Level Crossing Risk Assessment Polegate MCB

Similar documents
Thank you for your of 1st June You requested the following information:

2.2 USER CENSUS DATA A site census estimated on 19/01/2016, together with Sky high 9 day census March 2014.

Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub

Laxon Terrace - Sarawia. Click to add title. Street Rail Level Crossing. Public Forum. December

There are no planned or apparent developments near the crossing which may lead to a change or increase in use or risk.

Road-Rail Interface Safety

Transport Assessment Appendix M: Avonmouth Impacts

Cuadrilla Elswick Ltd

STIRLING TO KINCARDINE RE-OPENING OF LINE

Smart Motorways Programme

Chapter 16 Route Window NE15 Brentwood station. Transport for London

London Borough of Barnet Traffic & Development Design Team

Summary Delivery Plan Control Period 4 Delivery Plan More trains, more seats. Better journeys

PUBLIC INQUIRY APPLICATION BY NEWTWORK RAIL UNDER TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL SUFFOLK LEVEL CROSSING REDUCTION ORDER

Chapter 6 Route Window NE5 Seven Kings station. Transport for London

Queen s Circus Roundabout

Passive Level Crossings. Crossings where users are in control of their actions

Today we are showing you the early designs to improve the A27 at Arundel and we would like to hear your views on our options.

The case for a local rail station. At Great Blakenham, Suffolk.

Felixstowe Branch Line FAQ

Level Crossing Interface Requirements

Rail Update Station Usage Statistics and Network Rail Performance

John Betts School Crossing Review

Project No Brent Cross, Cricklewood London, UK Phase 1A North RMA

A303. Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Preferred Route Announcement

Scotchbarn Lane, Prescot Accessibility Statement

Saighton Camp, Chester. Technical Note: Impact of Boughton Heath S278 Works upon the operation of the Local Highway Network

Seek the Board s approval for the Donald Place kerb and channel renewal to progress to final design, tender and construction; and

Sky Temporary Car Park Transport Statement

Module TS9. Level crossings - signallers regulations. GE/RT8000/TS9 Rule Book. Issue 3. March 2014

Document Control Identification. Document History. Authorisation. Rail Safety Manager Brookfield Rail

Near miss at Ballymurray level crossing on the 14 th of June between Athlone and Westport. Report (issued 11 th of May 2009)

East Sussex Strategic Partnership Transport Update 2 March Jon Wheeler Team Manager Strategic Economic Infrastructure

Module TW8. Level crossings - drivers instructions. GE/RT8000/TW8 Rule Book. Issue 7. September 2015

Harts Drove UWCM level crossing provides Access to worksite / leisure area from facility.

Open Report on behalf of Richard Wills, Executive Director for Environment and Economy

All queries and paragraph references, as set out in red below, relate to Mark Brunnen s Proof of Evidence (NR27/1).

Llandudno Junction. Regeneration Proposals for the Future. December 2009

Chapter 8 Route Window NE7 Chadwell Heath station. Transport for London

Handbook 18. Handbook 18. Duties of a level crossing attendant. GE/RT8000/HB18 Rule Book

HERNE BAY AREA MEMBER PANEL 16 TH JANUARY This report is open to the public.

Update on the Thameslink programme

Cabinet. The Future of Wareham Foot Level Crossing. Date of Meeting 24 February 2016

lighting road markings Part 2 td 89/08 use of passively safe signposts, lighting columns and traffic signal posts to bs en 12767: 2007

PORTABLE LIGHT SIGNALS

Issue 8. Module TW8. Level crossings - drivers instructions. GERT8000-TW8 Rule Book

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content

12, 14 and 16 York Street - Amendments to Section 16 Agreement and Road Closure Authorization

Date: 11 th January, From: Plaistow & Ifold Parish Neighbourhood Plan - Steering Group. Plaistow & Ifold Parish Council

SUTTON UNDER WHITESTONECLIFFE PARISH COUNCIL

GK/GN0692. Guidance on Level Crossing Interface Requirements. Rail Industry Guidance Note for GK/RT0192. Published by

Park and Ride Update. Committee. Strategy and Programmes. Date of meeting 29 November 2013 Date of report 6 November 2013

Proposals for the Harrogate Road / New Line Junction Improvement Scheme. August / September Supported by:

Chapter 2 Route window W25 Maidenhead station. Transport for London

HEAD OF ECONOMIC PROMOTION AND PLANNING Nathan Spilsted, Senior Planning Officer Tel:

M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart motorway

9.1 INTRODUCTION 9.2 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. Southern Cross University

Requirements for Level Crossings

Map showing location of public transport projects in vicinity of railway station

Appendix A: Summary of findings drawn from an analysis of responses to the questionnaire issued to all households in Trimley St Martin

Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 27 August 2008 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager

Commissioning Director - Environment. Officer Contact Details Jane Shipman;

Airdrie - Bathgate Railway and Linked Improvements Bill. Environmental Statement Page 1

1. To inform members of the views of the West of England Joint Scrutiny Committee (JSC) following a meeting held on Wednesday 5 th March 2014

Report To: Scrutiny Committee Date: 1 March Claire Onslow Head of Tourism & Economic Development

All reports. 1. Governance Service receive draft report Name of GSO DPR

Chicago St. Louis High-Speed Rail. Braidwood Construction. Local Officials Briefing August 7, 2014

FASI(N) IoM/Antrim Systemisation Airspace Change Decision

Dyke Road Cycle and Pedestrian Improvements 14/02/2014 Reference number PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AND GUARDRAILING ASSESSMENT

Lower Thames Crossing

The Network Rail (Suffolk Level Crossing Reduction) Order

Wales. Andy Thomas. Route Managing Director Wales. Ken Skates, Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Infrastructure, Welsh Government

Chapter 4 Route window W23 Taplow station. Transport for London

Manual vs. Automatic Operation and Operational Restrictions

WORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY. Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World

WELCOME WELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC EXHIBITION FOR THE BOND STREET PUBLIC REALM PROJECT.

HIGHWAY RAIL GRADE CROSSING CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM

Sarawia Street Laxon Terrace Rail Level Crossing Removal

Ermine Street Environmental Enhancements

Appendix 6 Fulbourn Greenway Review

Guildford Borough Transport Strategy 2017, Topic Paper: Transport, June 2017 (accompanying Local Plan 2017) Local Plan Transport Strategy 2017

TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 THE TRANSPORT AND WORKS (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) RULES 2004 THE NETWORK RAIL (SUFFOLK LEVEL CROSSING REDUCTION) ORDER

COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS

Parking Amendments - Bay Street, between Harbour Street and Queens Quay West (York Street, Bay Street, and Yonge Street Ramp Removal)

THIRTEENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

Ridership Growth Strategy (RGS) Status Update

East Sussex Rail Strategy Shaping Rail in East Sussex and Action Plan

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 20 February 2013 Report of Handling by Development Quality Manager

M2 Junction 5. improvements scheme. Preferred route announcement

Proposed Lidl Food store West Hendford, Yeovil

Appendix 8 Sawston Greenway Review

an engineering, safety, environmental, traffic and economic assessment of each option to inform a preferred route option choice; 3) Development and as

Chapter 12 Route window W15 Dog Kennel bridge. Transport for London

ACORNS PROJECTS LIMITED

Chapter 4 Route Window NE3 Manor Park station. Transport for London

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS WITHIN BIRMINGHAM

PART VIII APPLICATION FOR REVISED SOUTH SIDE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT WORKS TO FACILITATE LUAS BXD PLANNING REPORT ROADS & TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT

Pedestrian Safety Review Spadina Avenue

2.2 For these reasons the provision of tourist signing will only be considered:

22-24 Station Road, Erdington, Birmingham, B23 6UB

Transcription:

Level Crossing Risk Assessment Polegate MCB Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 1

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Background 3 1.2 Reason for the risk assessment 3 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE 4 2.1 Crossing details 4 2.2 Environment 6 2.3 Future developments 9 2.4 Incident history over the last 5 years 10 3 OPTION ASSESSMENT 11 3.1 Residual risks 11 3.2 Option Selection 12 4 APPROVALS 13 Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 2

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background This document provides the necessary supporting safety information to a decision making process for the renewal of Polegate MCB level crossing, leading to recommendations as to the most suitable level crossing option that reduces the risk to as low as reasonably practicable. This report includes the necessary risk assessment to support the chosen option. 1.2 Reason for the risk assessment This risk assessment has been produced in conjunction with the East Sussex Resignalling project which will see the abolition of Polegate Signalbox and the renewal of Polegate MCB Crossing. This document demonstrates the decision making undertaken in determining the practicability of this proposal and the evaluation of the necessary safety measures required at the level crossing; culminating in a single preferred option. This document is derived from and fulfils the guidance criteria stipulated. The signalling renewal works associated with this project, East Sussex re-signalling, is driven by asset condition, safety and obsolescence. The project is also part of the National Operating Strategy (NOS) scheme which will achieve the signalling renewal and the Control Period 4 (CP4) operating strategy objectives through the resignalling of the East Sussex line. The scope of the project includes the abolition of 5 mechanical Signal Boxes, Berwick, Polegate, Hampden Park, Pevensey and Westham and Bexhill. The project will also close the manned gate box at Havensmouth and re control the existing Eastbourne area to a new workstation which will be situated in the new Three Bridges Operating Centre. The project is also looking at line speed improvements where existing Permanent Speed Restrictions are present between Glynde and Hampden Park. Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 3

2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE 2.1 Crossing details Down side crossing approach Up side crossing approach Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 4

2.1 Crossing Details cont d Crossing Name Crossing Type Strategic Route Network Rail Line of Route Engineers Line Reference (ELR) Mileage OS Grid Reference Post Code Road Name (type) Local Authority Supervising Signalbox Electrification (type) Number of Running Lines Line Speed at Crossing Maximum Permissible Line Speed Polegate MCB Sussex Keymer Junction to Eastbourne KJE3 19m 35ch TQ582048 BN26 6AQ Unclassified - High Street East Sussex County Council Polegate 3 rd Rail DC Two 90mph 90mph Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 5

2.2 Environment Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 6

a) approaches Polegate MCB is of a single carriageway in each direction of travel. The carriageways are clearly defined with central road markings painted up to and including over the level crossing. The width of each carriageway approach remains consistent throughout and this is continued across Polegate MCB itself. There are no significant gradients present on either side of the level crossing which could be considered detrimental to the stopping of traffic. Polegate MCB is situated on an unclassified road High Street and is situated adjacent to Polegate Railway Station. High Street Polegate links the A22 to the A27. b) Local properties, businesses and amenities Polegate MCB is situated in a rural/urban area with residential properties and a mixture off retail outlets on both sides of the crossing. There are also local schools within the area. c) Rail approach and usage Polegate MCB level crossing is located on the line of route known as the Keymer Junction to Eastbourne line. The permissible line speed at this location is 90mph on both lines. The maximum permissible line speed is 90mph. The level of service over the crossing is normally 8 trains per hour, 4 to Lewes and 4 to Eastbourne. There is no booked freight on this line with services being electric passenger services operated by Southern Trains. Future Control of Polegate MCB Following the abolition of 5 mechanical Signal Boxes, Berwick, Polegate, Hampden Park, Pevensey and Westham and Bexhill, closure of the manned gate box at Havensmouth and the re control the existing Eastbourne area to a new workstation which will be situated in the new Three Bridges Operating Centre. This workstation will also be responsible for the supervision of 4 MCB OD, 2 CCTV and 4 AHB crossings. A full ergonomics study was undertaken in August 2011 which concluded that the existing signalling controls of the Berwick, Polegate, Hampden Park, Pevensey and Westham, Bexhill, Havensmouth and Eastbourne could be transferred to the new Three Bridges Operating Centre. This ergonomics study however was based on the Signaller having operation of 3 MCB OD, 3 CCTV and 4 AHB crossings. The ergonomics study will be revisited once final design is complete. Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 7

Sectional Appendix Extract Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 8

2.3 Future developments There are no future developments planned in the Berwick MCB area. Network Rail continues to monitor planning applications and will review the risks at Berwick should things change Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 9

2.4 Incident history over the last 5 years The following table details the incident number and type known to have occurred at Polegate MCB level crossing within the past 5 years. Incident date Fataities Collisions Barrier strikes Near misses Other 30/11/2007 02/05/2008 15/08/2009 Person vaulted the barriers MOP tripped on crossing Taxi zig zagged around barriers 04/01/2010 White van struck barrier 24/01/2010 21/07/2010 19/11/2010 4 youths climbed over barriers MOP walked off the end of platform MOP on crossing refused to move 28/09/2011 Mobility scooter struck barrier 20/12/2011 Bus struck barrier male walked across in front of stationary train when barriers were down not a near miss 0 0 3 0 7 There have been a number of red light violations, and MOP jumping the barriers which are listed above under misuse. There have been no reported near misses. There has been 1 reported accident at this location which involved a tripping accident on the crossing. Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 10

3 OPTION ASSESSMENT 3.1 Residual risks Polegate MCB level crossing was risk assessed on the 22 nd June 2010 in accordance with the approved company standards and processes. The collected data set derived (inclusive of thirty minute census) was fully evaluated by the All Level Crossing Risk Model (ALCRM). The ALCRM evaluation for Polegate is an individual risk score of F and a collective risk score of 2 based upon the collection data set defined above; F2.* The key risk drivers identified by the toolset and which contribute toward this risk score are: Crossing near station Large number of users The census carried out in June 2010 translated into an expected average of 6885 vehicular movements and 2214 pedestrian movements per day over the level crossing. For later comparison, a full 9-day census was undertaken. The survey covered the period Saturday, 15 January 2011 to Sunday, 23 January 2011 inclusive. The survey hours were scheduled as 06 00 to 24 00 hours daily. The results of the 9-day survey are shown in the table below:- The Nationwide Data Collection service who undertook the survey observed the following busiest times: For vehicles the busiest quarter hourly period occurred at 1700-1715 hours on Thursday 20 th January 2011 222 vehicles. For pedestrians the busiest quarter hourly period occurred at 1515-1530 hours on Monday 17 th January 2011 50 Adult pedestrians and 103 unaccompanied children. Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 11

3.2 Option Selection The table below affords a summary of the options considered*, the safety reductions achieved and the benefit to cost ratio applicable to each. * The options listed are not ordered by preference. * Cost benefit analysis has been undertaken within ALCRM for comparable purposes; third party funding agreed in principle for delivery. Option ALCRM Risk Score ALCRM FWI Safety Benefit FWI Cost Benefit Cost Ratio Comments MCB Manually Controlled F2 MCB-CCTV H3 0.007348328 0.00814534 2,000,000 0.08 MCB-OD (obstacle detection system) H3 0.005878662 0.009620309 2,000,000 0.09 Closure by bridging M13 0.0 0.015520182 20,000,000 0.02 This option would require the attention of the Signaller at Three Bridges Operating Centre to operate the barrier controls. This option would be automatic and would only require the Signaller at Three Bridges Operating Centre to monitor the barrier controls. This option would eradicate delay to users of Polegate MCB and also nullify all associated risk drivers attributed to the level crossing. Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 12

The upgrade of Polegate MCB level crossing to type approved full barrier MCB-OD is the single option selected for progression following evaluation. This option is considered to represent the greatest cumulative benefit when taking account of safety risk, risk reduction and cost benefit. Informed decision making With closure and bridging discounted through lack of business justification, the upgrading of the level crossing to MCB OD was considered. MCB-OD will have the facility to record red light jumpers registration numbers which will reduce the misuse at this location. It was noted that there were differences in the levels of traffic and pedestrians recorded in ALCRM and that of the 9 day census. 4 APPROVALS Prepared By: Date: 02 April 2013 Approved By: Signature: Job Title: Project Operations Interface Specialist Signature: Job Title: Operations Risk Advisor Date: 29 May 2013 Approved By: Date: 29 May 2013 Signature: Job Title: Signal & Telecoms Maintenance Engineer Polegate MCB Level Crossing Risk Assessment 13