CONTENT. What are T-values? Computation of T- values

Similar documents
The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 2 Presentation 1

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Incident Final Report

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A02P0290 GEAR-UP LANDING

Feasibility and Benefits of a Cockpit Traffic Display-Based Separation Procedure for Single Runway Arrivals and Departures

IATA Air Carrier Self Audit Checklist Analysis Questionnaire

Application for the inclusion of the A330 Aeroplane Type in Aircraft Rating (In Flight Cruise Relief Only) of a Pilot s Licence (Aeroplanes)

MetroAir Virtual Airlines

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

CANSO Workshop on Operational Performance. LATCAR, 2016 John Gulding Manager, ATO Performance Analysis Federal Aviation Administration

All-Weather Operations Training Programme

Flight Operations in Low Visibility Conditions

Managing And Understand The Impact Of Of The Air Air Traffic System: United Airline s Perspective

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 3 Presentation 1

Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

5.1 Approach Hazards Awareness - General

Fatigue Management. 19 March :00am 12:00pm PRESENTED BY: Captain Jim Mangie Delta Air Lines

Head-up Guidance & Vision Technologies Enabling Safer and More Efficient Airline Operations

Human external cargo draft

Evaluation of Strategic and Tactical Runway Balancing*

Airports Council International

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

STABLE APPROACHES. Captain Alan Stealey DSVP Flight Operations Emirates Airline

Modelling Airline Network Routing and Scheduling under Airport Capacity Constraints

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 2 Presentation 2

IHSS 2009 Helicopter EMS in Canada. S. Seguin

Airport Engineering Lectures

The Ongoing SMS. Thursday, January 16, PRESENTED BY: Joseph N Briggs - VP Aviation, C&S Wholesale Grocers Inc.

Using PBN for Terminal and Extended Terminal Operations

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH Education, Analysis and Research for the Next Frontier. Airport Capacity. Outline/Notes for Class

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

Have Descents Really Become More Efficient? Presented by: Dan Howell and Rob Dean Date: 6/29/2017

SERA Implementation. Jersey Aero Club Brief

Reserve Pilot Scheduling

REPORT A-024/2012 DATA SUMMARY

Making the World A better place to live SFO

Class F3K Hand Launch Gliders 5.7. CLASS F3K - HAND LAUNCH GLIDERS

GENERAL INFORMATION Aircraft #1 Aircraft #2

APPLICATION FOR LOW. Application received, Date:

Approximate Network Delays Model

Description of the National Airspace System

ATP CTP CRJ-200 FSTD 1 Briefing Guide

TravelWise Travel wisely. Travel safely.

Chapter 6. Nonradar. Section 1. General DISTANCE

Elite Air Taxi. Flight Standard Operating Procedures (FSOP) Version January 2017 NOT FOR REAL WORLD USE

Key Issues for the Critical Path Approach, Landing and Go-Arounds

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

System Oriented Runway Management: A Research Update

Growing Size and Complexity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Airports Council International North America Air Cargo Facilities and Security Survey

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A05O0257 RUNWAY OVERRUN

DEPARTMENT OF AIR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION

Operational and Training Considerations for Safe Go-Around Procedures

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION MINIMA

Transit Vehicle Scheduling: Problem Description

Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

Tailstrike on landing, Boeing , June 5, 2001

ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRIUBTION OF FLIGHTPLAN ROUTE SELECTION ON ENROUTE DELAYS USING RAMS

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS

Efficiency and Environment KPAs

Learning Objectives. By the end of this presentation you should understand:

UPDATE ON THE 6 IDEAS (1-4) NAV CANADA

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A01Q0165 LOSS OF CONTROL AND STALL

FAA Call to Action on Runway Safety Short-term Actions. By Glenn Michaël (FAA)

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

Human Factors in Aviation. A CAANZ Perspective

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

AVIATION OCCURRENCE REPORT

Tailored Arrivals (TA)

FACTUAL REPORT AVIATION

Crosswind-based wake avoidance system approved by the FAA for operational use. Clark Lunsford (MITRE) & Dr. Edward Johnson May 15-16, 2013

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

Airline Scheduling Optimization ( Chapter 7 I)

Evidence for the Safety- Capacity Trade-Off in the Air Transportation System

LFMN / Nice Côte-d Azur / NCE

Notification of the Department of Air Transport. Re: Flight Operations Officer or Dispatcher Training Program

Operational Procedures

Application of the reduced runway separation minima at the Sheremetyevo airport RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Airport Runway Location and Orientation. CEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design

BUILDING LOCAL RUNWAY EXCURSION ACTION PLAN UNSTABILISED APPROACHES. Lisbon, 4 th Dec 2013

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

Introduction Fly By Wire Aircraft & New Technology

PPLAOG28 Maintain flight control operations and operating conditions

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

Approach-and-Landing Briefing Note Response to GPWS Pull-Up Maneuver Training

Investigation Report

Tailstrike on landing, Boeing APF, December 25, 1994

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Incident Final Report

CFIT-Procedure Design Considerations. Use of VNAV on Conventional. Non-Precision Approach Procedures

FAA SAFO Turbojet Braking Performance on Wet Runway SAPOE Recommendations

Flight Inspection for High Elevation Airports

Why You Hate your Flight Review (and what you can do about it) Richard Carlson SSF Chairman

CAAC China. CCAR 121 Subpart P Crew members Flight and Duty time Limits, and Rest Requirements Revision Oct-2017

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

Global Airline Capacity Winter 2013/14 Boeing Commercial Airplanes

USAF Aero Club Local Procedures Exam Updated February 2017

Transcription:

CONTENT 2 What are T-values? Computation of T- values 2

WHAT ARE T-VALUES? 3

T-values are the required inputs to FORAS system FORAS Ex 2 They are obtained from operational databases (called D-Values) by directly using or deriving from the data TC5 (Airport Recency) is computed based on the following two D-values : Date of this flight When did the pilot visit this airport last time 4

Retrieve directly from the operational databases Computation based on D-values Artificial conversion of the original data 5

Computation of T-VALUES 6

37 related to Crew } 7 related to Sector related to Aircraft 55 in total 7

Experience level is determined based on seniority at rank. Experience Level Captain SFO First Officer Level < 3 years < 2 years < 4 years Level 2 3 years and < 5 years 2 years and < 4 years 4 years and < 6 years Level 3 5 years 4 years 6 years 8

2.8 4.6 6.4 8.2 RATING new moderate experienced Let n = crew size Let h = number of L3 pilots in the crew. Let m = number of L2 pilots in the crew. Let l = number of L pilots in the crew. Let v = 3 h +2 m +l TC = ((v - n)/2n 9) + 9

Effectiveness of crew composition by rank. Greater rating implies greater effectiveness. Size2 Crew Combination Composition Table Rating 3 Crew CCT3 Captain, FO 4 Captain, SFO 4 Captain, Captain 2 Size3 Combination Rating Captain, SFO, FO 4 Captain, SFO, SFO 4 Captain, Captain, FO 3 Captain, Captain, SFO 3 Captain, Captain, Captain 2 Captain, FO, FO 3 Size4 Combination Rating Captain, SFO, FO, FO 4 Captain, SFO, SFO, FO 4 Captain, SFO, SFO, SFO 4 Captain, Captain, SFO, FO 3 Captain, Captain, FO, FO 3 Captain, Captain, SFO, SFO 3 Captain, Captain, Captain, SFO 2 Captain, Captain, Captain, FO 2 Captain, Captain, Captain, Captain

Rating poor mid ideal 4 3.4 2.7.4 2 3 4 5 RATING poor mid ideal

Determined as the minimum proficiency score among the entire cockpit crew. Rating = min {proficiency scores among crew} 4 5 6 basic moderate good RATING 2

The number of visits by the pilot to the arrival airport in the past 2 months. 3 6 9 2 low moderate high TIMES / ONE YEAR 3

The number of flying hours on this craft type 2 3 4 low moderate high HOURS 4

Accumulated flying hours after joining Eva 2 3 4 5 6 low moderate high HOURS 5

The number of landings as PF in this fleet. 5 5 2 low moderate high SECTORS 6

The number of sectors have been completed on this duty day. 2 low moderate high SECTORS 7

The number of duty hours (since reporting) already in this duty day at time of departure 2 4 6 8 2 low moderate high HOURS 8

The number of hours of pre-flight rest over the legal MRR of the pilot. 2 4 6 8 minimal optimal HOURS 9

Pilot s even share of available rest time (flight time minus.5 hours). 2 4 6 minimal adequate HOURS 2

The number of duty hours in this flight. For example, a pilot is scheduled to operate 2 sectors, TPE to BKK and BKK to AMS for this duty. The duty hours of the flight from TPE to BKK should include flight time and briefing time in TPE, and the duty hours of the flight from BKK to AMS should include flight time and transit time in BKK. low high 6 2 8 HOURS 2

Sum (schedule changes of the fleet) / The number of pilots in this fleet. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 stable moderate unstable U 22

The number of days since the recent extended rest. recent 5 5 2 notrecent DAYS 23

The number of hours that a pilot has flown in the previous 7 days. light 2 moderate 24 severe 28 32 36 HOURS 24

The number of hours that a pilot has flown in the previous 3 days. light 45 moderate 55 severe 65 HOURS 75 85 95 25

This is the number of actual geographic time zones crossed in the previous 7 days. TPE to JFK has 2 time zones crossed. TPE to JFK and back to TPE has 24 geographic time zones crossed. 5 5 2 ZONES light moderate severe 26

Exemplary Schedule Date Duty Sectors Date Duty Sectors S 698 ANC-DFW 6M LO LAX- LO DFW- 7T LO LAX- 2M 67 DFW-ATL 8W 69 LAX- LO ATL- 9T 69 LAX- 3T LO ATL- 2F 69 -TPE 4W LO ATL- 2S 668 TPE-ANC 5T 667 ATL-ANC LO ANC- LO ANC- 22S 667 ANC- 6F 66 ANC- 23M 667 -KIX 7S 66 ANC- 667 KIX-TPE 8S 66 -TPE 24T CRI TPE- 27 TPE-MNL 25W DO - 9M BDO - 26T MON TPE- T BDO - 698 TPE-ANC W BDO - LO ANC- 272 MNL-TPE 697 ANC- 2T IOI TPE- 27F 697 -TPE 3F 67 TPE-BKK 28S BDO - LO BKK- 29S BDO - 4S 632 BKK-TPE 3M BDO - 5S 62 TPE-ANC 3T BDO - 62 ANC-LAX LO LAX- GTZ#=3 GTZ#= GTZ#= SUM=3 AVG = 3/3 = MAX = 3 27

This is an average of actual geographic time zones crossed per sectors flown in the previous 7 days. TPE to JFK has 2 time zones crossed. The average time zones crossed from TPE to JFK and back to TPE is 2..5 3 4.5 6 light moderate severe ZONES 28

This is the maximum of Geographic time zones crossed in any sector flown in the previous 7 days..5 3 4.5 6 ZONES light moderate severe 29

.5 2 2.5 3 not good good U 3

2 3 4 5 6 not fluent fluent U 3

2 3 4 U low moderate high Use the arrival airport and runway as identifiers Look up RWT table Factors affect complexity Crossed runways Parallel runway number (e.g. ATLANTA has 4 parallel runways) 32

33

A particular arrival area has a convective weather season The scheduled arrival date and time (actual time, if available) occurs during that season.5 not significant significant U 34

Cross wind, which is calculated by wind direction, wind speed, and wind gusts at arrival airport at arrival time, is measured by knots. 5 2 KNOTS 25 3 35 low moderate high 35

Ambient light at arrival airport at arrival time. Based on the time of sunrise and sunset. Twilight is defined as sunrise and sunset times ±3 minutes..5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 light twilight dark U 36

Ceiling height conditions at arrival airport at arrival time. The rating is the difference from the minimum. 2 3 4 5 6 FEET near minima good 37

Visibility conditions at arrival airport at arrival time. The rating is the difference from the minimum (6 ft.). 4 8 2 6 near minima moderate good METER 38

If there is precipitation at the time of arrival, it is of type none, rain, or snow..5.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 none rain snow PRECIP 39

degree Determine the flying complexity of the approach ILS availability no.5 u yes 4

A higher go-around rate implies a greater flying complexity of the sector. Airport, approach, and fleet as identifiers in the look-up table. low..2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 high VALUE 4

degree Are there significant terrain issues at the approach at arrival airport? The values : -> not significant, -> significant, (default is ).5 not significant significant u 42

degree When there is heavy rain at landing, arrival airport with grooved runways is considered to yield better braking action. Yes.5 No u 43

TA = Sum (Non_weather_MEL_arr_score + if rain then Sum(weaher_MEL_Arr_score)) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 low moderate high SCORE 44

45