Key Findings of 2012 ATRS Global Airport Performance Benchmarking project

Similar documents
Key Findings. Chunyan Yu Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) ww.atrsworld.org

Key Findings. Chunyan Yu Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) ww.atrsworld.org

Key Findings of 2011 ATRS Global Airport Performance Benchmarking project

ATRS Global Airport Benchmarking Report 2003

ATRS Global Airport Performance Benchmarking Report, 2003

Privatization, Commercialization, Ownership Forms and their Effects on Airport Performance

Key Results of the ATRS Global Airport Benchmarking

Key Results of the ATRS Global Airport Benchmarking

Prof. Tae H. Oum The Air Transport Research Society (ATRS)

ACI 2008 WORLDWIDE AIRPORT TRAFFIC STATISTICS

INFORMATION PACKAGE Airport Benchmarking Team. Airport Benchmarking Report. Global Standards for Airport Excellence. Project Coordinator:

Rankings of Major U.S. Airports. Total Passengers 2016

INFORMATION PACKAGE Airport Benchmarking Team. Airport Benchmarking Report. Global Standards for Airport Excellence

Supportable Capacity

ACI-NA 2014 (FY13) Benchmarking Survey September 7, 2014

Rankings of Major U.S. Airports. Total Passengers 2017

Airports Council International

The Airport Credit Outlook

ACI-NA 2014 (FY13) Benchmarking Survey September 7, 2014

Project Coordinator: Research Director: North America: Asia Pacific: (Australia) (Australia) (Japan) (Korea) (japan) (Australia) Europe: (Israel)

Global Airport On-time Departure Performance Report September 2014

Project Coordinator: Research Director: North America: Asia Pacific: (Australia) (Australia) (Japan) (Korea) (japan) (Australia) Europe: (Israel)

Preliminary World Airport Traffic 2010 Passenger traffic up 6.3%; Cargo up 15.2%

Air Carrier Update II Lufthansa Group

John Gulding Manager, Strategic Analysis and Benchmarking, FAA. Hartmut Koelman Senior Expert, Performance review Unit, EUROCONTROL

79006 AIR TRAVEL SERVICES 2001 AWARD

Passengers Boarded At The Top 50 U. S. Airports ( Updated April 2

World Class Airport For A World Class City

World Class Airport For A World Class City

Project Coordinator: Research Director: North America: (United States of America) Asia Pacific: (Japan) Hankuk Aviation University.

World Class Airport For A World Class City

Gateway Travel Program

World Class Airport For A World Class City

Transportation Research Forum

Kansas City Aviation Department. Update to Airport Committee January 26, 2017

Associates 2009 Rental Car Satisfaction Study SM (Page 1 of 2)

Airline Network Structures Dr. Peter Belobaba

Industry Update ACI-NA Board of Directors Meeting

busiest routes Key facts behind the world s 20 busiest routes

Travel Report Volume 20, Number 2 July 2011

Megahubs International Index

Global Low Fare Search Comparison Summary Europe, Middle East, and Africa. September 2008

Air Service and Airline Economics in 2018 Growing, Competing and Reinvesting

ATH Athens Greece. BOD Bordeaux France BOG Bogota Colombia

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS IN AVIATION BUSINESS & REGIONAL LANDSCAPE. February Altan Büyükyılmaz, Turkish Technic, Executive VP Commerce

Preliminary World Airport Traffic 2008 Passenger traffic growth flat; Cargo down by 3.6 percent

Preliminary World Airport Traffic 2011 Passenger traffic up 4.9%; Cargo flat -0.1%

Published: Nov Megahubs Index. The World s Most Connected Airports. oag.com OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved

PFC Collection Analysis

Preliminary World Airport Traffic 2009

Aviation Gridlock: Airport Capacity Infrastructure How Do We Expand Airfields?

2012 Airfares CA Out-of-State City Pairs -

Data Communications Program

TravelWise Travel wisely. Travel safely.

A note on the network performance of Dubai and Emirates. Dr Guillaume Burghouwt

SEPTEMBER 2014 BOARD INFORMATION PACKAGE

Place image here (10 x 3.5 ) FAA NEXTGEN DATA COMM TOWER SERVICE: CPDLC DCL NEW OPERATOR INTRODUCTION HARRIS.COM #HARRISCORP

2016 Air Service Updates

J.D. Power and Associates Reports: Customer Satisfaction with Airports Declines Sharply Amid an Industry Fraught with Flight Delays

2016 Air Service Updates

2012 Air Service Data & Planning Seminar

Data Session U.S.: T-100 and O&D Survey Data. Presented by: Tom Reich

2016 Air Service Updates

North America s Fastest Growing Airports 2018

Selected highlights: The burgeoning Pacific market

Beyond Measure jdpower.com North America Airport Satisfaction Study

Megahubs International Index 2018

Emerging US Airport Traffic Trends & Preview To The 2018

Ocean Stopover Cities by Itinerary

CONCESSIONS FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES

Station Capability List

Travel Report Volume 19, Number 2 July 2010

Growing Size and Complexity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Kansas City Aviation Department. Update to Airport Committee October 20, 2016

2016 Air Service Updates

2014 ACI-NA Concessions Benchmarking Survey. Summary Results

Questions regarding the Incentive Program should be directed to Sara Meess at or by phone at

A Decade of Consolidation in Retrospect

CANSO Workshop on Operational Performance. LATCAR, 2016 John Gulding Manager, ATO Performance Analysis Federal Aviation Administration

What Does the Future Hold for Regional Aviation?

Update to Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport

take-off essential metrics on the world s major airlines

5 th Airline Marketing Workshop. Zoom in 2004 Zoom out 2005

Airport Characteristics: Part 2 Prof. Amedeo Odoni

2017 ACI-NA CONCESSIONS BENCHMARKING SURVEY. Summary Results February 2018

ENGINEERING AIRSIDE EXCELLENCE SINCE 1997

The Need and Urgency for a Three-Runway System (3RS) August 7, 2014

Airports Council International, Geneva, Switzerland Airports Council International, European Region, Brussels

2008 Annual General Meeting. YYC & YBW Airports in Motion

Temporal Deviations from Flight Plans:

Airport Characteristics. Airport Characteristics

Escape the Conventional. Air Access Report January 2014 to March 2014

Travel Report Volume 19, Number 4 January 2011

Operational Performance Workgroup. John Gulding Manager, Strategic Analysis and Benchmarking, ATO Office of Performance Analysis, FAA

PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ANALYSIS OF SCHEDULED AIRLINE TRAFFIC. October 2016

European Idle Network Capacity An Assessment of Capacity, Demand and Delay at 33 congested Airports

2015 ACI-NA Concessions Benchmarking Survey. Summary Results

Sixth Annual Airport Project Delivery Systems Summit. June 9 th, 2011 San Jose, California

Region Chapter STA ZIP Airport Airline Total

US/Europe comparison of ATMrelated operational performance

Transcription:

Key Findings of 2012 ATRS Global Airport Performance Benchmarking project ww.atrsworld.org Prof. Tae Hoon Oum, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Canada Dr. Yapyin Choo, The Air Transport Research Society (ATRS), Prof. Chunyan Yu, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, USA) ATRS Global Airport Benchmarking Task Force Asia Pacific: P. Forsyth, Xiaowen Fu, Yeong-Heok Lee, Yuichiro Yoshida, Japhet Law, Shinya Hanaoka Europe: Nicole Adler, Jaap de Wit, Hans-Martin Niemeier, Eric Pels North America: Tae Oum, Bijan Vasigh, Jia Yan, Chunyan Yu Middle East: Paul Hooper Air Transport Research Society (ATRS)

Outline Objective of the ATRS Benchmarking Study Airports Included and ATRS Database Some Characteristics of Sample Airports Methodology Key Results on Efficiency User Charge Comparisons Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 2

Objective of the Benchmarking Study To provide a comprehensive, unbiased comparison of airport performance focusing on Productivity and Operating/Mgt Efficiency Unit Cost Competitiveness Comparison of User Charge Levels Our study does not treat service quality differentials across airports Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 3

Airports Included in the 2012 Report Canada-US Europe 77 airports 55 airports 16 airport groups Asia Pacific 9 airport groups 35 Asian airports 16 Oceania airports ---------------------------------------------------------- Total 183 airports 25 airport groups Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 4

ATRS Airport Database, 2001-2011 The ATRS Database contains historic information (since FY 2001) in the following geographic regions: Asia Pacific including Oceania; Europe; North America The data in each regions is segregated into: Traffic statistics and composition Airport characteristics (capacity, type of ownership etc) Aeronautical Activities and Revenue Non-Aeronautical Activities and Revenue Labor and other Operating Expenses Financial info on Balance Sheets Visit http://www.atrsworld.org/publications.html for more details. 5

Outline Objective of the ATRS Benchmarking Study Airports Included and ATRS Database Some Characteristics of Sample Airports Methodology Key Results on Efficiency User Charge Comparisons Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 6

PEK H ND H KG DXB CG K SIN BKK CAN PVG SYD KUL ICN NRT SH A DEL BOM SZX MEL TPE MNL BNE G MP KIX AKL XMN SUB MAA PER NG O H AK ADL H KT CH C OOL CMB WLG PEN MFM CNS CNX G UM DRW NAN PNH TSV REP H DY NTL ZQN DUD CEI LH R CDG FRA MAD AMS FCO MUC IST LG W BCN ORY ZRH CPH VIE OSL DUS MXP STN DUB MAN BRU ARN ATH TXL LIS H AM H EL TLV GVA ISG CG N NCE LTN WAW EDI BH X LED LIN BUD NAP H AJ RIX CIA BSL TRN SOF MLA BEG ZAG KEF BTS LUX SZG LJU TLL ATL ORD LAX DFW DEN JFK IAH LAS SFO PH X MIA CLT MCO EWR MSP DTW YYZ SEA PH L BOS LG A IAD BWI FLL SLC H NL DCA MDW SAN YVR TPA PDX YUL YYC STL MCI MEM MKE OAK CLE RDU BNA SMF SNA H OU AUS SJC MSY PIT SAT CVG DAL IND RSW CMH YEG PBI ABQ JAX BDL ANC ONT YOW BUR PVD RNO TUS YH Z OKC YWG SDF RIC ALB YYJ YQB YYT YQR 100,000 Passengers Traffic, FY2010 (in 000 passengers) 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 Asia Pacific Europe North America 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 7

PEK HND HKG DXB CGK SIN BKK CAN PVG SYD LHR CDG FRA MAD AMS FCO MUC IST LGW BCN ATL ORD LAX DFW DEN JFK IAH LAS SFO PHX Passenger Traffic (000)- Top 10 Airports: 2006, 2008, 2010 100,000 90,000 80,000 Asia Pacific Europe North America 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 2006 2008 2010 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 8

PEK CGK SIN BOM MNL AKL MAA PER NAN GUM CMB REP HDY CDG AMS IST CPH DUS GVA TXL LIS EDI BHX CRL BSL BEG MLA LAX LAS CVG YYZ SLC SFO DCA FLL PDX SAN SMF BNA DAL ABQ BUR PVD RSW YOW Aircraft Movements, 2010 ( 000 ATM) 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 Asia Pacific Europe North America 400 300 200 100 0 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 9

Passengers per Aircraft Movements, 200 2010 180 160 140 Asia Pacific Europe North America 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 10

4,500 Air Cargo Traffic, 2010 ( 000 metric tons) 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 Asia Pacific Europe North America 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 11

% Non-Aero Revenue, 2010 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 12 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% SIN OOL TSV HKG AKL CAN DUD PER MEL NAN CMB BNE DEL GMP SYD ICN NGO WLG CHC HAK ZQN NTL GUM NRT PVG PEK ADL CEI BKK HDY HKT CNX MAA XMN SZX DRW KUL KIX PEN CGK FRA BSL CDG ORY OSL NCE HAJ IST DUB AMS TLL CPH CIA FCO BUD ATH TLV VIE TRN LTN ZRH MXP LIN BHX MAN GVA NAP HAM LJU SZG SOF LGW ARN MUC RIX LHR STN EDI ISG LIS BRU MLA CGN DUS TXL BTS BCN MAD WAW HEL BEG JAX OKC TPA RIC BUR PHX YYJ MCI BNA MCO ATL RNO YEG CMH RDU MSP IND YQR DAL SAT FLL PBI SLC TUS MKE YYC DFW YVR YWG RSW SNA CLT ALB SAN YQB SMF AUS ABQ SJC PVD YYT YUL LAS SDF YHZ DCA BOS OAK HNL DTW YOW CVG BDL PDX SFO IAD SEA HOU LAX ONT DEN PIT BWI CLE MSY MDW PHL MIA YYZ IAH ORD EWR LGA STL MEM JFK ANC % Non-Aero Rev Mean North America Europe Asia Pacific

Outline Objective of the ATRS Benchmarking Study Airports Included and ATRS Database Some Characteristics of Sample Airports Methodology Key Results on Efficiency User Charge Comparisons Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 13

Airport Productivity Index Outputs Inputs Aircraft movement Passenger {Cargo tonnes} Non-aeronautical revenue output Labour Other non-capital (soft-cost) input [Runways, terminal size, # of gates] Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 14

Methodology: EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT Variable Factor Productivity (VFP) Index Impossible - Total Factor Productivity (TFP) because of capital input cost accounting problem Unit Operating Cost Competitiveness Index: Combines VFP and Input Price Index We explored Alternative approaches: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Econometric Cost Function Approach including Stochastic Frontier methods Note: Industry acceptance of our report using more advanced/sophisticated methods is one of our major concern 15

Multilateral Aggregation Method This multilateral output (input) index procedure uses the following revenue (cost) shares to aggregate output (inputs). Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 16

ATL RDU RNO CLT PBI BNA MSP JAX LGA SAT TPA SNA MCO MKE FLL Airport Ranking Residual Ranking Comparison of Top 15 Airports 55 50 Residual VFP Ranking Residual DEA Ranking Residual SFA Ranking 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 17

BOS CVG CLE SJC ALB PHL DFW STL ONT LAX ORD BWI PIT MSY MIA Airport Ranking Residual Ranking Comparison of Bottom 15 Airports 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 Residual VFP Ranking Residual SFA Ranking Residual DEA Ranking 20 15 10 5 0 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 18

PDX SAN SLC OAK RIC ABQ SEA HNL EWR IAD LAS MEM MDW DCA IAH JFK IND PHX SMF AUS SDF DEN DTW SFO MCI Airport Ranking Residual Ranking Comparison of Mid-Ranked 15 Airports 55 50 Residual VFP Ranking Residual DEA Ranking Residual SFA Ranking 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 19

Outline Objective of the ATRS Benchmarking Study Airports Included and ATRS Database Some Characteristics of Sample Airports Methodology Key Results on Efficiency User Charge Comparisons Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 20

GMP ICN HKG CAN SIN CGK HAK GUM XMN PEK CNX HKT HDY PVG BKK SZX NRT DEL KUL PEN KIX NGO CMB KAC APII AAI AOT MAHB Gross Variable Factor Productivity (VFP) Asia (HKG=1.0), 2010 1.2 Airports Airport Groups 1 0.8 0.6 Mean Mean 0.4 0.2 0 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 21

Potential Reasons for the Measured Productivity (gross VFP) Differentials Factors Beyond Managerial Control: Airport size (Scale of aggregate output) Average aircraft size using the airport Share of international traffic Share of air cargo traffic Extent of capacity shortage - congestion delay Connecting/transfer ratio [2010 Iceland volcano ash cloud (For European airports)] We compute residual (Net) variable factor productivity (RVFP) measures after removing effects of these Factors Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 22

Gross Variable Factor Productivity vs Residual VFP: Asia (HKG=1.0), 2010 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Gross VFP Residual VFP Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 23

GMP Residual (Net) Variable Factor Productivity: (after removing factors beyond managerial control ) : Asia (HKG=1.0) ICN HKG SIN CAN GUM CGK HAK HDY CNX HKT XMN PEK BKK PVG DEL SZX KUL NRT PEN KIX NGO CMB KAC AAI APII AOT MAHB 1.2 1.0 Gimpo, Incheon, Hong Kong Airports Airport Groups 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Residual VFP Mean Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 24

WLG NTL NAN ADL PER DRW AKL BNE CHC ADG ZQN DUD MEL APAC QAL SYD 1.2 Residual (Net) Variable Factor Productivity Oceania (SYD=1.0) Airport Groups 1 Airports Sydney, Queenstown 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 SYD ZQN DUD MEL DRW AKL BNE CHC PER NTL NAN ADL WLG APAC QAL ADG Residual VFP Mean Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 25

TAV FCO BCN ARN STN DUB MAN LGW ORY MXP VIE MUC LHR FRA DUS ANA ADR Avinor Swedavia BAA DAA ADP MAG AENA Finavia Fraport SEA Berlin AMS MAD IST BRU CDG Schiphol ZRH ATH CPH OSL Residual (Net) Variable Factor Productivity: Europe Passengers > 15 million ( CPH=1.0) 1 0.9 0.8 Airports Copenhagen, Oslo, Zurich Airport Groups 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Residual VFP Mean Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 26

BEG BTS CGN TXL WAW LIN SOF TLL LJU NAP TLV TRN MLA RIX SZG BUD HEL HAM ISG EDI LIS CIA BHX BSL HAJ LTN NCE GVA Net Variable Factor Productivity: Europe Passengers < 15 million ( CPH=1.0) 0.9 0.8 Geneva, Nice, Edinburgh 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Residual VFP Mean Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 27

ATL Net Variable Factor Productivity: N. America Passengers > 15 million (YVR=1.0) CLT MSP YVR MCO TPA PHX FLL SFO HNL SEA LGA SLC BOS JFK MDW EWR PHL DTW SAN LAS DCA IAD IAH DFW BWI ORD MIA LAX DEN 1.4 1.2 Atlanta, Charlotte, Minneapolis/St Paul 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Residual VFP Mean Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 28

YQB SNA PBI YEG YQR TUS MKE DAL PDX YYJ YOW IND YYT PVD RSW ABQ CMH MEM OAK SMF YWG MSY SJC YHZ SAT MCI AUS ALB BUR CVG YUL ANC SDF HOU ONT PIT CLE STL OKC RNO YYC BNA JAX RDU RIC Residual (Net) Variable Factor Productivity: N. America Passengers < 15 million (YVR=1.0) 1.4 1.2 Raleigh-Durham, Richmond, Oklahoma City 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Residual VFP Mean Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 29

Top Efficiency Performers (2012) (based on Net VFP index=operating/management efficiency) Asia Pacific: Asian Airports: Gimpo, Incheon, Hong Kong Oceania Airports: Sydney, Queenstown Europe: Large Airports (> 15 million pax): Copenhagen, Oslo, Zurich Small/Medium Airports (< 15 millions Pax): Geneva, Nice, Edinburgh North America (Canada/US): Large Airports (> 15 million pax): Atlanta, Charlotte, Minneapolis/St Paul Small/Medium Airports (< 15 millions Pax): Raleigh-Durham, Richmond, Oklahoma City Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 30

Effects of Business Strategies Diversification of Revenue Source is Good Airports with larger share of non-aeronautical revenue achieve higher efficiency (Net VFP) Outsourcing improves efficiency Airports contracting out various services to outside operator achieve higher efficiency Outsourcing terminal operations improve efficiency 36

Outline Objective of the ATRS Benchmarking Study Airports Included and ATRS Database Some Characteristics of Sample Airports Methodology Key Results on Efficiency and Costs User Charge Comparisons Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 37

KUL GUM DXB CMB SUB BKK CEI CNX HDY HKT CGK MNL PNH REP BOM DEL MAA CAN HAK PEK PVG SHA SZX XMN TPE DUD MFM ICN GMP HKG ZQN PER SIN NAN WLG AKL NTL TSV OOL NTL-Night SYD NGO NRT DRW KIX HND DUS STN-off peak ARN LTN BRU STN-peak MLA LGW-off-peak FRA BSL-FR sector RIX TRN MUC FCO NAP MXP LUX LIN CIA LIS BSL-CH sector IST VIE HAM GVA KEF EDI MAN-peak MAN-offpeak TXL SOF-offpeak HEL CPH LED NCE CGN SOF-peak ZRH MAD HAJ BUD TLL CDG ORY BCN TLV ATH BEG OSL AMS LHR WAW BHX ZAG LGW-peak BTS LJU SZG DUB CLT ATL RDU SLC FLL RIC BNA MEM SAT PBI TUS JAX PHX MSY SAN TPA MCO PHL ANC IND MCI SDF MIA HOU SNA MSP ABQ ONT SJC LAS ALB IAH OKC RSW RNO SEA OAK YVR AUS PDX MDW IAD DCA BDL CLE YQR DEN CVG DFW YOW PVD DTW HNL YEG SMF PIT CMH BWI LAX YHZ YYC YWG BOS ORD YUL SFO JFK Off Peak JFK Peak YQB STL EWR Off Peak EWR Peak LGA Off Peak LGA Peak YYZ US$ Landing Charges for Boeing 767-400, 2011 (in US$) 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 Asia Pacific Europe North America 1,000 0 Landing Charges for Boeing 767 Mean Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 38

Asia Pacific: Combined Landing and GMP CGK PER ZQN DXB ICN ADL WLG CEI CNX HDY HKT BKK MEL TSV PNH REP NTL OOL DRW US$ SYD BNE BNE-PEAK NRT-1N NRT-1S NRT-2 NGO HND AKL KIX NAN Passenger Charge for Boeing 767, 2011 (in US$) 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 Lowest charges: Kuala Lumpur Low Cost Carrier Terminal, Dunedin (New Zealand) Highest charges: Nadi (Fiji), Kansai 10,000 8,000 NTL-Night CNS 6,000 4,000 2,000 KUL-LCCT DUD TPE HKG BOM DEL MAA GUM SIN-LCCT KUL CMB MNL MFM CAN HAK PEK PVG SHA SZX XMN SIN SUB 0 Combined Landing and Passenger Charges for Boeing 767 Mean Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 39

RIX NAP CIA KEF ARN FCO - T1, T2 TLL BSL-FR sector CGN GVA STN-off peak MAN-peak LTN HEL STN-peak CPH - LCCT FCO OSL BCN BUD - LCC T1 TRN LIN MXP NCE LGW-off-peak CPH IST BSL-CH sector EDI DUS SOF-offpeak MAD HAM HAJ SOF-peak MLA LIS TXL LJU VIE LED BUD BRU BEG - T1 MUC BHX AMS DUB TLV - T1 FRA ATH LGW-peak ZAG SZG BEG WAW ZRH US$ Europe: Combined Landing and Passenger Charge for Boeing 767, 2011 (in US$) 16000 14000 12000 10000 Lowest charges: Riga, Luxembourg Highest charges: London Heathrow, Ben Gurion (Tal Aviv) BTS ORY CDG TLV LHR 8000 6000 4000 LUX MAN-offpeak 2000 0 Combined Landing and Passenger Charges for Boeing 767 Mean Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 40

Cost per Enplanement for Airlines (CPE) CPE = sum of landing fees, terminal arrival fee, rents and utilities, terminal apron charges/tiedowns, and passengers other aeronautical payments to airports divided by enplaned passengers Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 41

BUR DAL ATL SLC MEM MCI PHX TPA JAX SAT MSP BNA MKE FLL MCO RIC OKC RDU DFW SAN SDF RNO TUS CMH PBI LAS ALB RSW HOU CVG AUS BDL DTW ABQ PHL MDW ANC OAK BWI MSY SNA HNL LAX IAH PVD IND SJC SEA SMF PDX DEN CLE DCA ONT BOS ORD IAD SFO STL YYJ YQR YYT YHZ YEG YWG YYC YQB YOW YVR $US LGA MIA PIT EWR YUL JFK YYZ North America: Cost per Enplaned Passenger, 2010 (in US$) 35 30 Canada: Lowest CPE: Victoria, Regina Highest CPE: Toronto, Montreal 25 20 15 United States: Lowest CPE: Bob Hope, Dallas Love Field Highest CPE: New York JFK, Newark Liberty 10 5 0 Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 42

Empirical Studies on Factor Affecting Aeronautical User Charge Evidence of cross-subsidization from non-aeronautical revenue Cost strongly affects the airport charges Airport charges for hub airports are more expensive Airport charges for Southwest airports are cheaper, but not significant for airports dominated by low cost airlines overall Connecting traffic, dominant airline %, and no. of nearby airports negatively relate to airport charges but not significant All ownership variables are not significant. Higher landing charges lead to lower terminal charges and vice versa.

Empirical Results 1 Dependent Variable: ln Aero Rev per ATM Random Effect Fixed Effect Hausman Taylor Panel IV (EC2SLS) ln Aero Rev per ATM Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Non-Aero share -2.7238 ** 0.1083-2.7168 ** 0.1087-2.7233 ** 0.1046-2.8497 ** 0.1178 ln Unit Cost 0.1796 ** 0.0447 0.1198 ** 0.0457 0.1329 ** 0.0438 0.1878 ** 0.0465 Transit -0.0599 0.0747-0.0322 0.0748-0.0269 0.0722-0.0236 0.0809 Dominant -0.0791 * 0.0474-0.0431 0.0475-0.0561 0.0457-0.0482 0.0500 International 0.7669 ** 0.1923 0.4861 ** 0.2111 0.5816 ** 0.1971 0.7437 ** 0.1970 ln Pax 0.4768 ** 0.0534 0.3328 ** 0.0588 0.3581 ** 0.0564 0.4947 ** 0.0567 ln ATM -0.9959 ** 0.0485-0.9817 ** 0.0495-0.9881 ** 0.0480-0.9856 ** 0.0513 ln Cargo 0.0527 ** 0.0173 0.0376 * 0.0196 0.0464 ** 0.0186 0.0529 ** 0.0179 No of nearby airport -0.0393 0.0249-0.0217 0.0424-0.0307 0.0256 D hub 0.3116 ** 0.0890 0.4634 ** 0.1369 0.2573 ** 0.0919 D port 0.1461 0.1075 0.1464 0.1817 0.1447 0.1082 D authority 0.0452 0.0684 0.0093 0.1162 0.0883 0.0709 D lowcost -0.0689 0.0731-0.1002 0.1229-0.0538 0.0745 2003 0.0318 * 0.0178 0.0342 * 0.0171 0.0338 ** 0.0167 2004 0.0284 0.0182 0.0403 ** 0.0177 0.0384 ** 0.0172-0.0007 0.0179 2005 0.0495 ** 0.0188 0.0665 ** 0.0184 0.0641 ** 0.0179 0.0200 0.0184 2006 0.0648 ** 0.0194 0.0829 ** 0.0191 0.0805 ** 0.0185 0.0377 ** 0.0190 2007 0.0960 ** 0.0204 0.1197 ** 0.0202 0.1163 ** 0.0196 0.0693 ** 0.0199 2008 0.1184 ** 0.0211 0.1458 ** 0.0211 0.1415 ** 0.0205 0.0916 ** 0.0204 2009 0.1174 ** 0.0213 0.1390 ** 0.0214 0.1351 ** 0.0207 0.0895 ** 0.0208 2010 0.1215 ** 0.0219 0.1435 ** 0.0221 0.1396 ** 0.0214 0.0904 ** 0.0214 Constant 7.2046 ** 1.1469 10.8179 ** 1.2782 9.8921 ** 1.1976 6.7050 ** 1.2011 Observation 470 470 470 416 R-squared 0.7332 0.8597 -- 0.7481

Empirical Results 2 Dependent Variable: ln Aero Rev per ATM Random Effect Hausman Taylor Panel IV (EC2SLS) ln Aero Rev per ATM Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Non-Aero share -2.7077 ** 0.1079-2.7179 ** 0.1045-2.8301 ** 0.1174 ln Unit Cost 0.1856 ** 0.0445 0.1335 ** 0.0438 0.1953 ** 0.0463 Transit -0.0598 0.0738-0.0237 0.0719-0.0272 0.0796 Dominant -0.0610 0.0479-0.0498 0.0459-0.0309 0.0506 International 0.7513 ** 0.1902 0.5743 ** 0.1964 0.7361 ** 0.1945 ln Pax 0.4831 ** 0.0529 0.3544 ** 0.0563 0.5062 ** 0.0561 ln ATM -0.9987 ** 0.0483-0.9874 ** 0.0479-0.9897 ** 0.0511 ln Cargo 0.0511 ** 0.0171 0.0454 ** 0.0186 0.0511 ** 0.0177 No of nearby airport -0.0304 0.0243-0.0127 0.0415-0.0253 0.0246 D hub 0.2937 ** 0.0836 0.4617 ** 0.1262 0.2328 ** 0.0860 D port 0.1351 0.1033 0.1317 0.1767 0.1412 0.1029 D authority 0.0394 0.0661 0.0011 0.1134 0.0892 0.0677 D southwest -0.2123 ** 0.0821-0.2437 * 0.1423-0.1982 ** 0.0850 2003 0.0313 * 0.0178 0.0337 ** 0.0167 2004 0.0286 0.0182 0.0389 ** 0.0172-0.0005 0.0179 2005 0.0489 ** 0.0188 0.0646 ** 0.0179 0.0193 0.0183 2006 0.0641 ** 0.0194 0.0810 ** 0.0185 0.0366 ** 0.0189 2007 0.0949 ** 0.0203 0.1169 ** 0.0196 0.0676 ** 0.0198 2008 0.1177 ** 0.0210 0.1423 ** 0.0205 0.0902 ** 0.0204 2009 0.1173 ** 0.0212 0.1359 ** 0.0207 0.0888 ** 0.0207 2010 0.1209 ** 0.0218 0.1404 ** 0.0213 0.0893 ** 0.0214 Constant 7.0340 ** 1.1321 9.9275 ** 1.1882 6.4511 ** 1.1845 Observation 470 470 416 R-squared 0.7471 -- 0.7633

Empirical Result Dependent Variable: ln Landing Fee per ATM Random Effect Fixed Effect Hausman Taylor Panel IV (EC2SLS) ln Landing Fee per ATM Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Terminal Share -2.2365 ** 0.0970-2.3469 ** 0.0994-2.3155 ** 0.0954-2.1932 ** 0.1045 Non-Aero share -2.5697 ** 0.1566-2.5436 ** 0.1589-2.5548 ** 0.1528-2.5550 ** 0.1701 ln Unit Cost 0.2470 ** 0.0640 0.1302 ** 0.0665 0.1585 ** 0.0635 0.2844 ** 0.0661 Transit 0.0195 0.1034 0.0889 0.1062 0.0903 0.1021 0.0411 0.1107 Dominant -0.1118 0.0677-0.0553 0.0672-0.0772 0.0651-0.0827 0.0714 International 0.4267 * 0.2616-0.0244 0.3005 0.1375 0.2757 0.4887 * 0.2652 ln Pax 0.4715 ** 0.0752 0.2054 ** 0.0866 0.2590 ** 0.0822 0.4759 ** 0.0789 ln ATM -0.9223 ** 0.0693-0.8740 ** 0.0719-0.8944 ** 0.0695-0.8907 ** 0.0732 ln Cargo 0.0547 ** 0.0234 0.0504 * 0.0279 0.0624 ** 0.0263 0.0573 ** 0.0239 No of nearby airport -0.0434 0.0302-0.0027 0.0500-0.0272 0.0296 D hub 0.3110 ** 0.1075 0.5484 ** 0.1574 0.2499 ** 0.1079 D port 0.1361 0.1274 0.1092 0.2116 0.1364 0.1227 D authority 0.0525 * 0.0820 0.0037 0.1369 0.1088 0.0812 D southwest -0.2387 ** 0.1021-0.2849 * 0.1717-0.2086 ** 0.1022 2003 0.0417 0.0255 0.0459 0.0245 0.0452 * 0.0240 2004 0.0436 * 0.0260 0.0645 * 0.0253 0.0606 ** 0.0247 0.0031 0.0257 2005 0.0595 ** 0.0269 0.0926 ** 0.0265 0.0868 ** 0.0258 0.0179 0.0264 2006 0.0643 ** 0.0279 0.1022 ** 0.0277 0.0955 ** 0.0269 0.0229 0.0274 2007 0.1017 ** 0.0291 0.1492 ** 0.0292 0.1408 ** 0.0284 0.0589 ** 0.0285 2008 0.1120 ** 0.0301 0.1681 ** 0.0305 0.1574 ** 0.0296 0.0697 ** 0.0292 2009 0.0962 ** 0.0302 0.1468 ** 0.0308 0.1356 ** 0.0298 0.0549 * 0.0296 2010 0.1203 ** 0.0309 0.1723 ** 0.0317 0.1608 ** 0.0306 0.0802 ** 0.0303 Constant 5.2731 ** 1.6139 11.4374 ** 1.8758 9.7969 ** 1.7269 4.0847 ** 1.6678 Observation 463 463 463 410 R-squared 0.7149 0.7865 -- 0.7359

Empirical Result Dependent Variable: ln Terminal Fee per Pax Random Effect Fixed Effect Hausman Taylor Panel IV (EC2SLS) ln Terminal Fee per Pax Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Coef. Std. Err. Land Share -2.1585 ** 0.0925-2.0639 ** 0.0945-2.0905 ** 0.0907-2.1812 ** 0.1007 Non-Aero share -2.5415 ** 0.1492-2.5094 ** 0.1510-2.5226 ** 0.1454-2.5640 ** 0.1638 ln Unit Cost 0.2303 ** 0.0611 0.1173 * 0.0632 0.1453 ** 0.0605 0.2540 ** 0.0637 Transit 0.0314 0.0987 0.0899 0.1010 0.0936 0.0971 0.0580 0.1066 Dominant -0.0978 0.0644-0.0451 0.0639-0.0655 0.0619-0.0790 0.0687 International 0.5059 ** 0.2506 0.0731 0.2856 0.2257 0.2628 0.5457 ** 0.2561 ln Pax -0.5311 ** 0.0720-0.7821 ** 0.0823-0.7321 ** 0.0783-0.5336 ** 0.0762 ln ATM 0.0712 0.0661 0.1165 * 0.0683 0.0984 0.0661 0.1015 0.0705 ln Cargo 0.0509 ** 0.0224 0.0464 * 0.0265 0.0579 ** 0.0251 0.0554 ** 0.0231 No of nearby airport -0.0428 0.0295-0.0035 0.0489-0.0264 0.0289 D hub 0.3143 ** 0.1045 0.5401 ** 0.1529 0.2616 ** 0.1050 D port 0.1427 0.1248 0.1181 0.2070 0.1392 0.1199 D authority 0.0392 0.0802-0.0045 0.1337 0.0957 0.0793 D southwest -0.2436 ** 0.0999 (dropped) ** -0.2885 * 0.1678-0.2118 ** 0.0998 2003 0.0433 * 0.0242 0.0475 ** 0.0233 0.0467 ** 0.0228 2004 0.0382 0.0247 0.0576 ** 0.0240 0.0540 ** 0.0235-0.0037 0.0247 2005 0.0543 ** 0.0256 0.0852 ** 0.0252 0.0798 ** 0.0246 0.0124 0.0254 2006 0.0666 ** 0.0266 0.1016 ** 0.0263 0.0956 ** 0.0256 0.0257 0.0264 2007 0.1006 ** 0.0277 0.1447 ** 0.0278 0.1370 ** 0.0270 0.0592 ** 0.0274 2008 0.1105 ** 0.0286 0.1628 ** 0.0290 0.1530 ** 0.0281 0.0695 ** 0.0281 2009 0.0922 ** 0.0288 0.1397 ** 0.0293 0.1294 ** 0.0283 0.0515 ** 0.0285 2010 0.1115 ** 0.0295 0.1604 ** 0.0301 0.1498 ** 0.0291 0.0721 ** 0.0292 Constant 5.6734 ** 1.5236 11.4564 ** 1.7608 9.8966 ** 1.6236 4.8937 ** 1.5882 Observation 463 463 463 410 R-squared 0.7231 0.7880 -- 0.7392

ATRS Airport Benchmarking Report The ATRS Global Airport Performance Benchmarking Report : 3 volumes, over 600 pages of valuable data and analysis. Can be purchased by visiting www.atrsworld.org Report sale finances our annual benchmarking research project Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) 48

Thank You 2013 ATRS World Conference (Bergamo, Italy June 26-29, 2013)