Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Similar documents
Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

BC Ferries Customer Satisfaction Tracking Survey SAILING HEADER

National Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first

National Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first

Gabriola Island Ferry Advisory Committee

National Passenger Survey Autumn putting rail passengers first

2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results

National Passenger Survey Autumn putting rail passengers first

Ferry Fact File. Gabriola Ferry Advisory Committee

Prepared for: TOMM Committee Kangaroo Island CB Contact: Ben Nitschke, Account Manager Phone: (08)

AVSP 7 Summer Section 1: Executive Summary

JUNEAU BUSINESS VISITOR SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

National Rail Passenger Survey Autumn 2013 Main Report

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX OF SINGAPORE 2017 Q2 RESULTS OVERVIEW AIR TRANSPORT AND LAND TRANSPORT

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018

2013 Travel Survey. for the States of Guernsey Commerce & Employment Department RESEARCH REPORT ON Q1 2013

Tram Passenger Survey

ISE INDUSTRY FORUM CSISG 2018 Q2 RESULTS Announcement INSTITUTE OF SERVICE EXCELLENCE SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY

Recreationists on the Gifford Pinchot National Forest: A Survey of User Characteristics, Behaviors, and Attitudes

YARTS ON-BOARD SURVEY MEMORANDUM

Prepared for: TOMM Committee Kangaroo Island CB Contact: Naomi Downer, Account Director Phone: (08)

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

AVSP 7 Summer Section 20: Methodology

National Passenger Survey TOC Report for Chiltern Railways Autumn 2011

St. Johns River Ferry Patron Survey May 16, 2012

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX OF SINGAPORE 2018 Q2 RESULTS OVERVIEW AIR TRANSPORT AND LAND TRANSPORT

National Rail Passenger Survey Autumn 2015 Main Report

Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Visitors Summer 2008 Summary of Findings

1.0 BACKGROUND NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES STUDY APPROACH EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

Agritourism in Missouri: A Profile of Farms by Visitor Numbers

Network Rail 2014 Customer Survey Report

2015 Travel Survey. for the States of Guernsey Commerce & Employment Department RESEARCH REPORT ON Q1 2015

BC Ferry Commission Comparative Fare Analysis on Selected Ferry Routes

Survey into foreign visitors to Tallinn Target market: Cruise voyagers. TNS Emor March 2012

British Columbia Ferry Services Inc. Annual Report to the British Columbia Ferries Commissioner. Year Ended March 31, 2012

Room 4 - Mary Winspear Centre, 2243 Beacon Avenue, Sidney

Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) All networks

National Station Improvement Programme. Uckfield Station Final report

SURVEY RESULTS: HOTEL AND HOSTEL GUESTS

BC Coastal Ferries Community Engagement, November December Engagement Summary Report February Kirk & Co. Consulting Ltd.

PUBLIC OPINION IN KOSOVO BASELINE SURVEY RESULTS NOVEMBER, 2010

2015 British Columbia Parks. Visitor Survey. Juan De Fuca Park. China Beach

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

The Economic Contribution of the International Cruise Industry in Canada

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

Metro Vancouver - Vancouver Island (June 26th, 2013 to September 2nd, 2013)

RESEARCH AND PLANNING FORT STEELE HERITAGE TOWN VISITOR STUDY 2007 RESULTS. May 2008

BC FERRIES BOARD APPROVES $325 MILLION IN CONTRACTS Flensburger Shipyard of Germany wins bid to build three Super C vessels

Regional Differences in International Airline Operating Economics: 2008 and 2009

National Station Improvement Programme. Halifax Station - Final report

Performance monitoring report for 2014/15

BREA. PO Box 955 Exton, PA ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF CRUISE TOURISM TO THE DESTINATION ECONOMIES

Tourism Kelowna Visitor Intercept Survey Findings by Season FINAL DRAFT REPORT

1999 Reservations Northwest Users Survey Methodology and Results November 1999

Metro Vancouver - Vancouver Island (April 1st, June 26th, 2012)

Civil Aviation Authority:

Methodology and coverage of the survey. Background

WILDERNESS AS A PLACE: HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF THE WILDERNESS EXPERIENCE

Tourism Kelowna Visitor Intercept Survey Findings FINAL DRAFT REPORT

Ferry Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes

National Rail Performance Report - Quarter /14

Cruise Pulse TM Travel Agent Panel Survey. Wave Season Kick-off Edition

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

REPORT. VisitEngland Business Confidence Monitor Wave 5 Autumn

Impacts of Visitor Spending on the Local Economy: George Washington Birthplace National Monument, 2004

Appendix 1: Operations Summary Report for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2017

CEREDIGION VISITOR SURVEY 2011 TOTAL SAMPLE. November 2011

2013/14 PUBLIC TRANSPORT PASSENGER SATISFACTION SURVEY

Railway performance and subsidy statistics

National Rail Passenger Survey Main Report Spring 2018

EUROPEANS EXPERIENCE WITH USING SHIPS AND PERCEPTIONS OF MARITIME SAFETY

National Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report. Autumn 2013 (wave 29)

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS

Transport Focus Train punctuality the passenger perspective. 2 March 2017 Anthony Smith, Chief Executive

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

2015 Metro User Christchurch

Analysis of Mode Switching Behavior of PUP Main Campus Students to Pasig River Ferry Service

Research: Lifting the Lid on Passenger Satisfaction Passenger Experience Conference, Hamburg, 2016

Perth & Kinross Council. Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016

2012 Mat Su Valley Collision Avoidance Survey

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results

Aviation Operating Administration/Executive

North & Central Coast (April 1st, June 25th, 2013)

National Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report. Spring 2014 (wave 30)

Visitor Services Project. Colonial National Historical Park

Competing in a Disrupted and Changing Environment

North & Central Coast (April 1st, June 26th, 2012)

Events Tasmania Research Program Hobart Baroque Festival

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP)

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

2007 SUNSHINE COAST VISITOR STUDY FINDINGS

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Transcription:

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report 0 British Columbia Ferry Services Inc. Presented to: British Columbia Ferry Services Inc. Victoria, British Columbia 0 05 West Second Avenue Vancouver BC V6H Y general@mustelgroup.com www.mustelgroup.com Tel 60.7. Fax 60.5.5

Contents Executive Overview... Background... Methodology... Findings... Key Conclusions... Detailed Findings... 5 Overall Satisfaction with BC Ferries... 6 Before Arriving at Terminal... Web site and Phone Contact... Highway Signage... At the Terminal... Overall Experience at the Terminal... Ticket Purchase... Food/Beverage Services at Terminal... Retail Services at Terminal... Foot Passenger Services... Other Terminal Services... 6 Onboard Experience... 7 Overall Onboard Experience... 7 Onboard Gift Shop/News Stand... Onboard Food Services... Onboard Washrooms and Onboard Seating... 0 Other Onboard Facilities/Services... Sailing Schedules... Various Aspects of Sailing Schedules... Departing on Time... Safety... Overall Value... 6 Appendices... 7 Route-by-Route Satisfaction Score for Each Attribute... 7 Research Methodology... Mustel Group Table of Contents

Executive Overview Background British Columbia Ferry Services Inc. (BC Ferries), conducts a Customer Satisfaction Tracking (CST) study each year. The CST study is designed to monitor customer satisfaction with various aspects of service on BC Ferries in order to determine areas that passengers believe are performing well and areas that require improvement. This study is part of a regular program of ongoing research conducted each year by BC Ferries. The following report provides annual customer satisfaction results for the following: Overall ferry service Service prior to arriving at the terminal Service at the ferry terminal Service onboard the ferry Service pertaining to loading/unloading Overall safety of operations, and Value for money of fares paid For each of the more than sixty attributes, the scores for the last four years are shown on the graphs, to allow for easy comparison. In addition to graphs showing the overall scores, the Appendix in this report includes detailed tables by route showing satisfaction scores for each of the service attributes for 0. The Appendix also includes detailed satisfaction scores for each of the terminal-related attributes, shown separately for each of the main terminals. Methodology The research involves a two-phased approach. First a random sample of passengers are intercepted onboard to collect key data including frequency of travel on BC Ferries, purpose of trip, area of residence, origin/destination, and standard demographic questions. Immediately following this screener, passengers are given a longer follow-up survey to complete after they disembark and leave the terminal area. Interviews are distributed across nine routes in total, both larger and smaller, during three different time periods: June, August and November. In 0, a total of,0 screeners were completed and, questionnaires returned. A more detailed explanation of the research design is included in the Research Methodology section, in the Appendix of this report. Mustel Group Page

Findings Customers were asked to rate their satisfaction with over sixty different aspects of the services they received from BC Ferries on a scale from to 5 where means very dissatisfied and 5 means very satisfied. Satisfaction with BC Ferries Overall A total of 5% of passengers in 0 reported to be satisfied overall with their experience travelling on BC Ferries. An overall score of. has been achieved (on a five-point scale where means very dissatisfied and 5 means very satisfied ). These findings represent a slight decrease from that recorded in 0 (.7 average score, 7% satisfied). Note that overall satisfaction levels have also declined in many passenger and demographic segments with frequent travellers (. down to.0) and the Gulf Island resident (.0 down to.6) more critical than others. Satisfaction before Arriving at Terminal Since the decline in satisfaction with the website and the on-line reservation system in 0, ratings for each service aspect have stabilised. Ratings are also consistent for usefulness of BC Ferries phone service and ease of using the automated phone service. Satisfaction at the Terminal Overall satisfaction with the experience at the terminal before boarding has diminished somewhat (% satisfied and an average score of.0 compared to 5% and.0 a year ago), with the decrease primarily at Tsawwassen (.0 down to.07 in 0). As in overall satisfaction, terminal average scores have also dipped in most passenger and demographic segments. Most notable are registered by business passengers (.6 down to.6) and Gulf Island residents (. down to.7). Satisfaction Onboard A total of 6% of passengers in 0 were satisfied with their overall experience onboard, for an overall rating of.07 on the 5-point scale, lower than the previous year (% and. average). The rating has dropped slightly on Route 5/ (.0 to.0) but significantly on Route (.07 to.7). Although satisfaction levels are also diminished from 0 on a few aspects of onboard services in many passenger and demographic segments, average scores remain consistent with previous measures. Mustel Group Page

Satisfaction with Sailing Schedules Satisfaction levels with most aspects of sailing schedules decreased in 0. Noteworthy is the ability to connect with other sailings, changing from an overall.5 average down to.05 this year, as well as the rating for on-time departures on Route which has declined from. to.6 this measure. Satisfaction with Safety Unchanged from 0 are perceptions of safety of ferry operations (.). Satisfaction with Overall Value The overall value for money for fares in 0 is an average of.76 this year, declining from. in 0. Mustel Group Page

Key Conclusions In summary, although customer satisfaction levels are consistent to the past year on most service aspects, decreases on all overall measures are registered in 0 with, value for money of fares the most notable decline. The key areas of success in 0 are in the following areas: Staff at the terminal and onboard All aspects of the ticket purchase Availability and cleanliness of terminal and onboard washrooms Cleanliness of pre-boarding and onboard lounge seating Appearance of terminals Variety/selection in onboard gift shop/ news stand Availability and cleanliness of seating area of onboard food/beverage services Availability of tourist and travel info Outside decks and overall appearance of vessels Procedures for loading and unloading Safety of ferry operations and loading/unloading Areas of opportunity to enhance the customer experience continue to include: Ease of using automated phone system Value for money of fares, parking, food/beverages, and retail merchandise both at the terminal and onboard Ability to connect Ferry sailing frequent enough Latest ferry late enough Mustel Group Page

Detailed Findings The following section shows the detailed findings from the study. It graphically displays the satisfaction scores for each of the 6 service attributes, showing both the average satisfaction score out of 5 as well as the percentage for each level of satisfaction, that is, Very Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Neither Satisfied/Dissatisfied, Satisfied and Very Satisfied. The ratings are shown for all surveyed BC Ferry routes combined and, where appropriate, the route-by-route scores are shown as well. NOTE: When route numbers are shown in the graphs, please refer to the following table that explains each route number. Ferry Routes Included in Customer Satisfaction Survey - 0 Route No. Route Route Route Route 0 Route Route Route 5/ Description of Route Tsawwassen-Swartz Bay Horseshoe Bay-Departure Bay Horseshoe Bay-Langdale Tsawwassen-Duke Point Swartz Bay-Fulford Harbour, Salt Spring Island Departure Bay Descanso Bay, Gabriola Island Southern Gulf Islands (from Swartz Bay/from Tsawwassen) Mustel Group Page 5

Overall Satisfaction with BC Ferries A total of 5% of passengers in 0 reported to be satisfied overall with their experience travelling on BC Ferries, resulting in an average score of.. These findings represent a slight decrease from that recorded in 0 (.7 average score, 7% satisfied). The overall satisfaction scores have been stable by route except levels have weakened on Route (.6 average score, versus. in 0). [NOTE: Refer to page 5 for route number codes] Mustel Group Page 6

Overall Satisfaction Level with Recent Experience Travelling with BC Ferries (%) All BC Ferries Routes 6 6 5 5 5 5 5...7. Route 0 5 50 50 5 5 5 7 6...0. Route 6 5. 5.07.0.07 Route 0 7 5 5 5 5 6 6.0..6. Route 0 7 6 5 5 5 7 7....6 Route 5 7 7 5 5 50.... Route 6 7. 6 50 7 5.. 6.6 Route 5/ 0.07...0 Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) How satisfied or dissatisfied were you, overall, with your recent experience travelling with BC Ferries? Mustel Group Page 7

The following chart summarizes the results from overall measures of each main point of contact and specifically with BC Ferries staff. There are decreases in overall terminal experience before boarding and onboard overall, however performance ratings remain stable on all other measures. Summary of Main Satisfaction Scores (%) Overall experience at terminal before boarding 7 5.07 6 5.0 6 5.0 5.0 Overall experience onboard the ferry 6 6 6 6.. 6. 6.07 Safety of Ferry operations 0 5.7 5.7 5.0 0 5. Professionalism of terminal staff.6.7.. Professionalism of onboard staff 0 5 5.. 5. 5. Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Mustel Group Page

Before Arriving at Terminal Web site and Phone Contact Since the decline in satisfaction with the website and the on-line reservation system in 0, ratings for each service aspect have stabilised. Ratings are also consistent for usefulness of BC Ferries phone service and ease of using the automated phone service. Satisfaction with Aspects of Website* and Phone Contact** (%) Usefulness of BC Ferries Web site 0 7.0.. 0. Ease of using on-line reservations 7 6 6 6 5 5.7. 7. 6 6. Usefulness of BC Ferries phone service 0 0 7 6 5 6..5 7.6 6 6. Ease of using automated phone system 7.0..7 7. Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. * 6% usage web site, % for on-line reservations ** % usage phone service, % for automated system Mustel Group Page

Highway Signage The overall rating for highway signage is down slightly in 0 (.5) with Langdale registering the lowest average terminal score (.7). Satisfaction with Highway Signage* (%) Total Passengers 5.. 6 5. Departure Terminals 5 5.5 Tsawwassen 5.05.6 5.0 5. Swartz Bay 0..6.6 6 7. Horseshoe Bay. 0 6 7.6 5 7. 5 7. Departure Bay 5 5. 5. 50 5. 0 50 6. Langdale 5 5. 5..6 6 7.7 Duke Point Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. * Usage: 7% 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied ().0.0.0. Mustel Group Page

At the Terminal Overall Experience at the Terminal Overall satisfaction with the experience at the terminal before boarding has diminished somewhat (% satisfied and an average score of.0 compared to 5% and.0 a year ago), with the decrease primarily at Tsawwassen (.0 down to.07 in 0). Overall Satisfaction with Experience at the Terminal Before Boarding (%) Total Passengers Major Terminals Tsawwassen 7 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5.07.0.0.0..7.0.07 Swartz Bay 6 6 60.0.6.. Horseshoe Bay 0 0 60 6 6 7.0.6..5 Departure Bay 5 7 5 6 6 5 7.0..0. Langdale 6 66 6 7 7 5.5.6.. Duke Point 6 6 6 6 5 5 5.07..06.07 Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Mustel Group Page

Ticket Purchase Satisfaction levels continue to be high with all aspects of the ticket purchase process, with average ratings similar to a year ago. Satisfaction with Aspects of Ticket Purchase (%) Efficiency of the transaction 5. 50 5. 5.5 50. Staff courtesy 50 6. 5 5. 5.6 5 0 5. Clarity of staff directions 6 6 6.5 5. 50 6.0 6. Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Mustel Group Page

Food/Beverage Services at Terminal Satisfaction levels with food and beverage services offered at terminals also continue to be stable, but note that the average rating for food/beverage value for money has worsened at Langdale (from.6 to.). Satisfaction with Aspects of Food and Beverage Services at Terminal* (%) Food/beverages offered 6 6 5..5 6.6 6 7.60 Value for money.. 0 0.0 0. Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. * 5% usage overall; excluding Route. Mustel Group Page

Retail Services at Terminal Satisfaction ratings with respect to the gift shop/news stand services and outdoor market area at the terminals in terms of variety/selection of merchandise has decreased slightly, with the Tsawwassen terminal registering the largest drop (.0 down to.7). Retail value for money at this terminal has also diminished from 0 (.50 to.). Satisfaction with Aspects of Retail Services at Terminal* (%) Gift Shop/News Stand at the Terminal - variety/selection of merchandise 5 50 5..7 5.6 5 6.0 Value for money 7 5.5 5.0 0 5. 6.6 Outdoor Market Area at the Terminal - variety/selection of merchandise 6.5. 6.5.5 Value for money 6. 7 6.0 0. 6 0 5. Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. * Usage: 6% gift shop, % outdoor market; excluding Route. Mustel Group Page

Foot Passenger Services Slight decreases are recorded this year for foot passenger experience at the terminal before boarding in terms of ease of using the drop-off/pick up area, availability of parking spaces and parking value for money. Satisfaction with Foot Passenger Services (%) Cleanliness of pre-boarding lounge 5 6 5 5 6 6 0..0.0. Availability of seating in pre-boarding lounge 0 5 5.6.7.70.6 Ease of using passenger drop-off/ pick-up area 6 6 50 5 5 7.7... Availability of parking spaces 5 50 7 6 5.77.67.7.6 Comfort of seating in pre-boarding lounge at terminal 6 6 7 50 5 7.60.67.6.65 Parking value for money 7 7 7 6..6.5.76 Usefulness of TV info screens* Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Usage: % are foot passengers (including bus). * Excludes Routes & 5/. 7 7 6 7 7 Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () 5 5.7.7.7.75 Mustel Group Page

Other Terminal Services Aside from a decrease in satisfaction for announcements at the terminal, levels have been stable on all other terminal services. Satisfaction with Other Terminal Services (%) Professionalism of terminal staff.6.7.. Availability of washrooms 6 6 6 6.07.07.07.06 Procedures for loading 6 6 60 60 5 6.0.06.06.05 Announcements when you need to be informed 6 7 7 7 7.76.7..77 Cleanliness of washrooms 5 5 5 6 5.0.00.. Clarity of public address system 50 50 0 0 0...5. Overall look and décor inside the terminal* * Excludes Route 0 7 5 0..6.. Outside appearance of the terminal you left from 5 60 6 6.0.0.06.0 Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Mustel Group Page 6

Onboard Experience Overall Onboard Experience A total of 6% of passengers in 0 were satisfied with their overall experience onboard, for an overall rating of.07 on the 5-point scale, lower than the previous year (% and. average). Onboard satisfaction by route has dropped significantly on Route and slightly on the SGI routes (5/). [NOTE: Refer to page 5 or page for Route number codes] Overall Satisfaction with Onboard Experience (%) All BC Ferries Routes 6 6 6 6 6 6....07 Route 7 6 6 6 6 5 7.... Route 6 67 65 66..07..0 Route 7 6 65 70 65.07.0.0. Route 0 7 7 6 65 6 60 6...6. Route 0 0 65 6 6 6 6 6.0.00.0.0 Route 0 5 6 6 65 7 6..0.0.7 Route 5/ Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. 0 6 67 6 6 Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied ().0.05.0.0 Mustel Group Page 7

Onboard Gift Shop/News Stand Satisfaction ratings continue to be stable on different aspects of the onboard gift shop/news stand. Satisfaction with Aspects of Gift Shop/News Stand Onboard* (%) Staff courtesy.7 5. 5.. Variety/selection of merchandise 5 5 6.0.0 5.05 5 6.00 Value for money.6.. 5. Ease of moving around inside shop 7 50 7..6 6.6 7 7.5 Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. * Excludes Routes &. Usage: % gift shop/news stand. Mustel Group Page

Onboard Food Services Also stable are satisfaction levels with onboard food services. Satisfaction with Aspects of Food and Beverage Services Onboard* (%) Staff courtesy.0 5...0 Cleanliness of seating area 6. 65.0 6.05 6.07 Availability of seating 6.06 6.0 60.05 6 60.06 Comfort of seating 0. 5 5.6.6 0 5.7 Length of time in line for food service 5 5.6.6.6.5 Food/beverage offered 5. 0.60 0.65 5.6 Value for money 6 6. 6 7. Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. 7 7 6.. * Excludes Routes &. Usage: 7% food & beverage services. Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Mustel Group Page

Onboard Washrooms and Onboard Seating Ratings for availability and cleanliness of washrooms have been stable. Furthermore, ratings are also relatively unchanged for onboard seating. Satisfaction with Onboard Washrooms (%) Availability of washrooms 6. 65.0 6. 6. Cleanliness of washrooms 6.0 6. 6.00 60 5. Comfort of indoor lounge seating 5 6 5 5.. 6.0 6 5.7 Cleanliness of indoor lounge seating area 7 6 65.. 7 6. 6 6. Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Mustel Group Page 0

Other Onboard Facilities/Services Once more, there are no significant changes to report with respect to other onboard facilities and services. Satisfaction with Other Facilities/Services Onboard (%) Professionalism of onboard staff 0 5 5 5 5.... Outside decks 0 6 66 6 6.0.00.0. Availability of tourist and travel information 5 60 5 5 6.0.0.00.0 Procedures for unloading 0 6 6 6 6.6... Ease of finding facilities/ services 7 6 7 6 6 6 6 6.... Atmosphere/environment 6 6 6 6 6 7 0...6.5 Announcements when you need to be informed 0 5 5 5 60 6 6 6 5 5 5..7..7 Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Mustel Group Page

Satisfaction with Other Facilities/Services Onboard (cont'd) (%) Outside appearance of the vessel overall 6 5.0.7 60.00 0 60.7 Play area for children*.7 * Excludes Routes &. 7.6 6 7.6 7 5. Work stations* 7 5 6.76 * Excludes Routes &. 6. 7.76. Clarity of public address system 6 6 5 7.7.7 7 5.7 5.70 Video arcade* * Excludes Routes &. 6 5 6.6. 7 0 7 5. 5 7 7. Ease of access for people with disabilities 50 5 0.7.7.70 5 7.75 Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Mustel Group Page

Sailing Schedules Various Aspects of Sailing Schedules Ratings with most aspects of sailing schedules diminished in 0, most notably the ability to connect with other sailings (.5 in 0 down to.05). Satisfaction with Sailing Schedules (%) Earliest ferry early enough 5 5.5 5.0 5.0 6 6. Ferry departing on time 5. 6 5..0 6 5.7 Ability to get on to desired sailing 5 6..0 5.5 5 5.76 Ferry sailing frequent enough 5 7.6 6 6.5 7 6 7 6.5 6 6.0 Latest ferry late enough 6. 0.5 5.5.5 Ability to connect with other sailings* * Based on total connecting to another ferry (n=). 5 6 0 7...5 6.05 Q.5) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Mustel Group Page

Departing on Time The following chart details the ratings for departing on time by route. This year ratings have fallen on Route 5/ and most notably on Route, declining from. last measure to.6 in 0. [NOTE: Refer to page 5 or page for Route number codes] Satisfaction with "Departing on Time" (%) Total Passengers 5. 6 5 6 5..0.7 Route.07 5 5. 5.05 5.05 Route 6 5. 5 7.5 7 6.7.76 Route 5. 7.6 0.06. Route 0 5. 5.07 5.05 5 5.0 Route.75 7 7.6 5 5.00.7 Route 0.7 5 7 6 7 5.5. 6.6 Route 5/ 0 6.0 0.6 5. 6 6 7 5.5 Q.5) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Mustel Group Page

Safety Perceptions of safety of ferry operations are consistent to the past year. Satisfaction with Aspects of Safety of Ferry Operations (%) Safety of ferry operations 0 5.7 5.7 5.0 0 5. Safety of loading/unloading 0 5. 60. 5.0 5. Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.5) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Mustel Group Page

Overall Value The overall value for money for fares in 0 has declined to a.76 average satisfaction score, down from. in 0. Satisfaction with Overall Value (%) Value for money of fares 7.. 7 6. 7.76 Very satisfied (5) Satisfied () Neither satisfied/dissatisfied () Dissatisfied () Very dissatisfied () Q.5) Please rate how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with each of the following. Mustel Group Page 6

Appendices Route-by-Route Satisfaction Score for Each Attribute Ferry Routes Included in Customer Satisfaction Survey - 0 Route No. Route Route Route Route 0 Route Route Route 5/ Description of Route Tsawwassen-Swartz Bay Horseshoe Bay-Departure Bay Horseshoe Bay-Langdale Tsawwassen-Duke Point Swartz Bay-Fulford Harbour, Salt Spring Island Departure Bay Descanso Bay, Gabriola Island Southern Gulf Islands (from Swartz Bay/from Tsawwassen) NOTE: Combined, these routes represent approximately 0% of the annual passenger traffic volume on BC Ferries. Mustel Group Page 7

Satisfaction Ratings by Route All Waves 0 (See page 7 for Route Number Codes) Larger Routes Smaller Routes Route Total Total 0 Total 5/ OVERALL EXPERIENCE Trip overall..0..07.6....6.0 BEFORE ARRIVING AT TERMINAL Usefulness of BC Ferries website....7...0..7.0 Ease of using on-line reservations..5.00..7.5.5..6.5 Usefulness of BC Ferries phone service..6.7.5.5....70.6 Ease of using automated phone service..0..6..6..7.7. Highway signage.5.0.0..00.7..0.5.76 TERMINAL EXPERIENCE Terminal overall.0.0..0.0...0.66.0 Outside appearance of the terminal.0...0.06.7...65.06 Ticket Purchase Efficiency of the transaction..6....6..7.7.6 Staff courtesy..7...50....0. Clarity of staff directions......6.... Food & Beverage Services at the Terminal Food beverages offered.60.67.7.5.65.6.7. -.0 Value for money..6..07...0. -.06 Gift Shop/ News Stand at the Terminal Variety/ selection of merchandise.0..7...5..6 -.6 Value for money.6.6..6.7.0..5 -. Outdoor Market Area at the Terminal Variety/ selection of merchandise.5..5.5.70... -. Value for money..5.5....5.6 -. Other Terminal Services Clarity of public address system..5.5.6.65...65.07.5 Announcements when you need to be informed.77..0..5.6.6.7.7.70 Overall look & décor inside terminal......75.7.75 -. Availability of washrooms.06.0..0.6.0..0.76. Cleanliness of washrooms..0.0.5......0 Procedures for loading.05...06.6...05.0.0 Professionalism of terminal staff...7...07..7.6. continued Mustel Group Page

Foot Passenger Services at the Terminal Satisfaction Ratings by Route All Waves 0 (See page 7 for Route Number Codes) Larger Routes Smaller Routes Route Total Total 0 Total 5/ Usefulness of TV info screens.7.7.0.7..6.5.5 -.6 Availability of parking spaces.6..0.6.07...6.05.6 Parking value for money..6.7...6.77.7.75. Ease of using passenger drop-off/ pick-up area.5....0..5.7.. Availability of seating in pre-boarding lounge at terminal Comfort of seating in pre-boarding lounge at terminal.6.66..65.0.0.6.0...6.6.7.60.5.6..75..77 Cleanliness of pre-boarding lounge...7.7.0..6..67. ONBOARD EXPERIENCE Onboard overall.07...0....0.7.0 Gift Shop/ News Stand Variety/ selection of merchandise.00.0.00.0...7 - -.7 Staff courtesy.....0..6 - -.6 Ease of moving around inside shop.5.60.65.7.6..6 - -.6 Value for money..7....0.7 - -.7 Food Services Length of time in line for food services.5.5..5.7.5.70 - -.70 Food/ beverages offered.6.67.6.6.70.7. - -. Staff courtesy.0.0.0.7..6. - -. Availability of seating.06.05.0.0.0..0 - -.0 Comfort of seating.7...7.0..77 - -.77 Cleanliness of seating area.07.06.0.0.6..6 - -.6 Value for money....6.6.0. - -. Washrooms Availability of washrooms......06...77.0 Cleanliness of washrooms..0.06..0...5.77.0 Lounge Seating Comfort of indoor lounge seating.7.0.0..0.0.6..7.7 Cleanliness of indoor lounge seating area.......7..76. continued... Mustel Group Page

Other Onboard Facilities/ Services Satisfaction Ratings by Route All Waves 0 (See page 7 for Route Number Codes) Larger Routes Smaller Routes Route Total Total 0 Total 5/ Play area for children..5.6.5.5.60. - -. Video arcade...0.6.5.5.5 - -.5 Work stations..50...6.6.75 - -.75 Outside decks..0.07.00.0...5.6.5 Outside appearance of the vessel overall.7.0.0..07.5..5.7. Availability of tourist and travel information.0.0..0.06.5.0...0 Ease of access, overall, for people with disabilities.75..0.75..60.7.7.0. Ease of finding facilities/ services.....6..0..6.0 Clarity of public address system.70.75.6.7..7..76..5 Announcements when you need to be informed.7....00..6.6..5 Atmosphere/ environment.5.00.0.6.06.0.75...0 Procedures for unloading..06....5..00.66.7 Professionalism with onboard staff...7..6.....6 Experience with the Sailing Schedule Earliest ferry earliest enough....07.00..7.0.5.77 Latest ferry late enough.5.6.6.5.70.0...0.50 Ferry sailing frequent enough.0.6.75.5..5.6.5..0 Ability to get onto desired ferry.76.7.5.77.5.50...7. Ability to connect with other sailings (based on those connecting).05....7.70.6.5.7. Ferry departing on time.7.5.05.76.0...7.6.5 Safety Safety of ferry operations...6.6..07...05. Safety of loading/unloading......07...05. OVERALL VALUE Value for money of fares.76...77.67.6.6.0..70 Mustel Group Page 0

OVERALL EXPERIENCE TERMINAL ATTRIBUTES ONLY - Satisfaction Ratings by Terminal - All Waves 0 - Total Tsawwassen Swartz Bay Terminals Horseshoe Bay Departure Bay Langdale Trip overall..6..0.07.6.6 TERMINAL EXPERIENCE Terminal overall.0.07..5...07 Outside appearance of the terminal.0.0...0..0 Ticket Purchase Efficiency of the transaction..7..... Staff courtesy..6.5.7..7.50 Clarity of staff directions...5.0.5.6.7 Food & Beverage Services at the Terminal Food beverages offered.60.7.7..6..5 Value for money....... Gift Shop/ News Stand at the Terminal Variety/ selection of merchandise.0.7.5.7.77..6 Value for money.6.....0.6 Outdoor Market Area at the Terminal Variety/ selection of merchandise.5..5.7.5..6 Value for money.....5.6.6 Other Terminal Services Clarity of Public address system..7.6.5.6.. Announcements when you need to be informed.77.7.6.7..7. Overall look & décor inside terminal....7.06.7. Usefulness of TV info screens.7.7..6.7.5. Availability of washrooms.06.06..... Cleanliness of washrooms..0.0.7.06.. Procedures for loading.05.0..6... Professionalism of terminal staff...0..7.0.0 Foot Passenger Services at the Terminal Availability of parking spaces.6.0.0.6.0.6.7 Parking value for money..7.7.7.7..0 Ease of using passenger drop-off/ pick-up area.5.0....5.0 Availability of seating in pre-boarding lounge at terminal Comfort of seating in pre-boarding lounge at terminal Duke Point.6..7..5.7..6.70.70.5...0 Cleanliness of pre-boarding lounge...0.0.6.. OVERALL VALUE Value for money of fares.76.77.0.7.6.67.7 Mustel Group Page

Research Methodology Background British Columbia Ferry Services Inc. (BC Ferries) has commissioned tracking research to gauge customer satisfaction on specific BC Ferries Routes to determine and monitor areas of service that patrons believe are performing favourably and areas requiring improvement. Ultimately, this research will contribute to product and service enhancements for an improved service for BC Ferries travellers. Project Overview The 00 Customer Satisfaction Tracking Study acted as a baseline for the newly formed B.C. Ferry Services Inc. and was designed to track performance on satisfaction levels overall and with specific service attributes. Once a year, the annual satisfaction scores will be published on the BC Ferries web site as required by the Coastal Ferry Services Contract. The study is designed to provide input to the Corporate Strategic Plan and to regular service and marketing plans. Research Objectives The specific objectives are as follows: Determine BC Ferries customers satisfaction levels overall with BC Ferries service, Determine satisfaction with the specific attributes of the service, Uncover the relative importance of attributes, Measure satisfaction with attributes that span the entire range of points of customer contact with BC Ferries, Track changes in satisfaction over time, and across customer segments, Identify the critical improvements to the current service offering that will have the greatest impact on customer satisfaction, Ensure the tracking research is relevant and credible enough to pass internal and external scrutiny. Mustel Group Page

Quantitative Tracking Research First, a random sample of passengers was intercepted onboard to collect key screener data including frequency of travel on BC Ferries, purpose of trip, area of residence, origin/destination, and standard demographic questions. Each questionnaire also included coding of the route, the departure time, location of interview, the vessel name and any other information of value for analysis. This information was collected in the form of a batch header, which was attached to all the screeners completed on each sailing. Immediately following this screener, passengers are given a longer follow-up survey to complete after they disembark and leave the terminal area. The completed survey is returned in a postage pre-paid envelope. Respondents are instructed to complete the survey within hours of receiving it to ensure top-of-mind experiences are recorded. This self-administered portion of the survey was designed to capture satisfaction and usage information from all potential points of contact for the last trip from initial information requests, access to terminal, and ticket sales, to onboard, disembarking and post-travel experience. It included: an overall satisfaction measure service/facility attribute satisfaction ratings expenditure data problems encountered and responsiveness of personnel in resolving problems suggested changes or additions that would enhance the experience The survey instrument was designed in full consultation with BC Ferries. Mustel Group Page

Sample Size The total sample of placements was disproportionately distributed across larger and smaller routes to ensure a minimum number of interviews per route for reliability. Routes surveyed and the number of screeners and completed returned surveys from each route during this measure are as follows: All Waves 0 Screeners Returns Route : Tsawwassen-Swartz Bay,65 6 Route : Horseshoe Bay-Departure Bay,0 7 Route : Horseshoe Bay-Langdale, 5 Route 0: Tsawwassen-Duke Point, 70 Route : Swartz Bay-Fulford Harbour, Saltspring Island, 0 Route : Departure Bay Descanso Bay, Gabriola Island,0 5 Route 5/: Southern Gulf Islands, TOTAL,0, Sample Validation and Weighting The data was weighted to bring them into their correct proportions, based on known statistics for the field period. Data was weighted to match actual passenger distribution: within each wave, by routes selected for surveying, within each route by daypart, within each route by weekday and weekend traffic, and by known BC Ferries traffic volume by wave The weighting procedures have been professionally scrutinized and approved by a professional statistician specializing in transportation research. Mustel Group Page

The table following outlines the actual and weighted distributions of the sample. Actual & Weighted Distribution of the Sample All Waves 0 Weekend Actual (,) % Screeners Weighted (,) % Actual (,5) % Returns Weighted (,5) % Route: 5 5 Weekday 6 6 6 5 0 5/ 6 6 Route: 0 6 7 7 7 5/ 5 Mustel Group Page 5

Data Collection The interviewers for this study were personal intercept staff who have completed rigorous training and are experienced with general public studies as well as business-to-business studies. A detailed briefing of interviewing staff was attended by the field director, supervisory staff and the project director. So that a proper representation of ferry travellers was interviewed, interviewers were trained in the following techniques and randomization procedures, which were strictly adhered to: Passengers were approached as soon as they were seated and where necessary, minimum age verified ( years and over). An interview with every 5th person was attempted. Passengers in small as well as large groups were approached; respondents were instructed to complete the survey individually, not as a group. All areas of the vessel were covered - cafeteria, snack bar, all lounge areas, outer decks and vehicle; interviewers moved to each of these areas every minutes on major routes and every 5 minutes on minor routes. Both foot and vehicle passengers were approached. Where possible, and to correct for inherent bias of foot to vehicle passengers (foot passengers are first on and last off), interviewing was conducted on parking decks with vehicle passengers after the announcement signaling arrival to port Interviewers were instructed not to accommodate patrons requesting a survey; however, if individuals were persistent a specially marked copy was provided allowing for its removal from the total. Data Analysis Senior coding staff was briefed on relevant information and nuances. Categories for open-end responses were developed under the guidance of the senior researcher and verification was performed by the coding supervisor. The data entry system used for this study includes an internal edit, which is custom programmed. This immediate verification during the data entry process reduces entry errors and a further more detailed computer edit is performed after entry of the data. For standard cross-tabulations, software designed expressly for marketing research was employed. Special editing and cleaning features of this database package ensure that the records are data entered and coded with accuracy. Further rigorous checks for inherent logic and consistency were performed prior to data tabulation. Mustel Group Page 6

Response Rate The following outlines the response rates achieved in 0. Response Rates All Waves 0 Route % Route 0% Route % Route 0 5% Route % Route % Route 5/ % Overall response % Overall, the tolerance limits for this measure at the 5% level of confidence, based on the most conservative case (i.e., a statistic of 50%) are as follows: Tolerance Limits All Waves 0 Approximate Actual Tolerance Limits Sample Size % Points Total Screeners,0 +/-.0 % Total Returns, +/-.5 % Individual Route Returns Route 6 +/-.% Route 7 +/-.% Route 5 +/-.% Route 0 70 +/-.7% Route 0 +/-.7% Route 5 +/-.% Route 5/ +/-.% Mustel Group Page 7