The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist, available at (Documents, NAT Docs), contains an up to date list of all current NAT Ops Bulletins.

Similar documents
The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist, available at (Documents, NAT Docs), contains an up to date list of all current NAT Ops Bulletins.

NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist Issued/Effective: 11 June 2012

This NAT OPS Bulletin supersedes NAT OPS Bulletin, Serial Number: Summary of Changes

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist is available at & NAT Documents, NAT Documents, then NAT Ops Bulletins.

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

This Bulletin may be updated, as necessary, as progress is made toward the start date for Phase 2b of the NAT DLM.

[EFFECTIVE DATE: 23 AUG 2012]

The purpose of North Atlantic Operations Bulletin is to distribute the new issue of the Oceanic Errors Safety Bulletin (OESB).

CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK

Data Link Checklist. As of: 9/10/2017 1

The purpose of North Atlantic Operations Bulletin is to promulgate the Sample Expanded Oceanic Checklist.

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist is available at EUR & NAT Documents, NAT Documents, then NAT Ops Bulletins.

Appendix A COMMUNICATION BEST PRACTICES

NATS Operational CPDLC Capability Prestwick and Swanwick centres

Note: Grey shading indicates modifications or additions to NAT OPS Bulletin 2015_003 Rev 45 text.

NAT RLATSM PHASE 2 UPDATE - GUIDANCE FOR U.S

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 33/17

Chapter 6. Brize Radar, Speedbird 213 Heavy, request radar advisory. Speedbird 123 change call sign to BA 123

GENERAL REPORT. Reduced Lateral Separation Minima RLatSM Phase 2. RLatSM Phase 3

RLatSM. Reduced Lateral Separation Trial. FAQs. 4 September 15

RECOMMENDED GUIDANCE FOR FPL AND RELATED ATS MESSAGES

MNPS (HLA), Oceanic, and Contingency Procedures

The purpose of North Atlantic Operations Bulletin is to promulgate the Sample Oceanic Checklist and the Sample Expanded Oceanic Checklist.

Federal Aviation Administration Operations in the New York Center Oceanic CTA/FIR

Subject: Application of Data Link services within Kolkata FIR

U.S. Domestic CPDLC-DCL Users Guide. DATA COMMUNICATIONS INTEGRATED SERVICES (DCIS) Harris Corporation

Air Traffic Management

Application Form and Compliance Checklist - OPS for NAT HLA (MNPS) Approval FORM Operator:

Near-miss involving an Air France Boeing and an Airtours A330 in Shanwick Oceanic Airspace, North Atlantic Track Echo, November 10, 2001

Subject : Correct application of the strategic lateral offset procedures

COVER SHEET. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Information Sheet Part 91 RVSM Letter of Authorization

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION

VATUSA-VATNZ-VATPAC OCEANIC PARTNERSHIP OAKLAND OCEANIC FSS GENERAL SOP 1 OCT 2012

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Official Journal of the European Union L 186/27

CPA2 1256: ft V/2.8nm H

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. Between. and RELATING TO

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

NBAA IOC Oceanic Operations

This Advisory Circular provides guidance to facilitate compliance with the requirements for a Flight Radiotelephone Operator rating.

CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATION CAP 10 CPDLC

What you should know: Future Air Navigation System (FANS)

ICAO Changes to the Present Flight Plan Form. Amendment 1 to the PANS-ATM Fifteenth Edition (PANS-ATM, Doc 4444) Tom Brady ICAO HQ

23 July To: IFATCA Member Associations. Dear colleagues

CPDLC-DCL U.S. Airports

TRANSPONDER WITH IVAC

FRA CDM. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Flight Crew Briefing FRANKFURT AIRPORT. German Harmonisation

COVER SHEET. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Information Sheet Part 91 RVSM Letter of Authorization

Performance Based Communication and Surveillance in the ICAO North Atlantic Region. PBCS in NAT HLA

ENR 1.1 GEN. RULES (Insert para 13 in ENR 1.1 of AIP India as follows)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THIS SAMPLE FLIGHT MANUAL SUPPLEMENT

Consider problems and make specific recommendations concerning the provision of ATS/AIS/SAR in the Asia Pacific Region LOST COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION N

SECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS

SECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES

RNP 2 JOB AID REQUEST TO CONDUCT RNP 2 OPERATIONS

Entry of Flight Identity

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION WESTERN AND CENTRAL AFRICA OFFICE. Thirteenth Meeting of the FANS I/A Interoperability Team (SAT/FIT/13)

SRC POSITION PAPER. Edition March 2011 Released Issue

Pilot RVSM Training Guidance Material

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE P.O.BOX 181, VICTORIA SEYCHELLES

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. National Policy

Primus Epic Communications Management Function (CMF)

Appendix F ICAO MODEL RUNWAY INCURSION INITIAL REPORT FORM

Changi Airport A-CDM Handbook

Aircraft Leasing. United Kingdom Overseas Territories Aviation Circular OTAC Issue 1 7 October Effective: on issue

Advisory Circular. 1.1 Purpose Applicability Description of Changes... 2

CASCADE OPERATIONAL FOCUS GROUP (OFG)

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 855 of 2004 IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY (AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE SYSTEMS) ORDER, 2004

Manual on Monitoring the Application of Performance-based Horizontal Separation Minima

U.S. Domestic CPDLC Flight and Route Planning Guide

SERA AND CAP694 (THE UK FLIGHT PLANNING GUIDE) - GUIDANCE. Correct to 1 May This document is for guidance only and is subject to change.

GOLD Chapter 4 Controller Procedures

TRACK ADVISORY USER S GUIDE FOR DISPATCHERS

AFI REGIONAL MONITORING AGENCY (ARMA) ARMA forms for use in obtaining information from a State authorities and/or Service Providers

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

Subject: Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Operations and Operational Authorization

NAV CANADA and DATA LINK IMPLEMENTATION. Shelley Bailey NAV CANADA May 2016 Sint Maarten

AOP 11 Low Visibility Procedures (LVP s) (Aerodrome Operating Procedure)

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION FIRST MEETING OF DIRECTORS OF CIVIL AVIATION OF THE CARIBBEAN REGION (CAR/DCA/1)

AMDAR Software Development. B777 Software Development. (Submitted by AMDAR Panel Chairman) Summary and purpose of document

Advisory Circular. Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast

helicopter? Fixed wing 4p58 HINDSIGHT SITUATIONAL EXAMPLE

Global Operational Data Link Doc 10037

JAA Administrative & Guidance Material Section Five: Licensing, Part Two: Procedures

Intentionally left blank

Advisory Circular. 1.1 Purpose Applicability Description of Changes... 2

BEST PRACTICES GUIDE v1.0

EASA NPA on SERA Part ENAV Response sheet. GENERAL COMMENTS ON NPA PACKAGE Note: Specific comments are provided after the General Comments

PBN Operational Approval Oceanic and Remote En Route Navigation Specifications

AIRAC AIP SUPPLEMENT A 16/17 08 June 2017

Performance Based Communications Surveillance (PBCS) in the North Atlantic Organized Track System

Understanding the Jeppesen. Updates: Changes, Errata and What s New

Network Safeworking Rules and Procedures

Transcription:

Serial Number: 2010-006 Subject: ORCA Procedures for Shanwick Issued/Effective: 18 March 2004 The purpose of North Atlantic Operations Bulletin 2010-006 is to promulgate the Oceanic Clearance Delivery via data link procedures on behalf of the Shanwick Oceanic Area Control Centre. Any Queries relating to this document should be addressed to: Head of Engineering Operations Support ScOACC Atlantic House. Sherwood Road. Prestwick. Ayrshire. KA9 2NR. United Kingdom Tel: 00 44 (0)1292 692772 Fax: 00 44 (0)1292 692640 e-mail: oceanic.engineering@nats.co.uk NOTICE NAT Ops Bulletins are used to distribute information on behalf of the North Atlantic Systems Planning Group (NAT SPG). The material contained therein may be developed within the working structure of the NAT SPG or be third party documents posted at the request of a NAT SPG Member State. A printed or electronic copy of this Bulletin, plus any associated documentation, is provided to the recipient as is and without any warranties as to its description, condition, quality, fitness for purpose or functionality and for use by the recipient solely for guidance only. The information published by ICAO in this document is made available without warranty of any kind; the Organization accepts no responsibility or liability whether direct or indirect, as to the currency, accuracy or quality of the information, nor for any consequence of its use. The designations and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist, available at www.paris.icao.int (Documents, NAT Docs), contains an up to date list of all current NAT Ops Bulletins. There is no objection to the reproduction of extracts of information contained in this Bulletin if the source is acknowledged.

Guidance Material for Delivery of Oceanic Clearances by ORCA (Shanwick) Updated versions of this document are available on the NAT PCO website. (www.nat-pco.org) Any Queries relating to this document should be addressed to: Head of Engineering Operations Support ScOACC Atlantic House. Sherwood Road. Prestwick. Ayrshire. KA9 2NR. United Kingdom Tel: 00 44 (0)1292 692772 Fax: 00 44 (0)1292 692640 e-mail: oceanic.engineering@nats.co.uk Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 1 of 16

Contents Contents 2 Summary of Changes 3 Glossary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Connecting to ORCA 5 3. Requesting Shanwick Oceanic Clearance 6 4. Clearance Negotiation 6 5. Clearance Delivery 7 6. Clearance Acknowledgement 8 7. Reclearances 9 8. Time Revisions 10 Appendix A - System Overview Diagram 11 Appendix B - Terms Used in the RCL RMK/ Field 12 Appendix C - ORCA Messages and Crew Actions 13 Appendix D - Terms Used in ATC/ Field 16 Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 2 of 16

Summary of Changes from Issue 10: Reference: Revised uplink messages Appendix C Revised timers Section 3 Minor editorial changes Various Glossary: AEEC ACARS ARINC CDO CLA CLX EGGX ETA FDPS FSM HF OACC OCA ORCA RCL ScOACC SITA TMI Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee Aircraft Communications, Addressing and Reporting System Aeronautical Radio Incorporated Clearance Delivery Officer Clearance Acknowledgement downlink message Oceanic Clearance uplink message ICAO 4 letter code for Shanwick Estimated Time of Arrival Flight Data Processing System Flight System Message High Frequency Oceanic Area Control Centre Oceanic Control Area Oceanic Route Clearance Authorisation service Request for Clearance Scottish and Oceanic Area Control Centre Société Internationale de Télécommunications Aéronautiques Track Message Ident number Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 3 of 16

VHF Very High Frequency 1. Introduction 1.1 The Prestwick Oceanic Area Control Centre (OACC) provides an air traffic control service within the Shanwick Oceanic Control Area (OCA). All aircraft require permission in the form of an Oceanic Clearance prior to entering the Shanwick OCA. 1.2 Shanwick provides a Westbound Oceanic Clearance Delivery service via Datalink to aircraft fitted with an appropriate specification of Aircraft Communications, Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) equipment. This service is known as Oceanic Route Clearance Authorisation (ORCA). 1.3 ORCA is available via network service providers and utilises their respective air-ground facilities. Appendix A provides an overview of this interface. 1.4 ORCA is configurable to accommodate variations in airline datalink communication capabilities. The principle operations are: - datalink readback of clearance - voice readback of clearance Datalink readback is the preferred mode of operation. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 4 of 16

2. Connecting to ORCA 2.1 The ORCA transaction is initiated in all cases by a downlink request (RCL). This may be an AEEC 623 compliant RCL, or any suitable downlink reformatted by a ground based system into this format. 2.2 Any RCL must contain the following information, as a minimum:- Shanwick Entry Point. ETA for Entry Point. Requested Mach Number. Requested Flight Level. 2.3 Crews should add remarks (RMK/) indicating the preferred alternative to the requested clearance and maximum flight level that can be accepted at the Entry Point. Inclusion of this information greatly assists the Shanwick Controller and expedites clearance delivery process. 2.4 The RCL must contain the same callsign format as the current filed flight plan. 2.5 The RCL must comply with the formats shown in the examples below or it will be rejected by ORCA. The RMK/ field is free text and should be used to provide additional information to the controller. Only those abbreviations specified in Appendix B are permitted. Examples:- -DOGAL/1255 M082F370-RMK/2ND NAT D F370 MAX F390 -DINIM/0750 M082F350-RMK/2ND F330 MAX F350 -ERAKA/1710 M082F350-RMK/2ND NAT A F350 MAX F370 (Due to FDPS specifications, the RCL should not exceed 80 characters in total.) Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 5 of 16

3. Requesting Shanwick Oceanic Clearance 3.1 GENERAL 3.1.1 Aircraft must not enter Shanwick Oceanic Airspace without a clearance. 3.1.2 Crews should request Oceanic clearance not more than 90 minutes flying time from the OCA boundary. RCLs outwith this parameter, will be rejected. 3.1.3 Crews should request Oceanic clearance not less than 30 minutes flying time from the OCA boundary. RCLs outwith this parameter, will be rejected. 3.1.4 If a flight is within 15 minutes of the OCA boundary and no clearance has been received, the crew must contact Shanwick by voice and advise the ATC authority for the airspace in which they are operating. 3.2 ORCA USE 3.2.1 Crews requesting via ORCA must contact Shanwick by voice if no clearance has been received within 15 minutes of making a request for clearance. It is the responsibility of the crew to monitor this time period. 3.2.2 The crew should expect an advisory message from ORCA within 5 minutes. If this is not received one further attempt to downlink an RCL can be made (provided the 30-minute parameter, above, can still be met). If this second attempt to downlink the RCL also fails to generate an advisory message the crew must revert to voice procedures. Example, expected response to an RCL: RCL RECEIVED IF NO CLEARANCE WITHIN 15 MINUTES CONTACT SHANWICK BY VOICE 3.2.3 ORCA RCLs do not require crews to state TMI. The CLX contains a Track identifier and includes full route co-ordinates. 3.2.4 When the aircraft is estimated to be 10 minutes from the boundary, if the transaction has not completed, ORCA will not be used to issue clearances. 4. Clearance Negotiation 4.1 Upon receipt of the RCL, the Shanwick controller may wish to negotiate the clearance requirements with the crew. To achieve this, the controller may issue a datalink message instructing the crew to contact Shanwick by voice. Example: RCL RECEIVED NEGOTIATION REQUIRED CONTACT SHANWICK BY VOICE 4.2 The crew must contact Shanwick by voice as soon as possible, using the phrase <CALLSIGN> ORCA CONTACT. This phrase assists the communicator in identifying ORCA flights. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 6 of 16

4.3 The Oceanic Clearance will be issued via ORCA, unless otherwise advised by Shanwick. 5. Clearance Delivery 5.1 The ORCA clearance message (CLX) shall be uplinked to the aircraft and shall contain the following information as a minimum:- Callsign Shanwick Boundary Entry Point and ETA. Flight Level. Mach Number. Route information i.e. full NAT Track or Random Route details. Destination. 5.2 The crew must check that the callsign in the CLX matches the Flight Plan callsign. 5.3 Clearances issued for Random or NAT Track aircraft contain the full route co-ordinates. Track aircraft clearances also include the Track identifier e.g. ALPHA, BRAVO etc. Crews must check that the route co-ordinates received match the published NAT track message and query any discrepancy using voice procedures. 5.4 The CLX may contain additional information, prefixed with the text ATC/. This may be advisory information e.g. LEVEL CHANGE or additional ATC instructions e.g. NOT BEFORE 1125 AT GOMUP. ATC/ messages are detailed in Appendix D. 5.5 If an aircraft is cleared via a different Entry Point from that requested, Shanwick will calculate an ETA and this will be shown in the clearance. If this ETA differs from that calculated by the crew, by 3 minutes or more, Shanwick must be advised. (See section 8) 5.6 All Clearance messages terminate with the phrase- END OF MESSAGE. If this text is not present, then data has been lost during transmission and the clearance must be ignored. Crews must revert to voice procedures. 5.7 If at any stage of an ORCA transaction the crew has cause for doubt, they must contact Shanwick by voice, using the phrase <CALLSIGN> ORCA CONTACT. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 7 of 16

6. Clearance Acknowledgement 6.1 On receipt of the CLX, crew actions shall depend upon the aircraft's downlink capabilities. 6.2 Datalink Acknowledgement 6.2.1 For those aircraft equipped to downlink a datalink acknowledgement (CLA) for the CLX, the crew must send this message as soon as possible. 6.2.2 This CLX must be acknowledged. Should the crew require an alternative to the issued clearance, they must request again. (See Section 7). 6.2.3 Upon receipt of a valid CLA message, ORCA will uplink a Clearance Confirmed message. The clearance transaction is not complete until the confirmation message is received. If the confirmation message is not received, the crew must contact Shanwick by voice. Example: CLA RECEIVED CLEARANCE CONFIRMED 6.2.4 If a CLA message is not received, Shanwick will issue a reminder message to the aircraft. Failure to acknowledge the cle arance will result in the clearance transaction being cancelled by ORCA and the crew being instructed to revert to voice procedures. 6.3 Voice Acknowledgement 6.3.1 For those aircraft who are NOT equipped to downlink a CLA, the crew must contact Shanwic k by voice, as soon as possible, using the phrase <CALLSIGN> ORCA CLEARANCE RECEIVED, ADVISE READY FOR READBACK. This ORCA clearance is not valid until Shanwick has confirmed the read-back. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 8 of 16

7. Reclearances 7.1 If a crew requests a new clearance, or Shanwick requires a change to an existing clearance, one or more CLXs may be received by the crew. These will be annotated RECLEARANCE 1, RECLEARANCE 2 etc. 7.2 All reclearances must be acknowledged. If a reclearance is received before a previous clearance, or reclearance, has been acknowledged, then the reclearance with the highest reclearance number should be acknowledged. 7.3 Due to Shanwick procedures, reclearances may not be numbered consecutively. This is not a cause for concern provided that the latest reclearance always has a higher number than any previous. 7.4 Having completed the transaction sequence, the crew may make a request for a change to the clearance by ORCA or voice, and this request will be dealt with appropriate to the method of request. 7.5 A subsequent RCL does not cancel the issued clearance, which remains valid, until the associated reclearance has been confirmed. 7.6 If Shanwick is unable to approve a request for a change to a clearance, the crew will receive a reclearance which is a repeat of the original, but which contains the text; ATC/ UNABLE TO APPROVE REQUEST 7.7 Such reclearances must be acknowledged. Failure to acknowledge the reclearance will result in the entire transaction being cancelled by ORCA. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 9 of 16

8. Time Revisions 8.1 If the ETA for the Entry Point changes by 3 minutes or more Shanwick must be advised. This may be achieved by voice or by an ORCA request, containing the revised ETA. 8.2 The crew should expect to receive a Reclearance showing the revised ETA. This may be a copy of the original CLX (containing the new ETA) or the CLX may contain a change in any clearance parameter, should the revised ETA make this necessary (accompanied by appropriate information in the ATC/ field). 8.3 If an aircraft is cleared via a different Entry Point from that requested, or previously cleared, Shanwick will calculate a revised ETA for that Entry Point and this will be shown in the clearance. If this ETA is different from that calculated by the crew by 3 minutes or more, Shanwick must be advised. 8.4 All reclearances must be acknowledged. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 10 of 16

Appendix A - System Overview Diagram Satellite SAT WEST BOUND AIRCRAFT ORCA clearance delivery Voice (R/T) VHF Ground Station Clearance Request RCL / CLA RCL / CLA VALID RCL / CLA Clearance Delivery Officer Clearance Delivery SITA/ARINC ground networks FSM / CLX Ground Station FSM / CLX FSM / CLX ORCA processor RCL - Clearance request message (downlink) Shanwick FDPS Clearance Planner Controller CLX - Shanwick clearance (uplink) CLA - Clearance acknowledgment (downlink) FSM - Flight system message (uplink) Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 11 of 16

Appendix B - Terms Used in the RCL RMK/ Field The following are expected abbreviations used in the RCL RMK/ field. These messages can be used in any sequence and/or combination to provide additional information to Shanwick. 2ND MAX F M NAT 1D STH 1D NTH RMK/ Field Definition Alternative Track or Level Request e.g. 2ND NAT C or 2ND F370 Maximum acceptable Flight Level at Oceanic Entry Point e.g. MAX F350 or 2ND F330 MAX 350 Flight level e.g. F370 Mach number e.g. M080 North Atlantic Track e.g. NAT D 1 degree south e.g 2ND 1D STH NAT E or 2ND 1D STH 1 degree north e.g 1D NTH NAT A or 2ND 1D STH Notes: 1. -RMK/ text is required to comply with AEEC623 specification. 2. Provision of this additional information reduces the requirement for a controller to contact crews by voice for clearance negotiation. 3. To avoid confusion, any other Remarks should be written as free text, and not abbreviated. Example, crews should not use NBT to represent Next Best Track, as Shanwick use this abbreviation for Not Before Time. 4. If the crew request an Entry Point that differs from the filed Flight Plan, the RMK/ entry should indicate this change. Using RMK/ NEW ENTRY will prevent Shanwick having to confirm this change by voice. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 12 of 16

Appendix C - ORCA Messages and Crew Actions Uplink messages will use a standard format, and give guidance to crews, where possible. Messages ending in: Resubmit your request Contact Shanwick by Voice Revert to voice Procedures Crew action: Amend the identified error, then re-send the RCL Contact Shanwick, by voice, as quickly as possible, but anticipate that clearance will be issued by ORCA An error or failure has occurred. Further ORCA messaging should not take place, and voice procedures must be used to obtain the Oceanic clearance Specific Uplink Message RCL RECEIVED IF NO CLEARANCE WITHIN 15 MINUTES CONTACT SHANWICK BY VOICE Crew Action Standby for clearance. If no CLX received within 15 mins, or if less than 15 mins flying time of the Entry Point - Contact Shanwick by voice. REQUEST BEING PROCESSED AWAIT TRANSACTION COMPLETION FLIGHT PLAN NOT HELD INVALID <callsign, Mach No, Level, etc> RESUBMIT YOUR REQUEST (CLA or) ERROR IN MESSAGE REVERT TO VOICE PROCEDURES RCL SENT TOO EARLY REQUEST AGAIN LATER Await clearance issued on the basis of the original RCL, then input new RCL if required. Check that the correct callsign was used. Amend and re-request. OR Contact Shanwick by voice to provide FPL details and request clearance verbally. Check the identified error, amend and resubmit the RCL. An error has been detected and further datalink communication should not take place. Contact Shanwick by voice to request and receive the clearance. Clearance request received more than 90 minutes prior to the boundary. Check the ETA, and rerequest at the correct time. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 13 of 16

Specific Uplink Message RCL RECEIVED TOO LATE REVERT TO VOICE PROCEDURES INVALID REGISTRATION REVERT TO VOICE PROCEDURES CALLSIGN ALREADY IN USE Crew Action Clearance request received less than 30 minutes prior to the boundary. Check ETA. If less than 30 minutes from boundary, ORCA cannot be used. Contact Shanwick by voice. If more than 30 minutes from the boundary, amend ETA and resubmit RCL. Contact Shanwick by voice to request and receive the clearance. Another aircraft has already requested clearance using the callsign included in the RCL. Check the data, amend and re-submit the RCL. OR, Contact Shanwick immediately by voice. NETWORK CONGES TION REVERT TO VOICE PROCEDURES A network or ground system error has been detected. Contact Shanwick immediately by voice. ORCA SERVICE NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE REVERT TO VOICE PROCEDURES RCL (or CLA) REJECTED GROUND SYSTEM ERROR REVERT TO VOICE PROCEDURES RCL RECEIVED SHANWICK CLEARANCE NOT ACKNOWLEDGED SEND DATALINK ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOW TRANSACTION TIMEOUT REVERT TO VOICE PROCEDURES Clearance Acknowledgement has not been received. Acknowledge clearance by datalink now. Failure to do so will result in transaction termination. Acknowledgement has not been received. Clearance is not valid. Contact Shanwick by voice for clearance readback. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 14 of 16

Specific Uplink Message Clearance Message (CLX) or Reclearance 1, Reclearance 2 etc. Crew Action Acknowledge any clearance or reclearance Acknowledge highest numbered reclearance only. If not understood, contact Shanwick by voice. Ensure message is terminated with "End of Message". If absent, clearance is incomplete - contact Shanwick by voice. Check NAT Track route matches published NAT Track. CLA RECEIVED CLEARANCE CONFIRMED RCL (or CLA) RECEIVED NEGOTIATION REQUIRED CONTACT SHANWICK BY VOICE CLA REJECTED CLEARANCE CANCELLED REVERT TO VOICE PROCEDURES Acknowledgement received. Clearance is now valid. If not received, contact Shanwick by voice. Negotiation is required, or communications problems encountered. Contact Shanwick by voice immediately. Anticipate that clearance will be issued via datalink. Invalid CLA receiv ed at ORCA. Transaction failed. Contact Shanwick by voice. OR A Re-clearance message has not been delivered. The current clearance may not be valid. Contact Shanwick by voice immediately. Notes: 1. Where a clearance has been confirmed, and the aircraft s ETA changes by 3 minutes or more, Shanwick must be advised, by ORCA RCL or by voice. Crews must check that any Reclearance reflects this new ETA. The reclearance may also contain a change to any clearance parameter 2. Shanwick may initiate one or more reclearances. Due to procedures, reclearances may not be numbered consecutively. This is not a cause for concern provided that the latest Reclearance is always a higher number than the previous. 3. All messages are terminated by the phrase END OF MESSAGE. If this is not present then the message is incomplete and the crew shall revert to voice procedures. 4. It is imperative that crews acknowledge receipt of a clearance, even if a subsequent RCL is to be made. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 15 of 16

Appendix D - Terms Used in the ATC/ Field For Information Level Change Mach Change Entry Point Change Route Change At {Position} Route Change At Multiple Route Points Request Level Change At {Position} Unable To Approve Request Clearance is at a level different from that requested or previously cleared. Clearance is at a speed different from that requested or previously cleared. Clearance is via an Entry Point different from that requested, or previously cleared. Clearance is via a single route point different from that requested or previously cleared. Clearance is via a route that has two or more points different from that requested or previously cleared. Pilot should request a level change at point specified. Shanwick unable to approve request for change to clearance. This Reclearance should be a copy of the previous clearance. Crews should check for any discrepancy or ATC/ field information. Further Instructions Not Before {Time} At {Position} Not Later Than {Time} At {Position} Leave Level {Level} At {Position} Leave Level {Level} At {Time} Be Level {Level} At {Position} Be Level {Level} At {Time} Clearance Limit {Position} Cross specified position not before the specified time. Cross specified position not later than the specified time. Leave the specified level at or after passing the specified position. Leave the specified level at or after the specified time. Reach the specified level at or before the specified position. Reach the specified level at or before the specified time. Although further routing is indicated on clearance, clearance is only valid to specified point and onward clearance must be confirmed beyond this point. Note: The ATC/ field is not always present. If present it may contain none, one, or more of the terms above. Effective Date: 18 th March 2004 Issue 11 Page 16 of 16