Amtrak International Operations to Canada Eastern Border Transportation Coalition May 25, 2011
Brief History First Amtrak operations to Canada and Mexico ordered by Congress 1972 Seattle Vancouver Pacific International Washington Montreal Montrealer Ft. Worth Laredo Inter-American Later additions New York Detroit Niagara Rainbow Chicago Port Huron Sarnia Toronto International New York Toronto Maple Leaf Only one operating today in original form 1
Current Operations Amtrak Cascades Portland Seattle Vancouver BC First train since 1995; second train since 2009 Maple Leaf New York Niagara Falls Toronto Since 1981 replacing a former VIA Rail Canada connection Adirondack New York Rouses Point Montreal Since 1974 All are current or prospective state corridor trains under Section 209 of PRIIA All but second Vancouver train pre-date 9/11 2
Potential Future Operations Vermonter extension north of St. Albans to Montreal Tentatively late 2012 High priority for Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin Would reconstitute former Montrealer but on a daytime schedule Continental Rail Gateway New Detroit Windsor tunnel After 2014 Potential Chicago Detroit Toronto Montreal combined Amtrak / VIA Rail Canada corridor 3
4 International Ridership 0 50 100 150 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* Thousands Northbound Southbound Cascades (Vancouver) 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Oct-06 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Riders Northbound Southbound 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* Thousands Northbound Southbound Maple Leaf (Toronto) 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Oct-06 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Riders Northbound Southbound 0 20 40 60 80 100 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* Thousands Northbound Southbound Adirondack (Montreal) 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Oct-06 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Riders Northbound Southbound Annual Monthly *through March *through March *through March
Lack of Process for Border Security Customs and Immigration inspection processes evolved locally and independently following 9/11 Before 9/11 informal on-train screening was satisfactory Passenger rail does not fit air or highway models Issues other than terrorism On train inspection no longer satisfactory from the perspective of border agencies Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 5
Agency Issues with On-Board Inspection Lacks the privacy to properly interview travelers especially about sensitive issues Inability to clearly match every item of baggage to its owner Poor connectivity with agency information technologies Safety and security risks with potentially unruly passengers and officer firearms Inability to inspect a completely empty train 6
Amtrak Issues with Enroute Off-Board Inspection Serious inconvenience to passengers Unsafe at low platforms especially in bad weather Elderly and ADA passengers Passengers carrying infants and small children Long border dwell times cause longer trip times All passengers must wait until the last passenger has cleared Frequent delays would exacerbate poor on-time performance at down-line stations In conflict with intent of PRIIA to improve on-time performance 7
Possible Solutions End point customs and immigration processing in Canada with non-stop closed-door operation north of the border Vancouver Montreal New methods for on-board processing that mitigate concerns of border authorities Niagara Falls for Toronto 8
More Immediate Issues Amtrak Cascades at Vancouver CBSA funding for the second train ends October 31 New funding must be obtained to avoid discontinuance Maple Leaf at Niagara Falls Canadian National abandoning Whirlpool Bridge rights Bridge Commission seeking agreement with new operator Quick resolution needed before service must be discontinued Adirondack at Montreal Both CBSA and Amtrak want to do C&I in Montreal Tentative conceptual plan developed by Amtrak Funding required to validate concept in Canada Alternative could be a full offload of passengers and baggage at the border 9
High Speed Rail Overview
Federal Investment Highlights (2009-2011) 11
Summary of Federal Investments (2009-2011) 12