PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

Similar documents
PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

SES Performance Scheme

Performance Indicator Horizontal Flight Efficiency

Performance Planning Environment. Bernhard Mayr, CM Financial and Performance Committee, 23 May 2014

European Performance Scheme

ATM in Europe It s all about Performance

Network Manager Adding value to the Network 29 September 2011

ANNEX ANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU).../...

ATC Global 2014 航空运输业的可持续发展. The Sustainable Development of the Air Transport Industry. Robin Deransy

Performance Planning Operations: Environment. Bernhard Mayr, CM TF Performance, MoT Germany 20 May 2011

EUROCONTROL General Presentation

Efficiency and Automation

Efficiency and Environment KPAs

Flight Efficiency Initiative

Different views on Performance

EU Report. Europe SEPTEMBER 2018

Network Management, building on our experience of flow management and network planning.

NO FLIGHT EFFICIENCY USER MANUAL. Network Manager

NETWORK OPERATIONS - FLIGHT EFFICIENCY USER MANUAL. Network Manager

ATM Network Performance Report

ELEVENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE. Montreal, 22 September to 3 October 2003

Follow up to the implementation of safety and air navigation regional priorities XMAN: A CONCEPT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ATFCM CROSS-BORDER EXCHANGES

Performance fabec air navigation service providers

Analysis of vertical flight efficiency during climb and descent

Analysis of en-route vertical flight efficiency

Agenda. Institutional Arrangements Structures Procedures Example of TSA200 FUA at Regional Level

Single European Sky Benefits for the airline industry. Warsaw, 28 November 2011

2010 US/Europe comparison of ATM-related operational performance

Network Operations Performance

John Gulding Manager, Strategic Analysis and Benchmarking, FAA. Hartmut Koelman Senior Expert, Performance review Unit, EUROCONTROL

Aviation Safety Information Leaflet (ASIL) AIRSPACE INFRINGEMENTS Analysis of the pilot questionnaires V.1.3

Comparison of Air Traffic Management-Related Operational Performance: U.S./Europe

ICAO EUR Region Performance Framework. (ICAO EUR Doc 030)

2017 Overview and 2018 Outlook

Civil-Military Cooperation. Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace

DANUBE FAB real-time simulation 7 November - 2 December 2011

Monitoring Report: AIRAC July August No 03/1203. Edition: AIRAC 1203

The Network Manager User Forum 2017

Hosted by General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA)

% change vs. Dec ALL VISITS (000) 2,410 12% 7,550 5% 31,148 1% Spend ( million) 1,490 15% 4,370-1% 18,710 4%

ICAO ATFM SEMINAR. Dubai, UAE, 14 December 2016

ANNUAL NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT Main Report

Dynamic Management. of the. European Airspace Network. ADR Data Catalogue. Annex A: Supported Services

Dynamic Airspace Overview concepts, complexities, benefits and outlook

PROCESS FOR DEVELOPING RP2 IN RESPECT OF THE UK Workshop

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS FROM IMPROVED OPERATIONAL MEASURES. Guido Kerkhofs Director ATM Programmes EUROCONTROL

PRR Performance Review Report. An Assessment of Air Traffic Management in Europe during the Calendar Year Performance Review Commission

Free Route Airspace (FRA) Application in NMOC - Guidelines

EU Report. Europe AUGUST 2017

CANSO Workshop on Operational Performance. LATCAR, 2016 John Gulding Manager, ATO Performance Analysis Federal Aviation Administration

EUROCONTROL. Visit of the Transport Attachés. 10 April Frank Brenner. Director General EUROCONTROL

Indicator development: how could we improve existing indicators and which new ones do we need?

XXXXX FACTS AND FIGURES THE ESSENTIALS

Concept of Operations Workshop

Customer Relations Programme

The Netherlands Performance Plan RP

Operational Performance Workgroup. John Gulding Manager, Strategic Analysis and Benchmarking, ATO Office of Performance Analysis, FAA

EU Report. Europe JULY 2018

De-peaking Lufthansa Hub Operations at Frankfurt Airport

Free Route Airspace (FRA) Application in NMOC - Guidelines

Workshop on the Performance Enhancement of the ANS through the ICAO ASBU framework. Dakar, Senegal, September 2017 presented by Emeric Osmont

The European Experience Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

EU Report. Europe JANUARY 2017

Additional ASMA Time Performance Indicator document

Performance Review Body 18

SECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS

InterFAB Ops meeting Traffic volatility in Brussels hotspot sectors

The SES Performance Scheme. ICAO Regional Performance Framework Workshop Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan May 2013

Report. Introduction. Plenary Session

FLIGHT EFFICIENCY PLAN ANNUAL REPORT

How CFSPs work. processes, requirements, difficulties. Tuesday, June 19th, 2018 CFPSG PRESENTATION FABEC SC OPS/AOG RADISSON ZURICH AIRPORT 1

EU Report. Europe MAY 2017

AMAN RESEARCH IN SESAR

Report on the Operation of the Route Charges System in Central Route Charges Office (CRCO)

Review of current KPIs and proposal for new ones

EUROCONTROL and the Airport Package

SESAR ANNUAL DEMO WORKSHOP. Toulouse, October 2014 TOPLINK 1 & 2 Daniel MULLER, TOPLINK PM

International Civil Aviation Organization WORLDWIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE (ATCONF) SIXTH MEETING. Montréal, 18 to 22 March 2013

Clustering radar tracks to evaluate efficiency indicators Roland Winkler Annette Temme, Christoph Bösel, Rudolf Kruse

FACT Sheet. General information. January Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre

The flow centric approach :

ORGANISER HOST LEAD SPONSOR

Forty years of vision. The EUROCONTROL Maastricht UAC story. years of vision EUROCONTROL MAASTRICHT UAC EUROCONTROL

HOLIDAYS SUMMERS ABTO/WES PANEL RESEARCH growth. index %

ICAO EUR REGION APPROACH TO THE DEFINITION OF A PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK

EUROCONTROL REVIEW OF CIVIL MILITARY COORDINATION AND COOPERATION ARRANGEMENTS

Monitoring Report: AIRAC March March No 03/1203. Edition: AIRAC 1203

Interim results. 11 May 2010

Air Transportation Optimization. Information Sharing for Global Benefits

Review of current KPIs and proposal for new ones

ATM Network Performance Report

EU Report. Europe APRIL 2018

European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Central Route Charges Office (CRCO) Report on the Operation of the Route Charges System in 2016

EU Report. Europe OCTOBER 2016

Space Based ADS-B. Transforming the Way you See the Sky February, 2015

Civil Aviation Agency of Latvia

Transcription:

PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015-2019 ENVIRONMENT July 2018

Contents Description & Analysis 3 KPI #1: KEA/HFE at FABEC level (excl. 10 best/worst days) PI #1: HFE based on Actual at FABEC level (incl. all days) PI #2: KEP/HFE based on filed FPL at FABEC level (excl. 10 best/worst days) PI #3: HFE based on filed FPL at FABEC level (incl. all days) PI #4: HFE based on Actual at State level (incl. all days) PI #5: HFE based on filed FPL at State level (incl. all days) 4 4 5 5 6 7 PI #6: ASMA PI #7: atxot PI #8: Effectiveness of Booking Procedure for FUA PI #9: Effectiveness of SUA usage Glossary 8 Page: 2

Description & Analysis ENV KPI #1: KEA at FABEC level (excl. 10 best/worst days) Confirming the trend observed for the last 4 months, the inefficiency of flown trajectories on the horizontal plain is increasing with a value of 3.25%, stopping positive trend observed until March. The indicator is at 0.20pp above the yearly target (3.05%), and the trend is not downwards, taking into account the increase of traffic by 2.40% in FABEC in July 2018 compared to July 2017. The difference between KEA and KEP is 2.77pp, small increased value (+0.02pp) compared to previous month. Very severe delays were experienced in July (doubled compared to 2017), for which the three main reasons were capacity and weather, and staffing to a lesser extent. In case of important ATFM delays, the interdependency between delays and HFE become more and more obvious. ENV PI#1: HFE based on Actual at FABEC level (including all days) On a monthly basis, HFE (KEA including all days) has reached 3.42%, which is a quite comparable with the previous month (3.52%) and which confirms reversal of the trend observed up until March 2018. Compared to July 2017 (3.36%), it represents an increase of the inefficiency values by 0.06pp. ENV PI#2: HFE based on Filed FPL at FABEC level (excl. 10 best/worst days) After a period of stabilization, reaching its lowest level (5.94%) in March, the indicator keeps showing a reversal of the trend, and goes over the bar of 6% for the second consecutive month. The value is now clearly above the value of July 2017 (6.02% vs 5.98%). In an international context where traffic is still growing (+3.7% for Europe), FABEC delays in July 2018 are much higher than delays in July 2017 (all cause en-route delays reached 4.45 min per flight this month vs 2.57 min in July 2017). In such conditions, Aircraft Operators filed longer routes. Delays were the main reasons for longer routes, due to capacity, weather, and staffing. Moreover, NM measures linked to the 4ACC initiative forced some flows to use longer routes. Reminder 1: In the 2018 context with almost harmonized unit rates in FABEC, meaning that the shortest route is the cheapest route most of the time, KEP should globally improve, but it is not the case, because of interdependency with ATFM. Reminder 2: The 2018 context should also favor KEP because en-route traffic (steady traffic = +2.6%) is growing more than evolving traffic (+1.7%) for July over FABEC area. Here again, interdependencies are affecting KEP. ENV PI#3: HFE based on Filed FPL at FABEC level (including all days) Compared to same value of 2017, the figure is showing a deterioration for July (6.05% vs 5.88% monthly, and 6.08% vs 5.97% for YTD). The results cannot be considered as bad results (especially YTD) taking into account that delays in July 2018 are doubled compared to delays of the same month of 2017 (+1.88 per flight for all causes, but +1.62 per flight for CRSTMP). ENV PI#4: HFE based on Actual at State level (including all days) At national level, the figures of YTD for all states show a small increase of the inefficiency compared to the same month of 2017 (except for The Netherlands with a small improvement). On a monthly basis, the inefficiency value is increasing for all states, except for The Netherlands (-0.09pp), and Germany (-0.07pp) with the following results: Belgium (+0.21pp), Switzerland (+0.12pp), and France (+0.14pp). The increase of the KEA value at FABEC level seems equally shared amongst all states. As a reminder, do not forget that PI#4 is impacted by HFE based on Filed FPL at State level (PI#5). ENV PI#5: HFE based on Filed FPL at State level (including all days) At national level, the figures of YTD for all states are globally similar to the figures of the same month of 2017. On a monthly basis, the inefficiency is increasing for all states except for The Netherlands with the following results: Belgium (+0.36pp), The Netherlands (+0.00pp), Switzerland (+0.20pp), France (+0.17pp) and Germany (+0.16pp). In addition to the delays, these figures are showing an impact of the 4ACC initiative for Belgium, Germany and France. Page: 3

KPI #1: KEA/HFE at FABEC level (excl. 10 best/worst days) 3.80% KEA Yearly Value ( - ) KEA 12M rolling avg. FABEC Yearly Target 3.60% 3.20% 3.24% 3.34% 3.30% 3.25% 3.22% 3.43% 3.29% 3.23% 3.25% 3.14% 3.05% 2.96% 2.80% (RP 1) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 KEA 12M rolling avg. 2017/2016 KEA 12M rolling avg. 2018/2017 FABEC YEARLY TARGET 2018 3.80% 3.60% 3.29% 3.27% 3.26% 3.24% 3.23% 3.22% 3.22% 3.21% 3.22% 3.23% 3.25% 3.25% 3.20% 2.80% PI #1: HFE based on Actual at FABEC level (incl. all days) 3.80% 3.60% 3.20% 3.07% 3.04% 3.15% 3.27% 3.53% 3.52% 3.42% 2.80% 3.80% 3.60% 3.20% 3.07% 3.05% 3.09% 3.14% 3.24% 3.29% 3.32% 2.80% Page: 4

PI #2: KEP/HFE based on filed FPL at FABEC level (excl. 10 best/worst days) 6.60% 6.40% KEP Yearly Value ( - ) KEP 12M rolling avg. 6.20% 6.15% 6.13% 6.12% 6.08% 6.14% 5.95% 5.98% 6.02% 5.80% (RP 1) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 KEP 12M rolling avg. 2017/2016 KEP 12M rolling avg. 2018/2017 6.60% 6.40% 6.20% 5.97% 5.97% 5.97% 5.96% 5.95% 5.95% 5.95% 5.94% 5.96% 5.97% 6.02% 5.80% PI #3: HFE based on filed FPL at FABEC level (incl. all days) 6.60% 6.40% 6.20% 5.97% 5.95% 6.01% 6.08% 6.21% 6.21% 6.05% 5.80% 6.60% 6.40% 6.20% 5.97% 5.96% 5.98% 6.01% 6.05% 6.09% 6.08% 5.80% Page: 5

PI #4: HFE based on Actual at State level (incl. all days) 4.50% 3.50% 3.86% 3.91% 3.77% 3.94% 3.68% 3.59% 3.56% Belgium 3.56% 3.63%3.84% 4.15% 4.11% 4.12% 3.43% 3.26% 3.37% 3.46% 3.19% 3.18%3.20% 3.69% 3.67% 3.58% 3.25% 3.19% 3.16% France 3.50% 2.68% 2.67% 2.71% 2.75% 2.84%2.89% 2.90% 2.68% 2.78% 2.87% 3.10% 3.08% 2.95% 2.66% Germany 2.50% 2.99% 2.96%2.99% 3.02% 2.88% 2.92% 2.90% 3.02% 3.08% 3.10% 2.93% 2.97% 2.73% Netherlands 4.46% 4.50%4.53% 4.49% 4.56% 4.62% 4.63% Switzerland 4.46% 4.54% 4.59% 4.38% 4.78% 4.83% 4.67% Page: 6

PI #5: HFE based on filed FPL at State level (incl. all days) 8.00% 7.50% 7.41% 7.18% 7.24% 7.33% 7.39% 7.40% 7.19% Belgium 8.00% 7.50% 7.56% 7.62% 7.47% 7.18% 7.21%7.32% 7.37% 5.97% 5.94% 5.95% 6.07% 6.11% 6.10% 5.98% 6.11% 6.30% 6.25% 5.97% 6.06% 5.90% 5.50% France 5.50% 5.79% 5.80% 5.82% 5.82% 5.81% 5.81% 5.81% 5.79% 5.81% 5.85% 5.79% 5.80% 5.87% 5.74% 5.50% Germany 5.50% 4.97% 4.97% 4.97% 5.01%5.07% 5.12% 5.14% 4.97% 4.97% 5.11% 5.28% 4.96% 5.31% 5.24% Netherlands 9.00% 9.00% 8.00% 7.71% 7.73% 7.74% 7.77% 7.83% 7.73% 7.81% 7.71% 7.75% 7.76% 7.90% 8.02% 8.00% 7.69% 7.74% Switzerland Page: 7

Glossary KEP / KEA definition KEP compares the length of the en route section of the last filed flight plan Lp with the corresponding Achieved p of the great circle distance. KEA compares the length of the en route section of the actual trajectory La with the corresponding Achieved a of the great circle distance. KEP is the reference for SES-wide improvement with a global target set by the European Commission. KEA is the reference for FAB improvements with individual targets set by the European Commission. Achieved distance calculation 4 reference points are identified for KEP/KEA calculation : The Origin and Destination points are the targets of the trajectory and the reference points for the Great Circle: the airports inside the SES area when the airports are outside the SES area, they are the trajectory point at the SES border The entry and exit points are the first and last points of the part of the trajectory considered within a FAB: the point on the 40NM circle around departure or arrival airport the point on the border with the previous/next FAB TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS ADEP - Airport of Departure ADES - Airport od Destination ANSP - Air Navigation Service Provider PRU - Performance Review Unit ATFM - Air Traffic Flow Management YTD - Year to Date value FABEC - Functional Airspace Block Europe Central FPP - FABEC Performace Plan TMA - Terminal Manoeuvring Area, delimited by a 40 NM circle around the origin and destination airport. Page: 8

FABEC Performance Report Environment: Editor: Sources: Status: July 2018 www.fabec.eu FABEC PMG EUROCONTROL PRU (http://ansperformance.eu/ ), FABEC ANSPs Notice The FABEC PMG has made every effort to ensure that the information and analysis contained in this document are as accurate and complete as possible. Only information from quoted sources has been used and information relating to named parties has been checked with the parties concerned. Despite these precautions, should you find any errors or inconsistencies we would be grateful if you could please bring them to the FABEC PMGs attention. Page: 9