MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT MAY gatwickairport.com/performance

Similar documents
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT OCTOBER gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT APRIL gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT MARCH gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT FEBRUARY gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT OCTOBER gatwickairport.com/performance

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER gatwickairport.com/performance

Performance monitoring report for first half of 2016

Performance monitoring report for the second half of 2015/16

Performance monitoring report for first half of 2015

Performance monitoring report 2017/18

Performance monitoring report for 2014/15

Departure Punctuality - Sep-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Departure Punctuality - Jun-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Departure Punctuality - Dec-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Departure Punctuality - Aug-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Gatwick Airport (LGW)

Departure Punctuality - May-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Number of complaints decided where a financial remedy awarded. Number of complaints received others

Operational Performance Reporting Manchester Airport August 2018

Operational Performance Reporting Manchester Airport March 2018

Operational Performance Reporting Manchester Airport January 2018

Departure Punctuality - Apr-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Departure Punctuality - Oct-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Remedy awarded (complaints decided in qtr)

Departure Punctuality - Feb-17. Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months

Punctuality for may 2018 per airline

Punctuality for june 2018 per airline

Punctuality for july 2018 per airline

Punctuality for march 2014 per airline

Punctuality for september 2018 per airline

Punctuality for february 2017 per airline

Punctuality for may 2014 per airline

Punctuality for november 2018 per airline

Punctuality for september 2013 per airline

Punctuality for april 2018 per airline

Punctuality for june 2014 per airline

Punctuality for july 2015 per airline

Punctuality for june 2015 per airline

I am writing in respect of your recent request of 5 February 2018, for the release of information held by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

The Heathrow Service Quality Rebate Scheme

Punctuality for july 2012 per airline

I am writing in respect of your recent request of 10 January 2018, for the release of information held by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

Customer Relations Programme

Punctuality for february 2018 per airline

Half Year Traffic Highlights

Punctuality for october 2017 per airline

Headlines S19 Start vs. S18 Start vs. S18 End

Punctuality for august 2017 per airline

I am writing in respect of your recent request of 11 January 2018, for the release of information held by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

Gatwick Airport (LGW)

GATWICK AIRPORT LGW WINTER 2013/14 (W13) Start of season

Undertakings provided to CAA under Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002

Punktlighed for september 2018 pr. flyselskab

Punctuality for october 2012 per airline

Facts & Figures. Non-US Airline Traffic Aircraft Data. Aircraft Values. US Consumer Complaints February US Fuel Cost And Consumption

Lyon St Exupéry Airport LYS/LFLL

The contents of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of COHOR.

Heathrow Airport (LHR)

Undertakings provided to CAA under Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002

Getting to Salamanca FROM MADRID AIRPORT

Start of Season Report Nice Côte d Azur Airport Summer Nice Côte d Azur Airport NCE/LFMN. Summer Start Of Season Report

Low Fares The Engine For Passenger Growth 3 rd April 2003

Group Flights. Conducted by YouGov on behalf of Civil Aviation Authority. Fieldwork Dates: 28th December th January 2018

The contents of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of COHOR.

Lyon St Exupéry Airport LYS/LFLL

Special assistance at Gatwick. If you need a little extra help, we re here to assist

Flight Performance Team Annual Report 2016

LCCs: in it for the long-haul?

Punktlighed for august 2017 pr. flyselskab

Logan International Airport

Prediction of Skytrax airline rankings, short formula (2e)

Monarch airlines response to the CAA s review on Gatwick s commitment framework

Undertakings provided to CAA under Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002

STANSTED AIRPORT LIMITED REGULATORY ACCOUNTS PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH Financial Review...1. Performance Report...

Persons with reduced mobility, hidden and non-hidden disabilities Users Guide January 2019

Start of Season Report Nice Côte d Azur Airport Winter Nice Côte d Azur Airport NCE/LFMN. Winter Start Of Season Report

Slots. The benefits of strategic slot management. Richard Matthews Slot strategy & scheduling manager. 8 th March 2013

Heathrow Airport. Airport Charges for 2013/14. Consultation Document

Ancillary Revenue per Passenger for 2013 was $16, Up Nearly 129% from 2007

One of the world s largest, most experienced aviation consultancies

Bristol Airport (BRS)

SPEECH BY WILLIE WALSH, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP. Annual General Meeting, Thursday June 14, Check against delivery

STUDY OF THE OPTIMUM FLEET FOR A LCC (LOW-COST-CARRIER)

Gatwick Airport Limited. Results for six months ended 30 September 2012

NOTICE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR DISABLED PERSONS AND PERSONS WITH REDUCED MOBILITY UNDER SECTION 85 OF THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT 2012

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Persons with reduced mobility, hidden and non-hidden disabilities Users Guide March 2018

Quality of Service Monitoring Dublin Airport October - December 2015

For SOP the CAA holds data for the time period 1 August 2016 to 31 December 2016.

Quality of Service Monitoring at Dublin Airport

Accessible Air Travel : Airport services to disabled and reduced mobility passengers

trends bulletin

Moving Towards a Customer Centric Approach. Dr. Philippe Villard Head, Policy & Economics

The path of Rome Fiumicino Airport to operational excellence. EURO Aviation IT Summit Budapest September 28, 2018

Flybe: Delivery and Future Direction

GATWICK AIRPORT LIMITED RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2014

Ancillary Revenues. Dr Frankie O Connell

A-CDM FOR REGIONAL AIRPORTS CONCEPT VALIDATION DOCUMENTO PÚBLICO

Transcription:

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT gatwickairport.com/performance

DOCUMENT HISTORY Monthly Performance Report Published Republished Page Reference Metric Reason for Change May 01/05/2017 01/06/2017 12 Pier Service - North Terminal May 01/05/2017 01/06/2017 12 Pier Service - South Terminal The PSL score was recalculated from 96.57% to 96.58% to correct the application of fleet optimisation. Fleet optimisation is where an airline is operating flights arriving in one terminal and departing from another or when the the type of traffic is not suitable for the stand as a result of the airlines schedule integration The PSL score was recalculated from 97.63% to 97.46% to correct the application of fleet optimisation. Fleet optimisation is where an airline is operating flights arriving in one terminal and departing from another or when the the type of traffic is not suitable for the stand as a result of the airlines schedule integration

At Gatwick we are committed to ensuring all areas of our business live up to the expectations of our passengers, our partners and our regulator. As part of this commitment we publish monthly reports which we have now brought together into one easy to follow report. You can view or download these reports at any time at gatwickairport.com/performance If you have any comments or feedback to help us improve please send them to customer.services@gatwickairport.com CONTENTS Core Service Standards Airline Service Standards PRM Service and Notification On-time Performance ACI Airport Service Quality Ranking > > > > >

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS departure lounge seating availability 3.80 4.07 4.05 Ease of finding a seat Results from our passenger surveys Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor 3.80 3.93 3.90 airport cleanliness 4.00 4.06 4.09 Overall cleanliness of the terminal Results from our passenger surveys Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor 4.00 4.14 4.15 Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 4

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS airport wayfinding 4.10 4.13 4.17 Ease of finding your way around our airport Results from our passenger surveys Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor 4.10 4.25 4.26 airport flight information 4.20 4.37 4.40 Accuracy and ease of finding flight information Results from our passenger surveys Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor 4.20 4.46 4.49 Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 5

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS waiting time at central security search 95.00% 95.36% 97.26% Percentage of time when passengers queued for 5 minutes or less 95.00% 95.23% 98.15% The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for security including ticket presentation and facial capture, up to the point that the passenger reaches the security roller bed. waiting time at central security search 98.00% 99.47% 99.92% Percentage of time when passengers queued for 15 minutes or less 98.00% 99.75% The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for security including ticket presentation and facial capture, up to the point that the passenger reaches the security roller bed. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 6

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS waiting time at central security search 0 0 0 Instance where a single queue is measured at 30 minutes or more 0 0 0 The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for security including ticket presentation and facial capture, up to the point that the passenger reaches the security roller bed. flight connections security search 95.00% 99.12% Percentage of time when passengers queued for 10 minutes or less 95.00% 98.79% 99.60% This measure applies to 95% of core hours. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 7

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS staff security search 95.00% 99.96% 99.97% Percentage of time when staff queued for 5 minutes or less 95.00% 99.79% 99.77% This measure applies to 95% of core hours. North Terminal Staff performance calculated as average performance of both search areas. external control posts security search EXTERNAL CONTROL POSTS 95.00% 99.97% Percentage of time when queue time is 15 minutes or less This measure applies to 95% of core hours. Performance for the Northen Approach Gate. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 8

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS passenger sensitive equipment priority availability 99.41% 99.73% Availability of priority equipment including lifts, escalators and passenger conveyors 99.63% 99.75% This covers instances of equipment breakdown or unplanned maintenance affecting the availability of priority Passenger Sensitive Equipment (PSE) during core operational hours. passenger sensitive equipment general availability 99.53% 99.72% Availability of general equipment including lifts, escalators and passenger conveyors 99.62% 99.83% This covers instances of equipment breakdown or unplanned maintenance affecting the availability of general Passenger Sensitive Equipment (PSE) during core operational hours. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. 9

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS baggage outbound baggage process 97.00% 99.30% *99.64% Percentage of flights when bags are delivered to the airline ground handler 25 minutes or more before the scheduled time of departure 97.00% 99.44% *99.48% This is a daily event based measure, the score shown relates to the lowest daily performance baggage outbound baggage process 99.92% 99.97% Percentage of flights when bags are delivered to the airline ground handler 25 minutes or more before the scheduled time of departure 99.91% 99.96% This is a monthly average measure Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. measured over the last 12 months. * On 26, there was a baggage system fault which resulted in a poor baggage service for airlines and passengers that was not reflected in the automated performance measurement. A CSS rebate will be paid by GAL in relation to this day s baggage performance. 10

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS airfield stand availability 99.90% 99.98% Percentage of time when aircraft stands are available Stand availability is measured between the following agreed core hours: 00:00-11:00 and 19:00-00:00 99.85% 99.97% airfield jetty/airbridge availability 99.85% 99.83% Percentage of time when aircraft jetties (airbridges) are available for aircraft boarding/disembarking 99.79% 99.52% Jetty availability is measured between the following agreed core hours: 00:00-11:00 and 19:00-00:00 Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA measured over the last 12 months. 11

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS airfield pier service 95.00% 96.44% 96.58% Percentage of time when stands with pier service are available as opposed to remote stands 95.00% 97.70% 97.46% This measure is based on the total number of passenger movements (arrivals and departures). If a passenger is able to walk into the pier, then the stand is classed as a pier served stand. airfield fixed electrical ground power 99.84% 99.77% Percentage of time when fixed electrical ground power (FEGP) units are available for aircraft 99.85% 99.96% FEGP availability is measured between the following agreed core hours: 00:00-11:00 and 19:00-00:00. FEGP powers aircraft when on a stand allowing engines to be turned off. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA measured over the last 12 months. 12

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS inter-terminal shuttle one shuttle available INTER 99.96% Percentage of time when one shuttle with a minimum of one car is available Core hours vary dependent on agreed maintenance periods. inter-terminal shuttle two shuttles available INTER 97.00% 99.32% 99.62% Percentage of time when two shuttles with a minimum of one car each are available Core hours vary dependent on agreed maintenance periods. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA measured over the last 12 months. 13

CORE SERVICE STANDARDS arrivals baggage reclaim carousels 99.88% 99.98% Availability of our baggage reclaim carousels for arriving flights 99.86% 99.91% For information on the arrivals baggage performance please refer to the Airline Service Standards section of this report. aerodrome congestion term AIRPORT OVERALL 0 0 0 An event occurs which is the responsibility of the airport or its agents which causes an impact in terms of a number of aircraft movements lost or deferred Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA measured over the last 12 months. 14

AIRLINE SERVICE STANDARDS small/medium aircraft baggage performance time for small/medium aircraft last bag delivered within 35 minutes Time from the on-chocks time supplied by the airlines handling agents to delivery to the baggage carousel. Airlines achieving 95% or higher are considered to have met the target successfully. AIRPORT OVERALL SMALL/ MEDIUM AIRCRAFT Flights within target time in 95.73% AIRLINES 1-10 BY VOLUME OF FLIGHTS Airline & Handling Agent easyjet British Airways BA GGS Norwegian NORWEGIAN Ryanair Vueling Number of flights 4,049 98.47% 176 95.45% 1,329 92.70% 174 54.02% 843 99.05% 173 97.69% 423 278 Flights within target time 99.05% 97.48% Airline & Handling Agent Aurigny Thomson Airways Aer Lingus TAP Air Portugal Monarch Number of flights 103 Flights within target time 74.76% 83 96.39% Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines. Baggage performance is measured between the following agreed core hours: 0400-2200 from May to October for both terminals, 0500-2100 between November to May for North Terminal and 0500-2200 between November to May for South Terminal. 15

AIRLINE SERVICE STANDARDS small/medium aircraft baggage performance time for small/medium aircraft last bag delivered within 35 minutes AIRLINES 11-21 BY VOLUME OF FLIGHTS Airline & Handling Agent Number of flights Flights within target time Airline & Handling Agent Number of flights Flights within target time Flybe 82 98.78% Smart Wings 47 Iberia Express 62 93.55% Thomas Cook 34 85.29% Air Europa Líneas Aéreas 61 98.36% Royal Air Maroc 33 96.97% Ukraine International Airlines 57 85.96% Aeroflot Russian Airlines DNATA 30 airbaltic 54 WestJet 26 92.31% Turkish Airlines 50 72.00% All other airlines 180 88.33% Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines. Baggage performance is measured between the following agreed core hours: 0400-2200 from May to October for both terminals, 0500-2100 between November to May for North Terminal and 0500-2200 between November to May for South Terminal. 16

AIRLINE SERVICE STANDARDS large aircraft baggage performance time for large aircraft last bag delivered within 50 minutes Time from the on-chocks time supplied by the airlines handling agents to delivery to the baggage carousel. Airlines achieving 95% or higher are considered to have met the target successfully. AIRPORT OVERALL LARGE AIRCRAFT Flights within target time in 96.87% AIRLINES 1-10 BY VOLUME OF FLIGHTS Airline & Handling Agent Number of flights Flights within target time Airline & Handling Agent Number of flights Flights within target time British Airways BA GGS 327 98.78% Norwegian NORWEGIAN 124 98.39% Monarch 324 99.07% Emirates DNATA 93 98.92% Thomas Cook 229 97.82% Vueling 83 Thomson Airways 187 88.77% WestJet 80 86.25% Virgin Atlantic VS SWP 180 98.89% Air Transat VS SWP 56 98.21% Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines. Baggage performance is measured between the following agreed core hours: 0400-2200 from May to October for both terminals, 0500-2100 between November to May for North Terminal and 0500-2200 between November to May for South Terminal. 17

AIRLINE SERVICE STANDARDS large aircraft baggage performance time for large aircraft last bag delivered within 50 minutes AIRLINES 11-21 BY VOLUME OF FLIGHTS Airline & Handling Agent Number of flights Flights within target time Airline & Handling Agent Number of flights Flights within target time WOWAir 43 Tianjin Airlines 8 75.00% Turkish Airlines 35 Air Canada VS SWP 7 Icelandair 25 92.00% RWANDAIR 2 50.00% Wizz Air 21 Aeroflot Russian Airlines DNATA 1 Cathay Pacific DNATA 18 Aer Lingus 1 Med-View Airlines 9 66.67% All other airlines 2 Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines. Baggage performance is measured between the following agreed core hours: 0400-2200 from May to October for both terminals, 0500-2100 between November to May for North Terminal and 0500-2200 between November to May for South Terminal. 18

AIRLINE SERVICE STANDARDS waiting time at check in Percentage of time when passengers queued for 30 minutes or less The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for check in or bag drop within a defined airline check in area, up to the point that the passenger reaches the check-in desk or bag drop desk/kiosk. Airlines achieving 95% or higher are considered to have met the target successfully. AIRPORT OVERALL Service Score 98.22% AIRLINES 1-11 BY VOLUME OF DEPARTING PASSENGERS Airline / Operator Departing Passengers Service Score Airline / Operator Departing Passengers Service Score easyjet 864,304 Ryanair 73,112 British Airways 298,445 95.37% Virgin Atlantic 59,040 Norwegian 142,013 99.58% Emirates 33,058 99.74% Thomson Airways 134,864 97.43% Aer Lingus 23,350 99.60% Monarch 105,101 99.67% Aurigny 14,225 99.92% Thomas Cook Airlines 89,396 92.20% All other airlines 117,246 97.89% Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines. Check-in queue performance is measured for the time in which an airline s individual check-in is open or the agreed defined time of an airline s check-in operation. 19

PRM STATISTICS Gatwick provides a range of services to passengers with reduced mobility (PRM) or who require special assistance. For information on how to access these services please go to gatwickairport.com/prm Number of flights with PRM passengers met Number of passengers needing special assistance met Percentage of pre-notifications at least 48 hours before flight* Number of compliments received (per 1000 PRM passengers) Number of complaints received (per 1000 PRM passengers) 12 Month Average 0.72 12 Month Average 0.99 18,270 64,362 48.03% 0.67 1.21 * Passengers pre-notification to their airline is required by EU regulation EC 1107/2006/. Pre-notification furthermore helps us provide a better service 20

PRM STATISTICS departing PRE-BOOKED Standard* 10 mins 20 mins 30 mins 80% 90% October November December January February March 88.30% 90.23% 89.21% 86.10% 87.46% 82.32% 95.78% 98.28% 97.49% 95.89% 96.13% 95.39% 99.61% 99.56% 99.77% 99.71% * waiting time once PRM made themselves known. 21

PRM STATISTICS arriving PRE-BOOKED Standard* 5 mins 10 mins 20 mins 80% 90% October November December January February March 95.22% 96.12% 95.21% 97.54% 97.48% 95.00% 95.82% 97.21% 97.89% 98.41% 99.27% 97.19% 97.61% 99.72% 99.11% 99.44% 98.35% NON PRE-BOOKED Standard* 25 mins 80% October November December January February March 98.73% 98.77% 98.53% 98.80% 98.37% 35 mins 90% 99.42% 99.61% 99.76% 99.82% 99.69% 99.14% 45 mins 99.80% 99.97% 99.88% * time assistance available at gate from arrival on chocks. 22

ON-TIME PERFORMANCE departures on-time performance Percentage of flights departing Gatwick within 16 minutes of the scheduled time AIRPORT OVERALL 71.90% arrivals on-time performance Percentage of flights arriving at Gatwick within 16 minutes of the scheduled time AIRPORT OVERALL 73.40% 23

ACI ASQ HOW DO WE COMPARE? Q4 2016 Airports Council International produce a measure of overall satisfaction with the airport. It shows how we compare against a panel of 22 European Competitor airports, as well as how our score (out of 5) has changed over time. Gatwick ranked 10 out of 22 in Q4 2016 How we have performed over time 4.50 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 4.00 3.50 3.00 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Gatwick s score Panel average Q3 2016 Q4 2016 24