COMPATIBILITY STUDY A380 - GRU TADEU NEVES 1/29
TIMELINE -GRUAIRPORT 1 Airport to has CAT IIIa operation in Brazil. 29/06/2014 Inauguration of TERMINAL 3 11/05/2014 Auction of Guarulho s Airport. 06/02/2012 Approval of the Operational Transfer Plan (PTO). Phase I starts : GRUAirport assist Infraero 14/06/2012 08/2012 Signature of Concession Contract R$ 17 billions Concession takes over airport management 15/11/2012 15/02/2013 Phase II starts: GRU take over airport operation and Infraero assist. 18/11/2013 10/2014 Beginning of Retrofit of terminal 1 and 2. Receive the Operational Certification. Operation of B747-8 authorized. 2/29
CONCESSION CONTRACT *8.4.1 Widening the Runway and Taxiway to bear Code F aircraft operation. IN ADDITION TO THE ADJUSTMENTS, OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WERE DONE TO ACOMODATE THE AIRCRAFT CODE F IN THE AIRPORT: ADJUSTEMENTS/IMPROVEMENTS Stabilish a standard Route Widening the runway Widening the taxiways Runway holding point Position/Airbridges 3/29
TWY G TWY Q TWY K A380 OPERATION STANDARD ROUTE TWY A RWY 09L/27R - 3.700m RWY 09R/27L 3.000m DEFINITION OF A STANDARD ROUTE TWY A TWY G TWY K TWY Q RWY 09L/27R 4/29
60 M 45 m RUNWAY 09L/27R RWY 09L/27R - 3.700m 09L/27R RUNWAY 09L/27R Length: 3.700 m Width: 45 m 7,5M SHOULDER 45M PISTA 7,5 M SHOULDER 7,5 m Shoulder: PCN: 7,5 m pavement 85/F/B/W/T 5/29
75 M 60 m 75 M CODE F RUNWAYS 09L/27R - RUNWAY 7,5 m 45 m 7,5M SHOULDER 45M PISTA 7,5 M SHOULDER 7,5 m 7,5 m FULL COMPLIANCE ICAO/RBAC RUNWAY 7,5M SHOULDER 60 M RUNWAY 7,5 M SHOULDER 7,5 m 6/29
RUNWAY BENCHMARKETING FULL COMPLIANCE RUNWAY Full runway closure for at least 210 days Lights system replacement Land/Soil Swamp Big impact at Air traffic Number of flights reduction Flights cancelled and bigs delayed Price ticket increase Risk of Collapse with only one runway BENCHMARKETING JFK New York Experience 4 months of one runway closure for widening (4 rwy) Big impact in Air Traffic Delays and cancelled flights Increase the Operacional cost increase taxi time and wait for departure Lost of connection and increase the MCT Dubai Airport ITA - Technological Inst. of Aeronautics With only one runway the movements fall from 48 to 35. More than 20% of flight must be cancelled with the actual demand. Airlines lose money with the smaller runway available. Impact in the others Airports Logistic problem from/to Airports DECEA PLANORCON ENG. Complex logistic problems to cross taxiways in operation. Underground is a swamp. Demolish the light system and the shoulder existent. 7/29
75 M 45 m COMPATIBILITY RUNWAY 45 M + 15 SHOULDER A380 AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY GROUP (AACG) GROUP of European Aviation Authoritys (France, Germany, Netherlands and England) CASA - POSITION ON AIRBUS A380 OPERATIONS AT CODE E AERODROMES Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority FAA ENGINEERING BRIEF NO. 65A USE OF 45 M WIDE RUNWAYS FOR AIRBUS A380 OPERATIONS Federal Aviation Administration - USA NEW ZELAND INTERIM AERODROME REQUIREMENTS FOR THE A380 BENCHMARKETING OUTER 7,5M SHOULDER SHOULDER 7,5M 45M RUNWAY 7,5 M SHOULDER OUTER SHOULDER 7,5M 7,5 m 7,5 m 8/29
6 CATEGORY COMPATIBILITY A380 BENCHMARKETING NEW AIRPORTS NEW AIRPORTS NEW RUNWAYS INFRA ALREADY OK ADD OLD SHOULDER AS RUNWAY OUTER SHOULDER ADJUSTMENT RUNWAY WIDDENING Doha - DOH Bangkok - BKK (Suvarnabhumi Airport) Guangzhou CAN (Baiyun) NEW RUNWAYS Dellhi DEL (Gandhi) Shangai PVG (Pudong) Beijing PEK (Beijing) Osaka KIX (Kansai) Shenzhen SZX (Shenzhen Bao na) Barcelona BCN (El Prat) ADD OLD SHOULDER AS RUNWAY Mumbai BOM (Chhatrapati Shivaji) Melbourne MEL (Melbourne) RUNWAY WIDDENING New York JFK (John F. Kennedy) INFRA ALREADY OK Hong Kong HKG (Chek Lap Kok) Moscow SVO (Sheremetyevo) Seul ICN (Incheon) Los Angeles LAX (Angeles) San Francisco SFO Miami MIA Frankfurt FRA Johhanesburgo JNB Paris CDG (Paris Charles de Gaulle) Munich MUC Jeddah JED Kuala Lumpur KUL Abudabhi AUH Madrid MAD (Suarez Madrid Barajas Airport) Singapoure SIN (Changi) Toronto YYZ (Toronto Pearson) Zurich Airport (Zurique) OUTER SHOULDER ADJUSTMENT Houston IAH (George Bush) Atlanta ATL (Harsfield-Jackson) Washington DC IAD (Ronald Reagan) Mauritius MRU (Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam) Abidjan ABJ (Port Bouet) London Gatwick LGW (Londres Gatwick) London Heatrow LHR (Londres Heatrow) Manchester MAN (Manchester) Amsterdan AMS (Schiphol) Kwait KWI (Kuwait) Sydney SYD (Sydney) Auckland AKL (Auckland) Perth PER (Perth) Dusseldorf DUS (Dusseldorf) Copenhagen CPH (Copenhagen) 9/29
BENCHMARKING JFK AIRPORT WORKS FOR WIDENING 3 OF 4 RUNWAYS WERE EXTENDED TO 60 M Seats available reduced Delays Flights Cancelled Airlines cost increased MCT increased Passangers Complains Air Traffic impact NEWS 10/29
BENCHMARKING JFK AIRPORT JIM STEVEN, NEW YORK PROJECT MANAGER Problem 1: Replace the runway the runway as quickly as possible while minimizing impact on travelers and airlines. Solution: Most runway replacement projects are completed a small section at a time, with work only taking place during the airport s off-hours, usually overnight and on weekends. For a strip as long as the Bay Runway, however, Steven says it would have taken as long as four years to finish the job, with the looming potential for disruptions to air traffic throughout that time. Planners chose a one-shot solution which will be less painful in the long-term, closing the runway for a four month stretch and working on it 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Three runways remain open to air traffic, and airlines agreed to maintain their slower winter schedules to help prevent bottlenecks. Problem 2: With hundreds of workers and as many as 75 construction vehicles moving in and out of the work area several times a day, every day, planners had to enable them to flow as smoothly as possible. Transversing the secure areas of the airport would require time-intensive searches with every trip, and adding that many vehicles to the airport s busy taxiways and runways would also disrupt air traffic. Solution: Project organizers cordoned off the Bay Runway with 2 1/2 miles of perimeter fence, separating it from the secure, active parts of the airport, eliminating the need for searches. They also built miles of temporary access roads to make it easy for trucks to move from exterior roads straight to the job site without disrupting fliers heading to and from the airport or aircraft movements on taxiways SOURCE: http://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/a5832/jfk-airport-runway-replacement/ 11/29
BENCHMARKING MELBOURNE AIRPORT WORKS FOR WIDENING START: 05 th April of 2005 TIME: 29 days THE AIRPORT WAS CLOSED FOR 29 DAYS. JUST BUILT THE SHOULDER MAINTENECE IN LIGHTS NEW LIGHTING SYSTEM 12/29
75 M 45 m GRU DECISION OUTER 7,5M SHOULDER SHOULDER 7,5M 45M RUNWAY 7,5 M SHOULDER OUTER SHOULDER 7,5M 7,5 m 7,5 m 13/29
A380 - WORKS 06/04/15 TO 15/10/2015 MONDAY TO SATURDAY RUNWAY CLOSURE 01:00 TO 07:00 LT 14/29
A380 - WORKS 2014 2015 15/29
7,5 m 7,5 m 75 M 45 m A380 - CERTIFICATION PCN - ACN RWY 09L/27R - 3.700m 09L/27R 7,5M SHOULDER 45M PISTA 7,5 M SHOULDER A RWY shoulder should be prepared or constructed so as to be capable, in the event of an aeroplane running off the RWY, of supporting the aeroplane without inducing structural damage to the aeroplane and of supporting ground vehicles which may operate on the shoulder RUNWAY 09L/27R Length: Width: Shoulder: + PCN: 3.700 m 45 m 7,5 m pavemented 7,5 m pavemented outer shoulder 85/F/B/W/T ITEM PCN ACN (A380 570t) CONDITION RWY 85 67 No restriction TWY 77 67 No restriction APRONS 67 67 No restriction 16/29
90 m 120 m A380 - CERTIFICATION ADJUSTMENT RUNWAY HOLDING POSITION RWY 09L/27R - 3.700m RWY 09R/27L - 3.000m 2014 2015 RUNWAY-HOLDING POSITION AND MANDATORY INSTRUCTION MARKING Runway holding position (Stop bar) realocation to 120m from the runway center line. Markings adjustments Obstacle removed from the runway strips *09R/27L The Runway holding position was realocated to 120m as well. RUNWAY-HOLDING POSITION ICAO/RBAC 154 Table 3-2. Minimum distance from the runway centre line to a holding bay, runway-holding position or road-holding position c. Where the code letter is F, this distance should be 107.5 m. Note. The distance of 107.5 m for code number 4 where the code letter is F is based on an aircraft with a tail height of 24 m, a distance from the nose to the highest part of the tail of 62.2 m and a nose height of 10 m holding at an angle of 45 or more with respect to the runway centre line, being clear of the obstacle free zone. a. If a holding bay, runway-holding position or road-holding position is at a lower elevation compared to the threshold, the distance may be decreased 5 m for every metre the bay or holding position is lower than the threshold, contingent upon not infringing the inner transitional surface. b. This distance may need to be increased to avoid interference with radio navigation aids, particularly the glide path and localizer facilities. Information on critical and sensitive areas of ILS and MLS is contained in Annex 10, Volume I, Attachments C and G, respectively (see also 3.12.6). Note 1. The distance of 90 m for code number 3 or 4 is based on an aircraft with a tail height of 20 m, a distance from the nose to the highest part of the tail of 52.7 m and a nose height of 10 m holding at an angle of 45 or more with respect to the runway centre line, being clear of the obstacle free zone and not accountable for the calculation of OCA/H. RUNWAY STRIP 3.4 Runway strip A strip including a precision approach runway shall, wherever praticable, extend laterraly to a distance of at least: - 150 m where the code number is 3 or 4. 3.4.7. No fixed object, other than visual aids required for air navigation purposes and satisfying the relevant frangibility requirement in Chapter 5, shall be permitted on a runway strip: a) Witthin 77,5 of the runway centre line of a precision approach runway category I, II or III where the code number is 4 and the code letter is F. 17/29
45 m 23 m 60 m 25 m TWY G TWY Q A380 - CERTIFICATION ADJUSTMENT - TAXIWAYS 2,7KM OF CONSTRUCTION AND EXTENSION OF TAXIWAY A AND Q TWY A WORK 1 ADJUSTMENTS Widening the taxiways of standard routes. TWY A TWY Q TWY G Widening the shoulder Drainage channel adjustments Light replacement 11 m 11 m DRENAGEM 17,5 m 17,5 m DRENAGEM SUBTERRÂNEA 18/29
45 m 23 m 60 m 25 m TWY G TWY Q A380 - CERTIFICATION ADJUSTMENT - TAXIWAYS 1,2 KM OF ADJUSMENT IN TAXIWAY A AND G TWY A WORK 2 TAXIWAY A ADJUSTMENTS Widening the taxiways of standard routes. TWY A TWY Q TWY G Widening the shoulder Drainage channel adjustments Light replacement 11 m 11 m DRENAGEM 17,5 m 17,5 m DRENAGEM SUBTERRÂNEA 19/29
TWY G TWY Q A380 - CERTIFICATION ADJUSTMENT - TAXIWAYS TWY A WORK 2 DISPLACED THRESHOLD Due to the widening works of TWY G, the threshold 09L had to be displaced by 400 m. This displacement reduced the runway dimensions, resulting in a NOTAM with reduction / revision of declared distances. *RUNWAY restricted only for TAKE OFF 20/29
APRON 6 A380 - CERTIFICATION ADJUSTMENT - APRON 13 6 5 4 3 2 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 N POSITION BRIDGE Uper Deck TERMINAL PCN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 601 2 3 Compatible 602 2 3 Compatible 603 2 3 Compatible 604 2 3 Compatible 605 2 3 Compatible 606 Remote - Compatible 607 Remote - Compatible 608 Remote - Compatible 609 Remote - Compatible 610 Remote - Compatible 611 Remote - Compatible 612 Remote - Compatible 203 Remote - Compatible 21/29
A380 - CERTIFICATION ADJUSTMENT APRON/AIRBRIDGE 22/29
A380 - CERTIFICATION AERODROME RESCUE AND FIREFIGHTER (ARFF) REQUIREMENTS - ANAC 279 FOR CATEGORY 10 WATER WATER DISCHARGE RATE DRY CHEMICAL POWDER DRY C.P. DISCHARGE RATE 32.300 L 11.200 L/minute 450 kg 4,5 kg/second AIRCRAFT RESCUE AND FIRE FIGHTING (ARFF) VEHICLES PANTHER TITAN IVECO YEAR: 2014 12.500 WATER 1.500 FOAM 250 kg DRY CHEMICAL POWDER 2 units 2 units YEAR: 1994 11.355 L WATER 1.514 FOAM 227kg DRY CHEMICAL POWDER YEAR: 2000 5.700 L WATER 750 L FOAM 250 kg DRY CHEMICAL POWDER 3 units AIRCRAFT RESCUE AND FIRE FIGHTING DISCHARGE DRY CHEMICAL VEHICLES WATER DISCHARGE RATE RATE POWDER 2 Panthers e 1 Titan 35.355 L 17.700 l/m 727 kg 28 kg/s 1 Panther e 2 Titans 35.210 L 17.400 l/m 704 kg 26 kg/s 2 Panther e 2 Ivecos 36.400 L 18.000 l/m 750 kg 30 kg/s 1 Panther, 1 Titan e 2 Ivec 35.255 L 17.700 l/m 977 kg 38 kg/s 23/29
A380 - HAZARDS, RISKS RISK AND HAZARDS ANALYSIS RUNWAY - Excursion (Overrun or Veer off) - Damage from the infestion of FODebris. - Damage to te sinage and markings - Pavement resistance - Width of the runway - Strips - Colision Aircraft x Aircraft/Vehicle/Object TAXIWAY - Excursion - Damage from the infestion of FODebris. - Damage to te sinage and markings - Pavement resistance - Width of the taxiways - Strips - Colision Aircraft x Aircraft/Vehicle/Object APRON - Apron design - Airbridge operation - Pavement resistance - Wing Spam and Distance AIRPORT - Terminal Capacity - Bagage Handling/Reconciliation System - Aerodrome Rescue Fire Fighter - GROUND HANDLING COMPARATIVE - A380 AND B747-400 (Project Aircraft) COMPARATIVE - A380 AND B747-8 (BIGGEST AIRCRAFT) 24/29
A380 - HAZARDS, RISKS INGESTION OF FOD IDENTIFIED HAZARD: HAZARD: DEFENSES: FOD (DEBRIS) INGESTION OF FOD WORKS TO ACCOMMODATE THE A380 KPI AND CONTROL PROGRAMS DAILY INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MITIGATION ACTION STABILISH STANDARD ROUTE INSPECTIONS IN ROUTE OUT FROM STANDARD ROUTE INSPECTIONS IN FIRST 10 OPERATIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTION ARRIVAL DEPARTURE FLIGHT INSPECTION LANDING INSPECTION TAXI FOD Signs light system Grass Pavement Dust and small stones TAXI INSPECTION TAKEOFF INSPECTION FLIGHT When A380 use one route that is not part of standard route, one inspection must be realized at the route it used. 25/29
A380 - HAZARDS, RISKS DIMENSIONS WING SPAM IDENTIFIED HAZARD: HAZARD: DEFENSES: WING SPAM COLLISION WITH OBSTACLE (INFRA/OBJECT/AIRCRAFTS) WORKS TO ACCOMMODATE THE A380 AUTO. DOCKING GUIDANCE SYSTEM STANDARD OPERATIONS MITIGATION ACTION WING WALKER STABILISH FORBIDEN ROUTES PUSH BACK MUST BE USED IN DIFFERENT POSITIONS INSPECTIONS TAXI FOR A380 FORBIDEN FORBIDEN ROUTES CHART ACCESS FROM TO TWY B FROM TWY FF FORBIDEN ACCESS THE TWY Q TO TWY A FROM TWY B FORBIDEN TAXI FOR A380 FORBIDEN 26/29
A380 - HAZARDS, RISKS DISTANCE BETWEEN THE CENTER LINE OF TWY B AND RWY 09L/27R IDENTIFIED HAZARD: HAZARD: DEFENSES: DISTANCE BETWEEN TWY B AND RWY 09L OBSTACLE AT THE RUNWAY STRIP RUNWAY STRIP CLEAR RBAC 154 AERODROME WITH ATC SURFACE MOVEMENT GUIDANCE CONTROL SYSTEM (SMGCS) MITIGATION ACTION NOT ALLOWED OPERATIONS OF CODE F IN TWY B AND RWY 09L/27R SIMULTANEOUS ATC AGREEMENT FOR A380 OPERATION DISTANCE BETWEEN WINGS AT TWY B AND RWY 09L/27R 27/29
A380 - HAZARDS, RISKS DISTANCE BETWEEN THE CENTER LINE OF TWY B AND RWY 09L/27R IDENTIFIED HAZARD: HAZARD: DEFENSES: DISTANCE BETWEEN TWY A AND TWY B WING COLLISION (WINGTIP) MARKINGS AND SIGNS AERODROME WITH ATC SURFACE MOVEMENT GUIDANCE CONTROL SYSTEM (SMGCS) MITIGATION ACTION NOT ALLOWED OPERATIONS OF CODE F IN TWY B AND TWY A SIMULTANEOUS ATC AGREEMENT FOR A380 OPERATION ESTABILISH STANDARD ROUTES DISTANCE BETWEEN WINGS AT TWY B AND TWY A 28/29
A380 - CERTIFICATION Special Operation Authorization published Diario Oficial da União - 28 th October 2015. First landing was in 14th November 2016, the regular operation started at 26th March 2017, with one flight every day. The operation is a success, after more than 180 movements, without causing any impact. 29/29
7,5 m 7,5 m 75 M 45 m TWY G TWY Q TWY K NEXT STEPS TWY A RWY 09L/27R - 3.700m RWY 09R/27L 3.000m Certificate the runway 09R/27L for A380 to use as contingency. 09L/27R 7,5M SHOULDER 45M PISTA 7,5 M SHOULDER 30/29
Thank You TADEU NEVES Airside Operation Tadeu.neves@gru.com.br 31/29