OBJECTION TO AMENDMENT TO PLANNING SCHEME AND GRANTING OF PLANNING PERMIT

Similar documents
Submission to Infrastructure Victoria s Draft 30-Year Infrastructure Strategy

5 Rail demand in Western Sydney

New free City connector bus service

TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION TO THE GREATER SYDNEY COMMISSION LANDS AT ARTARMON

Response to the London Heathrow Airport Expansion Public Consultation

WELLINGTON $422 MILLION $614 MILLION $83 MILLION 22% SPEND $1.9 BILLION

MELBOURNE METRO RAIL PROJECT EXPANDING MELBOURNE S UNDERGROUND RAIL NETWORK UPDATE FOR RESIDENTS OF THE DOMAIN PRECINCT APRIL 2016

Table 1 overleaf summarises the changes in planned growth between the 2016 and 2017 iterations of the plan.

Public Transport for Perth in 2031

Wellington $312 $49 $456 OVERVIEW WELLINGTON REGIONAL SUMMARY

CHRISTCHURCH MOTORWAYS. Project Summary Statement February 2010

The decision on whether to take enforcement action falls outside the scope of delegated powers.

FUTURE TRANSPORT STRATEGY AND GREATER SYDNEY SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN. Western Parkland City

Public Submissions in response to the Bill closed on 2 July 2015 and Council lodged a copy of the submission provided as Attachment 1.

REAUTHORISATION OF THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND AND CATHAY PACIFIC

Agenda Item 5: Rail East Midlands Rail Franchise Consultation

$960 $1,175 $91 OVERVIEW National Land Transport Programme Auckland AUCKLAND REGIONAL SUMMARY

Draft Western District Plan

AUCKLAND $1.2 BILLION $1.9 BILLION $149 MILLION 15% SPEND $5.7 BILLION

Sunshine Coast Airport Master Plan September 2007

E08. Kaufland Stores in Victoria Advisory Committee Epping. Request to be heard?:

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content

Kilometres. Blacktown. Penrith. Parramatta. Liverpool Bankstown. Campbelltown

Ian Saxon Assistant Executive Director, Environmental Services

Item 1. Leadership Board. On: 1 April Report by: Director of Development and Housing Services. Heading: Update on City Deal. 1.

Delivering better bus services for regional centres in Southern Tasmania

The Sunshine Coast is part of the global community and generates wealth through export, high-value industries and new investment.

A TRANSPORT SYSTEM CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

TOWN TRUST. Bury St Edmunds Railway Station

FLINDERS STREET STATION DESIGN COMPETITION STATEMENT OF KEY OBJECTIVES

Agenda 11. Strathclyde Bus Alliance progress update. Date of meeting 9 December 2016 Date of report 15 November 2016

Major Scheme Business Case Summary Report for Programme Entry

CHAPTER FIVE PROSPECTS FOR FUTURE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Airservices Australia Long Term Pricing Agreement. Discussion Paper April Submission by Australia Pacific Airport Corporation (APAC)

Living & Working Tourism

Guildford Borough Transport Strategy 2017, Topic Paper: Transport, June 2017 (accompanying Local Plan 2017) Local Plan Transport Strategy 2017

N4 Carrick-on-Shannon to Dromod Road Project. 2.1 Introduction

CBD Rail Link Business Case

PERTH-ADELAIDE CORRIDOR STRATEGY

Integration of Pedestrian Traffic Signal Control within SCOOT-UTC Systems

JOINT CORE STRATEGY FOR BROADLAND, NORWICH AND SOUTH NORFOLK EXAMINATION MATTER 3C EASTON/COSTESSEY

Bloor Street West Rezoning Application for a Temporary Use By-law Final Report

4 YORK REGION TRANSIT DON MILLS SUBWAY STATION ACCESS AGREEMENT

4 Transport projects underway in Western Sydney

EAST WEST RAIL EASTERN SECTION. prospectus for growth

33 Horseferry Road HP20 1UA London SW1P 4DR. Tuesday 10 th October Dear Sir,

West of England. Priority Places Requiring Public Investment

Llandudno Junction. Regeneration Proposals for the Future. December 2009

Old Limberlost Sports Club, Butlers Road, Handsworth Wood, Birmingham, B20 2NT

Strategic Transport Forum 21 st September 2018

Part four. In this part you will find: The next steps to deliver the master plan

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director / Senior Planning Policy Officer

Sunshine Coast Council Locked Bag 72 Sunshine Coast Mail Centre QLD Submitted via online portal. 2 June 2017.

A Response to: Belfast On The Move Transport Masterplan for Belfast City Centre, Sustainable Transport Enabling Measures

Submission on the Tukituki Catchment Proposal: EPA reference numbers; NSP 13/ , NSP 13/ , NSP 13/ , NSP 13/02.

ALL ABOARD LABOR S LONG TERM PASSENGER TRANSPORT STRATEGY

National Rail Performance Report - Quarter /14

Draft City Centre Transport Proposals

Upper Clutha Transport Report

2.2 For these reasons the provision of tourist signing will only be considered:

Date: 11 th January, From: Plaistow & Ifold Parish Neighbourhood Plan - Steering Group. Plaistow & Ifold Parish Council

CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL WRITTEN SUBMISSION

CAIRNS RECTANGULAR PITCH STADIUM NEEDS STUDY PART 1 CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL DRAFT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2011


Sharing the Way with Sustainable Transport Options

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 20 February 2013 Report of Handling by Development Quality Manager

WORLDWIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF LIBERALIZATION. Montreal, 24 to 29 March 2003

Greenwich Community Association Inc Submission to the NSW Department of Planning and Environment

Airdrie - Bathgate Railway and Linked Improvements Bill. Environmental Statement Page 1

PARKING CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS

Proposals for the Harrogate Road / New Line Junction Improvement Scheme. August / September Supported by:

Sustainable Urban Development. Presentation to WVCC 1 December 2010

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

NSW GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE VISITOR ECONOMY TASKFORCE REPORT

CITY OF MELBOURNE 10 Year Financial Plan People s Panel Report. 8 November 2014

Regulatory Committee

3. Coach Supporting Statement

Blackburn Road Blackburn Level Crossing Removal. Frequently Asked Questions August 2014 GENERAL

F6. Coastal Ferry Terminal Zone

Views of London Forum of Amenity and Civic Societies to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee on the Airports Commission report

SUMMARY PROOF OF EVIDENCE. Gerald Kells Transport Policy and Campaigns Advisor

SUBMISSION FROM RENFREWSHIRE COUNCIL

Consultation on Draft Airports National Policy Statement: new runway capacity and infrastructure at airports in the South East of England

The Bus Services Bill and Municipal Bus Companies

East Lancashire Highways and Transport Masterplan East Lancashire Rail Connectivity Study Conditional Output Statement (Appendix 'A' refers)

Review of Government Secondary School Requirements within the Sunbury South Precinct Structure Plan

City of Sydney Convenience Store Development Control Plan 2004

Environment Committee 24 September 2015

PLANNING THE SUNBURY GROWTH CORRIDOR

STRATEGIC INVESTMENT IN MANCHESTER AIRPORT

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

CAA consultation on its Environmental Programme

Your Transport Levy Your Transport Future. Sunshine Coast Council Transport Levy Annual Report

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

Supporting information to an application for preapplication 3 rd February 2017

Tourism 201 CHAPTER 10

uburbs Inner Eastern LLEN Region 27,298 FTE students in Government schools*** 177,361 * 397,525 Total population* 61,631 businesses 202,078 Boroondara

The Coalition s Policy

TRANSPORT FOR GREATER MANCHESTER COMMITTEE REPORT FOR RESOLUTION

As at 1 May Sponsoring Authority. Halton Borough Council. Halton Borough Council. Halton Borough Council. Halton Borough Council

Transcription:

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT ACT 1987 OBJECTION TO AMENDMENT TO PLANNING SCHEME AND GRANTING OF PLANNING PERMIT AMENDMENT C32 APPLICATION 0873/02 Public Transport Users Association Inc. 247-249 Flinders Lane MELBOURNE 3000 Tel: (03) 9650 7898 Fax (03) 9650 3689 www.ptua.org.au Contact: Les Chandra (President) president@ptua.org.au January 2003

Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Recommendation to Council... 3 Overview... 4 Impact of Development... 4 Urban Planning Framework... 5 Access and Equity... 5 Car Dependence and Road Congestion... 6 Public Transport Access... 7 Basic Service Standards for Public Transport... 9 Hours of Operation... 9 Minimum Service Frequencies... 9 About the PTUA... 10 Conclusion... 11 2

Executive Summary AMENDMENT C32 APPLICATION 0873/02 The PTUA opposes the expansion of Chadstone Shopping Centre on the following grounds 1.Chadstone is a Principal Activity Centre under Melbourne 2030, which is isolated from the major public transport networks. 2.Major upgrades to public transport are required to bring access to Chadstone up to standard. 3.It is counter-productive to permit large-scale increase in area at Chadstone before any public transport improvements are in place. The PTUA accepts that public transport provision is not the responsibility of the City of Stonnington. However, Stonnington can make a major contribution to the problem of car dependence by 1.Opposing inappropriate (car dependent) development. 2.Adopting pro-public transport planning policies (including desired minimum service standards) 3.Independently, and in conjunction with other local councils, making representations to state government to ensure that appropriate public transport is provided as a matter of urgency. Recommendation to Council 1.City of Stonnington refuse planning permission for expansion of Chadstone Shopping Centre as detrimental to good urban form and contrary to extant State planning policies 2.City of Stonnington enter into extensive negotiations with the State government to ensure that Chadstone is provided with adequate public transport to surrounding areas and fixed transport nodes during all hours of centre operation (including late night cinema/bookshop/restaurant opening) and encourage other local governments to do likewise 3.Council, in conjunction with Gandel and the Department of Infrastructure commence an extensive investigation into the present and future public transport needs of the Chadstone Shopping Centre and consequent implications for present and future service and infrastructure requirements. 4. City of Stonnington adopt the PTUA's recommendations for minimum public transport provision for Chadstone 3

Overview The City of Stonnington has invited submissions from affected individuals on Stonnington Planning Scheme Amendment C32, Application 0973/02. This details proposals by Gandel Project Management Pty Ltd (as agents for owners of the land) to make extensions to Chadstone Shopping Centre, situated at 1341 Dandenong Rd, East Malvern. Inter-alia, the proposal seeks to increase the retail space of Chadstone Shopping Centre by nearly 40 percent (from 106 000 to 146 000 square metres), eliminate restrictions on non-retail uses, and increase the number of car parking spaces from approximately 8 000 to 9 494. Impact of Development The PTUA of the view that the proposal in its current form will lead to excessive vehicular traffic and loss of amenity for residents in the immediate vicinity of Chadstone Shopping Centre, as well as the wider South-eastern suburbs. We also consider that the adoption of this amendment without modification is contrary to the spirit and substance of the State Government's Metropolitan Strategy that the City of Stonnington is required to uphold when making planning decisions. In order for an expanded Chadstone not to have a deleterious impact on both surrounding residents and Melbourne as a whole, this submission argues that a much stronger role for public transport must accompany any expansion proposal for Chadstone Shopping Centre. Given that this position is fully consistent with the Melbourne Metropolitan Strategy (which mandates a twenty percent share for public transport in 2030), we conclude that it is appropriate that the City of Stonnington require public transport improvements before Chadstone's expansion proposals are approved. The fact that Chadstone is a Principal Activity Centre does not give automatic right to further development. Rather, it is essential the development be carefully balanced with the improved infrastructure and service requirements of the area. In the case of Chadstone Shopping Centre, this balance has not been reached, and no further expansions to the Centre should be approved until and unless this balance has been reached. 4

Urban Planning Framework The current primary document for Urban Planning in Melbourne is Melbourne 2030, released in 2002 by the state government. Integration of land use with transport planning, together with significant increases in public transport patronage are key elements of Melbourne 2030: Improved integration of transport Activity centres and their future planning will play an important role in achieving the Government s target of 20 per cent of motorised trips on public transport by 2020. It will not be enough to focus on a small number of larger trip-generating activity centres, because even the top 100 activity centres (in terms of floor space) in metropolitan Melbourne account for less than 28 per cent of all trips. Our approach will need to cover the whole network of centres. The transport-related benefits of concentrating activities and providing a mix of uses in activity centres include reduced reliance on private motoring and higher use of more sustainable modes of transport such as walking, cycling and public transport. An important social outcome is improved accessibility to activities (and employment) by public transport. A good mix of uses also leads to more efficient design of public transport services and a spread of travel demand throughout the day. Access and Equity To ensure long-term economic growth and improvements in environment quality and social equity, we need to progressively decouple economic growth from increase in the use of private cars. -- Melbourne 2030 Strategy Integrated Transport (draft) p3 Despite it being within three kilometres of three suburban railway lines and being located in an established suburban area, we are concerned that Chadstone remains one of Melbourne's only major activity centres without good quality public transport access. As the centre expanded and extended its operating hours, transport services have fallen behind. Despite a three-fold increase in retail floor size, bus services to Chadstone are less frequent now than they were in 1984. The introduction of Sunday trading was not matched by an improvement to public transport; despite Sunday being one of the centre's busiest trading days. Six years on from the introduction of Sunday trading, just two bus routes operate on Sundays, with typical waits up to 70 or 80 minutes. The result is that public transport services are at their poorest when 5

Chadstone is at its busiest, and most Chadstone patrons have no practical choice but to drive. The lack of public transport results in two major sets of problems. 1.Serious traffic problems, both local and wider. Of specific concern are Warrigal Road Chadstone Road Malvern Road Dandenong Road (Princes Highway) Poath Road 2.Accessibility problems as facilities become only available by car. Although all members of society are affected, lack of accessibility particularly affects older people (who may not wish or be able to drive) and younger people (who may not have reached driving age, not have a car or have a 0% blood-alcohol limit). The types of services that are affected may include Government services (such as Medicare) Other health services (doctor, dentist) Other services (post office, banks, insurance) Recreational facilities (cinema, bowling alley, gym) Cafes, bars and restaurants It is notable that the proposed expansion of the centre will include a greater proportion of bulk-goods and similar retail that is not particularly suited to public transport access. Thus, it is essential that a significantly greater proportion of users of the leisure facilities, office and discretionary retail (such as fashion shopping) are transferred to public transport. Car Dependence and Road Congestion Most weekends, and particularly at peak times such as before Christmas and during post-christmas sales, car parking at Chadstone is at a premium, and traffic congestion within the centre almost to gridlock levels is not uncommon. This leads on to congestion on Warrigal and Dandenong Roads, which can have a major impact on travel times both on local trips in the vicinity of Chadstone, and for those passing through the area. At Chadstone, the car park capital, some people waited 30 minutes for a space. Many were impatient and parked on the nature strip on Dandenong Road, while getting there proved the biggest obstacle for others stuck in traffic on Warrigal Road. -- The Age, Shoppers hold up their end of the bargain 27/12/2002 6

The proposed expansion of the centre by some 30% (retail space) will also involve increasing car parking by almost 20%. With no expansion of public transport services, the current problems will be exacerbated, with more and more people arriving by car. This in itself flies in the face of the state government s Melbourne 2030 strategy, which aims to reduce, not increase car dependence. In fact it implies that the expansion of shopping centres should not be linked to expansion of car parks: Public Transport Access Upgrade and develop the Principal Public Transport Network and local public transport services to connect activity centres and link Melbourne to the regional cities -- Melbourne 2030. Policy 8.1 To decrease car dependence, better public transport needs to be provided, to allow consumers to have a choice about how they reach the centre. Because of its distance from train and tram routes, this relates primarily to bus services. The quality of bus services currently serving Chadstone is not sufficient to attract patrons who have a choice. While the area covered by Chadstone s bus services is large, almost all the services are far too infrequent to be useable. Most run at 30- minute frequencies on weekdays, and hourly or worse on Saturdays. The waiting time between buses alone is much longer than the travel time to the centre by car, even if the time taken to find a car space is added. At many times during centre operations (including Sunday, one of the two busiest days of trading), most bus routes are not running at all. Chadstone opening hours Weekday daytime 0900 to 1730 Thu-Fri evenings to 2100 Saturday 0900 to 1700 Bus routes operating 12 1 10 2 Typical service: Bus 623 Every 30 minutes None Hourly None St Kilda to Glen Waverley via Chadstone Sunday 1000 to 1700 By contrast, many of the older suburban shopping strip centres elsewhere in Stonnington have public transport services running 7 days a week from various directions. Frequencies are much higher, allowing significant numbers of people use these services to reach the centre. Malvern Central, for instance, is a smaller centre within the Glenferrie Road strip shopping centre, and has four full time transport routes within a few minutes walk. Malvern Central opening Weekday Thu-Fri Saturday Sunday 7

hours daytime evenings 0900 to 1700 1000 to 1700 0900 to 1730 to 2100 Routes operating Train: 2 Train: 2 Train: 2 Train: 2 Tram: 2 Tram: 2 Tram: 2 Tram: 2 Typical service: Tram 69 Every 12 Every 20 Every 12 Every 12 St Kilda to Kew via minutes minutes minutes minutes Malvern Stonnington, as the local council presiding over this planning application, has a role to play in reaching a more positive outcome in relation to transport. To allow this expansion of Chadstone without looking properly at the transport implications is to increase car congestion and dependency. Of particular importance for local government will be the approach taken to planning and development applications ensuring that land-use decisions support transport outcomes. Melbourne 2030 requires development to consider the principles of sustainability and integrating social, environmental and economic aspirations. In practical terms, this will mean clustering a range of activities and ensuring priority access for public transport vehicles, walkers and cyclists. -- Melbourne 2030 Strategy Integrated Transport (draft) p11 As part of the Chadstone expansion, bus services to the centre should be reviewed, with the aim of dramatically increasing the operating hours and frequency of services to allow more centre users the choice of travelling to Chadstone without their cars. This would reduce the impact of increased traffic congestion within the centre, on nearby arterial roads, and in surrounding local streets. Melbourne 2030 anticipates that public transport will need to be improved, particularly to Activity Centres such as Chadstone. However, major improvements of the type required have not yet occurred and do not appear to be planned for the near future. 8

Basic Service Standards for Public Transport If Public Transport is to make a major contribution to the Centre's transport needs, it is necessary that services be provided at all hours that the Centre is operating, as well as at frequencies that will attract those people who would otherwise use a car. Based on international standards, the PTUA presents the following as recommended minimum hours of operation and service frequencies: Hours of Operation Full service to be provided during retail hours and lesser service may be provided during other (leisure) hours. However, it should be noted that the service that is required in leisure hours is significantly greater than the peak hour service provided to the centre presently. Retail hours Monday - Wednesday Thursday and Friday Saturday Sunday 8am to 6.30 pm (to allow for workers) 8 am - 9.30 pm 8 am - 6 pm 8 am - 6 pm Leisure Hours Monday - Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 6.30 pm - Midnight 9.30 pm - 2 am 6 pm - 2 am 6 pm - Midnight Minimum Service Frequencies Retail hours: 10 minutes preferable, 15 minutes minimum Leisure hours: 15 minutes preferable, 20 minutes minimum Service Integration It is clear that all areas of Melbourne cannot be directly linked to Chadstone Shopping Centre by bus. For this reason, it is essential that bus services be integrated to the wider public transport network. In the case of Chadstone, this means providing services to local railway stations at frequencies that are compatible with the rail service. 9

About the PTUA AMENDMENT C32 APPLICATION 0873/02 The Public Transport Users Association Inc. is Victoria's leading consumer-based Public Transport advocacy group. Its mission states that: The PTUA is committed to An equitable society A healthy ecology A sustainable economy where Victorians can go anywhere, anytime, using a community controlled public transport system that is convenient, effective and safe. The strategic nature of Chadstone as a Principal Activity Centre for Melbourne together with concerns raised by its membership in the Southeastern suburbs has prompted it to produce this submission. In this submission, we can only briefly outline our concerns and briefly suggest some remedies. We look forward to being given the opportunity to present further to Council. 10

Conclusion AMENDMENT C32 APPLICATION 0873/02 The PTUA believes that further development of the Chadstone Shopping Centre in line with Application 0873/02 will lead to excessive vehicular traffic and loss of amenity for local residents and others in the Southeastern suburbs, and should be rejected. Chadstone Shopping Centre suffers from some of the poorest public transport services of any of the Principal Activity Centres throughout Melbourne. A significant improvement to public transport services are urgently required to service the existing shopping centre and further expansions will be required at the Centre grows. We believe that it is both inappropriate and contrary to the spirit of State Government's Metropolitan Strategy that further development be allowed before significant improvements to public transport are put in place. For this reason Amendment C32 should also be rejected. The fact that Chadstone is a Principal Activity Centre does not give automatic right to further development. Rather, it is essential the development be carefully balanced with the improved infrastructure and service requirements of the area. In the case of Chadstone Shopping Centre, this balance has not been reached, and no further expansions to the Centre should be approved until and unless this balance has been reached. 11