Date: 23 Jul 2016 Time: 1125Z Position: 5137N 00146W Location: IVO Swindon

Similar documents
Date: 01 Aug 2016 Time: 1344Z Position: 5441N 00241W

Date: 29 Apr 2017 Time: 1119Z Position: 5226N 00112W Location: 10nm ENE Coventry

Date: 19 Jun 2016 Time: 1211Z Position: 5228N 00216W Location: IVO Wolverhampton

Date: 18 Jul 2016 Time: 1441Z Position: 5112N 00128W Location: Picket Piece, Hampshire

Time: 1111Z Position: 5049N 00016W Location: 1nm SE Brighton City Airport

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

Date: 01 Jun 2018 Time: 0959Z Position: 5121N 00048W Location: 6nm N Farnborough

Date: 12 Apr 2017 Time: 1732Z Position: 5123N 00028W Location: Heli-route 3

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 7 Dec Z (Saturday)

AIRPROX REPORT No Date: 17 Apr 2015 Time: 1345Z Position: 5243N 00253W Location: Nesscliff PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 18 Aug Z

Date: 14 Aug 2018 Time: 1443Z Position: 5225N 00040E

Date: 14 Jun 2017 Time: 1600Z Position: 5121N 00102W Location: 7nm NW Blackbushe airport

Date: 14 Jun 2017 Time: 1513Z Position: 5101N 00251W Location: Curry Rivel

RV6 800ft aal 24:27 24:39 25:03 24:51

Date: 9 Dec 2015 Time: 1503Z Position: 5417N 00039W Location: Vale of York AIAA

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 14 Jul Z (Sunday) (6.7nm SE of Brize Norton) Airspace: Brize Norton CTR (Class: D)

THE GLIDER PILOTS: Despite extensive tracing action, none of the glider pilots could be identified.

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 9 Sep Z. (6nm N Linton on Ouse) Airspace: Vale of York AIAA (Class: G)

CPA 1711:56 R44 A15 EC135 A14 100ft V 0.2nm H. Wolverhampton Halfpenny Green

Paraglider (not radar derived) Reported CPA 0836:58

Date: 07 Feb 2018 Time: 1547Z Position: 5317N 00043W Location: W Scampton

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 27 Aug Z. (5nm NE Coventry Airport) Airspace: London FIR (Class: G)

AIRPROX REPORT No

AIRPROX REPORT No Date: 05 Apr 2018 Time: 1451Z Position: 5128N 00058W Location: Reading PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 17 Jul Z. (5nm NE Silverstone) Airspace: Lon FIR (Class: G)

Date: 29 Jun 2018 Time: 1502Z Position: 5325N 00312W Location: 5nm NW Liverpool Airport

Date: 23 May 2017 Time: 1019Z Position: 5443N 00244W Location: 10nm south Carlisle Airport

Date: 4 Jun 2015 Time: 1009Z Position: 5155N 00209W Location: Gloucestershire

Date: 9 Jul 2015 Time: 1417Z Position: 5311N 00031W Location: Cranwell visual circuit.

Date: 21 May 2015 Time: 1951 (Twilight) Position: 5132N 00004W Location: Victoria Park London

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 22 May Z. (2.5nm WNW Gloucester/Staverton) Airspace: Lon FIR (Class: G)

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 20 Dec Z

Date: 09 Apr 2017 Time: 1305Z Position: 5357N 00245W Location: 2nm east of Cockerham

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 31 May Z (Saturday)

Date: 16 Jan 2018 Time: 1227Z Position: 5128N 00025W Location: Heathrow airport

Date: 23 Aug 2017 Time: 0753Z Position: 5111N 00033W Location: near Godalming

Radar derived Levels show Mode C 1013mb 27:52 PA :32 27:16 037

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 26 Jul Z 5133N 00106W (3nm FIN APP RW01 Benson - elev 203ft) Airspace: MATZ/FIR (Class: G)

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 11 Mar Z

Date: 25 Apr 2016 Time: 1714Z Position: 5107N 00024W Location: 10nm W Gatwick airport

CPA2 1256: ft V/2.8nm H

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 12 Jan Z. (White Waltham elev 133ft) Airspace: White Waltham ATZ (Class: G)

Date: 27 Jun 2018 Time: 0919Z Position: 5331N 00030W Location: ivo Hibaldstow parachuting site

EMB :40 A43 A38 A35 A34 43:28 A29

Date: 08 Dec 2016 Time: 1628Z (Twilight) Position: 5114N 00049W Location: 3nm SW Farnborough

Primary. Contact 1. CPA 1535:31 100ft V/0.2nm H. Primary

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 10 Oct Z. (North Weald Base Leg RW02 LH - elev 321ft) Airspace: Lon FIR (Class: G)

Date: 27 Jun 2018 Time: 1510Z Position: 5257N 00033W Location: Barkston Heath

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 28 Jun Z (Saturday)

Radar derived Levels show Mode C 1013hPa M185 FL : : :10 F406

Date: 26 Jan 2018 Time: 1233Z Position: 5116N 00208W Location: Bratton Camp launch site 1

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

C560X. Tutor(A) Tutor(B) AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 1 Apr Z 5144N 00115W (15nm N CPT) Airspace: Oxford AIAA (Class: G)

Radar derived Levels show

CPA 0833: ft V 0.4nm H F186 F189 F173 33:16 F175

C :34 A62 14:14 A50 LTMA

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 1 May Z. (9nm SW Southend) Airspace: Lon FIR (Class: G)

Total Risk A Risk B Risk C Risk D Risk E Airspace (Class) Cranwell ATZ (G) London FIR (G) London FIR (G) London FIR (G) London FIR (G)

Assessment Summary Sheet for UKAB Meeting on 22 nd Jul 2015

B :50 A :50 A12 07:10 A12 A12 07:26 A13 A14

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 11 Jul Z. (9.4nm WSW RAF Linton-on-Ouse) Airspace: Vale of York AIAA (Class: G)

SAFETYSENSE LEAFLET AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES OUTSIDE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE

GENERAL INFORMATION Aircraft #1 Aircraft #2

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 16 Feb Z. Douglas Platform - elev 146ft) Airspace: Liverpool Bay HTZ (Class: G)

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A00Q0116 RISK OF COLLISION

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 7 Sep Z. of Culdrose - Helford River) Airspace: CMATZ (Class: G)

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 31 Oct Z. NNW of Wyton - elev 135ft) Airspace: London FIR/ATZ (Class: G)

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

AIRPROX REPORT No

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

SAFETY BULLETIN. One Level of Safety Worldwide Safety Bulletin No. 05SAB004 5 July 2004

ENR 1.14 AIR TRAFFIC INCIDENTS

helicopter? Fixed wing 4p58 HINDSIGHT SITUATIONAL EXAMPLE

Chapter 6. Brize Radar, Speedbird 213 Heavy, request radar advisory. Speedbird 123 change call sign to BA 123

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 24 Sep Z (Saturday) N of Shoreham Airport - elev 7ft) Airspace: London FIR (Class: G)

Investigation Report

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

VFR PHRASEOLOGY. The word IMMEDIATELY should only be used when immediate action is required for safety reasons.

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 6 Mar Z. finals RW19 at Valley - elev 36ft) Airspace: Valley AIAA/FIR (Class: G)

Assessment Summary Sheet for UKAB Meeting on 9 th October 2013

Contents. Subpart A General 91.1 Purpose... 7

ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SHEET FOR UKAB MEETING ON 15 Dec 2010

SECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

CHAPTER 4 AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 28 Nov Z. (RAF Valley 120 /9nm) Airspace: Valley AIAA (Class: G)

Air Traffic Services and Airspace

CHAPTER 6:VFR. Recite a prayer (15 seconds)

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Number April 2016

AIRSPACE INFRINGEMENTS

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. Between. and RELATING TO

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Transcription:

AIRPROX REPORT No 2016143 Date: 23 Jul 2016 Time: 1125Z Position: 5137N 00146W Location: IVO Swindon PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB Recorded Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Aircraft Arcus Glider A400 Operator Civ Pte HQ Air (Ops) Airspace Lon FIR Lon FIR Class G G Rules VFR IFR Service None Traffic Provider NA Brize Altitude/FL NK 2600ft Transponder Off A, C,S Reported Colours Red, White White Lighting Conditions VMC VMC Visibility 10km Altitude/FL 2300ft 2800ft Altimeter RPS (1019hPa) QNH (1016hPa) Heading 100 040 Speed 65kt 250kt ACAS/TAS FLARM TCAS II Alert None None Separation Reported 200ftV/500m H 300ft V/0.25nm H Recorded NK THE GLIDER PILOT reports that he was in the Swindon area when he saw an A400, which appeared to descend out of cloud. The aircraft could clearly be heard, and visual contact was attained when it was in the 4 o clock position about 1km away. It appeared to be taking an avoiding-action left turn, with a turn of 20 AOB, it passed behind then reversed its turn onto 070. He assessed the risk of collision as None. THE A400 PILOT reports that he was conducting an approach to Brize Norton, it was a busy VMC day with good weather and convective CU cloud and there was an abundance of GA traffic being called by air traffic and seen on TCAS. Both the PM and PF were visually tracking two light-aircraft that were lower than the A400. At approximately 15nm south-west of the airfield, whilst skirting a broken cloud-base at 2800ft, a glider was spotted in the 12:30 position with about 300ft vertical and 0.25nm horizontal separation. The glider was in a left-hand turn away from them, and the A400 pilot carried out a hard-left emergency-break turn to avoid it. He then elected to descend to circuit height, below the cloud base and into better visibility to deconflict from the GA traffic. He assessed the risk of collision as Medium. THE BRIZE APPROACH CONTROLLER reports that the A400 was recovering from the south-west at 2800ft for a visual downwind join, and was receiving a Traffic Service. The airspace was very busy with primary-only contacts as well as those with SSR showing on the radar. Traffic Information was passed on a 7000 squawk and then further information passed on an extremely small and slow moving primary-only track. The controller then turned his attention to another inbound aircraft and found that he was calling a lot of Traffic Information in a short space of time to the two aircraft. After the A400 entered the Brize CTR the pilot stated they had seen a glider and it was close, but there 1

was no mention of an Airprox. Shortly afterwards a glider pilot called on the VHF frequency to declare an Airprox against a large aircraft recovering to Brize. He perceived the severity of the incident as Medium. THE BRIZE ATCO I/C reports that he was seated next to the Approach controller at the time of the incident. Both controllers were working hard in medium-to-high levels of traffic, and the airspace around was very busy with multiple contacts who were believed to be gliders. The Approach controller gave Traffic Information on a primary-only contact, and the A400 pilot reported that he had flown close to a glider. The glider pilot wasn t on the Brize frequencies, but called up on the RT after the event to report an Airprox and subsequently telephoned later. Factual Background The weather at Brize was recorded as follows: METAR EGVN 231050Z 26004KT 9999 SCT038 24/14 Q1020 BLU NOSIG= Portions of the tape transcripts between Brize Norton Director, the A400, Brize Zone and the glider pilot are below: To From Speech Transcription Time {A400 c/s} further traffic twelve o clock five miles manoeuvring indicating one 11:24:50 A400 DIR thousand four hundred feet below and further traffic again twelve o clock five miles crossing left to right no height information very slow moving DIR A400 {A400 c/s} is searching for both 11:25:02 A400 DIR And {A400 c/s} aerodrome twelve o clock one five miles report visual 11:25:07 DIR A400 Wilco {A400 c/s} 11:25:16 A400 DIR {A400 c/s} clear of all traffic aerodrome twelve o clock one zero miles report 11:26:06 visual DIR A400 Copied that and that er traffic with no height information was a glider pretty 11:26:14 close A400 DIR roger 11:26:20 Glider ZONE {Glider c/s} brize zone pass your message 11:29:42 ZONE Glider Roger squawking ident erm {Glider c/s} presently two thousand four hundred feet 11:29:45 one zero two zero er filing an airprox A four hundred M time one two six zulu Glider ZONE {Glider c/s} roger 11:30:07 Just for your information I don t know whether you were controlling him in the 11:30:09 ZONE Glider zone but er I mean it wasn t that close but we certainly heard him and he s probably gonna file as well I think he took avoiding action on us. {Glider c/s} er roger affirm I was controlling him in I did call him to you er and 11:30:18 Glider ZONE then when he when she passed she then reported that it was relatively close she didn t say anything about filing however we ll see ZONE Glider ok no problem er we ll phone you probably later this afternoon 11:30:29 Glider ZONE roger 11:30:33 ZONE Glider {Glider c/s} going en-route 11:30:42 Glider ZONE {Glider c/s} roger 11:30:44 Analysis and Investigation Military ATM At 1124:50 (Figure 1), the Brize Norton controller calls Traffic Information to the A400, the first of which can be identified as the 7000 squawk to the north east indicating 012 on Mode C. The second piece of Traffic Information is on a slow moving primary contact; this is not visible on the radar replay. 2

Figure 1: Geometry at 1124:50 (A400 squawking 3743; Glider not visible). At 1126:19 (Figure 2), the radar replay shows the A400 make an adjustment to the left, this correlates with the tape transcript and the pilot s report. No primary contact is visible in the location at this time. Figure 2: Geometry at 1126:19 (A400 squawking 3743; Glider not visible). The glider pilot called on the Brize Norton Zone frequency to report the Airprox and stated his altitude as 2400ft. The controller asks the glider to squawk ident; no SSR return is visible on radar replay, the position of the glider cannot be confirmed. The radar replay shows no primary contact in the immediate vicinity of the A400 at the time of the incident. The tape transcript indicates the controller called an intermittent contact at 11:24:50 and at 11:26:06 called the aerodrome to the A400 stating (A400 callsign) clear of all traffic aerodrome twelve o clock one zero miles report visual. Before calling the aerodrome the controller would have scanned the route inbound; this would indicate that at this time no primary contact was visible on the controller s radar. Given the high density of traffic in the vicinity of the Brize Norton CTR it may have been prudent to have reduced the level of service; however the A400 pilot s report indicates that he was aware of the busy airspace at the time. 3

The primary barrier for the A400 in this instance was see and avoid. Traffic Information was passed at 5nm on a primary contact, which may have contributed to the pilot s situational awareness; however, it is unlikely they would have acquired a glider visually at that range. After passing Traffic Information it is doubtful that the glider displayed on the controller s radar screen again, and so precluded any further update to the A400 pilot. If the glider had been transponding Mode3/A TCAS may have been effective, alternatively if the glider pilot had called Brize Norton ATC on frequency to inform them of his operating location, ATC could have passed the A400 pilot further information to aid situational awareness on gliding activity. UKAB Secretariat The Glider and A400 pilots shared an equal responsibility for collision avoidance and not to operate in such proximity to other aircraft as to create a collision hazard 1. The A400 was required to give way to the glider, which he did. Comments HQ Air Command The A400 was just completing its delivery flight from Seville to Brize Norton and arrived in the area on what was a busy flying day. The A400 would have been relying on TCAS, Traffic Information and good lookout to avoid other users of the air. It is a shame that the first 2 barriers appear to have been inhibited due to the glider being equipped with (quite a rare occurrence) but not using its transponder, or speaking with ATC. Whilst ATC were doing their best to provide a good service, they can only report on what they see and primary returns of gliders are notoriously weak/intermittent. In the end see and avoid remained the final barrier and was used successfully. BGA Good lookout was an effective barrier in this case, and it s good to see proactive reporting by the glider pilot. On such a busy gliding day, FLARM Radar would likely have helped the Brize Approach Controller with situational awareness of glider traffic. We continue to encourage glider pilots to turn on transponders when they are fitted. Summary An Airprox was reported when a glider and a A400 flew into proximity at 1125 on Saturday 23 rd July 2016. The glider pilot was operating under VFR in VMC, the A400 pilot, IFR in VMC. The glider pilot was not in receipt of an ATS and the A400 pilot was in receipt of a Traffic Service from Brize. PART B: SUMMARY OF THE BOARD'S DISCUSSIONS Information available consisted of reports from the pilots of both aircraft, transcripts of the relevant RT frequencies, radar photographs/video recordings, reports from the air traffic controllers involved and reports from the appropriate ATC and operating authorities. The Board first looked at the actions of the glider pilot. They noted that although the glider was fitted with a transponder, it wasn t switched on at the time of the Airprox. The glider member informed the Board that this was probably because of concerns about battery life, and that few gliders have powerful enough batteries to keep the transponder functioning for long flights. Whilst accepting this as a problem, members thought that operating close to Brize Norton with its large aircraft operating in the vicinity would surely be one of the times when switching on the transponder would be paramount. Not only would it have allowed ATC to see the glider and so pass Traffic Information to other aircraft, 1 SERA.3205 Proximity. 4

it would also have triggered the TCAS in the A400 to alert its pilot about the presence of the glider. Members also noted that the glider pilot did not call Brize ATC until after the incident, although they were aware that some glider pilots may not have an RT licence, they thought that for those that do, an information call to ATC to alert them of their routing would also provide vital Traffic Information, and in this case might have prevented the incident. Nevertheless, the Board noted that the glider pilot was entitled to fly where he was and, in Class G airspace, see-and-avoid was the main mitigation against mid-collision. Turning to the A400 pilot, although he was operating under IFR, he was VMC and receiving a Traffic Service from Brize ATC. However, he did not receive any specific Traffic Information either from ATC or his TCAS due to the fact that the glider was not displaying on the ATC radar screen or electronically cooperating with the aircraft CWS due to lack of SSR. In the end, the successful barrier for the A400 pilot was look-out, although some members commented that, in a busy Class G ATC environment, the A400 pilot might have been better served by ensuring, as he did later, that he was well clear of cloud and able to see and be seen rather than skirting a broken cloud-base at 2800ft as he had reported. That being said, the Board thought that the A400 pilot had probably seen the glider as early as the prevailing circumstances permitted and, although the separation was probably not as great as he would have wished for, they thought that there was very little more that he could have done to subsequently increase the separation. Finally, the Board looked at the actions of the air traffic controller. Without a transponder it is unlikely that a glider would give a solid radar indication due to its small radar cross-section, and so the controller had no way of knowing that it was operating in the area. That said, he had given Traffic Information on other slow-moving and intermittent contacts in the vicinity so, had he received information on the glider s position either from SSR or an RT call, there was no reason to think that the controller would not have given Traffic Information. Noting the BGA comments about FLARM at Brize Norton, the RAF ATC member told the Board that, whilst it is correct that Brize does not have a FLARM receiver in ATC, even if they did controllers cannot use it to control with, and it would be on a separate computer screen, not the radar display. Therefore, any Traffic Information would have been generic, not specific to the A400 and this glider. That being said, the Board recalled previous recommendations to the military to install FLARM receivers within ATC as a means of improving general situational awareness of the locations that were busy with gliding traffic. In determining the cause, the Board quickly agreed that because both pilots were entitled to operate the airspace and had probably seen each other as early as prevailing circumstances permitted, the incident was best described as a conflict in Class G, resolved by the A400 pilot. That being said, they also agreed that the glider pilot not selecting his transponder on in this busy airspace was contributory to the Airprox. The Board noted that the A400 pilot had reported the need to conduct a hard-left emergency break to achieve 500m separation, but that the glider pilot reported seeing the A400 in only a gentle turn. The Board concluded that the glider pilot had probably only seen the A400 (in his rear sector) after it had completed the avoiding-action turn and was reversing back onto track. As a result, the risk was assessed as Category B, safety margins had been much reduced below the norm. PART C: ASSESSMENT OF CAUSE AND RISK Cause: Contributory Factor: A conflict in Class G resolved by the A400M pilot. The Arcus pilot did not have his SSR transponder selected on. Degree of Risk: B. 5