Front Line Managers (FLMs) and Airline Pilots Training for Operational Evaluation! of enhanced Final Approach Runway Occupancy Signal (efaros) at DFW!

Similar documents
National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Incident Final Report

Human Factors Assessment of Runway Status Lights and Final Approach Runway Occupancy Signal

Office of Airport Safety and Standards

When the U.S. Federal Aviation

Runway Status Lights (RWSL) in Japan. July 2015

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Incident Final Report

Boeing s goal is gateto-gate. crew awareness that promotes safety and efficiency.

Ground movement safety systems and procedures - an overview

Airport Visual Aids. Illuminating Engineering Society October 17 th 21 st, 2010 Seaview Resort Galloway, New Jersey

AIRFIELD SAFETY IN THE UNITED STATES

STABLE APPROACHES. Captain Alan Stealey DSVP Flight Operations Emirates Airline

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM JANUARY 25, 2017

AI AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT THAI AIRASIA X CO., LTD. H S X T C CHINA AIRLINES B

DHMI GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF STATE AIRPORTS AUTHORITY. Suat YILDIRIM ATC Expert

NETWORK MANAGER - SISG SAFETY STUDY

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

Gleim Private Pilot Syllabus Fifth Edition, 3rd Printing Updates March 2016

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Surveillance Performance Requirements for Runway Incursion Prevention Systems

RUNWAY INCURSION PREVENTION PROGRAM ICAO NAM/CAR/SAM RUNWAY SAFETY/INCURSION CONFERENCE Mexico City, 22 to 25 October 2002

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Assisted Visual Separation (CAVS)

CASCADE OPERATIONAL FOCUS GROUP (OFG)

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 3 Presentation 1

Two s Too Many BY MARK LACAGNINA

REPORT IN-011/2012 DATA SUMMARY

Beijing, 18 h of September 2014 Pierre BACHELIER Head of ATM Programme. Cockpit Initiatives. ATC Global 2014

Minimum Safe. Federal Aviation Administration Altitude Warning. Presented to: Pan American Aviation Safety Summit; Sao Paulo, Brazil

GENERAL INFORMATION Aircraft #1 Aircraft #2

THE VILLAGES AVIATION CLUB. SAFETY BRIEF November 2016

[1] Gleim #: Source: AIM Para Learning Statement Code: PLT141

Product Description. SmartRunway and SmartLanding. functions of the. Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System

AERODROME LIGHTING SYSTEM

SURFACE MOVEMENT GUIDANCE AND CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN. Los Angeles International Airport

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

DUTCH SAFETY BOARD. Runway incursion Amsterdam Airport Schiphol

Runway Safety Programme Global Runway Safety Action Plan

II.B. Runway Incursion Avoidance

AN ASSESSMENT OF PREDOMINANT CAUSAL FACTORS OF PILOT DEVIATIONS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO RUNWAY INCURSIONS. Denado M. Campbell

LANCASTER AIRPORT DRIVER TRAINING PROGRAM

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 2 Presentation 2

Session Best Practices Amendments From Annex14, Volume I Annex 15. Runway Incursions Runway Excursions

ERIE ATCT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Flight Evaluation Schedule For GPS IFR Approval Primary Means Enroute, Terminal and Non-Precision Approach

Runway Incursion Preventive measures at aircraft level

FINAL REPORT BOEING B777, REGISTRATION 9V-SWH LOSS OF SEPARATION EVENT 3 JULY 2014

IFALPA. International Federation of Air Line Pilots Associations

CAUTION: WAKE TURBULENCE

Point A to Point B Arrival By Jim Sweeney

Ryanair RAAS Programme


Available Technologies. Session 4 Presentation 1

Advisory Circular. Regulations for Terrain Awareness Warning System

Appendix 6.1: Hazard Worksheet

Federal Aviation Administration Flight Plan Presented at the Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar April 20, 2004

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

The Computerized Analysis of ATC Tracking Data for an Operational Evaluation of CDTI/ADS-B Technology

Appendix B. Comparative Risk Assessment Form

Make Smart, Informed Flight Planning Decisions with Intelligent Weather Insights

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 2 Presentation 1

Appendix F ICAO MODEL RUNWAY INCURSION INITIAL REPORT FORM

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

Runway Incursion Analysis Safety Performance Analysis, Safety and Assurance December 2017

VFR PHRASEOLOGY. The word IMMEDIATELY should only be used when immediate action is required for safety reasons.

OPERATIONS CIRCULAR 01/2012. Subject: HEAD-UP DISPLAYS (HUD) AND ENHANCED VISION SYSTEMS (EVS)

Available Technologies. Asia / Pacific Regional Runway Safety Seminar Session 4

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A00Q0116 RISK OF COLLISION

INCREASING AIRPORT OPERATION SAFETY BASED ON UPDATED OR ENHANCED AIRPORT PAVEMENT MARKINGS: A CASE STUDY PAPER

NM Top 5 Safety Priorities. Tzvetomir BLAJEV

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

TCAS Pilot training issues

THE VILLAGES AVIATION CLUB. November 2014 SAFETY BRIEF

DRONE SIGHTINGS ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A DEPARTURE REGULATOR FOR CLOSELY SPACED PARALLEL RUNWAYS

LFBO / Toulouse-Blagnac / TLS

VIRTUAL AIR TRAFFIC SIMULATION NETWORK UNITED STATES DIVISION. SUBJ: Phoenix (PHX) Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) Standard Operating Procedures

ADVISORY CIRCULAR FOR AIR OPERATORS

Establishing a Risk-Based Separation Standard for Unmanned Aircraft Self Separation

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A02P0290 GEAR-UP LANDING

National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

ADVANCED SURVEILLANCE IN ONE INTEGRATED PACKAGE

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 REVISIONS - ALL SHEETS ARE SAME REVISION STATUS SH REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVE

WORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY. Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World

THE GLIDER PILOTS: Despite extensive tracing action, none of the glider pilots could be identified.

Advisory Circular CT

SKYbrary Safety Forum Preventing Runway Collision June 2017, Brussels. Findings, Strategies and Action Opportunities

LFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG

AERODROME MARKINGS AND SIGNALIZATION

Sensitivity Analysis for the Integrated Safety Assessment Model (ISAM) John Shortle George Mason University May 28, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

REPORT SERIOUS INCIDENT

JUNEAU RUNWAY INCURSION MITIGATION (RIM) PROGRAM. April 10 th 2017

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

Date: 29 Jun 2018 Time: 1502Z Position: 5325N 00312W Location: 5nm NW Liverpool Airport

Calendar 2017 Q1 Runway Safety Report

National Transportation Safety Board

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

Data, Baseline and Predictability supporting the Runway Safety Team

Transcription:

! Front Line Managers (FLMs) and Airline Pilots Training for Operational Evaluation! of enhanced Final Approach Runway Occupancy Signal (efaros) at DFW! Maria Picardi Kuffner! September 2008, updated July 2013! OpEval Training-1! This work was sponsored by the FAA under Air Force Contract No.FA8721-05-C-0002. The opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the United States Government.!

efaros ATC Training and Operational Evaluation! Goal of training! Learn features of the efaros system and display, safety logic and adaptation! Purpose of training! Become familiar with the efaros visual and aural advisories! Objective of efaros Operational Evaluation! Identification and mitigation of status light anomalies! More thorough evaluation of efaros operational suitability! OpEval Training-2!

Overview of RWSL and efaros! Runway Status Lights at DFW consists of existing Runway Entrance Lights (RELs) and Takeoff Hold Lights (THLs) and new enhanced Final Approach Runway Occupancy Signal (efaros)! Runway Status Lights Purpose! Reduce frequency and severity of runway incursions! Prevent runway accidents! How do Runway Status Lights do this? By increasing pilots and ground vehicle operators situational awareness! RELs give a direct warning to pilots and ground vehicle operators that it is unsafe to enter or cross a runway! THLs give a direct warning to pilots that it is unsafe to depart from a runway! efaros gives a direct warning to pilots that it is unsafe to land on a runway! v By flashing existing Precision Approach Path Indicators (PAPIs)! OpEval Training-3!

Runway Incursion Distribution! Most runway incursions result from pilot deviations. Any occurrence at an aerodrome involving the incorrect presence of an aircraft, vehicle or person on the protected area of a surface designated for the landing and take off of aircraft! OpEval Training-4!

Objective of RWSL and efaros! Per NTSB s MOST WANTED:! Give immediate warnings of probable collisions/incursions directly to flight crews in the cockpit.! RELs warn unsafe to enter/cross RWY! THLs warn unsafe to depart from RWY! RILs warn unsafe to cross RWY intersection! efaros warns unsafe to land! OpEval Training-5!

Goal of efaros:! Prevent Runway Accidents and Incursions! Example: LAX 1991 landover accident! Forgetting is a human factor routinely found in operational errors by air traffic controllers that cause incidents virtually every day in our nation's air traffic system. This type of human error has also been identified in past accidents. For example, on February 1, 1991, a USAir Boeing 737 collided with a Skywest Metroliner at the Los Angeles International Airport, killing 34 passengers and crew. This accident occurred, in part, because the air traffic controller cleared the USAir airplane to land about 3 minutes after she had cleared the Skywest airplane onto the same runway to hold for departure...! v Quote Reference: Testimony of Jim Hall, Chairman NTSB, April 16, 1997! Accidents with aircraft not exiting the runway after landing while a subsequent landing is in progress (aka tail chase )! efaros would warn landers! Accidents with aircraft or vehicle crossing the runway while landing is in progress!! efaros would warn landers; RELs designed to prevent such events by warning crossers! OpEval Training-6!

efaros and RWSL! High Level Block Diagram! Surveillance! Transponder! Multilateration! MIT/LL! Light Control Logic! Field Lighting System! PAPIs! efaros! ASDE-3! ASR-9! RELs! THLs! RWSL Test Display with efaros, RELs and THLs on (red) due to traffic! OpEval Training-7!

Drawings of RWSL & efaros! Runway Entrance Lights (RELs)! Enhanced Final Approach Runway Occupancy Signal (efaros)! Takeoff Hold Lights (THLs)! Runway Intersection Lights (RILs)! Note: Assessment of RWSL double-row THLs and RILs and efaros flashing PAPIs is TBD.! OpEval Training-8!

efaros: Pilots View! Indicates runway unsafe for landing! Flashing PAPIs if runway not safe for landing! Otherwise steady (glide path indication only)! OpEval Training-9!

efaros Operational Definitions! efaros is a pilot notification system of runway status for pilots on final approach to landing! When runway is occupied and approaching aircraft has reached the arming distance (default is 1.5 nmi)! PAPIs begin flashing to pilots! Red bar shown on RWSL display in tower! When aircraft is within.5 nmi of landing threshold and runway is occupied! PAPIs begin or continue flashing to pilots! Red bar shown on RWSL display in tower flashes red and white! Audible advisory sounds in tower efaros (RWY designator)!! OpEval Training-10!

efaros Operational Protocol for Pilots! When efaros acquisition point is reached! Attempt to see traffic on runway! v If seen, evaluate the situation then proceed with caution! v If not seen, then prepare to contact ATC at contact point! When efaros contact point is reached after passing acquisition point! Attempt to see traffic on runway! v If seen, evaluate the situation then proceed with caution! v If not seen, then contact ATC to verify landing clearance and prepare for an immediate go-around! v If ATC does not verify landing clearance promptly, go around! v If ATC cancels the landing clearance, go around!! OpEval Training-11!

efaros Arming and Activation Regions Defined! OpEval Training-12! Illustration of efaros arming and activation regions on DFW-East (not to scale)! There is one arming region on each efaros-instrumented runway! Arming regions for 17R/35R and 17C/ 35C shown in light blue! Start of region is 3nmi from r/w threshold! Arming distance is the same for Enhanced and Active efaros! v TBD based on user feedback! v Default is 1.5 nmi from RWY threshold! There are multiple activation regions that cover runway in both directions! Example activation regions for 17R/35R and 17C/35C shown in green (overruns not included)! When LAHSO is used, activation region ends at the LAHSO line! Shape of activation region bumps out in all areas where high-speed taxiways meet the runway! To address issue of aircraft re-entering the runway after having started to exit at an angled taxiway! Also to allow for imprecision in aircraft or vehicle position data!

High Level Operational Requirements! efaros must have aircraft in position for landing (in arming region) and aircraft or vehicle on runway (in activation region) in order to turn on! efaros must turn off once either condition is no longer met! efaros must not interfere with normal safe operations! efaros must operate automatically for each operation! No controller action required!! efaros must accurately depict that it is unsafe to land! OpEval Training-13!

efaros Operational Concept Figure! OpEval Training-14!

efaros Locations at DFW! efaros deployment planned for 18R/36L, 17R/35L, and 17C/35C! Need for efaros noted in FAA Runway Safety Blueprint 2004! When pilots are on final approach for landing, in certain conditions such as periods of reduced visibility, it is difficult to distinguish an aircraft that is already on the runway and pointing directly away from an arriving aircraft. A visual method to warn pilots (operating in sufficient visibility) that the runway is occupied would reduce the opportunity for collision.! OpEval Training-15!

New efaros advisory in ATC TWR! AMASS alert is currently male voice! Mandatory go around issued by ATC! v Warning, runway 18L go around New visual efaros advisory on RWSL displays! Red bar or flashing red/white bar adjacent to the runway! New audible efaros alarm and advisory from small speaker! Brief tone for audible alarm, default is 1 second sine wave! Tone followed by female voice advisory! v FAROS runway 18L! v Presented once! New visual indication of efaros not in service! No FAROS to be displayed on the RWSL display! Similar to current No RWSL display! One small speaker was added to the RWSL hardware to sound efaros audible advisory! Other equipment is same as used for RWSL Operational Evaluation of RELs and THLs at DFW! OpEval Training-16!

efaros Operational Evaluation Issues! Adaptation parameters were adjusted to meet tempo of DFW operations while providing direct warning to pilots! Default adaptation parameters have been tuned to! Arming distance is 1.5 nmi from runway threshold! Acquisition point is 500 ft AGL or about 1.5 nmi from landing threshold! Contact point is 300 ft AGL or about.75 nmi from landing threshold! OpEval Training-17!

efaros Anomalies! Definition of runway status light anomalies:! False Activation (FA)! v Light flashing when efaros advisory should not be in effect! Missed Detection (MD)! v Light not flashing when efaros advisory should be in effect! Interference (I)! v Communication interference occurs when efaros causes crew to contact ATC before descending to the contact point! v Operational interference occurs when efaros causes crew to interrupt a normal, safe landing below the contact point! v Increased controller and/or pilot workload! OpEval Training-18!

efaros Operational Evaluation Summary! Goal! Expose efaros to real surveillance with live operations and expert observation by ATC and pilots! Method! Evaluate accuracy of efaros advisories, given ATC clearances and aircraft or vehicle movement! Observe and record instances of anomalous light operation! Results! Assess possible interference with normal, safe operations and degradation of airport capacity! Estimate effectiveness of efaros in preventing runway incursions! Determine operational suitability of efaros at DFW! v Please provide your feedback on efaros. Take the confidential survey at https://efaros.ll.mit.edu! OpEval Training-19!