Regulation 261/2004 denied boarding, cancellation and delay. Italian experience

Similar documents
The European Commission's Proposal to Amend EU Regulation 261/2004. by Arpad Szakal

APRA RECCOMENDATIONS ON

ADR In the Aviation Sector and the Sector of Tour Operators

PROPOSED REGULATION OF JCAR CONSUMER PROTECTION

CIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENT SECTION 3 AIR TRANSPORT SERIES X PART I 1 June, 2008 Effective : FORTHWITH

Revision of the Third Air Package

Suggestions for a Revision of Reg 261/2004 Michael Wukoschitz, Austria

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CANCELLATION AND LONG DELAY UNDER EU REGULATION 261/2004

luxaviation S.A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS

Summary of stakeholder consultation on the possible revision of Regulation 261/2004

GHANA CIVIL AVIATION (ECONOMIC)

RECOMMENDATION ECAC/16-1 AIR CARRIERS LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO PASSENGERS

General Transport Terms and Conditions

Summary of the rights of passengers travelling by bus and coach 1

Consumer Protection Workshop. Brasilia, 25 August 2016

3.1. Unless otherwise agreed between INFLITE and the Charterer and specified in the Charter Booking Confirmation, normal terms of payment will be:

Nepal s Accession to the Montreal Convention and its Applicable

Flight Regularity Administrative Regulations

ECC-Net involvement in Air Passenger Rights. Bianca Schulz, ECC France Stakeholder conference on Air Passenger Rights, Brussels, 30 May 2012

AGREEMENT BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA FOR AIR SERVICES

What constitutes a passenger under the Montreal Convention?

LaudaMotion GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS (GTCB) VERSION OF LAUDAMOTION GMBH

NO COMPENSATION PAYMENTS PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EC) No. 261/2004 IN CASE OF STRIKES?

Bas Jacob Adriaan Krijgsman v Surinaamse Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (Case C-302/16)

CONTRACT OF TRANSPORTATION

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.

STATUS OF MONTENEGRO WITH REGARD TO INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW INSTRUMENTS

Changes in passenger rights

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 22 November 2012 *

PEOPIL & McGILL CONFERENCE

Air Passengers Rights

Report on Passenger Rights Complaints for year ended 31 st December th December 2011

EU Air Passenger Rights

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 10 July 2008

European Air Law Association 23rd Annual Conference

Functioning and application of established rights of people travelling by air

Aviation Law. Michael J. Holland. Condon & Forsyth LLP -- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Official Journal of the European Union L 46/1. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Trains, planes, cars and boats. What you should know

Passenger Rights Complaints in 2015

CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT

General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) Customer Protection Rights Regulation

Air Law, Regulation and Compliance Management

Regulations and Contracts

STATUS OF GERMANY WITH REGARD TO INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW INSTRUMENTS

International Civil Aviation Organization WORLDWIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE (ATCONF) SIXTH MEETING. Montréal, 18 to 22 March 2013

operator's guide to passenger rights for regular services longer than 250km

British Airways PLC. Agreement to Supply Group Nett Rates. Terms and Conditions

A Europe for all passengers

Implementation at National level. Laura Fiumara Gent, 4 July 2018

Official Journal of the European Union L 7/3

Corina van der Lans v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (Case C-257/14)

INTERNATIONAL REGULATION OF AIR CARRIAGE

EU Air Safety List: Questions and answers on air carriers subject to an operating ban in the EU

Air Passenger Rights Revision - Frequently Asked Questions

Airports and Airlines Winter Operations Economic Policy Aspects. Narjess Teyssier Chief Economic Analysis & Policy Section

General Terms and Conditions of FlyingBag Service

AFRICAN AIR TRANSPORT AND THE PROTECTON OF THE CONSUMER

IATA LEGAL SYMPOSIUM February 2011 Vancouver, Canada. EU Passenger Rights Update

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Eighth Chamber) 7 September 2017 (*)

Audit brief. Passenger rights in the EU

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Facilities to be provided to passengers by airlines due to denied boarding, cancellation of flights and delays in flights.

COURTESY TRANSLATION ORDINANCE (PORTARIA) 303-A / 2004

Conditions of Carriage

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.

VIII CONFERENCE ON AIRPORT LAW ORGANISED BY THE WORLD WIDE AIRPORT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION AND ATHENS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ATHENS, SEPTEMBER 2015

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS WASHINGTON, D.C.

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF NOV A SCOTIA DANIEL JOSEPH SERGE LACHANCE. -and- AIR CANADA DEFENDANT AIR CANADA'S PLEA

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

7615/13 GL/ne 1 DG E 2 A

STATUS OF SERBIA WITH REGARD TO INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW INSTRUMENTS

Passenger rights: what passengers with reduced mobility need to know when travelling by air

LJN: BN2126,Subdistrict section Court in Haarlem, / CV EXPL

Report on Air Passenger Rights Complaints for the period 1 st January to 30 th June th October 2009

7615/13 ADD 2 GL/ne 1 DG E 2 A

Undertakings provided to CAA under Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002

Claudia Wegener v Royal Air Maroc SA (Case C-537/17)

Final Rule, Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections

BILATERAL TEMPLATE AIR SERVICES AGREEMENT

General Conditions of Carriage for Passengers and Baggage

TREATY SERIES 2007 Nº 73

P7_TA(2014)0092 Compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights ***I

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA RELATING TO AIR SERVICES New Delhi, 25 January 1978

Airline Subsides: Can the Law Play a Role in Regulating Them?

Aircraft Leasing. United Kingdom Overseas Territories Aviation Circular OTAC Issue 1 7 October Effective: on issue

Unfair terms in air transport contracts

The Regulation Works! An analysis of the Impact Assessment On Proposal for the Amendment of Regulation 261/2004 on Air Passengers Rights

Prices shown are in U.S. dollars based on rates in effect at the time of booking and are subject to change without notice.

Brussels, C(2016) 3502 final COMMISSION NOTICE

ASSEMBLY 35TH SESSION

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 12 May 2011 (*)

GUYANA CIVIL AVIATION REGULATION PART X- FOREIGN OPERATORS.

REVISION OF REG. 1371/2007 ON RAIL PASSENGERS RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS: THE POSITION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT OPERATORS AND ORGANISING AUTHORITIES

1.3. For questions of interpretation, if any version is available in another language, the English version alone shall be binding. 2.

Your essential guide to air travel

9820/1/14 REV 1 GL/kl 1 DGE 2 A

Aeronautical Prices and Terms and Conditions

Transcription:

Regulation 261/2004 denied boarding, cancellation and delay Italian experience BRUSSELS, 22 OCTOBER 2010 HOTEL BRISTOL STEPHANIE WWW.STUDIOPIERALLINI.IT

Legislation - Italian Law no. 12 dated as of 10 January 2004, ratifying the Montreal Convention dated as of 28 May 1999 ( Convention for the unification of certain rules for international carriage by air ), which governs liability of air carriers for death of, injury to, passengers and loss or damage to baggage or cargo in respect of domestic carriage. Montreal Convention entered into force in Italy on the 60 th day (28 June 2004) after the 30 ratification (article 56,paragraph 6), as implemented and integrated by EU Regulation no. 889/2002 dated as of 13 May 2002. - Italian Legislative Decree no. 206 dated as of 6 September 2005 (so called Consumer Code ), implementing the Directive 29/2005/EC on unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market.

- Articles 941 and subsequent of the Italian Navigation Code (as amended by Italian Legislative Decree no. 96 dated as of May 9, 2005). - EC Regulation no. 889/2002 dated as of 13 May 2002, amending Council Regulation (EC) no. 2027/1997 on air carrier liability in the event of accidents. EC Regulation no. 889/2002 reinforces the rules of the Montreal Convention on passengers and baggage transport and extends them to national transports of each State member of the Community. - EC Regulation no. 261/2004 dated as of 11 February 2004, providing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and cancellation or long delay of flights.

Italian Authorities competences on passengers protection Italian Civil Aviation Authority - ENAC ENAC is the Italian Civil Aviation Authority and the main body regulating aviation in Italy, as provided by article 687 of the Italian Navigation Code and Legislative Decree no. 250/97. In general, ENAC has competence for supervising air carriers and applying fines. In particular, ENAC is in charge for issuing fines to the airlines in breach of regulation 261/2004. ENAC issued the Passenger s Charter (namely, Carta dei Diritti del Passeggero ) and the Charter of Airport Standard Services. The Passenger s Charter is a practical vademecum of National, European and International regulation on air passengers protection, explaining the claims and compensation procedures available to passengers in case of non compliance with the above regulation. The Charter of Airport Standard Services sets out the minimum quality standards airport operators are bound to comply with in providing their services.

Italian Antitrust Authority (namely, Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato ) The Italian Antitrust Authority is an independent authority established by Law no. 287 dated as of 10 October 1990, having competence, inter alia, for preventing unfair commercial practices and advertising and for applying fines. As far as air transport market, the Authority has recently fined three Italian air carriers for unfair commercial practices concerning the splitting up of the tariff and the elements of cost which are reimbursable in case of flight s cancellation. In particular, the Authority has considered unfair the inclusion of the fuel surcharge into the category fees and airport charges during the flights booking process on-line, since it would be able to cause confusion for passengers with respect to fuel surcharge s reimbursement in case of flight s cancellation. The Authority has further considered unfair the practice related to the acceptance by the passenger of the insurance policy during the flights booking process on-line, given that this service was already pre-selected in the booking on-line system of the air carrier. As a consequence, consumers not interested in purchasing the service would be forced to an opt out.

Administrative Courts The Administrative Courts are (i) the Regional Administrative Court (namely, Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale ) and (ii) the Supreme Administrative Court (namely, Consiglio di Stato ). The Regional Administrative Court has jurisdiction upon ENAC s and Italian Antitrust Authority s decisions. The judgements issued by the Regional Administrative Court can be challenged before the Supreme Administrative Court. Italian Civil Courts and Judges Italian Civil Courts and Judges have jurisdiction upon passengers claims. In particular, claims exceeding 5,000.00 Euro are brought before the Civil Courts and claims below 5,000.00 Euro ( small claims ) fall into the competence of the Judges of Peace (namely, Giudici di Pace ). As far as the territorial competence, the Consumer Code provides the competence of the courts of passengers residence or domicile.

Italian experience on passengers claims - Most of the passengers claims fall into the competence of the Judges of Peace. Only passengers claims exceeding 5,000.00 Euro are brought before the Civil Courts. - The Judge of Peace generally (i) is not an expert in aviation matters, (ii) often applies the equity principle and (iii) is generally in favour of the consumers/passengers.

Distribution of the small passengers claims between the competence of the Judges of Peace and the Civil Courts

- In the proceedings, air carriers usually meet serious difficulties to satisfy the burden of proof, especially in order to prove events of force majeure and aircraft technical faults. Sometimes the documentation provided by the air carrier (for example, technical log) is not considered valuable by the judge, as difficult to understand. For this reason, witnesses are often necessary, but expensive for air carriers. - Often air carriers choose to settle claims with passengers for the following main reasons: (i) attitude of the judges to admit indemnification of the so called moral damages ; (ii) heavy burden of proof; (iii) high costs of defence before the courts of passengers residence or domicile.

Italian Experience - Judges of Peace have not the adequate experience to judge on aviation matter. - Attitude to condemn air carriers giving indemnification for both article 7 of the EC Regulation no. 261/2004 and moral damages. - Difficulties for air carrier in order to satisfy the burden of proof. - High costs of defense compared to the amount of the claims.

Impact of the judgement of the European Court of Justice on 19 November 2009 (Sturgeon) As everybody knows, by the recent judgement dated as of 19 November 2009 the ECJ: clarified the conditions whereby a delayed flight can be classified as cancelled flight within the meaning of EC Regulation no. 261/2004, underlining that a long delay is not sufficient to classify a flight as cancelled; extended the right to compensation provided by article 7 of EC Regulation no. 261/2004 to include passengers affected by a flight delay of at least three hours in arrival; stated that technical problems which come to light during maintenance of an aircraft or on account of failure to carry out such maintenance cannot constitute in themselves extraordinary circumstances.

Impact of the ECJ judgment on the Italian experience In the Italian experience, Sturgeon judgment has not had a significant impact so far as the judges used to recognize the passengers right to compensation in case of flight delay of three hours, or less, even before the ECJ judgment and, in any case, to indemnify passengers for both pecuniary and moral damages arising from flight delay on the basis of the provisions set forth by the Montreal Convention (which, as known, provides for higher limits of air carrier s liability) and/or on the basis of the general principles of law or equity provided by the Italian Civil Code and the Italian Navigation Code. Moreover, the extraordinary circumstances constituting an excusable delay were already restricted.

As far as the moral damages, the Italian Supreme Court (Joint Sections) has recently offered a new interpretation of law concerning the indemnification of the so called non pecuniary losses (judgment no. 26972 dated as of November 11, 2008), stating, inter alia, that such damages (including the moral damages) cannot be automatically recognized, but have to be both substantial and proven.

Measures taken by the Italian air carriers In Italy, air carriers are represented by the Italian Air Carriers Association (namely Associazione Nazionale Vettori e Operatori del Trasporto Aereo, Assaereo ). Assaereo exercises many functions in representation of the Italian air carries, following - inter alia - with ENAC the application of National, European and International regulation and monitoring changes and developments of the Italian case law in aviation industry. In July Assaereo has organized a conference where airlines, aviation authorities and consumers have discussed the passengers claims situation and common measures to be adopted.

Several proposals were considered of common interest: (i) setting up of specialized councils for small passengers claims resolution (ii) standard agreements approved by respective association of tour operators, handlers, travel agents and consumers, and standard conditions of transport; (iii) the revision of the insurance policies conditions.

Desirable amendments - Exclusion/revision of DBC rules for crisis situation. - Exclusion of the concurrence of compensation provided by article 7 and indemnification for moral damages. - Compensation must be proportional to the flight ticket s cost. - Possibility to re-route passenger by alternative means of transport.

- Clear distinction between cancellation and long delay and relevant consequences. - Clarify conflict/concurrent application/limit of DBC and damages according to International and national rules.