BALTIC CONTAINER. YEARBOOK 2012 new records and broken limits

Similar documents
Baltic Port Market. BPO Conference Riga, RECIENT FACTS & FIGURES. dr Maciej Matczak

PORT OF HELSINKI ALL OF FINLAND WITHIN YOUR REACH

Unitised Goods Transport via Danish Ports 2004

New opportunities for cargo logistics in Baltic region

Unitised goods via Danish ports in 2004 and the North Sea Region

The MAGALOG Project LNG-fueled shipping in the Baltic Sea

Economical Impact on. Container Transport Market. Erik Ringmaa, Chief Commercial Officer Port of Tallinn

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Gross Domestic Product (GDP), production development,

Oocl.com/belgium/ My OOCL Center oocl.com/netherlands/ OOCL TIDINGS GENERAL

Port of Tallinn Estonia s Biggest Maritime Gateway

Femern Belt Fixed Link

Survey. The worldwide reference in liner shipping. Short version - For the full version, please contact us at

Role of Aviation Sector in Latvia Development of Riga International Airport

DEVELOPMENT OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES IN BALTIC SEA

Visit Finland Visitor Survey 2017

Tourism in Tallinn 2008

The explanations of other terms used throughout the tables are contained in the section on Definitions immediately following the tables.

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY. July December 2017

BRISK Sub-regional risk of spill of oil and hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea

Foreign Overnights in Finland 2016

The challenges of the Mediterranean: economic scenario and forecasts. Alessandro PANARO Head of Mediterranean & Maritime Dept. SRM

Polish Ports in 2017 February 2018

Trieste. 11 port in Europe. for total tonnage for rail traffic. port in Italy. port in Italy. oil port in the. for total tonnage.

% change vs. Dec ALL VISITS (000) 2,410 12% 7,550 5% 31,148 1% Spend ( million) 1,490 15% 4,370-1% 18,710 4%

Responses in Northern Europe to the New Silk Road

SHIPPING STATISTICS AND MARKET REVIEW 2016

P R E S S R E L E A S E

HELCOM Ministerial Declaration on the implementation of the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan

Accommodation statistics 2016

Innovating. Shipment Success Through Intelligent Visibility. Issue 31 May 2015

THE M/S MEGASTAR BUNKERING EXPERIENCE. Tallinn

Investment possibilities of municipal formation KINGISEPP MUNICIPAL DISTRICT. This project is funded by the European Union

European city tourism Study Analysis and findings

in focus Statistics How Eur opeans go on Contents Main features INDUSTRY, TRADE AND SERVICES POPULATION AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS

Tour of Finland s Maritime Community

Overview of tourism trends in Tallinn. First quarter report in 2018

Survey on Employment in European Shipbuilding Countries. - Selected Results -

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

FINAVIA INTERIM REPORT 1 JANUARY SEPTEMBER 2010: DEMAND FOR AIR SERVICES RECOVERING

HUTCHISON PORTS STOCKHOLM

AAPA Shifting Trade Patterns Ocean Carrier Issues and Perspectives

KLAIPEDA GATEWAY TO THE EUROPEAN MARKET

Maritime ports freight and passenger statistics

Bunker Charge (BUC) and Currency Adjustment Factor (CAF) application from/to North Europe

The new Suez Canal. Alessandro PANARO SRM, Head of Maritime and Mediterranean Economy Dept. Naples, October 15 th 2015

assists in the development of airport capacity to meet growing demand supports the development of improved ground access to airports

Baltic Sea Sewage Port Reception Facilities

Report on shipping accidents in the Baltic Sea area during 2010

The Weekly Containershipping-Newsletter by Jan Svendsen and Jan Tiedemann. June 2006, 26 th week

Bunker Charge (BUC) and Currency Adjustment Factor (CAF) application from/to North Europe

MEASURING ACCESSIBILITY TO PASSENGER FLIGHTS IN EUROPE: TOWARDS HARMONISED INDICATORS AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL. Regional Focus.

Measuring economic effects of cruise tourism - Port of Tallinn perspective

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

airbaltic Ambient Media 2015 More ways of reaching the most desirable audience!

Innovating. Shipment Success Through Intelligent Visibility. Issue 63 January 2018

Bunker Charge (BUC) and Currency Adjustment Factor (CAF) application from/to North Europe

The economic impact of ATC strikes in Europe Key findings from our updated report for A4E

October 2013 compared with September 2013 Industrial production down by 1.1% in euro area Down by 0.7% in EU28

MGTA Ocean Freight. January 21, 2016

ASIA NORTH EUROPE NETWORK. April 2018

Service Map : Intra Europe. Copyright 2018 Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Discover a proven way! PORT of KLAIPEDA. Klaipeda Port Extensive Business Opportunities Artūras Drungilas. Marketing and Corporate Affairs Director

Innovating. Shipment Success Through Intelligent Visibility. Issue 55 May 2017

Report on shipping accidents in the Baltic Sea area during Introduction

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY* July December 2015

Innovating. Shipment Success Through Intelligent Visibility. Issue 39 January 2016

Baltic Sea MIRG Project

NORD STREAM 2 STUDY ON COMMERCIAL SHIPS PASSING THE LAY BARGE IN THE FINNISH EEZ

Problem 07 Hub and Spoke

Baltic 21 Lighthouse Project AGORA 2.0. Heritage Tourism for Increased BSR Identity

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY. January June 2018

Half-yearly Report 2013

EU Report. Europe JANUARY 2019

Innovation based development of Klaipeda Port technologies

Innovating. Shipment Success Through Intelligent Visibility. Issue 45 July 2016

Aviation Trends Quarter

total - foreign overnights - domestic overnights

An overview of Tallinn tourism trends

TARIFF OF HARBOUR DUES

HELSINKI TOURISM IN 2008

English Australia. National ELICOS Market Report 2017: Executive Summary

Prof. Dr. Alexis Papathanassis

Statistics of Air, Water, and Land Transport Statistics of Air, Water, and Land. Transport Released Date: August 2015

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

III. TRADE IN COMMERCIAL SERVICES BY CATEGORY

Best practices for attracting cruise tourists

March Future Capacity Requirements in Greater Copenhagen

Finnair Q Result

VINTERSJÖFARTSFORSKNING

Innovating. Shipment Success Through Intelligent Visibility. Issue 54 April 2017

Estonia. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Tourist Traffic in the City of Rijeka For the Period Between 2004 and 2014

EUROPEANS EXPERIENCE WITH USING SHIPS AND PERCEPTIONS OF MARITIME SAFETY

Brussels, December 6 th 2016 Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor Meeting MARITIME CONNECTIONS OF THE SCANDINAVIAN-MEDITERRANEAN CORRIDOR

Selected first results of the 48th Reiseanalyse for ITB 2018

EXPERIENCE THE BUNKERING OF M/S MEGASTAR. Bergen

The Baltic Hotel Market An overview of the capital cities. christie.com

Bigger. Broader. Better. A preview of APL services with OCEAN ALLIANCE

Innovating. Shipment Success Through Intelligent Visibility

Transcription:

BALTIC CONTAINER YEARBOOK 2012 new records and broken limits

See also map of ro-pax services on the inside back cover Cover photo: TT-Line

Baltic Container Yearbook 2012 is a free supplement to Baltic Transport Journal 5/2012 edition and is obtainable in BTJ printed version s annual subscription In order to get your own copy, please go to www.baltictransportjournal.com and click SUBSCRIPTION or contact us at: subscription@baltictransportjournal.com Executive Editor Piotr Trusiewicz piotr.trusiewicz@baltictransportjournal.com Maritime Traffic Editor, Content Consultant Marek Błuś marek.blus@baltictransportjournal.com Rail Traffic Editor, Content Consultant Ernest Czermański ernest.czermanski@baltictransportjournal.com Copy Editors, Data Research Marcin Wełnicki, Michał Pluta Przemysław Opłocki, Anna Paszek English Language Editor Alison Nissen Marketing & Sales: Anna Paszek anna.paszek@baltictransportjournal.com Przemysław Opłocki przemyslaw.oplocki@baltictransportjournal.com Art Director/DTP Danuta Sawicka Publisher Baltic Press sp. z o.o. Address: 8 Pułaskiego Street 81-368 Gdynia, Poland office@baltictransportjournal.com tel. +48 58 627 23 94/95 www.baltictransportjournal.com www.baltictransportmaps.com Circulation: 2,500 Cover Photo: Buss Capital Photo: CMP Note from the editors: This yearbook is based on our own data research and analysis performed July-October 2012 and includes our personal findings, interpretations and assumptions. No other market studies have been used (except where mentioned). Market data has been collected from national statistics, sector organizations and societies, as well as received directly at companies/institutions. The networks and the figures have majorly been confirmed when only possible. However, there is always a field for incorrectness and imprecision. We will appreciate your feedback, suggestions and all arguments that might help us make this publication better in the future. 4 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Dear Readers, This is the first separately published book on the container market issued by the Baltic Transport Journal, and the first such detailed overview of container shipping/rail services in the whole region done ever, at least as far as we know it. Market analysis has been backed up with statistics, tables and maps, including a supplementary map poster giving you a better view of this very complex market. The presented networks are valid for early October 2012. As market conditions are changing rapidly today, not all the facts can still be true by the time you are reading this, but the general picture in this sector does not change so quickly. Yet, please treat this publication as the general overview of the market. If you need information on currently available connections, please check our regularly updated maps portal at www.baltictransportmaps.com. The portal gives also an insight into even more details of the network (each service shown separately, all connections from each port and terminal). As a number of things in this study appear subjective, we are very much open to any comments and feedback on the correctness and usability, also in terms of the suggested new measures for better comparison of the market players. If you wish to share your view with us, please do not hesitate to contact us: editorial@baltictransportjournal.com, tel. +48 58 627 23 94. Last but not least, we would like to thank all of the ports, terminals, shipping and rail operators community for their help in making this project come to life, as well as all our sponsors and supporters. Without you, this would have never happened. Enjoy your reading, Piotr Trusiewicz, Executive Editor 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 5

Project guidelines 7 Project guidelines 11 Maritime traffic 29 Rail traffic 37 Shipping networks 59 Rail networks 77 Annexes 6 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Project guidelines Project guidelines Each market is an infinitely complex, dynamic structure of interconnected, ever changing clusters, so its boundaries are hard to define. When putting out a publication like this one, it is impossible to showcase such a broad subject without necessary En simplifications. Therefore, in the interest of clarity and transparency we laid out a set of strict guidelines. Here is a list of basic rules we adhered to when selecting the contents for this study, complete with justifications: 1. Defining the Baltic Sea region (BSR) As the question of the actual borders of the Baltic Sea region in transport network remains open, for the purpose of this publication, we include nine countries featuring their coastlines along the Baltic Sea. These are (in alphabetical order): Estonia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Sweden. Analyzing container supply chains we decided to include all ports in Denmark and Sweden (up to their most western locations) into the Baltic region as cargo from these ports goes mainly to/from their respective domestic markets, meaning they serve the BSR regardless of their location. This rule does not pertain to Germany, as hinterland of the North Sea ports consists practically of all Europe (and their traffic is only in part directed to our region). Hence, our statistics include only German ports from the east side of the Jutland Peninsula. We also allow only three Russian container ports (namely St. Petersburg, Kaliningrad and Ust-Luga) with their hinterland consisting not only of their own (Baltic) regions, but of all the North-West part of Russia all the way to Moscow (roughly 750 km from the Russian Baltic coast). Photo: Hapag-Lloyd 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 7

Project guidelines 2. All traffic to/from and within the region The project lists all connections that interlink sea ports within the region as well as directly link the Baltic Sea with other areas, both in container shipping and intermodal rail traffic. Shipping network Each shipping service has been shown in its full loop, starting at least at one of the Baltic ports and going up to the last port of call where you need to tranship cargo to another vessel in order to take it further. This means that the North Sea hubs, ports in Norway, as well as more distant locations outside of the BSR (the rest of Europe and beyond) are included in the network only in case they are on the way of the service calling at one of the Baltic ports. There are three types of shipping services that has been shown in the maps/networks: Intra-Baltic loops (like e.g. Seago Line s Gdańsk-St. Petersburg service), Feeder/shortsea loops that go outside the Baltic Sea to other European destinations, like for example Team Line s NOR 2 service (calls only Gothenburg in the Baltic), Direct ocean services, like Maersk Line s AE10, presented from Gdańsk, Gothenburg and Aarhus in its full rotation up to Shanghai. Photo: Hapag-Lloyd Rail network In order to show a possibly full picture of rail intermodal services with their complementary and competitive role to shipping lines we have marked three types of container trains in the network: all services run directly from the Baltic Sea ports to their final destination, or if rail operator provides a wider network to its first hub terminal within the BSR (and its borders as stated above), e.g. Hupac s shuttle Lübeck-Duisburg (with DIT acting as a hub for Hupac s further connections), connection trains from inland hubs up to the first transhipment point beyond the BSR, provided by the same rail operator who links this hub with the Baltic ports, e.g. Hupac s Duisburg-Vienna service (Hupac provides a regular link from Lübeck to Duisburg, and then a direct train to Vienna), direct trains or shuttle network rail system between the Baltic region (inland locations) and ports outside of the region, like North Sea or Adriatic, e.g. PCC Intermodal s Rotterdam-Gliwice service (via Brzeg Dolny, Frankfurt/Oder and Duisburg). 3. Only regular traffic In order to paint a reliable picture of the competition in the region we only include regular services. This means daily, weekly and any x-days frequency with officially published timetables. The same goes for both shipping lines and intermodal connections. We are not taking into account services that serve a momentary market demand, as otherwise we would need to draw lines from anywhere to anywhere. 4. Only open-access services As our goal is to help the international logistics sector streamline its freight flows, our statistics cover only open access services. This basically means you will not find here services dedicated to just one client (like a factory or a wholesaler/retailer) no matter if we talk about shipping or rail. 5. No slot agreements The locations marked on all maps and featured in all charts are destinations in real service of the given operator, and thus they may sometimes differ from commercial offers (which involve subcontractors). We believe that including slot-based connections would create an image of exaggerated competition and artificially multiply lines to each and every location. For shipping this means that we exclusively feature operators who effectively sail their vessels to the presented ports, and not e.g. ocean carriers offering destinations in the BSR with the use of public feeders. (Hence, you will find Unifeeder and Team Lines in the networks, and not their ocean clients in the network). For rail we show only services which are run and sold by the given operator (it is not the traction itself that matters, but a commercial offer). Any controversial cases have been agreed with the involved parties, e.g. we feature Maersk Polska as the operator, even though the traction is provided by other companies. Meanwhile, we name 8 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Project guidelines only ECL as the operator of Veronashuttle (from Lübeck) even though the tractionist is TX Logistik and DHL uses this service for its inner purposes. Naturally, operators collaborate in numerous ways with each other, but no slots booked on other operators' trains have been marked in this publication. 6. Only active services This publication is a picture of the market taken in September 2012. Therefore we have marked only those services that are active at the time of this publication and whose routings can be verified at this very moment. Any planned services that are not currently in operation have not been included. You can find the current networks on www.baltictransportmaps.com portal which is regularly updated. Once the service is initiated (or altered), we add new line to the network and then include this one into the next yearbook publication updated annually. Photo: Port of Helsingborg 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 9

7 Project guidelines 11 Maritime traffic 11 Baltic container ports 16 Container terminals 19 Shipping lines Tables 13 Tab. 1. Container turnover in the BSR ports by countries (2011) 14 Tab. 2. Baltic container ports in the liner lo-lo feeder/shortsea network (2011) 16 Tab. 3. Baltic ports handling containers outside the liner lo-lo network (2011) 17 Tab. 4. Top 15 Baltic ports annual turnover by terminals (2011) 18 Tab. 5. Baltic feeder/shortsea operators total capacity (2012) 20 Tab. 6. Top 12 Baltic feedering vessels (2012) 22 Tab. 7. Distribution of feeder/shortsea vessels in capacity groups (2012) 24 Tab. 8. Baltic networks of feeder/shortsea operators in figures (2012) 29 Rail traffic 37 Shipping networks 59 Rail networks 77 Annexes

Maritime traffic Maritime traffic Baltic container ports Photo: DCT Gdańsk In 2011 the total yearly container turnover in Baltic ports amounted to 8.8 mln TEU, for the first time exceeding 2008 s 'pre-crisis' record of 8 mln TEU. Clearly, most of the current surplus (83% of the whole 1.35 mln TEU growth yoy) was achieved by a group of Io eight large ports on the eastern shores of the Baltic (from HaminaKotka in the north to Gdynia and Gdańsk in the south) which, apart from serving their own hinterlands, are mostly engaged in transits to Russia or to other continental markets. Last year seven out of the already mentioned eight ports namely St. Petersburg, Tallinn, Riga, Klaipėda, Kaliningrad, Gdańsk and Gdynia also beat their own historic peaks recorded in years 2007-2008. The only exception here is HaminaKotka, which even after the merger of two separate port entities is now only the fifth container port in the Baltic. Five years earlier Kotka s sole outcome gave it a third place finish in the whole region (with a total of 670,000 TEU); if we add Hamina s traffic at that time, it would amount to a joint throughput of 850 thou. TEU in 2007. Nevertheless, after a dramatic decline in Russian transit, the current hundred thousand boxes extra for both Finnish ports should be considered nothing less than a healthy recovery. Conversely, ports on the western shores noted a rather moderate growth in 2011, or even a mini drop (up to -3%). This definitely proves a growing concentration of container traffic. Last year s Top 10 Baltic Ports, which actually includes seven of the abovementioned names (all except for Tallinn holding the 12th position), handled almost 80% (7.01 mln TEU) of the whole region s turnover. This amounted to about 76% (5.63 mln TEU) in 2010. One must also keep in mind that the regular container network is now richer by several 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 11

Maritime traffic new ports, including the Russian Ust-Luga, Swedish Raahe and Danish Kalundborg. The brand new container terminal in Ust-Luga has been receiving semi-regular calls by UCS Line since mid 2011, a full scheduled line by Unifeeder (since December 2011) and the most recent loop by CMA CGM (from October 2012). Meanwhile, in H1 2012, TransAtlantic has added Raahe to its Trans Feeder Line North and Unifeeder expanded its Danish Service by including Kalundborg. The total outcome of the eastern Baltic ports with their hinterland of Russia and CIS, Poland and CEE, surpassed 5 mln TEU last year. Half of this was done by the Russians directly. The neighbouring Gdańsk and Gdynia together featured a 1.3 mln throughput, the Baltic States added almost 900 thousand and the Finnish transit brought another 200 thou TEU. This almost equals 60% of the total Baltic market. The total foreign traffic of Finland itself was on the level of 1.2 mln TEU. Ports on the Swedish western coast handled 1.1 mln TEU and the eastern coast the longest Baltic shore with the largest number of container ports (14 as of 2011) added another 360 thou. TEU. The western Baltic region (incl. Denmark, Germany and Polish Szczecin-Świnoujście) moved another million. Comparing those figures to 2006 s results shows that the 'point of gravity' in container traffic is constantly moving eastward in 2006 continental ports handled 48% of the BSR throughput. Back at the beginning of the century, this ratio was only 25%. In terms of individual port handlings there is still virtually no rival for St. Petersburg, which again broke its records and ended up with a 2,365 thou. TEU result for 2011 (22% yoy increase). This also means that its lead over second-placed Gothenburg is constantly growing. Back in 2007 the throughput of Russia s main gateway was already twice as big as that of Sweden s primary entry port, but last year the difference grew up to 2.6 times. Even though the improving performance of transit ports in its vicinity (and the start-up of Ust- Luga Container ), St. Petersburg is still in a class of its own, being not just the only Baltic 'millionaire', but also the only single player from our region noticeable in the global charts (a 54 th position among the world s biggest container ports in 2011). Meanwhile, St. Pete's dominance in our region can be illustrated by the fact that its annual figures are bigger than the totals of its three closest rivals together, namely Gothenburg, Gdańsk and Gdynia (no. 2-4 in the ranking). Apparently, 2011 was also a particularly good container year for Finnish Rauma as well as for some smaller ports, like Aalborg (+45 thou. TEU), Gävle (+18 12 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Maritime traffic thou. TEU), Södertälje (+15 thou. TEU), Sundsvall (+11 thou. TEU), Norrköping (+7.6 thou. TEU), Fredericia (+7.2 thou. TEU) and Kokkola (+5.9 thou. TEU). Tab. 1. Container turnover in the BSR ports by countries (2011) Country Containers [mln TEU] Yoy (%) 5-year (%) Russia 1 2.685 +24 +68 23.2 Sweden 1.522 +8 +18 14.0 Finland 1.399 +12 0 12.0 Poland 1.349 +28 +132 9.4 Denmark 2 0.782 +7 +14 5.3 Lithuania 0.382 +29 +65 3.5 Latvia 0.306 +19 +73 3.2 Estonia 0.198 +30 +29 1.3 Germany 3 0.174-3 -29 2.1 Total: 8.797 +18 +37 74.0 Remarks: 1 Only Baltic Russian ports 2 All Denmark (incl. Esbjerg on the western coast) 3 Only Baltic ports (Eastern Germany) Cargo in containers [mln tonnes] Photo: Unifeeder The dynamic boost in major ports of the eastern Baltic countries has led to their best results ever with double-digit growths noted in 2011. Hence Russia, all three Baltic States and Poland have beaten their records so far in overall ports box results set in 2008. In addition last year brought an extra 112 thou. TEU in Sweden which again translates to the country s best result ever, but this surplus occurred not in Sweden s giant Gothenburg (+26.6 thou TEU yoy), but primarily in its 11 medium and small harbours. Today, three countries are still below their peak throughputs. Finland's ports accounted for 1.6 mln boxes in 2008 (14% more than in 2011) and Denmark featured 790,000 TEU in 2007 (1% more than now). The only downturn was noted in German Baltic ports, Port of Aarhus unique opportunities Container traffic A large number of shipping lines connect the port of Aarhus with ports in the Nordic countries, Northern, Southern and Eastern Europe and ports in the UK, the Eastern Mediterranean and Asia and therefore an important hub for transshipment. Ro/Ro traffic Ro/Ro facilities in the port of Aarhus are available at the Container, the Multi and Pier 3. There is regular Ro/Ro traffic to Finland, Russia, Lituania and Zealand (DK). Close to the quays are spacious areas for trailers waiting for shipment. Passenger ferries From the Ferry on Pier 3 there is a regular ferry service between Aarhus and Zealand several times a day with catamaran ferries transporting passengers, cars and busses. Transit time is approx. 70 min. Mindet 2, DK-8100 Aarhus C Tel. +45 86 13 32 66, port@aarhus.dk www.aarhushavn.dk 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 13

Maritime traffic but their specifics do not allow clear comparisons, as neither Lübeck, Kiel, Rostock nor Sassnitz features regular lo-lo lines. Their boxes arrive almost entirely on con-ro, ro-ro and ro-pax ships and are therefore much more affected by direct competition from intra- European trailer traffic than any other container trends (either local or global). The main outcome is done by regular feeder/shortsea lo-lo services in a network of thirtyodd ports. Last year this group consisted of 36 ports which are listed in Table 2. Altogether they handled 97% of the total Baltic 8.8 mln TEU, although again, to be precise not every single box in these ports travelled onboard a container ship. For example, about 15% of throughput in Helsinki goes on con-ro/ro-ro vessels on route to Lübeck/Travemünde. Also, not every container was delivered by scheduled services. The table includes Ust-Luga which only joined the regular network at the end of December, so its 2011 totals were transported by one semiregular general cargo link from the North Sea hubs and occasionally from other ports. Tab. 2. Baltic container ports in the liner lo-lo feeder/shortsea network (2011) 1 No. Country Port Turnover [TEU] Yoy (%) No. of services Feeder and shortsea operators 1 RU St. Petersburg 2,365,174 +22 28 CMA CGM, Containerships, Delta Shipping Lines, FESCO, Maersk/Seago, MSC, OOCL, SCA Transforest, Sea Connect, Swan Container Line, Team Lines, Unifeeder 2 SE Gothenburg 913,886 +3 16 CMA CGM, Containerships, Delta Shipping Lines, Green Feeder, K-Line, Mac Andrews, Maersk/Seago, MSC, OOCL, Team Lines, Unifeeder, X-Press Feeders 3 PL Gdańsk 685,643 +33 6 CMA CGM, Maersk/Seago, Unifeeder 4 PL Gdynia 616,441 +27 13 CMA CGM, Delta Shipping Lines, Mac Andrews, Mann Lines, MSC, OOCL, Team Lines Unifeeder 5 FI HaminaKotka 612,174 +19 11 CMA CGM, Maersk/Seago, MSC, OOCL, Team Lines, Tschudi Lines, Unifeeder 6 DK Aarhus 431,000-3 16 CMA CGM, Containerships, Delta Shipping Lines, Eimskip, Green Feeder, K-Line, Maersk/Seago, MSC, Samskip, Team Lines, Unifeeder 7 FI Helsinki 393,773-2 15 CMA CGM, Containerships, Hacklin Seatrans, Maersk/Seago, MSC, Team Lines, Tschudi Lines, Unifeeder 8 LT Klaipėda 382,185 +30 11 CMA CGM, Containerships, Maersk/Seago, MSC, OOCL, Sea Connect, Tschudi Lines, Unifeeder 9 RU Kaliningrad 317,764 +38 6 CMA CGM, Maersk/Seago, Mann Lines, MSC, Unifeeder 10 LV Riga 302,973 +19 9 CMA CGM, Containerships, Maersk/Seago, Mann Lines, MSC, Unifeeder 11 FI Rauma 218,280 +35 7 CMA CGM, Maersk/Seago, MSC, OOCL, Team Lines, Unifeeder 12 EE Tallinn 197,717 +30 6 CMA CGM, MSC, Sea Connect, Team Lines, Tschudi Lines, Unifeeder 13 SE Helsingborg 174,525 +17 9 CMA CGM, Eimskip, Green Feeder, Maersk/Seago, MSC, Team Lines, Unifeeder 14 DK/SE CMP (Copenhagen-Malmö) 2 171,300 +6 10 CMA CGM, Green Feeder, Maersk/Seago, MSC, Team Lines, Unifeeder 15 SE Gävle 118,883 +18 5 CMA CGM, MSC, OOCL, Team Lines, Unifeeder 16 DK Aalborg 108,652 +70 1 X-Press Feeders 17 DK ADP (Fredericia) 63,000 +13 4 CMA CGM, Green Feeder, MSC, Unifeeder 18 PL Szczecin-Świnoujście 54,985-3 5 CMA CGM, Team Lines, TransAtlantic, Unifeeder 19 SE Södertälje 52,815 +39 4 Containerships, MSC, TransAtlantic 20 SE Norrköping 44,570 +21 3 MSC, Team Lines, TransAtlantic 21 DK Esbjerg 38,000 +6 2 Tschudi Lines 22 FI Oulu 32,290 +4 2 Merilinja, TransAtlantic 23 SE Stockholm 28,432 +29 2 Team Lines, Unifeeder 24 SE Halmstad 25,261-8 2 CMA CGM, Unifeeder 25 SE Mälarhamnar 24,697 +15 2 TransAtlantic 26 SE Åhus 22,131-6 2 Team Lines, TransAtlantic 27 FI Pori 20,895-7 1 Hacklin Seatrans 28 SE Umeå 19,687 +12 1 SCA Transforest 29 SE Sundsvall 19,231 +125 1 SCA Transforest 30 SE Oxelösund 18,360 +66 1 TransAtlantic 31 FI Kokkola 18,034 +48 1 Merilinja 32 FI Tornio 17,734 +24 1 TransAtlantic 33 FI Turku 12,094-12 1 Team Lines 34 SE Varberg 9,075 +14 1 Samskip 35 FI Kemi 4,160-9 1 TransAtlantic 36 RU Ust-Luga 2,000 1 Unifeeder Total: 8,537,821 Remarks: 1 Excl. direct oceanic services 2 Copenhagen 140 thou. TEU, Malmö 30.3 thou. TEU 14 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Maritime traffic Photos: Global Ports Boxes travelling on ro-ro, ro-pax, con-ro or multipurpose vessels are naturally a niche market (yet an eye-catching one) of around 300,000 TEU in the Baltic ports each year. In 2011 container operations were noted in 16 ports staying completely outside the liner lo-lo network, with handlings ranging from almost 120,000 TEU in German Lübeck down to Finnish Vaasa with just a single box in its official statistics. Even though the role of these players in the whole market picture seems marginal (2.7% of the total 8.8 mln TEU), the ro-ro/ferry ports in the top three positions recorded volumes which would make many container terminals envious. If we leave the handling technology aside, Lübeck would occupy a 16 th position in the joint ranking of all ports reporting container traffic, Hanko would be 18 th and Kiel 26 th. Other ports in Table 3 showed rather low turnovers, but Iggesund, Wallhamn and Raahe still received more TEU than the smallest Baltic lo-lo liner the Port of Kemi. Small numbers of containers are transported by general cargo vessels or bulkers in regular traffic or in tramping. For example, UPM Seaways along with its ro-ro ships operates conventional regular services for breakbulk to Rostock and UK ports carrying containers from Kotka, Rauma and Pietarsaari onboard its multipurpose units. Transmarine Line provides a similar service (partly taking containers) between Kiel and Kaliningrad. Advertisement Your Gateway to the Baltic and beyond Container and general cargo terminal Specialized Multipurpose transhipment point Part of the international DB Schenker Rail network Important logistics hub of the Baltic region in the direction of Berlin, Central Europe and the Adriatic land bridge The only port in Poland with a sea connection to the entire European barge network The only port in Poland with NATO Certificate The closest sea port to the cities of Berlin, Dresden, Leipzig, Vienna and Prague Excellent access to road and rail network, inland waterways in Poland as well as neighboring countries New container terminal of international standard with a high volume capacity Modern technical equipment and IT solutions for containers and general cargo loading/unloading Highly qualified personnel Contact data: DB Port Szczecin Sp. z o.o. Bytomska 14, 70-603 Szczecin, Poland 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 15 tel. +48 091 430 86 60, fax. +48 091 46 24 779 e-mail: sekretariat@dbport.pl

Maritime traffic Tab. 3. Baltic ports handling containers outside the liner lo-lo network (2011) 1 No. Country Port Turnover [TEU] Yoy (%) Services type 1 DE Lübeck 117,000-7 con-ro, ro-ro, ro-pax 2 FI Hanko 64,285 +28 con-ro and ro-ro 3 DE Kiel 28,021 +8 ro-ro, ro-pax, lo-lo 4 SE Iggesund 2 10,109 +28 industrial con-ro 5 SE Wallhamn 8,950-12 con-ro, ro-ro 6 FI Raahe 4,175-19 irregular (feeder since 2012) 7 LV Liepāja 2,964 +65 ro-pax 8 FI Pietarsaari 634-38 general cargo 9 SE Piteå 478-42 irregular 10 SE Karlskrona 328-21 ro-pax 11 DE Rostock 311-82 ro-ro, general cargo 12 DE Sassnitz 197 +101 ro-ro 13 SE Uddevalla 122-10 irregular 14 FI Eckerö 11 ro-pax 15 SE Hargshamn 7-98 irregular 16 FI Vaasa 1-50 ro-pax Total: 237,593 Remarks: 1 Excl. direct oceanic services 2 Aka Skärnäs One may notice that the aggregate result of both Tables 2 and 3 is a bit smaller than the grand total for the whole Baltic region which we can find in the national statistics (Table 1). There are many reasons for those slight differences. For starters, the methods for counting containers vary between the ports and their associations as well as between state administrations. Most likely, the real bone of contention are boxes loaded onto roll-trailers and ro-ro ships. Some smaller ports container handlings are also skipped by national or association statistics (like in the case of Denmark). Some harbours do not report containers at all, even though they handle some. Some national figures may also be imprecise, e.g. Finland does not count domestic traffic. Fortunately, all these factors do not change the full market landscape. Container terminals Photos: Port of Aarhus Last year the Baltic market listed 49 container terminals (see Annex 6) in 36 ports involved in regular traffic and the competition among them was even fiercer. When the Top 10 ports made up 80% of the total market, the ten biggest terminals served only 65%, and the sum of the 20 leading players hardly exceeded 7 mln TEU. The Port of St. Petersburg features as many as six competing terminals, half of the port s total handlings goes through FCT (the Baltic market leader by the way) and one fourth through Petrolesport (third position in the ranking). Four terminals fight for the same cargo in Gdańsk and Gdynia, three in Riga, two in Klaipėda and Kaliningrad. All Scandinavian ports feature one terminal each, usually operated by the port authorities themselves. There are several stevedoring companies in Finnish Hamina and Kotka or Helsinki (Vuosaari), but terminals are still governed by the ports. Even though a much more open situation on the continental side of the Baltic, an interesting thing is that the largest terminals in the region are primarily run by local (but not necessarily Baltic) companies, e.g. DCT Gdańsk is owned by an Australian investment fund run by Macquarie Group and BCT Riga is fully owned by Italian Mariner S.p.A., and thus commercially linked to MSC shipping line. Global terminal operators are represented only by APM s (Gothenburg and Aarhus) as well as ICTSI (Gdynia) and Hutchison (Gdynia and Stockholm). 16 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Maritime traffic No. Port Tab. 4. Top 15 Baltic ports annual turnover by terminals (2011) Turnover [thou. TEU] Turnover [thou. TEU] FCT 1,174 CTSP 95 1 St. Petersburg 2,365 PLP 635 Rusmarine 60 Moby Dik 227 NMT 30 2 Gothenburg 914 APMT 914 3 Gdańsk 686 DCT 635 GTK 50 4 Gdynia 1 616 BCT 362 GCT 246 5 HaminaKotka 2 612 Kotka 494 Hamina 119 6 Aarhus 431 APMT-CS 431 7 Helsinki 394 Vuosaari 394 8 Klaipėda 382 KCT 224 Smeltė 158 9 Kaliningrad 318 BCT 162 KSCP 156 10 Riga 2 303 BCT 253 RCT 34 RUT 17 11 Rauma 218 Rauma Stevedoring 218 12 Tallinn 198 Muuga 3 184 13 Helsingborg 175 VCT 175 14 CMP (Copenhagen-Malmö) 171 CCT 141 Northern Harbour 30 15 Gävle 119 GCT 119 Turnover [thou. TEU] 1 Port s total incl. 8 thou. TEU handled by ro-ro Baltic General Cargo Gdynia 2 The slight difference in port and operator totals comes from an inconsistency in public and private statistics 3 Port s total incl. 14 thou. TEU handled in con-ro traffic at Paldiski South Harbour 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 17

Maritime traffic 18 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012 Tab. 5. Baltic feeder/shortsea operators total capacity (2012) 1 No. Operator No. of ships Total capacity TEU Yoy [%] Ship's average TEU Yoy [%] Total GT 1 Unifeeder 32 33,321-16 1,041 +4 355,752 2 MSC 17 32,056 +42 1,886 +29 407,711 3 CMA CGM 14 16,160 +330 1,154 +53 163,429 4 Seago Line 2 11 15,840-19 1,440 +11 163,166 5 Team Lines 11 9,621-45 875-16 92,512 6 OOCL 8 8,818 +61 1,102 +20 94,091 7 Containerships 8 7,005-11 876 0 72,172 8 Hapag-Lloyd 3 3,757 1,252 41,831 9 Eimskip 3 3,637 +4 1,212 +4 35,762 10 Delta Shipping Lines 4 3,472-9 868-9 39,924 11 TransAtlantic 7 3,342-8 477 +4 31,408 12 Sea Connect 4 2,793 +33 698-1 26,743 13 X-Press Feeders 3 2,591-25 864 +23 24,009 14 APL 3 2,377 792 32,591 15 MacAndrews 3 2,114-12 705 +17 19,723 16 Merilinja 3 1,915 +41 638-6 16,382 17 SCA Transforest 2 1,834 +127 917 +13 18,287 18 Samskip 2 1,816 0 908 0 17,660 19 Tschudi Lines 3 1,766 +3 589 +3 14,899 20 K-Line 2 1,387-2 694-2 12,382 21 Mann Lines 2 1,316 +100 658 0 10,123 22 Green Feeder 2 1.016 0 508 0 7,998 23 Swan Container Line 1 1,008-46 1,008 +3 11,662 24 Hacklin Seatrans 1 374-58 347-22 3,828 Total: 149 159,307 +1.5 1,069 +9 1,696,645 Remarks: 1 Excl. direct ocean services 2 Former Maersk Line services

Maritime traffic Shipping lines Photos: OOCL The Baltic Sea container network mainly consists of feeder lines linking the region with European hub ports, primarily Hamburg, Rotterdam, Antwerp and Bremerhaven. This is supplemented by some shortsea cargo-oriented services (like between Poland or Sweden and the UK). The fact is, however, that practically all traditional feeder lines today also offer shortsea services. The market is additionally served by several direct ocean loops to Asia and both Americas. Functions of feeder operators are diverse due to their ownership and fleet size. First, we have two huge independent common carriers Unifeeder and Team Lines serving ocean players that do not go to the Baltic Sea with their own vessels or do not visit all its 'corners'. Both companies feature wide networks reaching practically all ports and all their terminals in the whole region except the northern part of the Gulf of Bothnia. The second group consists of global carriers (like CMA CGM, Maersk Line, MSC or OOCL) with their own dedicated feeder lines that are a natural extension of their own global liner networks. The rest belongs to small/medium local operators usually providing one or two loops and connecting selected sub-regions. The two main public feeders dominated the market for years. In 2006 both companies led the chart jointly, featuring 40% of total shipping capacity (in nominal TEU) available on the market. One third of the shipping capacity belonged to dedicated feeder lines of the ocean carries and another 30% to local operators. Yet, things have slowly been changing and, by the beginning of 2011, the share of global carriers had grown to about 36% at the expense of both local leaders (an equal share of 36%) and other operators (a drop to 28%). Finally, the last months of 2011 and the beginning of 2012 brought an important change and for the first time in the region s container shipping history global carriers feedering business held more than half (50.2%) of the total feeder/shortsea nominal capacity on the market. The pair of local leaders follows with 27% and others with 23% only. To be precise, the advantage of global players will grow to 51.5% if we add the shortsea lines of MacAndrews to its parent company CMA CGM. During the recent years, the club of giants has significantly grown in numbers. We have more ocean companies, more loops and bigger www.portofhelsinki.fi 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 19

Maritime traffic ships. The four aforementioned companies (Maersk Line is now acting through its sister Seago Line) were joined by APL, Hapag-Lloyd and K-Line. The only exception to this rule maybe lies in the number of ports of call. This grew tremendously from thirteen harbours in 2006 up to twenty in 2010, but since then it has remained constant. Tab. 6. Top 12 Baltic feedering vessels (2012) 1 No. Vessel Operator Capacity [TEU] GT 1 Conti Singa MSC 3,469 42,336 2 Conti Sharjah MSC 3,469 42,323 3 MSC Atlantic MSC 3,005 37,071 4 Arelia MSC 2,714 32,161 5 Athen Trader MSC 2,386 29,195 6 MSC Joy MSC 1,936 30,567 7 Helle Ritscher Maersk/Seago 1,856 17,360 8-9 FESCO Vladimir CMA CGM 1,730 16,803 8-9 FESCO Voronezh MSC 1,730 16,803 10-11 Maersk Venice Maersk/Seago 1,719 17,189 10-11 Maersk Vigo Maersk/Seago 1,719 17,189 12 Rijnborg Maersk/Seago 1,712 16,523 Remarks: 1 Excl. direct oceanic services Although the process of concentration seems to speed up and applies to companies of all sizes, there are still 24 operators involved in the Baltic feeder/shortsea business today (four companies more than six years ago). Among the successful new entrants are Green Feeder, Merilinja, Sea Connect and SCA Transforest. This does not mean that all companies from 2006 are still on the market. Combispeed, ESF-Euroservices, FESCO- ESF and Saimaa Lines closed their operations. Several other names have rebranded. Baltic Container Lines merged with IMCL, which was later acquired by Unifeeder. Kuršių Linija 20 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Maritime traffic was bought by Containerships. TECO is now Tschudi Lines and Trans-Baltica was incorporated into the Mann Lines network. On the other hand, the Baltic network has also seen its strongest operators expanding geographically. Team Lines has opened services to the Iberian Peninsula, Unifeeder to the UK, and vessels of Containerships sail in a detached network between Mediterranean ports (after the acquisition of the Turkish operator Contaz Line). Even though operators usually declare themselves as either feeder or shortsea, in fact most of them carry containers both in overseas and intra-european traffic. Among the 17 common carriers only three companies (Green Feeder, Team Lines and X-Press Feeders) do not officially take shortsea containers. Twelve companies operate their own (or leased) fleets of containers thus also offering door-to-door services. Two operators (namely Containerships and Unifeeder) have their box fleets in the range of 15,000 units each. The average capacity of a Baltic container vessel (employed in feeder/shortsea loops) has grown continuously, quite independently of the market conditions. Schedules in September 2012 raised the average ship capacity up to 1,072 TEU, for the first time exceeding a benchmark of one thousand TEU. This is 91 TEU more than 12 months earlier (+9%) and about 400 TEU more than in 2006 (+60%). Yet, in 2011 alone the average vessel capacity increased only by 21 TEU (+2%). Actually, the Baltic medium capacity rises and falls mostly due to changes in the largest ships sailing in the region, which can be misleading for future tonnage demand estimations. If we remove just the six vessels of over 1,936 TEU from the list (all provided by MSC), the average capacity of the remaining 140 ships would again drop below one thousand TEU. The main and most likely stable factor for the growing average is a process which we can call equalisation to a new Baltic feeder handy standard. It means that more and more ships belong to the two most popular groups of handy vessels. The first group between 800 and 1,000 TEU (now 49 units) and the second around 1,400 TEU (22 units). In fact the latter one is uniform with all vessels ranging between 1,402 and 1,465 TEU. Conversely, since 2007 all huge new deliveries entering the Baltic market are in the range of 1,600-1,800 TEU ( baltimax vessels). Today s market shows 11 ships in that range, two less than in 2011. All bigger ships in terms of capacity and gross tonnage were, or still are, ocean liners retired or detached temporarily to serve 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 21

Maritime traffic in the role of feeders. Summing up, the share of both Baltic handy categories and the baltimax feeder in the total market capacity is around 60%. Tab. 7. Distribution of feeder/shortsea vessels in capacity groups (2012) 1 Capacity TEU 1800+ 1600-1800 1400-1600 1200-1400 1000-1200 800-1000 510-800 Less 510 Total Global carriers 7 7 16 5 8 9 5 1 58 Unifeeder/Team Lines 4 4 2 6 18 8 1 43 Local companies 2 2 22 10 12 48 Total: 7 11 22 7 16 49 23 14 149 MSC runs the biggest vessels on Baltic Sea, occupying the six first positions in the Baltic feeder/shortsea network (Table 6). It is also the only company operating vessels over 2,000 TEU, with the largest one in terms of its nominal capacity and gross tonnage being Conti Singa (3,469 TEU/GT 42,336). Actually, this vessel established a new record of TEU capacity for the Baltic feeders, while the gross tonnage max still belongs to MSC Carina (GT 42,640) which entered the Baltic Sea in 2011. Getting back to 2006 again, the biggest Baltic feeder featured a nominal capacity of 1,386 TEU. At the same time, MSC has the biggest ships capacity average and its result last year of 1,886 TEU is the largest number ever performed in the region. The changing figures underline the growing split between global carriers and local companies. The average of all ships among the seven big global players is now around 1,400 TEU. The two feeder leaders come with 998 TEU and other operators follow with just 756 TEU. In 2011 the respective figures were 1,216 TEU, 1,014 TEU and 775 TEU. Meanwhile, seven Baltic feeder/shortsea operators feature ships exceeding 1,200 TEU in their fleets one more than a year before. MSC has 16 such units and only one of its ships falls below this limit. Seago Line and Unifeeder each have eight, CMA CGM seven. Four operators (Eimskip, Hapag-Lloyd, OOCL and Team Lines) have only two units of this size. Obviously, the market still needs smaller vessels. Five feeder companies still run ships below 500 TEU (in fact all of them are multipurpose vessels classed as 'general cargo'). This is one unit less than in 2011 but only half of the number from the beginning of 2010. On the other hand, the number of units just over 500 TEU grew from six to nine. All of them are sister ships of 508 TEU each. PORT OF HAMINAKOTKA 22 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012 www.haminakotka.fi

Maritime traffic Photos: Wikimedia Commons Container traffic grows with 175% from 2007-2011 at the port of Fredericia Take advantage of our unique location in Denmark at the entrance to the Baltic Sea. Reach Europe and the entire world via 6 weekly departures of container feeder vessels. For details visit www.adp-as.com 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 23

Maritime traffic Photos: Wikimedia Commons Tab. 8. Baltic networks of feeder/shortsea operators in figures (2012) 1 No. Operator Services Ports total BSR ports North Sea hubs 2 Other ports 1 Unifeeder 22 31 23 5 3 2 Team Lines 11 24 16 3 5 3 CMA CGM 10 23 18 5 4 MSC 9 22 17 4 1 5 Maersk/Seago 8 13 11 2 6 Containerships 6 12 8 2 2 7 OOCL 3 4 10 6 4 8 TransAtlantic 3 14 10 2 2 9 Tschudi Lines 2 9 4 1 4 10 Eimskip 2 9 2 2 5 11 Hapag-Lloyd 2 7 5 2 12 Green Feeder 2 6 5 1 13 Mann Lines 2 6 3 3 14 Sea Connect 2 5 3 2 15 Delta Shipping Lines 2 5 2 2 1 16 MacAndrews 2 5 2 3 17 APL 2 4 2 2 18 K-Line 1 8 2 1 5 19 Samskip 1 8 2 1 5 20 SCA Transforest 1 5 4 1 21 Merilinja 1 5 3 2 22 X-Press Feeders 1 3 2 1 23 Hacklin Seatrans 1 2 1 1 24 Swan Container Line 1 2 1 1 Total: 98 Remarks: 1 Excl. direct oceanic services 2 Incl.Wilhelmshaven (JadeWeser) 3 Two services (SBX 1 and SBX 2), each consists of two loops All in all, feeder and shortsea Baltic operators currently serve 98 independent lines to/from/within the Baltic ports. 84 services link us to the North Sea hubs (sometimes other ports are included in these loops). Today s market also features five intra-baltic feeder connections, incl. four services by Seago Line from the new transshipment point in Gdańsk linking its deepwater terminal with all the main ports on the eastern Baltic coast. Also, Unifeeder provides a single intra-baltic link between Gdynia and Kaliningrad. Additionally, harbours in the Baltic have three connections to Spain (by K-Line, MacAndrews and X-Press), three lines to Iceland/the Faroe Islands (Eimskip and Samskip) and three links to the UK which bypass all hubs (Containerships, MacAndrews and Transatlantic). Besides the feeder/shortsea links, seven cross-ocean services enter the Baltic ports directly, ranging from the longest-running Atlantic Container Line s route from Canada and the USA, via the only Far East direct connection by Maersk Line and its South American banana loop, to the newest Caribbean link by CMA CGM. Even though another direct Far East loop to the Baltic was started by the G6 Alliance (a collaboration of APL, Hapag-Lloyd, HMM, MOL, NYK and OOCL) this year, the service was recently suspended and will resume operations no sooner than after the winter break. Our Baltic network lists two more ocean services (even though they can also be classified as shortsea or even domestic), namely Seago's Atlantic Sea Service from Morocco and Royal Arctic Line's link to Greenland and Iceland. Summing up presently as many as 105 regular container services call at ports of the BSR. The largest network belongs to Unifeeder (22 services). Team Lines follows the leader with 11 loops and CMA CGM stays in at a close third with 10 regular links. This expansive network serves a total of 37 ports and 52 terminals in the Baltic (as of September 2012). These are connected to six North Sea hubs and their 30 terminals, 25 other ports in Western Europe and 28 overseas destinations. 24 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Maritime traffic 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 25

Maritime traffic At the time of this yearbook s publication, the Baltic countries had already published statistics for H1 of 2012 (Denmark and Germany) or for the first eight months (the rest), so an outlook for the full year of 2012 seems reliable. So far, year-on-year container handlings decreased only in the ports of Denmark (by -4%) and in Klaipėda (-7%). The traffic was rather stable in Germany, Sweden and Russia (+1%). Finland grew by 6%, while Poland and Latvia featured double-digit growths of 20% and 25%, respectively. The only Estonian container port, Tallinn, also achieved a huge 22% increase in its yoy handlings. Such results indicate a possible total market growth of 5%, which literally translates into another record of 9.2 mln TEU throughput in 2012 for the Baltic Sea region. Photos: Swan Container Line 26 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Maritime traffic 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 27

7 Project guidelines 11 Maritime traffic 29 Rail traffic 29 Rail freight market in general 32 Intermodal traffic Tables 30 Tab. 1. Rail freight volumes in BSR countries (2010) 32 Tab. 2. Top 6 European rail freight operators (2010) Figures 30 Fig. 1. Share of railways in EU-27 freight market in years 2000-2010 (%) 31 Fig. 2. Rail freight in modal split of inland transport in EU-27 (2010) 32 Fig. 3. Intermodal units on rail in selected EU countries (2008/2010) 33 Fig. 4. Intermodal rail volumes in tonne-kilometres (2004/2010) 34 Fig. 5. Share of rail in container traffic to/from Gothenburg (2001-2011) 37 Shipping networks 59 Rail networks 77 Annexes

Rail traffic Rail traffic Photo: Destination Gotland Rail freight market in general With less than a 20% share in total European Union s inland freight transport pattern (measured in tonne-kilometres) throughout the last 12 years, rail continues to play a substantial role on the market. However, this role is far smaller than Wit was in, let s say, 1970s and still gradually decreases, giving way to the dominating road transport (76.4% in 2010). This rate does not apply to the huge Russian market, where railways comprise around 40% of the country s total goods traffic (and if you excluded the pipelines, this figure would rise above 80%). In 2011 the total tonnage transported by Russia's railways amounted to 1,242 mln tonnes with a total freight turnover of 2,128 bln tkm. 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 29

Rail traffic Fig. 1. Share of railways in EU-27 freight market in years 2000-2010 (%) 1 Remarks: 1 Based on Eurostat data Table 1 presents railway freight markets in the BSR (without Russian Federation) as well as their contribution to the total European Union rail transport performance. The whole EU-27 outcome in 2010 amounted to around 380 bln tkm and the Baltic Sea region countries were responsible for as much as 60% of this number. If we were to add the three main Baltic markets of Germany, Poland and Sweden alone, we would get a total of about 180 bln tkm, so almost 50% of each tonne-kilometer made annually in the European Union. Of course German supremacy is unquestionable. Its rail freight volume is twice as big as that of the second-placed Poland and four times bigger than that of Sweden (third position). Tab. 1. Rail freight volumes in BSR countries (2010) 1 Pos. Country Freight volumes (bln tkm) 1 Germany 107.3 28.3 2 Poland 48.7 12.9 3 Sweden 23.5 6.2 4 Latvia 17.2 4.5 5 Lithuania 13.4 3.5 6 Finland 9.8 2.6 7 Estonia 6.6 1.7 8 Denmark 2.2 0.6 Total: 228.7 60.0 Share in EU-27 (%) Remarks: 1 Based on Eurostat data, excl. Russia Even though the territories of the three Baltic States are relatively small (and their railway tracks short), their joint volume constitutes almost 10% of the EU s total, which seems to be mostly driven by the transit role they serve for Russia. These countries feature the biggest share of railways (40%) in their modal split in the whole Europe due to their strong connection to the railway system of Russia and their transit function. Yet, Sweden is right behind with its 39%, and this can be attributed to the long distance operations from north to south. Even though Finland s volumes in tkm are not huge, its share of rail in inland transportation is on the level of 25%. Germany and Poland the market leaders in terms of freight volumes follow with 22% and 19%, respectively. Photo: Kombiverkehr 30 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Rail traffic Fig. 2. Rail freight in modal split of inland transport in EU-27 (2010) 1 Remarks: 1 Based on Eurostat data Photo: Hupac Both German and Polish national rail operators are also the biggest market players in Europe, with a truly dominant position of Deutsche Bahn. This supremacy would be even stronger, if we were to take into account other strategic business units of the whole DB Group. As the result of its international expansion in recent years, it entered a few important freight markets in Europe (incl. Poland). The revenues of the entire holding reached almost EUR 38 billion in 2011, out of which more than 40% came from the DB Schenker Group. 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 31

Rail traffic Tab. 2. Top 6 European rail freight operators (2010) 1 Pos. Company Country Freight volumes (bln tkm) 1 DB Schenker Rail DE 105.8 27.0 2 PKP Cargo PL 31.6 8.1 3 Rail Cargo AT AT 25.9 6.6 4 Fret SNCF FR 22.8 5.8 5 ČD Cargo CZ 13.6 3.5 6 Trenitalia Cargo IT 12.0 3.1 Share in EU-27 (%) Remarks: 1 Based on European Rail Freight Market Study 2012. Developments Volumes Players. SCI-Multiklient Studies, 2012, shortened version and annual reports of DB, RCA, PKP Cargo, ČD, SNCF for 2010 Intermodal traffic Germany s supremacy in intermodal shipments carried on rail is even more striking than in total volumes. With 3.9 million intermodal units carried in 2010 (containers, trailers and other ro-ro unitized goods), its lead over the second largest market in Europe (Austria) and the BSR (Sweden) is fourfold and eightfold respectively (see fig. 3). German intermodal traffic noted significant growth since 2004 and is now practically back on its pre-crisis levels (a total of 4.1 mln units carried in 2011). A low share of intermodal freight in new EU member states (Poland, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania) comes from their raw materials oriented economies and the obsolete structure of their energy sectors. Coal and its derivatives comprise almost half of today s rail freight in Poland, whereas highly processed goods constitute only about 10% of those volumes (compared to 40-50% in countries like Austria, France or Italy). Almost 144 thousand intermodal units were carried by rail in Denmark in 2010, mostly in transit between Scandinavia and the continent. Intermodal traffic in Finland amounts to only 59 thou. units per year and is therefore marginal in the total unitized goods transportation in this country. This is mostly due to the country s main industrial production and municipalities being located along the sea coast, thus naturally relying on sea transport. Fig. 3. Intermodal units on rail in selected EU countries (2008/2010) 1 Photo: Hupac Remarks: 1 Based on UTK Report Estimations featured in the annual reports published by TransContainer and Russian Railways (RZD) imply that the total number of containers transported on rail in 2010 in Russia was on the level of 2.6 mln units, TransContainer accounting for 52% share of this traffic. The share of intermodal operations in the overall rail freight volumes (calculated in tkm) is an interesting aspect of this market sector s development. The average share for the EU-27 is 17.67%, and Germany is the only country in the BSR that is above this level (29%). The intermodal traffic in Sweden accounts for 3.4 bln tkm, which is about 13% in comparison to its total volumes. The Polish market features one of the lowest shares of intermodal operations in the whole Europe (3.9% only). On the other hand, Poland s market dynamics are very high (100% growth in the 2004-2010 period). 32 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Rail traffic Fig. 4 Intermodal rail volumes in tonne-kilometres (2004/2010) 1 Remarks: 1 Based on UTK Report Photo: Hupac Intermodal traffic in the Baltic Sea region is jointly operated by as much as 31 (mostly private) operators with a well established and fast expanding network of more than 160 regular train services to/from and within the region. Again, Germany is in the lead, with its major players being Kombiverkehr and Hupac. Both companies link numerous locations within Germany and Poland, as well as offer international services to other European countries, like the Czech Republic, Hungary, Austria, Switzerland, Italy or France. The internal Swedish market is basically served by the country s national railways subsidiary, Green Cargo, but we should also note a significant network of several smaller operators. An interesting segment of the market is also being built up to/from Norway, provided by the Norwegian CargoNet. The most important destination for intermodal trains in this region is the Port of Gothenburg, which takes in a huge share of all its containers on rail (42%). This share was more or less stable since 2008, reaching its peaks (about 45%) in years 2008 and 2009 (figure 5). ECOLOGISTICALLY Tallinn Hamburg Bremerhaven Rotterdam Gdańsk Hub Poznań Wrocław Łódź Katowice Riga Vilnius Šeštokai Warszawa Isov Minsk Małaszewicze Kishinev Kiev Odessa Kaluga Moscow Rostov-on-Don Nizhny Novgorod Samara Oral Atyrau Yekaterinburg Astana Aktobe Karaganda Zhezkazgan Poti Tbilisi Aktau Yerevan Baku Tashkent Turkmenbashi Buchara POLZUG Intermodal GmbH Container Burchardkai, Hamburg Tel.: + 49 40-74 11 45-0 E-Mail: hamburg@polzug.de POLZUG Intermodal POLSKA Sp. z o.o. ul. Ks. l. Skorupki 5, Warszawa Tel.: + 48 22-336 34 00 E-Mail: warszawa.info@polzug.pl www.polzug.de 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 33

Rail traffic Fig. 5 Share of rail in container traffic to/from Gothenburg (2001-2011) In Poland the expansion is mainly driven by a dynamic development of container terminals in its sea ports, as well as the railway infrastructure investment program carried out by the Polish Railways infrastructure managing company PKP PLK. The most wide-ranging networks are provided by Cargosped, PCC Intermodal and Polzug Intermodal, all covering not only the territory of Poland, but also direct connections to the North Sea hubs of Hamburg, Bremerhaven, Rotterdam and Antwerp. Baltic Rail a new entrant to the market offers a regular link in the north-south axis from the ports in Gdańsk and Gdynia to Koper in Slovenia. Recently Poland has welcomed its first shuttle container trains operated by a shipping line (Maersk Line) and connected to the only direct Baltic Far East shipping loop. Since the beginning of 2012 Poland has also been connected by a regular container train to Russia provided by PCC Intermodal from Kutno (near Warsaw) to Moscow. There are actually several more intermodal trains to the capital of the Russian Federation, running from Klaipėda, Riga, and Tallinn (by FESCO, Lithuanian Railways, Trans- Container, TFS Trans and EVR Cargo). Meanwhile, the region is also connected by intermodal trains to Belarus (LDz Cargo Logistika, subsidiary of Latvian Railways), Uzbekistan (Lithuanian Railways) and Kazakhstan (FESCO). Most of the multi-service operators usually build their networks on least one inland hub terminal used to consolidate shipments coming on shuttle trains to/from the sea ports. Hupac links Poland and Germany via their hub in Schwarzheide (south-east Germany) and then also Duisburg, Köln and Ludwigshafen on relations to North Sea ports and Southern Europe. Kombiverkehr links German Baltic ports majorly via intermediate points in Hamburg and Duisburg. PCC Intermodal s key transshipment point for Poland is Kutno (near Warsaw) and Polzug operates via their hub in Gądki (near Poznań). The Swedish main player Green Cargo transfers their shipments through a consolidation terminal in Hallsberg. Traditionally the network is much wider in the west, but a noteworthy fact is that all transit ports to Russia already feature regular intermodal trains to Moscow. This does not apply to any of the Russian ports, but it is definitely not an indicator for lack of rail-carried containers in Russia, just not (yet) on a fixed timetable basis. Right now, there are serious plans to start a fixed rail direct train from Gdańsk to Moscow. But if this results in a reliable alternative towards feeders (not only in winter, but also during the summer), or just another trail run, we will try to answer next year. 34 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Rail traffic Photo: Green Cargo 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 35

7 Project guidelines 11 Maritime traffic 29 Rail traffic 37 Shipping networks Tables 38 Tab. 1. Regular container services to/from/within BSR (October 2012) 44 Tab. 2. Sea ports and terminals in regular container traffic to/from/within the BSR (October 2012) 45 Tab. 3. codes utilized in tables/maps (October 2012) Maps of shipping operators 46 MSC 46 X-Press Feeders 47 SCA Transforest 47 Tschudi Lines 48 Maersk Line 48 Seago Line 49 Containerships 49 Samskip 49 Eimskip 50 Unifeeder 50 Mann Lines 51 OOCL 51 Team Lines 52 CMA CGM 52 TransAtlantic 53 APL 53 Swan Container Line 54 Atlantic Container Line 54 Hapag Lloyd 54 Green Feeder 54 Royal Arctic Line 55 Delta Shipping Lines 55 K-Line 56 Merilinja 56 Hacklin Seatrans 57 Sea Connect 57 MacAndrews 59 Rail networks 77 Annexes

Shipping networks Shipping networks Photo: Global Ports 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 37

Shipping networks Tab. 1. Regular container services to/from/within BSR (October 2012) OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY APL Germany Tallinn Express Hamburg CTA DE feeder Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Tallinn Muuga EE Hamburg CTA DE APL Russia Express Bremerhaven Eurogate DE feeder Hamburg CTA DE St. Petersburg FCT RU Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Atlantic Container Line A Service Hamburg Unikai DE ocean Gothenburg APMT SE Antwerp PSA Europa BE Liverpool RSCT GB Halifax South End CA New York APMT USA Port Newark FAPS USA Baltimore Dundalk USA Norfolk NIT USA New York APMT USA Halifax South End CA Liverpool RSCT GB Antwerp PSA Europa BE Hamburg Unikai DE CMA CGM Baltic Feeder (loop 1) Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder HaminaKotka Kotka FI Helsinki Steveco FI Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE CMA CGM Baltic Feeder (loop 2) Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Gdynia GCT PL Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE CMA CGM Danbot Feeder Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder Fredericia FCT DK Copenhagen CCT DK Halmstad Kattegat SE Szczecin DB Port Szczecin PL Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE CMA CGM FEMEX Scandinavian Shuttle Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder Aarhus APMT-CS DK Helsingborg Vasthamnen SE Gothenburg APMT SE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE CMA CGM Gdańsk Riga Feeder Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder Gdańsk GTK PL Riga BCT, RCT LV Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE CMA CGM Kaliningrad Feeder Zeebrugge PSA CHZ BE feeder Kaliningrad KSCP RU Rauma Rauma Stevedoring FI Gävle GCT SE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Zeebrugge PSA CHZ BE CMA CGM Klaipėda Feeder Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder Gdynia GCT PL Klaipėda KCT LT Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE CMA CGM Norway Feeder Rotterdam ECT Delta, ECT City NL feeder Oslo SCT NO Moss MCT NO Gothenburg APMT SE Rotterdam ECT Delta, ECT City NL OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY CMA CGM St. Petersburg Shuttle Service A Zeebrugge PSA CHZ BE feeder Antwerp Antwerp Gateway BE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Ust-Luga ULCT RU St. Petersburg FCT, PLP RU Zeebrugge PSA CHZ BE CMA CGM St. Petersburg Shuttle Service B Zeebrugge PSA CHZ BE feeder Rotterdam ECT City, ECT Delta, NL Uniport St. Petersburg FCT, PLP RU Zeebrugge PSA CHZ BE CMA CGM St. Petersburg Shuttle Service C Rotterdam ECT City, ECT Delta, NL Uniport feeder Zeebrugge PSA CHZ BE St. Petersburg FCT, PLP RU Rotterdam ECT City, ECT Delta, NL Uniport CMA CGM ECS (Europe Caribbean Service) Kingston KCT JM ocean Rotterdam Uniport, ECT Delta NL Hamburg CTB DE St. Petersburg FCT, PLP RU Tallinn Muuga EE Hamburg CTB DE Rotterdam ECT Delta, Uniport NL Antwerp Antwerp Gateway BE Le Havre EAT FR Kingston KCT JM Cartagena Contecar CO Santo Tomas de Empornac GP Castilla Puerto Cortes ENP HN Puerto Moin Moin CR Limon Kingston KCT JM Containerships Loop 1 Helsinki Multi-Link FI shortsea Riga RUT LV Teesport TCT GB Rotterdam RST NL Helsinki Multi-Link FI St. Petersburg Moby Dik RU Containerships Loop 2 Helsinki Multi-Link FI shortsea St. Petersburg Moby Dik RU Pori Hacklin FI Klaipėda KCT LT Teesport TCT GB Sheerness Container Park GB Ghent GCT BE Riga RUT LV St. Petersburg Moby Dik RU Containerships Loop 3 Helsinki Multi-Link FI shortsea Klaipėda KCT LT Teesport TCT GB Rotterdam RST NL Riga RUT LV Helsinki Multi-Link FI St. Petersburg Moby Dik RU Containerships Loop 4 Helsinki Multi-Link FI shortsea St. Petersburg Moby Dik RU Rotterdam RST NL Hamburg Buss Hansa, CTA DE Aarhus APMT-CS DK St. Petersburg Moby Dik RU 38 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Shipping networks OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY Containerships Loop 5 Helsinki Multi-Link FI shortsea St. Petersburg Moby Dik RU Aarhus APMT-CS DK Hamburg Buss Hansa, CTA DE St. Petersburg Moby Dik RU Containerships Loop 6 St. Petersburg Moby Dik RU shortsea Teesport TCT GB Rotterdam RST NL Klaipėda KCT LT Helsinki Multi-Link FI St. Petersburg Moby Dik RU Delta Shipping Lines Loop 1 Dunkirk NFTI FR shortsea Rotterdam ECT Delta, Uniport NL Hamburg Buss Hansa DE St. Petersburg PLP, CTSP, FCT RU Dunkirk NFTI FR Delta Shipping Lines Loop 2 Rotterdam ECT Delta, Uniport NL shortsea Aarhus APMT-CS DK St. Petersburg PLP, CTSP, FCT, Moby Dik RU Gothenburg APMT SE Rotterdam ECT Delta, RST NL Eimskip Eastern Route Tórshavn Molin FO feeder/shortsea Aarhus APMT-CS DK Fredrikstad FCT NO Tórshavn Molin FO Eimskip Northern Route Reykjavik Sundabakki IS feeder/shortsea Reydarfjordur Reydarfjordur IS Tórshavn Molin FO Rotterdam Uniport NL Hamburg Buss Hansa DE Helsingborg Vasthamnen SE Aarhus APMT-CS DK Tórshavn Molin FO Grundartangi GRT IS Reykjavik Sundabakki IS Green Feeder Service 1 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE feeder Halmstad Kattegat SE Gothenburg APMT SE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Green Feeder Service 2 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE feeder Copenhagen CCT DK Helsingborg Vasthamnen SE Aarhus APMT-CS DK Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Hacklin Seatrans Pori-Hamburg Pori Hacklin FI feeder/shortsea Hamburg C. Steinweg, Eurogate, DE CTA, CTB Pori Hacklin FI Hapag-Lloyd Russia Express Service Bremerhaven Eurogate DE feeder Hamburg CTA, CTB DE Gdynia GCT PL St. Petersburg FCT, PLP RU Helsinki Steveco FI Gdynia GCT PL Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Hapag-Lloyd Baltic Feeder Bremerhaven Eurogate DE feeder Hamburg CTA, CTB DE Tallinn Muuga EE Riga RUT LV Bremerhaven Eurogate DE K-Line IBESCO-A Gijón TCG ES feeder Lisbon SOGATUS PT Leixões TCL PT Felixstowe Trinity GB Teesport TCT GB Gothenburg APMT SE Aarhus APMT-CS DK Rotterdam ECT EMX NL Gijón TCG ES MacAndrews UK-PL (loop 1) Hull HCT GB shortsea Gdynia GCT PL Hull HCT GB MacAndrews Scan Baltic Service Gdynia GCT PL shortsea Tilbury SSCT GB Bilbao ATM ES Tilbury SSCT GB Gothenburg APMT SE Gdynia GCT PL Maersk Line AE 10 Gdańsk DCT PL ocean Aarhus APMT-CS DK Gothenburg APMT SE Bremerhaven NTB DE Rotterdam APMT NL Tangier APMT MA Suez SCCT EG Singapore PSA SG SG Yantian YICT CN Hong Kong MTL CN Kwangyang KKT KR Ningbo Meishan CN Shanghai SGH CN Yantian YICT CN Tanjung Pelepas PTP MY Suez SCCT EG Rotterdam APMT NL Bremerhaven NTB DE Gdańsk DCT PL Maersk Line ECUBEX St. Petersburg PLP RU ocean Bremerhaven NTB DE Rotterdam APMT NL Antwerp PSA Deurganck BE Santa Marta SMITCO CO Manzanillo MIT PA Balboa BCT PA Guayaquil GCMT EC Balboa BCT PA Manzanillo MIT PA Santa Marta SMITCO CO Rotterdam APMT NL Hamburg Eurogate DE Bremerhaven NTB DE St. Petersburg PLP RU Mann Lines Service 1 Hamburg CTB DE feeder/shortsea Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Kaliningrad KSCP RU Hamburg CTB DE 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 39

Shipping networks OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY Mann Lines Service 2 Rotterdam RST NL feeder/shortsea Gdynia GCT PL Kaliningrad KSCP RU Riga RCT LV Rotterdam RST NL Merilinja Kokkola-Antwerp Kokkola AWT FI feeder/shortsea Oulu Oritkari FI Antwerp MSC Home BE Rotterdam RST NL St. Petersburg NMT, PLP RU Kokkola AWT FI MSC Loop 1 Antwerp MSC Home BE feeder St. Petersburg FCT RU Antwerp MSC Home BE MSC Loop 2 Antwerp MSC Home BE feeder Bremerhaven MSC Gate, NTB DE HaminaKotka Kotka, Hamina FI Helsinki Multi-Link FI Antwerp MSC Home BE MSC Loop 3 Antwerp MSC Home BE feeder Teesport TCT GB Bremerhaven MSC Gate, NTB DE Kaliningrad BCT RU Rauma Rauma Stevedoring FI Antwerp MSC Home BE MSC Loop 4 Rotterdam ECT Delta NL feeder Bremerhaven MSC Gate, NTB DE Gdynia BCT PL Klaipėda Smelte LT Bremerhaven MSC Gate DE Rotterdam ECT Delta NL MSC Loop 5 Rotterdam ECT Delta NL feeder Bremerhaven MSC Gate, NTB DE Gothenburg APMT SE Helsingborg Vasthamnen SE Rotterdam ECT Delta NL MSC Loop 7 Bremerhaven MSC Gate, NTB DE feeder Rotterdam ECT Delta NL St. Petersburg CTSP RU Bremerhaven MSC Gate DE MSC Loop 8 Antwerp MSC Home BE feeder Bremerhaven MSC Gate, NTB DE Klaipėda Smelte LT Stockholm Frihamnen SE Gävle GCT SE Norrköping Pampus SE Antwerp MSC Home BE MSC Loop 9 Antwerp MSC Home BE feeder Aarhus APMT-CS DK Fredericia FCT DK Copenhagen CCT DK Antwerp MSC Home BE MSC Loop 10 Antwerp MSC Home BE feeder Bremerhaven MSC Gate DE Riga BCT LV Tallinn Muuga EE Antwerp MSC Home BE 40 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012 OOCL Germany LT Express Bremerhaven Eurogate DE feeder Hamburg CTA, CTB DE Klaipėda KCT LT Bremerhaven Eurogate DE OOCL Scan Baltic Express 1 (SBX1) Rotterdam ECT Delta NL feeder Antwerp PSA Noordzee BE St. Petersburg FCT RU Gdynia BCT PL Hamburg CTA, CTB DE Gdynia BCT PL St. Petersburg FCT RU Rotterdam ECT Delta NL OOCL Scan Baltic Express 2 (SBX2) Hamburg CTA, CTB DE feeder St. Petersburg FCT RU Rauma Rauma Stevedoring FI Gävle GCT SE Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Hamburg CTA DE Klaipėda KCT LT St. Petersburg PLP RU HaminaKotka Kotka FI Hamburg CTA, CTB DE OOCL Scan Baltic Express 3 (SBX3) Hamburg CTA, CTB DE feeder St. Petersburg FCT RU Hamburg CTA, CTB DE Royal Arctic Line Atlantic Service Aalborg ACT DK ocean Reykjavik Holtabakki IS Nuuk Nuuk GL Aasiaat Aasiaat GL Sisimiut Sisimiut GL Nuuk Nuuk GL Aalborg ACT DK Samskip Iceland-Aarhus Reykjavik Holtabakki IS feeder/shortsea Vestmannaeyjar VEY IS Immingham Exxtor GB Rotterdam RST NL Cuxhaven Cuxport DE Varberg VCT SE Aarhus APMT-CS DK Tórshavn Kollafjørður FO Reykjavik Holtabakki IS SCA Transforest N. Sweden-Rotterdam Sundsvall Interforest SE feeder/shortsea Umeå Holmsund SE Rotterdam ECT Delta, Interforest, NL Uniport Stockholm Frihamnen SE St. Petersburg PLP, FCT, CTSP RU Sundsvall Interforest SE Sea Connect Rotterdam-Baltics- Rotterdam ECT Delta, ECT EMX, NL St. Petersburg Uniport feeder/shortsea Klaipėda KCT LT Tallinn Muuga EE St. Petersburg PLP, NMT, CTSP, Rusmarine RU Rotterdam ECT Delta, ECT EMX, NL Uniport Sea Connect Rotterdam-Hamburg- Rotterdam ECT Delta, ECT EMX, NL St. Petersburg Uniport feeder/shortsea Hamburg C. Steinweg, Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE St. Petersburg PLP, NMT, CTSP, Rusmarine RU Rotterdam ECT Delta, ECT EMX, Uniport NL

Shipping networks OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY Seago Line AE 10 Eastbound Gdańsk DCT PL feeder/shortsea Aarhus APMT-CS DK Gothenburg APMT SE Bremerhaven NTB DE Rotterdam APMT NL Seago Line AE 10 Westbound Rotterdam APMT NL feeder/shortsea Bremerhaven NTB DE Gdańsk DCT PL Seago Line Atlantic Sea Service Casablanca CASA MA shortsea Agadir ACT MA Rotterdam APMT NL Bremerhaven NTB DE Helsingborg Vasthamnen SE Copenhagen CCT DK Bremerhaven NTB DE Antwerp PSA Deurganck BE Casablanca CASA MA Seago Line ECUBEX Eastbound St. Petersburg PLP RU feeder/shortsea Bremerhaven NTB DE Rotterdam APMT NL Antwerp PSA Deurganck BE Seago Line ECUBEX Westbound Rotterdam APMT NL feeder/shortsea Hamburg Eurogate DE Bremerhaven NTB DE St. Petersburg PLP RU Seago Line Gdańsk Finnish Gulf Service Gdańsk DCT PL feeder/shortsea HaminaKotka Kotka FI Helsinki Finnsteve FI Gdańsk DCT PL Seago Line Gdańsk Baltic Service Gdańsk DCT PL feeder/shortsea Klaipėda KCT LT Riga RCT LV Tallinn Muuga EE Gdańsk DCT PL Seago Line Gdańsk Kaliningrad Service Gdańsk DCT PL feeder/shortsea Kaliningrad BCT RU Gdańsk DCT PL Seago Line Gdańsk St. Petersburg Service Gdańsk DCT PL feeder/shortsea St. Petersburg FCT RU Gdańsk DCT PL Seago Line Russia Express Service Wilhelmshaven Eurogate DE feeder/shortsea Bremerhaven NTB DE St. Petersburg FCT RU HaminaKotka Kotka FI Bremerhaven NTB DE Wilhelmshaven Eurogate DE Seago Line Riga Service Bremerhaven NTB DE feeder/shortsea Klaipėda KCT LT Riga BCT, RCT LV Aarhus APMT-CS DK Bremerhaven NTB DE Seago Line Scandinavian Service Bremerhaven NTB DE feeder/shortsea Aarhus APMT-CS DK Gothenburg APMT SE Bremerhaven NTB DE Seago Line St. Petersburg Rauma Service Bremerhaven NTB DE feeder/shortsea St. Petersburg PLP RU HaminaKotka Kotka FI Rauma Rauma Stevedoring FI Bremerhaven NTB DE Swan Container Line Rotterdam-St. Petersburg Rotterdam ECT City, ECT Delta NL feeder/shortsea Hamburg Buss Hansa, Eurogate, DE CTA, CTB, CTT St. Petersburg PLP, FCT RU Rotterdam ECT City, ECT Delta NL Team Lines DSW 1 Bremerhaven Eurogate DE feeder Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Fredericia FCT DK Copenhagen CCT DK Helsingborg Vasthamnen SE Aarhus APMT-CS DK Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Team Lines FIN 1 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Turku Finnsteve FI HaminaKotka Kotka FI Helsinki Steveco FI Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Team Lines FIN 2 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder HaminaKotka Kotka FI Helsinki Steveco FI Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Team Lines NOR 1 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Gothenburg APMT SE Oslo SCT NO Moss MCT NO Brevik NST NO Gothenburg APMT SE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Team Lines NOR 2 Bremerhaven Eurogate DE feeder Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Gothenburg APMT SE Halden Norske Skog NO Oslo SCT NO Kristiansand KST NO Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Team Lines POL 1 Bremerhaven Eurogate DE feeder Hamburg CTA, CTB, CTT DE Gdynia BCT, GCT PL Gdańsk DCT, GTK PL Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Team Lines POL 2 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Gdańsk DCT, GTK PL Szczecin DB Port Szczecin PL Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Team Lines POL 3 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE feeder Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Gdynia BCT, GCT PL Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Team Lines RUS 1 Bremerhaven Eurogate DE feeder Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Riga BCT LV Tallinn Muuga EE St. Petersburg FCT RU Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Bremerhaven Eurogate DE 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 41

Shipping networks OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY Team Lines SWE 1 Bremerhaven Eurogate DE feeder Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB DE Stockholm Frihamnen SE Norrköping Pampus SE Åhus ACT SE Bremerhaven Eurogate DE TransAtlantic Trans Feeder Line North Raahe RCT FI feeder Oulu Oritkari FI Tornio Röyttä FI Kemi Ajos FI Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Raahe RCT FI TransAtlantic Trans Feeder Line South (loop 1) Södertälje Sydhamnen SE feeder/shortsea Oxelösund Stålhamnen SE Åhus ACT SE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Bremerhaven Eurogate DE Södertälje Sydhamnen SE TransAtlantic Trans Feeder Line South (loop 2) Bremerhaven Eurogate DE feeder/shortsea Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Södertälje Sydhamnen SE Västerås Västra Hamnen SE Bremerhaven Eurogate DE TransAtlantic Trans Pal Line Västerås Västra Hamnen SE shortsea Oxelösund Stålhamnen SE Norrköping Pampus SE Åhus ACT SE Szczecin DB Port Szczecin PL Hull King George Dock GB Amsterdam Velsen Noord NL Västerås Västra Hamnen SE Tschudi Lines Baltic Services Helsinki Finnsteve FI shortsea Tallinn Muuga EE Klaipėda KCT LT Esbjerg ECT DK Immingham Exxtor GB Rotterdam RST NL Helsinki Finnsteve FI Tschudi Lines North Sea Service Drammen SSG NO shortsea Moss MCT NO Larvik LCT NO Esbjerg ECT DK Immingham Exxtor GB Rotterdam RST NL Drammen SSG NO Unifeeder Baltic States Service 2 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE feeder/shortsea Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Klaipėda KCT, Smelte LT Tallinn Muuga EE Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Unifeeder Baltic States Service 3 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE feeder/shortsea Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Klaipėda KCT, Smelte LT Riga BCT LV Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE 42 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012 Unifeeder Baltic States Service 4 Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport feeder/shortsea Riga BCT LV Klaipėda KCT, Smelte LT Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport Unifeeder Danish Service Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE feeder/shortsea Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Fredericia FCT DK Copenhagen CCT DK Kalundborg KCT DK Aarhus APMT-CS DK Fredericia FCT DK Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Unifeeder Finnish Service 1 Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE feeder/shortsea Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE HaminaKotka Hamina FI Helsinki Finnsteve FI HaminaKotka Kotka FI Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Unifeeder Finnish Service 2 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE feeder/shortsea Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE HaminaKotka Kotka FI Rauma Rauma Stevedoring FI Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Unifeeder Finnish Service 4 Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport feeder/shortsea Zeebrugge APMT, PSA CHZ BE Helsinki Steveco FI HaminaKotka Kotka FI Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport Unifeeder Norway Service 2 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE feeder/shortsea Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Oslo OCT NO Fredrikstad FCT NO Gothenburg APMT SE Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Unifeeder Norway Service 4 Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport feeder/shortsea Fredrikstad FCT NO Larvik Revkai Syd NO Gothenburg APMT SE Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport Unifeeder Polish Service 1 Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE feeder/shortsea Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Szczecin DB Port Szczecin PL Gdynia BCT, GCT PL Gdańsk DCT, GTK PL Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Unifeeder Polish Service 2 Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport feeder/shortsea Gdynia BCT, GCT PL Szczecin DB Port Szczecin PL Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport Unifeeder Polish Service 3 Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport feeder/shortsea Gdynia BCT, GCT PL Gdańsk DCT, GTK PL Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport

Shipping networks OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY OPERATOR SERVICE PORTS TERMINALS COUNTRY Unifeeder Poland-Russia Service Gdynia BCT, GCT PL feeder/shortsea Kaliningrad KSCP RU Gdynia BCT, GCT PL Unifeeder Russia Service 1 Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE feeder/shortsea Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE St. Petersburg FCT, PLP, CTSP RU Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Unifeeder Russia Service 2 Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE feeder/shortsea Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE St. Petersburg FCT, PLP, CTSP RU Klaipėda KCT, Smelte LT Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Unifeeder Russia Service 3 Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport feeder/shortsea Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE St. Petersburg PLP RU Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport Unifeeder Russia Service 4 Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport feeder/shortsea Antwerp Antwerp Gateway, PSA BE Deurganck Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Ust-Luga ULCT RU St. Petersburg FCT, PLP, CTSP RU Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 1 Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE feeder/shortsea Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Malmö Northern Harbour SE Gothenburg APMT SE Halmstad Kattegat SE Helsingborg Vasthamnen SE Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 2 Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE feeder/shortsea Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT DE Copenhagen CCT DK Aarhus APMT-CS DK Fredericia FCT DK Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB DE Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 3 Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport feeder/shortsea Antwerp Antwerp Gateway, PSA BE Deurganck Copenhagen CCT DK Helsingborg Vasthamnen SE Aarhus APMT-CS DK Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 4 Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport feeder/shortsea Oslo OCT NO Fredrikstad FCT NO Larvik Revkai Syd NO Gothenburg APMT SE Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 6 Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport feeder/shortsea Gothenburg APMT SE Stockholm Frihamnen SE Gävle GCT SE Rauma Rauma Stevedoring FI Antwerp Antwerp Gateway, PSA BE Deurganck Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT City, NL ECT EMX, RST, Uniport X-Press Feeders Aalborg Gothenburg X-Press Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT EMX NL feeder Aalborg ACT DK Gothenburg APMT SE Rotterdam APMT, ECT Delta, ECT EMX NL X-Press Feeders Bilbao Gothenburg X-Press Gothenburg APMT SE feeder Rotterdam ECT Delta, ECT EMX NL Gijón TCG ES Bilbao ATM ES Le Havre CNMP Atlantique FR Rotterdam ECT Delta, ECT EMX NL Gothenburg APMT SE 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 43

Shipping networks Tab. 2. Sea ports and terminals in regular container traffic to/from/within the BSR (October 2012) BALTIC SEA COUNTRIES EUROPE OTHERS ESTONIA Tallinn DENMARK Aalborg Aarhus Copenhagen Esbjerg Fredericia Kalundborg FINLAND HaminaKotka Helsinki Kemi Kokkola Oulu Pori Raahe Rauma Tornio Turku LATVIA Riga LITHUANIA Klaipėda POLAND Gdańsk Gdynia Szczecin RUSSIA (BALTIC) Kaliningrad St. Petersburg Ust-Luga SWEDEN Åhus Gävle Gothenburg Halmstad Helsingborg Malmö Norrköping Oxelösund Södertälje Stockholm Sundsvall Umeå Varberg Västerås Muuga ACT APMT-CS CCT ECT FCT KCT Hamina, Kotka Steveco, Finnsteve, Multi-Link Ajos AWT Oritkari Hacklin RCT Rauma Stevedoring Röyttä Finnsteve BCT, RCT, RUT KCT, Smelte DCT, GTK BCT, GCT DB Port Szczecin BCT, KSCP CTSP, FCT, Moby Dik, NMT, PLP, Rusmarine ULCT ACT GCT APMT Kattegat Vasthamnen Northern Harbour Pampus Stålhamnen Sydhamnen Frihamnen Interforest Holmsund VCT Västra Hamnen BELGIUM Antwerp Ghent Zeebrugge FAROE ISLANDS Tórshavn FRANCE Dunkirk Le Havre GERMANY (NORTH SEA) Bremerhaven Cuxhaven Hamburg Wilhelmshaven GREENLAND Aasiaat Nuuk Sisimiut ICELAND Grundartangi Reydarfjordur Reykjavik Vestmannaeyjar NORWAY Brevik Drammen Fredrikstad Halden Kristiansand Larvik Moss Oslo PORTUGAL Leixões Lisbon SPAIN Bilbao Gijón THE NETHERLANDS Amsterdam Rotterdam THE UNITED KINGDOM Felixstowe Hull Immingham Liverpool Antwerp Gateway, MSC Home, PSA Deurganck, PSA Europa, PSA Noordzee GCT APMT, PSA CHZ Kollafjørður NFTI CNMP Atlantique, EAT Eurogate, MSC Gate, NTB Cuxport Buss Hansa, C. Steinweg, CTA, CTB, CTT, Eurogate, Unikai Eurogate Aasiaat Nuuk Sisimiut GRT Reydarfjordur Holtabakki, Sundabakki VEY NST SSG FCT Norske Skog KST LCT, Revkai Syd MCT OCT, SCT TCL SOGATUS ATM TCG Velsen Noord APMT, ECT City, ECT Delta, ECT EMX, Interforest, RST, Uniport Trinity HCT, King George Dock Exxtor RSCT CANADA Halifax CHINA Hong Kong Ningbo Shanghai Yantian COLOMBIA Cartagena Santa Marta COSTA RICA Puerto Moin Limon ECUADOR Guayaquil EGYPT Suez GUATEMALA Santo Tomas de Castilla HONDURAS Puerto Cortes JAMAICA Kingston MALAYSIA Tanjung Pelepas MOROCCO Agadir Casablanca Tangier PANAMA Balboa Manzanillo SINGAPORE Singapore SOUTH KOREA Kwangyang USA Baltimore New York Norfolk Port Newark South End MTL Meishan SGH YICT Contecar SMITCO Moin GCMT SCCT Empornac ENP KCT PTP ACT CASA APMT BCT MIT PSA Singapore KKT Dundalk APMT NIT FAPS Sheerness Container Park Teesport TCT Tilbury SSCT 44 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Shipping networks Tab. 3. codes utilized in tables/maps (October 2012) TERMINALS CODE TERMINALS CODE TERMINALS CODE Aalborg Container ACT HHLA CT Burchardkai CTB Röyttä Röyttä Aasiaat Port Aasiaat HHLA CT Tollerort CTT Rusmarine Forwarding Rusmarine Abra es Marítimas ATM Holmsund Holmsund Santa Marta International Company SMITCO Agadir Container ACT Holtabakki s Holtabakki SGH Shengdong SGH Åhus Container ACT Hull Container HCT Short Sea Container SSCT Ajos Ajos Interforest Interforest Sisimiut Port Sisimiut APM s-cargo Service APMT-CS APM s Gothenburg APMT APM s Port Elisabeth APMT APM s Rotterdam APMT APM s Tangier APMT APM s Zeebrugge APMT Balboa Container BCT Baltic Container Gdynia BCT Baltic Container Riga BCT Baltiysk Container BCT Buss Hansa Buss Hansa C. Steinweg (Süd-West ) C. Steinweg Cartagena Contecar Contecar Casablanca Container CCT Container & Multipurpose s Guayaquil GCMT Container Park Container Park Container Frihamnen Frihamnen Container Saint-Petersburg CTSP Copenhagen Container CCT Cuxport Cuxport DB Port DB Port Deepwater Container Gdańsk DCT DP World Antwerp Gateway Antwerp Gateway Dundalk Marine Dundalk ECT City ECT City ECT Delta ECT Delta ECT Euromax ECT EMX Empresa Nacional Portuaria ENP Empresa Portuaria Nacional Santo Tomas Empornac Esbjerg Container ECT Eurogate Container Wilhelmshaven Eurogate EUROGATE CT Bremerhaven Eurogate EUROGATE CT Hamburg Eurogate Europe-Atlantique EAT Exxtor Exxtor FAPS FAPS Finnsteve Finnsteve First Container FCT Fredericia Container FCT Fredrikstad Container FCT Gävle Container GCT Gdańsk Container GTK Gdynia Container GCT Ghent Container GCT GRT-Grundartangi GRT Hacklin Hacklin Hamina Hamina HHLA CT Altenwerder CTA Kaliningrad Sea Commercial Port Kalundborg Container Kattegat King George Dock Kingston Container Klaipėda Container Klaipėdos Smelte Kollafjørður Kotka KST Kwangyang Kukje Larvik Container Manzanillo International Meishan Container MEO /Velsen Noord Moby Dik Modern s Moss Container MSC Gate Bremerhaven MSC Home Muuga Container Neva-Metall Nord France International Norfolk International Norske Skog Northern Harbour NorthSea NTB North Sea Bremerhaven Nuuk Port Oritkari Oslo Container Pampus Container Pelabuhan Tanjung Pelepas Petrolesport PSA Container Handling Zeebrugge PSA Container s PSA Deurganck PSA Europa PSA Noordzee Raahe Container Rauma Stevedoring Revkai Syd Reydarfjördur-Mjóeyri Reykjavik Eimskip Sundabakki Kleppsbakki Riga Container Riga Universal Rotterdam Shortsea s Royal Seaforth Container KSCP KCT Kattegat King George Dock KCT KCT Smelte Kollafjørður Kotka KST KKT LCT MIT Meishan Velsen Noord Moby Dik MTL MCT MSC Gate MSC Home Muuga NMT NFTI NIT Norske Skog Northern Harbour NST NTB Nuuk Oritkari OCT Pampus PTP PLP PSA CHZ PSA Singapore PSA Deurganck PSA Europa PSA Noordzee RCT Rauma Stevedoring Revkai Syd Reydarfjordur Sundabakki RCT RUT RST RSCT SOGATUS de Contentores de Santa Apolónia South End Container SSG Container Stålhamnen Suez Canal Container Sydhamnen Teesport Container de Contenedores de Gijón de Contentores de Leixões of Moin Tórshavn Molin Trinity s Unikai Uniport Multipurpose s Ust-Luga Container Varberg Container Vasthamnen Container Västra Hamnen VEY Vestmannaeyjar Binnabryggja Skalinn Vuosaari (Finnsteve) Vuosaari (Multi-Link s) Vuosaari (Steveco) Yantian International Container s SOGATUS South End SSG Stålhamnen SCCT Sydhamnen TCT TCG TCL Moin Molin Trinity Unikai Uniport ULCT VCT Vasthamnen Västra Hamnen VEY Finnsteve Multi-Link Steveco YICT 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 45

Shipping networks 46 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Shipping networks 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 47

Shipping networks 48 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Shipping networks 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 49

Shipping networks 50 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Shipping networks 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 51

Shipping networks 52 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Shipping networks 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 53

Shipping networks 54 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Shipping networks 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 55

Shipping networks 56 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Shipping networks 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 57

7 Project guidelines 11 Maritime traffic 29 Rail traffic 37 Shipping networks 59 Rail networks Tables 60 Tab. 1. Regular roll-trailer/kombi trains to/from/within the BSR (October 2012) 64 Tab. 2. Rail terminals in regular intermodal traffic to/from/within the BSR (October 2012) 65 Tab. 3. codes utilized in tables/maps (October 2012) Maps of intermodal operators 66 Green Cargo 66 PCC Intermodal 67 ERS Railways 67 EVR Cargo 67 Cargosped 68 Insjöexpressen 68 TFS Trans 68 European Cargo Logistics 68 Mälarpendeln 69 FESCO 69 TransContainer 69 Hupac Intermodal 70 SCT Transport/Tågfrakt 70 LG (Lithuanian Railways) 70 LHB 70 Maersk Polska 71 Intercontainer 71 LDz Cargo Logistika 71 Vänerexpressen 71 Baltic Rail 72 Polzug Intermodal 72 TX Logistik 72 CFL Multimodal 73 SPEDCONT 73 TM Rail 73 Kombiverkehr 74 CargoNet 74 Svens Logistikpartner 74 CFL cargo Sverige 74 ATC Rail 74 ERONTRANS 77 Annexes

Rail networks Rail networks Photo: Kombiverkehr 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 59

Rail networks Tab. 1. Regular roll-trailer/kombi trains to/from/within the BSR (October 2012) OPERATOR SERVICE CITY RAIL TERMINAL COUNTRY OPERATOR SERVICE CITY RAIL TERMINAL COUNTRY ATC Rail Gdańsk-Poznań Gdańsk DCT PL container Poznań ATC Rail PL ATC Rail Gdańsk-Radomsko Gdańsk DCT PL container Radomsko ATC Rail PL Baltic Rail Gdynia-Sławków-Brzesko Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Sławków Euroterminal PL Brzesko Brzesko CT PL Baltic Rail Brzesko-Sławków- Brzesko Brzesko CT PL Vienna-Koper container Sławków Euroterminal PL Vienna WCT AT Koper Koper Luka/KT SI CargoNet Gothenburg-Oslo Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE kombi Oslo Alnabru NO CargoNet Malmö-Oslo Malmö CargoNet SE kombi Oslo Alnabru NO CargoNet Trelleborg-Oslo Trelleborg Port Trelleborg Rail SE kombi Oslo Alnabru NO Cargosped Gdańsk-Brzesko Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL container Brzesko Brzesko Okocim PL Cargosped Gdynia-Brzesko Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Brzesko Brzesko Okocim PL Cargosped Gdańsk-Gądki Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL container Poznań Cargosped Gądki PL Cargosped Gdańsk-Gliwice Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL container Gliwice Cargosped PL Cargosped Gdynia-Gliwice Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Gliwice Cargosped PL Cargosped Gdańsk-Kobylnica Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL container Kobylnica Cargosped PL Cargosped Gdynia-Kobylnica Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Kobylnica Cargosped PL Cargosped Gdańsk-Kostrzyń Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL container Kostrzyń PL Cargosped Gdynia-Kostrzyń Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Kostrzyń PL Cargosped Gdańsk-Lublin Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL container Lublin PL Cargosped Gdynia-Lublin Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Lublin PL Cargosped Gdańsk-Łódź-Radomsko Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL container Łódź Spedcont Radomsko ATC Rail PL Cargosped Gdynia-Łódź-Radomsko Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Łódź Spedcont PL Radomsko ATC Rail PL Cargosped Gdańsk-Warszawa Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL container Warszawa Cargosped PL Cargosped Gdynia-Warszawa Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Warszawa Cargosped PL Cargosped Warszawa-Hamburg Warszawa Cargosped PL container Hamburg CTT DE Cargosped Gdańsk-Poznań Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL container Poznań ATC Rail PL Cargosped Gdynia-Poznań Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Poznań ATC Rail PL 60 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012 Cargosped Cargosped Gdańsk-Wróblin Głogowski container Gdynia-Wróblin Głogowski container Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL Wróblin PL Głogowski Gdynia BCT, GCT PL Wróblin Głogowski PL Cargosped Gdańsk-Żary Gdańsk GTK, DCT PL container Żary PL Cargosped Gdynia-Żary Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Żary PL Cargosped Szczecin-Wróblin Szczecin DB Port Szczecin PL Głogowski container Wróblin PL Głogowski CFL cargo Sverige Gothenburg-Åhus Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE container Åhus ACT SE CFL Multimodal Lübeck-Bettembourg Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate DE kombi Bettembourg TIB LU ERONTRANS Gdańsk-Kobylnica Gdańsk DCT PL container Kobylnica Cargosped PL ERS Railways Rotterdam-Poznań Rotterdam RSC Rotterdam NL container Poznań CLIP PL European Cargo Logistics Veronashuttle kombi Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate DE Verona Quadrante Europa IT EVR Cargo Tallinn-Moscow Tallinn Muuga EE container Moscow RU FESCO Baltic Transit Klaipėda KCT LT container Almaty KZ Green Cargo Green Cargo Green Cargo Gothenburg-Drammen container Gothenburg-Trelleborg container Gothenburg-Hallsberg container Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Uddevalla Uddevalla Hamnterminal SE Oslo Alnabru NO Drammen RTD NO Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Malmö CargoNet SE Trelleborg Port Trelleborg Rail SE Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Hallsberg Hallsbergs SE Green Cargo Hallsberg-Haparanda Hallsberg Hallsbergs SE container Gävle GCT SE Sundsvall Sundsvall Kombiterminal SE Umeå Umeå Kombiterminal SE Luleå Luleå Kombiterminal SE Haparanda Green Cargo SE Green Cargo Hallsberg-Stockholm Hallsberg Hallsbergs SE container Stockholm Stockholm Årsta SE Green Cargo Hallsberg-Norrköping Hallsberg Hallsbergs SE container Norrköping Pampus SE Green Cargo Norrköping-Stockholm Norrköping Pampus SE container Stockholm Stockholm Årsta SE Green Cargo Stockholm-Gävle Stockholm Stockholm Årsta SE container Gävle GCT SE

Rail networks OPERATOR SERVICE CITY RAIL TERMINAL COUNTRY OPERATOR SERVICE CITY RAIL TERMINAL COUNTRY Green Cargo Stockholm-Trelleborg Stockholm Stockholm Årsta SE container Trelleborg Port Trelleborg Rail SE Hupac Intermodal Copenhagen-Fredericia Copenhagen Høje Taastrup DK container Fredericia Taulov DK Hupac Intermodal Fredericia-Milano Fredericia Taulov DK container Milano Busto Arsizio-Gallarate IT Hupac Intermodal Fredericia-Verona Fredericia Taulov DK container Verona Quadrante Europa IT Hupac Intermodal Fredericia-Malmö Fredericia Taulov DK container Malmö CargoNet SE Hupac Intermodal Lübeck-Novara Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate DE container Novara Eurogateway IT Hupac Intermodal Lübeck-Duisburg Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate DE container Duisburg DIT IT Hupac Intermodal Sławków-Schwarzheide Sławków Euroterminal PL container Schwarzheide BASF DE Hupac Intermodal Sławków-Antwerp Sławków Euroterminal PL container Schwarzheide BASF DE Antwerp Combinant BE Hupac Intermodal Sławków-Ludwigshafen Sławków Euroterminal PL container Schwarzheide BASF DE Ludwigshafen KTL DE Hupac Intermodal Sławków-Duisburg Sławków Euroterminal PL container Schwarzheide BASF DE Duisburg DIT DE Hupac Intermodal Warszawa- Warszawa Cargosped PL Schwarzheide container Kobylnica Cargosped PL Schwarzheide BASF DE Hupac Intermodal Warszawa-Antwerp Warszawa Cargosped PL container Kobylnica Cargosped PL Schwarzheide BASF DE Antwerp Combinant BE Hupac Intermodal Warszawa- Warszawa Cargosped PL Ludwigshafen container Kobylnica Cargosped PL Schwarzheide BASF DE Ludwigshafen KTL DE Hupac Intermodal Warszawa-Duisburg Warszawa Cargosped PL container Kobylnica Cargosped PL Schwarzheide BASF DE Duisburg DIT DE Hupac Intermodal Duisburg-Rotterdam Duisburg DIT DE container Rotterdam RSC Rotterdam NL Hupac Intermodal Duisburg-Köln Duisburg DIT DE container Köln HGK DE Hupac Intermodal Duisburg-Singen Duisburg DIT DE container Singen TSG DE Hupac Intermodal Duisburg-Vienna Duisburg DIT DE container Vienna WCT AT Hupac Intermodal Duisburg-Budapest Duisburg DIT DE container Budapest BILK HU Hupac Intermodal Ludwigshafen-Novara Ludwigshafen KTL DE container Novara Eurogateway IT Hupac Intermodal Ludwigshafen-Milano Ludwigshafen KTL DE container Milano Busto Arsizio-Gallarate IT Hupac Intermodal Ludwigshafen-Antwerp Ludwigshafen KTL DE container Antwerp Combinant BE Hupac Intermodal Ludwigshafen- Ludwigshafen KTL DE Zeebrugge container Zeebrugge C. Ports BE Hupac Intermodal Schwarzheide-Antwerp Schwarzheide BASF DE container Antwerp Combinant BE Hupac Intermodal Schwarzheide- Schwarzheide BASF DE Ludwigshaven container Ludwigshafen KTL DE Hupac Intermodal Schwarzheide-Duisburg Schwarzheide BASF DE container Duisburg DIT DE Hupac Intermodal Schwarzheide- Schwarzheide BASF DE Schkopau container Schkopau Buna DE Insjöexpressen Insjön-Gävle Insjön Insjöterminal SE container Gävle GCT SE Insjöexpressen Intercontainer Intercontainer Intercontainer Intercontainer Intercontainer Gothenburg-Insjön container Gothenburg-Borlänge kombi Gothenburg-Gävle kombi Gothenburg- Helsingborg Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Insjön Insjöterminal SE Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Borlänge Borlänge Combiterminal SE Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Gävle GCT SE Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE kombi Helsingborg Port Helsingborg Rail Gothenburg-Norrköping kombi Gothenburg- Stockholm/Södertälje Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Norrköping Schavemaker Cargo SE Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE kombi Södertälje Port Södertälje Rail SE Intercontainer Gothenburg-Sundsvall Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE kombi Sundsvall Sundsvall Kombiterminal SE Intercontainer Intercontainer Intercontainer Gothenburg-Vaggeryd container Halmstad-Västerås container Gothenburg-Västerås kombi Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Vaggeryd VLC SE Halmstad Port Halmstad Rail SE Västerås Västerås Kombiterminal SE Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Västerås Västerås Kombiterminal SE Kombiverkehr Kiel-Hamburg Kiel KombiPort DE kombi Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE Kombiverkehr Lübeck-Duisburg Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate DE kombi Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE Kombiverkehr Lübeck-Hamburg Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate DE kombi Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE Kombiverkehr Lübeck-Köln Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate DE kombi Köln DUSS Eifeltor DE Kombiverkehr Lübeck-Ludwigshafen Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate DE kombi Ludwigshafen KTL DE Kombiverkehr Lübeck-Basel Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate DE kombi Basel DUSS TBWR DE SE 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 61

Rail networks OPERATOR SERVICE CITY RAIL TERMINAL COUNTRY OPERATOR SERVICE CITY RAIL TERMINAL COUNTRY Kombiverkehr Rostock-Hamburg Rostock Rostock Trimodal DE kombi Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE Kombiverkehr Hamburg-Basel Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE kombi Basel DUSS TBWR DE Kombiverkehr Hamburg-Frankfurt/Main Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE kombi Frankfurt/ DUSS Frankfurt DE Main Kombiverkehr Hamburg-Karlsruhe Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE kombi Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Gbf DE Kombiverkehr Hamburg-Köln Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE kombi Köln DUSS Eifeltor DE Kombiverkehr Hamburg-Ludwigshafen Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE kombi Ludwigshafen KTL DE Kombiverkehr Hamburg-München Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE kombi München DUSS München-Riem DE Kombiverkehr Hamburg-Neuss Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE kombi Neuss Neuss Trimodal DE Kombiverkehr Hamburg-Lovosice Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE kombi Lovosice ČD-DUSS Terminál CZ Kombiverkehr Hamburg-Milano Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE kombi Milano Busto Arsizio Gallarate IT Kombiverkehr Hamburg-Verona Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE kombi Verona Quadrante Europa IT Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Rotterdam Duisburg DeCeTe DE container Rotterdam ECT Delta NL APM s NL Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Basel Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Basel DUSS TBWR DE Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Hamburg Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Leipzig Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Leipzig DUSS Leipzig-Wahren DE Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Ludwigshafen Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Ludwigshafen KTL DE Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Marl Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Marl UTM DE Kombiverkehr Duisburg-München Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi München DUSS München-Riem DE Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Wels Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Wels RoLa AT Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Antwerp Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Antwerp Combinant BE Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Lovosice Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Lovosice ČD-DUSS Terminál, TSC CZ Lovosice Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Lyon Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Lyon Venissieux FR Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Milano Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Milano Busto Arsizio Gallarate IT Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Rotterdam Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Rotterdam RSC Rotterdam NL Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Poznań Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Poznań Polzug Hub PL Kombiverkehr Duisburg-Ljubljana Duisburg DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DE kombi Ljubljana Ljubljana KT SI Kombiverkehr Fredericia-Hamburg Fredericia Taulov DK kombi Hamburg DUSS Billwerder DE Kombiverkehr Herne-Helsingborg Herne Wanne DE kombi Helsingborg Port Helsingborg Rail SE LDz Cargo Logistika Riga-Minsk Riga LV container Minsk Koljadichi BY LG (Lithuanian Vikingas Klaipėda KCT LT Railways) container Odessa CTO UA Ilyichevsk CTI UA LG (Lithuanian Merkurijus Klaipėda KCT LT Railways) container Moscow RU LHB Lübeck-Verona Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate DE kombi Verona Quadrante Europa IT Maersk Polska Maersk Amber Express Gdańsk DCT PL container Kąty Schavemaker PL Wrocławskie Maersk Polska Maersk Baltic Express Gdańsk DCT PL container Sławków Euroterminal PL Mälarpendeln Gothenburg-Avesta Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE container Avesta Mälarpendeln SE Mälarpendeln Mälarpendeln Gothenburg-Hällefors container Gothenburg- Kristinehamn Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Hällefors Mälarpendeln SE Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE container Kristinehamn Mälarpendeln SE Mälarpendeln Gothenburg-Västerås Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE container Västerås Västerås Kombiterminal SE PCC Intermodal Gdańsk-Kutno Gdańsk DCT PL container Kutno PCC PL PCC Intermodal Gdańsk-Kutno-Brzeg Gdańsk DCT PL Dolny container Kutno PCC PL Brzeg Dolny PCC PL PCC Intermodal Gdańsk-Kutno-Gliwice Gdańsk DCT PL container Kutno PCC PL Gliwice PCC DE PCC Intermodal Gdynia-Kutno Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Kutno PCC PL PCC Intermodal Gdynia-Kutno-Brzeg Gdynia BCT, GCT PL Dolny container Kutno PCC PL Brzeg Dolny PCC PL PCC Intermodal Gdynia-Kutno-Gliwice Gdynia BCT, GCT PL container Kutno PCC PL Gliwice PCC PL PCC Intermodal Hamburg-Kutno- Hamburg CTA, CTB, CTT DE Moscow container Frankfurt/Oder PCC DE Kutno PCC PL Moscow Wostoktrans RU PCC Intermodal Hamburg-Brzeg Dolny Hamburg CTA, CTB, CTT DE container Frankfurt/Oder PCC DE Brzeg Dolny PCC PL PCC Intermodal Hamburg-Gliwice Hamburg CTA, CTB, CTT DE container Frankfurt/Oder PCC DE Brzeg Dolny PCC PL Gliwice PCC PL 62 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Rail networks OPERATOR SERVICE CITY RAIL TERMINAL COUNTRY OPERATOR SERVICE CITY RAIL TERMINAL COUNTRY PCC Intermodal Bremerhaven-Kutno- Bremerhaven NTB, Eurogate DE Moscow container Frankfurt/Oder PCC DE Kutno PCC PL Moscow Wostoktrans RU PCC Intermodal Bremerhaven-Brzeg Bremerhaven NTB, Eurogate DE Dolny container Frankfurt/Oder PCC DE Brzeg Dolny PCC PL PCC Intermodal Bremerhaven-Gliwice Bremerhaven NTB, Eurogate DE container Frankfurt/Oder PCC DE Brzeg Dolny PCC PL Gliwice PCC PL PCC Intermodal Rotterdam-Kutno- Rotterdam RSC Rotterdam, Pernis NL Moscow container Duisburg D3T DE Frankfurt/Oder PCC DE Kutno PCC PL Moscow Wostoktrans RU PCC Intermodal Rotterdam-Brzeg Dolny Rotterdam RSC Rotterdam, Pernis NL container Duisburg D3T DE Frankfurt/Oder PCC DE Brzeg Dolny PCC PL PCC Intermodal Rotterdam-Gliwice Rotterdam RSC Rotterdam, Pernis NL container Duisburg D3T DE Frankfurt/Oder PCC DE Gliwice PCC PL Polzug Intermodal Hamburg-Poland Hamburg CTA, CTB, CTT, Eurogate DE container Poznań Polzug Hub PL Gdańsk GTK PL Łódź Spedcont PL Małaszewicze PKP Cargo Logistics PL Warszawa Polzug Pruszków PL Katowice Polzug Dąbrowa PL Górnicza Wrocław Polzug PL Polzug Intermodal Gdańsk-Poznań Gdańsk GTK DE container Poznań Polzug Hub PL Polzug Intermodal Gdynia-Poznań Gdynia BCT DE container Poznań Polzug Hub PL SCT Transport/ Tågfrakt SCT Transport/ Tågfrakt SCT Transport/ Tågfrakt Gothenburg-Eskilstuna Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE container Eskilstuna Eskilstuna Kombiterminal SE Gothenburg-Gävle container Gothenburg-Jönköping container Gothenburg Gävle Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail Granudden Kombiterminal Port Gothenburg Rail Jönköping Jönköping Solåsen SE SPEDCONT Gdańsk-Łódź Gdańsk DCT PL container Łódź Spedcont PL SPEDCONT Gdańsk-Sosnowiec Gdańsk DCT PL container Sosnowiec Spedcont PL SPEDCONT Gdynia-Łódź Gdynia BCT PL container Łódź Spedcont PL SPEDCONT Gdynia-Sosnowiec Gdynia BCT PL container Sosnowiec Spedcont PL SE SE SE Svens Logistikpartner Gothenburg-Flaköping container Gothenburg Falköping Port Gothenburg Rail Falköping Intermodal TFS Trans Riga-Moscow Riga LV container Moscow RU TM Rail TM Rail Gothenburg-Örebro container Gothenburg-Stockholm container Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Örebro Örebro Kombiterminal SE Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Stockholm Stockholm Årsta SE TransContainer Moscow-Riga Moscow RU Riga Baltic Container LV TX Logistik TX Logistik Vänerexpressen Vänerexpressen Trelleborg-Stockholm Årsta Trelleborg Port Trelleborg Rail kombi Malmö Norra Hamnen SE Eskilstuna Eskilstuna Kombiterminal SE Stockholm Stockholm Årsta SE Trelleborg-Umeå kombi Gothenburg-Åmål container Gothenburg-Karlstad container Trelleborg Port Trelleborg Rail SE Umeå Port Trelleborg Rail SE Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Åmål Vänerexpressen SE Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail SE Karlstad Vänerexpressen SE SE SE SE 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 63

Rail networks Tab. 2. Rail terminals in regular intermodal traffic to/from/within the BSR (October 2012) BALTIC SEA COUNTRIES BALTIC SEA COUNTRIES OTHERS DENMARK Copenhagen Høje Taastrup Jönköping Karlstad Jönköping Solåsen Vänerexpressen AUSTRIA Vienna WCT Fredericia Taulov Kristinehamn Mälarpendeln Wels RoLa ESTONIA Tallinn Muuga Luleå Malmö Luleå Kombiterminal CargoNet, Norra Hamnen BELARUS Minsk Koljadichi GERMANY (BALTIC SEA) Kiel KombiPort Norrköping Örebro Pampus, Schavemaker Örebro Kombiterminal BELGIUM Antwerp HTA, Combinant Lübeck Baltic Rail Gate Södertälje Port Södertälje Rail Zeebrugge C. Ports Rostock Rostock Trimodal LATVIA Riga BCT LITHUANIA Klaipėda KCT POLAND Brzeg Dolny PCC Brzesko Brzesko CT, Brzesko Okocim Gdańsk DCT, GTK Gdynia BCT, GCT Gliwice Cargosped, PCC Katowice Polzug Dąbrowa Górnicza Kąty Wrocławskie Schavemaker Kobylnica Cargosped Kostrzyń Kutno PCC Lublin Łódź Spedcont Małaszewicze PKP Cargo Logistics Poznań ATC Rail, Cargosped Gądki, CLIP, Polzug Hub Stockholm Sundsvall Trelleborg Uddevalla Umeå Vaggeryd Västerås Stockholm Årsta Sundsvall Kombiterminal Port Trelleborg Rail Uddevalla Hamnterminal Umeå Kombiterminal VLC Västerås Kombiterminal CZECH REPUBLIC Lovosice ČD-DUSS Terminál, TSC Lovosice FRANCE Lyon Venissieux GERMANY (NORTH SEA + HINTERLAND) Bremerhaven Eurogate, NTB Hamburg Eurogate, CTA, CTB, CTT, DUSS Billwerder Duisburg DeCeTe, DUSS Ruhrort Hafen, D3T, DIT Frankfurt/Oder PCC Frankfurt/Main DUSS Frankfurt Herne Wanne Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Gbf Köln DUSS Eifeltor, HGK Leipzig DUSS Leipzig-Wahren Ludwigshafen KTL Marl UTM München DUSS München-Riem Neuss Neuss Trimodal Schkopau Buna Schwarzheide BASF Radomsko ATC Rail Singen TSG Sławków Sosnowiec Euroterminal Spedcont HUNGARY Budapest BILK Szczecin Warszawa Wrocław DB Port Szczecin Cargosped, Polzug Pruszków Polzug Wróblin Głogowski Żary RUSSIA Moscow Wostoktrans SWEDEN Åhus ACT Åmål Vänerexpressen Avesta Mälarpendeln Borlänge Borlänge Combiterminal Eskilstuna Eskilstuna Kombiterminal Falköping Falköping Intermodal Gävle GCT, Granudden Kombiterminal Gothenburg Port Gothenburg Rail Hällefors Mälarpendeln Hallsberg Hallsbergs Halmstad Port Halmstad Rail Haparanda Green Cargo Helsingborg Port Helsingborg Rail Insjön Insjöterminal ITALY Milano Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Novara Eurogateway Verona Quadrante Europa KAZAKHSTAN Almaty LUXEMBOURG Bettembourg TIB NORWAY Oslo Alnabru Drammen RTD SLOVENIA Koper Koper Luka/KT, Ljubljana KT SWITZERLAND Basel DUSS TBWR THE NETHERLANDS Rotterdam RSC Rotterdam, Pernis, ECT Delta, ECT EMX, APMT UKRAINE Odessa CTO Ilyichevsk CTI 64 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Rail networks Tab. 3. codes utilized in tables/maps (October 2012) TERMINALS CODE TERMINALS CODE TERMINALS CODE Adria Kombi Koper Luka/KT Åhus Container Alnabru Kombiterminal APM s ATC Rail Poznań ATC Rail Radomsko Baltic Container Gdynia Baltic Container Riga Baltic Rail Gate BILK Kombiterminal Borlänge Combiterminal Brzesko Container Brzesko Okocim Buna Container Value Park Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Koper Luka/KT ACT Alnabru APMT ATC Rail ATC Rail BCT BCT Baltic Rail Gate BILK Borlänge Combiterminal Brzesko CT Brzesko Okocim Buna Busto Arsizio- Gallarate C. Ports C. Ports Cargo Rail CargoNet CargoNet Cargosped Gądki Cargosped Gądki Cargosped Gliwice Cargosped Cargosped Kobylnica Cargosped Granudden Kombiterminal Hallsbergs Haparanda Rail Green Cargo HGK Köln Westkai HHLA CT Altenwerder HHLA CT Burchardkai HHLA CT Tollerort Høje Taastrup Kombiterminal Hupac Antwerp Insjöterminal Jönköping Solåsen Kombiterminal Klaipėda Container Kombi- Ludwigshafen KombiPort Kiel Kombiverhekr Karlsruhe Gbf Luleå Kombiterminal Lyon Venissieux Mälarpendeln Małaszewicze PKP Cargo Logistics Minsk Koljadichi Muuga Container Granudden Kombiterminal Hallsbergs Green Cargo HGK CTA CTB CTT Høje Taastrup HTA Insjöterminal Jönköping Solåsen KCT KTL KombiPort Karlsruhe Gbf Luleå Kombiterminal Venissieux Mälarpendeln PKP Cargo Logistics Koljadichi Muuga Stockholm Årsta Kombiterminal Stockholm Tomteboda STR Containerumschlags- BASF Sundsvall Kombiterminal Taulov Kombiterminal PCC Frankfurt/Oder Singen TSG Terminál TSC Lovosice Terminaux Intermodaux Bettembourg Uddevalla Hamnterminal Umeå Kombiterminal Umschlag Marl Vaggeryd Logistic Center Vänerexpressen Vännäs Intermodal Västerås Kombiterminal Verona Quadrante Europa Wanne Westhafen WienCont Container Wostoktrans Stockholm Årsta Tomteboda BASF Sundsvall Kombiterminal Taulov PCC TSG TSC Lovosice TIB Uddevalla Hamnterminal Umeå Kombiterminal UTM VLC Vänerexpressen VIT Västerås Kombiterminal Quadrante Europa Wanne WCT Wostoktrans Cargosped Warszawa Cargosped Neuss Trimodal Neuss Trimodal ČD-DUSS Terminál ČD-DUSS Terminál Norra Hamnen Norra Hamnen CLIP CLIP NTB North Sea Bremerhaven NTB Combined Antwerp Combinant Örebro Kombiterminal Örebro Kombiterminal Container Ilyichevsk CTI Pampus Container Pampus Container Odessa CTO PCC Brzeg Dolny PCC DB Port Szczecin DB Port Szczecin PCC Gliwice PCC DeCeTe Duisburger Container DeCeTe PCC Kutno PCC Deepwater Container Gdańsk DCT Pernis Combi Pernis Duisburg Intermodal Duisburg Trimodal DUSS- Basel-Weil am Rhein DUSS- Duisburg Ruhrort Hafen DUSS- Frankfurt/Main DUSS- Hamburg-Billwerder DUSS- Köln Eifeltor DUSS- Leipzig-Wahren DUSS- München-Riem ECT Delta ECT Euromax Eskilstuna Kombiterminal Eurogate CT Bremerhaven Eurogate CT Hamburg Eurogateway Euroterminal Sławków Falköping Intermodal Gävle Container Gdańsk Container Gdynia Container DIT D3T DUSS TBWR DUSS Ruhrort Hafen DUSS Frankfurt DUSS Billwerder DUSS Eifeltor DUSS Leipzig-Wahren DUSS München-Riem ECT Delta ECT EMX Eskilstuna Kombiterminal Eurogate Eurogate Eurogateway Euroterminal Falköping Intermodal GCT GTK GCT Polzug Container Dąbrowa Górnicza Polzug Container Pruszków Polzug Container Wrocław Polzug Hub Poznań Port Gothenburg Rail Port Halmstad Rail Port Helsingborg Rail Port Södertälje Rail Port Trelleborg Rail Rail Cargo Austria Wels RoLa Rail Service Center Rotterdam Rail Drammen Rostock Trimodal Schavemaker Cargo Spedcont Container Łódź Olechów Spedcont Container Sosnowiec Południowy Polzug Dąbrowa Górnicza Polzug Pruszków Polzug Polzug Hub Port Gothenburg Rail Port Halmstad Rail Port Helsingborg Rail Port Södertälje Rail Port Trelleborg Rail RoLa RSC Rotterdam RTD Rostock Trimodal Schavemaker Spedcont Spedcont 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 65

Rail networks 66 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Rail networks 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 67

Rail networks 68 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Rail networks 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 69

Rail networks 70 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Rail networks 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 71

Rail networks 72 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Rail networks 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 73

Rail networks 74 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Photo: PCC

7 Project guidelines 11 Maritime traffic 29 Rail traffic 37 Shipping networks 59 Rail networks 77 Annexes 78 Annex 1. Baltic feeder/shortsea operators TEU capacity (2012) 79 Annex 2. Baltic feeder/shortsea operators fleets (2012) 83 Annex 3. Baltic feeder/shortsea operators' services vessels (2012) 86 Annex 4. Baltic feeder/shortsea operators distribution of vessels in capacity groups [TEU] (2012) 87 Annex 5. Baltic container ports annual turnover (2011) 88 Annex 6. Baltic container terminals annual turnover (2011)

Annexes Annexes Photo: ADP 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 77

Annexes Annex 1. Baltic feeder/shortsea operators TEU capacity (2012) Operator No. of ships TEU Average TEU GT Average GT DWT APL 3 2,377 792 32,591 10,864 37,264 CMA CGM 14 16,161 1,154 163,429 11,674 203,120 Containerships 8 7,005 876 72,172 9,022 91,700 Delta Shipping Lines 4 3,472 868 39,924 9,981 45,385 Eimskip 3 3,637 1,212 35,762 11,921 42,572 Green Feeder 2 1,016 508 7,998 3,999 10,422 Hacklin Seatrans 1 374 374 2,828 2,828 4,452 Hapag-Lloyd 3 3,757 1,252 41,831 13,944 52,754 K-Line 2 1,387 694 12,382 6,191 15,976 MacAndrews 3 2,114 705 19,703 6,568 23,887 Mann Lines 2 1,316 658 10,123 5,062 13,712 Merilinja 3 1,915 638 16,382 5,461 20,629 MSC 17 32,056 1,886 407,711 23,983 450,854 OOCL 8 8,818 1,102 94,091 11,761 113,124 Samskip 2 1,816 908 17,660 8,830 22,286 SCA Transforest 2 1,834 917 18,289 9,145 22,759 Sea Connect 4 2,793 698 26,743 6,686 32,771 Seago Line 10 15,182 1,518 158,610 19,234 192,338 Swan Container Line 1 1,008 1,008 11,662 11,662 13,711 Team Lines 11 9,621 875 92,512 8,410 101,229 TransAtlantic 7 3,342 477 31,408 4,487 42,548 Tschudi Lines 3 1,766 589 14,899 4,966 19,663 Unifeeder 32 33,321 1,041 355,752 11,117 413,907 X-Press Feeders 3 2,561 864 24,009 8,003 28,103 Total: 148 158,649 1,072 1708,471 11,543 2015,166 Photo: CMP 78 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Annexes Annex 2. Baltic feeder/shortsea operators fleets (2012) Operator Name TEU GT DWT Owner/manager APL Tongan 925 10,956 12,612 ER Shipping Ceres 877 9,983 12,254 Reederei Gebr. Winter National Glory 575 11,652 12,418 National Shipping of America Total: 2,377 32,591 37,284 CMA CGM FESCO Vladimir 1,730 16,803 22,708 FESCO Christopher 1,440 16,003 20,073 Reederi Rudolf Schepers Alsterdijk 1,436 17,368 21,150 Navigia Shipping Amerdijk 1,436 17,368 21,232 Navigia Shipping Charlotta 1,421 14,961 20,140 Hans Peterson Phoenix J 1,300 10,585 13,200 Jungerhans Maritime Services WES Carina 1,300 10,585 13,200 Wessels Reederei Clou Ocean 1,147 10,834 12,258 Carsten Rehder Mito Strait 1,118 9,910 13,760 Carsten Rehder Anna Sirkka 868 9,981 11,271 HH Shipping Jork 868 9,981 11,385 Hans-Uwe Meyer Bereederung Helgaland 864 7,519 8,622 HH Shipping Elbdeich 724 7,532 8,724 Elbdeich Bereederungsges. Marghareta B 508 3,999 5,397 Tesch Bereederungsgeselschaft Total: 16,160 163,429 203,120 Containerships Containerships VI 966 9,953 13,645 Reederei H.-P. Wegener Containerships VII 966 10,499 13,965 Containerships Aila 907 9,131 11,497 Langh Ship Linda 907 9,131 11,487 Langh Ship Containerships VIII 850 9,902 13,174 Reederei H.-P. Wegener Jork Ranger 803 7,852 9,288 Bernd Becker Sleipner 803 7,852 9,322 J. Kahrs Bereederungs Vohburg 803 7,852 9,322 Reederei Kopping Total: 7,005 72,172 91,700 Delta Shipping Lines Andrea 868 9,981 11,285 Bergen Box Carriers Finnlandia 868 9,981 11,424 Hammonia Reederei Hanna 868 9,981 11,408 Gebruder Ahrens Laura Ann 868 9,981 11,368 Eicke Reederei Total: 3,472 39,924 45,485 Eimskip Dettifoss 1,465 14,664 17,034 Eimskip Godafoss 1,465 14,664 17,042 Eimskip Tetuan 707 6,434 8,496 ER Shipping Total: 3,637 35,762 42,572 Green Feeder Dornbusch 508 3,999 5,220 Reederei Jurgen Ohle Nor Feeder 508 3,999 5,202 Sandfrakt Rederi Total: 1,016 7,998 10,422 Hacklin Seatrans Klenoden 374 3,828 4,452 Bore Hapag-Lloyd Emotion 1,440 15,924 20,082 JR Shipping Empire 1,440 15,924 20,316 JR Shipping Carat 877 9,983 12,356 Reederei Gebr. Winter Total: 3,757 41,831 52,754 K-Line Conmar Fjord 680 6,191 7,979 Conmar Shipping 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 79

Annexes Operator Name TEU GT DWT Owner/manager Conmar Hawk 707 6,191 7,997 Conmar Shipping Total: 1,387 12,382 15,976 MacAndrews Henrike Scheppers 803 7,852 9,231 HS Shipping Jork Ruler 803 7,852 9,331 Bernd Becker Maris 508 3,999 5,325 Heinz Moje Total: 2,114 19,703 23,887 Mann Lines Anke Ehler 658 5,067 6,850 Reederei Heinz Ehler Lappland 658 5,056 6,862 HH Shipping Total: 1,316 10,123 13,712 Merilinja Merwedijk 707 6,420 8,298 Johanna 700 6,363 7,131 BF Victoria 508 3,999 5,200 Total: 1,915 16,782 20,629 MSC Conti Sharjah 3,469 42,323 44,510 Conti Reederi Conti Singa 3,469 42,336 44,510 Conti Reederi MSC Atlantic 3,005 37,071 46,975 MSC Arelia 2,714 32,161 38,700 Peter Dohle Athens Trader 2,386 29,195 35,534 Conmar Shipping MSC Joy 1,939 30,567 31,160 MSC Fesco Voronezh 1,730 16,803 23,063 FESCO MSC Eyra 1,438 21,586 21,370 MSC MSC Hina 1,438 21,586 21,370 MSC MSC Iris 1,438 21,586 21,370 MSC MSC Lieselotte 1,438 21,586 21,370 MSC MSC Malin 1,438 21,586 21,370 MSC Langeness 1,402 15,633 17,002 Briese Schiffahrts Norderoog 1,402 15,633 16,921 Briese Schiffahrts MSC Jilhan 1,304 14,068 19,705 MSC Sandy Rickmers 1,216 14,290 14,901 Rickmers Shipmanagement Hanse Courage 830 9,701 11,023 Johs. Thode Total: 32,056 407,711 450,854 OOCL OOCL Novgorod 1,440 16,023 20,069 Indigo Dolphin Shipping OOCL Rauma 1,425 17,488 17,892 JR Shipping Conmar Bay 1,036 10,585 13,200 Conmar Shipping Grete Sibum 1,036 10,585 13,172 Reederei Bernd Sibum Nordic Philip 1,036 10,318 13,031 Nordic Hamburg Shipping Nordic Stani 1,036 10,318 13,200 Nordic Hamburg Shipping OOCL St. Petersburg 1,008 11,662 13,740 JR Shipping Iduna 801 7,112 8,820 Unitas Total: 8,818 94,091 113,124 Samskip Arnafell 908 8,830 11,143 Samskip Helgafell 908 8,830 11,143 Samskip Total: 1,816 17,660 22,286 SCA Transforest Stefan Sibum 1,036 10,585 9,587 Reederei Bernd Sibum Flintercape 798 7,702 13,172 Flintercape Shipping Total: 1,834 18,287 22,759 Sea Connect Hanse Vision 801 7,713 9,604 Johs. Thode 80 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Annexes Operator Name TEU GT DWT Owner/manager Borussia Dortmund 700 6,378 7,220 Reederi Rudolf Schepers Njord 646 6,326 8,001 Visser BV Pirita 646 6,326 7,946 Amisco AS Total: 2,793 26,743 32,771 Seago Line Helle Ritscher 1,856 17,360 22,254 Transeste Schiffahrts Maersk Venice 1,719 17,189 22,308 Maersk Maersk Vigo 1,719 17,189 22,200 Maersk Rijnborg 1,712 16,523 16,450 Wagenborg Shipping Maersk Valletta 1,683 17,189 22,300 Maersk Maersk Vancouver 1,683 17,189 22,308 Maersk Suderoog 1,402 15,633 16,939 Briese Schiffahrts Balkan 1,304 15,633 17,004 Komrowski Maersk Arkansas 1,068 14,120 17,375 Maersk WES Gesa 1,036 10,585 13,200 Wessels Reederei Total: 15,182 158,610 192,338 Swan Container Line Baltic Swan 1,008 11,662 13,711 Peter Dohle Team Lines Barmbek 1,638 16,324 15,955 RHL Hamburger Lloyd Reinbek 1,638 16,324 15,952 RHL Hamburger Lloyd Euro Discovery 907 8,032 9,002 Global Hanseatic Shipping Tina 822 7,519 8,709 Holwerda Shipmanagement Conmar Gulf 698 7,545 8,146 Conmar Shipping Ice Crystal 698 7,545 8,248 Bockstiegel Reederei Ice Runner 698 7,545 8,138 Bockstiegel Reederei WMS Groningen 698 7,545 8,173 Navigia Shipping Elisabeth 658 5,067 6,842 Holwerda Shipmanagement Freya 658 5,067 6,850 Holwerda Shipmanagement Atlantic Comet 508 3,999 5,214 Oost Atlantic Lijn Total: 9,621 92,512 101,229 TransAtlantic Transanund 809 7,720 9,527 Astromare Bereederungs Transjorund 809 7,720 9,544 Astromare Bereederungs Conger 508 3,999 5,207 USC Barnkrug Trans Agila 304 2,997 4,550 Speck Reederei Trans Frej 304 2,997 4,470 Speck Reederei Trans Odin 304 2,997 4,530 Speck Reederei Trans Alrek 304 2,978 4,720 Speck Reederei Total: 3,342 31,408 42,548 Tschudi Lines Pachuca 750 6,901 9,236 Herren & Partner Gerda 508 3,999 5,212 Reederei Rambow Ragna 508 3,999 5,215 Reederei Jurgen Ohle Total: 1,766 14,899 19,663 Unifeeder Eilbek 1,638 16,324 15,952 RHL Reederei Flottbek 1,638 16,324 15,933 RHL Reederei Heinrich Ehler 1,425 17,448 17,819 Reederei Ehler Navi Baltic 1,425 17,488 17,894 Amisco AS Thetis D 1,425 17,488 17,882 Reederei Drevin Vera Rambow 1,425 17,488 17,888 Reederei Rambow Alexander B 1,223 14,072 18,530 TS-Shipping Frederik 1,223 14,072 18,458 Reederei Rudolf Schepers DS Agility 1,098 9,940 13,856 DS Schiffahrt 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 81

Annexes Operator Name TEU GT DWT Owner/manager Anne Sibum 1,036 10,585 13,172 Reederei Bernd Sibum Hercules J 1,036 10,585 13,200 Jungerhans Maritime Services Nordic Hamburg 1,036 10,585 13,031 Nordic Hamburg Shipping WES Amelie 1,036 10,585 13,200 Wessels Reederei Ida Rambow 1,008 11,662 13,740 Reederei Rambow Herm Kiepe 977 9,991 13,059 Schepers Bereederung Aldebaran J 974 8,273 10,977 Jungerhans Maritime Services Iris Bolten 974 8,273 11,051 Aug. Bolten Spica J 974 8,246 11,186 Jungerhans Maritime Services Pictor J 925 10,965 12,640 Jungerhans Maritime Services Morsum 889 9,983 12,400 Reederei Eckhoff Anabella 868 9,981 11,273 Peter Dohle Schiffahrts Aurora 868 9,981 11,386 Reederei Rudolf Schepers Bianca Rambow 868 9,981 11,286 Rambow Reederei Bjorg 868 9,981 11,386 Vaage Ship Management Henneke Rambow 868 9,981 11,274 Reederei Rambow Neuenfelde 868 9,981 11,390 Bartels Reederei Robert 868 9,981 11,257 Reederei H-G Voge Fenja 822 7,519 8,658 Holwerda Shipmanagement Francop 822 7,519 8,622 Bartels Reederei Hanse Spirit 809 7,713 9,655 Johs. Thode Marstan 707 6,368 8,627 Unitas Shipmanagement Carolina 700 6,362 7,225 Nordenhamer Bereederungs Total: 33,321 355,725 413,907 X-Press Feeders Helsinki 917 8,971 10,750 Vega-Reederei India 822 7,519 8,732 Danz und Tietjens Schiffartsgroup Oland 822 7,519 8,621 Danz und Tietjens Schiffartsgroup Total: 2,561 24,009 28,103 Photo: Port of Rauma 82 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Annexes Annex 3. Baltic feeder/shortsea operators' services vessels (2012) Operator Service Vessel TEU APL Germany Tallinn Express National Glory 575 APL Russia Express Tongan 925 Ceres 877 CMA CGM Baltic Feeder (loop 1) Charlotta 1,421 CMA CGM Baltic Feeder (loop 2) Charlotta 1,421 CMA CGM Danbot Feeder Elbdeich 724 CMA CGM FEMEX Scandinavian Shuttle Mito Strait 1,118 CMA CGM Gdańsk Riga Feeder Clou Ocean 1,147 CMA CGM Kaliningrad Feeder Jork 868 Anna Sirkka 868 CMA CGM Klaipėda Feeder Helgaland 864 CMA CGM Norway Feeder Marghareta B 508 CMA CGM St. Petersburg Shuttle Service A Alsterdijk 1,436 Amerdijk 1,436 CMA CGM St. Petersburg Shuttle Service B Phoenix J 1,300 WES Carina 1,300 CMA CGM St. Petersburg Shuttle Service C FESCO Vladimir 1,730 Christopher 1,440 Containerships Loops 1-6 Containerships VI 966 Containerships VII 966 Aila 907 Linda 907 Containerships VIII 850 Jork Ranger 803 Sleipner 803 Vohburg 803 Delta Shipping Lines Loop 1 Finnlandia 868 Hanna 868 Delta Shipping Lines Loop 2 Andrea 868 Laura Ann 868 Eimskip Eastern Route Tetuan 707 Eimskip Northern Route Dettifoss 1,465 Godafoss 1,465 Green Feeder Service 1 Dornbusch 508 Green Feeder Service 2 Nor Feeder 508 Hacklin Seatrans Pori-Hamburg Klenoden 374 Hapag-Lloyd Russia Express Service Emotion 1,440 Empire 1,440 Hapag-Lloyd Baltic Feeder Carat 877 K-Line IBESCO-A Conmar Fjord 680 Conmar Hawk 707 MacAndrews UK-Poland Maris 508 MacAndrews Scan Baltic Service Henrike Scheppers 803 Jork Ruler 803 Mann Lines Service 1 Anke Ehler 658 Mann Lines Service 2 Lappland 658 Merilinja Kokkola Antwerp Merwedijk 707 Johanna 700 BF Victoria 508 MSC Loop 1 MSC Atlantic 3,005 Arelia 2,714 MSC Jilhan 1,304 MSC Loop 2 MSC Eyra 1,438 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 83

Annexes Operator Service Vessel TEU MSC Malin 1,438 MSC Loop 3 Norderoog 1,402 Hanse Courage 830 MSC Loop 4 Conti Sharjah 3,469 Conti Singa 3,469 MSC Loop 5 Athens Trader 2,386 MSC Loop 7 MSC Joy 1,939 Fesco Voronezh 1,730 MSC Loop 8 Langeness 1,402 MSC Lieselotte 1,438 MSC Loop 9 Sandy Rickmers 1,216 MSC Loop 10 MSC Hina 1,438 MSC Iris 1,438 OOCL Germany Lithuania Express Iduna 801 OOCL Scan Baltic Express 1 (SBX1) Grete Sibum 1,036 Nordic Philip 1,036 Nordic Stani 1,036 OOCL Scan Baltic Express 2 (SBX2) OOCL Novgorod 1,440 OOCL Rauma 1,425 OOCL Scan Baltic Express 3 (SBX3) Conmar Bay 1,036 OOCL St. Petersburg 1,008 Samskip Iceland-Aarhus Arnafell 908 Helgafell 908 SCA Transforest N. Sweden-Rotterdam Stefan Sibum 1,036 Flintercape 798 Sea Connect Rotterdam-Baltics-St. Petersburg Hanse Vision 801 Borussia Dortmund 700 Sea Connect Rotterdam-Hamburg-St. Petersburg Njord 646 Pirita 646 Seago Line 1 Gdańsk Finnish Gulf Service Maersk Valletta 1,683 Seago Line Gdańsk Baltic Service Suderoog 1,402 Seago Line Gdańsk Kaliningrad Service Balkan 1,304 Seago Line Gdańsk St. Petersburg Service Maersk Vigo 1,719 Seago Line Russia Express Service Maersk Venice 1,719 Maersk Vancouver 1,683 Seago Line Riga Service Maersk Arkansas 1,068 Seago Line Scandinavian Service WES Gesa 1,036 Seago Line St. Petersburg Rauma Service Helle Ritscher 1,856 Rijnborg 1,712 Swan Container Line Rotterdam-St. Petersburg Baltic Swan 1,008 Team Lines DSW 1/ FIN 1/ RUS 1 2 Conmar Gulf 698 Ice Crystal 698 Ice Runner 698 WMS Groningen 698 Team Lines FIN 2/RUS 2/POL 3 2 Barmbek 1,638 Reinbek 1,638 Team Lines NOR 1 Tina 822 Team Lines NOR 2 Elisabeth 658 Team Lines POL 1 Euro Discovery 907 Team Lines SWE 1 Freya 658 TransAtlantic Trans Feeder Line North Transanund 809 Transjorund 809 TransAtlantic Trans Feeder Line South (loop 1) Conger 508 TransAtlantic Trans Feeder Line South (loop 2) Trans Alrek 304 TransAtlantic Trans Pal Line Trans Agila 304 Trans Frej 304 84 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Annexes Operator Service Vessel TEU Trans Odin 304 Tschudi Lines Baltic Services Gerda 508 Ragna 508 Tschudi Lines North Sea Service Pachuca 750 Unifeeder Baltic States Service 2 Ida Rambow 1,008 Unifeeder Baltic States Service 3 Thetis D 1,425 Unifeeder Baltic States Service 4 Aldebaran J 974 Unifeeder Danish Service Bjorg 868 Unifeeder Finnish Service 1 Pictor J 925 Unifeeder Finnish Service 2 Herm Kiepe 977 WES Amelie 1,036 Unifeeder Finnish Service 4 Hercules J 1,036 Vera Rambow 1,425 Heinrich Ehler 1,425 Unifeeder Norway Service 2 Bianca Rambow 868 Unifeeder Norway Service 4 Hanse Spirit 809 Unifeeder Polish Service 1 Marstan 707 Unifeeder Polish Service 2 Francop 822 Unifeeder Polish Service 3 Fenja 822 Unifeeder Poland-Russia Service Carolina 700 Unifeeder Russia Service 1 Eilbek 1,638 DS Agility 1,098 Unifeeder Russia Service 2 Flottbek 1,638 Navi Baltic 1,425 Unifeeder Russia Service 3 Alexander B 1,223 Nordic Hamburg 1,036 Unifeeder Russia Service 4 Frederik 1,223 Anne Sibum 1,036 Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 1 Robert 868 Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 2 Henneke Rambow 868 Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 3 Neuenfelde 868 Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 4 Anabella 974 Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 5 Aurora 868 Unifeeder Scandinavian Service 6 Iris Bolten 974 Morsum 974 X-Press Feeders Aalborg Gothenburg X-Press Helsinki 917 X-Press Feeders Bilbao Gothenburg X-Press India 822 Oland 822 Remarks: 1 Maersk Line's vessels, now operated by Seago Line 2 Vessels in constant rotation between the services 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 85

Annexes Annex 4. Baltic feeder/shortsea operators distribution of vessels in capacity groups [TEU] (2012) Operator 1800+ 1600-1800 1400-1600 1200-1400 1000-1200 800-1000 510-800 Less than 510 MSC 6 1 7 2 1 Seago Line 1 5 1 1 2 Unifeeder 2 4 2 6 16 2 Team Lines 2 2 6 1 CMA CGM 1 4 2 1 4 1 1 OOCL 2 5 1 Hapag Lloyd 2 1 Eimskip 2 1 SCA Transforest 1 1 Swan Container Line 1 Containerships 8 Delta Shipping Lines 4 X Press Feeder 3 APL 2 1 TransAtlantic 2 5 MacAndrews 2 1 Samskip 2 SeaConnect 1 3 Merilinja 2 1 K Line 2 Mann Lines 2 Tschudi Lines 1 2 Green Feeder 2 Hacklin Seatrans 1 Total 7 11 22 7 16 49 22 14 Photo: Maersk 86 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Annexes Annex 5. Baltic container ports annual turnover (2011) No. Country Port Turnover [TEU] Yoy change (%) 1 RU St. Petersburg 2,365,174 +22 2 SE Gothenburg 913,886 +3 3 PL Gdańsk 685,643 +33 4 PL Gdynia 616,441 +27 5 FI HaminaKotka 612,174 +19 6 DK Aarhus 431,000-3 7 FI Helsinki 393,773-2 8 LT Klaipėda 382,185 +30 9 RU Kaliningrad 317,764 +38 10 LV Riga 302,973 +19 11 FI Rauma 218,280 +35 12 EE Tallinn 197,717 +30 13 SE Helsingborg 174,525 +17 14 DK/SE CMP (Copenhagen-Malmö) 171,300 +6 15 SE Gävle 118,883 +18 16 DE Lübeck 117,000-7 17 DK Aalborg 108,652 +70 18 FI Hanko 64,285 +28 19 DK ADP (Fredericia) 63,000 +13 20 PL Szczecin-Świnoujście 54,985-3 21 SE Södertälje 52,815 +39 22 SE Norrköping 44,570 +21 23 DK Esbjerg 38,000 +6 24 FI Oulu 32,290 +4 25 SE Stockholm 28,432 +29 26 DE Kiel 28,021 +8 27 SE Halmstad 25,261-8 28 SE Mälarhamnar 24,697 +15 29 SE Åhus 22,131-6 30 FI Pori 20,895-7 31 SE Umeå 19,687 +12 32 SE Sundsvall 19,231 +125 33 SE Oxelösund 18,360 +66 34 FI Kokkola 18,034 +48 35 FI Tornio 17,734 +24 36 FI Turku 12,094-12 37 SE Iggesund 10,109 +28 38 SE Varberg 9,075 +14 39 SE Wallhamn 8,950-12 40 FI Raahe 4,175-19 41 FI Kemi 4,160-9 42 LV Liepāja 2,964 +65 43 RU Ust-Luga 2,000 44 FI Pietarsaari 634-38 45 SE Piteå 478-42 46 SE Karlskrona 328-21 47 DE Rostock 311-82 48 DE Sassnitz 197 +101 49 SE Uddevalla 122-10 50 FI Eckerö 11 51 SE Hargshamn 7-98 52 FI Vaasa 1-50 Total 8,775,419 2012 Baltic Container Yearbook 87

Annexes Annex 6. Baltic container terminals annual turnover (2011) No. Port Turnover [thou. TEU] Yoy change (%) 1 First Container St. Petersburg 1.174 +1 2 APM s Gothenburg Gothenburg 914 +3 3 Petrolesport St. Petersburg 635 +44 4 Deepwater Container Gdańsk 635 +41 5 Kotka HaminaKotka 494 +24 6 APM s-cargo Service Aarhus 431-3 7 Vuosaari Helsinki 394-2 8 Baltic Container Gdynia Gdynia 362 +29 9 Baltic Container Riga Riga 253 +16 10 Gdynia Container Gdynia 246 +24 11 Moby Dik St. Petersburg 227 +61 12 Klaipėda Container Klaipėda 224 +23 13 Rauma Stevedoring Rauma 218 +35 14 Muuga Container Tallinn 198 +30 15 Vesthamnen Container Helsingborg 175 +17 16 Baltijsk Container Kaliningrad 162-4 17 Klaipėdos Smeltė Klaipėda 158 +40 18 Kaliningrad Sea Commercial Port Kaliningrad 156 +152 19 Copenhagen Container CMP (Copenhagen) 141 +7 20 Hamina HaminaKotka 119 +3 21 Gävle Container Gävle 119 +18 22 Aalborg Container Aalborg 109 +70 23 Container Saint Petersburg St. Petersburg 95 N/a 24 Fredericia Container ADP (Fredericia) 63 +13 25 Rusmarine Forwarding St. Petersburg 60 N/a 26 DB Port Szczecin Szczecin-Świnoujście 55-3 27 Sydhamnen Södertälje 53 +39 28 Gdańsk Container Gdańsk 50-29 29 Pampus Container Norrköping 45 +21 30 Esbjerg Container Esbjerg 38 +6 31 Riga Container Riga 34 N/a 32 Oritkari Oulu 32 +4 33 Neva Metall St. Petersburg 30 N/a 34 Northern Harbour CMP (Malmö) 30 +6 35 Container Frihamnen Stockholm 28 +29 36 Kattegat Halmstad 25-8 37 Västra Hamnen Mälarhamnar (Västeras) 25 +15 38 Åhus Container Åhus 22-6 39 Hacklin Pori 21-7 40 Holmsund Umeå 20 +12 41 Interforest Sundsvall 19 +125 42 Stalhamnen Oxelösund 18 +66 43 All Weather Kokkola 18 +48 44 Röyttä Tornio 18 +24 45 Riga Universal Riga 17 N/a 46 Finnsteve Turku 12-12 47 Varberg Container Varberg 9 +14 48 Ajos Kemi 4-9 49 Ust-Luga Container Ust-Luga <1 88 Baltic Container Yearbook 2012

Photo: Maersk