PRICE LIST OF FEES FOR USING THE RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE OF TRACK WIDTH 1435 MM MANAGED BY PKP POLSKIE LINIE KOLEJOWE S.A. APPLICABLE AS OF 10 DECEMBER

Similar documents
Incentive Discounts Programme for Traffic Development at Sofia Airport 2018

PPR REGULATIONS FOR BUSINESS AND GENERAL AVIATION AT EINDHOVEN AIRPORT

AGREEMENT ON THE ALLOCATION OF RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY

All aviation except commercial aviation. Including but not limited to business aviation, air taxi operations and technical flights.

Tariffs for Aerodrome Services. at the John Paul II International Airport Kraków-Balice. k r a k o w a i r p o r t. p l

RONSON DEVELOPMENT SE SHAREHOLDERS CIRCULAR DATED JULY 20 th 2018

luxaviation S.A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS

Terms and Conditions of the Carrier

General Conditions of Carriage for Rail Passengers (GCC-CIV/PRR)

Capacity declaration Amsterdam Airport Schiphol; winter 2017/2018. Environmental capacity; available number of slots for Commercial Aviation

FRAMEWORK TRACK ACCESS AGREEMENT FOR PASSENGER SERVICES. Dated August Between HS1 LIMITED. and EUROSTAR (U.K.) LIMITED

Grade Crossing Regulations

Official Journal of the European Union L 186/27

LaudaMotion GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS (GTCB) VERSION OF LAUDAMOTION GMBH

NOTICE 1063 OF 2012 AIRPORTS COMPANY SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED. AIRPORTS COMPANY ACT, 1993 (ACT No. 44 OF 1993), AS AMENDED PUBLICATION OF AIRPORT CHARGES

AIRPORT CHARGES TARIFF AT WARSAW CHOPIN AIRPORT

General Terms and Conditions (GTC) of Germania Fluggesellschaft mbh ("Germania")

e-romancecar Terms of Service

RECOMMENDATION ECAC/16-1 AIR CARRIERS LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO PASSENGERS

APPROVED BY: Director of the Sales Department of PJSC Aeroflot on May 30, 2016

TREATY SERIES 2007 Nº 73

AIRPORT CHARGES REGULATION

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Orlando International Airport One Jeff Fuqua Boulevard Orlando, Florida Memorandum TO: FROM:

AIRPORT CHARGES TARIFF AT WARSAW CHOPIN AIRPORT

AIRPORT CHARGES REGULATION

In this document the following words shall have the following meanings: Airport Coordination Limited, the Coordinator of London City Airport

General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) Customer Protection Rights Regulation

AC Bid Upgrade. Terms and Conditions

Schedule of Fees and Charges for Memmingen Airport (EDJA / FMM)

1 Introduction 2 2 Acknowledgements 2 3 Differences between Green Star SA rating tools 2 4 About the Calculator 2 5 How to Use the Calculator 2

Aurizon Network Public Quarterly Performance Report. 4th Quarter 2017/18 April - June 2018

SERVICE AGREEMENT. The Parties agree as follows: 1. SERVICE AGREEMENT:

Honouring of Tickets [1]

Aurizon Network Public Quarterly Performance Report 2nd Quarter 2017/18 October - December 2017

Terms of Transport with the TRAINOSE S.A trains and buses What you need to know when traveling with us

STANSTED AIRPORT LIMITED REGULATORY ACCOUNTS PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH Financial Review...1. Performance Report...

National Air Transport Facilitation Program Kingdom of Bahrain

REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIONS

11. Pursuant to Article 74(6) of its Rules the Constitutional Court decided as set out in the enacting clause of this Decision.

Annex 5: Technical Terms and Conditions for Lot IV: Committee of the Regions

Price sheet of Open Grid Europe GmbH for entry and exit contracts as well as internal orders in accordance with Cooperation Agreement VIII

ENR-5 FLIGHT PLANNING

Briefing: ICAO Council discussion on including aviation in the EU-ETS

Damage to cargo, Inadmissible passengers,bird strikes Berin Riđanović X World Airport Lawyers Association Conference London, October

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

1.2. The meeting agreed a set of guiding principles that officers were to use in developing the revised Terms of Reference.

CAAC Continuing Airworthiness of Domestic Designed Transport Airplanes

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 March /09 Interinstitutional File: 2009/0042 (COD) AVIATION 41 CODEC 349 PROPOSAL

2 NO GOVENMENT GAZETTE, 30 DECEMBE 2009 IMPOTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not recei

COMMUTING MASS TRANSPORT CALCULATOR GUIDE Version 1.0

HEATHROW NIGHT MOVEMENT AND QUOTA ALLOCATION PROCEDURES Version 3

PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION BRANCH MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE LICENCE. Passenger Transportation Licence COPY

REGULATIONS FOR THE PROVISION OF TOURIST SERVICES AND EVENTS 1 (TERMS OF USE) 2 (DEFINITIONS) 3 (RESERVATIONS) by UTC Tour Operator Sp. z o.o.

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

United Global Performance Commitment 2017

STANSTED AIRPORT PLANNING APPLICATION UTT/18/0460/FUL SECTION 106 CONDITIONS TO BE REQUIRED IF PLANNING APPLICATION IS APPROVED

1.2 Notwithstanding the provision in 1.1 this BL applies to the airport in Denmark with the most passenger movements.

City of Port St. Lucie Planning and Zoning Department ALL DATES ARE TENTATIVE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE SCHEDULES FOR 2018

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP SAFDURJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI.

Terms & Conditions 1. Definitions: 2. Confirmed Aircraft Charters & Rentals: Aircraft Catering s Responsibilities and Obligations: 3.

New ICAO Runway Safety Provisions

THE USE OF LIGHT AIRCRAFT IN DOMESTIC TRANSPORT IN POLAND

Revision of the Third Air Package

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ACCOMMODATION RULES. The Ostrava Facility 28.října 170, Ostrava

Competition Promotion in Transport Services: The Case of Railways in Peru

GHANA S ACTION PLAN ON CO 2 EMISSIONS REDUCTION ACTIVITIES

ENR 1.1 GEN. RULES (Insert para 13 in ENR 1.1 of AIP India as follows)

Any variations from the Terms and Conditions of Contract will only come into effect after written confirmation by ProAir Aviation GmbH

TARIFF OF INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES AT WARSAW CHOPIN AIRPORT

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CIVIL AVIATION DEPARTMENT OC No. 02 of 2018 O/O DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION DATE : 11 June 2018

CITY OF DALLAS The Honorable Members of the Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure and Sustainability

OVERVIEW OF THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISMS IN ICAO

Criteria for an application for and grant of, or a variation to, an ATOL: fitness, competence and Accountable Person

Amendment 13 to Annex 14, Volume I

Transport, Department of/ Vervoer, Departement van DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT NO DECEMBER 2015

LASORS SECTION E INSTRUMENT RATING, INSTRUMENT METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS RATING AND NIGHT QUALIFICATION

Part 121 CERTIFICATION AND OPERATIONS: AIR

MEMBERSHIP, ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMPANY

APPLICATION OF THE NO-SPECIAL-FEE SYSTEM IN THE BALTIC SEA AREA

TARIFF OF HARBOUR DUES

The organisation of the Airbus. A330/340 flight control system. Ian Sommerville 2001 Airbus flight control system Slide 1

San Mateo County Airports Policies and Procedures for Hangars, T-Shades, Tiedowns and Waiting Lists

MD HELICOPTERS, INC.

N Registry Airworthiness & Maintenance Requirements

Administration and Projects Committee Meeting STAFF REPORT July 3, 2014 Page 2 of 2 Agreement Consultant Project General Scope CT 107 URS Corporation

General Transport Terms and Conditions

Regulations on Passenger Service Facility Charge for International Flights at Kansai International Airport

AIR SERVICE INCENTIVE PROGRAM

FINNAIR Corporate Programme Terms of agreement UNITED KINGDOM GENERAL

SUPERSEDED [ U] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Federal Aviation Administration. 14 CFR Part 39 [66 FR /5/2001]

Annex I: Model aircraft activity

GRESHAM CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TYPE: DECISION

ASL AVIATION TERMS OF AIRCRAFT USE AND RENTAL AGREEMENT

TEAM TRAVEL ITINERARIES (September 2017)

Case No IV/M British Airways / TAT (II) REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/08/1996

REGULATIONS FOR DECLARATION AND DISPOSAL OF UNCLAIMED ITEMS OF THE PIRAEUS CONTAINER TERMINAL S.A. IN THE PIRAEUS FREE ZONE

INFORMATION FOR PARTICIPANTS

Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. Implementing Standards (Issued under Sec. 120, Civil Aviation Act No. 14 of 2010)

Transcription:

Annex to Resolution No. 795/2017 of the Management Board of by PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. of 25 July 2017 PRICE LIST OF FEES FOR USING THE RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE OF TRACK WIDTH 1435 MM MANAGED BY PKP POLSKIE LINIE KOLEJOWE S.A. APPLICABLE AS OF 10 DECEMBER 2017 1. Fee for processing the application for assigning the infrastructure capacity 2. Unit rates of the basic fee for minimum access to railway infrastructure 3. The manner of determining reservations fees 4. The manner of determining the fee for parking train vehicles 5. The manner of determining the fee for preparing a case study of train timetable Price list of fees for using the railway infrastructure of track width 1435 mm applicable as of 10 December 2017, adopted for use by Resolution No. 795/2017 of the Management Board of PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe of 25 July 2017 Warsaw, 2017.

1. Fee for processing the application for assigning the infrastructure capacity The fee charged from applicants for processing the application for assigning the infrastructure capacity amounts to: PLN 100 The fee for processing the application for assigning the infrastructure capacity is charged from applicants if infrastructure capacity was not assigned on the basis, except for situations in which infrastructure capacity was not assigned due to reasons caused by PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. 2. Unit rates of the basic fee for minimum access to railway infrastructure [PLN/pockm] 1.1. Passenger trains line 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 M<60 1.99 2.97 4.01 5.70 M<60 2.40 3.43 4.55 6.41 7.80 60 M<120 2.21 3.21 4.29 6.05 60 M<120 2.62 3.68 4.83 6.77 8.22 120 M<180 2.49 3.52 4.64 6.50 120 M<180 2.91 3.99 5.19 7.22 8.76 180 M<240 2.87 3.94 5.11 7.09 180 M<240 3.29 4.41 5.66 7.82 9.47 240 M<300 3.22 4.32 5.55 7.64 240 M<300 3.64 4.80 6.10 8.37 10.13 300 M<360 3.58 4.72 6.00 8.21 300 M<360 4.01 5.21 6.56 8.96 10.82 360 M<420 3.91 5.09 6.42 8.74 360 M<420 4.34 5.57 6.98 9.48 11.44 420 M<480 4.15 5.35 6.71 9.11 420 M<480 4.58 5.84 7.28 9.86 11.90 480 M<540 4.55 5.79 7.21 9.74 480 M<540 4.98 6.28 7.79 10.50 12.65 540 M<600 4.87 6.14 7.61 10.25 540 M<600 5.30 6.64 8.19 11.01 13.26 600 M<660 5.18 6.49 8.00 10.73 600 M<660 5.62 6.98 8.58 11.50 13.84 660 M<720 5.48 6.82 8.39 11.22 660 M<720 5.93 7.32 8.97 11.99 14.43 720 M<780 5.81 7.18 8.79 11.73 720 M<780 6.25 7.68 9.37 12.50 15.03 780 M<840 6.10 7.50 9.16 12.19 780 M<840 6.55 8.01 9.75 12.97 15.59 840 M<900 6.44 7.88 9.58 12.73 840 M<900 6.89 8.38 10.17 13.51 16.23 900 M 6.94 8.43 10.20 13.51 900 M 7.39 8.94 10.80 14.30 17.18 1.2. Freight trains Railway line category line Total gross weight M [t] 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 M<60 1.99 2.97 4.01 M<60 2.40 3.43 4.55 6.41 7.80 60 M<120 2.21 3.21 4.29 60 M<120 2.62 3.68 4.83 6.77 8.22 120 M<180 2.49 3.52 4.64 120 M<180 2.91 3.99 5.19 7.22 8.76 180 M<240 2.87 3.94 5.11 180 M<240 3.29 4.41 5.66 7.82 9.47 Page 2 of 5

Railway line category line Total gross weight M [t] 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 240 M<300 3.22 4.32 5.55 240 M<300 3.64 4.80 6.10 8.37 10.13 300 M<360 3.58 4.72 6.00 300 M<360 4.01 5.21 6.56 8.96 10.82 360 M<420 3.91 5.09 6.42 360 M<420 4.34 5.57 6.98 9.48 11.44 420 M<480 4.15 5.35 6.71 420 M<480 4.58 5.84 7.28 9.86 11.90 480 M<540 4.55 5.79 7.21 480 M<540 4.98 6.28 7.79 10.50 12.65 540 M<600 4.87 6.14 7.61 540 M<600 5.30 6.64 8.19 11.01 13.26 600 M<660 5.18 6.49 8.00 600 M<660 5.62 6.98 8.58 11.50 13.84 660 M<720 5.48 6.82 8.39 660 M<720 5.93 7.32 8.97 11.99 14.43 720 M<780 5.81 7.18 8.79 720 M<780 6.25 7.68 9.37 12.50 15.03 780 M<840 6.10 7.50 9.16 780 M<840 6.55 8.01 9.75 12.97 15.59 840 M<900 6.44 7.88 9.58 840 M<900 6.89 8.38 10.17 13.51 16.23 900 M<1000 6.94 8.43 10.20 900 M<1000 7.39 8.94 10.80 14.30 17.18 1000 M<1100 7.42 8.95 10.80 1000 M<1100 7.87 9.47 11.41 15.06 18.08 1100 M<1200 7.93 9.52 11.45 1100 M<1200 8.40 10.05 12.06 15.89 19.07 1200 M<1300 8.50 10.15 12.16 1200 M<1300 8.97 10.68 12.78 16.79 20.14 1300 M<1400 9.03 10.73 12.82 1300 M<1400 9.50 11.26 13.44 17.63 21.13 1400 M<1500 9.59 11.35 13.52 1400 M<1500 10.06 11.89 14.15 18.52 22.20 1500 M<1600 10.10 11.91 14.16 1500 M<1600 10.58 12.46 14.80 19.34 23.16 1600 M<1700 10.64 12.51 14.84 1600 M<1700 11.13 13.06 15.48 20.20 24.19 1700 M<1800 11.16 13.08 15.49 1700 M<1800 11.65 13.63 16.14 21.03 25.17 1800 M<1900 11.74 13.72 16.21 1800 M<1900 12.23 14.28 16.86 21.95 26.27 1900 M<2000 12.24 14.27 16.84 1900 M<2000 12.74 14.83 17.50 22.74 27.21 2000 M<2100 12.82 14.91 17.57 2000 M<2100 13.32 15.48 18.23 23.67 28.32 2100 M<2200 13.31 15.45 18.18 2100 M<2200 13.81 16.02 18.85 24.45 29.24 2200 M<2300 13.88 16.08 18.90 2200 M<2300 14.39 16.66 19.57 25.36 30.33 2300 M<2400 14.41 16.66 19.56 2300 M<2400 14.93 17.25 20.24 26.20 31.33 2400 M<2500 14.98 17.29 20.26 2400 M<2500 15.50 17.88 20.95 27.10 32.40 2500 M<2600 15.36 17.71 20.74 2500 M<2600 15.88 18.30 21.44 27.71 33.12 2600 M<2700 15.98 18.39 21.52 2600 M<2700 16.51 19.00 22.22 28.70 34.30 2700 M<2800 16.44 18.91 22.10 2700 M<2800 16.98 19.51 22.81 29.45 35.18 2800 M<2900 17.06 19.58 22.87 2800 M<2900 17.60 20.20 23.59 30.42 36.34 2900 M<3000 17.50 20.08 23.43 2900 M<3000 18.05 20.69 24.15 31.13 37.19 3000 M 17.71 20.30 23.69 3000 M 18.25 20.92 24.41 31.46 37.58 Page 3 of 5

3. The manner of determining reservations fees 3.1. Reservation free charged from applicants for failure to use the assigned infrastructure capacity The reservation free is charged from applications for failure to use the assigned infrastructure capacity if the applicant fails to indicate the railway undertaking which should use the assigned infrastructure capacity, or if the railway undertaking indicated by the applicant fails to conclude an agreement with PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. for use of infrastructure capacity, amounts to 100% basic fee for the planned journey, however not less than PLN 1000. 3.2. Reservation fee for failure to use the assigned train route If the railway undertaking fails to use, due to reasons attributable to such undertaking, the whole or part of the train route assigned within the annual train timetable, the reservation fee for the unused part of the assigned train route amounts to: 1) 25% of the basic fee for the planned train journey: a) in case of failure to file a resignation from the assigned route, b) for the period from the date of filing the resignation until the day preceding the date of implementation of the change of the train timetable for which the deadline for filing applications has not expired yet; 2) 5% of the basic fee for the planned train journey in case of filing a resignation from the assigned route, for the period from the date of implementation of the change of the train timetable for which the deadline for filing applications has not expired yet until the end of the period in which the annual train timetable is applicable. The fee referred to in point 2 shall not be charged for the period in which the train timetable was changed at the request of the manager. If the railway undertaking fails to use, due to reasons attributable to such undertaking, the whole or part of the train route assigned in a mode other than within the annual train timetable, the reservation fee for the unused part of the assigned train route amounts to: 1) 25% of the basic fee for the planned train journey in cases of failure to file a resignation form the assigned route or in case of filing such resignation less than 12 hours prior to the planned launch of the train; 2) 20% of the basic fee for the planned train journey in case of filing a resignation from the assigned route more than 12 hours and less than 36 hours prior to the planned launch of the train; 3) 15% of the basic fee for the planned train journey in case of filing a resignation from the assigned route more than 36 hours and less than 72 hours prior to the planned launch of the train; 4) 10% of the basic fee for the planned train journey in case of filing a resignation from the assigned route more than 72 hours and less than 30 days prior to the planned launch of the train. Reservation fees shall not be charged if failure to use the train route is a result of an application for assigning the train route regarding modification of the assigned train route filed within the change of the train timetable. In case of failure to use the part of the assigned infrastructure capacity which is a result of reduction of the planned train weight by the railway undertaking, a reservation fee shall be charged, amounting to 50% reduction of the basic fee being a result of reduction of the train weight which does not require a change of the assigned train route. Page 4 of 5

4. The manner of determining the fee for parking train vehicles The fee for parking train vehicle for not less than 2 hours is calculated as a product of the time of parking and the unit rate amounting to: 1,48 [PLN/hour of parking/track]. 5. The manner of determining the fee for preparing a case study of train timetable The fee for preparing a case study of train timetable is determined as a product of the time dedicated to preparation of a case study of train timetable and the unit rate amounting to: 57.92 [PLN/hour]. Page 5 of 5