PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

Similar documents
PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

Network Manager Adding value to the Network 29 September 2011

Hosted by General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA)

Performance fabec air navigation service providers

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - June 2012

EUROCONTROL. Visit of the Transport Attachés. 10 April Frank Brenner. Director General EUROCONTROL

Network Operations Performance

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - August 2012

Monthly Network Operations Report

Traffic, delays and forecasts European summer traffic falls outlook for modest long-term growth

InterFAB Ops meeting Traffic volatility in Brussels hotspot sectors

Network Management, building on our experience of flow management and network planning.

ATM in Europe It s all about Performance

Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis February 2019

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - May 2012

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - March 2012

NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT September 2011

Monthly Network Operations Report

Monthly Network Operations Report

ANNUAL NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT Main Report

Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis January 2019

Performance Planning Environment. Bernhard Mayr, CM Financial and Performance Committee, 23 May 2014

FABEC Operations. From a project-driven approach to continuous operational improvements

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - July 2012

European Performance Scheme

Monthly Network Operations Report

NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT OCTOBER 2011

Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis November 2018

Analysis of most constraining en route ATFM regulations, attributed to ATC capacity, during 2017

Performance Planning Operations: Environment. Bernhard Mayr, CM TF Performance, MoT Germany 20 May 2011

Follow up to the implementation of safety and air navigation regional priorities XMAN: A CONCEPT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ATFCM CROSS-BORDER EXCHANGES

Monthly Network Operations Report

SIMULATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AIRSPACE

Monthly Network Operations Report

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis November 2012

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis February 2013

Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis December 2018

Monthly Network Operations Report

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - April 2012

Monthly Network Operations Report

ATFM delay report August Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

Customer Relations Programme

The Network Manager User Forum 2017

Monthly Network Operations Report

InterFAB Cooperation: XMAN Implementing Extended Cross-Border Arrival Management. World ATM Congress Madrid, 8 March 2016

Monthly Network Operations Report

EU Report. Europe AUGUST 2017

Case study London Heathrow & London Heathrow-Amsterdam

EUROCONTROL General Presentation

Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)

Luxembourg TMA Contingency measures. Clear the sky procedure & Agreement on service continuity

Monthly Network Operations Report

Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis September 2018

ANNEX ANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU).../...

Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)

EUROCONTROL. An introduction to the EUROCONTROL Network Manager Operations Centre

Single European Sky Benefits for the airline industry. Warsaw, 28 November 2011

ATFM delay report October Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report December Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

AMAN RESEARCH IN SESAR

SES Performance Scheme

ATFM delay report November Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

Monthly Network Operations Report

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION EUROCONTROL. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No /.. DD/MM/YYYY

ATFM delay report July Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report November Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report February Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report January Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

Managing Low Cost and Legacy Growth at the Same Airport. Vilnius Case

SESAR ANNUAL DEMO WORKSHOP. Toulouse, October 2014 TOPLINK 1 & 2 Daniel MULLER, TOPLINK PM

The flow centric approach :

ELEVENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE. Montreal, 22 September to 3 October 2003

Demand capacity balancing in a dynamic fashion. Sonke Mahlich, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre

EUROCONTROL Low-Cost Carrier Market Update

Monthly Network Operations Report

EU Report. Europe JULY 2018

Traffic Results January June 2010 by Chief Executive Officer Julian Jaeger

Forty years of vision. The EUROCONTROL Maastricht UAC story. years of vision EUROCONTROL MAASTRICHT UAC EUROCONTROL

ECOsystem: MET-ATM integration to improve Aviation efficiency

Monthly Network Operations Report

ANNUAL NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT Main Report Final Edition

European General Aviation Conference Schonhagen Airport. Martin Robinson CEO AOPA UK Deputy Vice President IAOPA Europe Berlin 15 th May 2006

Monthly Network Operations Report

EU Report. Europe SEPTEMBER 2018

De luchtvaart in het EU-emissiehandelssysteem. Summary

EUROCONTROL. Eric MIART Manager - Airport Operations Programme (APR)

XXXXX FACTS AND FIGURES THE ESSENTIALS

2017 Overview and 2018 Outlook

ATFM delay report February Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

Competition for Air Traffic Management: The Air Navigation Service Provider s perspective

Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)

FACTS & FIGURES 2016

Different views on Performance

ATFM delay report April 2018

Half Year Traffic Highlights

Transcription:

PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015-2019 CAPACITY January 2019

Contents Description & Analysis 3 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (en-route) 4 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (arrival) 5 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) 6 KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) 7 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) 8 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) 9 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ACC) 10 KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) 11 KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) 12 Glossary 13 Page: 2

Description & Analysis Europe Traffic in January 2019 increased by 3.0% compared to January 2018 and was in line with the baseline forecast. Four States added more than 50 flights daily to the network with Germany, Spain, Italy and Austria as the top contributors. These four states accounted for 45% of the local traffic in Europe. Germany was the top contributor and added 254 daily flights owing to its dynamic internal flow (+36 flights/day) as well as its flows to and from Spain (+41 flights/day) and Turkey (+27 flights/day) mainly. Spain (excl. Canary Islands) came next and added 234 daily flights partly due to its strong internal flow (+51 flights/day) along with its flows to and from Germany (+41 flights/day), Italy (+25 flights/day), UK (+20 flights/day), Austria (+17 flights/day) and Canary Islands (+13 flights/day). Italy was the third contributor to the network and added 121 daily flights owing to its internal flow (+29 flights/day) and to its flows to and from Spain (+24 flights/day), Germany (+15 flights/day) and UK (+15 flights/day). On the negative side, Sweden saw 32 fewer flights per day owing to its weak internal flow which decreased by 6.3%. The low-cost segment had the fastest growth and recorded an increase of 5.7% (+402 flights/day). The charter segment was up by 5% and was followed by the traditional scheduled segment, which grew by 3.2% and was the main driver of growth with 442 additional flights per day. The All-Cargo and Business Aviation segments declined by 6.5% and by 3.4% respectively. The top five external partners in average daily flights on flows in both directions were the United States (823 flights, up 4.3%), the Russian Federation (729 flights, up 7.1%), the United Arab Emirates (350 flights, up 4%), Egypt (259 flights, up 23.7%) and Qatar (203 flights, up 9.2%). The airlines which added the most flights to the European network on a daily basis compared with January 2018 were Ryanair (+124 flights), easyjet UK (+80 flights), Eurowings (+49 flights), LOT (+45 flights) and Vueling (+42 flights). The average en-route ATFM delay per flight in the NM area in January was 0.36 min/flt, which is above the corresponding monthly guideline value of 0.14 min/flt (Source: NM). FABEC In the FABEC area, traffic increased by 3.9% in January 2019 compared to the same month in 2018. This traffic growth is significantly above the STATFOR baseline scenario published in March 2015. The landings in the FABEC area (only the airports included in the performance plan) recorded an increase by 2.7%. The main contributor to this increase is DFS (+5.8%) whereas skyguide (+1.5%), skeyes (+1.3%), DSNA (+0.8%) and LVNL (+0.1%) contributed as well to this increase, however to a lesser extent. The unit with the highest ATFM en-route delay in January 2019 is Karlsruhe (124 831 min.), where delays were due to 'ATC- Capacity' (59%), 'Staffing' (36%), 'Airspace Management' (3%) and 'Weather' (1%). Reims and Bremen also induced delay in January 2019, but at a lower level; Reims (19 817 min.; 58% due to 'ATC-Capacity' and 42% 'Staffing'); Bremen (11 544 min.; 56% due to 'ATC-Capacity', 19% 'Weather' and 17% 'Airspace Management'). The en-route ATFM delay per flight all causes reached 0.47 min/flt in January 2019 compared to 0.21 min/flt in 2018 (performance drop by 123%). This result is far beyond the guideline value for January (0.12 min/flt). The en-route ATFM delay CRSTMP causes reaches 0.46 min/flt. This corresponds as well to a significant performance drop compared to last year (0.18 min/flt); this value is above the guideline value estimated at the end of January (0.12 min/flt). The Arrival ATFM delay per arrival movement all causes decreased in January from 0.69 min/flt in 2018 to 0.64 min/flt in 2019 (a performance enhancement by 7%). The arrival ATFM delay per arrival flight CRSTMP causes is at the same level as last year (0.02 min/flt at the end of January). The airports with the highest ATFM delay in January 2019 more than 10% of the total FABEC arrival delay were Amsterdam/EHAM (34 287 min.), Paris Orly/LFPO (16 538 min.) and Zurich/LSZH (16 189 min.). In Amsterdam, delays were due to 'Weather' (84%) and 'Aerodrome Capacity' (16%). In Paris Orly, delays were due to 'Weather'(72%), 'Aerodrome capacity' (25%) and 'ATC-Capacity' (3%); in Zurich, 'Weather' (74%), 'Aerodrome Capacity (23%) and 'Environment' (3%). As a very first indication, apart from DFS, the FABEC members are achieving their respective CRSTMP en-route ATFM delay per flight. With respect to the Arrival ATFM delay per arrival flight, all FABEC members are currently achieving their respective CRSTMP target. P.S.: In the context of the post-ops performance adjustment process, delays figures for all ANSPs are not consolidated yet. Page: 3

IFR Flights FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (en-route) FABEC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 YTD 2018 Monthly 419 452 399 761 467 833 505 789 554 363 575 947 612 280 597 957 583 092 564 856 453 639 444 489 419 452 2019 Monthly 435 809 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 435 809 Growth (%) 3.9 % 3.9 % FPP RP2 2019 399 183 380 820 441 248 458 778 506 547 515 400 541 767 524 918 518 262 500 254 419 096 401 552 399 183 2019 / RP2 (%) - Monthly 9.2 % 2019 / RP2 (%) - Cumulated 9.2 % #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 2018 Monthly and 2019 Monthly values represent actual movements (source: PRU). RP2 2019 represents the traffic forecast (STATFOR low- growth 02/2015) underpinning the FABEC Performance Plan, split into monthly values on the basis of a FABEC consolidated methodology. 650 000 600 000 550 000 500 000 450 000 400 000 350 000 435 809 2018 Monthly 2019 Monthly FPP RP2 2019 YTD skeyes 2018 Monthly 44 799 42 925 50 291 54 227 58 645 60 296 63 039 61 022 60 111 58 879 48 221 47 119 44 799 2019 Monthly 46 085 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 46 085 Growth (%) 2.9 % 2.9 % 2018 Monthly 212 646 203 601 238 141 252 738 280 725 287 148 300 814 295 118 291 235 289 102 236 401 225 799 212 646 2019 Monthly 222 009 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 222 009 Growth (%) 4.4 % 4.4 % 2018 Monthly 213 336 202 724 240 485 267 871 293 860 311 779 337 069 325 019 314 605 296 295 226 565 228 286 213 336 2019 Monthly 221 573 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 221 573 Growth (%) 3.9 % 3.9 % 2018 Monthly 46 296 44 327 50 909 53 087 57 154 56 123 58 261 57 756 56 676 57 414 48 678 47 151 46 296 2019 Monthly 46 111 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 46 111 Growth (%) -0.4 % -0.4 % 2018 Monthly 135 713 126 950 147 139 154 380 168 707 168 910 176 472 173 216 168 749 168 395 142 381 141 678 135 713 2019 Monthly 138 773 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 138 773 Growth (%) 2.3 % 2.3 % 2018 Monthly 86 394 82 941 97 689 107 085 117 936 124 702 131 917 128 638 125 622 119 747 90 115 91 030 86 394 2019 Monthly 89 334 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 89 334 DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC skyguide Growth (%) 3.4 % 3.4 % Source: EUROCONTROL - PRU / Performance Plan RP1 Page: 4

IFR ARR Flights FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (arrival) FABEC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 YTD 2018 Monthly 189 660 180 419 209 287 217 664 233 911 237 622 248 909 240 578 242 314 241 201 205 323 198 327 189 660 2019 Monthly 194 850 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 194 850 Growth (%) 2.7 % 2.7 % 2018 Monthly and 2019 Monthly values represent actual arrivals (source: PRU). 2018 Monthly 2019 Monthly 300 000 250 000 200 000 150 000 194 850 2018 Monthly 2019 Monthly Growth (%) YTD ANA LUX 2 788 2 607 3 008 3 249 3 389 3 414 3 313 3 129 3 352 3 366 3 024 2 830 2 788 2 728 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 2 728-2.2 % -2.2 % 2018 Monthly 2019 Monthly Growth (%) skeyes 9 676 9 263 10 646 11 094 11 701 11 711 12 477 12 046 11 860 11 367 10 594 9 826 9 676 9 804 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 9 804 1.3 % 1.3 % 2018 Monthly 2019 Monthly Growth (%) DFS 73 971 72 422 83 650 86 752 94 000 94 769 98 092 97 183 98 506 100 871 86 195 79 756 73 971 78 274 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 78 274 5.8 % 5.8 % 2018 Monthly 2019 Monthly Growth (%) DSNA 66 247 61 688 72 535 76 311 82 339 85 816 91 320 84 966 86 309 82 645 68 991 68 659 66 247 66 766 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 66 766 0.8 % 0.8 % 2018 Monthly 2019 Monthly Growth (%) LVNL 18 970 17 932 20 586 21 404 22 907 22 339 23 347 23 315 22 640 23 022 19 660 19 505 18 970 18 998 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 18 998 0.1 % 0.1 % 2018 Monthly 2019 Monthly Growth (%) skyguide 18 008 16 507 18 862 18 854 19 575 19 573 20 360 19 939 19 647 19 930 16 859 17 751 18 008 18 280 #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV #NV 18 280 1.5 % 1.5 % Page: 5

KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) YTD YTD YTD YTD 2019 2018 2019 2018 En-route Delay All causes 0.47 0.21 En-route Delay CRSTMP causes 0.46 0.18 FABEC Target (yearly value) 0.43 FABEC Target (yearly value) 0.34 Guideline 0.12 Guideline 0.13 Minute ('000) ALL causes 204 88 Minute ('000) CRSTMP causes 199 74 Diff. 2019-2018 + 132.8 % Diff. 2019-2018 + 167 % Traffic ('000) 436 419 Potential savings (*) due to underbid the delay Target Diff. 2019-2018 + 3.9 % (all Causes) in Mio EURO (YTD) * Cost of ATFM-delay per min = 87 3.00 2.50 1.50 0.50 2.60 2.40 2.20 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 0.80 0.60 0.40 Yearly Value (RP 1) All Delay Causes 1.07 1.15 0.81 0.56 0.70 0.48 0.49 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.47 0.26 0.09 0.17 0.21 2018 (All Causes) Guideline (All Causes) 2019 (All Causes) Target (All Causes) Cumulated (YTD) YTD 2.12 FABEC yearly Target 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 1.50 0.50 1.60 1.40 1.20 0.80 0.60 0.40 0,43 0,34 Yearly Value (RP 1) CRSTMP Delay Causes + 0.67 0.76 0.48 0.59 0.46 0.37 0.38 0.31 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.12 0.08 0.17 0.18 2018 (CRSTMP) Guideline (CRSTMP) 2019 (CRSTMP) Target (CRSTMP) Cumulated (YTD) YTD 1.40 FABEC yearly Target 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2018 monthly ADM 2019 monthly ADM 2018 monthly CRSTMP 2019 monthly CRSTMP 5.00 4.00 3.00 Monthly 4.28 4.46 3.75 3.13 1.87 1.40 1.51 0.47 0.92 0.43 0.47 0.87 0.21 3.50 3.00 2.50 1.50 0.50 Monthly 0.85 0.46 0.69 0.18 0.42 3.22 2.49 2.11 1.66 1.45 1.20 0.72 0.45 The guideline for the en-route ATFM delay per movement is a basic cumulative extrapolation of the previous three years monthly allocation and is designed to give an impression, how the YTD figures should be, in order to reach the yearly 2019 published targets (0.43 min per flight for all delay causes and 0.34 min per flight for the delay causes CRSTMP). Page: 6

KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) YTD YTD YTD YTD 2019 2018 2019 2018 Arrival Delay All causes 0.64 0.69 Arrival Delay CRSTMP causes 0.02 0.02 Diff. 2019-2018 - 8 % Diff. 2019-2018 + 59 % Minute ('000) ALL causes 124 132 Minute ('000) CRSTMP causes 5 3 Diff. 2019-2018 - 5 % Diff. 2019-2018 + 63 % Traffic ('000) 195 190 Diff. 2019-2018 + 2.7 % All Delay Causes CRSTMP Delay Causes 1.20 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.73 Yearly Value YTD 1.17 1.01 0.82 0.80 0.85 0.76 0.73 0.69 0.64 0.44 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (RP 1) 0.25 0.15 0.10 0.05 Yearly Value 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 YTD 0.19 0.07 0.02 0.02 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (RP 1) 2018 (All Causes) 2019 (All Causes) Cumulated (YTD) 2018 (CRSTMP) 2019 (CRSTMP) Cumulated (YTD) 0.80 0.64 0.60 0.40 0.10 0.02 1.20 0.80 0.60 0.40 2018 monthly ADM 2019 monthly ADM Monthly 0.99 1.04 0.81 0.82 0.69 0.64 0.65 0.70 0.59 0.59 0.62 0.58 0.62 0.10 2018 monthly CRSTMP 2019 monthly CRSTMP Monthly 0.02 0.02 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.05 0.09 Page: 7

ADM due to reason code ( monthly value) Delay due to reason code min. ( monthly value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) 150 000 C R S T M P W I... C R S T M P W I... 0 Delay due to reason code: 2018 2019 Capacity "C" 28 852 111 710 Routeing "R" 200 12 Staffing "S" 40 831 77 788 Equipment "T" 731 753 Airspace Mgmt. "M" 2 978 8 579 Special event "P" 853 21 Weather "W" 12 532 4 393 0 0 All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 575 571 3 000 000 2 500 000 2 000 000 1 500 000 1 000 000 500 000 0 CRSTMP: TOTAL: Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) 74 445 198 863 87 552 203 827 All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" 2018 2019 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" 2018 2019 Page: 8

( YTD value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) 160 000 140 000 120 000 100 000 80 000 60 000 40 000 20 000 Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 224 246 72 29 Weather "W" 4 196 72 125 Special event "P" 21 Airspace Mgmt. "M" 6 175 2 404 Equipment "T" 753 Staffing "S" 1 328 51 544 18 974 4 538 1 404 Routeing "R" 12 Capacity "C" 83 825 22 057 1 647 2 931 1 250 CRSTMP: 1 328 141 544 41 796 1 647 9 873 2 675 TOTAL: 1 328 145 964 42 114 1 719 9 998 2 704 skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 3.50 3.00 2.50 1.50 0.50 (National) Target All causes Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () 0.09 0.07 0.30 0.23 Weather "W" 0.02 Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" 0.03 0.02 Equipment "T" Staffing "S" 0.03 0.23 0.09 0.03 0.02 Routeing "R" 0.23 Capacity "C" 0.38 0.10 0.04 0.02 0.01 CRSTMP: TOTAL: 0.30 0.16 0.14 (National) Target CRSTMP causes 0.18 0.15 0.03 0.64 0.19 0.04 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.66 0.19 0.04 0.07 0.03 0.18 0.23 Page: 9

Brussels Bremen Karlsruhe Langen Munchen Bordeaux Brest Marseille Paris Reims Amsterdam Maastricht Geneva Zurich ( YTD value) Brussels Bremen Karlsruhe Langen Munchen Bordeaux Brest Marseille Paris Reims Amsterdam Maastricht Geneva Zurich min. ( YTD value) Movements KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ACC) Capacity "C" Routeing "R" Staffing "S" Equipment "T" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Special event "P" Weather "W" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Movements 140 000 120 000 Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) 124 831 2 000 000 1 800 000 1 600 000 100 000 1 400 000 80 000 60 000 1 200 000 1 000 000 800 000 40 000 600 000 20 000 0 1 328 11 544 8 862 727 772 2 298 9 094 4 025 19 817 1 719 9 998 272 2 432 400 000 200 000 Capacity "C" Routeing "R" Staffing "S" Equipment "T" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Special event "P" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Weather "W" 1.60 1.40 Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () 0.91 1.20 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.24 0.28 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.12 0.04 0.02 0.07 0.01 0.04 Page: 10

ADM due to reason code ( monthly value) Delay due to reason code min. ( monthly value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) 100 000 C R S T M P W I... C R S T M P W I... Delay due to reason code: 0 2018 2019 Capacity "C" 2 234 948 Routeing "R" 0 0 Staffing "S" 383 3 677 Equipment "T" 365 236 Airspace Mgmt. "M" 0 0 Special event "P" 0 0 Weather "W" 94 358 98 328 0 0 All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 34 247 21 271 250 000 200 000 150 000 100 000 50 000 0 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 CRSTMP: TOTAL: Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) 2 982 131 587 2018 Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () 2019 4 861 124 460 All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" 2018 2019 Page: 11

( YTD value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) 40 000 35 000 30 000 25 000 20 000 15 000 10 000 5 000 Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) ANA LUX skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 185 4 701 4 882 5 639 5 864 Weather "W" 70 9 210 21 023 25 309 28 648 14 068 Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" 41 195 Staffing "S" 543 2 435 241 458 Routeing "R" Capacity "C" 268 550 130 CRSTMP: 543 2 744 986 588 TOTAL: 70 9 938 28 468 31 177 34 287 20 520 ANA LUX skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 0.02 0.06 0.07 0.30 0.32 Weather "W" 0.03 0.94 0.27 0.38 1.51 0.77 Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" 0.06 0.03 0.03 Routeing "R" 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 1.50 0.50 (National) Target All causes Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () 0.10 (National) Target CRSTMP causes Capacity "C" 0.01 0.01 CRSTMP: TOTAL: 0.03 0.65 0.09 0.60 0.15 In fact Target All causes applies to all 4 airports Target values are dependent on traffic evolution 0.06 0.04 0.01 0.03 1.01 0.36 0.47 1.80 1.12 0.50 2.20 0.43 Page: 12

Glossary KPI #1: KPI #1 is set by IR (EU) 390/2013 and is expressed in minutes per flight. For this indicator, the EU-wide target set for each year of RP2 is 0.50 The targets set at FABEC level are as follows for the indicator 'En-route ATFM delay (all regulation causes) per controlled flight' for 2015: 0,48, 2016: 0.42, 2017: 0.42, 2018: 0.42, 2019: 0.43 The targets set at FABEC level are as follows for the indicator 'En-route ATFM delay (CRSTMP regulation causes) per controlled flight' for 2015: 0.37, 2016: 0.33, 2017: 0.33, 2018: 0.33, 2019: 0.34 KPI #2: KPI #2 is set by IR (EU) 390/2013 and is expressed in minutes per flight. For this indicator, no targets have been defined at EU and FABEC level for RP2. The targets have been set at local level. Cause ATC Capacity CODE Guidelines for Application En Route: Demand exceeds or complexity reduces declared or expected ATC capacity Airport: Demand exceeds declared or expected ATC capacity. ATC Industrial Action I Reduction in any capacity due to industrial action by ATC staff ATC Routeings R Network solutions / scenarios used to balance demand and capacity ATC Staffing S Unplanned staff shortage reducing expected capacity. ATC Equipment T Reduction of expected or declared capacity due to the non-availability or degradation of equipment used to provide an ATC service. Accident / Incident Aerodrome Capacity A G Reduction of expected ATC capacity due to an aircraft accident / incident. Reduction in declared or expected capacity due to the degradation or non-availability of infrastructure at an airport. e.g. Work in Progress, shortage of aircraft stands etc. Or when demand exceeds expected aerodrome capacity. Reduced capacity due to the degradation or non-availability of support equipment at an Equipment NON ATC- to be E airport e.g. Fire Service, De-icing / snow removal equipment or other ground handling Aerodrome Services equipment. Industrial Action NON ATC N A reduction in expected / planned capacity due to industrial action by non ATC personnel. Airspace Management Special Event Weather Environmental Issues Other C M P W V O Reduction in declared or expected capacity following changes in airspace / route availability due to small scale military activity. Reduction in planned, declared or expected capacity or when demand exceeds the above capacities as a result of a major sporting, governmental or social event. It may also be used for ATM system upgrades and transitions. Large multinational military exercises may also use this reason. This category should only be used with prior approval during the planning process. Reduction in expected capacity due to any weather phenomena. This includes where weather impacts airport infrastructure capacity, but where aerodrome services are operating as planned / expected. Reduction in any capacity or when demand exceeds any capacity due to agreed local noise, runway usage or similar procedures. This category should only be used with prior agreement in the planning process. This should only be used in exceptional circumstances when no other category is sufficient. An explanatory ANM remark MUST be given to allow post ops analysis. CRSTMP: ATC Capacity (C), ATC Routeings (R), ATC Staffing (S), ATC Equipment (T), Airspace Management (M), Special Event (P); a set of regulation codes which are defined in the Common Charging Scheme Regulation (IR 391/2013) and subject to financial incentive. Note: Arrival figures (traffic and delay) do only include EBBR and EBLG for Belgium and only EHAM for the Netherlands. TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ADM - Average en-route per Movement ATM - Air Traffic Management ANSP - Air Navigation Service Provider PRU - Performance Review Unit ATFM - Air Traffic Flow Management YTD - Year to Date value ANM - Aeronautical Notification Message FPP - FABEC Performace Plan FABEC - Functional Airspace Block Europe Central Page: 13

FABEC Performance Report Capacity: Editor: Sources: Status: January 2019 www.fabec.eu FABEC PMG EUROCONTROL PRU, FABEC ANSPs Notice The FABEC PMG has made every effort to ensure that the information and analysis contained in this document are as accurate and complete as possible. Only information from quoted sources has been used and information relating to named parties has been checked with the parties concerned. Despite these precautions, should you find any errors or inconsistencies we would be grateful if you could please bring them to the FABEC PMGs attention. Page: 14