RPAS Integration in the Airspace SESAR JU demonstration activities Catherine Ronflé-Nadaud

Similar documents
New issues raised on collision avoidance by the introduction of remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) in the ATM system

SESAR RPAS Definition Phase Results & Way Forward. Denis Koehl Senior Advisor SESAR Joint Undertaking

SESAR work on RPAS. Status and results 10/12/2015

SESAR RPAS Demonstration projects Progress and initial findings. Célia Alves Rodrigues, SESAR Joint Undertaking

RPAS integration in non segregated airspace: the SESAR approach

Airworthiness considerations for UAVs

UAS in European Civil Airspace: USICO and SINUE Results

ODREA Demonstration Report

Risk assessment for drones operations

Real-time Simulations to Evaluate the RPAS Integration in Shared Airspace

Flying SESAR from the RPAS Perspective. Robin GARRITY, SESAR JU ATM Expert Third SESAR Innovation Days, Stockholm, 26 th to 28 th November 2013

COLLISION AVOIDANCE FOR RPAS

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS): regulatory framework and challenges. NAM/CAR/SAM Civil - Military Cooperation Havana, Cuba, April 2015

Industria, Innovazione e Ricerca: Le nuove frontiere del volo a pilotaggio remoto

Products, Practices and Future

CEPT Workshop on Spectrum for Drones / UAS

The DFS perspective on safe and fair integration of UAS into the national airspace system

RPAS integration, French experimentation. DSAE: Colonel Jean-Patrick BORJA DIRCAM : Lieutenant-colonel Nicolas MEU

REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS SYMPOSIUM March Detect and Avoid. DI Gerhard LIPPITSCH. ICAO RPAS Panel Detect & Avoid Rapporteur

PBN Airspace Concept. ATS requirements

RPAS INTEGRATION INTO EU AIRSPACE. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE On CIVIL RPAS OPERATIONS

International Civil Aviation Organization. Satellite spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Establishing a Risk-Based Separation Standard for Unmanned Aircraft Self Separation

WORKSHOP 1 ICAO RPAS Panel Working Group 1 Airworthiness

RPAS/UAS Challenges in ATM. Peter Tannhäuser. Head of Legal Service 15 July 2015

EUROCONTROL AVAL Project. AVAL Phase 1 findings (presented by Thierry Arino)

GCAA GUYANA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY

JOINT AUTHORITIES FOR RULEMAKING OF UNMANNED SYSTEMS. Julia Sanchez on behalf of WG 1 Leader Benny Davidor 1

DEMORPAS Project. Final Dissemination Forum. 10th March 2016, World ATM Congress, Madrid

The Regulatory Framework for RPAs - An Air Navigation Services Perspective

THE MIDCAS PROJECT. Johan Pellebergs Saab Aerosystems. Keywords: UAS, Sense & Avoid, Standardization, Non-segregated Airspace

Policies for Certification, operation and maintenance of UAS Andres Eduardo Parra Catama Air Safety Inspector Civil Aviation Authority of Colombia

NASA s Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast: ADS-B Sense-and-Avoid System

Appendix A REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION FORM

ACAS on VLJs and LJs Assessment of safety Level (AVAL) Outcomes of the AVAL study (presented by Thierry Arino, Egis Avia)

AGENDA INTRODUCTION & PERSPECTIVE RPAS ACC. REQUIREMENTS EXTRACTION RPAS MALE HALE ACCOMMODATION RPAS CONTINGENCIES CONCLUSION

UAS in Canada Stewart Baillie Chairman Unmanned Systems Canada Sept 2015

The Defragmentation of the Air Navigation Services Infrastructure

REGULATION No. 10/2011 ON APPROVAL OF FLIGHT PROCEDURES INCLUDING SID-s AND STAR-s. Article 1 Scope of Application

Managing small RPAS/UAV operations in developing countries- a Bangladesh Experience. Presented by Bangladesh

GENERIC UAS ATM SAFETY ASSESSMENT BASELINE SCENARIO 2

For a 1309 System Approach of the Conflict Management

EUROCONTROL SPECIFICATIONS SYNOPSIS

SOFIA. Safe AutOmatic Flight Back and LandIng of Aircraft

Safety Brief. 21st March Operations in Somali Airspace

Airworthiness Regulatory Framework for Military Civil RPAS. Lt Col (Eng) Georgios Kokkalas

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) 101

Stepwise Integration of UAS into the ATM System

PBN and airspace concept

RPAS ATM CONOPS ATM.STR.CONOPS-RPAS.V4.0 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION. Document Title RPAS ATM CONOPS. Abstract. Keywords. Tel: ELECTRONIC BACKUP

SESAR Solutions. Display Options

The Legal Framework for RPAS/UAS Suitability of the Chicago Convention and its Annexes

European RPAS Roadmap RPAS Activities in SESAR th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar

USE OF REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT AND MODEL AIRCRAFT IN AVIATION

CAR Section II Series I Part VIII is proposed to be amended. The proposed amendments are shown in subsequent affect paragraphs.

Air4All Frequency Group Study on military spectrum allocations required for the Insertion into the GAT of the UAS

EASA NPA on SERA Part ENAV Response sheet. GENERAL COMMENTS ON NPA PACKAGE Note: Specific comments are provided after the General Comments

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) 101

MAURITIUS CIVIL AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENT CHAPTER 24

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) 101

Remotely Piloted Operations Integration

Technologies for Autonomous Operations of UAVs

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

GENERIC UAS ATM SAFETY ASSESSMENT BASELINE SCENARIO 1 UAS IFR Operations In Classes A, B or C En-Route Airspace

NASA s Role in Integration of UAVs

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) 101

Pre-Solo Written Exam (ASEL)

UAS Symposium Key Research Challenges and Opportunities

Surveillance Opportunities and Challenges

National Technology Project OUTCAST. M. Selier R&D Engineer Military Operations Research Department

FLIGHT ADVISORY WASHINGTON D.C. SPECIAL FLIGHT RULES AREA LEESBURG MANUVERING AREA

CONTROLLED AIRSPACE CONTAINMENT POLICY

European ATM Development The Big Idea

OPERATIONAL SAFETY STUDY

Use this safety advisor as an aid in making the presolo written test an effective learning tool. Intructor s Guide. Instructor s Guide

WP 09 Language proficiency for GA

ERASMUS. Strategic deconfliction to benefit SESAR. Rosa Weber & Fabrice Drogoul

Civil/Military Coordination Workshop Havana, Cuba April 2015

Electronic visibility via ADS-B for small aircraft. John Korna, NATS

Air Law and ATC Procedures Subject: AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

Spectral Efficient COMmunications for future Aeronautical Services. Jan Erik Håkegård ICT

34th ATS/Airline Safety Forum Health Check. Simon McDonald Safety Assurance

Civil Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) Regulations in Australia

UAS in the ATM environment How can the new technologies reduce the impact of the UAS in non-segregated areas

AIP PORTUGAL ENR NOV-2007

ICAO. Here is how the ICAO legal framework for drones is developed.

Air Law. Iain Darby NAPC/PH-NSIL IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency

Contents. Subpart A General 91.1 Purpose... 7

Trajectory Based Operations

Municipal Drone Operations Ben Roper City of College Station

TCAS RA not followed. Tzvetomir BLAJEV Stan DROZDOWSKI

4KM Purple Zone Maximum Flight Altitude 300 feet (90 metres) amsl (above mean sea level). See attachment for specific restrictions

JARUS guidelines on SORA. Annex C. Strategic Mitigation Collision Risk Assessment

Lone Star UAS Center. of Excellence and Innovation

COMMUNICATIONS PANEL. WG-I 20 Meeting

Municipal Drone Operations Ben Roper City of College Station

UAS/NAS Forum: Technology Milestones Necessary for NAS Certification Autonomy: Relating UAS Automation to Certification

Hazard Identification Questionnaire

INDEX. The association Operations Terrains Current regulations Stakeholders Incidents Future

Transcription:

RPAS Integration in the Airspace SESAR JU demonstration activities Catherine Ronflé-Nadaud October 2014 UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 1

UAV Program RPAS integration in the Airspace Unmanned Aircraft Systems (http://paparazzi.enac.fr) Civil applications for small UAS UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 2

Outline Introduction RPAS integration in the Civil Airspace SESAR JU Demonstrators ODREA TEMPAERIS Conclusion UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 3

Introduction RPAS categories Categories Range (km) Cruise Altitude (m) Endurance (hours) Weight (kg) Nano <1 100 <1 < 0,025 Micro <10 250 ~ 1 <5 Mini <10 300 <2 <150 (30) UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 4

Introduction RPAS categories Categories Range Cruise Altitude (m) Endurance (hours) Weight (kg) Medium Altitude Long endurance > 500 14 000 24->48 1 500 High Altitude Long Endurance > 2000 20 000 24->48 4 500-> 15 000 UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 5

Introduction RPAS Missions 60 000 ft 45 000 ft Altitude MALE HALE 1000 ft 500 ft 150 kg Mini Micro Endurance 1h 2h 30h UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 6

Introduction Foreseeable future Small and mini RPA flying at Very Low Level (VLL) will experiment a fast development as they could be relatively cheap, provide some valuable services for very local observation and some of them being already available. HALE RPAS will be used for civil applications as they might represent the most reliable UAVs being able to lift the appropriate civil avionics equipment required (though yet not sufficient) for manned traffic integration. Very high altitude RPAS could start some earlier evaluation according to the market demand and the associated RPAS availability. Being expected to fly above common civil traffic, they would hardly interfere with the current manned traffic and allow some high-end operation validation. Civil operations of RPAS at medium altitude outside segregated areas would not start before several years due to the lack of avionics devices adapted to their medium size. Source : ICONUS, SESAR JU Project, 2012 UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 7

RPAS integration ATM System Boundary Strategic Conflict Management ATM model Separation Provision Collision Avoidance Demand - traffic volume / pattern Potential Conflicts Airspace Design Flow & Capacity Management Procedural Deconfliction Conflict Avoidance ATC Tactical De-confliction Separation Infringement ATC Recovery Pilot Recovery Overload Protection Conflict Prevention Conflict Resolution Recovery UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 8

RPAS integration Responsibility for RPAS separation provision Source : ICONUS, SESAR JU Project, 2012 UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 9

RPAS integration C3 Link Source : ICONUS, SESAR JU Project, 2012 UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 10

RPAS Integration Cooperative Detect&Avoid Avoidance maneuver Non cooperative Sensors hybridation, simulations, TCAS compatibility, demonstrators UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 11

SESAR JU demonstrators SESAR JU launched 9 RPAS Demonstrators in October 2013 : Laboratory UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 12

SESAR JU demonstrators ENAC is involved in 2 demonstrators : - ODREA (www.odrea.org ) - TEMPAERIS (www.tempaeris.org ) Objectives : Define CONOPS and operational procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency) Validation with simulations using real traffic (registered) With qualified Air Traffic Controllers Fast simulations Real flights with OPV (Optionaly Piloted Vehicles) non-segregated airspace UAV voice 1 voice 2 mode-s transponder TM, sensors data TC voice 1 voice 2 voice 3 cooperative aircraft mode-s transponder GCS ATC UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 13

ODREA Consortium Aeronautics Industry Coordinator RPAS Manufacturer and Operator Resp. Demonstrations ANSP Resp. Simulations Civil Aviation Univ. Resp. Operational Procedures and Project Communication UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 14 14 / 13

ODREA Objectives 1. Define & validate CONOPS and procedures for RPAS (SID, STAR...) 2. Investigate and Demonstrate (Simulations + Flights): Capability to integrate an RPA into the managed traffic of mid size commercial airport Capability to conduct missions in lower airspace, incl. abnormal situations (C2 link loss, D&A, ) UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 15 15 / 13

ODREA Real flights 1. Muret Lherm (LFBR) GenAv towered aerodrome 2012: 88,000 mvts General aviation aircraft 2. Toulouse Blagnac(LFBO) Int l commercial airport 2013: 95,000 mvts (Rk d 6 th ) B&R to Airbus aircraft 3. Temporary Restricted Area 400 km2 Safety during D&A demo 1 OPV + 1 BE58 UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 16 16 / 13

TEMPAERIS Consortium ANSP Simulations Coordinator of the project Project documentation RPA Systems Manufacturer Real flights CONOPS definition Validation methods UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 17

TEMPAERIS Simulations RPAS insertion on a middle size airport (Bordeaux). The simulations focus on : assessing the impact of slow RPAS (MALE) on traffic safety and regularity at a mid-sized, mid-traffic density airport, assessing the impact on ATC performance of RPAS non nominal modes (communication failure, command and control failure). UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 18

TEMPAERIS Real flights The flights will be done by an OPV in Bordeaux TMA UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 19

Conclusion In 2035, 245 000 RPAS will fly, among them 175 000 for aerial work (John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Study) RPAS Certification Needs for operational procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency) UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 20 20

Questions? UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 21 21

RPAS integration Airspace Classes (ICAO Annexe 2) Class Type of Flight Separation Provided Traffic Information Radio Comms Required Subject to ATC Clearance A IFR IFR/IFR YES YES YES B C IFR IFR/IFR IFR/VFR YES YES YES VFR VFR/IFR VFR/VFR IFR IFR/IFR YES IFR/VFR YES YES VFR VFR/IFR VFR/VFR IFR IFR/IFR IFR/VFR D VFR NIL VFR/IFR VFR/VFR YES YES E IFR IFR/IFR YES YES YES VFR NIL As far as practical NIL F IFR As far as practical Flight YES Information VFR NIL Services NO G IFR NIL Flight YES VFR NIL Information Services NO NO NO NO UAV Program / C.Ronflé-Nadaud 22