Appendix 8: Fitted distribution parameters for ship location

Similar documents
AD Table 1.--Goodrich Evacuation Systems Installed on Certain Boeing Model Airplanes. Having any serial number (S/N) -

Raft Island Gig Harbor, Washington

SHARK ROUTE Learning about sharks and ours oceans

TAMPERE SIGHTS IN TAMPERE AND HOURS WHEN THEY ARE OPEN. OBSERVATION TOWERS: Observation Toon Pyynikki Ridge, open 9 21 every day.

The easyjet spoof commercial, making fun of British Airways. Taken from April 29, 2012

(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 28, 2008.

4. The Council s LTCCP decision on 30 June 2009 confirmed the extended tram route and funding.

Pike State Forest, Near Winslow, Indiana

Finding Aid for Series F David Thompson's boundary survey maps prepared under Articles VI and VII of the Treaty of Ghent

WHEN IS THE NEXT SHIPPING BOOM?

Report on shipping accidents in the Baltic Sea area during 2010

Implementation Policy on. the Qualified Project, etc., for Airport Operation of. the Four National Airports in Hokkaido

Implementation Policy on. the Qualified Project, etc., for Kumamoto Airport Operation

Implementation Policy on. the Qualified Project Etc. for Fukuoka Airport Operation

Timeline of Vineyard Development

International Civil Aviation Organization HIGH-LEVEL CONFERENCE ON AVIATION SECURITY (HLCAS) Montréal, 12 to 14 September 2012

Report on shipping accidents in the Baltic Sea area during Introduction

Media and Source Markets for Domestic Tourism in Tanzania: Study of Kitulo National Park

Manukau Harbour Forum OPEN AGENDA

Deliverable 6-8EN: Minutes of the launching event of the project ISWM-TINOS

Overseas and Mexican Visitors To California

HARBOUR DUES. The Port of Helsingborg

Port Dues and Charges of the Freeport of Riga

Sino-Ecuadorian Economic Interaction Exploits Natural. Resources and Indigenous Peoples

Grandmother's Missed Train Trip

Cocaine, Poverty, and Chocolate: Alternative Development in Peru s former drug capital. Robert Chun

Airport Systems: Planning, Design, and Management

Implementation Policy on. the Project, etc., for the Operation of. Asahikawa Airport

International Boundary Study. Rwanda Uganda Boundary

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

Environmental Assessment. Application

TARIFF OF HARBOUR DUES

Overseas and Mexican Visitors To California

Overseas and Mexican Visitors To California

Strengthening environmental stewardship among major stakeholders in the Grenadine Islands. The Grenadines Water Taxi Project INCEPTION REPORT

Study with Closet (size not given) Dining Room 22ft by 16ft

Occupied housing units by number of rooms. Four room. Three room units. Two room units

C O N T E N TS. I THYATEIRA 1 Lex Sacra Honour to Tiberius Claudius Antyllos... 29

SEZONA 2017/18 SUPERLIGA I 1. LIGA SENIORI SUPERLIGA I 1. LIGA SENIORKE OSTALA DOMAĆA NATJECANJA EUROPSKA KUP NATJECANJA REPREZENTACIJA HRVATSKE

2 Department of MBA, Kalasalingam University,

Unitised Goods Transport via Danish Ports 2004

The Red Fox Inn & Tavern DINNER EVENTS

With grateful thanks and acknowledgement to 'Donald Insall Associates, Historic Buildings Team.

KINGFISHER AIRLINES: MANAGING MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS

FINEST LINK WP2 Appendix 2. Passenger volume estimation

Stage 1 Report on the Scottish Crown Estate Bill

Farm-Related Fatalities in Australia,

Bird Strike Damage Rates for Selected Commercial Jet Aircraft Todd Curtis, The AirSafe.com Foundation

Antarctic Ship-borne Tourism and Inspections Under Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection

Environmental Performance Evaluation of Ro-Ro Passenger Ferry Transportation

NOTICE B-1. Harbour Fees Tariff

Order of the Ministry of Transport. of the Russian Federation No.139 (RFAR 139) On adoption of the Regulations on Specific Features of

Medieval Barcelona. Advanced Level. Work Booklet. Camp d Aprenentatge de Barcelona Name:

SUNLAND- TUJUNGA NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL SPECIAL LAND- USE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES January 22, 2018

CERTIFICATE OF AIRWORTHINESS ISSUE

MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL HELD AT 9.33AM ON THURSDAY 10 MAY 2012

FINAL DESTINATION & LAST RITES: HARIDWAR

Appendix B CLEAR ZONES AND ACCIDENT POTENTIAL ZONES

Table of Contents. Acknowledgements. Executive Summary. Introduction Scope of the Study. 1 Introduction to Russia

WHERE IS THE WORKSHOP VENUE? HOW TO GET TO HELSINGØR FROM COPENHAGEN AIRPORT?

Master Plans and Latest Projects. 30 Years of Development. Version 2.1

REPORT ON THE STATUS OF OAU/AU TREATIES (As at 27 January 2010)

List of Figures List of Tables. List of Abbreviations. 1 Introduction 1

MARITIME DIRECTORATE OF RAVENNA. DECREE no. 13/2014

Short Essay Competition Postgraduate Section 2nd Place. Luke Keogh

Air Transport Safety & Security Checklist

Pousada Suites Motel Redevelopment

Photographs and Maps

UC Berkeley Working Papers

Don t Put Your Client s Shiny New Corporate Jet Into A Sole-Asset L.L.C. (Unless You Really Want to Create an Airline)

Clustering ferry ports class-i based on the ferry ro-ro tonnages and main dimensions

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY. July December 2017

Lightfoot the Deer. Thornton W. Burgess

Roadside Assistance and Concierge Services Terms and Conditions

SURVEY OUTGOING TOURISTS

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY. January June 2018

Wednesday 5 th September 2018 at 7.30pm

SHIP ACCIDENTS IN THE BALTIC SEA AREA

the Port of Gothenburg

MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURES AND TRANSPORT HARBOUR MASTER S OFFICE OF RAVENNA ORDER NO. 95/2015

L-3 KEO The military-industrial complex in Northampton January 2013

MERCHANT SHIPPING (PREVENTION OF OIL POLLUTION) (RECORDS) REGULATIONS 1986

Analysis of technical data of Ro-Ro ships

Digital twin for life predictions in civil aerospace

NORD STREAM 2 STUDY ON COMMERCIAL SHIPS PASSING THE LAY BARGE IN THE FINNISH EEZ

2012 Transits. of UNIMAK PASS. Brief to the Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment Advisory Panel and Management Team. September 2014 version 1

Standard Terms & Conditions Explanatory Document. (to be read in conjunction with Airways New Zealand Standard Terms & Conditions

Key Performance Indicators

The Oral History of Kefalos: A Greek Heritage Organization of Norfolk, Virginia Nicole Kappatos History The University of Mary Washington

HVPOA GENERAL MEETING Sunday, February 12, :30 p.m. Faith Baptist Church Hilltop Road (Hilltop & Flintwood)

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Propulsion Trends in Container Vessels

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE, S.A.B. DE C.V.

The settlement at Dhaskalio

ARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSENGERS INTENDING TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORT

Classroom ~ R-ES-O-N-A-N-C-E--I-M-a-r-ch

European Aviation Safety Agency

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

Transcription:

Appendix 8: Fitted distribution parameters for ship location Drogden Southbound Data Fitted Average -56-56 Stdev 56 34 Ratio,4 Registrations Mixed dist Channel borders 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-5 -3-1 1 3 5,12,1 Registrations Mixed distribution,8,6,4,2-4 -36-32 -28-24 -2-16 -12-8-4 48 12 162 24 2832 36 4 viii

Drogden Northbound Data Fitted Average 5 51 Stdev 63 35 Ratio,6 Registrations Mixed dist Channel borders 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-5 -3-1 1 3 5,12,1 Registrations Mixed distribution,8,6,4,2-4 -36-32 -28-24 -2-16 -12-8-4 48 12 162 24 2832 36 4 ix

Flinten Northbound Data Fitted Average 3 33 Stdev 51 37 Ratio,5 Registrations Mixed dist Channel borders 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-5 -3-1 1 3 5,12,1 Registrations Mixed distribution,8,6,4,2-4 -36-32 -28-24 -2-16 -12-8-4 48 12 162 24 2832 36 4 x

Flinten Southbound Data Fitted Average -5-53 Stdev 72 43 Ratio,6 Registrations Mixed dist Channel borders 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-5 -3-1 1 3 5,12,1 Registrations Mixed distribution,8,6,4,2-4 -36-32 -28-24 -2-16 -12-8-4 48 12 162 24 2832 36 4 xi

Ven West Southbound Data Fitted Average 2611 2679 Stdev 535 41 Ratio,7 Registrations Mixed dist Channel borders 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-6 -4-2 2 4 6,1,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1-4616,344-4176,6564-3737,83 Registrations -3297,363-2857,7123-2418,642-1978,4162-1538,7681-199,121-659,4726-219,8242 219,8242 659,4726 199,121 1538,7681 1978,4162 2418,642 2857,7123 3297,363 3737,83 4176,6564 Mixed distribution xii

Ven West Northbound Data Fitted Average 2989 378 Stdev 931 28 Ratio,14 Registrations Mixed dist Channel borders 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-6 -4-2 2 4 6,14,12,1,8,6,4,2-4616,344-4176,6564-3737,83 Registrations -3297,363-2857,7123-2418,642-1978,4162-1538,7681-199,121-659,4726-219,8242 219,8242 659,4726 199,121 1538,7681 1978,4162 2418,642 2857,7123 3297,363 3737,83 4176,6564 Mixed distribution xiii

Ven East Northbound Data Fitted Average -1392-1439 Stdev 338 273 Ratio,7 Registrations Mixed dist Channel borders 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-3 -2-1 1 2 3,16,14,12,1,8,6,4,2-2496,1621-2258,4324-22,727 Registrations -1782,9729-1545,2432-137,5135-169,7838-832,544-594,32431-356,59459-118,86486 118,86486 356,59459 594,32431 832,544 169,7838 137,5135 1545,2432 1782,9729 22,727 2258,4324 Mixed distribution xiv

Ven East Southbound Data Fitted Average -1329-1655 Stdev 659 278 Ratio,28 Registrations Mixed dist Channel borders 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-3 -2-1 1 2 3,16,14,12,1,8,6,4,2-2496,1621-2258,4324-22,727 Registrations -1782,9729-1545,2432-137,5135-169,7838-832,544-594,32431-356,59459-118,86486 118,86486 356,59459 594,32431 832,544 169,7838 137,5135 1545,2432 1782,9729 22,727 2258,4324 Mixed distribution xv

Appendix 9: Passage situation distributions Drogden 1 9 8 7 Probability 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Passage distance [m] Drogden 35% 3 probability 25% 2 15% 1 5%, 6, 12, 18, 24, 3, 36, 42, 48, 54, 6, 66, Passage distance [m] Drogden Maximum width of passing ships [m] 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Passage distance [m] xvi

Broen 1 9 8 7 Probability 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Passage distance [m] Broen 8 7 probability 6 5 4 3 2 1 3, 125,5 221, 316,5 412, 57,5 63, 698,5 794, 889,5 Passage distance [m] Broen Maximum width of passing ships [m] 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Passage distance [m] xvii

VenØst 1 9 8 7 Probability 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 Passage distance [m] VenØst 12% 1 probability 8% 6% 4% 2% 1, 119, 228, 337, 446, 555, 664, 773, 882, 991, 11, 129, Passage distance [m] VenØst Maximum width of passing ships [m] 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 2 4 6 8 1 12 Passage distance [m] xviii

VenVest 1 9 8 7 Probability 6 5 4 3 2 1 5 1 15 2 Passage distance [m] VenVest 16% 14% probability 12% 1 8% 6% 4% 2% 8, 272, 464, 656, 848, 14, 1232, 1424, 1616, 188, 2, 2192, Passage distance [m] VenVest Maximum width of passing ships [m] 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 5 1 15 2 Passage distance [m] xix

HH 1 9 8 7 Probability 6 5 4 3 2 1 5 1 15 2 25 Passage distance [m] HH 16% 14% probability 12% 1 8% 6% 4% 2%, 22, 44, 66, 88, 11, 132, 154, 176, 198, 22, 242, Passage distance [m] HH Maximum width of passing ships [m] 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 5 1 15 2 25 Passage distance [m] xx

Appendix 1: Estimation of the number of leisure boats in Øresund According to the risk model, the total number of leisure boats must be determined. This information is not given in any reference; hence this number must be estimated. Beside the total number of leisure boats, the amount of time the boats spend outside harbour must be estimated as well. Some of the larger harbours log information about the number of permanent residents in the harbour and the annual number of guest nights. Traffic derived from guest nights and traffic derived from permanent residents in harbours in Øresund contribute to the total number of leisure boats. These two parts are described in the following sections. Accounting traffic from guest nights The estimation of the number of leisure boats in Øresund is based on the following assumptions: Each coastline kilometre is associated with a certain number of guest nights. The coastline intensity for Copenhagen County is representative for all coastline kilometres in Øresund Each guest night has associated a corresponding amount of time at sea, which is assumed to be three hours per day. The lengths of the coastlines in Øresund are given in Table A- 1. Location Coastline Øresund [km] Copenhagen County 63 Frederiksborg County 42 Roskilde County 36 Sweden 139 In total 28 Table A- 1 Number of coastline kilometres for the different counties in Denmark and for the Swedish coastline. The annual number of permanent residents and number of guest night at relevant harbours are shown in Table A- 2. xxi

Location Permanent residents at harbour Annual number of guest nights Svanemøllen*, ref. [26] 179 263 Rungsted*, ref. [27] 8 27 Helsingør, ref. [28] 95 1 Hellerup* Skovshoved*, ref. [29] 42 27 Dragør*, ref. [3] 75 75 Helsingborg, ref. [31] 28 35 Copenhagen, ref. [7] - 15 464 # Copenhagen County, ref. [7] - 41 861 # Table A- 2 Annual number of permanent residents and number of guest night at relevant harbours. The two last rows are for the summer period (June-August) only (marked with #). The total coastline in Øresund is approximately 4.4 larger than the coastline of Copenhagen County. Using this factor and that the annual number of guest nights in Copenhagen County from Danmarks Statistik, the number of guest nights is about 186. for Øresund in total. In the summer period (June August) there are 92 days. Assuming that every guest night corresponds to three hours of sailing, imply that there are about 253 ships on the sea on average during day and night. Accounting for traffic from permanent residents in harbours The information of the total number of permanent residents in the harbours in Øresund is not logged at Danmarks Statistik. However, some of the larger harbours logs this information. In Table A- 2 five of the harbours (marked with *) reside in Copenhagen County. The number of guest nights in these harbours is summarized to 14 963. The proportions between guest nights and permanent residents in these harbours are computed and the average of these proportions is computed. Assuming that this weighted proportion between guest nights in these harbours and Copenhagen County will represent the same proportion of permanent residents, the number of permanent residents in Copenhagen County can be estimated to 11 346. Using the same proportion between Copenhagen County and the rest of the Øresund region, the total number of ships that permanently resides in harbours in Øresund can be estimated to 5 429. In order to estimate the percentage of leisure ships which is outside harbour, some of the contact persons for the harbours listed in Table A- 2, were asked about their perceptions. These perceptions are listed in Table A- 3. xxii

Harbour Summer day Maximum Svanemøllen 1 2 Hellerup 4 Skovshoved - Dragør 1 25% Table A- 3 Estimated percentage of ships outside harbour. According to Table A- 3 it can be assumed that during summer on average 1 is away at daytime (e.g. 12 hours). Thus, 543 leisure boats are at sea during a summer day. It is assumed that there are no leisure boats during the night, thus there are 2522 boats per 24 hour period. Finally, summarizing the traffic corresponding to permanent residents and guest nights, it is assumed that 1 of the permanent residents also contributes to guest nights. Further, it is assumed that there are approximately 25 fishing boats per day in Øresund. The total number of leisure boats and fishing vessel in Øresund during day and night in the summer period is thus 3. To compute a distribution of leisure boats and fishing vessel per month in Øresund, the following assumption are taken: 8 of the boats leaving the harbours sail in the Øresund area, the rest is assumed to sail outside Øresund. Summer period covers the months June, July and August. During the spring and fall months (April, May and September) the traffic is assumed to be 2 of the traffic in the summer period. During the winter period (October to March) no traffic is assumed.. Based on the above assumptions a distribution for the traffic of leisure boats and fishing vessel can be computed. The distribution is shown in Table A- 4 and the resulting annual number of leisure boats and fishing vessels in Øresund is 259 2. Month Ships per day January February March April 48 May 48 June 24 July 24 August 24 September 48 October November December Table A- 4 Distribution for leisure boats and fishing vessel. xxiii

Appendix 11: Visit to ports in Øresund Visits to Danish ports given by port, gross tonnage (GT) and year. 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 Avedøreværket Less than 25 GT Cargo ships................ 25-499 GT Cargo ships................ 5-1499 GT Cargo ships.. 4.... 1 4.... 15-4999 GT Cargo ships 64 125 39 34 83 66 19 191 5-9999 GT Cargo ships 72 27 79 57 42 76 3 33 1 24999 GT Cargo ships................ 25 GT and over Cargo ships................ Dragør Less than 25 GT Cargo ships................ 25-499 GT Cargo ships................ 5-1499 GT Cargo ships................ 15-4999 GT Cargo ships................ Passengerships and ferries 2992 2513 266.......... 5-9999 GT Cargo ships................ Passengerships and ferries 2556 2513 266.......... 1-24999 GT Cargo ships................ 25 GT and over Cargo ships................ Kastrup Less than 25 GT Cargo ships................ 25-499 GT Cargo ships................ Passengerships and ferries 3523 3332 3516 2181........ 5-1499 GT Cargo ships................ 15-4999 GT Cargo ships................ 5-9999 GT Cargo ships................ 1-24999 GT Cargo ships................ 25 GT and over Cargo ships................ xxiv

1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 Copenhagen Less than 25 GT Cargo ships 458 842 719 595 974 128 611 175 Passengerships and ferries 2287 1782 1873 1241........ 25-499 GT Cargo ships 92 822 695 851 796 797 89 778 Passengerships and ferries 11369 1216 1187 12996 852 1259.... 5-1499 GT Cargo ships 1247 1229 716 695 694 645 718 554 Passengerships and ferries 1.............. 15-4999 GT Cargo ships 1411 1424 1424 1394 1319 111 167 876 Passengerships and ferries 9.............. 5-9999 GT Cargo ships 629 627 569 493 529 523 476 473 Passengerships and ferries 1243 1246 1269 722 28...... 1-24999 GT Cargo ships 88 143 188 24 231 31 33 315 Passengerships and ferries 18 189 19 146 666 716 816 543 25 GT and over Cargo ships 11 11 117 113 138 119 161 164 Passengerships and ferries 355 358 365 346 363 364 355 371 Tuborg Less than 25 GT Cargo ships................ 25-499 GT Cargo ships................ 5-1499 GT Cargo ships................ 15-4999 GT Cargo ships................ 5-9999 GT Cargo ships................ 1-24999 GT Cargo ships................ 25 GT and over Cargo ships................ Helsingør Less than 25 GT Cargo ships........ 1 1.... Passengerships and ferries 848 8883 7453 8187 6427 5628 5256 463 25-499 GT Cargo ships.... 9.......... Passengerships and ferries 4492 4222 3431 363 3693 4242 4256 4238 5-1499 GT Cargo ships 21 1 5 2 1 2 5 4 15-4999 GT Cargo ships 6.. 4 4.. 3.... Passengerships and ferries 11385 11816 12525 1297 12985 13471 13518 13136 5-9999 GT Cargo ships................ Passengerships and ferries 4881.............. 1-24999 GT Cargo ships................ Passengerships and ferries 15742 19927 2677 2897 22121 21726 21686 21668 25 GT and over Cargo ships................ Snekkersten Less than 25 GT Cargo ships................ 25-499 GT Cargo ships................ 5-1499 GT Cargo ships................ 15-4999 GT Cargo ships................ xxv

1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 5-9999 GT Cargo ships................ 1-24999 GT Cargo ships................ 25 GT and over Cargo ships................ Køge Less than 25 GT Cargo ships 2 8 61 21 32 15 7.. 25-499 GT Cargo ships 87 95 56 42 42 56 57 78 5-1499 GT Cargo ships 351 274 241 277 277 269 231 24 15-4999 GT Cargo ships 172 187 171 177 177 245 34 314 5-9999 GT Cargo ships 15 27 4 14 14 181 35 233 1-24999 GT Cargo ships 1.............. Passengerships and ferries.............. 155 25 GT and over Cargo ships................ xxvi

Visit to the port of Landskrona Calls in Landskrona 3 25 BT 2 15 1 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 5 Less than 25 BT 25-499 BT 5-1499 BT 15-4999 BT 5-9999 BT 1-24999 BT More than 25 BT xxvii

Appendix 12: General description of Bayesian network A Bayesian Network is a graphical representation of uncertain quantities reveals explicitly the probabilistic dependence between the set variables is designed as a knowledge representation of the considered problem A BN is a network with directed arcs and no cycles The nodes represents random variables and/or decisions Arcs into random variables indicate probabilistic dependence Causal modelling most effectively does the model building Bayesian networks offer 1. Allows one to learn about causal relationships. -This knowledge allow to make predictions in the presence of interventions / observations 2. BN in conjunction with Bayesian statistical techniques facilitate the combination of domain knowledge and data -prior or domain knowledge 3. BN can readily handle incomplete data -missing data 4. Bayesian methods in conjunction with BN and other methods offers efficient methods to avoid over fitting of data xxviii

Appendix 13: Bayesian network for frequency models xxix

Ship traffic distribution network xxx

Human failure network xxxi

Ship collision crossing ships calculation of geometrical diameter xxxii

Ship collision crossing ships frequency calculation xxxiii

Ship collision passing ships frequency calculation xxxiv

Ship-obstacle collision grounding ships frequency calculation xxxv

Appendix 14: Bayesian network for consequence models xxxvi

Ship collision passing and crossing ships consequence calculation xxxvii

Ship collision grounding ships consequence calculation xxxviii

Appendix 15: Accident costs in Norwegian waters Cost element Oil tanker Bulk Carrier Passenger Vessel Fishing Vessel Typical accident Rescue operations.5.5.1.1.1 Clean-up costs Damage to ship and cargo Personal damage /loss of lives Environmental damage 8.5.6 1.2.13 1.2 25 7.2 2.5.36 3.6.85.17 1.7.8.85 17 4.5 1.2.24 2.4 Total cost 51.85 12.52 6.7 1.54 8.15 Estimates of different costs (in NOK million) for accidents involving different ship types in Norwegian waters, ref. [6]. 4 4 1 NOK 1 DKK xxxix