Phoenix Fund. Amur/ Siberian Tiger Conservation in Verkhnebikinsky Wildlife Refuge. Final report September 2005 February 2006

Similar documents
Amur Tiger Conservation through Education Interim Report February 1 st July 31 st 2012

NORTHERN TIGER PROJECT. January November 2013

[ANTI-POACHING EFFORTS IN FIVE PROTECTED AREAS]

Balkan Lynx Recovery Programme NEWSLETTER 02/2011

ANTI-POACHING ACTIVITIES RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN NORTHERN PRIMORYE, Final Report. Contacts

WWF China Programme Office Amur/Heilong Ecoregion Complex Newsletter Issue 7, Jan to April, 2008

WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION CENTRAL SIKHOTE ALIN (RUSSIAN FEDERATION)

Project Concept Note

AMUR-HEILONG ECO-REGION COMPLEX E-NEWSLETTER

FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

Ecological Corridors: Legal Framework for the Baekdu Daegan Mountain System (South Korea) Katie Miller* Kim Hyun**

Amur/Heilong Ecoregion Complex Newsletter Issue 11, January to April 2009

PROJECT IDENTIFICATION FORM (PIF) PROJECT TYPE: TYPE OF TRUST FUND:

VI. REPORTS ON INDIVIDUAL MONITORING SITES

A GUIDE TO MANITOBA PROTECTED AREAS & LANDS PROTECTION

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland N.B. Unofficial translation. Legally valid only in Finnish and Swedish

Malua Biobank Operations Report. Submitted by the Sabah Forestry Department May June 2009

June 29 th 2015 SOS LEMURS SPECIAL INITIATIVE

Calls for collaboration and volunteering

GLOBAL LEADERS IN BUILDING EFFECTIVE MARINE PROTECTED AREAS

Amur Green Belt. Anna Barma

JOINT REPORT TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Report on the Status of Conservation Actions at the UNESCO World Heritage Property around Lake Baikal (Russian Federation, 754) for 2015 SUMMARY

PROGRESS REPORT ON NIGERIA NATIONAL IVORY ACTION PLAN

Community Wildlife Conservation Award for 2006

Amur/Heilong Eco-region Complex Newsletter

1. 25 local fish observers were identified to assess taimen and Amur sturgeon

Workshop on Guiana Shield Biodiversity Corridor to streamline support for the achievement of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets

Land Use. Grasslands and Rangelands National Parks and Reserves. Thursday, October 9, 14

6. Involving the local population in park management. 7. Involving local NGO s and researchers in park activities and management.

Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal

A call for support against the plans of the Bulgarian Government to allow unsustainable ski projects in Bulgarian National Parks

State of Conservation Report Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal

Land use and natural resource management

Draft LAW. ON SOME AMENDAMENTS IN THE LAW No.9587, DATED ON THE PROTECTION OF BIODIVERSITY AS AMENDED. Draft 2. Version 1.

Forms of Natural Protection in Greece

ABOUT THE COVER PHOTOS

Tiger Alive Initiative s 12 Tiger Landscapes

State of Conservation Report Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal) (N 120)

Hutovo'blato'Nature'Park'and'Mostarsko' blato'as'safe'breeding,'stopeover'and' wintering'sites'for'birds' CEPF'GEM'No.' 66264' Date'of'Report'

THE STOCKHOLM PROCESS 76. Aviation Bans

THE ARUSHA DECLARATION ON REGIONAL CONSERVATION AND COMBATING WILDLIFE/ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

Building sustainable business partnership over protected areas: economic roles in Rwanda and in the region

Mount Nimba Ecosystem

Water quality management in the Lake Baikal region of Russia

Presentation Outline

628: BELOVEZHSKAYA PUSHCHA STATE NATIONAL PARK (BELARUS)

Biosphere Reserves of India : Complete Study Notes

TALVESADAM Port rules

Presented by Long Beach City Attorney s Office Michael Mais, Assistant City Attorney February 17, 2015

Quarterly Newsletter for WWF Caucasus and CEPF jointly supporting biodiversity conservation in the Caucasus

SUSTAINABLE ECOTOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN THE EMBERÁ INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES, CHAGRES NATIONAL PARK, PANAMA

Mainstreaming Biodiversity Considerations into Sustainable Tourism Development & Land Use Planning

Act on Aviation Emissions Trading (34/2010; amendments up to 37/2015 included)

26 TASMANIA 40ºSouth. photo Brendan Gogarty

SEASONAL CAMPGROUND ADMISSION AGREEMENT

LEAFLET FEBRUARY. WWF-Greater Mekong DAWNA TENASSERIM LANDSCAPE. Wayuphong Jitvijak / WWF-Thailand

TABLE 5.1. Emissions of Major Atmospheric Pollutants (in Millions of Metric Tonnes per Year)

Lecture 4: Wilderness: For and Against

Protection and Promotion of Cultural. Input for Country Report July 2015 Prishtina, Kosovo

Ohrid Lake and Prespa Lake, Sub basin s on Crn Drim river basin International Workshop, Sarajevo, Bosna and Hercegovina May 2009

BIKIN RIVER VALLEY (extension of Central Sikhote-Alin)

LOCAL PLAN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE APPALACHIAN TRAIL IN MAINE. (GRAFTON NOTCH TO KATAHDIN) 1 January 2013 (Revised 5 February 2014)

We, Ministers, assembled in Berlin for the International Conference on Biodiversity and Tourism from 6 to 8 March 1997

WORLD NATURAL HERITAGE IN ASIA

Department of Public Safety AST/AWT Overview

KLHQ Fairfield County Emergency Response Plan (August 13, 2012)

STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN MYANMAR. Thein Aung Assistant Director, Nature and Wildlife Conservation Division, Forest Department.

DOWNLOAD OR READ : SOUTH AMERICA ENDANGERED ANIMALS PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

1. World Heritage Property Data. 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value. 3. Factors Affecting the Property Other factor(s) Page 1

RHINOS WITHOUT BORDERS

Director General of Civil Aviation Authority of the Republic of Kosovo,

LANSING HERITAGE SITE HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLANNING

Mikaela Weisse Scott Kloeck-Jenson Fellowship report Travel Award (2014) Lima, Peru

BABIA GÓRA DECLARATION ON SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN MOUNTAIN AREAS

Reforestation with the Penan Tribe with Moving Mountains in Borneo. Information Guide February Photo by Kristine May

Side and social events during the sixteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties. Bangkok (Thailand), 3-14 March 2013

CODE OF CONDUCT. Corporate Compliance 10.9 Effective: 12/17/13 Reviewed: 1/04/17 Revised: 1/04/17

MARINE PROTECTED AREA IN MALAYSIA

Local economic development through gorilla tourism. Developing and testing new pro-poor tourism products and services around Bwindi forest in Uganda

tiger. timeline

Kosovo Roadmap on Youth, Peace and Security

2 cases from Estonia: one for good and one for bad

TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST

Global Warming in New Zealand

Order of the Minister of Environment #39, August 22, 2011 Tbilisi

REDD+ IN YUCATAN PENINSULA

Cedar Run Wildlife Refuge s GO WILD Summer Camp Guide 2019

SPECIAL SUB-COMMITTEE OF THE LEGAL COMMITTEE FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF THE TOKYO CONVENTION INCLUDING THE ISSUE OF UNRULY PASSENGERS SECOND MEETING

Proposal to the African Elephant Fund

Information concerning the change in the cockpit access regulation

Balkan Lynx Recovery Programme Spartak Koçi, Bledi Hoxha & Aleksandër Trajçe Shkodra, 13/05/2016

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,058 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, GARY KENDALL RIVERA, Appellant.

Overview of Protected Areas Management in Nepal. Hari Bhadra Acharya Under Secretary Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Nepal

JANDAKOT AIRPORT HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN

$850,000 Awarded to 20 Organizations

Nature conservation, protected areas & ecological connectivity

APPENDIX 'A' Summary of Sage Grouse Petitions Submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1 (As of January 8, 2004)

Protected Area Management Effectiveness Nepal s Experience

Transcription:

Phoenix Fund Amur/ Siberian Tiger Conservation in Verkhnebikinsky Wildlife Refuge Final report September 2005 February 2006 Vladivostok 2006

Grantor: Project Name: INTERIM REPORT September 2005 February 2006 21 st Century Tiger Amur/ Siberian Tiger Conservation in Verkhnebikinsky Wildlife Refuge The Phoenix Fund Grantee: Report Period: September 2005 February 2006 Grant Period: September 2005 August 2006 I. Project Background Verkhnebikinsky wildlife refuge The upper Bikin has the last large virgin stands of the original Korean Pine forests that dominated Primorye. It is home to the largest tribe of indigenous people (the Udege), based in Krasny Yar village on the middle part of the Bikin River, and is important habitat for the Amur tiger, as well as other animals (e.g., wild boar, Asiatic black bear, Brown bear, sable, Siberian weasel, squirrel, badger, lynx, mink, hare, otter, Siberian stag, hazel grouse, wood grouse and storks on the lower Bikin). For the last three decades the number of Amur tigers inhabiting this area has been varying from 30 to 50 animals. It means that about 1/6 of the Amur tiger population concentrates on this territory. The uppermost part of the Bikin is not a great tiger habitat, but the middle to upper section is prime, and is at threat if logging opens up this basin, which is the intent of the Primorsky Krai Administration. Verkhnebikinsky wildlife refuge was created on September 15, 1998 and then Primorsky Governor has taken several attempts to liquidate it. If we let woodcutting in Verkhnebikinsky wildlife refuge and in the Bikin valley then people would never see virgin taiga in its original state. Many people do not understand that it is a unique world treasure, that it is the last remnant of Sikhote-Alin in the Far East. It should be preserved. In 2005 thanks to support from the 21 st Century Tiger Phoenix managed to strengthen protection of the Verkhnebikinsky wildlife refuge by creating two teams of state law enforcement officers and public rangers. From September 2005 to February 2006 Phoenix continued implementing the project the objective of which is to ensure Amur tiger habitat protection and population survival in the North of Primorsky region, including: Strengthening protection activities in tiger habitat by carrying out joint patrols consisting of state law enforcement officers and anti-poaching environmental investigation teams; Gaining in support from the local people and getting them directly involved in conservation work. The mission of tiger conservation project is to protect the region s biodiversity by: Conducting regular patrols and arresting poachers, Working with local communities 2

II. Project description Legal protection Illegal woodcutting revealed during the patrol by helicopter Since 2005 federal legislation modifications have made almost all wildlife reserves in Primorsky krai unprotected. Moreover, on September 15, 2005 the Governor of Primorsky krai signed a decree 205-pа that called into question existence of wildlife refuges and their roles in wildlife and habitat conservation. According to that decree it was allowed, for example, to conduct exploration work and mining, house and road building and research work in Verkhnebikinsky wildlife refuge. It meant that any work was allowed in the only remaining unique place with its virgin taiga where large-scale woodcutting had never been carried out. The last of the biggest virgin pine and broad-leaved forest in the world is conserved there. The Governor s decision aroused indignation among public and environmental NGOs. Such a decision was illegal because it ought have been taken only after government and public Environmental Assessment Review. In accordance with the legislation in force, felling projects and plans shall be approved only after they receive a favorable judgment on the part of the public ecological expertise. Rosprirodnadzor 1 and local NGOs including the Phoenix Fund sent the letter to the Prosecutor s Office to inform about this violation. Besides, the environmentalists distributed this information with photographs illustrating environmental violations in the refuge among local mass media to raise public awareness about illegal actions. The Primorsky Environmental Prosecutor brought an action against the Governor s decision and on November 15, 2005 the decree was declared invalid. But Primorsky krai administration appealed against a court decision. The case is to be continued The Phoenix Fund in cooperation with other NGOs continues defending human rights, especially rights of indigenous people (Udege), to favorable environment and supports their efforts to create the territory of traditional nature use in the Bikin valley. Thus, Verkhnebikinsky wildlife refuge and the territory of traditional nature use will create favorable conditions for Amur tiger conservation. Field activities Leskhoz (forestry) state forest management unit, providing control over forest management, forest protection, reforestation, etc. A joint team of rangers and police officers is going to conduct a patrol 1 Rosprirodnadzor - Primorsky Department of Federal Nature Use Service 3

For the reported period two teams of state law enforcement officers and public rangers conducted 27 checkouts, including 8 bases with chipping headrig and 19 logging sites with log stockyards. Besides, the rangers checked 154 vehicles transporting wood and revealed 24 violations in documents authorising woodcutting. The team members also organized 12 meetings with Pozharsky district administration, leskhozes members and local people to inform them about current situation in the forest and involve them in forest conservation work. During the meetings the rangers distributed informative booklets on Verkhnebikinsky wildlife refuge. During the last patrol in February a joint team of public and law enforcement rangers and officers of Economic Crime Police Department used the Mi-2, a small, lightly armored transport helicopter. The patrol was conducted over Pozharsky, Krasnoarmeisky and Dalnerechensky districts with focus on the territory of Verkhnebikinsky wildlife refuge. One month earlier the team has received information about 23 sites needed checking. As a result, the team revealed five violations, confiscated 30 cubic meters of oak and lime-tree. For the reported period the rangers faced Illegal woodcutting following problems in forest conservation: 1. Criminals use front men and pay them money (from 500 to 1,000 USD) to conduct woodcutting in such a way that people do not think they are doing anything wrong or illegal. As a result, when law enforcement officers arrest such men, all confiscated equipment are returned to the owners who are often directly engaged in illegal woodcutting. Thus, there is an atmosphere of permissiveness and impunity among local population. In 2005 no one received a real punishment for forest violations. 2. Mostly, local population consists of close friends and relatives. There are a lot of cases when people responsible for investigation of forest violation arrest their relatives or friends and then let them go without punishment. 3. As a rule, the main violators in timber industry are forestry s staff. They allow loggers to exceed quotas for cuts, provide them with permits and illegal felling tickets (official documents giving the right to cut a certain amount of wood on a certain area of forest), overlook violations by loggers and they are often negligent of their duties. For example, in October 2005 the team arrested workers of Roschinsky leskhoz (forestry) who instead of conducting maintenance cuts harvested wood for commercial purpose. 4. There is no base to store confiscated wood. A lot of cases were registered Ranger takes measurements when confiscated logs disappeared at night and, as a result, the rangers could not initiate criminal proceedings. 4

5. Traditionally, there are a number of stationary posts where the rangers patrol to prevent and reveal forest violations. But illegal loggers often drive over such posts by pass roads. Sometimes, violators pay money (100 USD for one vehicle with wood) to go through the post. There are several measures that can help to prevent illegal logging in the Bikin valley: 1. Involve in patrols the officers from Rescue and Recovery Service, Rosselkhoznadzor 1, Rosprirodnadzor, and specialists from Primorsky krai administration. 2. Organize patrols by plane to gather information not only on forest violations, but also on violations in river basins. 3. Gather and exchange information on illegal logging. 1 Rosselkhoznadzor - Primorsky Department of Federal Service for Veterinarian and Vegetation Sanitary Supervision 5