modern-j.ru УДК

Similar documents
January 2018 Air Traffic Activity Summary

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System

Optimized Maintenance Program (OMP)

Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport

Performance monitoring report for 2014/15

Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport

Performance monitoring report 2017/18

LOUIS ARMSTRONG NEW ORLEANS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT For the Period Ending September 30, Enplaned Passengers by Airline

LOVE FIELD ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE QUARTERLY REPORT. October December 2016

Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport

ENGINEERING STATISTICS REPORT ( FOR THE MONTH OF )

Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport

IATA FUEL EFFICIENCY CAMPAIGN

Airport Noise Management System

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

TIME LIMITS AND MAINTENANCE CHECKS

Airport Noise Management System Quarterly Report. Chicago Midway International Airport

ATM Network Performance Report

Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport

ENGINEERING STATISTICS REPORT ( FOR THE PERIOD OF )

F L I G H T S A F E T Y F O U N D A T I O N. For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight

In-Service Data Program Helps Boeing Design, Build, and Support Airplanes

Managing And Understand The Impact Of Of The Air Air Traffic System: United Airline s Perspective

Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport

With the completion of this project, we would like to follow-up on the projections as well as highlight a few other items:

STRATEGY/ACTION PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMA IN THE AFRICA-INDIAN OCEAN REGION 22 NOVEMBER 2003

Performance Metrics for Oceanic Air Traffic Management. Moving Metrics Conference Pacific Grove, California January 29, 2004 Oceanic Metrics Team

LOUIS ARMSTRONG NEW ORLEANS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT For the Period Ending August 31, Enplaned Passengers by Airline

Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

U.S. DOMESTIC INDUSTRY OVERVIEW FOR MARCH

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

October 2013 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

November 2013 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Annex/FANS 17. ADS/CPDLC Report EUR/SAM Corridor: Index. Systems Direction Navigation and Surveillance Division. 2. Traffic Data Summary

Table of Contents PAGE

1-7(28)-2W Wiring Diagrams Manual 10 Sept.27/ to

Manual Status List DHC-2 to DHC-7

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

Full Year 2009 Results

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2013

2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report. Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised

Technical Report. Aircraft Overflight and Noise Analysis. Brisbane, California. December Prepared by:

Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority. Telecomm & Information Services Unit

GEN 3. SERVICES GEN AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES

N.F.F. Wasting Time and Money

Operational Risk of Aircraft System Failure

AIRSERVICES AUSTRALI A

September 2013 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

TAG Farnborough Airport

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

2007/08 Full Year Results Investor Briefing

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2013

Research on Controlled Flight Into Terrain Risk Analysis Based on Bow-tie Model and WQAR Data

Calendar 2017 Q1 Runway Safety Report

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2012

December 2013 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

LOVE FIELD ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE QUARTERLY REPORT

SERVICE LETTER REVISION

Airport Capacity, Airport Delay, and Airline Service Supply: The Case of DFW

Performance monitoring report for first half of 2015

Annual Weather Book RECORDED BY NW RESEARCH & OUTREACH CTR. By: Michael Leiseth

Update of the Airport Master Plan. Initial Runway & Land Use Alternatives

SJC North and South Flow

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

Lake Chelan Operations

STATISTICAL REPORT. Aviation

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Manual vs. Automatic Operation and Operational Restrictions

STATISTICAL REPORT. Aviation

March 2014 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

eport Airpo ational A e Interna Airport o Departm Chicago viation ment of Av source Centter on the I Visit the Internet at

STATISTICAL REPORT. Aviation

WORKSHOP 1 ICAO RPAS Panel Working Group 1 Airworthiness

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017

Passenger and Cargo Statistics Report

August 2014 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

STATISTICAL REPORT. Aviation

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION Airworthiness Notices EXTENDED DIVERSION TIME OPERATIONS (EDTO)

January 2014 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Transcription:

УДК. 629.735.33 САГДИЕВ ТУЛКУН АХМЕДЖАНОВИЧ Кандидат тех. наук, доцент кафедры «Техническая эксплуатация воздушных судов и оборудования», ТГТУ им. И. Каримова, Узбекистан, г. Ташкент, КИЯСОВ УЛУГБЕК МАХМУДКАЛИЕВИЧ Директор предприятия по обслуживанию воздушных судов UAT, Узбекистан, г. БОБОМУРОДОВ САИДБЕК КУДРАТ УГЛИ магистр кафедры «Техническая эксплуатация воздушных судов и оборудования», ТГТУ им.и. Каримова, Узбекистан, г. Ташкент, АНАЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ РАБОТА И РАЗРАБОТКА РАБОТЫ НА ОСНОВЕ ПРОГРАММЫ НАДЕЖНОСТИ В «UZBEKISTAN AIRWAYS TECHNICS» АВИАПРЕДПРИЯТИЕ ПО ОБСЛУЖИВАНИЮ ВОЗДУШНОГО СУДНА, КОТОРАЯ ЧАСТЬ НАК «ЎЗБЕКИСТОН ҲАВО ЙЎЛЛАРИ» Аннотация: В статье проводится анализ проводимых работ в авиапредприятия Uzbekiston airways technics входящий в состав НАК «Ўзбекистон ҳаво йўллари» в рамках программы надежности и его оптимизации, а также даются сведения по исследованию и результатам по разработки автоматизированной системы программы надежности на предприятии. Ключевые слова: техобслуживание, неисправность, Уровень верхнего контроля, Пилотные отчеты, Отчеты по обслуживанию. SAGDIEV TULKUN AKHMEDJANOVICH Tashkent State Technical University named I. Karimov, Associate Professor, Department of Technical maintenance of aircraft and equipment, Tashkent KIYASOV ULUGBEK MAHMUDKALIYEVICH Director of UAT aircraft maintenance enterprise, Tashkent BOBOMURODOV SAIDBEK KUDRAT UGLI Master student of Tashkent State Technical University named I.A.Karimov, Tashkent ANALYTICAL WORK AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE WORK CARRY OUT ON YHE BASIS OF RELIABILITY PROGRAMM IN UZBEKISTAN AIRWAYS TECHNICS AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE ENTERPRISE WHICH IS PART OF THE NAC UZBEKISTAN AIRWAYS Annotation: The article indicates that analyzing the work carried out in the aviation enterprise "Uzbekistan airways technics" which is a part of NAC "Uzbekistan Airways" within the framework of the reliability program and its optimization, as well as provides information on _

research and results on the development of an automated system of reliability programs at the enterprise. Keywords: maintenance, malfunction, Upper Control Level, Pilot reports, Maintenance Reports. The reliability program of aircraft in maintenance and operation is an accumulation of data analyzing and recording of the phase belonging to the aircraft airworthiness. The results obtained by observance reliability in operation could functions a basis for supplementing or modifying the maintenance programme of the aircraft; such changes would illustrate the malfunction of elements or systems manifesting lacks and also the want for early management, or replacement throughout utilization. The main purpose of the organization of reliability programs at the Uzbekistan Airways Technics (UAT) aircraft maintenance enterprise in the structure of the National Air Company "Uzbekistan Airways" is the operation of all types of aircraft of the existing fleet of aircraft, as well as any faults All statistical information gathered and collected will be summarized and analyzed. Based on the analysis of data collected, a dedicated targeted service program will be developed, based on which the airplane expiration date (which is valid for a certain period of time) will be extended and the maintenance period for the aircraft maintenance system will be determined for a specified period of time. This will spontaneously cost a significant reduction in cost and, at the same time, increase the reliability of flight. The parameters monitored for aircraft reliability in operation are the subsequent: the number of airplane flight hours; the number of airplanes flight cycles; the number of flight delays due to the technical reason; the number of technical flights canceled within the specified timeframe; and the following basic information parameters: pilot reports _

technical staff reports unscheduled component removals component removals The UAT airline's reliability program schedule in operation is as follows: - First, according to the Air Transport Association system, the amount of malfunction per month and delays to each system are accumulated as well as calculated as the coefficient of "Operation failure", based on the equation and included in the special table (Table 1) throughout the year: X = k t 100% k is the total number of aircraft of cancellation t is the number of hours in the period observed, e.g. one month Table 1 Coefficients of "malfunction in operation" on the basis of number of flight delays for each month of each component ATA chapter SYSTEM Feb. Mar. Apr. May. Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. 21 Air conditioning 0,24 0 0,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Auto flight 0 0 0 0 0,11 0 0 0 0 0 23 Communication 0,24 0,11 0,1 0,1 0,22 0,57 0,45 0,21 0,21 0,21 24 Electrical power 0,24 0 0,1 0 0 0 0,11 0 0 0 25 Equipment&Furnishing 1,32 0,22 0,7 0,1 1, 0 0 0,63 0,1 0,52 - One of the most important aspects of this system is the number of malfunction, delay and cancellation of these aircraft systems in each quarter of the year and its quarterly value is calculated using the following equation (Table 2): Y n = x n 3 + x n 2 + x n 1 3 x n 1 ; x n 2 ; x n 3 ) is the number of malfunction, delay and cancellation within three months before the n-month. _

Table 2 Coefficients of the number of malfunction of aircraft systems for each quarter of the year ATA Chapter SYSTEM Feb. Mar. Apr. May. Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. 21 Air conditioning 0 0 0,11 0,03 0,03 0 0 0 0 0 22 Auto flight 0,03 0 0 0 0,03 0,03 0,03 0 0 0 23 Communication 0 0 0,15 0,10 0, 0,29 0,41 0,41 0,29 0,21 24 Electrical power 0 0,01 0,11 0,03 0,03 0 0,03 0,03 0,03 0 25 Equipment&Furnishing 0 0,04 0,74 0,34 0,64 0,41 0,38 0,21 0,24 0,41 - Defects and faults in aircraft systems and components, as well as the number of flights per month, and quarterly, are recommended for maintenance of the aircraft or certain systems when it reaches the Upper Control Level line (Figure 1). ATA 23 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 0 Feb. Mar. Apr. May. Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan.15 Month Rate UCL Last 3 month Rate Figure 1.Graphs of monthly and quarterly coefficients of the number of delayed flights on the basis of malfunction and disruptions in aircraft construction and systems. These charts are produced for each aircraft systems based on ATA chapter. One of the key issues in creating them is to determine the coefficient that affects the flight safety of each system to determine the UCL line in the graph. It is desirable to consider the solution of these issues in any aircraft system, such as the hydraulic system. The aircraft's hydraulic system consists of three main components: left, right and center systems. Each system under analysis consists of the components or _

elements that are required by its function. These components are interconnected, and any of them may be malfunction or failure of the subsequent constructor, so that the optimal compilation of the sequence of components of each system component, and the failure or damage of each component, to determine the extent to which it will affect its safety. As a result of detected faults and deterioration, the average coefficient of impact on the flight safety of damage or damage to each element of the hydroelectric of the aircraft is determined and included in table (3-schedule). 3-schedule Flight safety influence rate of each hydro system components of aircraft because of malfunction and failure Left system elements. K * Center system elements. K * Right system elements. K * Engine driven pump Engine driven pump 0.5 Electric motor pump 1 0.55 System "L" System"R" 0.5 Engine Reduction 0.85 Electric motor pump 2 0.65 Engine Reduction 0.85 Electric motor pump 0.35 Air Driven Pump 0.15 Electric motor pump 0.3 Reservoir "L" 0.2 Engine Reduction 0.85 Reservoir "R" 0.2 Reservoir Pressurization 0.18 Reservoir "C" 0.3 Reservoir Pressurization 0.45 Heat Exchanger 0.3 Reservoir Pressurization 0.27 Heat Exchanger 0.25 Explanation: K* is the average rate of influence on flight safety due to failure or damage of the system component. As the main information and resources collected for the Reliability Program: - Reports of airplane system crash (malfunctions, failure) of flight attendants; - Reports of airplane systems reported by technicians during the preparation of the aircraft on landing. Pilot reports, (PIREPS) are reports of occurrences and malfunctions entered in the Aircraft Technical Log Book by the flight crew. PIREPS are among the most significant sources of information, since they are a direct indication of aircraft reliability as experienced by the crew. _

Maintenance Reports {MAREPS} are entered in the Ground Log Books I Ground Finding Sheets by the maintenance. In summary, it should be noted that the work on the reliability program is primarily based on the use of the Excel software system. However, there are many mistakes and mistakes in using this system. This loss of shortcomings, and reliability program "UAT" airline in order to ensure the full use of our side, "the aviation equipment reliability program to develop an automated system" in the direction of scientific research is conducted. This system developed in the airline will be implemented in the future to improve the economic efficiency of the enterprise (where aircraft maintenance and repair process by reducing debugging time and detect violations of the elements of the system), to ensure the safety of passengers and flight of the aircraft. List of used literatures: 1. Bazijanac, E.: Aircrafts Operation and Maintenance, Theoretical Fundamentals, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, Zagreb, 2007. 2. Marušić, Ž.; Alfirević, I.; Pita, O.: Maintenance Reliability Program as Essential Prerequisite of Flight Safety, Traffic and Transportation, vol. XXI, No 4, 2009, pp. 269 277 _