PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

Similar documents
PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

Network Manager Adding value to the Network 29 September 2011

Hosted by General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA)

Performance fabec air navigation service providers

EUROCONTROL. Visit of the Transport Attachés. 10 April Frank Brenner. Director General EUROCONTROL

Network Operations Performance

InterFAB Ops meeting Traffic volatility in Brussels hotspot sectors

Traffic, delays and forecasts European summer traffic falls outlook for modest long-term growth

ATM in Europe It s all about Performance

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - June 2012

Case study London Heathrow & London Heathrow-Amsterdam

Network Management, building on our experience of flow management and network planning.

Performance Planning Environment. Bernhard Mayr, CM Financial and Performance Committee, 23 May 2014

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - August 2012

Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis November 2018

Monthly Network Operations Report

FABEC Operations. From a project-driven approach to continuous operational improvements

Analysis of most constraining en route ATFM regulations, attributed to ATC capacity, during 2017

European Performance Scheme

Monthly Network Operations Report

EUROCONTROL General Presentation

Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis December 2018

Monthly Network Operations Report

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - March 2012

Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis February 2019

Performance Planning Operations: Environment. Bernhard Mayr, CM TF Performance, MoT Germany 20 May 2011

Follow up to the implementation of safety and air navigation regional priorities XMAN: A CONCEPT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ATFCM CROSS-BORDER EXCHANGES

ANNUAL NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT Main Report

NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT September 2011

NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT OCTOBER 2011

Monthly Network Operations Report

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - May 2012

InterFAB Cooperation: XMAN Implementing Extended Cross-Border Arrival Management. World ATM Congress Madrid, 8 March 2016

Monthly Network Operations Report

ATFM delay report August Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

Customer Relations Programme

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - July 2012

Luxembourg TMA Contingency measures. Clear the sky procedure & Agreement on service continuity

EUROCONTROL. Eric MIART Manager - Airport Operations Programme (APR)

Monthly Network Operations Report

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis February 2013

SIMULATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AIRSPACE

The Network Manager User Forum 2017

ATFM delay report October Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report December Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

AMAN RESEARCH IN SESAR

ATFM delay report November Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report July Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis November 2012

ATFM delay report November Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report February Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report January Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)

Free Route Airspace Maastricht (FRAM)

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - April 2012

Monthly Network Operations Report

Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)

Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis January 2019

ANNEX ANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU).../...

EUROCONTROL. An introduction to the EUROCONTROL Network Manager Operations Centre

Strategic airspace capacity planning in a network under demand uncertainty (COCTA project results)

Monthly Network Operations Report

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT INDIA S PERSPECTIVE. Vineet Gulati GM(ATM-IPG), AAI

SES Performance Scheme

Monthly Network Operations Report

CANSO Workshop on Operational Performance. LATCAR, 2016 John Gulding Manager, ATO Performance Analysis Federal Aviation Administration

Forty years of vision. The EUROCONTROL Maastricht UAC story. years of vision EUROCONTROL MAASTRICHT UAC EUROCONTROL

ATFM delay report February Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

Demand capacity balancing in a dynamic fashion. Sonke Mahlich, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre

ATFM delay report April 2018

SESAR ANNUAL DEMO WORKSHOP. Toulouse, October 2014 TOPLINK 1 & 2 Daniel MULLER, TOPLINK PM

Different views on Performance

ANNUAL NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT Main Report Final Edition

Using PBN for Terminal and Extended Terminal Operations

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION EUROCONTROL. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No /.. DD/MM/YYYY

FACTS & FIGURES 2016

OAG FACTS January 2013

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Weather Management in Aviation

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

Main Air Traffic Management Center

International Civil Aviation Organization WORLDWIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE (ATCONF) SIXTH MEETING. Montréal, 18 to 22 March 2013

Single European Sky Benefits for the airline industry. Warsaw, 28 November 2011

Monthly Network Operations Report

Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)

2017 Overview and 2018 Outlook

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

Monthly Network Operations Report

Public Hearing on Single European Sky II: «Make or Break Time» Views of the European Commission

Network Manager nominated by the European Commission EUROCONTROL. Network Operations Report 2013

The flow centric approach :

EU Report. Europe AUGUST 2017

Agenda. Institutional Arrangements Structures Procedures Example of TSA200 FUA at Regional Level

ECOsystem: MET-ATM integration to improve Aviation efficiency

Towards a Global ATFM Manual. Brian Flynn Head Network Operations

Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis December 2015

Transcription:

PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015-2019 CAPACITY December 2018

Contents Description & Analysis 3 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (en-route) 4 FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (arrival) 5 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) 6 KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) 7 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) 8 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) 9 KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ACC) 10 KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) 11 KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) 12 Glossary 13 Page: 2

Description & Analysis Europe Traffic in December 2018 increased by 5.2% compared to December 2017 and was in line with the baseline forecast. Eleven states added more than 50 flights daily to the network with Germany, Spain and Italy as the top contributors. Germany was the main contributor, adding 470 flights per day. Additional traffic is generated by its internal flow (+128 flights/day) as some airlines have now filled the gaps left following airberlin s failure at the end of October 2017. Germany also gained flights on its flows to and from Spain (+51 flights/day), Italy (+41 flights/day) and Austria (+28 flights/day). Spain and Italy were the next two contributors adding respectively 257 and 208 flights per day to the network. Both States recorded additional traffic on their flows from and to Germany (above mentioned) but also thanks to increase on their internal flow (+51 flights/day for Spain and +56 flights per day for Italy). Additional traffic between the two States was recorded too (24 flights/day). On the other end of the list, a few States have been recording a decline in local traffic, amongst which Turkey (-32 flights/day) affected by a general reduction of domestic traffic. The low-cost segment recorded the fastest growth with an 8.7% increase. Traditional scheduled and non-scheduled (charter) segments grew by 5% (each). On the other hand, the all-cargo and business aviation segments declined by 9.3% and 3.1% respectively. The airlines which added the most flights to the European network on a daily basis compared with December 2017 were, Easyjet UK (+193 flights), Ryanair (+130 flights), Lufthansa (+99 flights), Eurowings (+71 flights) and LOT (+49 flights). The average en-route ATFM delay per flight in the NM area in December was 0.71 min/flt, which is above the corresponding monthly guideline value of 0.30 min/flt. The average YTD en-route ATFM delay per flight in 2018 in the NM area is 1.73 min/flt, which is more than three times the corresponding guideline value of 0.50 min/flt. (Source: NM). FABEC In the FABEC area, traffic increased by 7.2% in December 2018 compared to the same month in 2017. This traffic growth is significantly above the STATFOR baseline scenario published in March 2015. All FABEC ANSPs recorded a traffic increase above 5% in December, the highest increase for DFS with 8.6%. The landings in the FABEC area (only the airports included in the performance plan) recorded an increase by 7.0%. The 2018 YTD arrival traffic evolution is now 2.2% higher than in 2017. DFS continued to record an exceptional increase of landings (+12.1% this month, partly recovering from AirBerlin end of activity last year). All the other FABEC members recorded an increase of landings as well but to a lesser extent: LVNL (+4.4%), DSNA (+4.0%), skyguide (+3.2%), skeyes (+2.6%). The units with the highest ATFM en-route delay in December 2018 are Karlsruhe (156 698 min.), Marseille (47 348 min.) and Maastricht (36 349 min.). In Karlsruhe, delays were due to 'ATC-Capacity' (65%), 'Staffing' (31%), 'Airspace Management' (2%), 'Other' (1%) and 'Weather' (1%); in Marseille, 'Staffing' (55%), 'Industrial Action' (35%, 14 Dec.), 'ATC-Capacity' (8%) and 'Technical' (1%). in Maastricht, 'Staffing' (39%), 'Special Event' (22%, Free Route implementation Phase 2), 'Other' (16%, SAIP - AD4 Swanwick Airspace Improvement Programme), 'ATC-Capacity' (13%), 'Weather' (10%) and 'Airspace Management' (1%). Brest, Reims, Zurich and Bordeaux also induced delays in December 2018, but to a lower extent; Brest (25 640 min.; 57% due to 'Industrial Action', 36% 'Staffing'), Reims (52% due to 'Staffing', 31% 'ATC-Capacity' and 11% 'Weather'); Zurich (22 711 min.; 90% due to 'Staffing', 10% 'ATC-Capacity'); Bordeaux (20 374 min.; 69% due to 'Staffing', 30% 'Industrial Action'). The en-route ATFM delay per flight all causes reached 0.87 min/flt in December 2018 compared to 0.29 min/flt in 2017. The YTD en-route ATFM delay per flight shows a deterioration compared to last year (2.12 min/flt vs. 1.15 min/flt in 2017). This result is far above the 2018 capacity target (0.42 min/flt). The YTD en-route ATFM delay CRSTMP causes reaches 1.40 min/flt. This corresponds to a performance drop compared to last year (0.76 min/flt); this value is, as well, far above the 2018 CRSTMP target (0.33 min/flt). The Arrival ATFM delay per arrival movement all causes decreased in December from 1.25 min/flt in 2017 to 0.82 min/flt in 2018 (a performance improvement by 34%). The arrival ATFM delay per arrival flight CRSTMP causes increased from 0.07 min/flt in December 2017 to 0.09 min/flt in 2018. The airports with the highest ATFM delay in December 2018 more than 10% of the total FABEC arrival delay were Amsterdam/EHAM (76 082 min.) and Paris-Orly/LFPO (17 128 min.). In Amsterdam, delays were due to 'Weather'(85%) and Aerodrome capacity' (14%); in Paris-Orly, 'Aerodrome capacity' (48%), 'Weather' (31%), 'Industrial Action' (18%) and 'ATC- Capacity' (3%). Before applying the post-ops adjustment process, LVNL is the only ANSP to reach its CRSTMP en-route target in 2018; no other FABEC members achieved their respective CRSTMP en-route ATFM delay target in 2018. For skyguide, the expected application of the post-adjustment process should lead to just achieve the target. On the other hand, all FABEC members achieved their respective CRSTMP Arrival ATFM delay per arrival flight target in 2018. P.S.: In the context of the post-ops performance adjustment process, delays figures for all ANSPs are not consolidated yet. Page: 3

IFR Flights FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (en-route) FABEC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 YTD 2017 Monthly 408 380 390 913 456 579 493 697 549 331 561 854 598 206 580 758 566 817 539 790 428 731 414 723 5 989 779 2018 Monthly 419 452 399 761 467 833 505 789 554 363 575 947 612 280 597 957 583 092 564 856 453 639 444 489 6 179 458 Growth (%) 2.7 % 2.3 % 2.5 % 2.4 % 0.9 % 2.5 % 2.4 % 3.0 % 2.9 % 4.6 % 5.8 % 7.2 % 3.2 % FPP RP2 2018 399 183 380 820 441 248 458 778 506 547 515 400 541 767 524 918 518 262 500 254 419 096 401 552 5 607 826 2018 / RP2 (%) - Monthly 5.1 % 5.0 % 6.0 % 10.2 % 9.4 % 11.7 % 13.0 % 13.9 % 12.5 % 12.9 % 8.2 % 10.7 % 2018 / RP2 (%) - Cumulated 5.1 % 5.0 % 5.4 % 6.7 % 7.3 % 8.2 % 9.0 % 9.7 % 10.0 % 10.3 % 10.2 % 10.2 % 2017 Monthly and 2018 Monthly values represent actual movements (source: PRU). RP2 2017 represents the traffic forecast (STATFOR low- growth 02/2015) underpinning the FABEC Performance Plan, split into monthly values on the basis of a FABEC consolidated methodology. 650 000 600 000 550 000 500 000 450 000 400 000 350 000 419 452 399 761 467 833 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly FPP RP2 2018 505 789 554 363 575 947 612 280 597 957 583 092 564 856 YTD skeyes 2017 Monthly 43 381 40 904 49 093 51 528 57 327 58 122 60 679 58 562 58 651 57 821 47 761 44 876 628 705 2018 Monthly 44 799 42 925 50 291 53 789 58 645 60 296 63 039 61 022 60 111 58 879 48 221 47 119 649 136 Growth (%) 3.3 % 4.9 % 2.4 % 4.4 % 2.3 % 3.7 % 3.9 % 4.2 % 2.5 % 1.8 % 1.0 % 5.0 % 3.2 % 2017 Monthly 207 690 197 449 232 389 243 825 273 488 277 744 291 083 283 588 283 914 274 704 220 629 207 969 2 994 472 2018 Monthly 212 646 203 601 238 141 252 735 280 725 287 148 300 814 295 118 291 235 289 102 236 401 225 799 3 113 465 Growth (%) 2.4 % 3.1 % 2.5 % 3.7 % 2.6 % 3.4 % 3.3 % 4.1 % 2.6 % 5.2 % 7.1 % 8.6 % 4.0 % 2017 Monthly 206 853 198 320 230 645 264 980 293 336 305 789 332 010 319 032 305 158 284 474 216 125 216 341 3 173 063 2018 Monthly 213 336 202 724 240 485 267 839 293 860 311 779 337 069 325 019 314 605 296 295 226 565 228 286 3 257 862 Growth (%) 3.1 % 2.2 % 4.3 % 1.1 % 0.2 % 2.0 % 1.5 % 1.9 % 3.1 % 4.2 % 4.8 % 5.5 % 2.7 % 2017 Monthly 44 846 42 754 51 005 52 668 57 993 56 076 58 322 58 134 56 108 56 514 48 109 44 817 627 346 2018 Monthly 46 296 44 327 50 909 50 287 57 154 56 123 58 261 57 756 56 676 57 414 48 678 47 151 631 032 Growth (%) 3.2 % 3.7 % -0.2 % -4.5 % -1.4 % 0.1 % -0.1 % -0.7 % 1.0 % 1.6 % 1.2 % 5.2 % 0.6 % 2017 Monthly 133 477 125 041 145 379 152 421 168 532 168 567 176 304 172 076 169 510 166 100 137 467 133 707 1 848 581 2018 Monthly 135 713 126 950 147 139 154 376 168 707 168 910 176 472 173 216 168 749 168 395 142 381 141 678 1 872 686 Growth (%) 1.7 % 1.5 % 1.2 % 1.3 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.7 % -0.4 % 1.4 % 3.6 % 6.0 % 1.3 % 2017 Monthly 83 431 80 925 94 941 102 124 113 118 117 991 125 394 120 501 119 052 113 726 85 542 85 865 1 242 610 2018 Monthly 86 394 82 941 97 689 107 080 117 936 124 702 131 917 128 638 125 622 119 747 90 115 91 030 1 303 811 DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC skyguide 453 639 444 489 Growth (%) 3.6 % 2.5 % 2.9 % 4.9 % 4.3 % 5.7 % 5.2 % 6.8 % 5.5 % 5.3 % 5.3 % 6.0 % 4.9 % Source: EUROCONTROL - PRU / Performance Plan RP1 Page: 4

IFR ARR Flights FABEC TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT (arrival) FABEC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 YTD 2017 Monthly 186 527 179 218 208 258 215 117 236 161 235 319 244 758 235 151 237 682 231 904 194 055 185 340 2 589 490 2018 Monthly 189 660 180 419 209 287 217 664 233 911 237 622 248 909 240 578 242 314 241 201 205 323 198 327 2 645 215 Growth (%) 1.7 % 0.7 % 0.5 % 1.2 % -1.0 % 1.0 % 1.7 % 2.3 % 1.9 % 4.0 % 5.8 % 7.0 % 2.2 % 2017 Monthly and 2018 Monthly values represent actual arrivals (source: PRU). 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly 300 000 233 911 237 622 248 909 240 578 242 314 241 201 250 000 209 287 217 664 205 323 189 660 198 327 200 000 180 419 150 000 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) YTD ANA LUX 2 472 2 370 2 814 2 999 3 253 3 235 3 193 2 979 3 165 3 218 2 919 2 751 35 368 2 788 2 607 3 008 3 249 3 389 3 414 3 313 3 129 3 352 3 366 3 024 2 830 37 469 12.8 % 10.0 % 6.9 % 8.3 % 4.2 % 5.5 % 3.8 % 5.0 % 5.9 % 4.6 % 3.6 % 2.9 % 5.9 % 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) skeyes 9 664 9 257 10 879 10 825 12 073 11 919 12 327 11 932 11 997 11 704 10 442 9 580 132 599 9 676 9 263 10 646 11 094 11 701 11 711 12 477 12 046 11 860 11 367 10 594 9 826 132 261 0.1 % 0.1 % -2.1 % 2.5 % -3.1 % -1.7 % 1.2 % 1.0 % -1.1 % -2.9 % 1.5 % 2.6 % -0.3 % 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) DFS 73 702 71 414 82 929 83 838 93 496 92 780 95 300 93 225 95 491 94 191 78 002 71 138 1 025 506 73 971 72 422 83 650 86 752 94 000 94 769 98 092 97 183 98 506 100 871 86 195 79 756 1 066 167 0.4 % 1.4 % 0.9 % 3.5 % 0.5 % 2.1 % 2.9 % 4.2 % 3.2 % 7.1 % 10.5 % 12.1 % 4.0 % 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) DSNA 64 571 62 544 72 516 77 402 84 466 85 445 90 066 83 514 84 712 80 418 66 728 65 988 918 370 66 247 61 688 72 535 76 311 82 339 85 816 91 320 84 966 86 309 82 645 68 991 68 659 927 826 2.6 % -1.4 % 0.0 % -1.4 % -2.5 % 0.4 % 1.4 % 1.7 % 1.9 % 2.8 % 3.4 % 4.0 % 1.0 % 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) LVNL 18 164 17 140 20 193 21 439 23 272 22 573 23 770 23 847 22 658 22 915 19 494 18 675 254 140 18 970 17 932 20 586 21 404 22 907 22 339 23 347 23 315 22 640 23 022 19 660 19 505 255 627 4.4 % 4.6 % 1.9 % -0.2 % -1.6 % -1.0 % -1.8 % -2.2 % -0.1 % 0.5 % 0.9 % 4.4 % 0.6 % 2017 Monthly 2018 Monthly Growth (%) skyguide 17 954 16 493 18 927 18 614 19 601 19 367 20 102 19 654 19 659 19 458 16 470 17 208 223 507 18 008 16 507 18 862 18 854 19 575 19 573 20 360 19 939 19 647 19 930 16 859 17 751 225 865 0.3 % 0.1 % -0.3 % 1.3 % -0.1 % 1.1 % 1.3 % 1.5 % -0.1 % 2.4 % 2.4 % 3.2 % 1.1 % Page: 5

KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) YTD YTD YTD YTD 2018 2017 2018 2017 En-route Delay All causes 2.12 1.15 En-route Delay CRSTMP causes 1.40 0.76 FABEC Target (yearly value) 0.42 FABEC Target (yearly value) 0.33 Guideline 0.42 Guideline 0.33 Minute ('000) ALL causes 13 090 6 887 Minute ('000) CRSTMP causes 8 650 4 534 Diff. 2018-2017 + 90.1 % Diff. 2018-2017 + 91 % Traffic ('000) 6 179 5 990 Potential savings (*) due to underbid the delay Target Diff. 2018-2017 + 3.2 % (all Causes) in Mio EURO (YTD) * Cost of ATFM-delay per min = 87 3.00 2.50 1.50 0.50 2.60 2.40 2.20 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 0.80 0.60 0.40 Yearly Value (RP 1) All Delay Causes 1.07 1.07 1.15 1.15 0.56 0.56 0.70 0.70 0.48 0.49 0.42 0.42 0.43 2017 (All Causes) Guideline (All Causes) 2018 (All Causes) Target (All Causes) Cumulated (YTD) YTD FABEC yearly Target 2.12 2.12 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 1.50 0.50 1.60 1.40 1.20 0.80 0.60 0.40 0,42 0,33 Yearly Value (RP 1) CRSTMP Delay Causes 0.67 0.67 0.76 0.76 0.48 0.48 0.37 0.38 0.31 0.31 0.33 0.0 2017 (CRSTMP) Guideline (CRSTMP) 2018 (CRSTMP) Target (CRSTMP) Cumulated (YTD) YTD FABEC yearly Target 1.40 1.40 0.33 0.34 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2017 monthly ADM 2018 monthly ADM 2017 monthly CRSTMP 2018 monthly CRSTMP 5.00 4.00 3.00 Monthly 4.28 4.46 3.75 3.13 2.57 1.87 1.69 1.81 1.78 1.40 1.29 1.51 0.98 0.21 0.43 0.17 0.27 0.92 0.49 0.47 0.87 0.24 0.29 3.50 3.00 2.50 1.50 0.50 Monthly 2.49 3.22 2.11 1.60 1.66 1.20 1.25 1.41 1.45 0.690.85 0.80 0.72 0.48 0.58 0.18 0.42 0.17 0.34 0.45 0.27 0.15 0.26 The guideline for the en-route ATFM delay per movement is a basic cumulative extrapolation of the previous three years monthly allocation and is designed to give an impression, how the YTD figures should be, in order to reach the yearly 2018 published targets (0.42 min per flight for all delay causes and 0.33 min per flight for the delay causes CRSTMP). Page: 6

KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (FABEC) YTD YTD YTD YTD 2018 2017 2018 2017 Arrival Delay All causes 0.73 0.85 Arrival Delay CRSTMP causes 0.07 0.11 Diff. 2018-2017 - 15 % Diff. 2018-2017 - 38 % Minute ('000) ALL causes 1925 2 207 Minute ('000) CRSTMP causes 189 297 Diff. 2018-2017 - 13 % Diff. 2018-2017 - 36 % Traffic ('000) 2 645 2 589 Diff. 2018-2017 + 2.2 % All Delay Causes CRSTMP Delay Causes 1.20 0.80 0.60 0.40 Yearly Value YTD 0.82 0.82 0.80 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (RP 1) 0.15 0.10 0.05 Yearly Value 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 YTD 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.07 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (RP 1) 1.40 1.20 0.80 0.60 0.40 2017 (All Causes) 2018 (All Causes) Cumulated (YTD) 0.69 0.67 0.68 0.66 0.73 0.79 0.76 0.74 0.75 0.73 0.72 0.73 0.10 2017 (CRSTMP) 2018 (CRSTMP) Cumulated (YTD) 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.02 1.40 1.20 0.80 0.60 0.40 2017 monthly ADM 2018 monthly ADM Monthly 1.17 1.29 1.25 0.90 0.99 1.04 0.86 0.86 0.78 0.82 0.81 0.82 0.69 0.83 0.65 0.70 0.52 0.59 0.59 0.62 0.58 0.62 0.53 0.44 0.30 0.10 2017 monthly CRSTMP 2018 monthly CRSTMP Monthly 0.21 0.19 0.18 0.14 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.08 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.05 Page: 7

ADM due to reason code ( monthly value) Delay due to reason code min. ( monthly value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) 4 800 000 C R S T M P W I... C R S T M P W I... 4 400 000 4 000 000 3 600 000 3 200 000 2 800 000 2 400 000 2 000 000 1 600 000 1 200 000 800 000 400 000 0 Delay due to reason code: 2017 2018 Capacity "C" 2 918 135 4 535 241 Routeing "R" 19 106 5 437 Staffing "S" 1 082 447 3 482 131 Equipment "T" 128 005 165 283 Airspace Mgmt. "M" 134 540 405 358 Special event "P" 252 149 56 758 Weather "W" 1 575 169 3 035 568 Industrial Action "I" 691 985 1 106 565 All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 85 411 297 456 3 000 000 2 500 000 2 000 000 1 500 000 1 000 000 500 000 0 CRSTMP: TOTAL: Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) 4 534 382 8 650 208 6 886 947 13 089 797 All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" 2017 2018 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" 2017 2018 Page: 8

( YTD value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) 7 000 000 6 000 000 5 000 000 4 000 000 3 000 000 2 000 000 1 000 000 Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 44 492 227 152 2 900 22 912 Industrial Action "I" 1 106 565 Weather "W" 42 005 1 213 009 1 075 098 18 141 532 111 155 204 Special event "P" 14 443 1 032 9 214 553 27 612 3 904 Airspace Mgmt. "M" 1 206 310 908 53 124 39 690 430 Equipment "T" 12 179 6 548 122 451 868 13 245 9 992 Staffing "S" 40 504 999 266 1 852 458 524 661 65 242 Routeing "R" 285 684 3 717 730 21 Capacity "C" 11 217 2 526 897 1 472 086 26 642 322 036 176 363 CRSTMP: 79.834 3 845 335 3 513 050 28 063 927 974 255 952 TOTAL: 121 839 5 102 836 5 921 865 49 104 1 482 997 411 156 3.50 3.00 2.50 1.50 0.50 (National) Target All causes Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () 0.08 0.07 0.31 0.24 skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL MUAC skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 0.01 0.07 0.01 Industrial Action "I" 0.34 0.21 Weather "W" 0.06 0.39 0.33 0.03 0.28 0.12 Special event "P" 0.02 0.01 Airspace Mgmt. "M" 0.10 0.02 0.02 Equipment "T" 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.01 Staffing "S" 0.06 0.32 0.57 0.28 0.05 Routeing "R" Capacity "C" 0.02 0.81 0.45 0.04 0.17 0.14 CRSTMP: TOTAL: 0.28 0.16 0.14 (National) Target CRSTMP causes 0.18 0.15 0.12 1.24 1.08 0.04 0.50 0.19 1.64 1.82 0.08 0.79 0.32 0.18 0.23 Page: 9

Brussels Bremen Karlsruhe Langen Munchen Bordeaux Brest Marseille Paris Reims Amsterdam Maastricht Geneva Zurich ( YTD value) Brussels Bremen Karlsruhe Langen Munchen Bordeaux Brest Marseille Paris Reims Amsterdam Maastricht Geneva Zurich min. ( YTD value) Movements KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per controlled flight (ACC) Capacity "C" Routeing "R" Staffing "S" Equipment "T" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Special event "P" Weather "W" Industrial Action "I" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Movements 4 510 000 4 010 000 Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) 4 043 275 2 000 000 1 800 000 3 510 000 3 010 000 2 510 000 2 010 000 1 510 000 1 010 000 649 498 2 876 921 1 003 144 1 263 303 1 482 997 1 600 000 1 400 000 1 200 000 1 000 000 800 000 600 000 400 000 510 000 10 000 121 839 115 412 294 651 268 773 276 089 49 104 113 331 274 914 200 000 Capacity "C" Routeing "R" Staffing "S" Equipment "T" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Special event "P" Weather "W" Industrial Action "I" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 3.00 Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () 2.55 2.50 2.17 1.50 1.22 0.92 0.79 0.50 0.19 0.17 0.49 0.25 0.27 0.23 0.02 0.17 0.33 Page: 10

ADM due to reason code ( monthly value) M M Delay due to reason code min. ( monthly value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per reason code (FABEC) Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) 1 300 000 C R S T M P W I... C R S T M P W I... 1 200 000 1 100 000 1 000 000 900 000 800 000 700 000 600 000 500 000 400 000 300 000 200 000 100 000 Delay due to reason code: 0 2017 2018 Capacity "C" 70 915 50 559 Routeing "R" 0 54 Staffing "S" 33 757 66 339 Equipment "T" 99 163 34 790 Airspace Mgmt. "M" 1 691 3 380 Special event "P" 91 630 34 181 Weather "W" 1 186 743 1 164 647 Industrial Action "I" 15 844 13 287 All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 706 964 557 970 350 000 300 000 250 000 200 000 150 000 100 000 50 000 0 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 CRSTMP: TOTAL: Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) 297 156 2 206 707 2017 2018 Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () 189 303 1 925 207 All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) Industrial Action "I" Weather "W" Special event "P" Airspace Mgmt. "M" Equipment "T" Staffing "S" Routeing "R" Capacity "C" 2017 2018 Page: 11

( YTD value) min. ( YTD value) KPI #2: Arrival ATFM delay per controlled flight (ANSP) 700 000 600 000 500 000 400 000 300 000 200 000 100 000 Absolute ATFM-Delay (min.) ANA LUX skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 708 5 473 116 686 95 216 234 680 105 207 Industrial Action "I" 13 287 Weather "W" 1 823 81 025 349 470 164 585 361 003 206 741 Special event "P" 5 675 5 25 956 2 545 Airspace Mgmt. "M" 942 2 438 Equipment "T" 755 86 504 19 075 13 120 1 250 Staffing "S" 5 759 22 312 15 517 22 751 Routeing "R" 54 Capacity "C" 1 823 5 178 34 547 1 952 7 059 CRSTMP: 755 13 343 27 999 96 037 15 072 36 097 TOTAL: 3 286 99 841 494 155 369 125 610 755 348 045 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 1.50 0.50 (National) Target All causes Average ATFM-Delay per Flight () 0.10 ANA LUX skeyes DFS DSNA LVNL skyguide All others (ex. CRSTMP & WI) 0.02 0.04 0.11 0.10 0.92 0.47 Industrial Action "I" 0.01 (National) Target CRSTMP causes Weather "W" 0.05 0.61 0.33 0.18 1.41 0.92 Special event "P" 0.04 0.03 0.01 Airspace Mgmt. "M" 0.01 Equipment "T" 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.01 Staffing "S" 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.10 Routeing "R" Capacity "C" 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.03 CRSTMP: TOTAL: 0.65 0.09 Target values are dependent on traffic evolution 0.02 0.10 0.03 0.10 0.06 0.16 0.09 0.60 0.15 In fact Target All causes applies to all 4 airports 0.75 0.46 0.40 2.39 1.54 0.50 2.20 0.43 Page: 12

Glossary KPI #1: KPI #1 is set by IR (EU) 390/2013 and is expressed in minutes per flight. For this indicator, the EU-wide target set for each year of RP2 is 0.50 The targets set at FABEC level are as follows for the indicator 'En-route ATFM delay (all regulation causes) per controlled flight' for 2015: 0,48, 2016: 0.42, 2017: 0.42, 2018: 0.42, 2019: 0.43 The targets set at FABEC level are as follows for the indicator 'En-route ATFM delay (CRSTMP regulation causes) per controlled flight' for 2015: 0.37, 2016: 0.33, 2017: 0.33, 2018: 0.33, 2019: 0.34 KPI #2: KPI #2 is set by IR (EU) 390/2013 and is expressed in minutes per flight. For this indicator, no targets have been defined at EU and FABEC level for RP2. The targets have been set at local level. Cause ATC Capacity CODE Guidelines for Application En Route: Demand exceeds or complexity reduces declared or expected ATC capacity Airport: Demand exceeds declared or expected ATC capacity. ATC Industrial Action I Reduction in any capacity due to industrial action by ATC staff ATC Routeings R Network solutions / scenarios used to balance demand and capacity ATC Staffing S Unplanned staff shortage reducing expected capacity. ATC Equipment T Reduction of expected or declared capacity due to the non-availability or degradation of equipment used to provide an ATC service. Accident / Incident Aerodrome Capacity A G Reduction of expected ATC capacity due to an aircraft accident / incident. Reduction in declared or expected capacity due to the degradation or non-availability of infrastructure at an airport. e.g. Work in Progress, shortage of aircraft stands etc. Or when demand exceeds expected aerodrome capacity. Reduced capacity due to the degradation or non-availability of support equipment at an Equipment NON ATC- to be E airport e.g. Fire Service, De-icing / snow removal equipment or other ground handling Aerodrome Services equipment. Industrial Action NON ATC N A reduction in expected / planned capacity due to industrial action by non ATC personnel. Airspace Management Special Event Weather Environmental Issues Other C M P W V O Reduction in declared or expected capacity following changes in airspace / route availability due to small scale military activity. Reduction in planned, declared or expected capacity or when demand exceeds the above capacities as a result of a major sporting, governmental or social event. It may also be used for ATM system upgrades and transitions. Large multinational military exercises may also use this reason. This category should only be used with prior approval during the planning process. Reduction in expected capacity due to any weather phenomena. This includes where weather impacts airport infrastructure capacity, but where aerodrome services are operating as planned / expected. Reduction in any capacity or when demand exceeds any capacity due to agreed local noise, runway usage or similar procedures. This category should only be used with prior agreement in the planning process. This should only be used in exceptional circumstances when no other category is sufficient. An explanatory ANM remark MUST be given to allow post ops analysis. CRSTMP: ATC Capacity (C), ATC Routeings (R), ATC Staffing (S), ATC Equipment (T), Airspace Management (M), Special Event (P); a set of regulation codes which are defined in the Common Charging Scheme Regulation (IR 391/2013) and subject to financial incentive. Note: Arrival figures (traffic and delay) do only include EBBR and EBLG for Belgium and only EHAM for the Netherlands. TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ADM - Average en-route per Movement ATM - Air Traffic Management ANSP - Air Navigation Service Provider PRU - Performance Review Unit ATFM - Air Traffic Flow Management YTD - Year to Date value ANM - Aeronautical Notification Message FPP - FABEC Performace Plan FABEC - Functional Airspace Block Europe Central Page: 13

FABEC Performance Report Capacity: Editor: Sources: Status: December 2018 www.fabec.eu FABEC PMG EUROCONTROL PRU, FABEC ANSPs Notice The FABEC PMG has made every effort to ensure that the information and analysis contained in this document are as accurate and complete as possible. Only information from quoted sources has been used and information relating to named parties has been checked with the parties concerned. Despite these precautions, should you find any errors or inconsistencies we would be grateful if you could please bring them to the FABEC PMGs attention. Page: 14