LNG the future fuel in ferry and cruise ship ports?! Andrej Vatterrott Hafen- Entwicklungsgesellschaft Rostock mbh
2 1. The Port of Rostock in a nutshell 2. LNG as fuel
3 Port of Rostock: High-capacity hinterland connections
4 Port of Rostock: Aerial view
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 calls, pax [1000] 5 Port of Rostock: Development of cargo handling (million of tons) 30 25 20 15 58% Cruise Traffic 10 5 13% 300 250 200 0 150 General Cargo Bulk Cargo Liquid Cargo Ferry / RoRo Cargo Traffic 100 calls 50 Pax [1000] year 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
6 Port of Rostock: Fact sheet Universal port with multimodal hub for the Baltic Sea with the main focus on ferry and RoRo-traffic only deep-sea port at the German Baltic Sea coast (up to 13,50 draught) a total length of 11km of quays with 45 berths (thereof 6 for ferries and 3 for RoRo vessels) with an area of 7,5 million square meters one of the largest ports at the German Baltic Sea coast reserve areas for the settlement of port-related industries more than 150 companies settled with approximately 6.000 employees in the port and the surrounding area
7 1. The Port of Rostock in a nutshell 2. LNG as fuel
LNG (t) 9 Development scenario: LNG demand in Rostock 160000 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 Development of demand highly uncertain Ferry lines as a basis Cruise ships use LNG only for operation while at berth 40000 low scenario [t LNG] 20000 med. scenario [t LNG] high scenario [t LNG] year 0 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 No use of LNG in extra-(s)eca-traffic
10 Port characteristics concerning LNG EU + national import terminals Regional import terminals Ship bunkering station Intra (S)ECA-traffic dominating Regular traffic dominating Handling of liquids, cold chemicals established Regional shoreside LNG-demand Extra (S)ECA-traffic dominating Irregular traffic dominating Only break-bulk and dry bulk handling LNG-demand only from shipping Likeliness to develop a LNG-supply function for shipping
11 Port characteristics concerning LNG EU + national import terminals Regional import terminals Ship bunkering station Intra (S)ECA-traffic dominating Regular traffic dominating Handling of liquids, cold chemicals established Regional shoreside LNG-demand Extra (S)ECA-traffic dominating Irregular traffic dominating Only break-bulk and dry bulk handling LNG-demand only from shipping Likeliness to develop a LNG-supply function for shipping
12 What we are not talking about LNG import terminals
13 Port of Rostock: Site map and possible LNG development area LNG? Oil port with all necessary facilities to handle liquid and gaseous products Tank storage farm with approx. 1,5 million tons capacity Tank technology? Import berth? Export berth? Necessary permits? Bunkering technology?
14 Possible Bunkering concepts in the Port of Rostock Via pipeline No option due to Boil- Off Gas Tank trucks Feasible from the beginning Use of a tank-trailer as tank onboard not yet regulated Bunker vessel Special permits needed Long berthing time
15 conclusions LNG demand is needed for project development combine shipping with shoreside demand a flexible technical solution is needed Knowledge and Experience with LNG-handling is needed in the port, with the authorities, with the shipping and bunkering companies www.dma.dk www.bsh.de
16 Thank you for your attention!