Together to protect the old taiga forest, and to promote dialogue, common understanding, and collaboration at the European Union borders

Similar documents
EUROPARC Federation. Director Carol Ritchie

Barents Euro-Arctic Council Tenth Meeting of the Ministers of the Environment 9 November 2011 Umeå. Declaration

TransParcNet European network of transboundary areas

BARENTS EURO-ARCTIC COUNCIL

TRANSBOUDARY COOPERATION OF RUSSIAN PROTECTED AREAS

Report NPS/SWI meeting May Mats-Rune Bergström Ellinor Bomark

JOINT STATEMENT BARENTS EURO ARCTIC COUNCIL. SECOND SESSION 14th 15th SEPTEMBER 1994 TROMSO, NORWAY

Sustainable recreational use and benefits of Natura 2000 network

What is ArcticSkills?

Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Romania-Ukraine. Presentation of cross-border cooperation concepts DDBRA & Ukraine

Developing quality tourism products in protected nature areas

Barents Euro Arctic Council 11 th Session Rovaniemi, Finland November 2007

BEAC Joint Working Group on Education and Research ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Ecotourism Australia our next few years

FINAL PRESS CONFERENCE TO FINISH THE PROJECT

Protected Areas & Ecotourism

Project Concept Note

APPENDIX I ROADMAP FOR INTEGRATION OF TOURISM SECTOR

BABIA GÓRA DECLARATION ON SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN MOUNTAIN AREAS

Integrated financing of Natura 2000 sites experiences and insights from Finland

Tourism and Wetlands

Workshop 14 The Wilderness Value in Protected Areas. Laponia, World Heritage Site

Agreement on the operation of the Kolarctic CBC Programme Branch Office in Norway

Summary Report on Workshop

Dr. Lkhagvasuren Badamjav Leading Scientist, Institute of Biology Mongolian Academy of Sciences

Official Journal of the European Union L 337/43

Online Application Form

APEC Sub-Committee on Customs Procedures (SCCP) Clark Freeport Zone, Philippines January 2015

Towards Strengthened Governance of the Shared Trans-boundary Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Lake Ohrid Region

Group of specialists European diploma on protected areas CoE, Strasbourg, 8 March 2017

Baltic 21 Lighthouse Project AGORA 2.0. Heritage Tourism for Increased BSR Identity

Resolution XI.7. Tourism, recreation and wetlands

Metsähallitus,Natural Resource Planning for Finnish Lapland* * Excluding the Sami homeland

Monitoring National Park Visitors in Metsähallitus

We, Ministers, assembled in Berlin for the International Conference on Biodiversity and Tourism from 6 to 8 March 1997

THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECOLOGICAL NETWORK IN SERBIA

Sweden. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Priority Area Tourism in the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: State of Implementation and Perspectives

Chairmanship Priorities. Finnmark

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

Nature Conservation Agency (NCA) Salacgrīva 05/07/2018

Tourism Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region

JOINT STATEMENT BY THE BARENTS REGIONAL COUNCIL AT THE BEAC 13TH SESSION 11 October 2011, Kiruna

Action plan for sustainable tourism on Suomenlinna

Project Bulgarian - Swiss partnership for development of the Gea Chelonia Foundation Tortoise centre

STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT OF THE CARPATHIANS

THE INTERNATIONAL BARENTS SECRETARIAT ANNUAL REPORT Tomas Hallberg

A Proposed Framework for the Development of Joint Cooperation On Nature Conservation and Sustainable Tourism At World Heritage Natural sites.

Terms of Reference (ToR) for a Short-Term assignment

Attracting tourists all year round challenges and opportunities in seasonality and responsibility

Cross border cooperation between Ukraine and Moldova: achievements, opportunities and problems DANUBE FINANCING AND CAPACITY BUILDING DIALOGUE

Final declaration of the Danube Summit on 6 th May 2009 in Ulm. Preamble

Monica Mæland, Minister of Local Government and Modernisation (Norway)

Ohrid Lake and Prespa Lake, Sub basin s on Crn Drim river basin International Workshop, Sarajevo, Bosna and Hercegovina May 2009

The 13th EU China Business and Technology Cooperation Fair. Chengdu Sep

Valdichiana Living THE INNOVATION OF THE TOURISM OFFER THROUGH THE CLUSTERING OF SMES AND OF TOURISM PRODUCTS:

Integrated Management of Shared Lakes Basins. Ohrid and Prespa Lake -Transboundary Cooperation-

Planning and Managing Tourism in Protected Areas

Lake Ohrid. our shared responsibilities and benefits. Protecting

The results of the National Tourism Development Strategy Assessments

Flagship Project Strategies for Sustainable Tourism Flagship Project 12.10: Strategies for Sustainable Tourism

I. The Danube Area: an important potential for a strong Europe

Estonia. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Sub-regional Meeting on the Caribbean Action Plan for World Heritage November Havana, Cuba DRAFT CONCEPT PAPER

Management of Tourism Development in Cultural and Natural Heritage Sites in Cambodia. Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran October 2014

Biosphere Reserves of India : Complete Study Notes

Credit No IN. National Project Director 9,Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi Tel:

RUF DER WILDNIS! Nationalparks Austria Jahreskonferenz Oikean villi: Wilderness and national parks Finland

TABLE 5.1. Emissions of Major Atmospheric Pollutants (in Millions of Metric Tonnes per Year)

Nature Conservation and Regional Development in Floodplains and Wetlands in the Central and Lower Danube River Basin

Unmanned Aircraft: Regulatory Framework in the EU EASA team High Level Conference on Drones Warsaw 24 November 2016

QUÉBEC DECLARATION ON ECOTOURISM World Ecotourism Summit Québec City, Canada, 2002

Danube River Basin. a source for transboundary cooperation. Exploring the Results and Potential for Transboundary Water Management Cooperation

Crossing Borders - Regional Tourism Cooperation. Experiences and Examples of regional tourism agendas, plans and strategies.

Regional cykelstrategi. David Schubert Project Manager County Administrative Board of Stockholm, Sweden

THE MILESTONES OF INDONESIA SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DESTINATION

Participatory Protected Area Management in Barra del Colorado Wildlife Refuge, Costa Rica A protected area with people

Latvia s Health Tourism Cluster

Workshop on Coastal and Maritime Tourism Cooperation Introductory statement

Protected Area Network in Finland

APEC Tourism Working Group & PECC Agenda

Belarus seminar on transboundary wetland sites

RESEARCH REPORT. Globalization: Creating a Common Language. Sustainability Committee. Promoting ecotourism as a tool for sustainable environment

How should the proposed protected area be administered and managed?

Sustainable Arctic Expedition Cruise Operations

First Meeting of Advisory Committee

REGIONAL AGREEMENT AND FRAMEWORK FOR MARINE MAMMALS CONSERVATION IN THE WCR: THE SPAW PROTOCOL AND THE MARINE MAMMAL ACTION PLAN

Section 1 Introduction to Sustainable Tourism

AIR Citizen s Summary

SUSTAINABLE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY TOURISM IN THE COASTAL ZONES OF THE BALTIC SEA AREA

Qingdao Sep Chengdu Sep

Evian Encounter 2006 The Carpathian Wetland Initiative

TOURISM DEVELOPMENT, SUSTAINABILITY AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES Case studies from Finnish Lapland

IUCN Red List status of European bees

Foto: Hanse-Sail, Rostock. The contribution of tourism to economic development in the Baltic Sea Region under the Europe 2020 Strategy

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999

PARKS & BENEFITS. Part-financed. by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund)

DANUBE FREE SKY. The Danube Protected Areas initiative for bird conservation at powerlines along the Danube River

Transboundary River Management in the Danube Basin

Zhulieta Harasani, MBA PhD. Petrit Harasani The shared Transboundary Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Lake Ohrid Region

Transcription:

Together to protect the old taiga forest, and to promote dialogue, common understanding, and collaboration at the European Union borders Webinar on Transboundary Cooperation November 20 th 2017 Riina Tervo, Metsähallitus, Parks & Wildlife Finland

Riina Tervo Metsähallitus, Parks & Wildlife, Finland Marina Trusova Pasvik Zapovednik, Russia Tiia Kalske County Governor of Finnmark, Norway Rolf Sch. Kollstrøm Øvre Pasvik National park Board, Norway

Pasvik-Inari Trilateral Park covers an area of 1 890 km 2

Vätsäri wilderness area Øvre Pasvik national park Øvre Pasvik landscape protection area Pasvik nature reserve Pasvik zapovednik IUCN category VI II IV I a I a Established 1991 1970 2003 1993 1992 Size 1 550 km 2 119 km 2 54 km 2 19 km 2 147 km 2 Main infrastructure 35 km of marked hiking trails, Transborder Piilola trail; 4 open wilderness cabins and one rental hut; Siida Sámi museum and Nature Centre in the village of Inari 12 km of marked hiking trails, Transborder Piilola trail; ~10 km of skiing routes and 2 open wilderness cabins; Øvre Pasvik National Park Centre in the village of Svanvik 5 km of marked hiking trails, ~5 km of skiing routes 2 km of marked hiking trail to bird watching hide and an old bear s den Varlam Island nature and culture site; Visitor Centre & Ecological School in Rajakoski; Nature Centre in the city of Nikel Other characteristics: Managers are governmental organisations except the local political board for Øvre Pasvik national park One municipality concerned in each country Remote, wilderness-like areas: c. 9 500 visits to NPAs, all visitor centres c. 126 300 visits in 2016. Sámi home area: management of npas, traditional livelihoods, culture and languages

Borders separate. Nature unites! Pasvik Nature Reserve (NO) and Pasvik zapovednik (RU) along the Pasvik river, at the Norwegian Russian border. Photo: Rolf E. Sch. Kollstrøm

COLLABORATION

The first joint expedition in 1990 s

Active development of the cooperation Aim at full-filling the criteria in TB Parks programme Promotion of nature protection and sustainable nature tourism in the Inari-Pasvik area project funded by EU Interreg III A Nord Kolarctic Neighbourhood programme (2006 2008) Cooperative agreement between managers of NPAs in 2008 Action plan for 2008 2018 Establishment of Pasvik-Inari Trilateral Park in 2008 Certified as EUROPARC s transboundary park in 2008 re-certification in 2013 re-evaluation in 2018 Wearein thesameboat.

Main objectives in Pasvik-Inari co-operation highlighted in the action plan Promote transboundary cooperation and contacts at all levels: nature managers, researches, municipalities, stakeholders, nature tourism entrepreneurs and locals Preserve the natural and cultural values of the area on a long-term basis through sustainable management and monitoring of the environment Present, distribute and exchange knowledge about the area externally and promote the recognition of the area Improve the facilities and infrastructure of the area to make it more accessible and user-friendly Contribute to strengthening the economic development of the area by promoting sustainable nature tourism https://prosjekt.fylkesmannen.no/documents/pasvik%20-%20inari/dokument/pasvik-inari%20action%20plan%20en%20print%20version%20180308.pdf

Trilateral cooperation in action Nature protection and management, incl. monitoring and research Brown bear, waterfowl and golden eagle; bird ringing; visitor monitoring Habitat and species mappings - data exchange and informing of results Environmental enlightenment Environmental school, ecological camps, network under Phenology of North Calotte, information materials, events such as bird watching day in World s environment day Promotion of sustainable nature-based tourism Visitor centres, trails and infrastructure, workshops, networking, common guidelines Dissemination of information and marketing Networks EUROPARC s Transboundary programme and TransParcNet Green Belt of Fennoscandia External funding from EU s neighbourhood programmes! Photos: Steinar Wikan, Alex Kopatz, Bioforsk, Gunnar Reinholdtsen

Best practice for coordination á la Pasvik- Inari Advisory board formed by management authorities of the npas, municipalities and regional authorities Working group has one representative from each country

PROTECTION OF BOREAL PINE FORESTS

Photo: Juha Paso, Metsähallitus

Photo: Olli Manninen

Hair-snares for plucking bear hair TREES BARBED WIRE BEAR LURE Drawing by Leif Ollila Input from: Alexander Kopatz, NIBIO Svanhovd, Norway All footage from 2015 has been compiled and can be viewed here: http://vimeo.com/144482693

Monitoring of the Pasvik-Inari-Pechenga brown bear population using hair-trapping 2007 2011 2015 196 samples collected 26 of 56 grids showed activity 24 bears identified (10 females, 14 males) 11 new identified, 13 known 88 samples collected 27 of 56 grids showed activity 20 bears identified (12 females, 8 males) 4 new identified, 16 known one bear both in Norway and Russia 209 samples collected 25 of 56 grids showed activity 26 bears identified (17 females, 9 males) 13 new identified, 13 known

BENEFITS FROM TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATION

TB provides Joint understanding of the current status of the environment, which is crucial for managing shared natural resources Involvement of several management and research institutions -> synergies Experience in adopting mutually acceptable solutions while having differences in operational environment, culture and language Possibility to improve professional knowledge and skills as a result from exchange of information with partners Possibility to reflect and use the partners best practices while managing nature protection areas Source to build up a positive image of the nature protection areas in order to attract new visitors and to promote local economy Strong partnerships, to be used in projects too Revealing and useful process forces to analyse in detail what kind of cooperation we are having Help in planning and structuring the cooperation to keep the good work and to improve parts seen needing improvement Quality standards Recommendations from verifier(s) to the cooperation every 5 years High-standard annual meeting of TB experts in TransParcNet Visibility!

Kiitos! Takk! Спасибо! Giitu! Thank you! www.pasvik-inari.net Photos: Steinar Wikan, Johannes Abildsnes, Hans Tømmervik, Riina Tervo, Unknown