COSCAP-NA Programme Progress Report Discussion Paper

COSCAP-NA Programme Progress Report Discussion Paper 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to outline the progress made to achieve programme objectives as stated in the COSCAP-NA Programme Document and other additional objectives approved at the 1 st through 10 th Steering Committee Meetings. 2 Background 2.1 1 st Steering Committee At the 1 st Steering Committee Meeting conducted in Beijing, China on the 8 th and 9 th of April 2003, the priorities for the programme were established and at subsequent meetings priorities were reviewed and amended as required. The assignment of priorities was based on the following criteria: i. High - Work to achieve the objectives will be continuous. ii. iii. Medium - Work to achieve the objectives will be carried out as time permits. Low - Little or no work will be carried out to achieve the objectives. After review of this report decisions may be made whether priorities require further amendment. Notes 1. CTA comments on the objectives/outputs are in bold italics. 2. Summary of Course and Seminar Participation to date is provided in Appendix A. 3. Detailed Course participation information is provided in Appendix B 4. Detailed Mission information is provided in Appendix C 3 Discussion of IMMEDIATE OBJECTIVES and OUTPUTS 3.1 Immediate Objective 1 Ensuring that safety oversight capabilities of Member Administrations meet international requirements and that all deficiencies identified by the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight (USOAP) Audit Reports have been fully corrected. Output 1.1 Action Plans, where needed, for correcting outstanding deficiencies, are prepared and implemented as appropriate. Steering Committee Priority High Corrective Action Plans to respond to USOAP audits related to Annex 1, 6 and 8, including follow up audits, have to a large extent been fully implemented by Member file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 1

States. For some States, CTA/AWE have assisted in providing guidance with some of the outstanding items during regular missions to States. An Aerodrome Certification and Safety Training Expert (ACSTE) and Air Traffic Service Consultant were engaged for short periods of time to assist States preparations for the ICAO USOAP audits related to Annex 11 and 14. In addition, COSCAP-NA ATM Experts have been engaged to assist States with the implementation of their ATM Safety Management Programme. A USOAP Seminar was provided in Beijing, China, during the period of 12 15 December 2007 by the ICAO USOAP Office. The programme was attended by over 140 participants from 13 States/Administrations. The USOAP audit was conducted on China during March/April 2007. ATM and Aerodrome Experts were engaged by ROK to assist with their USOAP preparations. The Aerodrome Expert was also engaged for a one week mission to DPRK through the use of IFFAS funds. ROK and DPRK had their USOAP audit conducted in May 2008 and considerable support was provided to them to assist their efforts, with follow up support in the DPRK provided in 2009 and 2010. Mongolia completed its USOAP audit in July 2010. Numerous missions to Mongolia to support the CAAM Project Team complete their preparations for the audit were conducted by COSCAP-NA staff, plus experts in Aerodromes, Operations and ANS from COSCAP-SEA, the Republic of Korea and the Civil Aviation Department of Hong Kong. The main activity of the CTA, which until 2010 had been working with Member States to assist the review on implementation of SARPs in preparation of USOAP audits, has shifted to implementation of corrective action plans, and supporting the implementation of SMS and the new ICAO standards for a State Safety Programme (SSP). In support of the implementation of the Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) and the ICAO SSP, in 2009 and 2010 the Asian Region COSCAPs through the ARAST undertook a systematic review of the best practices in the first 5 focus areas and identified specific actions. This concluded that the implementation of the SSP will fully address the best practices of the GASP. At the 4 th ARAST (February 2011) members proposed that COSCAP SSP support efforts focus on ICAO SSP elements 1.4 Enforcement Policy, 2.2 Agreement on Service Provider Performance, 3.1 Oversight and 3.2 Safety Data Collection, Analysis and Exchange. The Asia Region COSCAPs, with support from the BEA, AIB Australia, AIB Republic of Korea, NTSB, AIB Singapore and ICAO, developed model regulations, model procedures and associated training to support Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation within States having limited aviation activity. This area has been a frequent USOAP finding and DGCA/45 action item 45/8 requested the ICAO Technical Cooperation Bureau for support in this area. file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 2

The FAA generously supported the Asian COSCAPs with the assignment of an aerodrome expert to the COSCAP-SEA programme in Bangkok for 2 full time periods of 6 months over 2009 2010. In support of Mongolia this enabled 2 missions in 2009 and 1 in 2010. The Asia Region COSCAPs, with support from the FAA, the CASA Australia, the CAD Hong Kong SAR, the Singapore CAA and ICAO developed model regulations, model procedures and associated training to support the implementation Performance Based Navigation (PBN). With the generous support of Boeing, COSCAP delivered 6 courses in 2010, including one in China, with another planned for 15 to 19 August 2011 at the ICAO Regional Office. In addition, in cooperation with the ICAO Flight Procedures Programme Office (FPP) 7 implementation workshops have been conducted with 6 additional workshops planned for 2011 including the Republic of Korea and Hong Kong SAR. 3.2 Immediate Objective 2 Establishing a dedicated forum for coordination and cooperation among the Civil Aviation Administrations of Member States, with the aim of harmonization of regulations, policies and procedures related to safety oversight, improving safety standards, and applying accident prevention measures. Output 2.1 The Steering Committee of the COSCAP-NA project, formally established by the project, will have become the forum for flight safety in North Asian countries. Steering Committee Priority LOW except for Foreign Air Operator Regulation - HIGH Major initiatives towards harmonization of regulations were assigned a LOW priority at the 1 st SC Meeting. However, to assist the development of a harmonization mechanism within COSCAP-NA, harmonization of Foreign Air Operator Regulation (technical draft) was undertaken by COSCAP-NA as a trial and assigned a HIGH Priority. At the 2 nd COSCAP-NA SC Meeting approval in principle was provided to the Foreign Air Operator Regulation and Manual of Foreign Air Operator Regulation and Surveillance. These documents were forwarded to Member States on 24 December 2003. COSCAP-NA developed a training programme for the surveillance of foreign air operators which has been provided to some Member States during regular missions. As a result of the DGCA Conference in March 2006, ICAO established a Working Group to examine Foreign Air Operator regulation and certification in an effort to harmonize requirements on a global basis. COSCAP-NA provided a Foreign Air Operator Inspector On-Job-Training programme to CAAC staff in June, September and December of 2007, and March 2008, utilizing draft material prepared by the ICAO Working Group. To support State implementation of Annex revisions related to Foreign Air Operator validation and surveillance, the Asia Region COSCAPs, with support from ICAO, the FAA and EASA, have developed model regulations, a model procedures manual and file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 3

Output 2.2 associated training course. This material was refined at a workshop in February 2009 involving the COSCAPs, Australia, ICAO, FAA and EASA and experienced Inspectors from a number of States. The pilot course was delivered at the ICAO Regional office 2 & 3 June 2009, and the CTA delivered another in Mongolia 6 & 7 October 2009. One day workshops were held in Beijing 3 September 2009, Changde 3 June 2010, and Seoul 24 December 2010. COSCAP-NA will provide further courses, workshops and support in Member States on request. A North Asia Regional Aviation Safety Team (NARAST), as proposed by the ICAO Assembly in 1998, for recommending accident prevention interventions in the Member Countries, is established under the project. Steering Committee Priority High Following decisions of the 8 th Steering Committee Meeting, the NARAST evolved during 2008 to form the combined Asian Regional Aviation Safety Team (ARAST). Eleven meetings of NARAST have now been completed, plus 4 of the combined ARAST and implementation of recommendations is ongoing once these are approved by the Steering Committee. The results of these meetings will be reviewed in detail under DP3 Safety Team Reports and Proposed Actions. In addition, DP3 includes a detailed report on the Implementation Status of NARAST action items. 3.3 Immediate Objective 3 Establishment of a systematic programme for inspection of air operators and maintenance organizations in Member States whose Civil Aviation Administrations currently lack the capability to do so independently. Output 3.1 Systematic surveillance, inspection and certification capability of air operators and maintenance organizations established in Member Administrations that lacked hitherto such capability. Steering Committee Priority High Member States needs in this area vary considerably. During regular missions to States, experts provide required guidance material that is available from the material developed by the COSCAP programme. The 2 nd COSCAP-NA Steering Committee Meeting established the process for On-Job-Training (OJT) that could be provided at the request of Member States. COSCAP-NA developed a draft policy for conducting OJT to Member States which was discussed with them during missions and a draft policy was forwarded to Member States in late 2004. In States where most of the classroom training has been completed, a programme of OJT has been established based on needs. During the programme, specialist and joint inspections of air operators have been conducted to permit best practices exchange between COSCAP-NA and National Inspectors. Due to the priority of preparing for USOAP audits limited OJT is being provided at this time. file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 4

3.4 Immediate Objective 4 Safety oversight inspectors and technical personnel in North Asian Member States are qualified and sufficient for undertaking surveillance, inspection, testing, certification and regulation of flight operations, airworthiness and personnel licensing through recruitment and training. Output 4.1 The required number of safety oversight inspectors and technical personnel in the Civil Aviation Administrations of Member States are recruited, trained and qualified to undertake fully the tasks required of them. Steering Committee Priority High At the 1 st COSCAP-NA Steering Committee Meeting a programme of required training was approved by the Steering Committee. Based on the needs of each Member State, COSCAP-NA has conducted specific training as outlined in Appendix A. The CTA/RAI provided a Foreign Air Operator Surveillance OJT programme to the CAAC in June, September and December of 2007, and March 2008. CTA provided the ICAO SMS Course in Mongolia also in June 2007, an Aviation English Instructor course was provided in Beijing in February 2008, and a Cabin Safety Course was held in Beijing in April 2008. Partner organizations continue to provide training in support of the COSCAP programme. Transport Canada provided a Dangerous Good Safety Oversight Course in China, Mongolia and Bangkok Thailand. Boeing assisted the CTA to deliver a Designated Check Pilot course in Mongolia in 2007, two in China in 2009 and one in Mongolia in 2010. The NATS United Kingdom provided an ATM SMS Implementation Seminar in Bangkok, Thailand with the support of the COSCAP programmes. ENAC sponsored PBN training in Beijing in December 2007, Flight Safety Foundation and AAPA provided a Ground Accident Prevention Seminar in Beijing in March 2008. Between May 2008 and February 2009 the EC Joint Research Commission and the BEA jointly provided ECCAIRS training in Bangkok, Boeing supported a Ground Icing Course in Mongolia and delivered a Flight Operations Symposium in both Beijing and Bangkok, and EASA provided a SAFA workshop in Bangkok. Several Human Factors and Crew Resource Management training were provided for COSCAP-NA members in 2010 (Bangkok, Seoul and Pyongyang). As of April 2011 a total of 4465 candidates have participated in 162 Courses, Workshops and Seminars under the COSCAP-NA programme. Other training programmes will be organized to meet the needs of Member States as required. Since the last Steering Committee Meeting, 23 workshops and courses have been provided for Member States, attended 384 participants. For a complete listing of programmes see Appendices A and B. See Appendix D for a summary of Member Feedback on courses. file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 5

3.5 Immediate Objective 5 (Phase I) Establishment of aerodrome certification capability and related management system in Member States. Output 5.1 Output 5.2 Harmonized aerodrome certification regulations and procedures will have been developed and adopted by the Member States. The capability and effectiveness of regulatory authorities and airport operators in airport safety will have been enhanced by the development of Aerodrome Manuals and establishment of Safety Management Systems. Steering Committee Priority HIGH An Aerodrome Certification Safety and Training Expert (ACSTE) was engaged for a four month period commencing on 15 July 2003. ACSTE during missions to States conducted or assisted States with training, including On-Job-Training, of Aerodrome Safety Inspectors. In States he provided or reviewed aviation legislation requirements for certification, provided Model Regulations, produced State-specific aerodrome standards, produced a Manual of Aerodrome Certification Procedures for guidance of regulatory staff and provided Generic Aerodrome Manual for adoption by aerodrome operators. ICAO provided an Aerodrome Safety Workshop in February 2006 for Member States. Additional short term assistance was provided to ROK and DPRK in April 2007 to assist with their USOAP Preparations, and CAAC also directly supported DPRK preparations in the area of Aerodrome Safety oversight. The Regional Aerodrome Expert from COSCAP-SA provided support to the DPRK 13 to 17 December 2010. 3.6 Immediate Objective 5 (Phase II) Member States have established effective Safety Management Systems in the area of Aircraft Operations, Aerodromes and Air Traffic Management. Output 5.1 (Phase II) Regulations, standards and guidance material will have been developed by Member States to implement ICAO SARPs requiring air operators and service providers to implement Safety Management Systems. Output 5.2 (Phase II) Training programmes, seminars and evaluations are conducted to assist CAAs, air operators and service providers with the implementation of Safety Management Systems. Steering Committee Priority HIGH Numerous training and SMS support activities have been delivered for the support of Member States during Phase I of the programme. Demand for support to Member States for the implementation of safety management systems as part of a State Safety file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 6

Programme is increasing, with the focus shifting from concepts and foundation training to implementation strategy and oversight programme development. During 2008 the CTA, while on mission to Mongolia and the DPRK, undertook discussions with CAA and service provider personnel to support SMS implementation. COSCAP-NA provided varied SMS support to the CAAC, KOCA, CAAM and GACA in 2009 2010, and is prepared to provide specific support to assess the implementation and effectiveness of SMS in 2010 2011. The Asia Region COSCAPs, with the kind cooperation of the Republic of Korea delivered an Operator SMS Implementation as in conjunction with the ROK / FAA 3 rd Flight Safety Seminar, held 31 May to 2 in Seoul. In December 2010 a trial assessment of an air operator safety management system (SMS)was conducted by COSCAP with the cooperation of a volunteer CAA and a volunteer air operator and the kind support of SMS experts from the Airbus, AAPA, Boeing, IATA, SR Technics, CAA China, CAA Singapore, Korean Air Lines and the State of the Operator. The trial assessment protocol will be revised and used in a second trial and thereafter made available to Members as guidance for the refinement of their own safety oversight programmes intended to assess the effectiveness of SMS. The assessment method was reviewed with the Civil Aviation Office of Korea in March 2011 as part of the review of the ROK oversight system to take SMS into account. 4 Air Traffic Services At the 1 st COSCAP North Asia Steering Committee Meeting Member States strongly supported a role for COSCAP-NA to assist States with their preparations for USOAP audit of Annex 11 Air Traffic Services and related guidance material (subject to the availability of funding). Steering Committee Priority HIGH The Boeing Company kindly released sufficient funds to support the engagement of an Air Traffic Services Certification Expert for an initial period of six weeks. During this period he reviewed with Member States their compliance with Annex 11 SARPs and provided assistance to them concerning implementation of ICAO SARPs. Based on a decision of the 3 rd Steering Committee Meeting, COSCAP-NA with funding support from Airbus and Boeing engaged ATM Safety Experts to cooperate with States in the establishment of their ATM Safety Management programmes. In March 2007 and February 2008 ROK engaged an ATM expert to assist with their preparations for the USOAP audit. The ICAO Regional Officer ATM provided a workshop to Mongolia 10 to 12 November 2008 to support their radar implementation project. The 9 th COSCAP-NA Steering Committee meeting extended the programme to include ANS, and during 16 to 20 November 2009, the ICAO Air Traffic Management expert reviewed preparations for the transition to RADAR surveillance in Mongolia. file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 7

The CTA is discussing with COSCAP-NA members their priorities in this area and subject to the availability of expertise and funding will make the necessary arrangements in cooperation with the ICAO Regional Office. In response to member requests, the CTA will seek support for CNS, including cartography for the DPRK, provide RVSM implementation assistance to Mongolia, and facilitate the provision of a workshop on the Global ATM Concept for the ROK. 5 Action of the Meeting The Steering Committee is invited to: 5.1 Comment on the nature of the work completed 5.2 Confirm or revise programme priorities file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 8

APPENDIX A YEAR CHINA ROK MONGOLIA DPRK TOTAL CAA: 2300 CAA IND CAA IND CAA IND CAA IND CAA IND IND: 2165 2003 29 127 24 13 34 40 20 6 107 186 TOTAL: 4465 2004 219 107 105 66 44 121 68 42 436 336 2005 213 333 73 103 26 63 25 9 337 508 2006 211 146 32 15 62 59 41 22 346 242 2007 128 109 30 4 26 54 0 0 184 167 2008 247 262 1 4 28 30 23 18 299 314 2009 123 97 50 93 53 55 92 46 318 291 2010 89 2 33 34 36 20 46 23 204 79 2011 5 38 26 9 3 40 41 TOTAL 1268 1221 371 332 337 443 324 169 2300 2165 NOTE: 1. COSCAP Staff not included in total 2. All Courses/Seminars/Workshops included up to April 2011 file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 9

2010 (after 10 th Steering Committee Meeting April 2010) APPENDIX B S.No COURSE LOCATION DATE 1 Designated Medical Examiner Course CHINA ROK MONGOLIA DPRK CAA IND CAA IND CAA IND CAA IND UB, Mongolia 19-22 April 2010 1 2 19 4 2 TOTAL 28 2 3 4 5 6 7 PBN Operational Approval Singapore 26-30 April 2010 2 2 Designated Check Pilot Course UB, Mongolia 18-19 May 2010 5 10 SMS Training Course Seoul, ROK 24-27 May 2010 16 17 Foreign Air Operator Training Course Dangerous Goods Training Course PEL Training Course Part I & II Changde, China 3 June 2010 41 UB, Mongolia 7-11 June 2010 3 6 UB, Mongolia 21 May & 11-12 June 2010 9 4 15 33 41 9 9 8 FAO Validation and Surveillance Course Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 29 June -1 July 10 2 2 9 AERODROME INSPECTORS TRAINING COURSE Colombo, Sri Lanka, 12 16 July 2010 1 2 2 5 10 LINE OPERATIONAL SIMULATION COURSE Pyongyang, DPRK 01-Jul-10 5 6 11 11 Designated Check Pilot Course Pyongyang, DPRK 01-Jul-10 7 4 file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 10 11

APPENDIX B S.No COURSE LOCATION DATE CHINA ROK MONGOLIA DPRK TOTAL 12 PBN Operational Approval Course Guanghan, China 6-10 September 2010 23 23 13 RNP AR Operational Approval Course Guanghan, China 13-16 September 2010 22 1 23 14 SMS ATO Course Seoul, ROK 6-10 September 2010 16 13 29 15 Maintenance Sub-contracting Course Pyongyang, DPRK 29 September - 1 Oct 2010 4 6 10 16 Maintenance Record Keeping Course Pyongyang, DPRK 20 October 2010 4 7 11 17 All Weather Operations Training Course Pyongyang, DPRK 3-4 November 2010 12 12 18 PBN Operational Approval Familiarization Workshop Pyongyang, DPRK 05-Nov-10 12 12 19 Foreign Air Operator Approval Workshop Seoul, ROK 24-Dec-10 15 15 TOTAL: 89 2 33 34 36 20 46 23 303 file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 11

APPENDIX B 2011 (As of April 2011) S.No COURSE LOCATION DATE 1 2 3 CHINA ROK MONGOLIA DPRK CAA IND CAA IND CAA IND CAA IND SSP course UB, Mongolia 1-3 March 26 26 Aircraft import and leasing requirements Course Maintenance Program Certification and Implementation Seminar Pyongyang, DPRK 16-18 March 2011 6 3 9 Beijing, China 21-22 April 2011 5 38 3 46 TOTAL TOTAL: 5 38 0 0 26 0 9 3 81 file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 12

APPENDIX C Results Reporting Summary 1 China May 2010 to April 2011 1.1 2 4 June 2010 CTA and RAI provided Foreign Air Operator Training to Southern & Central Regional Administration of CAAC in Changde, China. 1.2 5 11 September 2010 Capt. Bob Kennedy, PBN expert, and Sun Qun organized and provided PBN and RNP training course in Guanghan, China 1.3 28 October 2010 CTA met with Aviation Safety Office of CAAC, sought CAAC requests regarding SSP and SMS implementation assistance, and provided briefing on COSCAP work to develop a method to assess the effectiveness of safety management systems. (CAAC participated in trial assessment of a Thailand airline.) 1.4 14 17 November 2010 CTA and RAI provided SSP Training in Macau SAR (Note: in return, COSCAP-SEA will provide support for COSCAP-NA) 1.5 18 19 November 2010 CTA and RAI provided SSP Implementation workshop in Hong Kong SAR (Note: in return, COSCAP-SEA will provide support for COSCAP-NA) 2 Democratic People s Republic of Korea 2.1 July 2010 RAI coordinated visit of GACA Airworthiness personnel to Air China and AMECO for September 2010 2.2 10 17 July 2010 CTA delivered an Introduction to Line Operational Simulation, a Designated Check Pilot Course, and provided support for personnel licensing and safety documents management. 2.3 1 3 September 2010 RAI participated in a visit of GACA Airworthiness personnel to Air China and AMECO 2.4 29 September 1 Oct 2010 RAI delivered training to GACA and Air Koryo personnel on Maintenance Sub-contracting 2.5 20-22 October 2010 RAI delivered training to GACA and Air Koryo personnel on Maintenance Record Keeping 2.6 3 5 November 10 Capt. Cormier, CTA COSCAP South East Asia, supported GACA with All Weather Operations Training Course, review of procedures to approve operations specifications, and a PBN Operational Approval Familiarization workshop. 2.7 23 27 Nov 2010 CTA provided support for the implementation of the DPRK State Safety Programme and safety management systems. 2.8 11 19 December 2010 Dr. Punya Shakya, Aerodrome Expert COSCAP South Asia, file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 13

APPENDIX C provided support to the GACA for its aerodrome certification and inspection programme. 2.9 15 19 March 2011 RAI provided training on Aircraft Import and Lease to the GACA and Air Koryo. 3 Mongolia 3.1 17 23 April 2010 Dr. Jarnail Singh conducted Designated Medical Examiner Course (interrupted due to volcanic activity in Europe and inability of other Instructors to attend. To be completed in 2011.) 3.2 26 30 April 2010 RAI supported USOAP preparations, including a pre-audit of the Airworthiness protocols 3.3 17 21 May 2010 CTA, Capt. Len Cormier (CTA, COSCAP-SEA and Capt. Robert Johnson (Senior Training Pilot, Boeing) provided Designated Check Pilot Course, Personnel Licensing Course and support for USOAP preparations 3.4 6 11 June 2010 Daniel Sylvestre (Dangerous Goods expert, Transport Canada) provided Dangerous Goods training course 3.5 23 June 8 July 2010 CTA provided support to Mongolia during USOAP audit 3.6 28 February 4 March 2011 CTA provided the ICAO State Safety Programme (SSP) course, and consulted on support for the implementation of RVSM and PBN. 4 Republic of Korea 4.1 4 7 May 2010 CTA was invited as speaker to Conference on International Air Transportation Cooperation in Seoul, ROK 4.2 23 28 May 2010 CTA provided a Safety Management Systems Course 4.3 5 11 September 2010 CTA and Capt. Doiron, SMS expert, provided Safety Management Systems for Approved Training Organizations course. 4.4 26 27 Oct 2010 CTA presented on Safety Management and Human Factors at the 16 th Aviation Safety and Human Factors Conference, Seoul. 4.5 19 23 Dec 2010 CTA provided support for State Safety Programme (SSP) Implementation and to assist the development of the foreign air operator approval and surveillance programme. 4.6 11 13 April 2011 CTA provided support for the assessment of service provider SMS and an introduction to the role of Culture in safety management. 5 Other Missions 5.1 16 22 May 2010 RAI attended the ICAO/ASPA Regional Seminar on Safety Implications of Fatigue Risk Management Systems (FRMS) and ICAO State Safety file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 14

APPENDIX C Programme Instructor Training in Mexico City, Mexico 5.2 13 24 June 2010 RAI participated in the ICAO USOAP to Japan as Airworthiness auditor in Tokyo, Japan 5.3 28 June 2 July 2010 RAI delivered the Foreign Air Operator Course with COSCAP-SEA CTA in Malaysia (Note: in return, COSCAP-SEA will provide support for COSCAP-NA) 5.4 17 24 July 2010 RAI participated in Airworthiness Inspectors Introductory Course in Bangkok, Thailand to introduce the course to the North Asia region 5.5 5 10 September 2010 RAI delivered SSP training in Singapore to complete on-the-job training to qualify as an ICAO SSP instructor. 5.6 13 16 September CTA provided Audit Procedures training to inspectors of Sri Lanka CAA and SMS familiarization to Sri Lanka air operators (Note: in return, COSCAP-SA will provide support for COSCAP-NA). 5.7 19 24 September 2010 CTA provided SSP Training to CAA of Vietnam (Note: in return, COSCAP-SEA will provide support for COSCAP-NA) 5.8 13 18 September 2010 RAI provided Assistance on the follow up action after USOAP in Cambodia (Note: in return, COSCAP-SEA will provide support for COSCAP-NA) 5.9 11 15 October 2010 CTA provided SSP Training in Japan 5.10 29 October 11 November 2010 CTA provided support and attended COSCAP PBN Operational Approval Course in Thailand 5.11 1 11 November 2010 RAI conducted USOAP audit in Iran 5.12 29 November 4 December 2010 CTA participated in COSCAP-SEA Steering Committee and provided SSP and USOAP presentations 5.13 12 18 December 2010 CTA and RAI conducted SMS trial assessment under ARAST in Thailand. 5.14 26 28 January 2011 CTA provided SSP Training to Dept. of Civil Aviation Thailand (Note: in return, COSCAP-SEA will provide support for COSCAP-NA) 5.15 21 25 February 2011 RAI, CTA and Administrative Officer conducted the 4 th ARAST meeting in Bangkok, Thailand. 5.16 5 & 6 April 2011 COSCAP organized regional ICAO Fatigue Risk Management Seminar in Bangkok, Thailand 5.17 25 29 April 2011 RAI provided Assistance on the follow up action after USOAP in Cambodia (Note: in return, COSCAP-SEA will provide support for COSCAP-NA) file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 15

APPENDIX D COSCAP-NA Results Report Form 1. Programme Venue: Summary 2010 4. Comments on the quality of the The quality of the programme was very good. programme and recommendations The quality of the programme was high. We learned much from the programme for improvement. The quality of the programme was high. We would like to recommend much exercise or drill for involvement of the programme. The training schedule is very good, and the instructor did an excellent job. We suggest that the courseware 5. If applicable, did the programme meet your training and/or information needs? 6. As a result of this programme, what course of action may the CAA take to amend your requirements (if required). 7. For the items identified in 6., above, or if you feel that additional training or information is required, kindly identify what additional support (if any) that you feel COSCAP/donors could provide. should be adjusted to cover more details, so trainees didn t have to take so many notes. The programme met our training and information needs. The programme met our needs to some extent. For our information, we needed more detailed examples about regulations and procedures related to Russian aircraft import and leasing in some other states with the current situation similar to our state which is not a design or manufacture state and whose aviation industry is not of a large scale. Yes. The training was organized very well, trainees had got a lot of useful information which would benefit airlines and regional authorities. [State] is planning to review and amend some requirements from relative documents including the Aircraft Operations Standards Manual, if necessary. [State] is planning to review and amend some requirements from relative documents including the Airworthiness Standards Manual. [State] is planning to review and amend some requirements from relative documents including the SMS Manual of Air Koryo. The [State] has reviewed and amended some requirements from the Aerodrome Standards Manual against ICAO standards. We are planning to detail the [State] requirements more specifically. Including more examples about operational approval. [State] will require air operators to collect opinions, if any, and notify later to COSCAP-NA We need additional training or guidance regarding some relative procedures and potential problems in the event that the airport operation is suspended due to some reasons. In addition to the information identified in 5, we need more samples for relative regulations and procedures regarding the airworthiness of such state whose level of aviation industry is similar to our State to support our preparations for the lease and import of aircraft. PBN Procedure design and application package. file: \\sc11_dp2 programme progress report vf.doc 16