AirportInfo. Airport Improvement Program

Similar documents
Airport. Improvement Program (AIP) Overview. Federal Aviation Administration. Texas Aviation Conference Ben Guttery, Texas ADO April 2017

Airport Funding FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP)

AirportInfo. Passenger Facility Charge

Session 6 Airport Finance 101 Funding Sources for Airports

AirportInfo. Aeronautical Revenue

Office of Airports. Overview of the FAA s. Federal Aviation Administration ACI-NA/AAAE Airport Board & Commissioners Conference Indianapolis, IN

Next Generation Air Transportation System Financing Reform Act of 2007

Financing Airport Improvements

APPENDIX B NATIONAL PLAN OF INTEGRATED AIRPORT SYSTEMS

AirportInfo. Airport Operating Expenses

Airport Improvement Program: Issues for Congress

MassDOT Aeronautics Division Capital Improvements Presentation

Airport Improvement Program (AIP): Reauthorization Issues for Congress

National Association of State Aviation Officials. John Shea Government Relations Manager (703)

FAA Reauthorization Issues & Impacts on Airports

Washington Update: FAA Reauthorization, ATC Reform, 1500 Hour Rule, and $1 Billion in Omnibus Funding

AirportInfo. Non-Aeronautical Revenue

6.0 Capital Improvement Program. 6.1 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)

Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL

Financial Feasibility Analysis Terminal Programming Study Des Moines Airport Authority

Airport Finance 101 Session 3 - Capital Funding

ANALYSIS OF PROVISIONS AFFECTING AIRPORTS AND THEIR COMMUNITIES IN HOUSE AND SENATE FAA REAUTHORIZATION BILLS

Annual Airport Finance and Administration Conference Innovative Funding Strategies. March 4, 2013 Destin, Florida Bonnie Deger Ossege

AIRPORT CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT NEEDS

COMMERCIAL AVIATION. Raising Passenger Facility Charges Would Increase Airport Funding, but Other Effects Less Certain

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012

Chapter 9: Financial Plan Draft

Chapter 2 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS

Federal Perspectives on Public-Private Partnerships (P3) in the United States

CHAPTER 7 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES AND PROGRAMS. Provide Airport Encroachment Protection. Standardize Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions

APPENDIX D AIRPORT CLASSIFICATION

AIRPORT WITH NO RUNWAYS IS A MALL

ANALYSIS OF PROVISIONS AFFECTING AIRPORTS AND THEIR COMMUNITIES IN HR 915, FAA REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2009

DALLAS LOVE FIELD MAY 2015 DRAFT

Chapter 9 Airport Financial Plan

Development Program and Implementation Plan

RNO Master Plan Approved Alternatives, Financial Analysis, and Facilities Implementation Plan

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Reauthorization: An Overview of Legislative Action in the 112 th Congress

PUBLIC NOTICE. Table 1 Projects Proposed by Amendment

Chapter VI Implementation Planning

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Washington Aviation System Plan Update July 2017 i

THE ACC YOUNG PROFESSIONALS PRESENT: Follow the Money: An Introduction to Airport Finance. November 30, :00 PM 2:00 PM EST

and Forecast Review and Approval Process

Financial Feasibility Analysis

,~-- JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT, ORANGE COUNTY. Airline Competition Plan UPDATE. Barry A. Rondinella, A.A.E/C.A.E. Airport Director

Airports and UAS: Integrating UAS into Airport Infrastructure and Planning

Financing Airport Capital Development: The Aviation Industry's Greatest Challenge

Aviation Operating Administration/Executive

PORT OF PORTLAND. Chapter Seven CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Aviation Tax Report. June 30, 2016

Manager of Strategy and Policy. SUBJECT: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE DATE: April 28, Federal. Raising the Passenger Facility Charge Cap

2018 Accomplishments

Recommended Performance Measures

P U B L I C N O T I C E. MBS International Airport Freeland, Michigan Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application C-00-MBS

Preferred Alternative Summary

PENSACOLA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE WORKING PAPER 8 FINANCIAL PLAN

Finance and Implementation

ACRP 01-32, Update Report 16: Guidebook for Managing Small Airports Industry Survey

FAA Update. Dakota-Minnesota (DMA) Airports District Office. Federal Aviation Administration. Presented to: By: Date: Minnesota Council of Airports

APPENDIX B: NPIAS CANDIDATE AIRPORT ANALYSIS

Rates & Charges Analysis

BACKGROUNDER. Airports are the backbone of America s aviation system, serving

Roddy Boggus, Chair, ACC Board of Directors, Suffolk

RESOLUTION NO

2017 Accomplishments

MOST aircraft need a runway for landing and takeout.

ARP Forecast Review Critical Aircraft Data Sources

New Hampshire Rural Airports

Aviation Planning in Maine and Our Region. Stacie Haskell Aviation Coordinator & Study Manager Maine Department of Transportation April 27, 2011

SENATE PASSES FAA REAUTHORIZATION BILL

2017 Appropriation Budget Table of Contents Board Approved August 19, 2016

Quarterly Performance Measurement Report

Chapter 8.0 Implementation Plan


TXDOT AVIATION DIVISION

CHAPTER 5: Financial Feasibility Analysis and Facilities Implementation Plan

Alaska Aviation System Plan (AASP) Overview. June 2010

Amendments to PFC Applications C 03 LAX and C 00 LAX

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Business Plan INTRODUCTION AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND OVERVIEW. Master Plan Guiding Principles

AirportInfo. ACI-NA 2011 Traffic Report

AIRPORT FUND. Description. Summary

Current Airport Roles

Kittitas County Airport Bowers Field Airport Master Plan Planning Advisory Committee Meeting #1 April 6, 2016

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview

Chapter Seven Implementation Plan. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

Table of Contents. Master Plan March 2014 TOC i Spokane International Airport

Intergovernmental Coordination in Aviation Development

United States House of Representatives Congressional STAFF REPORT U.S. AIRPORTS IN CRISIS

Section (a)(1). Description of Projects Impose and Use

Analysis Item 71: Department of Aviation Aurora State Airport Runway Extension

Funding Airport Infrastructure: Federal Options for Solvency

FY 2018 Rates, Fees, and Charges Year End Reconciliation. Finance Department P.O. Box DFW Airport, Texas

Passenger Facility Charge Application #1

PROMOTION CONFERENCES ADDITIONAL BENEFITS COMPLIMENTARY PUBLICATIONS

PORT OF SEATTLE PRESENTATION TO THE WESTERN STATES INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS CONFERENCE MAY 15, 2018

8 Financial Plan. 8.1 Airport s Financial Structure. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Nashville International Airport

Transcription:

AirportInfo Airport Improvement Program April 2014

Airport Improvement Program (AIP) AIP provides grants to airport sponsors for the planning and development of public-use airports. To be eligible for an AIP grant, airports must meet the following criteria: 1) be publicly owned, or privately owned, but designated by the FAA as a reliever, or 2) be privately owned, but having scheduled commercial service and at least 2,500 annual enplanements, and 3) further, an airport must be included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport System (NPIAS). The NPIAS is published every two years and identifies public-use airports that are important to public transportation and contribute to the needs of civil aviation, national defense and the postal service. For large and medium primary hub airports, the grant covers 75 percent of eligible costs (or 80 percent for noise program implementation). For small primary, reliever, and general aviation airports, the grant covers a range of 90-95 percent of eligible costs, based on statutory requirements. The AIP program is 100% funded by the Airport and Airway Trust Fund (AATF), the revenue of which are derived from aviation-related excise taxes and fees on passengers, cargo, and fuel. In addition to AIP, AATF also provides over two-thirds of funding for the FAA. Source: FAA 2

AIP A Critical Funding Source for Capacity, Safety, Security and Environmental Projects Eligible projects include those improvements related to enhancing airport safety, capacity, security, and environmental concerns. In general, AIP funds can be used: on most airfield capital improvement or repairs and in some specific situations, for terminals, hangars, and non-aviation development; any professional services that are necessary for eligible projects such as planning, surveying, and design; and aviation demand at the airport must justify the projects, which must also meet Federal environmental and procurement requirements. Because the demand for AIP funds exceeds the availability, FAA bases distribution of these funds on current national priorities and objectives. AIP funds are typically first apportioned into major entitlement categories such as primary, cargo, and general aviation. Remaining funds are distributed to a discretionary fund. Set-aside projects (airport noise and the Military Airport Program) receive first attention from this discretionary distribution. The remaining funds are true discretionary funds that are distributed according to a national prioritization formula. Source: FAA 3

In Millions AIP Funding Has Been Decreasing Grants-in-Aid Administration R&D ACRP SCASDP $3,600 $3,500 $3,400 $10 $18 $71 $75 $19 $19 $22 $22 $81 $87 $93 $93 $3,300 $3,200 $29 $101 $30 $107 $3,100 $3,000 $2,900 $2,800 $2,700 $3,459 $3,437 $3,395 $3,385 $3,378 $3,378 $3,199 $29 $101 $2,939 $3,194 $30 $107 $2,748 While the AIP program was essentially level-funded at $3.515 billion from 2006-2011, AIP has been cut twice in the past four years, first in the FY 2012 appropriations process from $3.5 billion to $3.35 billion, and most recently by an additional $253 million in FY2013 to end FAA furloughs. The actual amount available for grants decreased even further due to additional administrative and research funding needs. Source: FAA FY2015 Budget Estimates *FY2015 based on President s Budget 4

AIP Grants by Fund Type State Apportionment 7.4% Small Airport Fund 15.2% Capacity/Safety/ Security/Noise Set Aside 7.3% 9.5% Pure Discretionary 1.8% Discretionary from Converted Entitlements 17.3% Nonprimary Entitlement 12.6% Alaska Supplement 0.7% Cargo Entitlement 3.5% Passenger Entitlement 23.4% Source: FAA for FY2013 5

AIP & PFC are Used to Fund Different Types of Projects Due Largely to Differing Eligibility Requirements Distribution of AIP Grants and PFC Approvals by Project Type (FY08-FY12) 80% 70% 70.3% Percentage of PFC Percentage of AIP 60% 50% 40% 30% 31.2% 43.2% 20% 10% 0% 16.9% 11.2% 10.8% 6.7% 6.8% 1.9% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% Airside Landside/Terminal State block grants Noise Roads/Access Interest on Bonds Source: 2013 Financing Airport Improvements Report, Congressional Research Service. 6

in Millions FY 2013 Grant Distribution by Airport Classification 800 Entitlement Discretionary LOI Entitlement LOI Discretionary 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Source: FAA Large Medium Small Non-hub Commercial Service Reliever General Aviation Other 7

AIP Flow of Funds FY 2013 Congress Authorized and Appropriated Amount $3,350M Small Community Air Service Development Program $6M Administrative Expenses $101M Double Entitlement Trigger : $3.2B Research & Development $44.2M Net Passenger Entitlements Total Available for AIP Grants $3,199M $850.3M Primary Airports $1,406M Cargo (3% of total available for AIP grants) $112M Alaska Supplemental $21.3M States (20% of total available for AIP grants) $639.8 Protected Entitlements (Carryover) $702.7M Nonprimary Entitlement $401M State Apportionment by Formula $237.5M PFC Turn Back $556M 12.5% $69.5M Small Hub Airports $69.5M 87.5% $486.4M Non- Commercial Service Airports $139M Small Airport Fund $486.4M Non-hub Airports $278M Discretionary Funds Total Available Discretionary Funds $386.6M Available Funds Admin Entitle ments Small Airport Fund Turnback LOI

FY 2013 AIP Flow of Funds: Discretionary Total Available Discretionary Funds $386.6M Letter of Intent Discretionary Large Hub $182.6M Letter of Intent Discretionary Medium Hub $39.7M Noise Set- Aside (35% of Discretionary) $133.5M Reliever Set- Aside (0.66% of Discretionary) $2.5M Military Airports Program (MAP) (4% of Discretionary) $15.3M Remaining Available Discretionary Funds $235.3M AIP Grab: $253M Capacity/Safety/Security/Noise Discretionary Projects $176.5M Remaining Pure Discretionary Funds $58.8M Unallocated Pure Discretionary Funds $13M Total Pure Discretionary Funds for FY 2013 $462.7M Discretionary Funds Available Funds Admin Entitle ments Small Airport Fund Turnback 9 LOI

Millions AIP Carryover Has Been Increasing 800 700 600 500 400 Nonprimary Passenger Cargo State or State/Insular 703 726 585 622 550 35.8% 37.4% 300 200 100 57.6% 58.9%. Source: FAA 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 AIP carryover entitlement has been increasing for the past five years. Nonprimary airports represented 59% of the total carryover entitlement in 2013 and increased their share by 1.3 percentage points. Passenger entitlement which includes all primary airports represented 37% of the total carryover in 2013 and increased their share by 1.6 percentage point. 10

Why Care About High Carryover? Passenger and cargo entitlement funds for large, medium and small hubs, State Apportionment, and Alaska supplemental are available two fiscal years immediately following the year in which the funds are apportioned, or a total of three years. Nonhub primary and nonprimary entitlement and cargo entitlement funds are available three fiscal years immediately following the year in which the funds are apportioned, or a total of four years. Discretionary funds have to be spent the same year when granted. High carryover translates to high uncertainty for future discretionary funds. High carryover makes it an easy target for a potential future AIP grab as it happened in FY2013. Source: FAA AIP Handbook 11

AirportInfo April 2014 Contact: Economic Affairs and Research Tel: 202-293-8500 Email: EconomicAffairs@aci-na.org www.aci-na.org