Metrobus Service Evaluations

Similar documents
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

GREENBELT-BWI THURGOOD MARSHALL AIRPORT EXPRESS LINE ROUTE B30

Background Information about the H Lines Evaluation

Metrobus Service Evaluation Study Bowie Lines Bowie State University (B21, 22) Bowie-Belair (B24, B25) Final Report June 2013

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

1. PREVIOUS STUDIES/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS... 1

Maximizing Transit Opportunities

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

Table of Contents. List of Tables

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

BaltimoreLink Implementation Status Report

CobbLinc Forward Service Package

Report by Finance Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

Chapter 5 Alternatives

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

About Washington, D.C.

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

October 12th 2015 DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

Table of Contents. List of Tables

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

7272 WISCONSIN AVENUE LOCAL AREA TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

Silver Line Operating Plan

SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT + SAN LUIS OBISPO RTA JOINT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS: SERVICE STRATEGIES. Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP; Principal

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon

A retrospective look at work program counting activities since 2001 is found in Table 8, on the last page of this document. Hours of Operation

Service Change Plan Cowichan Valley Regional Transit System July 2018 Expansion. Prepared by

Transit Vehicle Scheduling: Problem Description

CONGESTION REPORT 1 st Quarter 2018

Western Placer County Transit Operators Short Range Transit Plan Updates FY to FY Project Update and Alternatives Discussion

RULES AND REGULATIONS

METRO Orange Line Update Metro Transit, BRT/Small Starts Projects Christina Morrison & Natalie Westberg Transportation Committee July 10, 2017

MTA Bus Network Improvement Project July 22, 2013

B. Congestion Trends. Congestion Trends

Washington-Baltimore Regional Airport System Plan Ground Access Element Update

Draft SamTrans Service Plan Public Outreach Presentation

Word Count: 3,565 Number of Tables: 4 Number of Figures: 6 Number of Photographs: 0. Word Limit: 7,500 Tables/Figures Word Count = 2,250

DC Circulator Service Changes. Implementation Plan for June 24, 2018

Lessons Learned from Rebuilding the Muni Subway Schedule Leslie Bienenfeld

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

ROUTE 103. Morrisville Shopping Shuttle ROUTE OVERVIEW

Northern Beaches Transport Action Plan

5.1 Traffic and Transportation

SafeTrack Plan. FINAL/PUBLIC May 19, 2016

Juneau Comprehensive Operations Analysis and Transit Development Plan DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS January 2014

PLEASE READ Proposal for Sustainable Service

EXHIBIT 1. BOARD AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A JOINT DEVELOPMENT SOLICITATION

Memorandum. DATE: May 9, Board of Directors. Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director. Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program

Sarawia Street Laxon Terrace Rail Level Crossing Removal

2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary

Operational Performance

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014

CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan

Transit in Toronto. Chair Adam Giambrone Sunday, October

Northwest Corridor Transit Study

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

Potomac River Commuter Ferry Feasibility Study & RPE Results

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

ROUTE 110. St. Albans Downtown Shuttle ROUTE OVERVIEW

Development of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level and BRT Route Pattern Alternatives

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

ROUTE EVALUATION ROUTE 21 Denton County Transportation Authority

STEP ALTERNATIVES RANKING TABLE

New Qingdao Jiaodong International Airport Qingdao, China (TAO) Flight Path Analysis Preliminary Findings Report

Tier 2 Final Environmental Assessment I-66 Transit/TDM Technical Report. Appendix D. Existing Transit/TDM Provider Overviews

Like many transit service providers, the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Port Authority) uses a set of service level guidelines to determine

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

4. Proposed Transit Improvements

Metro EXTRA Service Plan. District of Columbia Rapid Bus Study. Georgia Avenue 7 th Street Corridor. November 2006

5 Rail demand in Western Sydney

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

Multimodal Planning Studies

Dulles Toll Road Rate Setting Process

REGISTERING YOUR ASSOCIATION STAY INFORMED ABOUT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS IN YOUR COMMUNITY

Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation Authority

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

2.0 Miami-Dade Transit System Overview

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

Tram Passenger Survey

North Shore Coordination Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #5 November 28, 2017

Investing in our local rail network June 2014

Outline. 1. Timetable Development 2. Fleet Size. Nigel H.M. Wilson. 3. Vehicle Scheduling J/11.543J/ESD.226J Spring 2010, Lecture 18

Chemainus-Thetis-Penelakut Ferry Advisory Committee Meeting

New free City connector bus service

Table E1 Summary of Annual Revenue Service Hours. System LTC Routes 581, , , , ,082 (Quick Start)

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

Kitsap Transit Board Workshop January 16, 2018

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

Public Meeting: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) Transportation Network Company (TNC) Lot on S. Eads Street

Request to Improve Transit along the Dufferin Street Corridor

CHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN 1

COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT (Lisa Belsanti, Director) (Joshua Schare, Public Information Officer)

Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013

Figure 4-37 Route 10: Ridership Type by Fare Category

Baltimore Ravens Egress Study

Report to the Dulles Corridor Advisory Committee

Montgomery Area Paratransit Guide

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN

Transcription:

Metrobus Service Evaluations Routes B30, 87-88, & 89-89M Public Meeting Laurel Library May 25, 2011 Ben Schumin

Purpose of the Evaluation Identify strategic needs; Review capacity, productivity, reliability, and quality of service; Recommend changes to improve service (frequency, crowding, travel time, amenities, communications, etc.)

Line Maps: B30, 87-88, & 89-89M B30 87-88 89-89M

Characteristics of Routes B30, 87-88, & 89-89M B30: Average number of weekday riders: 789 (42 nd of 53 routes in MD; 115 th of 157 routes overall) Average number of riders per trip: 17 Frequency of service: 40 minutes Express service 2 nd lowest subsidy of all Metrobus routes (i.e., fares covering operational costs) $0.62 per rider. 87-88: Average number of weekday riders: 785 (41 st of 53 routes in MD; 114 th of 157 routes overall) Average number of riders per trip: 22 Combined frequency of service: 20 minutes (weekday southbound), 30 minutes other times Very high subsidy per rider: $3.89. 89-89M: Average number of weekday riders: 852 (38 th of 53 routes in MD; 110 th of 157 routes overall) Average number of riders per trip: 26 Frequency of service: 89: 41-49 mins. AM peak 89: 34-61 mins. PM peak 89M: 60 minutes High subsidy per rider: $2.79.

Rider Survey - Preliminary Results B30: Top concerns: 1) Frequency of buses 2) Crowding on buses 3) Hours of service 4) Reliability of service 76% use B30 for trips to BWI; 22% use it to and from work 75% use B30 occasionally; 15% use it almost daily 67% transfer to/from Greenbelt Metro 40% of riders are DC residents; 37% live in MD 87-88: Top concerns: 1) Hours of service 2) Frequency of buses 3) Crowding on buses 4) Reliability of service 5) Travel time is too long 84% use the line to get to and from work Almost all riders surveyed use the line every day About half of riders transfer at Greenbelt Almost all respondents live in Maryland 89-89M: Top concerns: 1) Hours of service 2) Frequency of buses 3) Crowding on buses 4) Reliability of service 5) Location of bus stops 80% use the line to get to and from work Almost 90% of riders use the line every day Most riders transfer, either at Greenbelt Metro or another location 78% live in MD; 17% in DC

B30: Preliminary Recommendations to be evaluated Add 8:00 am trips on weekends Improve frequency from 40 to 30 minutes at all times Shift trips to I-95 when B-W Parkway is congested Evaluate feasibility of adding more luggage space on B30 buses Add info to timetable and at stops about $6 fare and exact change requirement Evaluate potential for fare card dispenser at B30 stops Evaluate cost (with MDOT) of adding trips during heaviest travel times (holidays)

87-88 & 89-89M: Preliminary Recommendations Combine 87-88 and 89-89M into one bi-directional route between College Park Metro and Greenbelt Metro via Route 1, Route 197, Muirkirk Road, Old Baltimore Pike, and Edmonston Avenue The 89-89M would not circulate through Laurel New service would meet Metro s guidelines for service hours and frequency (6 am to 8 pm; 30 min. peak, 60 min. off-peak) Improve bus stop amenities, consolidate stops Address signal timing and traffic bottleneck issues Benefits: direct connections from Route 1 north of the Beltway and Laurel to College Park; service to commercial areas on Old Baltimore Pike; more direct/faster service; better connectivity Recommendations are preliminary and to be evaluated further.

Next Steps Finalize recommendations based on public input and additional required analysis Estimate capital and operational costs Identify funding sources Complete final report Receive WMATA Board approval Develop implementation plans

Contact Information Web: www.metrobus-studies.com E-mail: info@metrobus-studies.com Twitter: @MetrobusStudies Phone: 703-340-3105