Positions Runway 9R-27L Closed Build Tunnel Structure Runway 10R-28L Under Construction

Terminal Modernization 12.1-14.0 Enplanements/ 203 K - 299K Ops 68 Gates 34 68 Gates 11 RON Positions Runway 9L-27R Taxiway C extension RON Build Crossfield Taxiways Existing ARFF T3 T2 Palm Garage Hibiscus Garage T1 Cypress Garage Near-term Cruise Passenger Facility Temporary baggage and cruise passenger processing at lower level garage T4 Build South Hold Pad New RON Positions Runway 9R-27L Closed Build Tunnel Structure Runway 10R-28L Under Construction

Terminal Modernization 14.0-15.9M Enplanements/ 229K - 256K Ops 68 Gates 35 Airport North Development 68 Gates 11 RON Positions Runway 10L-28R Relocation of High Speed Exits Taxiway C Extension Terminals 1, 2, 3, 4: Renovation of passenger processing areas RON Existing ARFF T2 T1 Airport West Development Crossfield Taxiways T3 Hibiscus Garage Cypress Garage Airport East Development T4 RON South Hold Pad Tunnel Structure New Runway 10R 28L Central Processor Phase 1 Exit Roadway Improvements

Terminal Modernization 15.9-19.6M Enplanements/ 256 K - 306K Ops 76 Gates 36 Airport North Development 76 Gates 11 RON Positions Runway 10L 28R Relocation of high speed exits Build North Hold Pad Taxiway C extension Relocated South Hold Pad Final Concourse E Expansion Relocate ARFF Terminal 3 Modification Demolish Concourses E and F Relocate Federal Inspection Services from Terminal 4 Build Central Concourse T2 Concourse Extension and Terminal 1 Link Demolish Concourse D T1 RON Airport West Development New ARFF Relocated South Hold Pad Crossfield Taxiways South Hold Pad T3 T4 Central Processor Phase 2 RON Airport East Development New Runway 10R 28L Concourse G Expansion Eliminates Concourse F Displaces portion of south hold pad Tunnel Structure

Terminal Modernization 15.9-19.6M Enplanements/ 256 K - 306K Ops 79 Gates 37 Airport North Development 79 Gates 11 RON Positions Runway 10L 28R Relocation of high speed exits RON North Hold Pad Relocated South Hold Pad Airport West Development Relocated South Hold Pad Expanded Central Processor Roadway Realignment Airport East Development ARFF Crossfield Taxiways New Runway 10R 28L Final Concourse G Expansion Eliminates south hold pad Tunnel Structure Unified Master Plan Concept

Lessons Learned Be Proactive, Plan more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: In the past some construction projects had very little Planning to fit within a Comprehensive Master Plan Strategy. Many stakeholder needs where not achieved comprehensively and efficiently. There was instances when a concept would go from design to construction without an actual planning process. Minimize throw-away construction. Refine Cartoons to Detailed plans. Plans should be brought through Planning, Programming and Project Definition stages before going to design and construction. They should be with in a coordinate system and have the dimensions that work so they can serve as a strong basis for design. Minimize change orders in design and construction. Develop Multiple Alternatives: Provide flexibility that can accommodate the changes in the Aviation Industry/Airline business model(s). For example; accommodating the airfield for wider winged aircraft. On the landside, providing Terminal Plans that accommodate Domestic and International, as well as shifts in availability of facilities and new technology. Develop Order of Magnitude Cost estimates: Needs to have a sound methodology. Decisions cannot be made without a benchmark in dollars Master Plan Process is Continuous: Don t wait every 20 years, a lot can change Manage expectations from year to year. 38