Service Change Plan Cowichan Valley Regional Transit System July 2018 Expansion. Prepared by

Similar documents
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

Cowichan Valley Regional Transit

(This page intentionally left blank.)

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

PLEASE READ Proposal for Sustainable Service

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

Juneau Comprehensive Operations Analysis and Transit Development Plan DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS January 2014

Approval of August 2019 Service Changes

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

General Issues Committee Item Transit Operating Budget Ten Year Local Transit Strategy

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

Kitsap Transit Board Workshop January 16, 2018

Chapel Hill Transit: Short Range Transit Plan. Preferred Alternative DRAFT

Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation Authority

Trans Canada Highway Corridor Management Plan. Final Draft Report. Drinkwater Road to Cowichan Bay Road. Prepared for:

Call for Public Hearing August 2019 Service Changes

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

Development of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level and BRT Route Pattern Alternatives

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

Call for Public Hearing August 2019 Service Changes

CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan

City of Duncan Regular Council Minutes

Metrobus Service Evaluations

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN

Resort Municipality Initiative Annual Report 2015

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Terrace Regional Transit System CITY OF TERRACE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SEPTEMBER 13, 2017

METRO Orange Line Update Metro Transit, BRT/Small Starts Projects Christina Morrison & Natalie Westberg Transportation Committee July 10, 2017

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012

COLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN

2018 Service Changes Ada County

Western Placer County Transit Operators Short Range Transit Plan Updates FY to FY Project Update and Alternatives Discussion

Update of the 2016 TDP and Community Involvement. HART Board Meeting September 14, 2015

FUTURE AIRSPACE CHANGE

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

// Atlanta Streetcar System Plan

NSW GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE VISITOR ECONOMY TASKFORCE REPORT

Annual Route Report Operating Data. Prepared for: Board of Directors. Final 4/26/2018

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon

City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number Mayor and Members of Council Jim Keech, President & CEO, Utilities Kingston

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Community Meetings March 12, 13, 17 & 19, 2018

BRIEFING Subject: 2017 Visitation Initiatives

JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results

COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT (Lisa Belsanti, Director) (Joshua Schare, Public Information Officer)

East Farmingdale Fire Department 930 Conklin Street. Source: Parsons Brinckerhoff

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

(Also known as the Den-Ice Agreements Program) Evaluation & Advisory Services. Transport Canada

METROPOLITAN EVANSVILLE TRANSIT SYSTEM Part I: Comprehensive Operations Analysis Overview July 9 th, 2015 Public Information Meeting

Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Kitchener to Cambridge

With the first portion of this process complete, we anticipate the general timeline for the remainder of the process to be:

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

ROUTE 103. Morrisville Shopping Shuttle ROUTE OVERVIEW

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

WESTERN EL DORADO COUNTY SHORT AND LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Executive Summary

Chapter 5 Alternatives

CAA MINDED TO REJECT EDINBURGH AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL

EX28.6 REPORT FOR ACTION. Advancing Fare Integration SUMMARY. Date: October 16, 2017 To: Executive Committee From: City Manager Wards: All

Service Recommendation Plan. June 2018

Draft SamTrans Service Plan Public Outreach Presentation

Committee. Presentation Outline

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS PUBLIC MEETING DECEMBER 6, 2017

Jubilee Local Area Transit Plan

Request for Proposals

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY

Rail /Trail Service Plan & Infrastructure Upgrade Project 14 April 2018

Request to Improve Transit along the Dufferin Street Corridor

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type: Informational Report Agenda Number: 25

1. Introduction. 2. Overview of Existing Conditions

Study Overview and Context

Air Operator Certification

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Report by Finance Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

14 YORK REGION TRANSIT (YRT/VIVA) SOUTHWEST DIVISION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT EXTENSION

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

September 2010 Service Reduction

Intercity Transit Short / Long Range Plan Short-Term Recommendations Transit Authority Meeting

I-95/395 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes Project Overview

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

Marin County Transit District 2006 Draft Service Plan Revised: May 8 th, 2006

Project Deliverable 4.1.3d Individual City Report - City of La Verne

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

Project Advisory Group. May 23, 2013

Government consultations : Airports National Policy Statement, UK Airspace Policy, Night Flights

LODI CITY COUNCIL Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

EXHIBIT 1. BOARD AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A JOINT DEVELOPMENT SOLICITATION

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM

New free City connector bus service

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

METRONext PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PHASE I

Improving Transit Service to Major Music Festivals

Memorandum. DATE: May 9, Board of Directors. Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director. Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program

Transit in Toronto. Chair Adam Giambrone Sunday, October

PROPOSED FOR IMPLEMENTATION

NCAP Application Section E: Continuous Camp Improvement Plan

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

Transcription:

Service Change Plan Cowichan Valley Regional Transit System July 18 Expansion Prepared by

OVERVIEW In order to continue delivering on the Cowichan Valley Transit Future Plan goals and objectives and to support the success of the transit system, the Cowichan Valley Regional District approved a transit service expansion of 1,00 hours for implementation in July 18. This report outlines the planning rationale for the service changes, detailed routes and infrastructure requirements and timeline required for a successful implementation. The service changes were developed based on action items in the Cowichan Valley Transit Future Plan (12), review of adopted service standards alongside route performance data, and ongoing feedback from the transit operators, the public and community stakeholders. The community engagement process for this service change was a collaborative effort by BC Transit, the Cowichan Valley Regional District, and the local operating company, First Canada. Five public input sessions were held and print and online surveys were distributed to collect input on proposed changes. Based on evaluation of the customer benefits and trade-offs, ridership analysis, public feedback, and local government approval, the 1,00-hour service expansion discussed in this report will be implemented on July 2, 18.

CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction... 3 2.0 Planning Rationale... 4 2.1 Route 3 Analysis... 4 2.2 Route 4 Analysis... 2.3 Route Analysis... 6 3.0 Public Engagement... 7 4.0 Engagement Results... 8 4.1 Age... 8 4.2 Route 3... 9 4.3 Route 4... 11 4.4 Route... 13 4.6 Route 6 (Crofton-Chemainus)... 1 4.7 Route 7 (Cowichan Lake via Gibbins)... 16.0 Public Engagement Key Themes... 16 6.0 Marketing and Communication Plan... 17 7.0 Monitoring Plan... 17

1.0 Introduction In order to continue delivering on the goals and objectives of the Cowichan Valley Transit Future Plan and to support alignment with adopted service standards and performance guidelines, the Cowichan Valley Regional District (CVRD) approved a transit service expansion of 1,00 conventional service hours, effective July 2, 18. This report outlines the routes, schedules and infrastructure required for successful implementation of the service changes. It provides: 1. An overview of the implementation timeline; 2. A summary of the planning rationale with data analysis and public engagement results; 3. An overview of route changes and trips being added on well performing routes; and 4. An overview of the marketing and communication plans to advise customers about the transit improvements. Table 1: Cowichan Valley Regional Transit System Implementation Timeline Date* September 17 September 17 Deliverable MOU for 18 Expansion signed Proposed service change options developed for public engagement October / November 17 Public Engagement Period December 17 January February 18 February 18 March May 18 May / June 18 June 18 June 18 July 2, 18 Review of engagement results to confirm service changes for scheduling Scheduling review to confirm implementation recommendations CVRD Approval of Implementation Recommendations* Updates to Riders Guide* Rider Alert circulated to preview service and fare changes coming Bus stop and street schedule updates Riders Guide released, website updated and marketing/media Service Implementation *A fare review was also initiated in September 17 to provide options for changes in cash, ticket, and pass prices to coincide with service changes being implemented in July 18. New fares are effective July 2. Please see Service Change Summary 18 for this information.

Trunk at Ypres Duncan Train Station Ingram at Craig Government St at Allenby at River Allenby at Club Miller Rd, 430 block Miller at Laurel Cove Miller at Eagle Heights Eagle Heights at Glenora at Miller Miller at Koksilah Koksilah Rd, 0 block Koksilah at Allenby Polkey at Boal Polkey at Mearns Mearns at Roberts Polkey at Allenby Allenby Rd, 3000 block Boys at Silver Park Boys at Stotlou Mission at Smith Christopher at Eleanor Francis at Chaster Christopher at Francis Chaster Rd, 270 block Chaster, at Thiek Trans-Canada Hwy at 2.0 Planning Rationale Based on route performance data and ridership count data collected in March 17, transit service priorities were developed to improve the transit network. Changes include an expansion of 1,00 annualized service hours. Changes include restructuring Routes 3 Quamichan, Route 4 Maple Bay, and Route Eagle Heights to improve travel times for customers and provide more direct service into the downtown core. Key Service Changes for July 2, 18 Route 3: Restructuring to provide more direct service between Cowichan Commons and the Downtown area. Route 4: Restructuring to provide more direct service between the Marchmont/McKinistry area and Duncan in both directions. Route : Restructuring to offer improved travel times Route 2: Two new trips from Cowichan Commons to Route 6: New 8:30 am morning trip (departs ) Route 7: New 7:30 am evening trip (departs ) 2.1 Route 3 Analysis Change Overview: The changes to this route will offer more direct service between Cowichan Commons and downtown Duncan in both directions. Service to the Lakes and Jaynes neighbourhood area has been removed based on low ridership, as shown in the graphs below. Transit service from these areas, however, is still possible via Route 4 on Tzouhalem Road and Route 6 on Lakes Road. Service has been added to Howard Avenue in both directions. 2 1 10 0 21 6 2 1 4 4 4 1 2 3 6 7 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 Sum of On Sum of Off 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 2 26 27 28 29 30

Trunk at Ypres Duncan Train Ingram at Craig Government St at Allenby at River Allenby at Club Miller Rd, 430 Miller at Laurel Cove Miller at Eagle Eagle Heights at Glenora at Miller Miller at Koksilah Koksilah Rd, 0 Koksilah at Allenby Polkey at Boal Polkey at Mearns Mearns at Roberts Polkey at Allenby Allenby Rd, 3000 Boys at Silver Park Boys at Stotlou Mission at Smith Christopher at Francis at Chaster Christopher at Chaster Rd, 270 Chaster, at Thiek Trans-Canada Hwy Trunk at Ypres Duncan Train Station Ingram at Craig Government St at Allenby at River Allenby at Club Miller Rd, 430 block Miller at Laurel Cove Miller at Eagle Heights Eagle Heights at Glenora at Miller Miller at Koksilah Koksilah Rd, 0 Koksilah at Allenby Polkey at Boal Polkey at Mearns Mearns at Roberts Polkey at Allenby Allenby Rd, 3000 block Boys at Silver Park Boys at Stotlou Mission at Smith Christopher at Eleanor Francis at Chaster Christopher at Francis Chaster Rd, 270 block Chaster, at Thiek Trans-Canada Hwy 2 1 10 0 21 2 6 1 4 4 4 1 2 1 1 3 6 7 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 Sum of On Sum of Off 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 2 26 27 28 29 30 2.2 Route 4 Analysis Change Overview: The changes to this route will provide direct service to the Marchmont/McKinstry neighbourhood in both directions (i.e. on all Route 4 trips). Service has been removed from the Osprey, Pacific, Nevilane and Mckenzie loop as well as the Everest, Donnay and Stonehouse loop due to low ridership. Analysis, as shown below indicates that these sections generate low ridership. 2 1 10 0 21 2 6 1 4 4 4 1 2 1 1 3 6 7 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 Sum of On Sum of Off 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 2 26 27 28 29 30

Trunk at Ypres Duncan Train Station Ingram at Craig Government St at Allenby at River Allenby at Club Miller Rd, 430 block Miller at Laurel Cove Miller at Eagle Eagle Heights at Glenora at Miller Miller at Koksilah Koksilah Rd, 0 Koksilah at Allenby Polkey at Boal Polkey at Mearns Mearns at Roberts Polkey at Allenby Allenby Rd, 3000 Boys at Silver Park Boys at Stotlou Mission at Smith Christopher at Francis at Chaster Christopher at Chaster Rd, 270 Chaster, at Thiek Trans-Canada Hwy Trunk at Ypres Duncan Train Station Ingram at Craig Government St at Allenby at River Allenby at Club Miller Rd, 430 block Miller at Laurel Cove Miller at Eagle Heights Eagle Heights at Glenora at Miller Miller at Koksilah Koksilah Rd, 0 Koksilah at Allenby Polkey at Boal Polkey at Mearns Mearns at Roberts Polkey at Allenby Allenby Rd, 3000 block Boys at Silver Park Boys at Stotlou Mission at Smith Christopher at Eleanor Francis at Chaster Christopher at Francis Chaster Rd, 270 block Chaster, at Thiek Trans-Canada Hwy at 2 1 10 0 21 6 2 1 4 4 4 1 2 3 6 7 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 Sum of On Sum of Off 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 2 26 27 28 29 30 2.3 Route Analysis Change Overview: The changes to this route will provide more direct service by removing segments on Allenby and Boys Road to the west of Highway 1 that were not well used. Analysis, as shown below indicates that these sections generate low ridership. Buses will also travel in the opposite direction along Chaster, Mission and Boys Road east of Highway 1 for more direct connections to Duncan. 2 1 10 0 21 2 6 1 4 4 4 1 2 1 1 3 6 7 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 Sum of On Sum of Off 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 2 26 27 28 29 30

3.0 Public Engagement As part of the service change process, BC Transit and the Cowichan Valley Regional District hosted five public engagement sessions, engaging with 68 people at these events.

4.0 Engagement Results The following results represent online survey, paper survey, and open house session information. 4.1 Age Age Distribution 4.00% 40.00% 3.00% 30.00% 2.00%.00% 1.00% 10.00%.00% 0.00% 40.82% 37.14% 1.1% 6.3% 19-24 2-4 + Prefer not to say Total Regular Bus Route Usage 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 14% 12% 12% 4% 1% 13% 10% 2% 2% 16% Respondents using Other Routes were primarily using Routes 8 and 9 (South Cowichan area), and to a smaller degree, Ladysmith and Cowichan Valley Commuter routes.

4.2 Route 3

How would the proposed 3 Quamichan work for you? 30.00% 28.4% 2.00%.00% 1.00% 21.%.69% 1.2% 10.00%.00% 7.76% Total 6.03% 0.00% About the same Better Don't know Much better Much Worse Worse Support Changes to Route 3 17% 8% 74% Yes, with modifications Yes No (please explain) Total Respondents = 247 Applicable Respondents: 117 Respondents who selected this change doesn t affect me, or don t know are not included in the subsequent Support Change pie chart statistics. Given that this survey asked about changes to multiple different routes, it is not uncommon for respondents to select don t know when a change is on a route that do not use, or without having full schedule details. The Support Change statistics are specific to respondents indicating that they are impacted by the proposed change. For Route 3, 74% supported the proposed routing updates.

4.3 Route 4

How would the proposed 4 Maple Bay work for you? 40.00% 37.84% 3.00% 30.00% 2.00% 21.62% 22.97%.00% 17.7% 1.00% 10.00% Total.00% 0.00% A new :30 p.m. trip (arrives in Lake Cowichan by 6: p.m. and in Duncan by 7:1 p.m.) A new 6:00 p.m. trip (arrives in Lake Cowichan by 6:0 p.m. and in Duncan by 7:4 p.m.) A new 6:30 p.m. trip (arrives in Lake Cowichan by 7: p.m. and in Duncan by 8:1 p.m.) Other (please specify) Support Changes to Route 4 24% 14% 62% Yes, with modifications Yes No (please explain) Total Respondents = 9 Applicable Respondents: 103 Respondents who selected this change doesn t affect me, or don t know are not included in the subsequent Support Change pie chart statistics. Given that this survey asked about changes to multiple different routes, it is not uncommon for respondents to select don t know when a change is on a route that do not use, or without having full schedule details. The Support Change statistics are

specific to respondents indicating that they are impacted by the proposed change. For Route 4, 62% supported the proposed routing updates. 4.4 Route

How would the proposed Eagle Heights work for you? 4.00% 40.00% 39.74% 3.00% 30.00% 2.00% 23.08%.00% 1.00% 17.9% 1.38% Total 10.00%.00% 1.28% 2.6% 0.00% About the same Better Don't know Much better Much worse Worse Support Changes to Route 11% 9% 80% Yes, with modifications Yes No (please explain) Total Respondents = 210 Applicable Respondents: 78 Respondents who selected this change doesn t affect me, or don t know are not included in the subsequent Support Change pie chart statistics. Given that this survey asked about changes to multiple different routes, it is not uncommon for respondents to select don t know when a change is on

a route that do not use, or without having full schedule details. The Support Change statistics are specific to respondents indicating that they are impacted by the proposed change. For Route, 80% supported the proposed routing updates. 4.6 Route 6 (Crofton-Chemainus) 30.00% 27.91% 2.00% 2.8% 2.8%.93%.00% 1.00% Total 10.00%.00% 0.00% A new 6:30 a.m. trip (trips arrives in Chemainus by 7: a.m. and in Duncan by 8:1 a.m.) A new 7:30 a.m. trip (arrives in Chemainus by 8: a.m. and in Duncan by 9:1 a.m.) A new 8:30 a.m. trip (arrives in Chemainus by 9: a.m. and in Duncan by 10:1 a.m.) Other (please specify) Total Respondents = 199 Applicable Respondents: 86 Participants who selected Not applicable are not included in the statistics above. Public support for a new 8:30 a.m. trip leaving Duncan and arriving into Chemainus around 9: a.m. and back to Duncan by 10:1 a.m. received the highest levels of support. Public expressed a desire for more evening trips and earlier morning trips (before 7 am)

4.7 Route 7 (Cowichan Lake via Gibbins) 40.00% 37.84% 3.00% 30.00% 2.00% 21.62% 22.97%.00% 17.7% Total 1.00% 10.00%.00% 0.00% A new :30 p.m. trip (arrives in Lake Cowichan by 6: p.m. and in Duncan by 7:1 p.m.) A new 6:00 p.m. trip (arrives in Lake Cowichan by 6:0 p.m. and in Duncan by 7:4 p.m.) A new 6:30 p.m. trip (arrives in Lake Cowichan by 7: p.m. and in Duncan by 8:1 p.m.) Other (please specify) Total Respondents = 199 Applicable Respondents: 74 Participants who selected Not applicable were not included in the statistics above. Public support for a trip around 6:30 p.m. leaving Duncan and arriving into Cowichan Lake around 7: a.m. and back to Duncan by 8:1 p.m. received the highest levels of support..0 Public Engagement Key Themes Participants support changes to Routes 3, 4, and. Participants indicated they would prefer an 8:30 a.m. weekday trip on Route 6 and a 6:30 p.m. weekday trip on Route 7.

Results from the online survey and public engagement events suggest demand for evening weekday service and additional weekend service on all routes, particularly on Route 3, 6, 8, and 9. Participants expressed a desire for increased service frequency and longer service hours on all routes With this input BC Transit and CVRD staff reviewed options for scheduling of service changes based on available fleet and scheduling connections with the intent to minimize disruption to existing trips. It must be noted, that changes are being implemented using the existing fleet (i.e. no new buses) so options are constrained by fleet availability and with a heavily interlined system care must be taken to avoid major changes to existing scheduled connections between routes. The following section discusses service change improvements prioritized for implementation in July 18. 6.0 Marketing and Communication Plan A marketing and communication plan has been developed that outlines the steps necessary to communicate this service expansion to the public. The objectives of this plan are outlined below: To make the public aware of the new transit service and other transit services in the region To ease implementation To promote ridership and community support for transit The plan will include several strategies to achieve the above, including a media release, radio, paper and social media adverts, website promotion, and a Rider s Alert rack card with new route, schedule, and fare information. These media releases will be disseminated six weeks prior to implementation on July 2, 18. 7.0 Monitoring Plan The new transit service will be monitored closely by BC Transit and the Cowichan Valley Regional District following implementation to ensure that the schedules and route alignments are meeting the needs of customers. This will include ridership analysis, on-time performance analysis and customer feedback.