Please accept the following comments on behalf of Wild Virginia the proposed Back Draft Timber Sale Project.

Similar documents
National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

3.12 Roadless Areas and Unroaded Areas

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Thank you for this second opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

Southern Shenandoah Valley Chapter

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

Alternative 3 Prohibit Road Construction, Reconstruction, and Timber Harvest Except for Stewardship Purposes B Within Inventoried Roadless Areas

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project

Colorado s forests are slated to lose thousands of miles of roads through the new OHV Route Designation process. DON T LET IT HAPPEN!

Mt. Hood National Forest

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

GREENWOOD VEGETATION MANAGEMENT

2.0 PARK VISION AND ROLES

Chuckanut Ridge Fairhaven Highlands EIS Scoping Concerns

April 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,

Response to Public Comments

WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

Connie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Map 1.1 Wenatchee Watershed Land Ownership

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

Thank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

Whitefish Range Partnership Tentatively Approved by WRP 11/18/2013!Rec. Wilderness Page 1

BLANKET CREEK PROVINCIAL PARK

Appalachian Mountain Club

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

Final Recreation Report. Sunflower Allotment Grazing Analysis. July 2015

Nov. 19 th Public Workshop Summary

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008

Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018

Other Agencies and Organizations

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

5.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT

Trout-West Fuels Reduction Project Pike/San Isabel National Forest Recreation Specialist Report Jan Langerman

OPEN SPACE. The Open Space Element describes the County s goals and policies with respect to open space areas and addresses the following topics:

Objection Reviewing Officer USDA Forest Service, Northern Region PO Box 7669 Missoula, MT 59807

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

KANANASKIS COUNTRY PROVINCIAL RECREATION AREAS MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE - November 20, 2007

PAUL S PLACE ELK, DEER AND VIEWS FISHTAIL, MONTANA

Mickelson Connector Feasibility Study

Massanutten Mountain Cluster

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

Non-motorized Trail Plan & Proposal. August 8, 2014

Restore and implement protected status that is equivalent, or better than what was lost during the mid-1990 s

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE EXISTING SETTING EXPANDING PARKLAND

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

Dungeness Recreation Area County Park Master Plan

Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS. Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

Wallace Falls State Park Classification and Management Planning Stage 3 Preliminary Recommendations July 18, 2018 Sultan City Hall

Pembina Valley Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

USDA Trails Strategy WRI: ENGLISH PEAK SURVEY. Theodore Mendoza San Diego State University June 6 th 2016 August 18 th Advisor: Sam Commarto

Recreation Effects Report Travel Management

MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BIGHORN BACKCOUNTRY ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN

Cataloochee. Fishing Species Rainbow Trout and Brook Trout. Recreation

Silver Lake Park An Environmental Jewel for the Citizens of Prince William County

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

A GIS Analysis of Probable High Recreation Use Areas in Three Sisters Wilderness Deschutes and Willamette National Forests

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

Summary of prescribed fires in Prince Albert National Park 2015

APPENDIX D: SUSTAINABLE TRAIL DESIGN. APPENDICES Town of Chili Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update

Blanco Creek Ranch Acres, Uvalde County, Texas

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF RECREATION AND PARKS RECREATIONAL CARRYING CAPACITY GUIDELINES

Dogwood Lane Trail Guide

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa

Coconino National Forest Potential Wilderness Proposal

The Design of Nature Reserves

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

26 Utah s Patchwork Parkway SCENIC BYWAY CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN (SR 143)

Appendix A BC Provincial Parks System Goals

Procedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012

Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District

SOCIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES.

3.0 EXISTING PARK & RECREATION SPACE

S Central Coast Heritage Protection Act APRIL 21, 2016

Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project

The following criteria were used to identify Benchmark Areas:

SOUTH INTERCHANGE AREA

Appalachian Mountain Club

Stephens State Park Trails

Allegheny Mountain Cluster

Pinellas County Environmental Lands

112th CONGRESS. 1st Session H. R. 113 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Stephens Rd. Nature Preserve

This Passport: Revised October 20, 2017, EAM # Discovering the Trails of Webster, NY

Kicking the Alpine Plants Out Mountain Goat Wallows In Mount Peale Research Natural Area (La Sal Mountains, Utah)

Big Schloss Cluster. Church Mountain

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

Securing Permanent Protection for Public Land

Piedra River Protection Workgroup Meeting #5 Feb. 21, 2012 Ross Aragon Community Center, Pagosa Springs

Chambers of Commerce and Lake Groups advertised this NCWRPC created online survey that was : Opened: August 22, 2012; and Closed: October 4, 2012.

March 14, SUBJECT: Public input to the Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison Field Office, Travel Management Plan

Hudson Highlands Fjord Trail Draft Master Plan. April 29, 2015

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis River-Barrier Lake. Bow Valley Provincial Park

HIGHWAY 17 WILDLIFE and REGIONAL TRAIL CROSSINGS

Land Use. Grasslands and Rangelands National Parks and Reserves. Thursday, October 9, 14

Evaluation of Outstanding Remarkable Values for Collawash River March 2011

MAIN LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK

Rogue Gorge (Mt. Stella) Roadless Area-- T30S R3E (primarily in portions of Sections 23, 26, 33, 34 & 35)

Transcription:

P.O. Box 1065 Charlottesville, VA 22902 (434) 971-1553 www.wildvirginia.org August 29, 2008 Elwood Burge, District Ranger North River Ranger District Back Draft Scoping Comments 401 Oakwood Drive Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Dear Elwood, Please accept the following comments on behalf of Wild Virginia the proposed Back Draft Timber Sale Project. The project is located on Walker Mountain, a 5596 acre Virginia Mountain Treasure area. I made three site visits, August 12, 18 and 26 and surveyed all units and compartments. Note that we are submitting comments both in print and electronically. The electronic comments contain pictures which should be included for the record. Findings: Cutting units 6-15 are all located in proximity to FS 384 and have been in management for quite a while. FS 384 for over 2/3 of its length is a lush carpet of Microstegium vimineum (Japanese Stiltgrass). In most areas it covered the entire 20-25 feet of roadbed and all past loading and deck sites. (see pictures #1,#2) Units 11 and 12 are in a particularly moist seep area that is obviously an ephemeral stream bed. Here was found flora remarkably different from anywhere else in the project area. This is one of two biologically sensitive areas I surveyed. Units 16 and 17 are most sensitive areas. These units are situated in and along a moderately steep ravine with particularly beautiful geologic rock formations throughout. The forests on either side of the ravine had large trees which, given the location, are likely older than they appear. (pic. #3) Although there is a stand age of 99-103 years given in the scoping notice, no old growth survey information was included. The notice said that no old growth survey had been done in these units. Note that there were many signs of black bear here with a few bear trails (and scat) moving up the mountain in the upper part of the ravine in Unit 17 and in the area just above it.

The gated Walker Mountain Valley Road, FS 387 on the crest of Walker Mountain was also a 25 foot wide carpet of Microstegium (pic. #4 and #5). The other most dominant species was Alliaria petiolata (Garlic Mustard), another problematic invasive. The north end of FS387 was tank trapped and beyond it a foot trail continued connecting to Back Draft Trail. While the first 100 feet or so had some semblance of a road bed which had become overgrown for many decades into a foot path, beyond was clearly a foot trail, which was even blazed in yellow, clearly marking it as such (pic. #6). My map labels it as Walker Mountain Trail. Many of the largest individual trees line both sides of this foot trail. Units 18 (pic. #18), 19 (pics # 19 & 20) and 20 are located along this trail. The proposed new road construction linking this area to Clayton Mills Road is, at the top eastern ridge, extremely steep and contains beautiful and fragile geologic formations. There is no way not to destroy incredible steep rocky cliffs in the building of this road. Helicopter units 1, 2, 3 (pic. #16 & 17) and 4 (pic. #15) are located in a beautiful and remote location of Walker Mountain, just over the ridge from Back Draft Trail. These areas hold some of the most beautiful and remote forest in the project area. They are dry and relatively unproductive sites and do not show any evidence logging in perhaps a century. No old growth inventory has been done for these sites and, because of the slope and dryness of the site, may be significantly older than it appears. The proposed helicopter deck on the edge of Unit 5 is located directly adjacent to the Back Draft trail and on the opposite side of Back Draft Trail from the proposed helicopter Units #1-4. Unit 5 is a rich lowland area with active streams throughout including Back Draft (pic # 8, 13 & 14). Units 21-25 are on the east side of Walker Mountain. The road that accesses unit 22 is also a carpet of stiltgrass, as are the existing road beds that lead to Units 23 and 24 along the Sam Judd Ramsey Trail on either side of FR 61 (pic. #11). Unit 23 overlaps and is adjacent to the trail. Unit 24, although it is proposed that is accessed by the road bed which is Sam Judd Ramsey Trail, the majority of the mature timber lies directly alongside FR 61 (see pic. #12). The roadbed leading to and beyond Unit 25 is often a closed mat of Microstegium and large cluster patches of Autumn Olive, Elaeagnus umbellate extending up Walker Mountain Road (pic. #10) The project area is under Management Area 15. Given the existing conditions we found in the project area it is clear that a significant reduction in the scope or elimination of this project would not violate prescriptions for the project area and not conflict with the existing management prescription. Comments: FS Road 384 has become a huge highway for movement of Microstegium into more interior areas of Walker Mountain. So has Walker Mountain Road. The obvious use of these roads combined with increased sunlight from the absence of forest canopy along the road has made these vectors for increased invasive populations beyond the road itself. Because Microstegium is very shade tolerant, is characterized by prolific seeding and loves moist areas and streamsides, any use of these road, new roadbuilding or

disturbances (units 6-25) will result in increasing its population and range further into more remote areas of Walker Mountain. This is directly contrary to the stated goal of USDA Strategic Plans which identify one of the 4 major threats to forests as the introduction and spread of non-native invasive species (NNIS), which degrade habitat for many native species and diminish biodiversity. Every aspect of this project, roadbuilding, thinning, shelterwood cuts, grapevine/croptree release, linear wildlife openings, deck sites, and all new system and temporary roads, are in direct contradiction to this directive. In fact, the most direct result of this project will be to immediately increase the population and range of Microstegium to over 600 acres of Walker Mountain and the long term effects could be catastrophic. The areas most dramatically impacted will be the more remote areas and moist sites. There is no way to mitigate significantly these negative impacts to Walker Mountain. For this reason, units 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 should be dropped from the project. Units 1, 2, 3 and 4 and units 16 and 17 have not been inventoried for old growth although they contain some of the oldest stand ages in this project. These areas, units 1, 2, 3, 4, 16 and 17 must be inventoried for old growth and the project should be re-scoped with this additional critical information. Because of the sensitive biota of the moist and ephemeral stream areas in units 11 and 12, because of the destruction and erosion by the roadbuilding necessary to access them, and because of the Microstegium issue mentioned above, units 11 and 12 should be dropped from the project. Because of their most remote location, significant slope and sensitive geological areas, units 16 and 17 should be dropped. Because of this and of the Microstegium issue mentioned above, the proposal to build 1.1 mile of new system road here should also be abandoned. Cutting units 18, 19 and 20 will negatively impact the foot trail now passing through the project area. The existing foot trail would be converted to system road which would negatively impact this for use of the trail by hikers, hunters and equestrians. This is the only area on the top of Walker Mountain which retains any natural character as a narrow mountaintop plateau. It is one of the most scenic and most geologically significant remaining area remaining on the crest of Walker Mountain. Therefore, units 18, 19 and 20 should be dropped from the project. The linear wildlife opening and grapevine/croptree release units that connect Clayton Mill Creek with Walker Mountain Road would open up the eastern slope of Walker Mountain to a huge increase of Microstegium. The entire linear wildlife opening and adjacent cutting units 21, 22 and 23 should be dropped from the project. Helicopter units 1, 2, 3 (pic. #16 & 17) and 4 (pic. #15) are located in a beautiful and remote location of Walker Mountain, just over the ridge from Back Draft Trail. These areas hold some of the most beautiful and remote forest in the project area. They are dry and relatively unproductive sites which, if logged would not be easily regenerated. Since these units lie just less than 100 feet from private land and because of the slope, logging here will negatively impact the private lands, increasing runoff and sedimentation. These areas do not show any evidence logging in perhaps a century. The forest is much better served by allowing these areas to remain uncut as it is just now becoming a stand with undeniable old growth characteristics. Old Growth is one of the rarest forest types in the GW and while many areas are more appropriate for thinning and wildlife nurturing, these

areas are better managed for old growth. In addition, given the rising cost of fuel and helicopter transportation, it does not now appear that it will be cost effective to invade these areas, especially given their inherent ecological value. No old growth evaluation has been done for these units, which is imperative to fully access the ecological significance of the area. For these reasons, units 1, 2, 3, and 4 should be dropped from the project. The proposed helicopter deck next to cutting unit #5 is directly adjacent to the scenic Back Draft Trail. This area holds some of the most beautiful forest along this trail. A huge area would be cleared and compacted for loading and helicopter landing. The opening up of the canopy in Unit 5 and use of equipment will open up the area of Back Draft Trail to Microstegium invasion. It is also likely that this activity will create pockets of invasion in units 1-4. In a moist, fertile area with many ephemeral and existing streams, this area would be significantly and negatively impacted by any logging. Because of the impacts to the trail, combined with the aforementioned comments regarding units 1-4 above, Unit 5 and all proposed helicopter logging in this project should be cancelled. Because of the huge problem with populations of stiltgrass expanding its range into the interior or Walker Mountain, Units 22 and 23 and 25 should be dropped from the sale. The Linear wildlife opening along Unit 23 that connects to Walker Mountain Road will turn into a carpet of invasive Microstegium. Opening the canopy will also likely allow Autumn Olive to establish a foothold in the dry openings created, as it has along south/eastern parts of Walker Mountain Road.. Conclusion: Walker Mountain is a lovely Mountain Treasure Ares. Back Draft Trail and Sam Judd Ramsey Trails are great assets to the area, allowing primitive access and pass through beautiful geologic and wooded areas. The eastern side of Walker, when you combine the trails with FR 61 and Walker Mountain Road contains loop access for mountain bikes and equestrian opportunities. Sale units 18-25 would severely physically and visually degrade and impact these recreational possibilities. Walker Mountain Road is a great example of why these sale units and the linear wildlife opening should be dropped. Walker Mountain is a virtual carpet of Microstegium throughout its entire 7+ mile length. It is clear that the wildlife corridor proposed on the east side of Walker Mountain would quickly follow suit. It has allowed shade-tolerant Microstegium to begin intruding beyond the roadbed and can be found moving deeper into the woods on both sides of the roadbed. Because even the harvest of helicopter units 1-4 need the helicopter landing dock on the edge of unit 5, even these are connected with perpetuating this problem. It is clear that the main use of Walker Mountain is for hiking, horse riding and hunting. Most of the management has been for wildlife. Shooting ranges and hunt clubs exist in profusion on surrounding lands. We found numerous illegal tree stands (and empty cans of deer scent ) in the cove above Units 16 and 17. Walker Mountain Road, the forest openings along its edges and the cleared loading docks from past sales provide abundant openings for grouse and turkey and deer.

The main problem with Microstegium is that it loves to travel along with the hunters and their vehicles during hunting season. Patches we noticed in mid August are already beginning to develop seeds. They remain viable for 5 years or more. This is a problem that will not go away but can be slowed only by limiting access of vehicles and by taking no actions that remove the canopy or extend roads deeper into Walker Mountain. We believe that hunting can continue to be a viable use of Walker Mountain but it is problematic as management for early successional habitat, wildlife openings and thinning of the overstory creates greater opportunities for invasives than it does for wildlife. Increasing access for management and hunting also facilitates Microstegium migration and dispersal as it will be the first to colonize openings and restrict the ability of other wildlife forage. Even disturbing existing forage areas may make these areas less able to sustain the forage it currently holds. Multiple use can continue on Walker Mountain only if some rare and important areas are not managed for early succession, overstory removal, thinning and logging. The Back Draft Timber Sale will result in a huge expansion of Microstegium in population and in range in Walker Mountain. This is in direct contradiction to FS directives. The project is being scoped under the 1993 Forest Plan and implementation of this project will directly affect the condition of the project area so as to eliminate the project areas from consideration which would result in a higher level of protection in the Revised Plan than is afforded under MA 15. If this project goes forth it will eliminate the project area from such consideration. Therefore implementation of this project at this point will compromise the planning process and the integrity of the project area and should, therefore, be at the very least postponed and rescoped after the new plan has been adopted. For all the reasons stated above, we ask that the entire Back Draft Timber Sale and all proposed road building and expansion be cancelled. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please keep us informed of any action taken on this project. Sincerely, Ernie Reed, for Wild Virginia Cc: Sarah Francisco, SELC Sherman Bamford, VAFW and Sierra Club Carol Lena Miller, VWC