Elevation Bands Description of terrain characteristics to which the avalanche danger ratings apply.

Similar documents
Typical avalanche problems

Avalanche Awareness and Leading a Companion Rescue

American Avalanche Association Forest Service National Avalanche Center Avalanche Incident Report: Long Form

AVALANCHE TERRAIN. Bill Glude Alaska Avalanche Specialists All photos and graphics Bill Glude unless otherwise noted.

Twin Lakes Avalanche Incident 1/31/2016

Henderson Mountain Avalanche Accident Two riders caught, one partially buried, one fully buried

Avalanche Safety Guidelines This guideline is intended as a general introduction to this topic.

Excelsior Pass Avalanche Accident January 1, 2008

Avalanche Safety Guidelines

Avalanche danger high in parts of NCW

NWAC Blog. Cornices - don't walk the line! Written by Robert Hahn on March 14, Last update on May 15, 2017.

SYNOPSIS WEATHER AND SNOWPACK

Morning Star Peak Avalanche Accident

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS OF AVALANCHES: PRELIMINARY RESEARCH IN GLACIER NATIONAL PARK

Part 1: Introduction to Decision Making

In southern Upper Valais a very high avalanche danger will be encountered in some regions Edition: , 08:00 / Next update: 9.1.

Slot Couloir Accident, Snoqualmie Mt

Avalanche Accident Report

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Banff, 2014

Swede Creek Avalanche Incident Report Swede Creek, Whitefish Range, MT Date of Avalanche: 23 January 2016 Date of Site Visit: 24 January 2016

THRESHOLD GUIDELINES FOR AVALANCHE SAFETY MEASURES

Avalanche Mountain Incident March 4 th, 2017

Number Caught: 2 Partially Buried, Non-Critical: 1 Partially Buried, Critical: 0 Fully Buried: 1 Injured: 1 Killed: 1

Washington Explorer Search and Rescue Pierce County Unit February 2013

American Avalanche Association Forest Service National Avalanche Center Avalanche Incident Report: Short Form

Self-Guided Group Organization - Recommendations

Avalanche accident case study: Persistent buried weak layer in the Central Idaho Mountains

2010 International Snow Science Workshop

NivoTest : a personal assistant for avalanche risk assessment

International Snow Science Workshop

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016 ANALYSIS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FATALITIES IN THE MODERN ERA

MP : the top of the bottom switchback

Ski / Sled tracks as an expression of avalanche risk Jordy Hendrikx 1 & Jerry Johnson 2,1 1.

Going-to-the-Sun Road, Glacier National Park, MT, USA Avalanche Path Atlas

THE DANGERATOR: A METHOD FOR ESTIMATING AVALANCHE DANGER IN AREAS WITH NO PUBLIC AVALANCHE FORECAST

Introduction to Safety on Glaciers in Svalbard

Corona Bowl Avalanche Incident, December 6th, 2015

AN AVALANCHE CHARACTERIZATION CHECKLIST FOR BACKCOUNTRY TRAVEL DECISIONS. Roger Atkins* Canadian Mountain Holidays

Twin Wildcat Lakes Avalanche Wednesday, February 1, 2012 Incident Report

SNOW AVALANCHE AVOIDANCE POLICY 2011

Park Butte Avalanche Fatality March 10 th, 2018

2/16/2014 Idaho Frenchman Creek Published by Scott Savage, SAC

Example of the layout of a Fieldwork Atlas

Twin Peaks Near Miss Report Turnagain Pass, Kenai Mountains, Alaska

Avalanche Observations

LEVEL 1 - AVALANCHE OVERVIEW HANDOUT

Granite Mountain Avalanche Fatality, December 31st, 2015 Report prepared by NWAC

TUPPER DESIGNATED ACCESS ROUTE

Cottonwood Lake Avalanche Fatality February, 25th 2018

Snowmobile Safety Tips

Glaciers. Reading Practice

FRANCE : HOW TO IMPROVE THE AVALANCHE KNOWLEDGE OF MOUNTAIN GUIDES? THE ANSWER OF THE FRENCH MOUNTAIN GUIDES ASSOCIATION. Alain Duclos 1 TRANSMONTAGNE

Crystal Mountain Snow Safety Union Creek Avalanche Accident Report December 2, 2007

THE SME AVALANCHE TRAGEDY OF JANUARY 20, 2003: A SUMMARY OF THE DATA. Dick Penniman* Snowbridge Associates Frank Baumann Baumann Engineering

GOLDEN EARS PROVINCIAL PARK

Mountain Goats and Winter Recreation November 17, 2011

Chapter 7 Snow and ice

International Snow Science Workshop

BLASTING GLACIAL ICE AND SNOW ABSTRACT

Unit 1: Physical Environment Glaciated Landscapes

Avalanche Forecasting for Transportation Corridor and Backcountry in Glacier National Park (BC, Canada)

23 rd National Avalanche School Snowbird Ski and Summer Resort, UT October 27-31,2013. Student Prework

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016

AVALANCHE SAFETY PLAN

Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska

Guidelines for Snow Avalanche Risk Determination and Mapping. David McClung University of British Columbia

Skyland Avalanche Saturday, February 25, 2012 Incident Report

Snow Lake Divide Avalanche Fatality February 25th, 2018

Avalanches and the Mount Whitney Basin

AVALANCHE INSTRUCTOR S MANUAL TAB: TEST BANK CHAPTER 9. UPDATED VERSION AVALANCHE TEST BANK (without answers) January 1999

Avalanche Bulletin Interpretation Guide

Q: What is a period of time whereby the average global temperature has decreased? Q: What is a glacier?

Avalanche Incident on Twin Peaks Flint Creek Range December 24, 2013

Snow camping: Once you try building an ice shelter, you just may dig it

Alaska Heli Skiing. Leadership & Guide Training Course Information 12 days. Course Location

The Potentially Dangerous Glacial Lakes

EU/EFTA service providers in Switzerland Note relating to individuals providing services as. Hiking guides

GLACIER STUDIES OF THE McCALL GLACIER, ALASKA

Opportunities for Snowmobile Avalanche Education: An Exploration of the Current State of Snowmobiling in the Backcountry

2010 International Snow Science Workshop

Lane Peak, Fly Couloir Avalanche 2/25/2017

VISITOR RISK MANAGEMENT APPLIED TO AVALANCHES IN NEW ZEALAND

2010 International Snow Science Workshop

Using stability tests and regional avalanche danger to estimate the local avalanche danger

New Motorized Level I Avalanche Class!

Alaska Avalanche Information Center (AAIC) Season Summary Statewide AAIC Outreach Stats: ANCHORAGE (AAC)

Snow Way by Beth Geiger

Guide Training Ski TAP APPLICATION PACKAGE. Hello and thank you for your interest in applying to the ACMG Training and Assessment Program (TAP).

Linking avalanche hazard in Western Canada to climate oscillations

Active Glacier Protection in Austria - An adaptation strategy for glacier skiing resorts

Geography 120, Instructor: Chaddock In Class 13: Glaciers and Icecaps Name: Fill in the correct terms for these descriptions: Ablation zone: n zne:

Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska

Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska

A conceptual model of avalanche hazard

SLOPE CALCULATION. Wilderness Trekking School 1

REPORT. MANASLU EXPEDITION (8163 m) Track NE (traditional)

Below is an example of a well laid-out template of a route card used by the Sionnach Team which is a good format to begin with.

American Conservation Experience

Mt. Thielsen Trip Report: April 29, 2012

Transcription:

1 Definition of Terms used in Daily Trip Forms This document is part of Decision Making in Avalanche Terrain: a fieldbook for winter backcountry users by Pascal Haegeli, Roger Atkins and Karl Klassen and provides indepth background information for on the topic of How to Use the Daily Trip Forms. For additional background information on the topics covered in the field book visit www.avalanche.ca/cac/decisionmaking A detailed description of how to use the daily trip from including a guide to the abbreviations can be found on pages 14 and 15 of the field book. In this document, we provide more detailed explanations regarding the various observations and terms used in the daily trip forms. Regional Avalanche Danger Elevation Bands Description of terrain characteristics to which the avalanche danger ratings apply. Alpine (ALP) Treeline (TL) Below Treeline (BTL) Areas above the treeline. Small, isolated trees may be found at the low end of this elevation band but they quickly give way to large expanses of open slopes leading to ridges and peaks. This entire band is highly exposed to the effects of wind. The transition area between densely forested areas below and alpine regions with few or no trees above, also known as sub alpine. Trees are generally smaller and are found in non contiguous stands separated by open, wind exposed areas. The treeline zone is a relatively narrow band compared to below treeline and alpine. Densely forested areas that may have openings and glades within them large enough to create relatively small avalanches. Avalanche runout zones from higher regions may run through this elevation band.

2 Avalanche Danger Avalanche danger is determined by the likelihood, size and distribution of avalanches. For a detailed description of the five avalanche danger levels, see the complete definition table of the North American Avalanche Danger Scale on the inside of the cover of the field book. Trend Development of danger ratings leading up to the date of your trip, over the duration of your trip, or in the immediate period after your trip. Decreasing ( ) Steady ( ) Melt freeze Cycle (MF) Increasing ( ) Avalanche conditions are improving and avalanche danger levels are expected to decrease during the forecast period No significant change in avalanche conditions is expected during the forecast period Daily melt freeze cycles are common in the spring when the level of avalanche hazard is highly dependent on the time of the day. Avalanche hazard is normally low in the morning when the snow surface is frozen, but increases to high in the afternoon when the crust disintegrates and the upper snowpack becomes wet or slushy due to solar radiation and/or warm temperatures. Avalanche conditions are worsening and avalanche danger levels are expected to increase during the forecast period. Confidence Description of your certainty about your assessment based on the quantity and quality of the available information and the spatial and temporal variability of the existing conditions. Many different combinations of information availability and variability can lead to Fair or Poor confidence ratings. Good Fair Large amounts of high quality data and low variability allow for accurate and detailed prediction and assessment of avalanche hazard. Limited availability of high quality information or high variability restricts ability to predict and assess

3 avalanche hazard accurately. Decision making requires large margin of error. Poor Limited and low quality information in combination with high spatial variability result in serious limitations in predicting and assessing avalanche hazard. Conservative choices required for maintaining necessary margin of safety. Avalanche Problem Nature of expected or observed avalanches. Loose Dry Avalanches (LD) Loose Wet Avalanches (LW) Wet Slabs (WT) See detailed Avalanche Problem Essentials for detailed descriptions of the character of the different avalanche problems. Cornice (CO) Wind Slabs (WD) Storm Slabs (ST) Persistent Slabs (PS) Deep Persistent Slabs (DP) Field Observations Avalanche Activity Avalanche Size (Size) Expected or observed avalanche size according to Canadian avalanche size classification. None No avalanche activity has occurred within the last 24 36 hours AND no current avalanche activity observed in the field. 1.0 Avalanches too small to bury or seriously injure a person. 1.5 2.0 Avalanches large enough to bury, seriously injure or kill a person. 2.5 Large destructive avalanches that have a low chance of

4 survival. Unknown Size (U) Avalanches have occurred recently or are occurring, but the size is unknown. Avalanche Trigger (Trigger) Size of expected or observed trigger required to release an avalanche. Heavy Moderate (Mod) Light Natural Unknown Trigger (U) Large group of snowmobiles in the same place on the slope. Large cornice. Small icefall. Explosive charge > 15 kg. Large group of skiers or several snowmobiles in the same place on the slope. Small cornice. Explosive charge 5 15 kg. A single skier or snowmobiler. Explosive charge < 5 kg. Avalanches triggered from far away (remote trigger). Avalanches triggered by weather events (outside the control of human actions). Avalanche have occurred, but triggers are unknown. Avalanche Character (Char) Nature of expected or observed avalanches. See detailed Avalanche Problem Essentials for detailed descriptions of the character of the different avalanche problems. Field Observation Signs of Instability See/Feel Expected or observed signs of unstable snow during travel. No Signs (None) Drum like Sounds (Drum) Cracking (Crack) No cracks occur in the snowpack as you travel. No sign or sound of the snowpack collapsing (whumpfing) as you travel. Hollow, drum like sounds means that you are standing on a hard slab on top of soft snow. Bad: cracks shoot up to 10 m from your skis or sled as you travel.

5 Worse: cracks more than 10 m, especially if wider than 2 3 cm. Whumpf The snowpack visibly or audibly collapses beneath you or around you as you travel. Observations cannot be made due to poor visibility, strong winds that inhibit hearing, noise or speed of sled travel, etc. Compression Test (Comp Test) Fracture character result of compression test. See Snowpack Test Essentials for more information on how to snow profiles and stability tests can be used to better understand the snowpack and the development of persistent instabilities. None Failure Pop Drop Unknown Failure (U) Compression test produces no failure in the snow column. A failure occurs in the snow column but it is not a pop or drop. Thin planar fracture that suddenly crosses the column at one loading step and the block slides easily on the weak layer. Fracture that crosses the column with a single loading step and is associated with a noticeable collapse in the weak layer. Limited training or experience prevents proper characterization of test results. Rutschblock Test (R Block) Fracture character result of rutschblock test. See Snowpack Test Essentials for more information on how to snow profiles and stability tests can be used to better understand the snowpack and the development of persistent instabilities. None Part Most Rutschblock test produces no failure. < 50 % of the block breaks free and displaces. 50 80 % of the block breaks free and displaces.

6 Whole Unknown Failure (U) > 80 % of the block breaks free and displaces. Limited training or experience prevents proper characterization of test results. Field Observation Weather Precipitation (Precip) Intensity of snowfall or rain expected or experienced during you trip. Nil Light Snowfall (SL) Moderate Snowfall (SM) Heavy Snowfall (SH) Drizzle (DZ) Rain (RN) No precipitation of any kind. 1 cm/hour 2 cm/hour 3 cm/hour 1 mm/hour > 1 mm/hour Precipitation is occurring but you do not have the experience, training, or tools to estimate or measure intensity. Accumulation in the last 48 hours Estimated general accumulation of new snow in the area of your trip over the last 48 hours. 0 No new snow. < 20 Less than 20 cm of new snow 20 40 20 40 cm of new snow > 40 More than 40 cm of new snow Snow is falling or has fallen but the amount of accumulation is unknown (e.g. you are at valley bottom and your trip is at higher elevations).

7 Wind Speed (Wind Sp) General wind speed in the area of your trip. Calm Light Moderate (Mod) Strong Extreme No air motion. Smoke rises vertically. Flags and twigs in motion. Small trees sway. Flags stretched. Snow begins to drift. Whole trees in motion. Snow drifting extensively. Difficulty walking. Slight to considerable tree damage. Wind is occurring but strength is unknown (e.g., you are at valley bottom and you can see or hear wind at upper elevations, it s too dark to see well, etc.). Wind Direction (Wind Dir) The compass direction where the wind is coming from. Maximum Temperature (Max Temp) Expected or observed maximum temperature during the day. Cold (< 5): 5 C or colder. Near 0 5 to 0 C Above Freezing (> 0) Warmer than 0 C Rapid Rise Close to Freezing (Rapid Rise) Temperature rising more than 5 C in a three hour period and warmer than 5 C at the end of the three hours. You do not have the tools required to measure temperature. Solar Radiation Intensity of warming effect of the sun on snow surface. None Weak No noticeable warming effect. For example: thick cloud, cold temperatures, high latitude, and/or early season are negating warming effect. Snow surface slowly becoming moist due to solar

8 radiation. Moderate (Mod) Strong Snow surface becoming wet due to solar radiation. Snow surface rapidly becoming wet or slushy due to solar radiation. Solar radiation is occurring but it s effect on the surface is unknown (e.g. you are in a shaded valley bottom location and the sun is shining on slopes or cornices above). Route Plan Avalanche Terrain Exposure Scale (ATES) Overall, large scale measure of avalanche exposure of entire trip based on its terrain characteristics. Simple Challenging Complex Exposure to low angle or primarily forested terrain. Some forest openings may involve the runout zones of infrequent avalanches. Many options to reduce or eliminate exposure. No glacier travel. Exposed to well defined avalanche paths, starting zones or terrain traps; options exist to reduce or eliminate exposure with careful route finding. Glacier travel is straightforward but crevasse hazards may exist. Exposure to multiple overlapping avalanche paths or large expanses of steep, open terrain; multiple avalanche starting zones and terrain traps below; minimal options to reduce exposure. Complicated glacier travel with extensive crevasse bands or icefalls. The terrain is not rated. You do not have the training or experience to interpret the rating or to generate your own rating. The terrain is not visible from where you are or you do not have the information required to produce a rating.

9 Risk Management Terrain Cautions Incline The incline of the steepest sections of the terrain that is directly connected to your immediate location. The spatial extent of the terrain that needs to be included in this assessment depends on nature of the avalanche problem. For example, a bigger area needs to be included in your assessment when dealing with a persistent slab problem as remote triggering is a concern. Between 30 and 35 degrees steep (30 35) Steeper than 35 degrees (> 35) Roughly equivalent to a black diamond run at a ski hill. Roughly equivalent to a double black diamond run at a ski hill Slope Shape Configuration of slope along fall line. This is more important on smaller slopes. Convex Unsupported A slope that gets progressively steeper downhill. A slope where the snowpack is thinner and/or weaker at the bottom than at the top. A slope where there is a break in the terrain that produces a discontinuity in the snowpack (e.g. a cliff or steep drop in the middle of a slope with snow covered more moderate terrain above and below). Wind Exposure Direction of a slope with respect to current or previous wind directions. Leeward (Lee) Cross loaded (X Loaded) Locations where wind is aligned with the fall line and deposits snow downwind of an obstacle such as a ridge. On lee slopes the upper part of a bowl is typically loaded. Often, a cornice overhangs a leeward slope. A place where wind blows across the fall line depositing snow beside obstacles aligned with the fall line. Cross slope winds typically load one side of gullies and chutes.

10 Solar Exposure Direction of a slope with respect to the influence of solar radiation. Sunny Slopes that are highly exposed to solar radiation. This changes somewhat depending on surrounding terrain, latitude, time of year, and time of day. Slope Size Size of slope you have to exposure yourself to or distance you need to travel between safe spots. Large Slopes (Lrg Slp) Any slope size that makes escape difficult if an avalanche occurs or survival would be questionable due to the expected size of the resulting avalanche. This assessment varies somewhat depending on the nature of the avalanche problem. Hazard from Above (Hzd above) Any slope where an avalanche or cornice fall might start above and could run onto the slope below. Terrain Traps Any terrain feature that could increase the time of burial or severity of injury if caught in an avalanche including gullies, crevasses, trees, open water, rapid transitions, and so on. Risk Management Travel Techniques Terrain Restrictions No Start Zones No Avalanche Tracks (No Av Tracks) No Runout Zones No Avalanche Terrain (No Av Terrain) Stay in Protective Forest Avoid all avalanche start zones. Avoid all avalanche tracks. Avoid all avalanche runout zones. Avoid avalanche terrain in general. Travel only in forested areas where trees are dense (spaced no more than 2m apart on average) and no

11 large open areas exist. Group Management Safe Regroup Locations Spread out Protective forest. Low angle (<20 degree incline) open slopes with no hazard above Travel far enough apart to minimize the chance of more than one person being caught in an avalanche. Distance required varies depending on the avalanche problem and the terrain features. 1 x 1 Travel one at a time through avalanche terrain Additional Readings Canadian Avalanche Association, 2007. Observation Guidelines and Recording Standards for Weather, Snowpack, and Avalanches, Revelstoke, BC. This document describes the type, techniques and recording format used by Canadian avalanche professionals when taking observations for operational snow stability assessment and avalanche hazard forecasting. The guidelines cover weather observations, characteristics of the snowpack, in situ strength tests of the snow and occurrences of avalanches. FILE VERSION Version 1.0; October 1, 2010 USE AT YOUR OWN RISK This content of this document is intended for personal and recreational purposes in combination with the field book Decision Making in Avalanche Terrain: a field book for winter backcountry users only. The content provided in this document is provided as is and in no event shall the Canadian Avalanche Centre be liable for any damages, including without limitation damages resulting from discomfort, injury or death, claims by third parties or for other similar costs, or any special incidental or consequential damages arising out of the use of this publication. Mountain travel is dangerous and can involve exposure to avalanches and other hazards. The advice and decision guidelines provided in this field book cannot eliminate these hazards, but they can help you understand and manage them. This field book is no substitute for training, experience, and choosing skilled and responsible travel partners.

12 To find an avalanche training course near you, visit www.avalanche.ca. CITATION Please cite the content of this document as: Haegeli, P., Atkins, R., and Klassen, K. (2010) Auxiliary material for Decision making in avalanche terrain: a field book for winter backcountry users. Canadian Avalanche Centre, Revelstoke, B.C. Accessed at www.avalanche.ca/decisionmaking.