Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority

Similar documents
Newcastle International Airport Airspace Change Proposal Consultation Feedback report November 2017

Airspace Change Proposal by Shoreham Aerodrome (Brighton City Airport Ltd)

Prestwick Lower Airspace Systemisation (PLAS) Future Airspace Strategy Implementation North (FASI-N)

CAA AIRSPACE CHANGE DECISION

Consultation Document

APPENDIX 1: STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGED ON IPA DESIGN PRINCIPLES

Southampton Airport Airspace Change Proposal. Date: 8 th October 2013

STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION

FASI(N) IoM/Antrim Systemisation Airspace Change Decision

Airspace Change Proposal Extending Class C Stubs STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION

GENERAL AVIATION ALLIANCE Partnership in Aviation

EXETER AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL FAILURE OF ADHERENCE TO THE CONSULTATION PROCESS (CAP 725)

Figure 1 AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL STANSTED TMZ. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION FEEDBACK Issue 1. EGSS TMZ Stakeholder Consultation Feedback

AIRSPACE INFRINGEMENTS BACKGROUND STATISTICS

STANSTED AIRSPACE Proposal for Implementation of a Transponder Mandatory Zone STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION

CAA stakeholder engagement Draft airspace modernisation strategy

AIRSPACE INFRINGEMENTS BACKGROUND STATISTICS

CAA DECISION LETTER MANSTON KENT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (KIA) RNAV (GNSS) HOLD AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL

DONG Energy Walney Extension (UK) Ltd. Walney Extension Offshore Wind Farm Transponder Mandatory Zone (TMZ) Stakeholder Consultation

Safety & Airspace Regulation Group

NATMAC INFORMATIVE INTRODUCTION OF STANSTED TRANSPONDER MANDATORY ZONE (TMZ)

Consultation on revised hold and link routes in Scottish TMA

GLASGOW AIRSPACE Proposal for Reclassification of the Glasgow Control Area from Class E to Class D

AIRSPACE CO-ORDINATION NOTICE Safety and Airspace Regulation Group ACN Reference: Version: Date: Date of Original

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group a three year vision ( ) Mark Swan Director Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 1

Proposed Changes to Inverness Airport s Airspace The Introduction of Controlled Airspace and Optimisation of Instrument Flight Procedures

CAA Strategy and Policy

LAMP 2 - FASI(S) Network

Consultation on air display and low flying permission charges

CAP 1616: Airspace Design: Guidance on the regulatory process for changing airspace design including community engagement requirements

An updated estimate of Heathrow and Gatwick s WACC

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Safety & Airspace Regulation Group Code of Practice. Issue 13, August 2013 CAP 1089

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Post Consultation Report. Hawarden Airport. Proposal to Adopt GNSS Approaches and amend Conventional Instrument Flight Procedures at Hawarden Airport

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group

4.1 This document outlines when a proposal for a SID Truncation may be submitted and details the submission requirements.

SAFETY AND AIRSPACE REGULATION GROUP

Survey Summary Aeroplane performance

NZQA unit standard version 3 Page 1 of 5. Apply knowledge of air law to the certification of aeronautical maintenance

CRD NPA 05/ / Theisen Andre-Cargolux Airlines S.A. (No paragraph affected). Header on pages 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7. Text changed.

CAA MINDED TO REJECT EDINBURGH AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

CONTROLLED AIRSPACE CONTAINMENT POLICY

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

BGA Strategy. What is this document for, and how was it developed? Page 1 of 5. BGA Strategy V1 Final October 2017

Gatwick Airport Limited operator determination

SAFETY AND AIRSPACE REGULATION GROUP

CAA DECISION LETTER. LUTON RUNWAY 26 BROOKMANS PARK RNAV1 SIDs AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL

Draft airspace design guidance consultation

AIRPORT OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

PPLAOG28 Maintain flight control operations and operating conditions

Aviation Trends Quarter

2016 Manawatu Airspace Review

Consultation for Terminal Control North (TCN) Airspace Change Proposal

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

2016 Waikato and Bay of Plenty Airspace Review v1.1

Airspace change process: Information pack. CAP 1465b

2018 Nelson and Marlborough Airspace Review Initial consultation

Sunshine Coast Airport Master Plan September 2007

GUIDANCE ON CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (CAA) PLANNING CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS. 2 August Introduction

Heathrow s Blueprint for noise reduction. Ten practical steps to cut noise in 2016/17

NDS Subject to NOTAM: No

Methodology and coverage of the survey. Background

London 2012 Olympics CAS(T) Proposal

Explanatory Note to Decision 2015/019/R. CS-25 Amendment 17

CAA consultation on its Environmental Programme

DVOR Rationalisation and NDB Withdrawal. NATS Update SAM, OCK, LON. NATMAC 83 1 st June NATS Project Manager NATS Airspace Change Specialist

BRITISH GLIDING ASSOCIATION COMPETITIONS 2016 (OUTSIDE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE) Subject to NOTAM: Yes (by Airspace Regulation)

Framework Brief. Edinburgh SIDs

Walney Offshore Airspace Change Framework Briefing

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Proposed Airspace Change Process for Instrument Approaches To Runways 24 and 06. Subject Category Notes Action to be Taken

Airspace Consultation Feedback Report Part A (Full Version) Analysis & Summary of Responses

Air Operator Certification

Present: Dame Deirdre Hutton

A1/3 Page D - 3 Issue 7 AL19 30/03/2007

Guidance material for land use at or near aerodromes

Explanatory Note to Decision 2017/021/R

AIRSPACE. Aviation Consultancy at its best. Specialist aviation support to help solve problems for airports and airport developers

DECISIONS ON AIR TRANSPORT LICENCES AND ROUTE LICENCES 4/99

Airport accessibility report 2017/18

TAG Guidance Notes on responding to the Civil Aviation Authority s consultation on its Five Year Strategy

PLUME RISE ASSESSMENTS


Outcome of the CAA consultation on proposals for a revised airspace change process

Terms of Reference for rulemaking task RMT.0325 (OPS.057(a)) & RMT.0326 (OPS.057(b))

PDF - MANAGEMENT CASE BIRMINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MANUALS DOCUMENT

1.2 Some of the figures included in this publication may be provisional and revised in later issues.

BMAA Posts, Representatives and Sub-Committees

Contents. Subpart A General 91.1 Purpose... 7

Classification: Public AIRSPACE AND FUTURE OPERATIONS CONSULTATION (JANUARY-MARCH 2019)

The explanations of other terms used throughout the tables are contained in the section on Definitions immediately following the tables.

Safety Management 1st edition

CAT E Subject to NOTAM: No

BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED

Heathrow Airport Property

Guidance for Complexity and Density Considerations - in the New Zealand Flight Information Region (NZZC FIR)

Transcription:

Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority Consultation Feedback Report Version 1.0 23 rd September 2013 Prepared by Brad Taylor Airspace Change Assurance, OS&D NATS Protected

2 Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority Prepared by: Brad Taylor Airspace Change Assurance, OS&D Version 1.0 23 rd September 2013

Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority 3 Table of contents 1.0 Introduction 4 2.0 Consultation Documentation 5 2.1 Email Sent to NATMAC Members 5 2.2 Introduction on NATS Consultation Page 6 2.3 Consultation Document 6 3.0 Overview of Responses 7 3.1 Total Reponses to the Consultation 7 3.2 Breakdown of Responses to the Consultation 8 3.3 Conclusion of Reponses and Comments 8 4.0 Further Correspondence and Feedback 9 Appendices 10 Appendix A: Response Matrix 10 Appendix B: Consultation Document 12

4 Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority 1.0 Introduction From 7 th May 2013 to 30 th July 2013, NATS conducted a consultation soliciting feedback on a proposal to remove partial, timed, control of two blocks of airspace from the Military and to place their control with NATS, H24. To this effect an email was sent to members of the NATMAC detailing the proposed change. The requirement for the airspace stems from the peaks and troughs in traffic flow which define en-route air traffic control within the UK. It is during these busy periods that NATS would make maximum use of the airspace in question being available and it is during some of these periods that NATS is currently restricted from using it. The proposal aims to rectify this situation. NATS is planning to implement this change by 6 th February 2014. The airspace in question is detailed in Figure 1. Figure 1: Detail of Airspace Blocks to be Controlled by NATS, H24

Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority 5 2.0 Consultation Documentation 2.1 Email Sent to NATMAC Members The following email was prepared and sent to all current NATMAC members (see Appendix A: Response Matrix for a list of members who were corresponded with): Dear Colleague, NATS Terminal Control (TC) Midlands Sectors currently share access to two volumes of Class C airspace with the Military to the east of route N601, in the vicinity of East Midlands Airport and RAF Wittering. A schedule of open and closed times dictates when both parties can access this airspace. Prompted by a lack of use of the airspace by the military and the knowledge that civil aircraft will benefit from its extended use, this proposal intends to make NATS the sole controlling authority, with permanent (H24) access to these Class C airspace volumes, for civil air traffic. The major stakeholder of the airspace, the MOD, is supportive of this change. The consultation started on the 7 th May 2013 and will run for 12 weeks until 30 th July 2013. Please use the link below to access the consultation document. We request that you consider the details contained within the consultation document and reply to indicate whether your organisation supports, objects to or has no objection to the proposal. In the case of either Support or ion, please provide your basis for that view, so that your opinions can be considered in the on-going development of this proposal. http://www.nats.co.uk/environment/consultations/airway-n601/ When responding to this consultation please use the text below and reply directly to this email address. Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority, Response I am responding on behalf of <Organisation Name in Here> and we: DO NOT OBJECT to SUPPORT [Please state reasons for your support] OBJECT to [Please state reasons for your objection] [Delete as applicable] the Airway N601 Revision to controlling authority proposal, as detailed in the consultation document. <NATS NATMAC Code>

6 Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority 2.2 Introduction on NATS Consultation Page Members of NATMAC who followed the link to the NATS consultation website were presented with the following landing page details: TC Improvements: Airway November 601 (N601) Revision to Operating Times NATS Terminal Control (TC) Midlands Sectors currently share access to two volumes of Class C airspace with the Military to the east of route N601, in the vicinity of East Midlands Airport and RAF Wittering. A schedule of open and closed times dictates when both parties can access this airspace. Prompted by a lack of use of the airspace by the military and the knowledge that civil aircraft will benefit from its extended use, this proposal intends to make NATS the sole controlling authority, with permanent (H24) access to these Class C airspace volumes, for civil air traffic. This consultation will run from 7 th May 2013 to 30 th July 2013. Once the consultation is closed the feedback received will be analysed and a feedback report prepared and sent to SARG along with the change proposal for consideration. The feedback report will then be made available on this site in due course. <Link to download document> 2.3 Consultation Document The consultation document which NATMAC members would have downloaded is embedded in Appendix B: Consultation Document.

Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority 7 3.0 Overview of Responses 3.1 Total Reponses to the Consultation The initial email distribution of the stakeholder consultation document was sent to organisations and individuals represented by the National Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee (NATMAC). 35 stakeholders were involved in the consultation (representing 27 organisations some organisations having multiple representation); of these 4 responded at the initial request for feedback and a further 6 people responded following receipt of a chaser email, four weeks before the end of the consultation. 10 people in total responded to the consultation. The number of responses are summarised in the pie chart at Figure 2. Figure 2: Total Responses to the Consultation

8 Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority 3.2 Breakdown of Responses to the Consultation The consultation requested feedback on only one possible option for the airspace change; that was to implement the change to the airspace as shown in Figure 1, H24, or not. The responses (support /no objection /object) to the change are summarised in Figure 3, below. This shows that there were no objections to the proposal and that the responders were evenly split with either Support or No ion to the change. Figure 3: Breakdown of Responses to the Consultation 3.3 Conclusion of Reponses and Comments All of the comments were either neutral or supported the change and there were no objections raised, therefore NATS intends to submit an ACP based upon the information presented within the consultation document, without change.

Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority 9 4.0 Further Correspondence and Feedback In the event that a representative organisation wishes to present new evidence or data to the Director of Airspace Policy, for consideration prior to making his regulatory decision regarding this proposal, the representative organisation must submit, in writing or via email, the information to the following address: Hd of Airspace Policy, Coordination & Consultation Directorate of Airspace Policy CAA House 45-59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE e-mail: airspacepolicy@caa.co.uk

10 Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority Appendices Appendix A: Response Matrix Unique ID NATMAC01 Organisation Name Airport Operators Association OBJ/NC/SUPT NATS Response (1, 2, 3 ) Thanks NATMAC02 AOA NATMAC03 AOPAUK NATMAC04 NATMAC04 Aviation Environment Federation Aviation Environment Federation NATMAC05 BA Support Thanks NATMAC07 BAE Systems NATMAC08 BALPA Support Thanks NATMAC09 BATA NATMAC10 BBAC Thanks NATMAC11 BBGA NATMAC11 BBGA NATMAC12 BGA Support NATMAC12 BGA Support NATMAC12 BGA Support Reply from John Williams - replied with Thanks Reply from John Williams - replied with Thanks Reply from John Williams - replied with Thanks NATMAC13 NATMAC14 BHPA BMAA

Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority 11 NATMAC15 BMFA NATMAC16 BPA NATMAC17 NATMAC18 British Helicopter Association European UAV Systems Centre Ltd Thanks NATMAC19 GASCo NATMAC20 GATCO NATMAC20 GATCO NATMAC20 GATCO NATMAC21 HCGB NATMAC06 NATMAC22 NATMAC23 NATMAC23 NATMAC23 NATMAC24 NATMAC25 Heathrow Airport Ltd Heavy Airlines LAA LAA LAA Light Airlines Low Fares Airlines Support Support Thanks Reply received from John Brady - Replied with thanks Reply received from John Brady - Replied with thanks Reply received from John Brady - Replied with thanks Thanks NATMAC26 PPL/IR NATMAC27 UKFSC/GAP AN Thanks

12 Airway N601: Revision to Controlling Authority Appendix B: Consultation Document Embedded below is a PDF version of the consultation document which was made available to the NATMAC members for comment.