Title VI Analysis for Route Based Fares

Similar documents
Learn more and comment. See page 10 for details. Proposed Fall 2018 / Spring 2019 SERVICE EXPANSION. and FARE CHANGE

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

PLEASE READ Proposal for Sustainable Service

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

Approval of August 2019 Service Changes

All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3

The 15-day comment period will run from Thursday, April 4, 2019 to 4pm on Wednesday April 18, 2019.

Purpose and Need for the Proposed Project

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

All questions in this survey were voluntary; all results are based on number of respondents who answered the relevant question.

Welcome! This open house provides an early look at: Garage layout and access Potential pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements

Fare Revenue Report 2016 FARE REVENUE REPORT

Corridor Analysis. Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead

(C)Flexible Fare Effective Date: May 1, 2014

October 12th 2015 DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Updating the vision for regional transit

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Bus Corridor Service Options

Proposed June 2015 Service Changes

The Boulder (and Boulder County) Experience. June 6 th, 2017 RTD s Pass Program Working Group 2 nd Meeting

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

East Link Project Update. Maintenance of Traffic During Construction. April 21, 2015

West Seattle / Downtown Seattle

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

Horizon 1 Implementation Update

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

Welcome. Sign in Pick up comment form Visit stations to learn more Submit your comment form

Analysis of Transit Fare Evasion in the Rose Quarter

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Snohomish County Planning and Development Services Run Date: 05/07/07

CHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN 1

Snohomish County Planning and Development Services Run Date: 09/08/2003

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

Table of contents. Sound Transit 2 Plan map... A-2

Recommendation on bus/rail bus/rail experiments #78 Montrose Bus Six University of Chicago bus routes Six Westside/W est estside/w Suburban

WELCOME AND AGENDA DOWNTOWN REDMOND LINK EXTENSION

2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

DC Circulator Service Changes. Implementation Plan for June 24, 2018

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon

Sound Transit Service Standards and Performance Measures Edition

Memorandum. DATE: May 9, Board of Directors. Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director. Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program

Paratransit Bus Services Guide

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #FarePolicy

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

Annual Transit Ridership Monitoring Report Fiscal Year

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

APPENDIX H Transportation Projects Considered for Cumulative Impact Analysis

SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT + SAN LUIS OBISPO RTA JOINT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS: SERVICE STRATEGIES. Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP; Principal

Puget Sound Trends. Executive Board January 24, 2019

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Summary of Proposed NH 120 Service

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD. Title VI Equity Analysis Proposed Weekend Service Changes FY2017 March

Matt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager

Why does 2010 feel like the dark ages for fare collection? Fred Combs Lextran, Planning and Technology Manager Lexington, Kentucky

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

Providing public transportation since 1999 between Washington and Milwaukee Counties

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

2017 Proposed Service Changes. For Public Meetings January 2017

2014 WIAA DAIRY FARMERS OF WASHINGTON/ LES SCHWAB TIRES HARDWOOD CLASSIC BASKETBALL REGIONALS LODGING & DINING GUIDE

1 SUBWAY EXTENSION TO VAUGHAN CORPORATE CENTRE - OPERATING AGREEMENT UPDATE

2.0 Miami-Dade Transit System Overview

YRT/VIVA PROPOSED FARE INCREASE

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

DISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, FloridaExpressLanes.com

STA MOVING FORWARD A plan for more and better transit services

District of Summerland COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA

Research Report Agreement T4118, Task 24 HOV Action Plan HOV ACTION PLAN

Table of Contents. List of Tables

4 YORK REGION TRANSIT DON MILLS SUBWAY STATION ACCESS AGREEMENT

SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Service Plan

September 2019 Service Revisions

1.2 Corridor History and Current Characteristics

This report recommends two new TTC transit services in southwest Toronto.

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

Silver Line Operating Plan

DIRECTIONS TO SITES. Arlington School District

2018 Transit Summit. Board Room, First Floor, Government Center June 25, :00 PM

(This page intentionally left blank.)

BRIEFING Subject: 2017 Visitation Initiatives

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

The Importance of Service Frequency to Attracting Ridership: The Cases of Brampton and York

Like many transit service providers, the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Port Authority) uses a set of service level guidelines to determine

2018 Service Changes Ada County

Greater Portland Transit District

Transcription:

ATTACHMENT 2 Title VI Analysis for Route Based Fares BACKGROUND Title VI policy requires analysis of proposed fare changes to identify disparate or disproportionate impacts to minority and low income populations. Disparate impact is defined as the adverse effect of a practice or standard that is neutral and non-discriminatory in its intention but, nonetheless, disproportionately affects individuals belonging to a particular group based on their age, ethnicity, gender or disability. If any such impacts exceed adopted thresholds, Title VI policy requires justification for the impacts, evaluation of lower impact alternatives and/or mitigation. Although this proposal is not a fare change, the policy could impact how riders use Community Transit s fixed-route system and which fares they chose to pay. STATUS Proposal: Community Transit is evaluating the impacts of a fare policy change to implement route-based fares or one fare per service type: Local, South County Commuter and North County Commuter. Currently there are two de-facto zone fares: 1. The proposed change requires elimination of the Local fare override on trips taken on intercounty commuter routes, when the trip is entirely within Snohomish County. For example, a rider can board Route 421 (Marysville to downtown Seattle) and request the Local fare if they are traveling from Marysville to the Lynnwood Transit Center. 2. The proposed change also require elimination of the South/Everett Commuter Fare Override available on the North/East Commuter Routes 421, 422, 425 and 821 ($5.50 fare). A lower ($4.25) fare is currently available to customers who use these long-haul commuter routes only between south Snohomish County and King County. Customers who use these long-haul routes for shorter trips must request a South/Everett Commuter Override when boarding the bus in King County for the afternoon trips northbound. Analysis: Based on the 2013 On-Board Rider Survey, there are only three commuter routes that met the minority classification (Routes 413, 821 and 855), and no commuter routes met the low-income classification. Ridership and fare payment analysis, concluded that less than 2% of Community Transit boardings on inter-county commuter routes included the Local Override option. On a per route basis, the range is from 0% to 5% of all boardings. For the North County commuter routes, with a stop at Lynnwood Transit Center, the South/Everett Commuter fare override accounts for 30% of fares. On a per route basis, the range is from less than 1% to 33% of all boardings. The Title VI analysis studied whether customers who currently use inter-county commuter routes for local trips within Snohomish County would have a viable local route alternative under the new fare policy. An example is Route 412 that operates between Silver Firs and Seattle with a stop at McCollum Park: a trip between Silver Firs and McCollum Park can also be made taking local Route 109. The analysis found that there are local route options (Swift, 100 and 200 series routes) to complete an in-county trip, at the local fare for all routes, except a portion of Route 416. The exception on Route 416 (Edmonds to Seattle) is a one-mile section on SR-104 that would be without a local service option,

requiring a rider to pay the full commuter fare. Route 416 is not a Title VI route (it has predominantly non-minority and non-low-income riders) and local-overrides represent 3% of the daily boardings. The same analysis was completed for the North/East Commuter Routes 421, 422, 425 and 821 that stop at Lynnwood Transit Center, allowing for a South/Everett Commuter fare override. Based on April 2017 data, there is sufficient capacity for riders to chose another South/Everett Commuter Route or take Sound Transit. Both options allow customers to continue making trips from south Snohomish County to downtown Seattle or the University District without paying a higher fare. CONCLUSION The Title VI analysis concluded that this fare policy change would not result in a disparate impact or disproportionate burden on Title VI populations. Page 2

DATA & ANALYSIS Title VI Route Analysis (2013 On Board Rider Survey) Minority and Non-Minority Routes Route Minority Non-Minority Minority Non-Minority Minority Route? 402 113 277 28.97% 71.03% No 405 25 77 24.51% 75.49% No 410 51 105 32.69% 67.31% No 412 32 107 23.02% 76.98% No 413 149 229 39.42% 60.58% Yes 415 92 195 32.06% 67.94% No 416 21 76 21.65% 78.35% No 417 32 62 34.04% 65.96% No 435 14 39 26.42% 73.58% No 810 3 12 20.00% 80.00% No 855 40 34 54.05% 45.95% Yes 860 18 53 25.35% 74.65% No 871 33 76 30.28% 69.72% No 880 15 28 34.88% 65.12% No 421 58 156 27.10% 72.90% No 422 15 55 21.43% 78.57% No 424 7 22 24.14% 75.86% No 425 32 98 24.62% 75.38% No 821 20 31 39.22% 60.78% Yes Low-income and Non-Low-Income Routes Route Low-Income Non Low-Income Low-Income Non Low-Income Low-Income Route? 402 28 286 8.92% 91.08% No 405 8 71 10.13% 89.87% No 410 9 113 7.38% 92.62% No 412 5 105 4.55% 95.45% No 413 6 283 2.08% 97.92% No 415 11 229 4.58% 95.42% No 416 2 76 2.56% 97.44% No 417 7 65 9.72% 90.28% No 435 1 44 2.22% 97.78% No 810 2 8 20.00% 80.00% No 855 11 42 20.75% 79.25% No 860 6 44 12.00% 88.00% No 871 8 78 9.30% 90.70% No 880 3 32 8.57% 91.43% No 421 13 148 8.07% 91.93% No Page 3

422 1 51 1.92% 98.08% No 424 20 100.00% No 425 5 91 5.21% 94.79% No 821 10 32 23.81% 76.19% No Community Transit operates 19 commuter routes. Only 2 of the commuter routes begin at a park & ride facility and then use a direct access ramps onto I-5, prohibiting local trips. Five of the routes (421, 422, 424, 425 and 821) provide morning and afternoon express service between north and east Snohomish County to south Snohomish County. The following table illustrates the local service option for each commuter route being used for local service. Route Local Options 402 Not applicable this route begins at LTC and uses the direct I-5 ramp 405 Swift and Route 101 on Hwy 99 + Route 119 on 220 th St SW 410 Routes 201 or 202 connecting Mariner P&R with Swamp Creek P&R Route 201 + Routes 120 or 112 connecting Mariner P&R to Mountlake Transit Center 412 Route 109 Silver Firs to McCollum P&R 413 Route 112 between 36 th Ave W and Ash Way P&R or Route 119 between 148 th St and Ash Way P&R Routes 112 or 119 between Ash Way P&R and Mountlake Terrace P&R 415 Same local alternative route option as Route 413 416 Route 130 between Edmonds Station to Mountlake Terrace Transit Center covers most of the same routing 417* Route113 operates in Mukilteo between the Mukilteo Ferry and Beverly Park Rd. Routes 113 + 119 between Mukilteo and Ash Way Park & Ride 421 Routes 201 or 202 connect Marysville with Lynnwood Transit Center 422 Route 240 + Routes 201 or 202 connect downtown Stanwood with Lynnwood Transit Center 424 Routes 270 and 271 connect the City of Snohomish with Monroe 425 Route 208 + Route 201 or Route 109 + Route 202: there are additional options that require 3 buses connecting Lake Stevens with Lynnwood Transit Center. 435 Routes 105 and 106 both connect Mill Creek with Canyon Park and Bothell Routes 105 + 115 + 119 connecting Bothell with Mountlake Terrace Transit Center Sound Transit also provides another alternative with Routes 535 + 512 810 Route 109 between McCollum Park and Mariner P&R and Ash Way P&R Route 115 or Routes 105+ 130 between McCollum Park and Lynnwood Transit Center Routes 115 + ST 512 between McCollum Park and Mountlake Terrace Transit Center 821 Same local alternative route option as Route 425 855 Not applicable this route begins at LTC and uses the direct I-5 ramp 860 Same local alternative route option as Route 412 871 Route 115 or Route 115 + Route 202 or Route 105 + Route 120 there are additional alternative connecting McCollum P&R with Mariner P&R and Ash Way P&R Page 4

880 Route 113 for Mukilteo Ferry Terminal to Beverly Park Road Route 115 + Route 130 or Route 116 + 130 there are additional alternatives connecting Edmonds P&R to the Mountlake Terrace Transit Center. Local routes (Swift, 100 and 200 series routes) run in both directions, all-day; where, as the Commuter routes (400 and 800 series) run during the AM and PM peak commutes and operate in one direction. In the morning, the bus run from destinations in Snohomish County south to King County: in the afternoon, the commute reverses and the buses operate from King County to destinations in Snohomish County. The following table provides the alternative South/Everett Commuter Routes that provide for the North/East Commuter Routes (421, 422, 424, 425 and 821) that currently stop at Lynnwood Transit Center and allow the South/Everett Commuter Override. The Table also illustrates available average daily seats available on the alternative routes at Lynnwood, based on April 2017 data. Route Average Daily Boardings with South County Commuter Override South/Everett Commuter Route Alternative Average Daily Available Capacity on 402 & 511 421 260 Routes 402 and Sound 459 Transit 511 422 60 Routes 402 and Sound 459 Transit 511 425 77 Routes 402 and Sound 459 Transit 511 Sub Total 397 459 821 52 Route 855 104 Rider impacts: less than an average of 2% of all Community Transit boardings include the Local Override option on commuter routes: the. The following table illustrates this information in three ways: A) by route, B) passenger type and fare payment, and C) average weekday boardings by route. A) Route (September 2015 - August 2016): Route % Local Override % South/Everett Commuter Override 402 0.00% 405 0.39% 410 2.12% 412 1.40% 413 1.20% 415 2.19% 416 1.57% 417* 4.72% 421 2.49% 32.73% 422 5.06% 32.05% Page 5

424 0.33% 0.48% 425 3.64% 33.43% 435 2.95% 810 2.43% 821 2.05% 23.48% 855 0.00% 860 1.79% 871 1.12% 880* 5.50% * The September 2016 Service Change removed the Lynnwood Transit Center stop on both Routes 417 and 880, further reducing the opportunity for riders to use the commuter routes as local in-county express service. B) Products (September 2015 - August 2016): Local Fare Override Rate S. County Commuter Fare Override Cash 6% Not Available ORCA E-Purse 4% 28% ORCA Monthly Pass 3% 32% ORCA CT Passport* 10% 1% ORCA Regional Passport 1% 27% * The CT Passport product is only available for Edmonds Community College and Everett Community College Transit Programs. C) Average Daily Boardings by Route for Override vs. Total Boardings (October 2016, ORCA boardings): Route ADB with Local Overrides ADB with S/E Commuter Override Total Average Daily Boardings 402 0 1,394 405 4 244 410 16 540 412 9 939 413 25 1,675 415 29 1,309 416 7 238 417* 9 251 421 19 260 774 422 19 60 169 424 4 6 165 425 15 77 299 435 21 556 810 9 359 821 5 52 240 855 0 649 860 15 898 Page 6

871 10 728 880* 49 674 Total 265 * Routes 417 and 880 no longer stop at Lynnwood Transit Center, eliminating the opportunity for direct connections between Mukilteo and Lynnwood via commuter routes Capacity Analysis for South/Everett Commuter Route Alternatives for Routes 421, 422, 425 and 821 (April 2017 APTS data). Vehicle Type Actual Average Capacity AVG. Max Load Highest Max Load Available Seats at LTC Max Load-to- Actual Seat Ratio DBT 77 46 58 30.6 60.1% DBT 77 46 62 30.3 60.4% DBT 76 58 70 18.1 76.3% DBT 77 53 83 23.7 69.1% DBT 77 54 70 23.0 70.0% DBT 75 41 65 34.5 54.3% DBT 76 57 73 19.1 75.0% DBT 77 56 68 20.4 73.4% DBT 77 56 83 20.9 72.8% DBT 75 57 90 18.0 76.1% DBT 77 46 63 30.4 60.3% DBT 76 46 62 30.4 60.2% 916 617 299 Route Arrival Time LTC Trip # Vehicle Type Actual Average Capacity AVG. Max Departure Load at LTC Max Departure Load at LTC (April 2017) Available Seats at LTC Max Loadto-Actual Seat Ratio 511 5:08 AM 25064 STA 56 46 55 10.4 81.5% 511 5:28 AM 25065 STA 56 54 73 1.7 97.0% 511 5:48 AM 25066 SDD 69 58 75 10.8 84.3% 511 6:04 AM 25067 SDD 82 55 70 27.3 66.7% 511 6:20 AM 25068 STA 56 47 59 9.4 83.3% 511 6:35 AM 25069 SDD 73 39 50 34.0 53.4% 511 6:49 AM 25070 STA 56 36 48 19.9 64.6% 511 7:04 AM 25071 SDD 78 35 52 42.8 45.2% 511 7:20 AM 25072 SDD 69 34 57 35.5 48.8% TOTALS: 595 404 192 Page 7

Route Sched. start Trip Vehicle Type Seating Capacity AVG. Max Load (zero values excluded) Max Load-to- Actual Seat Ratio 855 5:51 22296 ART 58 52.0 89.8% 6.0 855 6:20 22297 ART 58 38.7 66.9% 19.3 855 6:37 22298 ART 58 30.6 52.8% 27.5 855 7:03 22299 ART 58 26.4 45.8% 31.6 855 7:18 22300 ART 58 38.1 66.1% 20.0 TOTALS: 290 185.7 104.3 Page 8