Performance Review Report

Annexes to the Performance Review Report PRR 4 Year 2000 An Assessment of Air Traffic Management in Europe during the Calendar Year 2000 Performance Review Commission April 2001

COPYRIGHT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) This document is published by the Performance Review Commission in the interest of the exchange of information. It may be copied in whole or in part providing that the copyright notice and disclaimer are included. The information contained in this document may not be modified without prior written mission the Performance Review Commission. EUROCONTROL The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of EUROCONTROL, which makes no warranty, either implied or express, for the information contained in this document, neither does it assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of this information. Printed by EUROCONTROL, 96, rue de la Fusée, B-1130 Brussels, Belgium, Tel: + 32 2 729 3956, Fax: + 32 2 729 9108.

LIST OF ANNEXES These Annexes should be read in conjunction with Volume I of the Performance Review Commission s Fourth Performance Review Report (PRR 4) 1 SAFETY DEFINITIONS A-1 2 TOP 20 BOTTLENECKS (ATFM EN-ROUTE DELAYS) A-4 3 ATFM DATA A-6 4 EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY MAPS (EUROPEAN REGIONS) A-16 5 EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY MAPS (ACC) A-17 6 COST TABLES A-18 7 TOP 30 CAPACITY CONSTRAINED AIRPORTS A-20 8 FOLLOW-UP TO PRC RECOMMENDATIONS A-21 9 AIR NAVIGATION SERVICE PROVIDERS (2000) A-28

ANNEX 1: SAFETY DEFINITIONS 1. Introduction In an attempt to compare safety formance based on safety data available in US and in Europe, the PRC has identified a wide variety of definitions referring to safety occurrences. It must be emphasised, however, that it is impossible to compare on equal grounds the two systems at this stage, and that there is a need to have harmonised definitions within an ICAO global agreement. This annex summarises the main definitions for incidents that have been used by ICAO, EUROCONTROL Member States, the EUROCONTROL Agency and by the FAA. 2. General Incident: [ICAO Annex 13]: An occurrence, other than an accident, associated with the oation of an aircraft, which affects or could affect the safety of oation. Serious Incident: [ICAO Annex 13]: An incident involving circumstances indicating that an accident nearly occurred. Airprox: [ICAO Doc 4444]: The code word used in an air traffic incident report to designate aircraft proximity. Air proximity: [ICAO Doc 4444]: A situation in which, in the opinion of a pilot or an air traffic services sonnel, the distance between aircraft as well as their relative positions and speed have been such that the safety of the aircraft involved may have been compromised (Four levels of severity are mentioned). More details, examples and a methodology for classification and reporting can be found in the ICAO Doc. 9156 Accident/Incident Reporting Manual. 3. Definitions for Separation Minima Infringements EUROCONTROL Definitions Separation Minima Infringement (EUROCONTROL - ESARR2): A situation in which prescribed separation minima 1 were not maintained between aircraft. Inadequate Separation (EUROCONTROL - ESARR2): In the absence of prescribed separation minima, a situation in which aircraft were ceived to pass too close to each other for pilots to ensure safe separation. The Severity Classification Scheme for Safety Occurrences in ATM is a guidance material document to be applied to the Safety Measurement of ATM and supports the implementation of ESARR 2. It allows the classification of occurrences according to the severity of their effect on the safe oations of aircraft and occupants and it is compatible with ICAO ADREP, mapping each severity category of ICAO into an ESARR 2 category. All documentation relating to ESARR work is available the Safety Regulation Commission s web site at http://www.eurocontrol.be/src/index.html. 1 Set out in ICAO Doc 4444 PANS-RAC, national regulations and LoAs. PRR 4 ANNEXES

US Definitions Oational Error (OE), [Definition and reporting procedures in FAA Order 7210.56A, Air traffic quality assurance ]: An occurrence attributable to an element of the air traffic control system which results in less than the applicable separation minima between two or more aircraft, or between an aircraft and terrain or obstacles as required by Handbook 2 7110.65 and supplemental instructions. Obstacles include vehicles/equipment/sonnel on runways, or aircraft lands or departs on a runway closed to aircraft oations after receiving air traffic authorisation. Near Mid-Air Collision (NMAC) [Definition and reporting procedures in FAA Order 8020.11, Aircraft Accident and Incident Notification, Investigation and Reporting ]: An incident associated with the oation of an aircraft in which the possibility of a collision occurs as a result of proximity of less than 500 feet to another aircraft, or a report is received a pilot or crew member stating that a collision hazard existed between two or more aircraft. Degree of Hazard (NMAC): Critical: A situation in which collision avoidance was due to chance rather than an act on the part of the pilot. Less than 100 feet of aircraft separation would be considered critical. Potential: An incident which would probably have resulted in a collision if no action had been taken by either pilot. Closest proximity of less than 500 feet would usually be required in this case. No hazard: A situation in which direction and altitude would have made a mid-air collision improbable regardless of evasive action taken. Oational Deviation (OD) [Definition and reporting procedures in FAA Order 7210.56A, Air traffic quality assurance ]: An occurrence where applicable separation minima, as referenced in the oational error definition below were maintained, but: (1) less than the applicable separation minima existed between an aircraft and protected airspace without prior approval, (2) an aircraft penetrated airspace that was delegated to another position of oation or another facility without prior co-ordination and approval, (3) an aircraft penetrated airspace that was delegated to another position of oation of another facility at an altitude or route contrary to the altitude or route requested and approved in direct co-ordination or as specified in a Letter of Agreement, pre-co-ordination or internal procedure, (4) an aircraft, vehicle, equipment, or sonnel encroached upon a landing area that was delegated to another position of oation without prior co-ordination and approval. Pilot Deviation (PD) [Definition and reporting procedures in FAA Order 8020.11]: The actions of a pilot which result in the violation of a Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) or a North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) tolerance. US definitions are not compatible with the ICAO ones as the US FAA doesn t always apply ICAO rules. Occurrences reported by US to ICAO have to be manually mapped with the ADREP database of safety occurrences, for their inclusion in the said database. 2 The US equivalent of ICAO PANS-RAC Doc. 4444. PRR 4 ANNEXES A-2

4. Definition for Runway Incursions EUROCONTROL definitions ESARR 2 where avoiding action was necessary: Any unauthorised presence on a runway of aircraft, vehicle, son or object where an avoiding action was required to prevent a collision with an aircraft. EATMP Glossary: Any occurrence at an airport that involves an aircraft, vehicle, son or object on the ground that creates a collision hazard or results in loss of separation with an aircraft taking off, intending to take off, landing or intending to land. (Co-ordination has been undertaken within EUROCONTROL, and with related activities within ICAO and the EC.) US Definition FAA order 8020.11A: Any occurrence at an airport involving an aircraft, vehicle, son, or object on the ground, that creates a collision hazard or results in a loss of separation with an aircraft taking-off, intending to take off, landing or intending to land. PRR 4 ANNEXES A-3

ANNEX 2: TOP 20 BOTTLENECKS IN SUMMER 2000 3 (ATFM EN-ROUTE DELAYS) 4 2000 Bottlenecks Reference Location Name ACC Name State/ Provider s in summer 2000 Reasons for Congestion 5 LSAZUP2 Zurich Switzerland 573 325 No remedial actions has been planned in the short-term action of the ANT/RNDSG group in 1999 and 2000. Traffic not adhering to planned FPL. There is a very high demand aggravated by the mandatory use of UL613 and the closure of SPR-RLP. Thunderstorm activity in May/June. EBMAWSL Maastricht UAC EUROCONT ROL 485 308 Non-implementation of the up level sector split due to many constraints (e.g. staff and VHF frequency availability). WSL is a single sector with a capacity of 50. There is a very high demand, all traffic departing UK to the East/Southeast and vice versa. EDUUWUR Karlsruhe Germany 474 591 Implementation of EAM04 in May and thunderstorm activity in May/June exacerbated the situation. EDUUFFM Karlsruhe Germany 441 061 'FFM is one of the busiest European ATC sectors. 'FFM is 2 sectors, with a total capacity of 60, collapsed into 1 with a capacity of 44. LECMDGO Madrid Spain 350 392 One sector. Capacity 37/hour. The vertical splitting was not implemented in early summer as it had been planned. EGTTLUE London UK 331 223 One sector (FL275-UNL) capacity 30/hour. Very high complexity and important evolving traffic in a large level band. Also affected by the North Atlantic traffic flows. LIPPNU6 Padova Italy 324 771 Complexity of the airspace structure in the BZO area. Failure to open 7th sector. Staffing issue. There are currently no scenarios designed to alleviate the sector. MERUE Paris France 323 457 1 holding stack north of Paris for Arrivals to LFPG the West/NW/SW. Capacity 20. There is very high demand due to the creation of additional runways at Paris CDG airport. EGTTS14 London UK 277 047 Arrival to London (one of the densest sectors in ECAC). LFEUE Reims France 275 903 One sector, capacity 30/35 hour. Very large military areas, very high demand above capacity (up to 60 ). LSAGISE Geneva Switzerland 275 722 Two sectors collapsed: capacity 28/30. The 2 elementary sectors are IE (capacity 30/35) and IS (capacity 26/30). Due to staff constraints, the two sectors (Lower East-IE and Lower South-IS) had to be collapsed for long iods, causing the s. LIPPNL6 Padova Italy 268 422 Collapsed sector. Complexity of the traffic due to many airports generating traffic and important military areas. LSAGKU3 Geneva Switzerland 233 932 Ks sectors (re-designed in 2000). EHDELMD Maastricht EUROCONT ROL 224 777 Large and complex sector (London departures to the NE associated to S14) and N-S traffic (Scandinavian countries to France). Many CDR and week-end routes. LSAZESL Zurich Switzerland 220 207 Capacity decreased 34 to 32 in May 2000 due to initial implementation of Airspace restructuring in Zurich. Further improvements require a civil-military co-ordination. EBMALNL Maastricht UAC EUROCONT ROL 205 875 s due to the complexity of the sector (arrivals/departures /to Dusseldorf, Brussels, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, airways crossings). Capacity decreased 45 in Nov 2000 to 35 in Jan 2001 due to co-ordination problems with Germany. 198 030 Similar to EBMALNL. Capacity decreased 37 to 27 in Winter 2001. EBMALUX Maastricht EUROCONT UAC ROL l LIPPSL6 Padova Italy 187 859 Failure to open a 7th sector in 2000. LFMYY Marseille France 171 184 Collapsed sector (staff constraints ). LFMNNR Marseille France 160 883 Arrival/departing traffic to/ Marseille FIR. The s are not attributable to Marseille ACC, but to the interaction of approach/tower ATC units and the airports. 3 Reference: ATFM oations Summer 2000 report-may/october 2000 Report, CFMU 4 A regulation is considered as "en-route" if it relates to an en-route sector. It should be noted that in some cases a regulation may be applied to en-route sectors in order to protect a downstream airport (e.g. MERUE, EGTTS14). 5 The reasons for congestion were prepared by AMN, CFMU and PRU taking into account the actual documentation (e.g. LCIPs, CHIEF, RNDSG, etc.) PRR 4 ANNEXES A-4

1999 Bottlenecks Reference Location Name LSAZUAC sectors ACC Name State/ Provider s in Summer 1999 (min) s in Summer 2000 (min) Reasons for Improvement or Deterioration Zurich Switzerland 1 364 868 917 943 ATFM strategy and new ACC configuration implemented in May 2000. LIPPNL1 Padova Italy 726 297 268 422 Opening of 2 new sectors in May 2000. LIMMWSL Milano Italy 710 204 155 506 2 sectors instead of one. LSAGKIN Geneva Switzerland 684 749 549 762 3 sectors instead of 1. EDUUFFM Karlsruhe Germany 635 254 441 061 Delegation of airspace and transfer of route UL602 Rhein to Berlin UAC. Delegation of OR5/6 Frankfurt to Berlin. LSAZWSL Zurich Switzerland 487 200 109 882 De-concentration of lower traffic through specialised and de-conflicted arrival/departure routes. Reduction of the total demand on Zurich sectors through direct hand over between Basel/Reims and Basel/Karlsruhe. Balanced distribution of the total traffic demand into four sectors (instead of three). LFEBRUT (UR) Reims France 637 647 86 281 Resectorisation in Reims, through the creation of a new sector (XR). Redefinition of route network in the area. LFFTE Paris France 459 442 32 266 Creation of segregated and specialised routes. Resectorisation through the creation of specialised sectors. LIPPNU1 Padova Italy 473 519 324 771 End of Kosovo crisis. ATC sector capacity increase. LFMMF1 Marseille France 445 713 5953 The transfer of 2 sectors in Bordeaux allowed the opening of the elementary sectors M and F. Realignment of UH sector in Bordeaux and M in Marseille. LECBCEN Barcelona Spain 424 094 50 569 Increased number of sectors simultaneously opened. LIPPSL1 Padova Italy 392 978 187 859 End of Kosovo crisis. ATC sector capacity increase. LECBECO Barcelona Spain 362 617 91 012 Increased number of sectors simultaneously opened. LFEUE Reims France 348 141 275 903 Reduced military activity during peak traffic demand. LSAZESL Zurich Switzerland 341 571 220 207 De-concentration of lower traffic through specialised and de-conflicted arrival/departure routes. Reduction of the total demand on Zurich sectors through direct hand over between Basel/Reims and Basel/Karlsruhe. Balanced distribution of the total traffic demand into four sectors (instead of three). EBMALUX Maastricht Eurocontrol 329 570 198 030 Earlier opening time and changed traffic patterns after Kosovo crisis. LSAGINS Geneva Switzerland 285 576 337 741 Structural reasons; the INS suite has been a bottleneck at least since 1998. Two sectors collapsed: capacity 28/30. The 2 elementary sectors are IE (capacity 30/35) and IS (capacity 26/30). Due to the shortage of staff, the two sectors (Lower East-IE and Lower South-IS) had to be collapsed for long iods, causing s. However, even when the two elementary sectors are opened, s occur. EGTTS14 London UK 281 197 277 047 The CLW suite has been a bottleneck since 1998, but the situation is rather stable.. LFMK1 Marseille France 276 854 106 125 In 2000 the K suite was further split into 4 sectors (E1, K1, E2, K2). Staff shortage and civil-military issues between Milan and Marseille. EBMALNL Maastricht Eurocontrol 271 662 205 875 Capacity was reduced during Kosovo crisis. Small change 1999 to 2000 +/- 25 of ATFM Improving 1999 to 2000 < -25 of ATFM There was no deterioration in ATFM s above 25 1999 to 2000. PRR 4 ANNEXES A-5

ANNEX 3: ATFM DATA CFMU Area Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 CFMU Area 1997 19 19.5 3.7 2.9 3863 724 14141 11328 15 18.9 2.9 2.2 7177 1106 20931 15489 CFMU Area 1998 22 22.8 5.0 4.1 4052 886 20180 16586 5 43 46 17 21.2 3.6 2.9 7550 1291 27387 21618 5 31 40 CFMU Area 1999 25 25.7 6.3 5.5 4364 1075 27612 24121 8 37 45 21 25.1 5.4 4.5 8053 1727 43263 36295 7 58 68 CFMU Area 2000 21 21.2 4.5 3.6 4531 961 20386 16113 4-26 -33 19 20.3 3.8 2.9 8443 1569 31838 24382 5-27 -33 s ACC ACC Name Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 EBBU BRUSSELS 1997 1 27.6 0.3 0.0 256 3.2 89 13 1 28.5 0.3 0.1 485 4.9 138 27 1998 2 23.7 0.4 0.1 282 4.5 106 30 10 19 135 1 24.0 0.3 0.1 528 7.3 176 52 9 27 94 1999 3 20.7 0.6 0.1 305 9.0 187 20 8 75-34 3 23.7 0.7 0.1 575 16.7 395 29 9 124-44 2000 2 23.6 0.6 0.3 308 7.5 177 84 1-5 324 2 23.1 0.6 0.2 586 14.3 330 119 2-17 313 EDBB BERLIN 1997 0 38.3 0.0 0.0 195 0.1 2 0 0 38.4 0.0 0.0 356 0.1 4 0 1998 0 13.1 0.1 0.0 202 0.9 11 0 4 392 0 13.1 0.0 0.0 371 0.9 11 0 4 204 1999 1 23.8 0.2 0.2 262 1.9 44 43 30 296 1 23.1 0.1 0.1 456 2.4 54 53 23 390 2000 1 22.1 0.1 0.1 269 1.7 38 34 2-13 -22 0 21.1 0.1 0.1 491 2.4 50 45 7-9 -15 EDFF FRANKFURT 1997 1 15.3 0.2 0.2 393 5.6 86 72 1 18.2 0.2 0.1 739 9.0 163 98 1998 3 16.7 0.4 0.3 412 11.0 184 132 5 113 84 2 18.0 0.4 0.2 775 15.7 284 157 5 74 61 1999 8 21.5 1.7 0.8 440 35.8 768 373 7 318 182 8 22.1 1.7 0.6 824 61.9 1369 516 6 383 229 2000 10 18.9 2.0 0.8 451 47.1 892 352 3 16-5 12 18.2 2.1 0.8 846 98.4 1791 696 2 30 34 EDLL DUSSELDORF 1997 4 12.4 0.5 0.1 259 11.4 142 17 4 13.3 0.5 0.1 485 18.1 240 37 1998 3 15.1 0.4 0.4 269 7.8 118 105 4-17 537 3 15.6 0.4 0.3 505 13.1 205 172 4-15 367 s PRR 4 ANNEXES A-6

ACC ACC Name Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 1999 2 22.8 0.5 0.4 284 5.8 131 117 6 12 12 2 23.3 0.4 0.4 529 10.2 237 192 5 16 12 2000 3 15.8 0.5 0.5 295 10.0 158 135 4 21 15 4 18.4 0.7 0.6 546 19.6 361 323 3 52 68 EDMM MUNCHEN 1997 2 15.8 0.3 0.3 424 7.1 112 107 1 16.2 0.2 0.2 750 10.7 173 154 1998 1 15.6 0.2 0.1 434 4.3 67 59 2-40 -45 1 17.7 0.1 0.1 772 6.1 108 68 3-37 -56 1999 1 19.3 0.1 0.1 429 3.2 62 52-1 -8-12 1 22.2 0.2 0.1 773 6.9 154 75 0 42 10 2000 3 20.7 0.6 0.5 486 15.2 314 258 13 404 396 2 20.5 0.4 0.3 859 18.6 381 277 11 147 269 EDUU KARLSRUHE 1997 7 15.9 1.2 1.2 393 29.1 462 462 7 14.9 1.0 1.0 698 45.5 676 676 1998 16 16.6 2.6 2.6 411 65.4 1087 1087 4 135 135 11 16.0 1.8 1.8 731 80.4 1285 1285 5 90 90 1999 11 19.5 2.2 2.2 431 49.3 962 962 5-11 -11 8 18.7 1.6 1.6 777 65.6 1225 1225 6-5 -5 2000 14 16.5 2.2 2.2 488 65.9 1089 1089 13 13 13 10 15.9 1.7 1.7 865 89.8 1428 1428 11 16 16 EDWW BREMEN 1997 0 9.4 0.0 0.0 173 0.0 0 0 0 12.0 0.0 0.0 325 0.3 3 0 1998 0 24.5 0.0 0.0 179 0.1 1 0 3 421-33 0 17.5 0.0 0.0 334 0.4 7 0 3 121 8 1999 1 28.1 0.2 0.1 191 1.1 31 25 7 1 24.0 0.1 0.1 358 2.2 53 41 7 655 2000 2 18.3 0.3 0.1 210 4.0 73 17 10 136-29 1 18.1 0.2 0.1 386 4.5 81 20 8 51-51 EDYY MAASTRICHT 1997 5 14.2 0.7 0.7 534 27.3 388 388 4 13.6 0.5 0.5 996 38.8 528 528 1998 4 17.1 0.6 0.6 592 21.6 370 370 11-5 -5 3 15.7 0.5 0.5 1095 34.5 540 540 10 2 2 1999 10 20.2 2.0 2.0 633 62.0 1253 1253 7 239 239 7 19.4 1.4 1.4 1170 83.9 1629 1629 7 201 201 2000 11 18.3 2.0 2.0 660 71.1 1302 1302 4 4 4 9 17.2 1.5 1.5 1223 107.3 1850 1850 4 13 13 EFES TAMPERE 1997 0 11.6 0.0 0.0 78 0.0 0 0 1 23.3 0.1 0.0 157 0.9 21 3 1998 4 19.4 0.9 0.8 91 4.1 79 71 16 4 20.3 0.7 0.6 181 6.6 133 100 15 523 1999 2 22.8 0.5 0.3 98 2.1 47 31 8-41 -56 2 21.4 0.3 0.2 178 2.9 62 33-1 -53-67 2000 1 18.1 0.3 0.0 95 1.3 24 1-3 -49-98 1 21.5 0.3 0.1 191 2.3 50 11 7-19 -66 EFPS ROVANIEMI 1997 0 0.0 0.0 11 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 23 0.0 0 0 s 1998 0 0.0 0.0 12 0.0 0 0 11 0 0.0 0.0 26 0.0 0 0 10 1999 0 0.0 0.0 15 0.0 0 0 24 0 0.0 0.0 29 0.0 0 0 14 2000 0 0.0 0.0 14 0.0 0 0-3 0 0.0 0.0 32 0.0 0 0 7 EGCC MANCHESTER 1997 3 7.8 0.2 0.2 171 4.4 34 31 2 8.8 0.2 0.2 313 7.1 62 54 1998 0 10.0 0.0 0.0 188 0.4 4 3 10-87 -91 1 9.3 0.1 0.1 339 3.1 29 25 8-54 -54 PRR 4 ANNEXES A-7

ACC ACC Name Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 1999 1 11.2 0.1 0.1 199 2.5 28 19 5 538 568 1 13.3 0.1 0.1 360 4.0 52 31 6 83 24 2000 1 11.7 0.1 0.1 235 2.1 25 15 18-10 -20 3 10.9 0.3 0.2 419 11.0 121 85 16 130 177 EGPX SCOTTISH 1997 0 17.1 0.0 0.0 239 0.3 5 5 0 15.0 0.0 0.0 436 0.7 11 11 1998 0 18.3 0.0 0.0 251 0.4 7 5 5 38 6 0 18.2 0.0 0.0 465 0.7 13 6 7 14-44 1999 0 17.9 0.1 0.0 283 0.9 17 14 13 137 154 0 18.6 0.1 0.0 508 1.6 29 18 9 132 206 2000 2 18.5 0.3 0.3 268 4.4 80 78-6 381 469 1 18.5 0.2 0.2 503 5.6 104 99-1 256 443 EGTT LONDON 1997 14 15.9 2.2 1.8 776 107.7 1717 1411 12 16.2 2.0 1.4 1405 170.4 2759 1999 1998 16 19.0 3.0 2.8 836 130.1 2468 2321 8 44 64 14 17.6 2.4 2.1 1520 206.0 3618 3231 8 31 62 1999 12 20.1 2.3 2.1 902 103.8 2091 1933 8-15 -17 10 19.0 1.8 1.6 1643 157.8 3003 2662 8-17 -18 2000 13 21.8 2.8 2.5 941 120.9 2638 2369 4 26 23 11 20.8 2.2 1.9 1715 184.1 3826 3192 4 27 20 EHAA AMSTERDAM 1997 5 14.3 0.7 0.4 239 12.1 173 98 6 19.7 1.1 0.4 455 25.6 503 160 1998 15 23.8 3.7 1.3 256 39.4 937 345 7 443 253 12 25.4 3.0 0.9 486 57.1 1451 425 7 188 166 1999 3 22.8 0.6 0.1 269 7.1 161 36 5-83 -90 4 27.0 1.0 0.1 507 19.2 520 57 4-64 -87 2000 6 29.0 1.8 0.4 282 17.5 507 105 5 215 193 5 30.7 1.6 0.3 535 28.5 874 149 5 68 159 EIDW DUBLIN 1997 0 15.0 0.0 0.0 83 0.2 4 1 0 15.0 0.0 0.0 150 0.2 4 1 1998 0 22.6 0.1 0.0 90 0.4 8 0 8 129-100 1 16.8 0.1 0.0 161 1.0 16 7 7 338 951 1999 1 13.4 0.2 0.2 94 1.1 15 14 5 81 1 13.2 0.1 0.1 169 1.8 24 20 5 52 197 2000 1 19.2 0.2 0.1 100 0.9 17 8 6 9-46 1 20.1 0.1 0.1 180 1.3 27 9 6 10-54 EISN SHANNON 1997 0 0.0 0.0 130 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 229 0.0 0 0 s 1998 0 0.0 0.0 140 0.0 0 0 8 0 0.0 0.0 250 0.0 0 0 9 1999 0 4.0 0.0 0.0 159 0.0 0 0 13 0 0.0 0.0 278 0.0 0 0 11 2000 0 50.4 0.0 0.0 162 0.0 0 0 2 0 0.0 0.0 291 0.0 1 0 4 EKDK COPENHAGEN 1997 1 16.3 0.2 0.1 219 2.7 45 11 2 16.8 0.3 0.0 420 8.5 144 19 1998 1 19.0 0.1 0.0 224 1.5 28 11 2-37 1 1 18.5 0.2 0.0 431 5.0 92 12 2-36 -38 1999 1 17.4 0.1 0.0 241 1.6 29 11 8 2-2 1 20.5 0.2 0.0 458 4.4 90 11 6-2 -2 2000 0 24.1 0.1 0.0 244 0.9 21 2 1-29 -81 1 19.6 0.1 0.0 473 3.5 69 3 3-23 -74 ENBD BODO 1997 0 0.0 0.0 48 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 93 0.0 0 0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 47 0.0 0 0-2 0 0.0 0.0 93 0.0 0 0 1 PRR 4 ANNEXES A-8

ACC ACC Name Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 s 1999 0 10.0 0.0 0.0 58 0.0 0 0 24 0 10.0 0.0 0.0 105 0.0 0 0 12 2000 0 12.8 0.0 0.0 59 0.0 0 0 2 285-100 0 12.8 0.0 0.0 116 0.0 0 0 10 284-100 ENOS OSLO 1997 0 14.5 0.0 0.0 118 0.2 3 0 0 24.7 0.1 0.0 226 1.0 25 3 1998 6 31.5 1.8 1.1 121 6.7 212 130 2 4 28.7 1.1 0.6 238 9.0 258 140 5 1999 5 23.4 1.2 0.3 155 8.2 192 39 28-10 -70 5 26.0 1.4 0.2 288 15.8 410 67 21 59-52 2000 0 19.9 0.1 0.0 139 0.5 10 5-10 -95-88 1 14.8 0.2 0.0 268 3.1 45 5-7 -89-92 ENSV STAVANGER 1997 0 0.0 0.0 54 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 102 0.0 0 0 1998 0 14.5 0.0 0.0 55 0.0 0 0 2 0 14.5 0.0 0.0 108 0.0 0 0 5 1999 4 14.0 0.5 0.5 81 2.8 40 40 46 2 14.0 0.3 0.3 143 2.8 40 40 33 2000 1 18.8 0.2 0.1 69 0.6 12 6-15 -71-84 1 21.0 0.2 0.1 132 1.0 22 14-8 -46-66 ENTR TRONDHEIM 1997 0 0.0 0.0 38 0.0 0 0 0 27.6 0.0 0.0 74 0.0 1 1 1998 0 0.0 0.0 39 0.0 0 0 2 0 0.0 0.0 80 0.0 0 0 7-100 -100 1999 0 0.0 0.0 54 0.0 0 0 38 0 25.1 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 1 0 27 2000 0 0.0 0.0 53 0.0 0 0-2 0 30.3 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 0 0 0-78 -100 EPWW WARSZAW 1997 4 23.6 0.9 0.9 113 4.4 105 104 3 23.8 0.6 0.6 196 5.1 121 121 1998 3 20.3 0.6 0.6 120 3.4 70 70 6-33 -33 2 20.2 0.3 0.3 210 3.6 73 73 7-40 -40 1999 9 26.1 2.3 2.3 136 11.8 308 308 13 341 341 5 26.1 1.3 1.3 235 11.9 310 310 12 326 327 2000 5 20.8 1.1 1.1 138 7.1 148 145 1-52 -53 4 20.9 0.8 0.7 245 8.8 185 171 4-40 -45 ESMM MALMO 1997 0 0.0 0.0 204 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 385 0.0 0 0 1998 3 26.3 0.7 0.6 213 5.7 149 119 4 1 26.2 0.4 0.3 406 5.7 150 119 6 1999 0 16.2 0.0 0.0 233 0.6 9 9 9-94 -92 0 17.4 0.0 0.0 438 0.6 11 9 8-93 -92 2000 0 6.0 0.0 0.0 238 0.0 0 0 2-98 -98 0 6.0 0.0 0.0 456 0.0 0 0 4-99 -98 ESOS STOCKHOLM 1997 1 15.5 0.2 0.0 186 1.9 29 2 1 16.7 0.2 0.0 365 5.4 90 3 1998 5 25.6 1.4 0.9 192 10.4 267 180 3 4 23.1 0.9 0.5 380 14.0 325 180 4 1999 0 18.4 0.0 0.0 201 0.3 5 1 5-98 -99 1 24.0 0.1 0.0 389 2.2 54 3 2-83 -99 2000 0 29.9 0.1 0.0 201 0.6 17 2 0 228 12 0 26.2 0.1 0.0 400 1.9 51 2 3-7 -26 ESUN SUNDSVALL 1997 0 0.0 0.0 38 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 76 0.0 0 0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 35 0.0 0 0-7 0 22.2 0.0 0.0 75 0.2 3 3-2 PRR 4 ANNEXES A-9

ACC ACC Name Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 1999 0 0.0 0.0 45 0.0 0 0 28 0 0.0 0.0 86 0.0 0 0 14-100 -100 s 2000 0 0.0 0.0 41 0.0 0 0-9 0 29.8 0.0 0.0 86 0.1 2 2 0 GCCC CANARIAS 1997 0 0.0 0.0 97 0.0 0 0 1 23.3 0.2 0.2 203 1.9 43 34 1998 1 64.9 0.6 0.2 104 1.0 63 24 7 3 31.7 0.9 0.6 217 6.4 203 137 7 367 301 1999 5 27.7 1.4 0.6 121 5.9 164 73 16 161 199 6 27.7 1.8 1.1 242 15.7 435 274 12 114 100 2000 1 18.4 0.2 0.1 123 1.3 23 18 2-86 -75 3 24.2 0.7 0.6 250 7.3 176 141 3-60 -49 LAAA TIRANA ACC 2000 9 22.4 2.0 2.0 50 4.5 100 100 6 22.3 1.4 1.4 77 4.9 109 109 LBSR SOFIA 1997 0 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 152 0.0 0 0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 106 0.0 0 0 6 0 0.0 0.0 161 0.0 0 0 6 1999 0 0.0 0.0 158 0.0 0 0 48 0 335.0 0.0 0.0 225 0.0 2 2 40 2000 0 0.0 0.0 118 0.0 0 0-25 0 0.0 0.0 187 0.0 0 0-17 -100-100 LBWR VARNA 1997 0 0.0 0.0 82 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 135 0.0 0 0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 78 0.0 0 0-6 0 0.0 0.0 125 0.0 0 0-8 1999 0 0.0 0.0 87 0.0 0 0 12 0 0.0 0.0 138 0.0 0 0 11 2000 0 0.0 0.0 77 0.0 0 0-12 0 0.0 0.0 126 0.0 0 0-9 LCCC NICOSIA 1997 0 20.4 0.1 0.1 89 0.3 5 5 0 19.4 0.0 0.0 160 0.3 6 6 1998 5 28.2 1.3 1.3 94 4.5 127 127 6 2258 2258 3 27.5 0.8 0.8 169 5.1 140 140 5 2085 2085 1999 4 26.4 1.1 1.1 107 4.5 119 119 14-6 -6 3 25.3 0.8 0.8 190 5.9 150 150 13 7 7 2000 3 22.2 0.6 0.6 118 3.3 73 73 10-39 -39 3 22.5 0.7 0.7 211 6.5 147 147 11-2 -2 LDZO ZAGREB 1997 0 19.1 0.0 0.0 45 0.0 0 0 0 19.1 0.0 0.0 76 0.0 0 0 1998 3 22.4 0.6 0.6 67 1.8 39 39 49 9210 2 22.4 0.4 0.4 111 1.8 39 39 47 9210 1999 0 26.3 0.1 0.0 39 0.1 3 0-41 -93-100 0 24.7 0.1 0.0 73 0.1 4 1-34 -91-98 2000 1 20.2 0.2 0.2 110 0.9 18 18 182 572 1 20.3 0.1 0.1 164 0.9 18 18 123 401 1937 LECB BARCELONA 1997 8 19.8 1.6 0.8 260 21.0 417 221 8 20.3 1.7 0.8 433 35.2 715 356 1998 8 25.3 2.0 1.5 274 21.1 535 412 5 28 87 6 23.3 1.4 1.0 451 27.1 632 452 4-12 27 1999 14 34.7 4.8 4.6 307 42.8 1488 1399 12 178 239 13 32.4 4.2 3.6 507 65.9 2132 1822 12 237 303 2000 8 20.0 1.6 0.9 329 25.5 510 309 7-66 -78 8 18.4 1.4 0.8 549 41.7 767 443 8-64 -76 LECM MADRID 1997 11 16.2 1.8 0.8 303 34.4 556 244 15 17.7 2.6 0.9 586 85.6 1514 542 PRR 4 ANNEXES A-10

ACC ACC Name Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 1998 7 25.7 1.9 1.3 326 24.4 628 422 8 13 73 8 23.4 1.8 1.1 630 48.7 1139 700 8-25 29 1999 13 24.1 3.0 2.6 371 46.3 1117 971 14 78 130 17 24.7 4.1 3.5 704 117.3 2900 2485 12 155 255 2000 16 20.2 3.3 2.9 405 66.7 1349 1193 9 21 23 16 18.9 3.0 2.7 774 124.4 2347 2061 10-19 -17 LECP PALMA 1997 4 18.6 0.8 0.2 131 5.8 107 23 3 18.7 0.6 0.2 190 6.4 120 31 1998 2 55.1 1.3 0.8 144 3.3 182 122 10 70 431 2 48.6 1.0 0.6 208 4.1 199 127 10 66 311 1999 1 38.5 0.6 0.3 156 2.3 90 41 8-51 -66 1 37.1 0.4 0.2 226 2.6 98 45 9-51 -64 2000 1 41.3 0.4 0.1 164 1.7 70 15 5-22 -64 1 38.1 0.3 0.1 239 2.1 81 21 6-18 -54 LECS SEVILLA 1997 0 29.9 0.1 0.0 118 0.4 12 4 0 28.7 0.1 0.1 223 0.9 25 18 1998 2 41.9 0.7 0.6 124 2.0 86 76 6 643 1822 1 36.7 0.4 0.4 238 2.8 104 95 7 315 440 1999 3 29.2 0.8 0.8 140 4.0 118 115 12 37 51 3 29.9 0.9 0.8 259 7.3 220 202 9 111 112 2000 2 23.2 0.5 0.5 145 3.1 71 71 4-40 -38 2 22.4 0.4 0.4 276 4.4 98 98 6-55 -52 LFBB BORDEAUX 1997 2 17.8 0.3 0.3 316 4.8 85 83 1 16.6 0.2 0.2 571 8.0 132 130 1998 1 20.7 0.2 0.2 340 4.0 82 81 8-4 -2 1 19.3 0.2 0.2 617 5.0 97 93 8-27 -29 1999 2 27.4 0.7 0.7 368 9.1 248 241 8 203 195 2 26.2 0.5 0.5 659 12.8 336 325 7 246 249 2000 7 23.4 1.6 1.6 385 26.3 615 609 4 148 153 5 22.0 1.0 1.0 695 31.9 702 691 5 109 112 LFEE REIMS 1997 19 19.6 3.8 3.7 346 66.3 1299 1275 17 18.6 3.2 3.2 638 110.4 2055 2023 1998 22 21.5 4.7 4.4 342 75.1 1613 1520-1 24 19 18 19.9 3.6 3.4 640 116.7 2326 2208 0 13 9 1999 21 25.2 5.3 4.8 369 77.7 1960 1784 8 22 17 21 24.1 5.0 4.6 683 142.8 3445 3111 7 48 41 2000 14 20.2 2.7 2.5 371 50.4 1018 937 1-48 -47 14 19.3 2.6 2.3 696 94.3 1820 1614 2-47 -48 LFFF PARIS 1997 13 19.7 2.5 2.3 538 68.0 1342 1227 11 19.5 2.1 1.8 1019 108.8 2128 1794 1998 12 19.0 2.3 2.1 558 67.3 1280 1196 4-5 -3 11 19.1 2.1 1.8 1065 118.5 2264 1901 5 6 6 1999 9 23.5 2.1 1.8 603 54.9 1290 1114 8 1-7 9 22.7 2.0 1.7 1131 100.7 2290 1912 6 1 1 2000 6 26.2 1.6 1.1 626 38.7 1015 690 4-21 -38 6 24.1 1.5 1.1 1195 75.9 1828 1261 5-20 -34 LFMM MARSEILLE 1997 12 20.7 2.6 2.4 412 50.9 1055 985 10 19.7 2.0 1.8 735 74.0 1462 1356 1998 10 24.0 2.3 1.9 437 42.5 1020 829 6-3 -16 7 22.8 1.7 1.2 789 58.8 1339 977 7-8 -28 1999 17 30.7 5.3 5.0 500 86.8 2666 2507 15 161 202 14 28.7 4.0 3.6 887 122.3 3513 3214 13 162 229 2000 12 21.8 2.6 2.2 504 59.5 1297 1095 1-51 -56 9 21.3 1.9 1.5 908 79.1 1686 1359 2-52 -58 LFRR BREST 1997 2 16.6 0.3 0.3 238 4.0 66 66 1 16.0 0.2 0.2 435 6.3 101 101 s PRR 4 ANNEXES A-11

ACC ACC Name Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 1998 6 22.2 1.4 1.4 304 18.8 417 417 28 529 529 5 20.3 1.0 1.0 545 27.7 561 561 25 455 455 1999 1 34.2 0.3 0.3 375 3.5 119 119 23-71 -72 1 30.2 0.2 0.2 659 5.2 158 157 21-72 -72 2000 2 27.2 0.6 0.6 399 8.4 229 229 6 93 93 1 27.4 0.4 0.4 707 9.2 253 253 7 60 60 LGGG ATHINAI 1997 36 30.9 11.2 5.7 184 66.7 2057 1046 23 30.5 7.2 3.6 296 69.4 2114 1050 1998 38 37.2 14.1 8.2 186 70.2 2613 1531 1 27 46 24 36.8 9.0 5.2 294 71.9 2645 1538-1 25 46 1999 16 37.8 6.0 2.4 216 34.1 1292 528 16-51 -66 11 37.7 4.2 1.7 336 37.4 1411 572 14-47 -63 2000 14 29.0 3.9 0.2 234 31.7 920 41 8-29 -92 10 28.2 2.9 0.1 369 37.5 1056 53 9-25 -91 LGMD MAKEDONIA 1997 12 29.6 3.5 3.3 98 11.6 343 325 8 29.6 2.3 2.2 153 12.0 355 336 1998 19 42.0 8.1 7.3 103 19.9 837 746 5 144 130 13 41.7 5.3 4.7 161 20.2 843 749 5 137 123 1999 5 38.7 1.9 1.1 99 5.0 192 104-4 -77-86 3 37.6 1.3 0.7 155 5.4 203 111-4 -76-85 2000 3 35.0 1.0 0.1 120 3.3 117 17 21-39 -84 2 34.9 0.8 0.1 183 3.9 138 22 18-32 -81 LHCC BUDAPEST 1997 11 21.2 2.3 2.3 257 27.7 587 587 7 20.5 1.5 1.5 416 30.4 623 623 1998 7 18.7 1.4 1.4 246 18.4 344 344-4 -41-41 5 18.2 0.9 0.9 400 20.8 378 378-4 -39-39 1999 5 23.7 1.3 1.3 249 13.3 316 316 1-8 -8 4 23.0 0.9 0.9 401 15.1 348 346 0-8 -8 2000 1 20.0 0.2 0.2 249 2.5 50 50 0-84 -84 1 19.2 0.1 0.1 413 2.9 56 56 3-84 -84 LIBB BRINDISI 1997 2 21.8 0.3 0.3 86 1.3 29 29 1 20.7 0.3 0.3 137 1.8 38 38 1998 1 27.4 0.2 0.2 95 0.7 20 20 10-29 -29 1 26.5 0.2 0.2 147 0.8 22 22 7-42 -42 1999 4 30.0 1.2 1.2 134 5.4 163 163 41 704 704 3 29.6 0.8 0.8 206 5.6 167 167 40 653 653 2000 3 24.2 0.7 0.7 126 3.8 92 92-6 -44-44 2 23.5 0.5 0.5 212 4.5 105 101 3-37 -40 LIMM MILANO 1997 12 20.1 2.4 2.0 302 35.5 716 603 9 20.3 1.8 1.2 557 50.5 1026 684 1998 13 24.0 3.0 2.3 323 40.5 971 737 7 36 22 9 22.5 2.1 1.5 595 54.9 1238 904 7 21 32 1999 11 34.9 3.7 3.3 392 41.2 1439 1294 21 48 76 10 33.1 3.3 3.0 707 70.2 2324 2099 19 88 132 2000 11 22.2 2.4 1.6 365 38.8 862 574-7 -40-56 8 22.1 1.7 1.1 691 52.3 1155 742-3 -50-65 LIPP PADOVA 1997 9 22.3 1.9 1.9 193 16.5 367 357 6 21.5 1.3 1.3 326 19.5 420 410 1998 14 22.7 3.1 2.9 214 29.4 666 613 11 82 72 10 22.3 2.2 2.1 359 35.6 792 738 10 89 80 1999 27 34.9 9.3 9.2 268 71.4 2493 2473 25 274 303 25 33.6 8.3 8.2 446 109.6 3686 3648 24 365 394 2000 17 24.3 4.2 4.1 268 46.6 1133 1098 0-55 -56 18 23.8 4.2 4.1 461 81.0 1926 1883 3-48 -49 LIRR ROMA 1997 5 18.3 1.0 0.7 313 17.0 311 229 4 17.8 0.7 0.5 568 22.0 391 258 s PRR 4 ANNEXES A-12

ACC ACC Name Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 1998 2 25.4 0.6 0.3 331 7.9 201 103 6-35 -55 2 21.4 0.4 0.2 593 12.2 261 111 4-33 -57 1999 5 23.2 1.2 0.7 393 20.1 467 257 19 133 149 5 25.4 1.3 0.7 691 34.6 880 451 17 237 308 2000 3 21.7 0.6 0.2 433 11.2 243 93 10-48 -64 2 22.3 0.5 0.1 756 17.4 388 99 9-56 -78 LJLA LJUBLJANA 1997 0 0.0 0.0 42 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 69 0.0 0 0 s 1998 0 0.0 0.0 64 0.0 0 0 51 0 0.0 0.0 106 0.0 0 0 54 1999 1 15.5 0.1 0.1 42 0.3 4 4-35 0 15.5 0.1 0.1 77 0.3 4 4-28 2000 0 0.0 0.0 89 0.0 0 0 114 0 0.0 0.0 135 0.0 0 0 76 LKAA PRAHA 1997 0 13.9 0.0 0.0 131 0.0 0 0 0 13.9 0.0 0.0 226 0.0 0 0 1998 0 22.6 0.0 0.0 140 0.0 1 1 6 0 22.6 0.0 0.0 245 0.0 1 1 8 1999 18 20.1 3.7 3.7 176 32.3 650 650 26 13 20.0 2.6 2.6 301 39.8 796 796 23 2000 4 17.7 0.6 0.6 174 6.3 111 111-1 -83-83 5 16.9 0.9 0.9 307 16.5 278 278 2-65 -65 LMMM MALTA 1997 0 0.0 0.0 27 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 46 0.0 0 0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 27 0.0 0 0 3 0 0.0 0.0 48 0.0 0 0 6 1999 0 0.1 0.0 32 0.0 2 0 17 0 89.4 0.0 0.0 55 0.0 2 0 14 2000 0 0.0 0.0 34 0.0 0 0 6 0 31.3 0.0 0.0 60 0.0 1 1 8 LOVV WIEN 1997 0 31.9 0.0 0.0 291 0.3 10 10 0 26.7 0.0 0.0 501 0.7 19 19 1998 1 20.0 0.2 0.2 289 2.9 58 57-1 461 451 1 18.9 0.2 0.1 501 4.8 90 75 0 364 288 1999 2 14.5 0.3 0.0 248 4.8 69 1-14 20-98 2 15.4 0.2 0.0 446 6.9 107 3-11 19-96 2000 1 13.6 0.1 0.0 314 2.4 33 0 26-52 -59 1 15.3 0.1 0.0 534 4.8 73 1 19-32 -67 LPPC LISBOA 1997 5 18.3 0.9 0.9 124 6.0 109 106 7 19.2 1.3 1.2 236 15.6 299 277 1998 8 19.3 1.6 1.6 142 12.0 230 225 15 111 112 9 19.5 1.8 1.8 269 25.2 492 485 14 64 75 1999 6 26.0 1.5 1.3 157 8.8 230 201 11 0-10 6 26.2 1.7 1.5 299 19.1 499 462 11 2-5 2000 3 21.0 0.6 0.6 160 4.9 103 102 2-55 -49 4 21.7 0.8 0.8 306 11.5 250 247 2-50 -47 LQSB SARAJEVO 1997 1 18.9 0.1 0.1 17 0.1 2 2 1 15.3 0.1 0.1 31 0.2 4 4 1998 1 26.4 0.2 0.2 37 0.3 7 7 119 229 229 1 19.4 0.2 0.2 64 0.6 11 11 109 208 208 1999 0 0.0 0.0 13 0.0 0 0-64 -100-100 0 18.3 0.1 0.1 32 0.1 3 3-49 -77-77 2000 0 0.0 0.0 11 0.0 0 0-20 0 0.0 0.0 23 0.0 0 0-29 -100-100 LRAR ARAD 1997 0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 166 0.0 0 0 PRR 4 ANNEXES A-13

ACC ACC Name Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 s 1998 0 0.0 0.0 113 0.0 0 0 12 0 0.0 0.0 181 0.0 0 0 9 1999 0 0.0 0.0 187 0.0 0 0 66 0 0.0 0.0 276 0.0 0 0 52 2000 0 0.0 0.0 132 0.0 0 0-29 0 0.0 0.0 224 0.0 0 0-19 LRBB BUCURESTI 1997 0 0.0 0.0 133 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 216 0.0 0 0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 141 0.0 0 0 6 0 0.0 0.0 225 0.0 0 0 4 1999 0 0.0 0.0 235 0.0 4 4 66 0 0.0 0.0 353 0.0 4 4 57 2000 0 0.0 0.0 165 0.0 0 0-30 0 0.0 0.0 281 0.0 0 0-21 LRBC BACAU 1997 0 0.0 0.0 13 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 19 0.0 0 0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 11 0.0 0 0-12 0 0.0 0.0 17 0.0 0 0-10 1999 0 0.0 0.0 15 0.0 0 0 31 0 0.0 0.0 22 0.0 0 0 34 2000 0 0.0 0.0 12 0.0 0 0-15 0 0.0 0.0 20 0.0 0 0-9 LRCK CONSTANTA 1997 0 0.0 0.0 34 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 51 0.0 0 0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 35 0.0 0 0 3 0 0.0 0.0 57 0.0 0 0 12 1999 0 0.0 0.0 44 0.0 0 0 26 0 0.0 0.0 76 0.0 0 0 32 2000 0 0.0 0.0 36 0.0 0 0-19 0 0.0 0.0 68 0.0 0 0-11 LRCL CLUJ-NAPOCA 1997 0 0.0 0.0 20 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 29 0.0 0 0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 25 0.0 0 0 27 0 0.0 0.0 41 0.0 0 0 39 1999 0 0.0 0.0 75 0.0 0 0 197 0 0.0 0.0 110 0.0 0 0 169 2000 0 0.0 0.0 59 0.0 0 0-21 0 0.0 0.0 96 0.0 0 0-13 LSAG GENEVE 1997 13 20.5 2.7 2.7 260 34.2 701 701 9 19.5 1.8 1.8 475 45.1 879 875 1998 19 19.9 3.8 3.8 281 53.4 1063 1063 8 52 52 15 18.6 2.8 2.8 510 75.4 1406 1402 7 60 60 1999 20 26.8 5.3 5.3 292 57.8 1546 1545 4 45 45 18 26.7 4.9 4.9 532 97.9 2616 2610 4 86 86 2000 18 21.0 3.9 3.8 300 55.0 1155 1151 3-25 -26 17 19.4 3.3 3.2 553 94.1 1825 1775 4-30 -32 LSAZ ZURICH 1997 9 16.3 1.5 1.2 335 30.3 492 417 7 15.8 1.1 0.9 623 44.2 696 552 1998 12 19.5 2.4 2.2 362 44.4 865 779 8 76 87 11 18.2 2.0 1.7 667 72.7 1323 1120 7 90 103 1999 31 22.2 6.9 6.4 388 120.0 2660 2483 7 207 219 27 22.3 6.1 5.4 711 195.2 4346 3866 7 228 245 2000 20 19.3 3.8 3.3 411 81.9 1579 1371 6-41 -45 20 18.6 3.6 3.1 758 148.5 2757 2316 6-37 -40 LTAA ANKARA 1997 0 0.0 0.0 152 0.0 0 0 0 45.1 0.0 0.0 266 0.0 1 0 PRR 4 ANNEXES A-14

ACC ACC Name Year SUMMER s s YEAR s min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 min. min. min. '000 '000 '000 '000 s 1998 0 0.0 0.0 156 0.0 0 0 3 0 0.0 0.0 273 0.0 0 0 2 1999 0 0.0 0.0 158 0.0 0 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 280 0.0 0 0 3 2000 0 0.0 0.0 157 0.0 0 0-1 0 0.0 0.0 284 0.0 0 0 1 LTBB ISTANBUL 1997 0 39.7 0.1 0.0 211 0.5 20 4 0 37.7 0.1 0.0 355 0.6 23 6 1998 0 42.6 0.0 0.0 211 0.1 4 1 0 0 38.0 0.0 0.0 353 0.1 6 1-1 1999 0 11.7 0.0 0.0 200 0.0 0 0-5 0 11.7 0.0 0.0 341 0.0 0 0-3 2000 0 8.7 0.0 0.0 205 0.0 0 0 3 0 9.5 0.0 0.0 348 0.0 0 0 2 LUKK KICHINAU 2000 0 0.0 0.0 7 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 13 0.0 0 0 LWSS SKOPJE 1997 0 0.0 0.0 58 0.0 0 0 0 13.9 0.0 0.0 93 0.0 0 0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 61 0.0 1 1 5 0 44.9 0.0 0.0 99 0.0 1 1 6 1999 0 0.0 0.0 15 0.0 0 0-75 0 0.0 0.0 39 0.0 0 0-60 2000 1 0.2 0.2 62 0.6 10 10 307 1 18.1 0.1 0.1 90 0.6 10 10 128 LZBB BRATISLAVA 1997 2 21.0 0.5 0.5 84 1.9 41 41 2 21.0 0.3 0.3 127 1.9 41 41 1998 1 17.8 0.3 0.3 87 1.2 22 22 4-46 -46 1 17.8 0.2 0.2 134 1.2 22 22 5-46 -46 1999 8 27.4 2.2 2.2 133 10.5 289 289 53 1207 1207 7 28.3 1.9 1.9 202 13.9 392 392 51 1675 1675 2000 0 14.0 0.0 0.0 105 0.1 1 1-21 -100-100 0 14.0 0.0 0.0 168 0.1 1 1-17 -100-100 PRR 4 ANNEXES A-15

ANNEX 4: EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY MAPS (EUROPEAN REGIONS) PRR 4 ANNEXES A-16

ANNEX 5: EN-ROUTE ATFM DELAY MAPS (ACC) PRR 4 ANNEXES A-17

States ANNEX 6: COST TABLES The unit rates for 2000 were approved by the enlarged Commission. These unit rates were used to calculate route charges in 2000. Costs in respect of Santa Maria FIR are excluded. National Costs Cost Bases and National Unit Rates for 2000 Eurocontrol Costs Maastricht General (3) Reductions for Exempted s Reduced Cost Base Balance for Year 1998 Costs Chargeable to Users Chargeable Service Units National Unit Rates EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR 1 2a 2b 3 4=1+2-3 5 6=4-5 7 8=6/7 Austria 118 439 000 0 9 669 941 3 084 888 125 024 053-7 978 441 133 002 494 2 100 000 63.33 Belgium-Lux 77 890 896 29 445 979 9 347 600 2 087 107 114 597 368 6 045 843 108 551 525 1 821 000 59.61 Bulgaria 74 588 326 0 4 428 962 60 140 78 957 148 6 374 849 72 582 299 1 256 440 57.77 Croatia (1) 11 943 969 0 669 337 0 12 613 306 0 12 613 306 215 100 58.64 Cyprus 22 234 495 0 1 239 752 289 062 23 185 185 811 272 22 373 914 962 500 23.25 Czech Republic 27 820 513 0 1 833 896 631 500 29 022 908 2 850 584 26 172 325 720 000 36.35 Denmark 66 114 409 0 4 937 127 1 538 811 69 512 725 4 679 342 64 833 383 1 245 000 52.08 France 750 575 297 0 56 188 857 22 500 507 784 263 646 31 843 504 752 420 142 13 834 620 54.39 FYROM (1) 6 465 435 0 495 531 0 6 960 966 0 6 960 966 119 000 58.50 Germany (1) 514 882 173 37 636 244 53 642 756 0 606 161 173 52 581 768 553 579 404 9 150 000 60.50 Greece 97 404 143 0 4 914 940 4 892 547 97 426 536 5 560 533 91 866 003 3 005 000 30.57 Hungary 42 973 528 0 2 277 655 372 979 44 878 204 1 168 616 43 709 588 1 636 400 26.71 Ireland 53 508 000 0 3 409 857 1 394 027 55 523 830 1 648 577 53 875 253 2 611 000 20.63 Italy 403 480 610 0 32 861 281 27 338 002 409 003 889 12 738 214 396 265 675 6 257 050 63.33 Malta 8 461 932 0 419 106 47 667 8 833 371-35 863 8 869 234 264 812 33.49 Netherlands 70 380 645 18 084 787 8 549 449 2 285 699 94 729 181-1 194 088 95 923 270 2 024 000 47.39 Norway 57 577 309 0 4 148 963 204 836 61 521 436-1 778 967 63 300 404 1 308 000 48.39 Portugal 76 348 759 0 4 106 913 1 420 717 79 034 955 2 488 473 76 546 482 2 022 000 37.86 Romania (1) 85 687 940 0 3 760 242 0 89 448 182 857 249 88 590 933 2 225 000 39.82 Slovak Republic 20 410 217 0 1 226 193 145 387 21 491 023 1 260 943 20 230 080 369 549 54.74 Slovenia (1) 9 479 520 0 604 622 0 10 084 142 9 405 900 149 300 63.00 Spain-Canarias 60 578 204 0 3 910 781 766 704 63 722 281 1 541 865 62 180 416 1 418 140 43.85 Spain-Continental 276 067 079 0 19 093 811 8 768 454 286 392 436 4 648 580 281 743 856 6 339 534 44.44 Sweden 108 034 236 0 7 769 481 751 012 115 052 705 5 889 006 109 163 699 2 457 124 44.43 Switzerland 83 787 160 0 7 882 886 1 981 872 89 688 174 2 008 325 87 679 849 1 220 858 71.82 Turkey 140 892 997 0 10 104 147 546 231 150 450 913-3 248 875 153 699 787 3 931 000 39.10 United Kingdom (2) 679 790 619 0 46 416 505 1 614 902 724 592 222-10 442 754 735 034 976 9 016 000 81.53 Grand 3 945 817 411 85 167 010 303 910 581 82 723 051 4 252 171 958 120 318 555 4 131 175 163 77 678 427 53.18 (1) service units. (2) Civil costs and civil service units. Source: Final estimates of the route charges Cost Bases and Unit Rates for 2000 (WP/CE/R/99/58/2667/FIN) PRR 4 ANNEXES A-18

The following data were used to conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis. National Costs States 1996 Actual 1997 Actual 1998 Actual 1999 Actual 2000 Forecast Variation 2000/1999 Avg annual increase 1996-2000 ('000 Euro) ('000 Euro) ('000 Euro) ('000 Euro) ('000 Euro) Austria 105 175 101 318 120 890 120 072 120 215 0.1 3.4 Belgium-Lux. (2) 105 608 108 129 101 321 106 637 113 151 6.1 1.7 Bulgaria 0 0 65 828 67 280 74 588 10.9 Croatia 0 0 7 474 17 352 11 944-31.2 Cyprus 15 334 17 253 18 695 20 335 22 234 9.3 9.7 Czech Republic 21 823 20 587 23 557 32 461 27 821-14.3 6.3 Denmark 46 256 51 016 52 153 58 605 61 153 4.3 7.2 France (3) 679 283 674 825 696 748 729 271 750 575 2.9 2.5 FYROM 0 0 0 6 251 6 465 3.4 Germany (2) 502 650 474 727 471 503 533 345 560 253 5.0 2.7 Greece 58 548 59 237 54 389 101 584 105 391 3.7 15.8 Hungary 25 766 32 194 31 658 36 230 42 974 18.6 13.6 Ireland 41 306 46 225 45 611 48 877 53 508 9.5 6.7 Italy 0 332 353 338 956 390 311 403 481 3.4 Malta 5 607 6 233 7 330 7 567 7 851 3.8 8.8 Netherlands (2) 65 883 74 662 81 692 89 303 88 735-0.6 7.7 Norway 45 836 50 938 53 638 56 879 57 770 1.6 6.0 Portugal Lisboa 52 921 61 968 61 343 71 229 79 717 11.9 10.8 Romania 0 0 71 016 89 796 85 688-4.6 Slovak Republic 0 15 364 17 565 22 301 19 882-10.8 Slovenia 6 325 6 878 8 374 7 611 8 294 9.0 7.0 Spain-Canarias 51 337 51 813 51 296 54 322 63 278 16.5 5.4 Spain-Continental 232 581 232 967 238 676 266 370 304 037 14.1 6.9 Sweden 0 95 748 92 720 105 763 109 749 3.8 Switzerland 86 012 76 114 75 580 80 696 83 208 3.1-0.8 Turkey 125 413 162 265 137 565 165 981 140 893-15.1 3.0 United Kingdom 451 095 558 763 637 946 621 983 718 567 15.5 12.3 EUROCONTROL Costs (1) 1996 Actual 1997 Actual 1998 Actual 1999 Actual 2000 Actual Variation 2000/1999 Avg annual increase 1996-2000 Titre I 232 919 260 077 265 691 279 008 311 378 11.6 7.5 Costs 1996 Actual 1997 Actual 1998 Actual 1999 Actual 2000 Forecast Variation 2000/1999 Avg annual Increase 1996 2000 2 957 679 3 571 658 3 829 213 4 187 419 4 432 800 5.9 10.6 EURO 1996 2 957 679 3 128 193 3 235 654 3 488 365 3 721 002 6.7 5.9 EURO 1999 4 187 419 4 432 800 5.9 (1) Maastricht and CRCO excluded. (2) Maastricht included. (3) Including contribution paid by France to the United Kingdom and Switzerland. Source: Final estimates of the Cost Bases and Unit Rates for 2001(CE/R/00/61/2754/FIN); Final estimates of the route charges Cost Bases and Unit Rate for 2001 (CE/R/00/61/2753/FIN). PRR 4 ANNEXES A-19

ANNEX 7: TOP 30 CAPACITY-CONSTRAINED AIRPORTS (Source: EUROCONTROL AOT) Airport Runway/ taxiway system Constraints (ranked) Terminal/ gates/ Apron Environ ment TMA/CTR/ ATZ Traffic departures ('000) ATFM (min) Co-ord. Airport constraints ranked in order of importance: 1= most important, 4 = least important. 1. AMSTERDAM 3-1 2 214 0.70m Full 2. ATHENS 1 - - 2 93 0.76m Full 3. BALE/ MULHOUSE 2 3 4 1 55 0.20m Co-ord. 4. BARCELONA 1 2 3 4 129 0.32m Full 5. BERLIN TEGEL - 1 - - 66 Full 6. BRUSSELS 2 3 4 1 159 0.21m Full 7. DUSSELDORF - 2 1-96 Full 8. FRANKFURT 1-2 - 231 1.09m Full 9. GENEVA 1 - - 2 73 Full 10. HAMBURG 1 3 2-75 0.06m Co-ord. 11. HERAKLION 2 1 3-22 0.14m Full 12. KERKIRA 2 1 - - 9 No 13. LANZAROTE 1 - - 2 22 Full 14. LISBON 2 1-3 56 Full 15. LONDON GATWICK 1 2 3-130 0.13m Full 16. LONDON HEATHROW 1 2 3-234 0.49m Full 17. LUTON 1 3 4 2 40 No 18. MADRID 1 2 3-181 0.28m Full 19. MANCHESTER 1 2-3 96 Full 20. MILAN MALPENSA 2 3 1-126 0.40m Full 21. MUNICH 1-2 3 157 0.10m Full 22. NICE - - - 1 78 0.06m No 23. OSLO - - 1 101 Co-ord. 24. PARIS ORLY 2 3 1-123 0.08m Full 25. PARIS DE CAULLE - 3-1 261 0.49m Full 26. RHODES - 1 - - 15 No 27. ROME FIUMICINO 2 1 - - 143 Full 28. STUTTGART - 1 2-67 Full 29. VIENNA 1 2 3-102 0.07m Full 30. ZURICH - 3 4 1 158 0.44m Full PRR 4 ANNEXES A-20

ANNEX 8: FOLLOW-UP TO PRC RECOMMENDATIONS PRC recommendations requiring action that have been made to the Provisional Council Note: The numbering assigned to the recommendations listed in this table is for ease of reference only. It does not correlate to the numbering that was used in each of the reference documents listed below. The PRC submitted the following recommendations for action to the Fifth Session of the Provisional Council (PC 5, July 1999). Reference: PC/99/5/3, dated 30.6.99 First Performance Review Report (PRR 1, 1998) PRC Recommendation Provisional Council s Decision Comment 1. The Provisional Council is invited to establish urgently a harmonised safety formance reporting system. 2. The Provisional Council is invited to encourage all States to recognise that the collection of safety data is facilitated by the adoption of no penalty reporting policies. 3. The Provisional Council is invited to request all air traffic service providers concerned to support the PRU and/or the Agency in investigating the root causes of s in the most critical control centres and sectors in Europe. 4. The Provisional Council is invited to request that aircraft oators oating in European airspace, who are in a position to do so, provide OOOI data to the Agency and assist in the development of its use, according to a procedure to be defined under Agency leadership. {Considered under Safety agenda item } The Provisional Council recognised the need to establish urgently a harmonised safety formance reporting system. {Considered under Safety agenda item } The Provisional Council urged all States to adopt no penalty safety incident reporting policies where these were not already in place. The Provisional Council agreed that its Members should request their air traffic service providers to support the PRU and/or the Agency in investigating the root causes of s in the most critical control centres and sectors in Europe on the understanding that the Agency should prepare the text of a standard letter which they could use for this purpose and that the Director General would request ECAC States which are not members of EUROCONTROL to do likewise; The Provisional Council agreed that aircraft oators oating in European airspace, who are in a position to do so, should provide OOOI data to the Agency and assist in the development of its use, according to a procedure to be defined under Agency leadership and requested Member States to take the appropriate steps to ensure compliance on the understanding that the Director General would request ECAC States which are not members of EUROCONTROL to do likewise. SRC approved ESARR 2, which is in force since 01/01/00. SRC pursuing this issue. PRU visited the mostcritical centres and the Agency and obtained an adequate response. OOOI data are now being provided by 5 airlines to CODA on a regular basis. Agency proposal on reporting of air transport punctuality was submitted to PC 9 (November 2000). EU legislation in preparation. PRR 4 ANNEXES A-21

5. The Provisional Council is invited to express full support for the collaborative short and medium term capacity planning processes led by the Agency, with full co-oation of all air traffic service providers concerned, and furthermore to request that this is developed by all air traffic service providers into rolling five- capacity plans. 6. The Provisional Council is invited to request the Agency and concerned States, in addition to initiatives that are being taken by the EUROCONTROL Organisation, to develop top-down airspace designs in the most critical areas in Europe, with the objective of meeting the ATM 2000+ safety objective, and to increase airspace capacity, efficiency and, where possible, costeffectiveness. Priority should be given to up airspace in critical areas, in particular the Area South and Area North identified in PRR 1. 7. 8. The Provisional Council is invited to note that 80 of ATFM s originated up airspace in Summer 1998, reiterates its plea to all concerned parties to ensure timely implementation of RVSM, and encourages early RVSM application where possible. The Provisional Council is invited to request the Agency and concerned ATSPs to sign agreements by mid 2001, which specify agreed up airspace capacity increase profiles upon implementation of RVSM, and attempt to reduce any temporary decrease to the minimum possible. 9. The Provisional Council is invited to encourage air traffic service providers and the CFMU to adopt a more pro-active interaction in order to establish and manage capacity more efficiently. The Provisional Council expressed full support for the collaborative short and medium term capacity planning processes led by the Agency, with full co-oation of all air traffic service providers concerned, and agreed it would examine the issues involved in developing these processes into 5- capacity plans at its 6th Session on the basis of a more detailed proposal. The Provisional Council requested the Agency and the States concerned, in addition to initiatives being taken by EUROCONTROL, to develop airspace designs in the most critical areas in Europe, with the objective of meeting the ATM 2000+ safety objective, and to increase airspace capacity, efficiency and, where possible, cost-effectiveness, with priority being given to up airspace in critical areas, in particular the Area South and Area North identified in PRR 1 on the understanding that it would examine these proposals at its 6th Session. {Both PRC recommendations were taken together by the Provisional Council} The Provisional Council noted that 80 of ATFM s originated up airspace and ground-unlimited sectors in Summer 1998, reiterated its plea to all parties concerned for timely implementation of RVSM, and encouraged early RVSM application where possible taking into the conditions required in the ICAO 70/30 document. The Provisional Council agreed that Member States should request air traffic service providers to adopt a better interaction with the CFMU in order to establish and manage capacity more efficiently, and urged the CFMU to reciprocate accordingly. Done Agency and States concerned taking initiatives e.g. CHIEF and 5-States, meetings of Directors OPS, capacity enhancement function, but more still remains to be done. At its 10 th Session (April 2001) the Provisional Council supported the need for setting up strong capacity planning actions aimed at ensuring that full capacity benefits will be obtained after the implementation of RVSM. In progress. Recommendations of the independent ATFM study were discussed at special EAG in January 2001. DG s conclusions are awaited. PRR 4 ANNEXES A-22