Demand-Responsive Transportation in the TCQSM

Similar documents
PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

LODI CITY COUNCIL Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

Presentation Outline

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT + SAN LUIS OBISPO RTA JOINT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS: SERVICE STRATEGIES. Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP; Principal

DAILY TRIPS (LOOP) Monday-Friday 6:55 AM to 6:20 PM 60/60/ 11 Saturday 7:55 AM to 5:55 PM 60/ 10 Sunday

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

Board of Directors Information Summary

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Montgomery Area Paratransit Guide

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

(This page intentionally left blank.)

Swedish Service Routes, American Style: Local Bus for the Suburbs 70TH ANNUAL OHIO TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE OCTOBER 25, 2016

Paratransit Bus Services Guide

Community Feedback and Survey Participation Topic: ACCESS Paratransit Services

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

Union Station Queens Quay Transit Link Study

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

The 15-day comment period will run from Thursday, April 4, 2019 to 4pm on Wednesday April 18, 2019.

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

Paratransit Plan Exhibits 1 and 2 of 14

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

Chapter 5 Alternatives

WELCOME CHAPEL HILL TRANSIT EZ RIDER

ADA Complementary Origin to Destination Paratransit Service. Policies & Procedures

Draft SamTrans Service Plan Public Outreach Presentation

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

DAVIS COMMUNITY TRANSIT

CobbLinc Forward Service Package

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

List of Figures... 4 List of Maps... 6 Introduction... 7 Data Sources... 8

Dial-A-Ride Users Guide UPDATED 8/24/17

ADA Paratransit Requirements

NORTHERN NAPA VALLEY TRANSIT STUDY

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

PLEASE READ Proposal for Sustainable Service

Creating Sustainable Communities Through Public Transportation

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

MERRIMACK VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MVRTA) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE

Lessons Learned from Rebuilding the Muni Subway Schedule Leslie Bienenfeld

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

IT IS CITILINK S MISSION TO PROVIDE SAFE, COURTEOUS AND DEPENDABLE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AT THE MOST REASONABLE COST TO OUR COMMUNITY.

CENTRAL OREGON REGIONAL TRANSIT MASTER PLAN

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014

3. Proposed Midwest Regional Rail System

Berkshire Flyer Working Group. February 13, 2018

Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation Authority

Transit Financial Summary Abilene MPO FY TIP

Evaluation of the Luas System Using the TCQSM Method

METROPOLITAN EVANSVILLE TRANSIT SYSTEM Part I: Comprehensive Operations Analysis Overview July 9 th, 2015 Public Information Meeting

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

These elements are designed to make service more convenient, connected, and memorable.

2014 Access Triennial Findings. December 16, 2014

STA MOVING FORWARD A plan for more and better transit services

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

Paratransit Services

GENERAL ADVISORY CIRCULAR

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon

ADA PARATRANSIT PLAN. Twin Cities Area Transportation Authority 275 East Wall Benton Harbor, MI 49022

ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT

Bristol Virginia Transit

APPENDIX 2 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION SERVICE STANDARDS AND DECISION RULES FOR PLANNING TRANSIT SERVICE

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs CTAA Expo June 2014

4. Proposed Transit Improvements

Transit Options in Marin

REVIEW OF SUN METRO LIFT SERVICES

Berkshire Flyer Working Group. January 30, 2018

4 YORK REGION TRANSIT DON MILLS SUBWAY STATION ACCESS AGREEMENT

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

Service Recommendation Plan. June 2018

TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS. Presented by: Gaylene Burkett Community Development Department

Dial-A-Ride Focus Group Final Report

Demand Response Service Guide

HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING

All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3

Valley Transit Strategic Plan

Hyannis Loop FALL/WINTER

The Sandwich Line SUMMER 2018

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

STEP ALTERNATIVES RANKING TABLE

SUB-REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

U.S. India Aviation Cooperation Program. Air Traffic Management Training Program Update March 2009

Official Journal of the European Union L 186/27

Jefferson Area Regional Transit Partnership (RTP)

Transcription:

Demand-Responsive Transportation in the TCQSM Buffy Ellis KFH Group, Inc. Presentation Overview Brief introduction to the project DRT in the TCQSM, 1st Edition DRT in the TCQSM, 2nd Edition Key Issues Quality of service and capacity framework for DRT in the 2nd Edition Questions to think about 1

Project Overview Obtain user feedback on the TCQSM 2nd Edition (2003) Recommend additions, revisions, format Conduct gap-filling research Prepare TCQSM 3rd Edition Prepare information program TCQSM Webinar Series Objectives Provide background on TCQSM material for focus group and online survey participants Expand industry s awareness of the manual and its potential uses Lay groundwork for updated training material when the new manual is published (2013) 2

Webinar Series Topics Overview of the TCQSM 2nd Edition Fixed Route Quality of Service Bus Transit Capacity Rail Transit Capacity Ferry Transit Capacity Stop, Station, and Terminal Capacity www.tcqsm.org DRT in the TCQSM, 1st Edition 3

Concepts Quality of Service The measured or perceived performance of transit service, from the riders perspective Capacity Procedures provided for bus loading area, stop, and facility capacity Ridership estimation outside 1st Edition scope How does DRT fit into these? DRT Treatment in the 1st Edition Various terms Uneven treatment Some QOS measures were specific for DRT; in other cases, the fixed-route measures were implied 4

DRT in the TCQSM, 2nd Edition Terminology Paratransit? Demand-responsive transportation? Dial-a-Ride? Specialized transportation? ADA Paratransit? 5

Treatment of ADA Paratransit Should ADA paratransit services be included in QOS framework? DRT definition could include ADA paratransit ADA requirements included in other parts of manual Service quality important to all riders Service so highly prescribed by federal regulation that ADA paratransit might need separate treatment ADA service thresholds might result in poor levels even though compliant May be reluctance to use Quality of Service Framework Should DRT have a separate framework from fixed-route transit? Fixed Route Service Measures Transit Stop Route Segment System Availability Frequency Hours of Service Service Coverage Comfort & Convenience Passenger Load Reliability Transit-Auto Travel Time Demand-Responsive Service Measures Availability Response Time Service Span Comfort & Convenience On-Time Performance Trips Not Served DRT-Auto Travel Time 6

Level of Service Measurement LOS measures: A through F? Key aspects of levels of service: LOS ranges should reflect a traveler s point-of-view. LOS A, therefore, is not necessarily representative of optimum conditions from a transit provider s point-ofview. LOS F should represent an undesirable condition from a traveler s point-of-view. The service provider may choose to set higher standards based on their needs or policy goals. LOS measures for DRT: 1 through 8 Availability Measure Response time: Minimum amount of time for scheduling and accessing a trip Tips for Using Corona Dial A Ride To schedule your trip, please call (951) 734 7220 from 1 to 14 days in advance Plan ahead and allow for flexibility Have your pickup and drop off addresses ready for reservation agent Please be ready and visible to the coach operator during the 30 minute window (15 minutes before scheduled pick up time and 15 minutes after) Have the exact fare ready For your convenience, Dial A Ride links to RTA bus stops and Metrolink stations 7

Response Time Levels of Service LOS Response Time Comments 1 Up to 1/2 hour Very prompt response; similar to exclusive-ride taxi service 2 3 4 More than 1/2 hour and up to 2 hours More than 2 hours but still same day service 24 hours in advance; next day service Prompt response; considered immediate response for DRT service Requires planning but can still travel the day that trip is requested Requires some advance planning 5 48 hours in advance Requires more advance planning than next-day service 6 7 8 More than 48 hours in advance and up to 1 week More than 1wk. in advance and up to 2 wks. More than 2 weeks or not able to accommodate trip Requires advance planning Requires considerable advance planning but may still work for important trips needed soon Requires significant advance planning, or service is not available at all Availability Measure Service Span : The number of hours during the day, and days per week, that DRT service is available. Service area for Sun Cities Area Transit System (SCAT) Reservations: (623) 977-8363 SCAT provides service to the general public and persons with disabilities. A reservation clerk is available between 7:15 a.m. - 5 p.m. Voicemail available 24 hours a day. Non-ADA Service Hours For Sun City and Youngtown: Monday-Friday 7:15 a.m.-5 p.m. For Sun City West (Medical Appointments Only): Monday-Friday 8 a.m.-4 p.m. Saturdays and Holidays: 7:15 a.m.-3 p.m. Saturdays and holidays are by reservation only. Passengers must call by 2 p.m. the previous Thursday to schedule transportation with SCAT. ADA Service Hours Monday-Friday 4:30 a.m.-9 p.m. No ADA service on national holidays when fixed-route bus service is not provided. 8

Service Span Levels of Service Days Per Week Hours Per Day 6-7 5 3-4 2 1 0.5* < 0.5 >16 LOS 1 LOS 2 LOS 4 LOS 5 LOS 6 LOS 7 LOS 8 12-15 LOS 2 LOS 3 LOS 4 LOS 5 LOS 6 LOS 7 LOS 8 9-11 LOS 3 LOS 4 LOS 4 LOS 6 LOS 6 LOS 7 LOS 8 4-8 LOS 5 LOS 5 LOS 5 LOS 6 LOS 7 LOS 7 LOS 8 < 4 LOS 6 LOS 6 LOS 6 LOS 7 LOS 8 LOS 8 LOS 8 Comfort & Convenience Reliability assessed through two measures On-time performance Trips not served 9

Reliability On-time performance: Measures whether DRT vehicle arrives at scheduled/promised time On-Time Performance Levels of Service LOS On-Time Percentage Comments* 1 97.5-100.0% 1 late trip/month 2 95.0-97.4% 2 late trips/month 3 90.0-94.9% 3-4 late trips/month 4 85.0-89.9% 5-6 late trips/month 5 80.0-84.9% 7-8 late trips/month 6 75.0-79.9% 9-10 late trips/month 7 70.0-74.9% 11-12 late trips/month 8 <70.0% More than 12 late trips/month *Based on 30-minute on-time window. Assumes user travels by DRT round trip each weekday for one month, with 20 weekdays/month. 10

Reliability (cont d.) Trips not served Includes two components: Trips turned down Missed trips Trips Not Served LOS Thresholds LOS Percent Trips Not Served Comments* 1 0 1% High quality DRT service; no trip denials or missed trips within month 2 >1% - 2% 1 denial or missed trip within month 3 >2% - 4% 1 to 2 denials or missed trips within month 4 >4 6% 2 denials or missed trips within month 5 >6 8% 3 denials or missed trips within month 6 >8% - 10% 4 denials or missed trips within month 7 >10% - 12% 5 denials or missed trips within month 8 >12% More than 5 denials or missed trips within month *Assumes user travels by DRT round trip each weekday for one month, with 20 weekdays/month. 11

Comfort and Convenience DRT travel time - compares DRT travel time to auto travel time DRT Auto Travel Time Levels of Service LOS Travel Time Difference (min) Comments 1 0 The same or slightly faster by DRT as by automobile 2 1-10 Just about the same or slightly longer by DRT 3 11-20 Somewhat longer by DRT 4 21-30 Satisfactory service 5 31-40 Up to 40 minutes longer by DRT than by automobile 6 41-50 May be tolerable for users who are transit dependent 7 51-60 May indicate a lot of shared riding or long dwell times 8 >60 From most users perspectives, this is too lengthy 12

DRT Capacity TCQSM s framework for transit capacity does not work for DRT DRT capacity relates to number of vehicles and vehicle service hours needed to meet expected ridership demand Questions to Think About 13

Questions to Think About Should ADA paratransit be included as part of DRT for quality of service assessment? If ADA paratransit is not included as part of DRT, should it be treated separately in the TCQSM? What about the scale used for LOS: 1 8, rather than A F? Is LOS even appropriate for DRT? Questions to Think About If LOS is used, should adjustments be made to measures? Travel time: Should DRT travel time be compared to auto travel time (similar to the current measure for fixed-route bus), or to fixed-route bus travel time? Should there be a service coverage measure? 14

We Want Your Input on the TCQSM! Take our online survey to help shape the 3 rd Edition s content Stay involved with the project Give us your e-mail address after completing the survey and we ll keep you informed of future opportunities to provide input www.tcqsm.org Do you go to the Transportation Research Board s Annual Meeting? Attend the meeting of the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Committee (AP015) 15