Final Report of the WWF Protected Areas for a Living Planet Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis

Similar documents
Conservation context. -Dinaric Arc-

International Conference on Sustainable Hydropower in the Dinaric Arc 07 Ocober 2009 Hotel Lapad, Dubrovnik, Croatia

Protected Area Gap Analysis

Europe s Living Heart

ECORREGIONAL ASSESSMENT: EASTERN CORDILLERA REAL ORIENTAL PARAMOS AND MONTANE FORESTS

SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN DRAFT ROOF REPORT INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL APPROACH

Terrestrial Protected Area Nomination: Central Mangrove Wetland South-West, Grand Cayman

PARTICULARITIES AND THREATS ON THE BIODIVERSITY FROM CROATIA

ABC o EU i Natura 2000

Sustainable Hydropower in the Dinaric Arc

Ministry of Communications and Transport

Results of the initial evaluation of Protected Area Management in Montenegro using RAPPAM Methodology

Hydropower development in Valbona VALLEY National Park IN Albania

Protecting the Best Places

MAPs sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System

TRANSBOUNDARY ASSESSMENT NP PLITVICE LAKES / NP UNA

Montenegro and Albania cooperate on Lake Skadar

POSi DONi A SPECIAL DINARIC ARC ISSUE. for a living planet R

Balkan Lynx Recovery Programme NEWSLETTER 02/2012

WWF MedPO Dinaric Arc Parks - Team meeting -

Public Lands in Alaska. 200 million acres of federal land - Over 57 Million acres of Wilderness more than half the Wilderness in the entire nation

The Potential of Renewable Energy Sources in Bosnia and Herzegovina

We can help you create effective arguments for PAs through stakeholder consultation

ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT EQUATORIAL PACIFIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Case Study: Conserving Ecological Processes in the Eastern Himalayas

Delivering on CBD commitments: Programme of Work on Protected Areas in Dinaric Arc Ecoregion

Reaching the 2020 Targets with Blue-Green Infrastructure: Member State Perspectives ESTONIA

The Conservation Contributions of Ecotourism Cassandra Wardle

Croatia completes inventory of wetlands

GE020 HERITAGE 07 CONSERVATION. for Hong Kong. by Sami Hasan CBCC CIHE

Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System

The Design of Nature Reserves

Current conditions. Guatemala's Maya Biosphere Reserve. No clear idea of speed of deforestation. Deforestion by pollen analysis

Lake Ohrid. our shared responsibilities and benefits. Protecting

IUCN in Europe: Programme priorities Southeast Europe Members meeting Tirana, 6 March 2013

Transboundary Water Management in Republic of Macedonia

Draft Resolution on wetlands in polar and subpolar regions

Terms of Reference (ToR) for a Short-Term assignment

Project of E-763 Motorway Construction, Section: Belgrade Ostružnica - Požega Boljare/ Border of Montenegro

Nature conservation, protected areas & ecological connectivity

LEAFLET FEBRUARY. WWF-Greater Mekong DAWNA TENASSERIM LANDSCAPE. Wayuphong Jitvijak / WWF-Thailand

IMPACTS OF THE RECENT TSUNAMI ON THE BUNDALA NATIONAL PARK THE FIRST RAMSAR WETLAND IN SRI LANKA

628: BELOVEZHSKAYA PUSHCHA STATE NATIONAL PARK (BELARUS)

Biodiversity and Protected Areas-- Ukraine

Workshop on Guiana Shield Biodiversity Corridor to streamline support for the achievement of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets

Order of the Minister of Environment #39, August 22, 2011 Tbilisi

10 YEARS OF ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY NAŠE PTICE. mr Dražen Kotrošan, Ornithological Society Naše ptice

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG XI.D.2. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds. and

Forms of Natural Protection in Greece

THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECOLOGICAL NETWORK IN SERBIA

VENICE OFFICE - ROSTE

Brown bear (Ursus arctos) fact sheet


SIMULATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AIRSPACE

POST-GRANT ACTIVITIES

Spatial Assessment for the revised Mpumalanga Biodiversity Expansion Strategy. Mervyn Lotter Scientific Services 8 June 2016

Data on Albanian Biodiversity and Mapping

IUCN Red List status of European bees

Ecohydrology of karst poljes and their vulnerability

EUROPEAN UNION STRATEGY FOR THE DANUBE REGION EUSDR. Pillar II Protecting the Environment in the Danube Region

Special nature reserve and ornithological reserve Scope of implementation (local, Local national)

Overview of Protected Areas Management in Nepal. Hari Bhadra Acharya Under Secretary Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Nepal

JUNE JULY 18. VIENNA

Prof. Dr Željko Vaško Doc. Dr Tihomir Predić MSc Boris Marković

Nature Conservation Agency (NCA) Salacgrīva 05/07/2018

Protected Planet and the World Database on Protected Areas

Europe s Living Heart

IV International Symposium Agrosym /AGSY M NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT OF UPPER DANUBE

Coral Reef status in South Asian Seas Region and its possible restoration partnering with other Agencies

REGIONAL AGREEMENT AND FRAMEWORK FOR MARINE MAMMALS CONSERVATION IN THE WCR: THE SPAW PROTOCOL AND THE MARINE MAMMAL ACTION PLAN

Transboundary River Management in the Danube Basin

ANALYSIS OF INADEAUTE WATER QUALITY OD THE RESERVOIR VONARJE/SUTLA LAKE AND POSSIBILITY OF RESTORATION AND UTILIZATION

Danube River Basin District

Draft Resolution on wetlands in polar and subpolar regions

Structured UNiversity mobility between the Balkans and Europe for the Adriatic-ionian Macroregion

4) Data sources and reporting ) References at the international level... 5

IPA cross-border project BALMAS (Ballast water management system for Adriatic sea protection)

Biosphere Reserves of India : Complete Study Notes

Spatial Distribution and Characteristics of At-Risk Species in the Southeast U.S.

Ohrid Lake and Prespa Lake, Sub basin s on Crn Drim river basin International Workshop, Sarajevo, Bosna and Hercegovina May 2009

Drin River Basin: the blue heart of the Balkans... 3

Mediterranean echo NEWSLETTER. Extensive PAs benefit assessment demonstrates value of nature. February

Large Carnivore of the Ukrainian Carpathians

Aquatic insect surveys at Mount Magazine State Park and Hobbs State Park Conservation Area with implementation of an educational component

The Vjosa River in Albania

CROATIAN APPROACH TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NAUTICAL PORTS ON ADRIATIC ISLANDS

STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN MYANMAR. Thein Aung Assistant Director, Nature and Wildlife Conservation Division, Forest Department.

Structured UNiversity mobility between the Balkans and Europe for the Adriatic-ionian Macroregion

Territory Eco-link: large framework, small budget

Uses of maritime space and main conflicts related to MSP implementation in Croatia

Ocho Rios, Jamaica GEF-IWCAM AND IABIN INDICATORS MECHANISM WORKSHOP March TNC s Marine Protected Area Work.

new with purpose PARADISE A Vulnerable white-eye species and the largest tortoise in the world on an ultra-luxe private tropical island

Pinawa Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

Destruction of dolines: the examples from Slovene karst

Managing beyond protected area boundaries: initial findings. Janis Smith Biodiversity Planning Forum 2017 Kruger National Park

Draft LAW. ON SOME AMENDAMENTS IN THE LAW No.9587, DATED ON THE PROTECTION OF BIODIVERSITY AS AMENDED. Draft 2. Version 1.

GREETING FROM GANI BUKA, PRESIDENT OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF DURRES

Delmata Travel / Summer Discover, feel and taste Croatia

Caring for our Lake our Future

Transcription:

Final Report of the WWF Protected Areas for a Living Planet Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis This document is a synthesis of the Final Report of the WWF Protected Areas for a Living Planet Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis carried out by the WWF Mediterranean Programme Office, June- December 2009. It provides a concise overview of the biodiversity of the Dinaric Arc Ecoregion and identifies areas with little or no protection so that more sound management decisions in planning a Protected Area network can be made.

Acknowledgements WWF would like to acknowledge the contributions of the following: Regional Scientific Coordinators: Peter Glasnović, BSc; Boris Krystufek, PhD; Andrej Sovinc, MSc. Cartography: Mileta Bojović, BSc. National Scientific Coordinators: Genti Kromidha, PhD, Institute for Nature Conservation (INCA), Albania; Senka Barudanović, PhD, University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Irina Zupan, MSc, State Institute for Nature Protection, Croatia; Dragan Roganović, PhD, Institute for Nature Protection, Montenegro; Leon Kebe, BSc, Krajinski park Radensko polje, Slovenia. External experts: Boris Sket, PhD; Maja Zagmaister, PhD; Borut Štumberger, BSc; Matt Merrifield, PhD. Project partners: Euronatur; TNC (The Nature Conservancy); University of Primorska, Slovenia. In Bosnia and Herzegovina: Dragan Kovačević, Banja Luka; Dejan Kulijer, Sarajevo; Ozren Laganin, Banja Luka; Tihomir Predić, MSc, Banja Luka; Dragan Rončević, National Park Kozara; Ivica Udovičić, Sarajevo; Branko Vučijak, PhD, Sarajevo. WWF Mediterranean Programme Office: Director of Conservation Deni Porej, PhD Project Leader Stella Šatalić, MSc Project Assistant Ivana Korn Design and layout Catherine Roberts The Final Report of the WWF Protected Areas for a Living Planet Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis, attached to this document as a cd, was compiled by: Peter Glasnović, BSc Boris Krystufek, PhD Andrej Sovinc, MSc Mileta Bojović, BSc Deni Porej, PhD Proofreading: Marija Sabljak The WWF Protected Areas for a Living Planet Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project benefits from the support of the MAVA Foundation. Produced by WWF Mediterranean Programme, June 2010. For further information see www.panda.org/mediterranean or contact ssatalic@wwfmedpo.org

What is special about the Dinaric Arc Ecoregion? The world is becoming increasingly aware of the importance of the Dinaric Arc region as one of Europe s biodiversity hotspots. An extraordinarily fragmented landscape, diverse geological composition, the impacts of different climate types and the invasion of neighbouring biogeographical territories have all contributed to the high biodiversity of the area. This has also been favoured by relatively slow economic development and predominantly traditional agricultural practices. Extensive and well-preserved forests still cover a great part of the area, offering shelter to significant resident populations of large carnivores including the brown bear, lynx and wolf. The region extends from its border with the Alps in Slovenia through Croatia and a large part of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro, ending in the north of Albania, and is characterised by a central mountain range that extends into Serbia, Kosovo and Macedonia. The whole Dinaric Arc region is characterised by karst phenomena. Water erosion transformed carbonate bedrock into surface and underground karst features, home to some unique species, including the endemic cave salamander Proteus anguinus. The cave system represents the largest underground river system in Europe and is therefore an extremely important source of water for the entire region. Prokletje, Albania. Genti Kromidha / WWF-Mediterranean The warm Mediterranean climate has had a significant impact on the diversity of flora and fauna in the Dinaric Arc. Habitats which differ dramatically can be found within short distances. Freshwater environments have been greatly affected by human activity, which has changed both the geomorphological and the biodiversity aspect of rivers. A large number of endemic species inhabit the rivers of the Adriatic basin, and there is a high concentration of endemic species in the region as a whole: the Dinaric vole, certain lizards, the cave salamander, many invertebrates and a number of plant species that have found refuge in the shelter of rocks, especially in river valleys and mountains.

The gap analysis: towards a new perspective on protected areas The WWF Programme of Work on Protected Areas Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project recently completed a protected areas gap analysis for the region. One of the most important aspects of the gap analysis is that it provides a new broader perspective of the region s biodiversity which, so far, has been investigated only at national scales. By identifying areas with little or no protection, more sound management decisions in planning a protected area network can be made. The gap analysis compares the biodiversity distribution with current protected area systems, in order to identify areas where species and ecosystems are unprotected or under-protected. The quality of data available for this analysis differs greatly from country to country. Not all countries were able to provide comprehensive and accurate data, and this was compensated for with modelling. The data used in the gap analysis are representative at the regional level. Various scholars have divided the region into several bio-geographical subunits, mainly running from the northwest to the southwest. For the purpose of the gap analysis country input data were used which did not provide any biogeographical information but enabled appropriate analyses and comparison of current protected area systems. The gap analysis is based on three main data sets: spatial orientation of various habitats, the distribution of biodiversity components and mapping of areas already protected. Target species and habitats that are not adequately represented in protected areas are considered as gaps. For this purpose, the gap was defined as those cases in which less than 10% of a target surface area (the IUCN threshold) is represented in a protected area. Targets that are not represented at all were considered as total gaps. Targets represented by more then 10% in protected areas were considered as covered. On a regional level, 157 biodiversity targets were identified. The analysis showed that the IUCN threshold portion of land under protected areas has not been achieved in any of the countries studied. Skadar Lake National Park, Montenegro. Vasilije Busković / WWF-Mediterranean

Analysis of each biodiversity target indicates that: in Albania 97 targets were identified in Albania, of which 38 (41.2%) were identified as gaps and 5 (5.2%) as total gaps. 54 targets (53.6%) are adequately covered by protected areas, which amounts to almost 1,280km 2 (9.86%) of the Dinaric terrestrial part of Albania. The great majority of protected areas occur in the lowlands. At the time the gap analysis was completed, there were no marine protected areas in Albania. in Bosnia and Herzegovina The least protected area in the region is Bosnia and Herzegovina. Only 1,083km 2 (2.63%) of the area within the ecoregion is currently protected. Out of 111 targets identified in the country, 79 (71.2 %) of them indicated gaps and 21 (18.9%) total gaps. Only 11 targets (9.9%) can be considered as adequately covered by protected areas. Gaps occur evenly in all analysed groups of targets. There are no marine protected areas on the small portion of the Bosnia and Herzegovina coastline. in Croatia A total of 133 targets were identified in Croatia. 78 targets (58.6%) are adequately covered by protected areas, 52 (39.1%) result as a gap and 3 (2.3%) as a total gap. According to results, the system of terrestrial protected areas of Croatia should be considered effective for the protection of biodiversity. However, some important gaps were identified. The Croatian protected area system adequately covers land at higher altitudes, while lowlands and hilly areas (between 0 and 600m.a.s.l.) are not adequately covered. This is also true for the gaps which predominantly occur in lowland targets. Evergreen forests of the coastal areas and higher mountain areas are adequately covered. Forests of lower hilly areas are not. Karstic fields, which are widely distributed in the country and are of vital importance for biodiversity, are not adequately covered by protected areas. Gaps were identified among reptile species, especially those occurring in the warmest lowland areas. Significant gaps relating to freshwater fish, the great majority of which are endemic, were also identified. in Slovenia Targets are not fully covered in Slovenian protected areas. Of a total of 85 targets identified in Slovenia, only 15 (17.6%) are adequately covered by protected areas, 68 (80%) result as a gap and 2 (2.4%) as a total gap. Gaps occur equally in all analysed groups of targets. in Montenegro 109 targets were identified in Montenegro, of which 60 (55%) indicate gaps, 15 (14%) total gaps, and 34 could be considered as adequately covered by protected areas. A little over 1,000km 2 (6.2%) of the land area in the Dinaric Arc part of the country is protected. Even though the majority of protected areas occur in the lowlands, a great number of lowland targets indicate gaps. This is because lakes and wetland surface areas have major shares in the protected area system. Gaps are equally distributed in all groups of targets. Only high mountain targets are relatively well covered by protected areas. There are no marine protected areas in Montenegro. It must be noted that the Montenegrin National Park of Prokletije was established after this analysis had started and is not included. This park will significantly improve the protected area system in Montenegro.

In the future The analysis showed that the level of protected area designations in the Dinaric Arc is not sufficient to ensure adequate biodiversity protection for the region. Only in the terrestrial areas of Croatia has the IUCN 10% threshold portion of protected land surface been achieved. Marine protected areas in the whole region fall far below the threshold. Bosnia and Herzegovina, with its central role in connecting biodiversity between the north and south Dinaric Arc, almost completely lacks a system of protected areas with respective corridors. The lack of adequate data indicates a future investment in compiling field inventories for a full understanding of the biodiversity of the area. This is particularly true for biodiversity hotspots. The geographic characteristics of the Dinaric Arc indicate that the region will be seriously influenced by anticipated climate change. Higher temperatures with longer periods of drought will cause disruption to natural communities, with the extinction of populations and species. Since the region is characterised by high geomorphological diversity it is also expected that changes in the altitudinal distribution of species and habitats will occur. Changes in climate, together with the developing infrastructure, will create (and are already creating) favourable conditions for the arrival and acclimatisation of new alien and invasive animal and plant species. Climatic changes will also affect marine ecology. The impacts of temperature changes on phytoplankton populations as primary biomass producers will trigger subsequent changes at all food chain levels. Škocjan Caves Regional Park, Slovenia. Borut Lozej / WWF-Mediterranean

Conclusions With less than 3% of its surface area adequately covered by protected areas, Bosnia and Herzegovina with its central role in connecting biodiversity is in urgent need of a protected area system. Biodiversity at lower altitudes in Montenegro and Albania is inadequately protected, mainly due to the large portion of one ecosystem type in the protected area system (Skadar/Schkoder Lake and the coastal lagoons in Albania). In Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina lowlands are not adequately represented in the protected area systems, while habitats at higher altitudes throughout the region can be considered as adequately represented. The highest gap relates to habitats between 200 and 1400m.a.s.l. which, together with the lowlands, are subject to the highest human pressures. At a regional level the majority of forest types are not adequately represented. Only evergreen forests and scrub, thermophilous beech forests, coastal flooded forests of ash and common oak and shrubs of mountain pine are adequately represented. High mountain grasslands ( rudine ), thermophilous grasslands and karstic fields with surface hydrology were identified as gaps. Other terrestrial habitats are adequately represented within protected areas. Cave biodiversity is under-represented in the protected area systems. More comprehensive and focused research is required to define the full value of this biodiversity component which is extremely important for the entire region. Inland mountains are areas particularly rich in small terrestrial mammals. Gaps were identified for these equally throughout the entire region. The most significant reptile hotspots are along the Adriatic coast, most influenced by the warm and dry Mediterranean climate. Gaps were identified for most of the islands. Areas with the highest diversity of amphibian species were identified in the central Dinaric part of Slovenia, in northern Croatia and in the mountains of eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Albania. Gaps are equally distributed throughout the region. Kornati National Park and Telašćica Nature Park, Croatia. Velid Jakupović / WWF-Mediterranean

No detailed maps of nesting birds were available. The importance of karst poljes for nesting and migrating bird populations were analysed. Only in Slovenia were these extremely important habitats and characteristic landscape features found to be adequately protected. Again, the greatest gap was identified in Bosnia and Herzegovina where only three important bird sites were adequately protected. On a regional level, important bird sites are protected. Una National Park, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sanjin Jušić / WWF-Mediterranean Areas rich in freshwater fish were identified in the river systems of Dalmatia and south Bosnia and Herzegovina, particularly the rivers Krka, Cetina and Neretva. All identified areas are under high pressure from human activities. On a regional level all of the most important areas for freshwater fish are under-represented within current protected area systems. Major gaps in the protection of large mammals were identified in Slovenia and in Bosnia and Herzegovina, where no species is adequately covered. Planned infrastructure will further fragment the ranges of populations of large carnivores Concerning marine biodiversity, insufficient data related to marine ecosystems in the entire project area indicate that significant research is needed to address the information gap. In Croatia, marine protected areas cover a little more than 3% of the surface area. There are no marine protected areas in Montenegro and Albania. Although marine protected areas in Croatia are insufficient, it was found that some identified targets were adequately represented within them. Coastal habitats are adequately covered within terrestrial protected areas. Why we are here. WWF s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature. 1986 Panda symbol WWF - World Wide Fund for Nature WWF Registered Trademark