Terms of Referece for the Fial Evaluatio of the Empowerig Local ad Natioal Humaitaria Actors (ELNHA) project 06 July 2018 Terms of referece Program/project title /affiliate idetificatio code Geographical coverage Empowerig Local ad Natioal Humaitaria Actors (ELNHA) Bagladesh, Ugada, Global level Program/project lifespa 01 Jauary 2016 31 December 2018 Program/project budget 7,343,603 Evaluatio commissioig maager Evaluatio maager ELNHA Global Programme Maager ELNHA Global MEAL Officer 1. Backgroud These are the Terms of Referece (ToR) for the fial evaluatio of the Empowerig Local ad Natioal Humaitaria Actors (ELNHA) project implemeted by Oxfam Novib ad Oxfam Great Britai. ELNHA is a threeyear iitiative edig i December 2018, fuded by the Ikea Foudatio for a total amout of 7,343,603. The ELNHA project aims at a better sharig of power ad resources i the humaitaria sector betwee iteratioal humaitaria actors ad local ad atioal oes. The uderlyig assumptio is that havig local ad atioal humaitaria actors (LNHA) i the drivig seat for emergecy preparedess ad respose shall allow vulerable people i disaster proe areas to beefit from better humaitaria respose. To achieve the evisioed systemic chage i the humaitaria sector, the ELNHA project is pursuig three mai strategies i parallel. First of all, the capacity of LNHA is stregtheed so that they ca lead humaitaria actio (STRENGTH). Secodly, LNHA are give the voice to create a strog domestic humaitaria ageda i their coutries (VOICE). Thirdly, iteratioal NGOs ad doors are iflueced, based o solid evidece, so that they provide more space ad meas to LNHA to lead humaitaria actio (SPACE). ELNHA focuses o two coutries, Bagladesh ad Ugada, which are both acutely at risk from humaitaria crises. I both coutries, activities are udertake at atioal level ad i selected districts (6 i Ugada ad 9 i Bagladesh). The ELNHA project started with a aalysis of the domestic humaitaria capacity i Bagladesh ad Ugada, usig the HUCOCA (Humaitaria Coutry Capacity Aalysis) methodology. This was followed by the joit prioritizatio by LNHA of their capacity developmet eeds ad the drawig of joit actio plas. Oe mechaism used for buildig stregth is ELNHA s Humaitaria Capacity Developmet Fud (HCDF), to which local actors ca submit oce per year proposals to fud capacity developmet activities. Voice is promoted both at the collective ad orgaizatioal levels: coordiatio ad collaboratio amogst LNHA are stregtheed as a way of fosterig collective ifluece; at the same time, the Humaitaria Respose Grat Facility (HRGF) set up by ELNHA provides the opportuity for idividual LNHA to demostrate their ability to desig ad implemet quality humaitaria projects, hece ehacig their idividual voices. ELNHA s ifluecig ad egagemet activities at global level aim at havig iteratioal doors ad INGOs adaptig their policies, strategies ad systems to give more space to LNHA. This has bee doe for istace through ivestig i relatioships ad collaboratig with various etworks, UN agecies, ad door govermets who also support this systemic chage, e.g. through beig a active member of iteratioal workgroups, collaboratig o a coordiated research ageda o local humaitaria leadership ad co-orgaizig cofereces. ELNHA also strives at actig as a role model, by actively supportig the participatio of LNHA represetatives to global debate spaces wheever a opportuity arises. The complete project theory of chage is show i Appedix to this ToR. 1
Direct beeficiaries of ELNHA are LNHA who get capacity ad support to play a leadig role i humaitaria resposes ow ad i the future. Idirect beeficiaries are the vulerable me, wome ad childre who beefit from more effective ad appropriate humaitaria resposes. The rage of direct beeficiaries i both coutry, at atioal ad sub-atioal levels, is fairly broad ad icludes govermet istitutios (at atioal ad decetralized level), local ad atioal NGOs (LNNGOs), etworks, private sector, media bodies cotributig to preparedess ad respose. Withi these sub-groups of LNHA, some variability i terms of philosophy ad approach are also observed; for istace, some LNNGOs act as civil society orgaizatios (icludig wome s orgaizatios) while others have a stroger busiess orietatio. The ELNHA project is implemeted by dedicated project teams i Bagladesh, Ugada ad at Global level, made of Oxfam staff. Supportig parters were selected amog LNHA i both coutries, to co-implemet the project; there are 6 supportig parters i Bagladesh ad 3 i Ugada. I additio, some local actors (called lead actors i Bagladesh) have stepped forward to take the lead o selected capacity developmet activities facilitated by ELNHA. 2. Ratioale ad purpose of the evaluatio The ELNHA project is edig o 31 December 2018. At the time of this fial evaluatio, the two ELNHA coutries will be wrappig up the implemetatio of activities for the third year. The mai aim of the evaluatio is to systematically aalyze the actual outcomes of the project ad its uderlyig workig mechaisms agaist the Theory of Chage. I view of the duratio of the project (3 years), its focus o capacity developmet ad sector chage, the impact of ELNHA o the quality of humaitaria assistace received by crisis-affected people i Bagladesh ad Ugada is expected to be still modest. The mai focus of this fial evaluatio shall hece be o the outcomes ad processes rather tha the impact level. Where available, impact level data from the project MEAL system (icludig Real Time Review reports, feedback from beeficiaries of HRGF-fuded resposes) should iform the evaluatio, but it is ot expected that additioal data will be collected at this level. The purpose of this fial evaluatio is threefold: Buildig istitutioal kowledge: The fial evaluatio will idetify lessos leared ad geerate kowledge that shall iform the developmet of curret ad future projects supportig local leadership i the humaitaria sector, both i terms of activities ad i terms of approach. Ehacig sustaiability: Based o the gathered iformatio ad kowledge, the fial evaluatio will recommed actios by cocered humaitaria actors so that the achieved chages (i capacity, relatioships, policy chages, etc.) ca be sustaied, as part of ELNHA exit strategy. Accoutability: The fial evaluatio with allow the ELNHA project to provide accoutability to its various stakeholders, i particular to the project parters, other LNHA i Bagladesh ad Ugada (icludig local ad atioal govermets), INGOs ad doors i coutries ad at global level, ad ELNHA s door, the Ikea Foudatio. Primary users of the evaluatio results are the followig: Oxfam ELNHA staff (global + i-coutry) ad parters implemetig the ELNHA project Other Oxfam staff (global + i-coutry) who are supportig ELNHA The Ikea Foudatio Secodary users of the evaluatio results will be the followig: Other agecies / iitiatives that are already supportig or iterested i supportig local humaitaria leadership LNHA i Bagladesh ad Ugada which are ivolved i the ELNHA project 3. Specific object ad objectives of the evaluatio The object of the evaluatio is the ELNHA project, as described i the approved ELNHA proposal ad with the chages brought to the approach as described i the aual reports to the door. 2
The specific objectives of the evaluatio are: To assess the extet to which the ELNHA project has cotributed to local humaitaria capacity ad leadership, lookig at its relevace, effectiveess, efficiecy, sustaiability ad impact. The evaluatio shall i particular focus o the approach (system approach, process-orieted, cosultative, stimulatig parterships buildig, cotext specific...), the structure ad set-up of the project (from district to global) ad its results uder outcome areas. To stimulate reflectios ad learig amog ELNHA teams, supportig parters, Oxfam coutry offices ad LNHA, icludig learig from failures ad challeges. To idetify, formulate ad share good practices, lessos ad strategic, actioable recommedatios o both programmatic ad project maagemet aspects, which ca iform the developmet of curret ad future projects supportig local leadership i the humaitaria sector. Suggestios o what ELNHA could have doe differetly shall also be provided. 4. Key questios of the evaluatio The mai questios to be aswered by the evaluatio are the followig: Relevace ad appropriateess of the project activities ad approach to the local eeds ad cotext. Evaluatio questios could iclude (lookig at ELNHA s approach, structure / set-up, activities ad results): - What was the relevace of the ELNHA s approach ad activities (i coutries ad at global level) i view of the evisioed systemic chage? - Were the capacity ivestmets of ELNHA appropriate? What made the capacity ivestmets appropriate or ot appropriate? - Did the ELNHA approach ad activities i Bagladesh ad Ugada suit the priorities ad eeds of the diverse groups of LNHA? Did the project build o the eablers of capacities ad empowermet of LNHA i these coutries? Did ELNHA address some of the blockers of capacities ad empowermet of LNHA? What were the reasos for some LNHA to ot egage i the ELNHA process? - How did LNHA perceive ad uderstad the project ad what was their level of owership to promote its objectives? What has bee the level of stakeholders participatio through the differet phases of the project, icludig feedback mechaisms ad icorporatio of LNHA observatios? What have bee the roles of atioal ad local govermets i the ELNHA process? - Was the project setup / structure (i particular the roles ad resposibilities of the ELNHA team, supportig parters, lead actors, atioal ad local govermet, ad other LNHA) appropriate? Did the project structure ad set-up promote LNHA owership ad leadership i each step? What worked well ad what could have bee improved i the project set-up? - Did ELNHA build o factors eablig global humaitaria doors ad INGOs to adapt their policies ad strategies i support of more local leadership? Did the project address some of the factors blockig global humaitaria doors ad INGOs from adaptig their policies ad strategies i support of more local leadership? Effectiveess assessig the extet to which project activities achieved their purpose (i.e. sustaiable capacity ad leadership of LNHA). This shall also ivolve a examiatio of the mai reasos why the itervetio achieved or did ot achieve particular objectives. Evaluatio questios could iclude (lookig at ELNHA s approach, structure / set-up, activities ad results): - What have bee the mai achievemets of the ELNHA project, i relatio to the project Theory of Chage? To which extet have the roles ad positio of LNHA egaged i the ELNHA process chaged ad how? - What had bee the effectiveess of project activities i achievig the plaed chages? Were the approach ad process through which the chages were brought about effective? - To which extet has the ivolvemet of atioal ad local govermets i the ELNHA process cotribute to its effectiveess? To which extet did the project approach ad activities brig ay 3
qualitative chage i parterships? Did ELNHA cotribute to buildig equitable partership with LNHA? - Has the project uiteded cosequeces, ad if yes which oes ad why? - To which extet did the ELNHA project lear from other orgaizatios ad iitiatives that are also promotig local humaitaria leadership, ad how? To which extet were lessos leart ad recommedatios gathered alog project implemetatio effectively fed ito desig ad implemetatio (iterative learig) ad/or iform other orgaizatios ad iitiatives that are also promotig local humaitaria leadership? Efficiecy measurig the outputs (qualitative ad quatitative) i relatio to the iputs, icludig a fiacial aalysis of relevat expeditures. Evaluatio questios could iclude: - Were the capacities ad resources required for achievig the iteded project objectives i place (both i coutries ad at global level, amog ELNHA team, supportig parters ad lead actors)? - Was the project structure / set-up efficiet? - To which extet were the various project activities (i capacity developmet, promotio of a collaborative approach betwee LNHA, ifluecig, CTP ) efficiet? What could / should have bee doe to ehace efficiecy of these activities? - Were ELNHA s activities cost-effective ad if ot, what could have bee doe to ehace costeffectiveess? Sustaiability assessig whether the chages achieved durig the ELNHA project are likely to be sustaied after the ed of the project. Evaluatio questios could iclude: - Did the capacity developmet activities result i sustaiable capacity withi LNHA? To which extet are the chages brought by the project likely to be sustaied beyod 2018? - To which extet has LNHA capacity ad voice bee supported ad developed towards more autoomous humaitaria leadership? - Which parterships have bee created (both at atioal ad decetralized levels) ad how are the ewly created relatioships betwee the various humaitaria actors ad their respective roles likely to be sustaied beyod the project? - Which ELNHA activities could be take over by other humaitaria actors ad how? Impact: The expected impact of ELNHA is that vulerable wome, me ad childre i Bagladesh ad Ugada shall beefit from quality humaitaria respose ad preparedess. I view of the duratio ad scope of the project, evaluatio questios could iclude: - What is the quality of humaitaria resposes fuded through the HRGF? - To what exted are LNHA better prepared to set humaitaria actio i motio? - To which extet are LNHA better set up to play a leadig role i humaitaria work i Bagladesh ad Ugada? - How are approaches tested by ELNHA beig take up or recommeded i other spaces? The evaluators shall pay a special attetio to the differeces ad cotext specificities ad comparability (geographical, cultural, social ad political cotext) betwee Bagladesh ad Ugada. The evaluatio shall also be sesitive to the differeces betwee the various types of LNHA (govermet, LNNGOs from CSOs to more commercial NGOs, etworks, private sector, media ). Note that evaluatio questios will be further fie-tued throughout the process to esure they respod to the specific iformatio eeds of the ELNHA team ad other key stakeholders. The ELNHA learig strategy (icluded i the ELNHA Moitorig Evaluatio Accoutability ad Learig Framework) cotais project learig questios from which the evaluators may select some additioal evaluatio questios. 4
5. Scope of the evaluatio ad proposed approach ad methods Proposed approach for the evaluatio The evaluatio shall cosist of a desk review of available project documets (listed below) followed by iterviews with the project teams ad supportig parters; lead actors; selected LNHA (icludig atioal ad local govermets, LNHA who were ot part of the project ); selected INGOs, UN agecies ad doors, Oxfam coutry office staff, etc. Iterviews with stakeholders from Bagladesh ad Ugada shall be coducted icoutry, while iterviews with the global ELNHA team ad relevat iteratioal NGOs (icludig other Oxfam affiliates / coutry offices who adopted some elemets of ELNHA), doors ad etworks at iteratioal level shall be coducted remotely (for example via Skype) uless opportuities arise for some face-to-face iterviews. A umber of exteral reviews ad evaluatios have already take place durig the course of the project, ad a body of moitorig data has bee collected; the evaluators shall hece aalyze the available data ad reports, while iterviews ad i-coutry visits shall help to collect iformatio o evaluatio areas / questios which are ot yet (fully) covered by the available materials. Evaluators shall use as much as possible participatory methods for data collectio. The list of orgaizatios / agecies ad persos to be met / iterviewed will be fialized with the evaluators after submissio of the detailed methodology. The followig priciples are expected to guide the further developmet of the methodology: Participatio: Allow for the meaigful participatio of ELNHA / Oxfam staff, supportig parters, lead actors ad other LNHA i the evaluatio process. I this regard, ELNHA direct beeficiaries shall be ivolved i the refiig of the focus of the evaluatio ad key evaluatio questios. Coflict sesitivity: The evaluatio should be coducted i adherece to coflict-sesitivity priciples, while also ot raisig expectatios from direct / idirect beeficiaries. Geder equality: The proposed approach should as far as possible collect views from both male ad female staff of sector stakeholders who have bee ivolved i ELNHA. Data triagulatio: The evaluators will try as far as possible to gather iformatio through differet complemetary sources, icludig actors who are ot bee egaged i the ELNHA process. At the ed of each i-coutry visit, the evaluators will preset the prelimiary fidigs from the documet review ad iterviews to the ELNHA team, supportig parters, selected LNHA ad Oxfam coutry office staff. Scope of the evaluatio The evaluatio will ecompass the ELNHA project from 1 st of Jauary 2016 util the momet of the coutry visits. Documet Review The key documets for this evaluatio process iclude: The approved ELNHA proposal The updated ELNHA Theory of Chage ELNHA iteral documet outliig roles ad resposibilities of ELNHA team ad supportig parters ELNHA Moitorig, Evaluatio, Accoutability ad Learig (MEAL) framework ELNHA Humaitaria Capacity Developmet Strategy Oxfam s global Local Humaitaria Leadership Campaig Strategy ad coutries ELNHA Ifluecig Strategies Stakeholders mappig ad aalysis Humaitaria Coutry Capacity Aalysis (HUCOCA) reports 2016 ad 2018, icludig recommedatios ad idicative capacity developmet pla for the sector 2017 ad 2018 District Joit Actio Plas (JAPs) 5
Moitorig data at outcome level (data o key performace idicators, outcome harvestig statemets) ad output level (capacity developmet activities database) Miutes of ELNHA mothly learig ad sharig sessios HRGF guidelies ad HRGF packs Proposals from LNHA accepted for HRGF fudig ad reports by gratees Reports of learig review with HRGF gratees at the ed of each humaitaria respose roud Reports from the Real Time Review of HRGF-fuded resposes Reports o perceptios of beeficiaries of HRGF-fuded resposes Report o the exteral review of the HRGF mechaism HCDF guidelies ad HCDF packs Proposals submitted to the HCDF Report o the exteral HCDF learig review Various studies udertake by ELNHA i both coutries: Situatioal aalysis o Cash Trasfer Programmig, Ifluecig situatioal aalysis, Coutry cotext aalysis, Coutry coflict sesitivity reports, Emergecy market assessmet reports, Studies o fiacial flows to LNHA, etc. Project iteral quarterly reports (iteral ELNHA reportig, reportig from project supportig parters), icludig relevat aexes Aual reports Year 1 ad Year 2, icludig relevat aexes ELNHA Mid Term Evaluatio Summary discussios ad agreemets of ELNHA Mid Term Review Audit reports Year 1 ad Year 2 Project workplas Relevat miutes / reports of meetigs, cofereces ad evets Relevat commuicatio materials, videos, etc. 6. Evaluatio cosultat(s) We are lookig for a team of experieced evaluators, with preferably a pricipal cosultat, who shall take the overall lead ad resposibility, ad a local cosultat for each coutry. The pricipal cosultat shall lead o the preparatio of the methodology, udertake iterviews at global level, take part i data collectio i both coutries ad lead the writig of the overall evaluatio report. I case applicats wat to propose a alterative team compositio, they should justify the added-value of this team compositio, ad demostrate that cosultats i charge of data collectio at coutry level have sufficiet uderstadig of the coutry s cotext ad humaitaria architecture. The team should as far as possible be geder-balaced, ad it should possess the followig qualificatios: Demostrated experiece with evaluatig processes, i particular of iitiatives aimig at systemic chage Demostrated experiece i coductig multi-coutry evaluatios Experiece with humaitaria programmes / projects, humaitaria cycle maagemet ad humaitaria architecture (the humaitaria system ) Demostrated uderstadig of (humaitaria) capacity developmet, sector collaboratio stregtheig ad ifluecig processes, icludig local humaitaria leadership ad ability to apply this uderstadig to the evaluatio approach ad implemetatio Excellet commuicatio ad facilitatio skills Excellet writig ad presetatio skills i Eglish Kowledge of the local cotext; fluecy i Bagala for the local cosultat ivolved i data collectio i Bagladesh Kowledge of the work of Oxfam or other iteratioal NGOs (Desirable) Havig atteded security traiig (Desirable) 6
Sectio 10 i this ToR provides guidelies o the cotet of the proposal. 7. Schedule, logistics ad deliverables. Proposed timig The geeral timelie below is tetative ad shall be cofirmed with the selected evaluators: Publicatio of ToR for the Evaluatio Submissio of proposals Evaluatio of proposals Approval of selected evaluators Sigig of cotract Start off meetig evaluatio team ELNHA team Literature review ad preparatio of iceptio report (icludig methodology) Submissio draft iceptio report Telecoferece with ELNHA team presetig ad discussig proposed methodology ad focus of i-coutry data collectio Roud of writte commets o iceptio report (icludig from supportig parters ad other LNHA i both coutries) Fial iceptio report Data collectio global level Data collectio ad presetatio of fidigs i Bagladesh Data collectio ad presetatio of fidigs i Ugada Submissio of draft evaluatio reports: oe overall evaluatio report, ad a shorter coutry-specific report for each coutry Roud of writte commets o draft evaluatio reports Submissio of fial evaluatio reports By 06 July 2018 By 01 August 2018 By 07 August 2018 By 16 August 2018 By 23 August 2018 By 24 September 2018 26 September 07 October 2018 11 October 2018 15 October 2018 18 October 2018 22 October 2018 22 25 October 2018 28 October 08 November 2018 12 23 November 2018 By 10 December 2018 By 17 December 2018 By 10 Jauary 2019 It is proposed to structure the i-coutry visits roughly as follows: Day 1-3: Meetigs with project team ad atioal level stakeholders Day 4: Travel to first district Day 5-6: Data collectio i first district Day 7: Travel to secod district Day 8-9: Data collectio i secod district Day 10: Travel back to capital city Day 11-12: Preparatios ad facilitatio of lessos leart workshop with coutry ELNHA team, supportig parters ad other relevat stakeholders Evaluators shall iclude i their proposals the umber of days they ited to sped o each of the above activities. 7
Logistics ELNHA teams i coutries, with support of relevat coutry office staffs, will be resposible for arragig accommodatio ad trasport, ad will assist the evaluators with the practical orgaizatio of workshops, schedulig of iterviews, etc. Deliverables Deliverable Deadlie Paymet A clear ad cocise draft iceptio report providig, based o the literature review, the proposed methodology ad detailed work pla Fial iceptio report icludig feedback ad agreemets from the telecoferece with the ELNHA team ad writte cosolidated feedback o the submitted draft iceptio report 11/10/2018 N/A 22/10/2018 N/A Presetatio of i-coutry fidigs ad recommedatios At the ed of each coutry visit N/A A clear ad cocise draft overall evaluatio report, followig the outlie agreed upo durig the iceptio phase 10/12/2018 40% Shorter coutry-specific evaluatio reports Fial overall ad coutry-specific evaluatio reports (icludig a Executive Summary writte for a wider audiece, which ca be used as a stad-aloe documet ad captures the essece of the project as well as the mai fidigs ad recommedatios relevat for similar projects 10/01/2019 60% 8. Evaluatio resposibilities ad maagemet arragemets The Global MEAL Officer will be the Evaluatio Maager ad first poit of cotact for the evaluators, ad will esure access to documets, people ad other iformatio eeded to aswer the evaluatio questios. Together with the ELNHA Project Maagers (Global, Bagladesh ad Ugada) the Evaluatio Maager will esure the quality of the evaluatio ad adherece to Oxfam s ad back door s procedures ad requiremets. The Evaluatio Maager ad ELNHA Project Maagers (Global, Bagladesh ad Ugada) will select the team of evaluators, cosolidate iput to the methodology from the project teams, supportig parters ad other LNHA ad share these with the evaluators (durig the telecoferece o the iceptio phase ad through writte feedback o the iceptio report), ad approve later chages to evaluatio work pla ad budget. They will also give cosolidate iput ad commets from the project teams, supportig parters ad other LNHA o draft evaluatio reports ad approve the fial evaluatio reports ad its correspodig maagemet respose. Besides gatherig ad providig feedback to the evaluators at relevat stages, the ELNHA teams i coutries, with support of relevat coutry office staffs, will provide support durig coutry visits, icludig for logistical aspects. They will itroduce the evaluators to supportig parters, LNHA ad iteratioal NGOs ad doors i coutry. The ELNHA Global Ifluecig Officer will support the evaluators i gettig i cotact with relevat INGOs, doors ad etworks from global level. 9. Dissemiatio pla ad resposibilities for sharig ad usig the fidigs. Before the ed of the coutry visits, the evaluators will share ad discuss the prelimiary evaluatio results ad iitial recommedatios with ELNHA staff, supportig parters, selected LNHA ad relevat Oxfam coutry office staff. 8
The fial evaluatio reports will be i Eglish accordig to a mutually agreed outlie (see stadard example i Appedix). I lie with Oxfam s commitmet to trasparecy ad accoutability, a copy of the fial report will be published o Oxfam s Atlas website ad will be made available to project stakeholders, icludig, but ot limited to the Ikea Foudatio. I geeral, the ELNHA team will be resposible for developig a specific actio pla to esure the dissemiatio of the relevat evaluatio fidigs ad recommedatios to other stakeholders (for example atioal ad local govermets, INGOs ad doors supportig local humaitaria leadership ). Noetheless, the evaluators shall share with the ELNHA team ay recommedatios i terms of the dissemiatio of fidigs that would emerge from the evaluatio. 10. Process of the selectio of the evaluators ad expectatios for evaluatio proposal The proposal submitted by the evaluators will set out ad describe how the evaluators will operatioalize ad carry out the evaluatio, brigig refiemets, specificity ad elaboratio to the ToR. The evaluatio of the cosultats offers will focus o the value for moey criterio, with particular attetio for the techical quality of the proposal ad the experiece of the proposed team (CV s). The selectio of the evaluators will follow Oxfam policy ad procedures. Oxfam withholds the right to coduct iterviews with oe or more potetial suppliers to seek further clarificatio o the submitted quotatios, proposal ad previous experieces of the potetial evaluators. The techical part of the proposal should miimally cotai the followig: The evaluators uderstadig ad iterpretatio of the ToR, icludig evaluatio questios Detailed descriptio of approach, methodology, tools ad aalysis, with a clear explaatio of strategies to esure the participatio of ELNHA staff, ELNHA supportig parters, lead actors, LNHA, INGOs ad doors, other Oxfam staff, etc. Overview of perceived risks ad mitigatio strategies Work pla detailig the timig of the assigmet, icludig the proposed divisio of tasks betwee evaluators ad their respective availabilities Proposed reportig format ad outlie I additio, the followig iformatio should be provided: Total budget with a cost breakdow i days or hours spet ad the related fees for the tasks (makig the distictio for each evaluator). Costs for accommodatio ad meals, flights ad other forms of trasport, which are icluded i this budget shall be estimate. Actual costs shall be reimbursed i accordace with Oxfam Novib s expese policy for cosultats. CVs of the proposed evaluators, icludig previous experiece with similar assigmets. The selected evaluators are expected to be available to start as per the timelie described uder Sectio 7. NB: Oce the selectio process is fialized, ad before proceedig to sig the cotract with the evaluatio team, the submitted proposal will be updated to iclude ay additioal adjustmets / agreemets that will have bee made betwee the selected evaluators ad ELNHA team. Quotatios should be submitted by e-mail to Valérie Bey, Global MEAL Officer, valerie.bey@oxfamovib.l The deadlie for submissio is Wedesday the 1 st of August 2018 at midight Netherlads time (UTC/GMT +2). Ay questios, remarks or requests for clarificatio ca be sed to valerie.bey@oxfamovib.l before Friday the 20 th of July 2018 (UTC/GMT +2). The questios will be aswered o later tha Tuesday the 24 th of July 2018. 9
Appedix 1: Recommeded outlie of a evaluatio report 1. cover page clearly idetifyig the report as a evaluatio ad statig: evaluatio title Program/project title /affiliate idetificatio code Geographical coverage: global;regio; coutry(ies date that the evaluatio report was fialised evaluators ame(s) ad logo (if available) Oxfam logo (uless ot appropriate) appropriate recogitio of istitutioal door support. Clear statemet i case this report ca NOT be used exterally 2. Table of cotets 3. Glossary 4. List of abbreviatios. 5. Executive summary that ca be used as a stad-aloe documet 6. Itroductio, statig objectives of the evaluatio ad evaluatio questios 7. The itervetio ad cotext 8. Explaatio ad justificatio of used methodologies, icludig the perceived limitatios 9. Presetatio of the fidigs ad their aalysis, icludig quotes (without idetificatio of specific idividuals) 10. Coclusios 11. Learig ad Recommedatios 12. Appedices: Terms of referece Iceptio report with fial work pla List of participats, iterviewees (ame, fuctio ad workig eviromet) ad places visited. List of documets ad bibliography used. Lik to Methodological appedices: The evaluatio proposal Evaluatio istrumets such as questioaires ad iterview guides o Iterview otes ad quotes 10
EARLY OUTCOME INTERMEDIATE Appedix 2: ELNHA Theory of Chage IMPACT: Vulerable wome, me ad childre i Bagladesh ad Ugada beefit from effective ad appropriate humaitaria respose ad preparedess. A1 ULTIMATE OUTCOME: Capable Local ad Natioal Humaitaria Actors (LNHA) i Bagladesh ad Ugada play a leadig role i humaitaria work, puttig the iterest of wome, me ad childre affected by disaster at the ceter. A2 A2 A2 IO1. STRENGTH: LNHA have capacity to desig, deliver ad lead i humaitaria preparedess ad respose i Bagladesh ad Ugada. IO2. VOICE: LNHA i Bagladesh ad Ugada have the voice ad power to ifluece the humaitaria ageda i their coutry. IO3. SPACE: Iteratioal humaitaria doors, atioal govermets ad INGOs tailor their policies, strategies, systems ad practices to eable other LNHA to lead i humaitaria preparedess ad respose. A5 A4 A3 EO1: LNHA have defied missio, strategies ad systems ad are able to mobilize, attract, obtai ad maage resources for humaitaria preparedess ad respose accordig to the Core Humaitaria Stadards ad other iteratioal humaitaria priciples ad stadards. EO2: LNHA collect, aalyze, share ad use relevat iformatio i a coordiated ad iclusive way for humaitaria preparedess ad respose accordig to the Core Humaitaria Stadards ad other iteratioal humaitaria priciples ad stadards. EO4: Participatig LNHA coordiate, collaborate ad ifluece others aroud a shared humaitaria ifluecig strategy. EO 5: LNHA demostrate their ability to use humaitaria emergecy fuds (created by this program or other fudig opportuities) to desig ad implemet programs accordig to the Core Humaitaria Stadards ad other iteratioal humaitaria priciples ad stadards. EO 6: Iteratioal humaitaria doors, atioal govermets ad INGOs demostrate accoutable partership with other LNHA for developig a stroger humaitaria programmig. EO 7: Iteratioal humaitaria doors, atioal govermets ad INGOs make a substative amout of humaitaria fudig directly available to other LNHA. EO 8: Iteratioal NGOs use their ifluece i support of stregtheig the role ad leadership of LNHA. 11