DECISIONS OF Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission VOLUME 33 HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 1958
TABLE OF CASES A Page Altoona-Pittsburgh Freight Line, Joseph R. Prostko t/d/b/a, Application of 66 _Ambridge Taxicab Company v Ambridge Yellow Cab Company 202 Atchison, Robert, for himself and on behalf of the Westland Citizens Water Committee v. Westland Water Company 466 B Bacco Coach Lines (Bacco Transit Company), Gust Siahos and Peter. Sampas, Co-Partners, t/d/b/a McKeesport Transit Company v 469 Bally Case and Cooler Company v. Reading Transportation Company 195 Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, et al., Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v 344 Barder, John H., et al. v. Lykens Borough Water Department 760 Beallsville Telephone Company, Centerville Telephone Company v. 391 Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania., Application of 29 Bender, Lloyd F., et al. v. Fayetteville Water Company, et al 459 Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, et al. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company 515, 739 C Centerville Telephone Company v. Beallsville Telephone Company 391 Citizens Water Company of Washington, Pa.., Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, et al. v. 568 Commonwealth Telephone Company, Maurice S. -Whitlock, et al. v 257 Cowden Water Company, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Anthony Secreet, et al. v. 33 Cunningham, H. C., v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company 146 D Delaware, Lackawanna and -Western Railroad Company, Application of... 197 Delaware River Port Authority, Application of 92, 138, 187 Department of Highways of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Application of 246, 342, 631 Department of Highways, et al. of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. 6 Dinner, W. J., Transfer Company, Application of 472 Diliner, W. J., Transfer Company, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. 755 Duquesne Light. Company, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. et al. v. 149 E Ellwood City, Borough of, and Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company 750 Equitable Gas Company, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, City of Pittsburgh v 16. 264 Equitable tins II( ights usi No. S94---Veterans of Foreign Wars i.'. 556
Pennsylvania. Electric Company, Application of 396 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, et al. v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, et al. 344 Citizens Water Company of Washington, Pa. 568 Department of Highways, et al. 6 W. J. Dillner Transfer Company 755 Duquesne Light Company 149 Harrisburg Suburban Water Company 772 Manufacturers Light and Heat Company 529, 669 Philadelphia Transportation Company 165 South Pittsburgh Water Company 523 Pennsylvania. Public Utility Commission, Anthony Secreet, et al. v. Cowden Water Company 33 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, City of Pittsburgh v. Equitable Gas Company 16, 264 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Galen H. Fries v. Reading Bus Company 369 Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Application of 3, 14, 661 Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Borough of Oakmont, J. M. Lewis, et al. v. 45 Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, et al. v. 515, 739 Pennsylvania Railroad Company, H. C. Cunningham v. 146 Peterson, J. W. et al., Co-Partners, t/d/b/a Turnpike Express, Application of 561 Philadelphia Electric Company, Application of 136, 446, 751 Philadelphia Transportation Company, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. 165 Philadelphia Transportation Company, Application of 79 Philadelphia Suburban Water Company, Application of 762 Phoenixville, Borough of, Water Department, Supervisors of Upper Providence Township, Montgomery County v. 461 Pittsburgh Railways Company, Application of 1, 559 Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company and Ellwood City, Borough of 750 Pittsburgh, City of, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Equitable Gas Company 264 Pittsburgh Stores Fast Freight, A. Kohrman, I. J. Sheer and J. A. Feldmeier, Application of 162 Platt, Robert and City of Scranton v. Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Company 204 Pleasant View Water Company, Pennsylvania. Public Utility Commission v 54 Pricedale, Village of, Citizens of, Westmoreland County, Rostraver Township Supervisors v. Pricedale Water Company 456 Prostko, Joseph R., t/d/b/a Altoona-Pittsburgh Freight Line, Application of 66, 765
viii TABLE OF CASES Page Rostraver Township Supervisors, Westmoreland County, Citizens of the Village of Pricedale v. Pricedale Water Company 456 Rubin Bus Lines, Application of 360 Scranton, City of, and Robert Platt v. Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Company 204 Secreet, Anthony, et al., Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Cowden Water Company 33 Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Company, Robert Platt and City of Scranton v. 204 South Pittsburgh Water Company, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, et al. v 523 Southwestern Pennsylvania Water Authority, High House Civic Association by M. F. Franks and Faye Matthews, trustees a.d litem v 748 Summerhill Water Company, Applications of 451 Turnpike Express, J. W. Peterson, et al. Co-Partners, t/d/b/a, Application of 561 Upper Providence Township, Montgomery County, Supervisors of v. Water Department, Borough of Phoenixville 461 V Valley Freight Lines, Inc., and Keystone-Lawrence Transfer and Storage Company v. Weston Hauling, Inc 656 Washington., Pennsylvania, Citizens Water Company of, Pennsylvania. Public Utility Commission, et al. v. 568 Weaver Warehouses, Inc., Fidelity 20th Century Transportation Company, et al v 183 Wellsville, Addison & Galeton Railroad Corporation, Application of 664 Western Union Telegraph Company, Securities Certificate of 395 Westland Water Company, Robert Atchison, for himself a.nd on behalf of the Westland Citizens -Water Committee v 466 Westmoreland County, Rostraver Township Supervisors, Citizens of the Village of Pricedale v. Pricedale Water Company 456 West Newton, Borough of, et al. v. -West Newton Water Company of West Newton, Pa. 21 Weston Hauling, Inc., Valley Freight Lines, Inc., and Keystone-Lawrence Transfer & Storage Company v 656 White Oak Borough Authority, Application of 438 White Transit Company, City of Wilkes-Barre v 758 Whitlock, Maurice S., et al. v. Commonwealth Telephone Company 257 ork Telephone and Telegraph Company, Inc-wiry and Investigation upon Commission Motion into Telephone service and facilii ies of 400