TRACK: B LANDSIDE/TERMINAL

Similar documents
FUTURE PASSENGER PROCESSING. ACRP New Concepts for Airport Terminal Landside Facilities

Kansas City Aviation Department. Update to Airport Committee Customer Service

Expediting the Customer Travel Experience IAAE FOAM CONFERENCE 14 MAY 2013

1.231J/16.781J/ESD.224J Airport Systems Fall Security and BHS. Amedeo R. Odoni. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Appendix F International Terminal Building Main Terminal Departures Level and Boarding Areas A and G Alternatives Analysis

ACRP Problem Statement No Recommended Allocation: -- ACRP Airport Baggage Handling Opportunity

FACILITATION PANEL (FALP)

Airport Capacity Improvement, Operation Efficiency and Passenger Satisfaction

SESSION 3 Future Planning & Flexibility

Airports of the Future Taking the Terminal to the Traveler

Sawasdee Krup. Applications of RFID in Aviation. Symbol RFID Ecosystem Summit. Bangkok May Louis Kirk

Aviation ICT Forum 2014

Total Airport Management Solution DELIVERING THE NEXT GENERATION AIRPORT

TRACK: B TERMINAL/LANDSIDE

7 Ways Facial Recognition Can Unlock A Secure, Frictionless and Personalized Travel Experience COURTESY OF A SINGLE, UNIFIED BIOMETRIC KEY

SAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

FACILITATION (FAL) DIVISION TWELFTH SESSION. Cairo, Egypt, 22 March to 2 April 2004

BNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5

Upgrading the International Arrivals Process

Baggage Screening System Recap Projects Panel

Collaboration for best Passenger Experience Check-In of the Future Enhancing the Passenger Experience

PRAJWAL KHADGI Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Northern Illinois University DeKalb, Illinois, USA

PASSENGER JOURNEY. Our vision: a seamless, secure and efficient walking pace journey that is highly personalized throughout.

Evaluation of Quality of Service in airport Terminals

Airport IT Are you ready for the future

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

2012 IATA GLOBAL PASSENGER SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS

Airport Planning and Terminal Design

A History of Innovation at London's Gatwick Airport

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Tampa International Airport Master Plan Update. December 12, 2012

Amsterdam Airport Schiphol

Public Workshop #7 Land Use Planning June 28, 2016

Annual General Meeting. April 15, 2010

01 Pre-Travel. Passenger Facilitation / Passenger Data Harmonization & Quality

AIRPORT OF THE FUTURE

IATA s Facilitation Priorities in the region

Fast Travel and Self-Service: Regulatory Opportunities & Challenges. Nathalie Herbelles Assistant Director, APCS Asia-Pacific

World Passenger Symposium

Six Must Have Capabilities to Improve the Passenger Experience

NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PROPOSED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION NOVEMBER 9 TH, 2018

Birmingham Airport 2033

THE TERMINAL OF THE FUTURE

TERMINAL 3. tour guide booklet. April 2012

United Kingdom Civil Aviation Authority

IRREGULAR OPERATIONS AIRPORT CONTINGENCY PLAN

IATA Passenger Experience Overview

Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). SUMMARY: Under this notice, the FAA announces the submission deadline of

Financing Infrastructure: Working with your Users. Julie Garg Manager Airport & ATC Charges

Passenger Experience

Configuration of Airport Passenger Buildings. Outline

FACILITATION PANEL (FALP)

Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Orlando International Airport One Jeff Fuqua Boulevard Orlando, Florida Memorandum TO: FROM:

White Paper: Assessment of 1-to-Many matching in the airport departure process

ASIS Middle East Conference 2015

CASE STUDY Amsterdam Airport Schiphol

We are the end to end solution for. PaxBag

SPRINGFIELD-BRANSON NATIONAL AIRPORT. Irregular Operations (IROPS) Contingency Plan STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

The demand/capacity analysis was performed utilizing Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) publications, including the following:

Norfolk International Airport

solutions Amadeus for ground handlers

System Oriented Runway Management: A Research Update

Going to the airport. A Guide for Children with Autism

Dave Allanby GM Operations SOUTH AFRICAN EXPRESS

NDC - One Order Pilot

Modeling Checked Baggage Requirements for Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Eric Miller

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Passenger Value of Time, BCA, and Airport Capital Investment Decisions. Thursday, September 13, :00-3:30 PM ET

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

12 th Facilitation Division

Border Security for Air Transport in the Pacific

PASSUR Aerospace. Departure Metering Program at Toronto Pearson International Airport. Training Manual

International Civil Aviation Organization ASSEMBLY 38TH SESSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE PROPOSED ROADMAP TO STRENGTHEN GLOBAL AIR CARGO SECURITY

Schiphol Group. Annual Report

BAGGAGE HANDLING SYSTEM MAKES FAST CONNECTIONS

An Easy-read Guide To Travelling By Air

General Session USING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY TO ENHANCE THE PASSENGER EXPERIENCE

Official Record Series 5

Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos. Juan Francisco García Lopez

CABIN BAGGAGE CHECKER

Grow Transfer Incentive Scheme

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

BAG LOG FUTURE-PROOFING CALGARY AIRPORT A DOUBLE FIRST AT SAN FRANCISCO IATA RESOLUTION 753: THE GOOD NEWS KEFLAVIK THE NEW NORTH ATLANTIC HUB

Safety Enhancement SE ASA Design Virtual Day-VMC Displays

Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport

Moving Towards a Customer Centric Approach. Dr. Philippe Villard Head, Policy & Economics

Ronan Delaney. DELANEY_RONAN_AVIATION_JUN_2018.DOCX

Performance monitoring report for 2014/15

7 Ways Face Recognition Can Unlock A Secure, Frictionless and Personalized Travel Experience COURTESY OF A SINGLE, UNIFIED BIOMETRIC KEY

Security Queue Management Plan

Aviation Workshop F. Goldnadel COO and Managing Director of Paris-CDG airport F. Mereyde Director of Paris-Orly airport

Airport Systems: Planning, Design, and Management

Smarter Journeys Start Here

Navitaire GoNow Day-of-departure services

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Module 1: One DHS Solution (APIS Pre-Departure and Secure Flight) Section 1: One DHS Solution Briefing August 2007

Vision for Intelligent Airports

Birmingham Airport Guide

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

STANSTED AIRPORT LIMITED REGULATORY ACCOUNTS PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH Financial Review...1. Performance Report...

Transcription:

Salt Palace Convention Center TRACK: B LANDSIDE/TERMINAL WORKSHOP: 1 Title: International Terminals Standards Outside of the US and Design Trends and Initiatives Moderator: Derek Moore, Skidmore, Owings & Merill LLP Date: March 2, 2016

Salt Palace Convention Center Title: International Terminals Standards Outside of the US and Design Trends and Initiatives Passenger Security Screening is Becoming Faster just not in the US (Yet!) Speaker: Regine Weston, Arup Date: March 2, 2016

Achieving Faster Effective Security March 2-4, 2016 Evolution of Passenger Security Screening Components of Passenger and Hand Bag Screening One Stop Security

Evolution of Passenger Security US Pre-9/11 ~2002-2009 2010-current 1 x-ray 1 WMD Processing rates up to 600 passengers per hour 2 x-ray 1 WMD Processing rates 240-280 passengers per hour 2 x-ray 1 AIT Processing rates 150-200 passengers per hour

Components March 2-4, 2016 Divestiture Baggage X-Ray Revestiture

Current US Condition Divestiture Length of divestiture ranges from a few feet to up to 20 feet Sequential process Other Countries 30-40 feet Multiple passengers simultaneously Requires automated tray return

Baggage X-Ray Current US Condition Single TSA Agent reviews all images immediately adjacent to x-ray device High Threat bag separation available at some locations Other Countries Matrix Screening where images are reviewed remotely Requires Bag buffering/high threat bag separation

Current US Condition Revestiture Revestiture ranges from a few feet to up to 12 feet All bags that are cleared arrive in sequence Other Countries 30-40 feet Bags not necessarily delivered in the same order as passengers nor grouped together

Evolving to Matrix Screening Lowerators Tray Return System Buffer & High Threat Table Matrix Screening Room Parallel Load

Completed Matrix Screening Manchester UK

Matrix Screening Amsterdam

Xander Richters/Schiphol Group Matrix Screening March 2-4, 2016 Amsterdam Automated Boarding Pass Reader 3 Divestiture Positions per Lane (X-Ray) I IAT per Lane (X-Ray) Revestiture & Secondary Screening

London Gatwick Matrix Screening Oslo

Geometry/Resourcing March 2-4, 2016 Once X-Ray is expedited, then The Capacity of a Security Lane is a combination of: Technology Security Machine Technology Type of lane and associated x ray equipment used (but doesn t relate to CIP) Manual or automatic tray returns systems (ATRS) Linear or parallel loading Local or remote screening Passenger scanning equipment AMD vs body scanners or a combination of these Location of secondary LAGs screening equipment Location and type of other secondary scanning equipment (e.g. shoe scanners) Circulation space for passengers Space Length provided for queue, divest/revest and composure Width provided for passenger circulation (taking into consideration column grid and equipment size) Level of resourcing/staffing Number of staff to operate each lane Equipment 140 180 pax/hr/lane Increased or remote staffing Increased lane length (revest and divest positions) 120 165 pax/hr/lane Typical Manual Lane Technology Resources/ Staffing Lane Length >200 pax/hr/lane Parallel loading ATRS New baggage technology Increased and/or remote staffing Increased lane length (revest and divest positions) 150 200 pax/hr/lane Parallel or Linear loading ATRS Technology New baggage scanning technology Technology/Equipment

Matrix Screening 22 18 Impact on Space Requirement TSA Standard 12.5 12.5 53 75 Comparison Matrix Screening vs. TSA Standard, for screening area only (not including queuing): Length is ~40% longer Area is ~100% larger Processing Rate is ~150%-200% greater

IATA Airport of the Future

One Stop Security March 2-4, 2016 ICAO Position The concept of One Stop Security should be advanced, where ICAO Member States, by virtue of recognising the equivalency of each other s aviation security regimes, can allow incoming passengers, baggage and cargo to transfer onto a connecting flight without being subjected, once again, to the same security controls as at the point of origin. (Modified to allow unilateral recognition) What it means Transfer passengers arriving from a country with security procedures that are acceptable to the hub airport s government do not have to be security screened Implications Hub airports outside the US can offer International transfer passengers a better experience with more time in retail and less time in queues

Salt Palace Convention Center Title: International Terminals Speaker: Joel Hirsh, Hirsh Associates, Ltd. Date: March 2, 2016

What can we learn from international (overseas) terminals? We re not in Kansas anymore!

We re not in Kansas anymore What can we learn from them. What are they learning from us.

The big differences Speak metric FAA airplane Design Groups (III) vs ICAO Codes (C) Holdroom Departure Lounge Departures Concourse The infamous ADRM

The IATA ADRM March 2-4, 2016 The IATA Airport Development Reference Manual (ADRM) What is it? Why so important to overseas users? What can we get from it?

ADRM through the ages 7 th ed. 1989 220 pages 8 th ed. 1995 300 pages ATRM ADRM LOS Arrives! & World Class 9 th ed. 2004 720 pages 10 th ed. 2014 600 pages (4 sections & counting)

ADRM 10 Passenger Terminal Introduction (Sec. 3.4.1) Note: The ADRM does not provide a definitive guide on how to design an airport terminal and it is not intended to be used in that context. As a consequence of these numerous variables, it is wholly misleading to surmise that the rigid application of the information contained within the ADRM will necessarily deliver the most appropriate solution.

Level of Service (LOS) Guidelines 9 th Edition 10 th Edition

Level of Service (LOS) Guidelines IATA ADRM 10 Exhibit 3.4.5.3

Level of Service (LOS) Guidelines 9 th Edition

US influences March 2-4, 2016 ACRP reports ACRP influences on the ADRM

The big differences between US and overseas Limited Ground Handlers Extensive CUTE

The big differences between US and overseas Outbound Passport Control

The big differences between US and overseas Gender segregation for security

The big differences between US and overseas Four separate flows: Domestic arrivals/departures Int l arrivals/departures

Thank You Joel Hirsh, Principal Hirsh Associates, Ltd. 203-438-7886 joel@hirsh-associates.com

Salt Palace Convention Center Title: Make America Great Again Speaker: Ty Osbaugh, AIA, Gensler Date: March 2, 2016

Salt Palace Convention Center TRACK: A (PLANNING) WORKSHOP: 1 Title: International Terminals-Standard Outside the US, Trends & Initiatives on Design Speaker: Stephan Poirier, The Calgary Airport Authority Date: March 2, 2016

The Calgary Airport Authority March 2-4, 2016 Passenger Volume: 15.48 million (2015) Cargo: 134,695 tonnes (2015) Elevation City of Calgary: 1084 m 3557 ft Runways: 11-29: 2,438 m 8,000 ft 08-26: 1,890 m 6,200 ft 17L/35R: 4,267 m 14,000 ft 17R/35L: 3,863 m 12,675 f Jobs created: 48,000 on airport: 24,000 in terminal: 12,000 GDP $8.28 billion

Call to Gate at YYC

Departures Hall D (International Departures) Key: Food & Beverage Retail & Services n elevators to

Departures Hall E (Transborder Departures) Key: Food & Beverage Retail & Services

C2G PHILOSOPHY GOAL STRATEGY Reduce pax anxiety/stress from fear of missing flight Provide education and information on C2G process live time Ensure air carriers maintain full control over their own boarding process Increase Operational flexibility Passengers are only directed to proceed to their gate when the Gate agent initiates that action Allocate gates later Encourage pax to shop/dine in retail plaza Minimal amenities in boarding zones (food/beverage, retail, charging stations, seating, etc.)

C2G MESSAGE WALKTHROUGH Passengers in the Check in Hall Communication tools and personnel will instruct passengers to proceed to their Departures Lounge (D or E) and consult flight information display screens there to find gate information.

Once inside the Departures Lounge, passengers will be greeted by Ambassadors at an InfoCentre located immediately in front of them. A 12 screen flight information display board is prominently placed for passengers to find out gate information.

C2G MESSAGE WALKTHROUGH Passengers in the Departures Lounge (D or E) At this point, depending on their Estimated Departure time, passengers will either see their gate assigned time, or will see their gate number already visible on the flight information display boards.

Gate Assigned Time is based on a formula that takes many variables into consideration in order to ensure there is ample, but not excessive, time to board. This formula is programmed into the C2G software and is pushed to the flight information display boards. EXAMPLE: Estimated Departure Time 18:00 Load Time 56mins Gate Assigned Time 17:04 LOAD TIME = Standard boarding time (45mins) + Walk time to the gate (6mins) + Buffer time (5mins)

Passengers in the Departures Lounge (D or E) Passengers can be confident that nothing will change until the Gate assigned time has been reached and therefore can make informed decisions on what to do with their time (fine dining versus food court, etc.)

When the Gate Assigned time is reached, the gate number will be shown and the status message will read Boarding begins shortly

Gate Agents have time at their gate to handle pre-board activities (Visa reconciliations, seat assignments, etc.) without the interruption of passengers. This status message will not change until the Gate Agent actions it.

At this point, all subsequent Boarding messages Pre-boarding, Boarding, Final Call, Closed, Departed are actioned by the Gate Agent. The boarding process remains in the control of the air carrier.

Passengers in the Departures Lounge (D or E) Status messages are not only visible on the flight information display boards, but a corresponding audible message will be heard in pre-defined paging zones as well.

Passengers in the Departures Lounge (D or E) To facilitate on time departures and passenger confidence and comfort, there are dozens of flight information display boards throughout the Departures Lounge, including at all fine dining establishments.

COMMUNICATION It is critical for passengers to understand the Call to Gate process in order for them to feel comfortable. There are several opportunities to describe the process to passengers: Describe C2G process Alert pax when gate is given Advise pax walk time to gate from their position YYC APP Web alert when pax are printing travel and boarding documents at home Web Kiosk alert when pax are printing travel and boarding documents at kiosk Kiosk Located centrally in the holdroom. Staff have access to gate numbers before they are posted InfoCentre

PASSENGER EXPERIENCE March 2-4, 2016 Call to Gate success requires a concerted effort to ensure passengers are comfortable and relax. SUCCESS CRITERIA On time Departure Continuous boarding (no bottlenecks) Informed and relax passengers DEPENDENCIES Accurately timed C2G messaging Sufficient queuing space in boarding zones Clear and intuitive wayfinding

Thanks Again! In closing Innovative concept for North America Will improve passenger experience Will increase commercial revenue Will increase operational efficiency and flexibility with gate allocation