ANALYSIS OF IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA

Similar documents
The Development of International Trade: The Future Aim of Macedonia

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN NOVEMBER 2018

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN FEBRUARY 2018

ANALYSIS OF FOREIGN TRADE INDICATORS OF THE WESTERN BALKANS. Tamara Sarić *

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS IN ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN FEBRUARY 2011

Tourist Traffic in the City of Rijeka For the Period Between 2004 and 2014

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN OCTOBER 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN NOVEMBER 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN JANUARY 2018

The Implications of Balkan Accession for the economy of Greece

FOREIGN TRADE OF KOSOVO AND IMPACT OF FISCAL POLICY

An overview of Tallinn tourism trends

Tourism in Prague 2013 Overall assessment after data revision

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY* July December 2015

% change vs. Dec ALL VISITS (000) 2,410 12% 7,550 5% 31,148 1% Spend ( million) 1,490 15% 4,370-1% 18,710 4%

EU-Russia summit Strong recovery of trade in goods between EU27 and Russia in 2011 An EU27 deficit of 91 bn euro with Russia in 2011

Cumulative Investments by Sector. Cumulative Investment by Country. Industry, Commerce & Agribusiness 18% Transport 30% Natural Resources 2%

The exhibition is carried out through international exhibitions and commodity groups, which saves time of exhibitors.

The economic impact of ATC strikes in Europe Key findings from our updated report for A4E

Growth Potential of the Balkans

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY. July December 2017

CCBE LAWYERS STATISTICS 2016

New wiiw forecast for Central, East and Southeast Europe,

THE INFLUENCE OF TRANSIT TOURISTS TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT OF HOSPITALITY IN THE SOUTHEASTERN REGION

Journal of Tourism Challenges and Trends. Volume VIII, No.1 June 2015 CRUISE TOURISM

Contribution from UNCTAD dated: 4 June 2012

Inbound Tourism Prague, 2014 Overall Assessment

IMD World Talent Report Factor 1 : Investment and Development

GODINA XI SARAJEVO, BROJ 2 TOURISM STATISTICS. Tourism in BIH, February 2017

Modelling International Tourism Demand and Uncertainty in the Maldives and Seychelles: A Portfolio Approach

Energy Community Regulatory Board Status review of transmission tariffs and treatment of cross - border transmission flows and recommendations By

De luchtvaart in het EU-emissiehandelssysteem. Summary

1.0 Introduction Zambia s Major Trading Partners Zambia s Major Export Markets... 4

Environment Agency Austria in Twinning Projects

STATISTIČKI INFORMATOR BROJ 2. STATISTICAL BULLETIN

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Economics and Finance 6 ( 2013 )

SIMULATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AIRSPACE

Benchmarking Travel & Tourism in United Arab Emirates

Vera Zelenović. University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia. Dragan Lukač. Regional Chamber of Commerce Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

SLOVAKIA. Table 1. FDI flows in the host economy, by geographical origin. (Millions of US dollars)

THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA - YOUR TRADE PARTNER

What I want to know about the Balkans.

FORMING OF MUTUAL RELATION OF ECONOMIC STABILIZATION PARAMETER IN TRANSFORMATION COUNTRIES IN YEARS

Introduction 3. Accommodation 4. Ireland Market 5. Activity Providers, Attractions, Retail and Transport 6. Overseas Market Performance 7.

NLB d.d., Ljubljana PRESENTATION

Current Issues in Tourism Policy Making in Hungary

Common Market Organisation (CMO) Fruit and vegetables sector Evolution of EU prices of some F&V products

page 1 Carlo Ardizzone is reports reflects only the opinions of the writer, does not committ OMG. Cerutti

European Journal of Economic Studies, 2016, Vol.(17), Is. 3

ELEVENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE. Montreal, 22 September to 3 October 2003

AN OVERVIEW ON THE MAIN COORDINATES OF TOURISM ACTIVITY IN ROMANIA

The Nordic Countries in an International Comparison. Helga Kristjánsdóttir 20. apríl 2012

Structured UNiversity mobility between the Balkans and Europe for the Adriatic-ionian Macroregion

Visit Finland Visitor Survey 2017

Sweden. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

MARKET NEWSLETTER No 57 January 2012

1.0 Introduction Zambia s Major Trading Partners Zambia s Major Export Markets... 4

Project Innovation Policy Learning from Norway in Western Balkans

TENDENCIES, PERSPECTIVES AND INVESTMENT POSSIBILITIES IN THE HUNGARIAN TOURISM

Over 2017, FPC s domestic passenger traffic grew by 1.4%. MACROECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT. Indicators 2017

Austria. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Weekly report from grain, animal feed, oil seeds and oils markets in Serbia and world

IATA ECONOMIC BRIEFING MARCH 2011

March 2015 compared with February 2015 Volume of retail trade down by 0.8% in euro area Down by 0.6% in EU28

Global Travel Trends 2005

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY. January June 2018

Tourist arrivals and overnight stays in collective accommodation 1 July 2017 (p)

Outlook for air travel markets

Benchmarking Travel & Tourism in Colombia

THE DISINTEGRATION OF SETTLEMENTS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA THE EXAMPLE OF SARAJEVO/EAST SARAJEVO

ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT IN

FLANDERS INVESTMENT & TRADE MARKET SURVEY

TAIEX. Institution Building support for Agriculture and Rural Development by Twinning and TAIEX. Institution Building Unit DG Enlargement

talent Tourism for entertaining in Hungary HUNGARY Talent for entertaining

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Slovenia

Anatoliy Mazaraki Tetyana Tkachenko

EU MACRO-REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE CARPATHIAN REGION. Gabriela Szuba Ministry of the Environment, Poland Modra, June 2017

Project of E-763 Motorway Construction, Section: Belgrade Ostružnica - Požega Boljare/ Border of Montenegro

Asia-Pacific Trade Briefs: New Zealand

1.4: Premium Air Travel: An Important Market Segment

Aarhus Universitet - Handels- og IngeniørHøjskolen i Herning. Engineering Edition. Partner Report

Latest Tourism Trends. Humphrey Walwyn Head of VisitEngland Research

EUROCONTROL Low-Cost Carrier Market Update

State of the Aviation Industry

October 2013 compared with September 2013 Industrial production down by 1.1% in euro area Down by 0.7% in EU28

EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF THE ECONOMIC CRISIS ON GREEK TOURISM: PUBLIC

Company ID. Bosnia and Herzegovina Entity: The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Canton: The Herzegovina-Neretva Canton

III. TRADE IN COMMERCIAL SERVICES BY CATEGORY

The demand trend of Italian agritourism

Understanding Business Visits

Kosovo s economic and investment potential

1.0 Introduction Zambia s Major Trading Partners Zambia s Major Export Markets... 4

Internal and external barriers to export success in Kosovo : [presentation given February 25, 2010]

Global Travel Trends 2006

assists in the development of airport capacity to meet growing demand supports the development of improved ground access to airports

IV International Symposium Agrosym /AGSY M INSTRUMENTS OF ECONOMIC MEASURES OF AGRICULTURAL POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA

Professional tourism analysis of the hotel market in Timisoara, Romania

Government Keynote Address. Delian Dobrev, Minister of Economy, Energy and Tourism

Survey on arrivals and overnight stays of tourists, total 2017

Partner Report Aarhus Universitet - Handels- og IngeniørHøjskolen i Herning

Transcription:

ANALYSIS OF IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA Jelena MILINKOVIĆ, Tanja SERDAR, Dragan ILIĆ High School of Applied and Legal Sciences, Prometej, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska Bosnia and Herzegovina, e-mail: studentskasluzba@prometejbl.edu.ba Abstract The trend to gradually erase geographic boundaries demonstrates that participation in the economy foresees and the use of the word globally and many companies get a prefix multinational. Business operation includes collaboration with a number of different countries, with people of different ethnic, cultural and religious background. All the above can be an advantage, but also a huge obstacle that may be reflected in business diversity and depends on the different markets and significantly will affect to overall business operation of the state and the company. The last two decades of the twentieth century have brought revolutionary changes in the field of international business. There has been deleted traditional and required new demands before the actors on the international business scene. The Republic of Srpska has a chance that through respect of international trends floats in successful water of the world economy, and in no way neglect integration towards the modern trends and requirements. E Keywords import, export, foreign trade exchange. I. INTRODUCTION CONOMICS faculty in Banja Luka is an institution that has been entrusted development strategy of exports promotion of the Republic of Srpska, including the period 2009-2012 years. There has been made a statement of basic characteristics of the foreign trade business, primarily referring to: an open economic system, high import-export dependance, a low level of coverage of imports by exports, the current account deficit of the balance of payments, low competitiveness of domestic production and real growth of imports. The promotion strategy had an objective to encourge imports and promotion of import substitution. Diversification of markets and the development of certain sectors should be the result of a significant improvement in the foreign trade balance. It emphasizes the presence in the international market as an unavoidable part of doing business in the country through the preparation and implementation of measures in order to encourage the strengthening of the entrepreneurs competitiveness on the international scene. Overall world exports increased by about twenty times in the last century, and exports of industrial products about forty times. Quarter of the world GDP is currently made by global trade exchanges. Most of the revenue from international trade have highly developed countries where production and services are competitive in the world market. At this moment we can notice some global trends: - the highest rate of development have countries with the highest export; - increase of similarities of the production capacities in the world aimed to reduce the role of transport and communication as a factor of competitiveness; - development of technology becomes a key factor and response to the earlier mass production based on cheap labour, raw materials and energy; - industrial branches based on knowledge and skill, respectively the human factor becomes a key factor of competitiveness. The Republic of Srpska, as well as all other areas are fighting for their position in the international arena, where at this moment is weaker in relation to transitional and developed countries. The foreign trade deficit is one of the biggest problem of the economy, which is reflected in a weak competitiveness in the international market, poor protection and stimulation of domestic production, insufficient supervision, high rates of import and export dependence, inconsistent customs tariffs of B and H [11-14]. II. FOREIGN TRADE EXCHANGE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA In the world market, the Republic of Srpska records permanent growth which at the end of 2011 amounted to 2.338.511,75, which represents an increase by 7,2 % compared to the previous year. The import is relating to the sum of 2.338.511,75, and 1.306.903,69 to exchange in exports, where is noticable a negative balance of 1.031.608,06. Foreign trade exchange will still continue to go on the upward path, as a greater degree of openness of the economy due to increased activities of companies. Demand for equipment and semi-products, supply of domestic manufacturers who show good results, is the favourable guarantee for the economic future. For the first seven months of this year, the Republic of Srpska has exported goods worth of 715 millions, and has imported as much as 1,3 billion euros, according to 154

the data of the Statistical Office of the Republic of Srpska. Compared to the same period last period, the value of exports is decreased by 11,3, and the value of imports by seven percent. Viewed by sectors, the SR fron January to July in this year exported 49,2 millions euros of food and imported 164,3 billion euros. According to branches of production, the greatest value of imports and exports has been achieved in the manufacturing industry. In this period mostly are imported mineral fuels and lubricants worth of 406,5 millions euros, and mostly exported raw materials, with a total value of 152,7 million euros. For seven months, the Republic of Srpska mostly exported goods to Italy, with a total value of nearly 112 million euros, while to Serbia exported goods worth 113,5 million euros. On the other hand, the greatest value of imports of 345 million euros was achieved with Russia and to Serbia have been exported goods including a value of 219 million euros. Viewed according t groups of countries, to the EU countries have been exported goods worth of 401 millions, while imported from them goods of 474,2 million euros. In dealing with the countries of CEFTA the achieved value of exports amounted to 275,6 million and exports worth of 310,6 million euros [11-14]. In Table 1 and Figure 1 is displayed an overview of foreign trade exchange of the Republic of Srpska including the period from 2005-2012, in millions of euros. Exports to Russia in the amount of 271.018.460, and imports of 1.527.273.500 in 2009, where is achieved a negative foreign trade exchange in the amount of 1.256.255.040. This year, in the period from January to September, the foreign trade exchange of goods is in decline, exports decreased by about 5 %, while imports increased by about 3 %, compared o the sam eperiod in 2011. Volume of exchange of goods of the Republic of Srpska with foreign countries amounted to 2.662.997.210, out of which is referring to exports 928.710.230, and to imports 1.734.286.980, according to the data to the Statistical Office of the Republic of Srpska. From the foregoing it follows that the foreign trade deficit in the period of Januar September of the 2012th year, amounted to 805.576.750, while the export-import ratio was 53,5 %. In the gross domestic product of the Republic of Srpska, exports participates about 18 %. Let s mention an example of Poland, which had avoided the global crisis, because 40 % of its exports participates in GDP. Economic problems are reflected in exports and this has affected to our situation which was not significantly imported to countries such as Spain, Greece, which are affected by the crisis, that s why there is no significant impact to the crisis situation in the Republic of Srpska or in Bosnia and Herzegovina [11-14]. Tab 1: Foreign trade exchange of the Republic of Srpska, For the period 2005-2012. (in tousands of ) [11-14] Year Volume Export Import Balance Exports - Imports ratio 2005. 2006. 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 2011. 20012. (I-IX) 2.083.195,18 576.705,57 1.506.489,61-930.000,00 38,3 % 2.193.224,56 785.199,29 1.408.025,27-622.825,98 55,8 % 2.560.586,03 852.725,57 1.707.860,46-855.134,89 49,9 % 3.093.433,59 980.367,02 2.113.066,57-1.132.699,55 46,4 % 2.673.065,03 853.395,87 1.819.669,16-966.273,29 46,9 % 3.178.530,62 1.110.954,96 2.067.575,66-956.620,70 53,7 % 3.645.415,44 1.306.903,69 2.338.511,75-1.031.608,06 36,5 % 2.662.997,21 928.710,23 1.734.286,98-805.576,75 53,5 % 155

Fig. 1: Overview of foreign trade exchange of the Republic of Srpska, For the period 2005-2012. (in thousands of ) III. OVERVIEW OF EXPORTS AND IMPORTS WITH SIGNIFICANT COUNTRIES If we compare exports by country of destination and imports by country of origin with countries in the region, we will notice a great variety (Table 2, Figure 2, 3, 4 and 5) [11-14]. If we consider the exports by country of destination, highlighting the Republic of Serbia, with which the Republic of Srpska has a large exports, in 2005 amonted to 128.028.000, in 2006 to 131.327.000, in 2007 to 136.162.000, and significantly increased in 2008, 2009 and 2010 amounting to 190.692.000, 170.961.000 and 195.990.000. The largest export was recorded in 2011 and amounted to 243.637.000, while until September 2012 slightly decreased and amounted to 144.858.000. With the same country, the Republic of Srpska achieves deficit and export in 2005 amounted to 402.521.000, in 2006 to 367.731.000, in 2007 to 410.165.000, in 2008 to 559.210.000, in 2009 to 402.072.000, in 2010 to 434.449.000, in 2011 to 420.602.000, and until September 2012 was recorded export worth of 293.842.000. We can conclude that the largest import was in 2008 and amounted to 559.210.000. With Montenegro, volume of export and import is incomarable smaller, where can be immediately noticed the period from 2008 September 2012 surplus. In 2011, the Republic of Srpska recorded exports with Montenegro worth of 76.497.00, and imports of 12.348.000. Similar is the position with Austria with which can be noticed a surplus in the period since 2010 by 2012. Distinguishing characteristics are noticed in relation to Croatia, with whom is recorded a deficit in the years of 2005-2010. But, in 2011 for the first tim eis recorded a surplus and exports with the amount of 170.997.000, and imports of 145.598.000. In the current 2012th year, by the end of September is recorded exports worth of 130.638.000, and imports of 95.270.000, respectively is recoded the positive score. 156

Table 2: Export by country of destination and import by country of origin, with significant countries of the Republic of Srpska (in millions of ) [11-14] Year/ Country Exp./Imp. 2005. 2006. 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 2011. 2012. (I-IX) Serbia Monten. Croatia Slovenia Romania Italily Germany China Austria Hungary Russia Turkey Export 128.028 131.327 136.162 190.692 170.961 195.990 243.637 144.858 Import 402.521 367.731 410.165 559.210 402.072 434.449 420.602 293.842 Export 128.027 131.256-31.389 43.745 12.549 76.497 46.148 Import 402.521 367.731 - - 10.171 8.123 12.348 7.513 Export 56.960 87.692 92.098 111.540 109.549 146.998 170.997 130.638 Import 150.205 172.787 222.934 246.714 115.353 170.150 145.598 95.270 Export 37.503 72.431 70.817 83.380 59.172 107.403 101.204 72.318 Import 76.770 75.586 91.795 106.340 84.470 103.599 105.457 78.520 Export 22.794 33.055 23.201 29.496 6.692 8.793 5.590 5.624 Import 35.070 36.326 - - 14.350 18.223 25.230 21.939 Export 60.086 128.435 144.433 163.600 155.084 173.843 190.302 162.526 Import 160.483 152.626 203.074 224.712 183.292 181.937 197.321 149.112 Export 30.671 75.362 82.480 90.670 73.429 92.722 106.614 74.156 Import 159.386 95.171 123.176 154.086 124.787 118.978 122.718 100.333 Export 0 0 0 0 1.507 3.084 2.064 1.563 Import 34.939 41.350 60.274 87.181 74.874 71.407 90.093 72.858 Export - 33.973 50.562 58.755 52.956 66.583 101.393 82.761 Import 61.220 63.508 66.952 72.881 64.022 63.277 68.737 51.407 Export - - - - 15.624 14.654 30.973 15.948 Import 58.711 69.095 70.592 95.834 43.367 52.862 52.256 49.299 Export - - - - 1.645 1.814 2.061 1.640 Import 43.755 - - - 352.175 483.838 668.335 470.519 Export - - - - 2.384 9.093 13.986 8.138 Import - - 63.077 59.632 17.745 19.302 34.144 20.326 Interesting is the volme of the foreign trade exchange with Slovenia, which is of quite approximate values. Since 2006 until the end of September, exports and imports are nearly equal. In 2005 and 2009 was recorded a visible surplus. A large deficit can be highlighted with Russia, which is especially pronounced in the period since 2009 until the end of September 2012 and amounted to as follows: in 2009 to 350.530.000, in 2010 to 474.745.000, in 2011 to 666.274.000, and in 2012 amounted to 468.879.000. The volume of foreign trade exchange is very important with Germany and Italy, where the surplus is not expressed, but was increased in som eperiods. Over the last few years is noticeable the volume of foreign trade exchange with Turkey, which is currently of small degree. In Table 2 is displayed an overview of foreign trade exchange with certain countries in the world, Europe and region, and in charts the graphical overview of the countries from Table 2 and som esegments of the same table. 157

Fig. 2: Overview of foreign trade exchange with certain countries, Fig. 3: Overview of foreign trade exchange with the neighbouring countries, 158

Fig. 4: Overview of foreign trade exchange with Austria, Fig. 5: Overview of foreign trade exchange with Croatia, IV. CONCLUSION If we look at the Export Promotion Strategy of the Republic of Srpska for the period 2009-2010, in which is defined six strategic objectives: increase of exporters and 159 value of exports, changes in the structure of exports, increase of competitiveness, supstitution of import, connectin of export companies and establishment of efficient institutional framework for the encouragement and promotion of export, we will notice that it is very difficult to implement all the points of this Strategy,

however, there are improvements in some segments. Each plan follows a number of objectives which are supposed to e certain extent. If all the above objectives are met it will be a real success in the economy and a turning point towards the positive score in foreign trade exchange with anyone in the world, and especially in the region. Time series of import and export in the Republic of Srpska can be modeled using regression models 5, 6 and time series models 1-4, 7-10. REFERENCES [1] Bollerslev, T.: A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 69, Issue 3 (August 1987), pp. 542-547. ISSN 0034-6535. [2] Bollerslev, T.: Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 31, Issue 3 (April 1986), pp. 307-327. ISSN 0304-4076. [3] Bollerslev, T.: Glossary to ARCH (GARCH). CREATES Research Paper RP-2008-49. Aarhus (Denmark): Aarhus Universitet (AU), 2008. 42 pp. Available on Web page: ftp://ftp.econ.au.dk/creates/rp/08/rp08_49.pdf. [4] Castagliola, P.: Introduction to time-series modelling. Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 38, Issue 12 (December 2011), pp. 2993-2994. ISSN 0266-4763. [5] Dašić, P.: Application of polynomial regression models for approximation of time series. Journal of Economic and Management Based on New Technologies (JEMoNT), Vol. 1, Issue 2 (2012), pp. 81-160. [6] Dašić, P.: Approximation of cutting tool wear function using polynomial regression equation. Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry (JRaDMI), Vol. 3, Issue 3 (2011), pp. 171-180. ISSN 1821-3103. [7] Engle, R.F.: Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, Vol. 50, Issue 4 (July 1982), pp. 987-1007. ISSN 0012-9682. [8] Engle, R.F.: Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate GARCH models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics (JBES), Vol. 20, Issue 3 (July 2002), pp. 339-350. ISSN 0735-0015. [9] Engle, R.F.: Risk and volatility: Econometric models and financial practice. American Economic Review (AER), Vol. 94, Issue 3 (June 2004), pp. 405-420. ISSN 0002-8282. [10] Engle, R.F. and McFadden, D.L. (editors): Handbook of econometrics, Vol. 4. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier Ltd., 1994. 2111-3155 pp. ISBN 978-0-444-88766-5. [11] Strategija podsticanja izvoza Republike Srpske za perido 2009-2012. Godine, Banja Luka, jun 2009. [12] http://www.fefa.edu.rs/files/ [13] http://www.irbrs.net/statistika.aspx?tab=11&lang=lat [14] http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/website/public/calendarview.aspx?pkey= 37&cType=1&areaId=17 160