Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Similar documents
Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

CPA2 1256: ft V/2.8nm H

Date: 29 Apr 2017 Time: 1119Z Position: 5226N 00112W Location: 10nm ENE Coventry

FINAL REPORT BOEING B777, REGISTRATION 9V-SWH LOSS OF SEPARATION EVENT 3 JULY 2014

Date: 01 Jun 2018 Time: 0959Z Position: 5121N 00048W Location: 6nm N Farnborough

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A03O0213 LOSS OF SEPARATION

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

ENR 1.14 AIR TRAFFIC INCIDENTS

Date: 01 Aug 2016 Time: 1344Z Position: 5441N 00241W

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

TCAS Pilot training issues

Date: 29 Jun 2018 Time: 1502Z Position: 5325N 00312W Location: 5nm NW Liverpool Airport

Date: 14 Jun 2017 Time: 1600Z Position: 5121N 00102W Location: 7nm NW Blackbushe airport

CPA 0833: ft V 0.4nm H F186 F189 F173 33:16 F175

Date: 23 Jul 2016 Time: 1125Z Position: 5137N 00146W Location: IVO Swindon

GENERAL INFORMATION Aircraft #1 Aircraft #2

Letter of Agreement. between. and

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 27 Aug Z. (5nm NE Coventry Airport) Airspace: London FIR (Class: G)

Pilot RVSM Training Guidance Material

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 9 Sep Z. (6nm N Linton on Ouse) Airspace: Vale of York AIAA (Class: G)

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

Interim Statement Ref. AAIU

CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK

SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR IN-FLIGHT CONTINGENCIES IN OCEANIC AIRSPACE OF SEYCHELLES FIR

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 17 Jul Z. (5nm NE Silverstone) Airspace: Lon FIR (Class: G)

FINAL REPORT. Ref. No 547/05/ZZ. Investigation separation minima infringement CSA 689 and DLH 2JC on 1 st of November Prague December 2005

SAFETY BULLETIN. One Level of Safety Worldwide Safety Bulletin No. 05SAB004 5 July 2004

Final Report No by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

Final Report No 1886 by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

CAR Section II Series I Part VIII is proposed to be amended. The proposed amendments are shown in subsequent affect paragraphs.

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

SECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

Safety Brief. 21st March Operations in Somali Airspace

AIRPROX REPORT No

PHRASEOLOGY COMMON MISTAKES

SPORT AVIATION CORP LTD

ARMS Exercises. Capt. Gustavo Barba Member of the Board of Directors

Final Report No by the Federal Aircraft Accident Board

C560X. Tutor(A) Tutor(B) AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 1 Apr Z 5144N 00115W (15nm N CPT) Airspace: Oxford AIAA (Class: G)

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 7 Dec Z (Saturday)

LFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG

Risk of collision between two airliners southwest of Vihti VOR, Finland on 9 October 1998

Radar derived Levels show Mode C 1013hPa M185 FL : : :10 F406

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

21 November 2016, 18:06 UTC Coordinates --- Altitude Approximately 1700 ft above mean sea level Air traffic service

SECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS

ALTIMETER SETTING PROCEDURES

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

Human and Organizational Factors in SAIB Safety Investigations

CHAPTER 4 AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES

Date: 19 Jun 2016 Time: 1211Z Position: 5228N 00216W Location: IVO Wolverhampton

SAFETYSENSE LEAFLET AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES OUTSIDE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE

EMB :40 A43 A38 A35 A34 43:28 A29

Chapter 6. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1

REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE P.O.BOX 181, VICTORIA SEYCHELLES

Date: 12 Apr 2017 Time: 1732Z Position: 5123N 00028W Location: Heli-route 3

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A00Q0116 RISK OF COLLISION

SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 11

AIRPROX incident between a Cessna 650, LN-NLD, and Airbus A320, HS- IPZ, approximately 20 NM north of Oslo.

Date: 09 Apr 2017 Time: 1305Z Position: 5357N 00245W Location: 2nm east of Cockerham

Final Report No by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Date: 25 Apr 2016 Time: 1714Z Position: 5107N 00024W Location: 10nm W Gatwick airport

Time: 1111Z Position: 5049N 00016W Location: 1nm SE Brighton City Airport

RV6 800ft aal 24:27 24:39 25:03 24:51

Operating Safely. A Fundamental Guide to FAA RADAR Operations. Federal Aviation Administration Near Airports

1960 New York Air Disaster. On December 16, 1960, in rain and sleet, two civilian airliners collided 5000 feet above Miller

Date: 9 Dec 2015 Time: 1503Z Position: 5417N 00039W Location: Vale of York AIAA

Collision Avoidance UPL Safety Seminar 2012

AIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 11 Mar Z

For a 1309 System Approach of the Conflict Management

Agenda. What is a Large Height Deviation (LHD)? Why is it important to report LHDs? Understanding LHDs. LHD Reporting Category E LHDs

Investigation Report

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

TCAS RA not followed. Tzvetomir BLAJEV Stan DROZDOWSKI

London City Airport. 43 years

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

AIRPROX REPORT No PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB

Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Radar derived Levels show

IVAO Switzerland Division

Final Report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Breakdown of separation 22 km south-west of Sydney Airport, NSW 4 April 2007

Consider problems and make specific recommendations concerning the provision of ATS/AIS/SAR in the Asia Pacific Region LOST COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

AVIATION OCCURRENCE REPORT A98W0216 LOSS OF SEPARATION

AIP ENR JORDAN 12 DEC 2013 RADAR SERVICES AND PROCEDURES

1.2 An Approach Control Unit Shall Provide the following services: c) Alerting Service and assistance to organizations involved in SAR Actions;

ATM REGIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR.. CTA/UTA/FIR

Reconstruction of flightpath of B and TU154M according to radardata

Transcription:

Federal Department of the Environment, transport, Energy and Communications N A009 Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau concerning the incident (Airprox) between CRX518, HB-IZY and BZH831, F-GRJB on 23 rd September 1999 FIR Zurich, 18 NM North-East ROTIS Bundeshaus Nord, CH-3003 Berne

1 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BUREAU FINAL REPORT AIR TRAFFIC INCIDENT REPORT (ATIR) AIRPROX (NEAR COLLISION) THIS REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCIDENT/INCIDENT PREVENTION. THE LEGAL ASSESSMENT OF ACCIDENT/INCIDENT CAUSES AND CIRCUMSTANCES IS NO CONCERN OF THE INCIDENT INVESTIGATION (ART. 24 OF THE AIR NAVIGATION LAW) PLACE/DATE/TIME AIRCRAFT FIR Zurich / 18 NM north-east ROTIS 23 September 1999 16:37 UTC 1. CRX518 SAAB2000 HB-IZY, Crossair, Geneva - Dusseldorf 2. BZH831 CL 600 FGRJB, Britair (France), Munich - Lyon ATS CENTRE ACC Zurich (Area Control Centre) AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS RE-Upper 1 (Radar-Executive air traffic control) RP-Upper 1 (Planning radar air traffic control) AIRSPACE C

2 HISTORY CRX518 was flying from Geneva to Dusseldorf. On first contact with Zurich radar, frequency 133.050 MHz, the pilot reported FL210 climbing to FL240 (requested cruising altitude was FL310). CRX518 was then authorised by RE-Upper1 (Radar- Executive) on route FRI TRA TGO to FL270. BZH831 was flying from Munich to Lyons at an altitude of FL280. The flight route was KPT TRA BENEM. Shortly before TRA, BZH831 was authorised by RE-Upper1 to proceed direct to BENEM. When CRX518 reached FL270 and requested a higher FL, he was instructed by air traffic control to maintain FL270 (expect FL280 in about 15 NM as final level), since he clearly wished this flight to cross with BZH831 first. Two minutes later the first crossing occurred, with CRX518 crossing with KAC171A. At this time air traffic control issued CRX518 the instruction to climb to FL280. CRX518 and BZH831 were approximately 10 NM apart on a opposite course. Immediately thereafter, the RE recognised his error and requested CRX518 (which was now at FL276) to descend back to FL270. At the same time, he instructed BZH831 to make a 15 degree turn to the right. However, on the basis of a TCAS (Traffic Collision Alert System) alarm, BZH831 was already on the point of climbing. Despite the measures taken, both by the air traffic controller and the pilot, a dangerous encounter occurred (3 NM horizontal and 700 ft vertical separation). FINDINGS - CRX518 and BZH831 were in radio contact with Zurich radar (Upper 1). - Both aircraft were in transit through Zurich region. - BZH831 was instructed to remain at FL280. - In the TRA (Trasadingen) region, there were a few CB (cumulo-nimbus) clouds. - The STCA (Short Term Collision Alert) at air traffic control signalled very late. - BZH831 was following a TCAS-RA (Resolution Advisory). ANALYSIS At the time of the incident, traffic was moderate to heavy. Because of the CB in the TRA region, various pilots asked to fly around these hazard areas making minor course corrections. According to air traffic control planning, CRX518 and BZH831 were to cross approx. 18 NM north-east of ROTIS. This caused RE-Upper1 to authorise CRX518 to climb to FL270 for the time being, since another aircraft, namely KAC171A, was on a reciprocal course to CRX518 at FL290 (approximately 10 NM in front of BZH831), in order to descend subsequently to Geneva. RE-Upper1 recognised his mistake straight away and was simultaneously made aware of the danger by his PLANNING air traffic controller. This caused the RE to

3 instruct CRX518 (in the meantime climbing between FL271 and 275) to descend again to FL270 immediately. At the same time the pilot of BZH831 received a TCAS alert to climb immediately. He did this up to FL288. Finally RE-Upper1 allocated BZH831 an avoiding heading. At the same time as the above-mentioned actions, the air traffic controller at his workstation received an STCA (Short Term Conflict Alert), making him aware of the developing danger. In this case, however, the alarm occurred at the precise time when both the air traffic controller and the pilots of the aircraft concerned had already initiated measures to defuse the conflict situation. The reactions and instructions of the controller, after he had become aware of his mistake, were rapid. However, the quickest possible resolution of the conflict suffered a short delay, as a result of the shock experienced by the controller in view of the situation, owing to an initial imprecise instruction to CRX518 (controller: sorry, maintain FL280 (instead of FL270), opposite traffic!). On the second attempt, FL270 was then stated clearly. The entire conflict situation was fortunately able to be resolved by fast reactions and the exemplary co-operation of all concerned. CAUSE The incident arose as a result of a brief lack of attention on the part of the Radar controller, resulting in the fact that BZH831 was for a short time no longer part of his control concept. Bern, 6 June 2001 Swiss Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau

Attachement No.2 swisscontrol Page No. 1 Flugsicherungsbetrieb Zürich CH-8058 Zürich-Flughafen Zürich-Flughafen, 27.9.1999 ZZD Transcript of Original Tape Recording No. of pages 3 Subject ATIR BZH831 of September 23, 1999 Abbreviations 831 BZH831 Britair (France) and Call Signs 518 CRX518 Fehler! Textmarke nicht definiert. Crossair ACC Zurich ACC Upper 1 Sector Frequencies Zurich ACC West Upper 1 Radar 133.050 MHz The signer certifies the completeness and correctness of the present transcript. swisscontrol Flugsicherungsbetrieb Zürich Nicky Scherrer

Page No. 2 From To Time UTC Communications Observations 831 ACC 16:25:28 Zürich, good afternoon, BZH831, passing flight level 275 for 280 ACC 831 :32 BZH831, good evening, sqawk 2747 831 ACC :35 2747, BZH831 4 stations in between ACC 831 :26:35 BZH831, identified, maintain 280, inbound Trasadingen, call you back for left turn 831 ACC :43 Okay, inbound Trasadingen and 280 for the flight level, BZH831 1 station in between 518 ACC :28:29 Zürich "Guten Tag", CRX518, flight level 210 climbing to flight level 240 ACC 518 :35 CRX518, "Guete Abig", identified, cleared Trasadingen Tango, climb to level 270 518 ACC :40 Trasadingen Tango, 270, CRX518 8 stations in between ACC 518 :31:48 BZH831, left to BENEM 1 station in between 831 ACC :32:08 That was for BZH831, direct BENEM? ACC 831 :11 correct 831 ACC :12 Okay, will do that 8 stations in between

Page No. 3 From To Time UTC Communications Observations 518 ACC 16:34:12 Zurich, CRX518, any chance for higher, to stay out of clouds? ACC 518 :16 Ja, expect 280 in about fifteen miles as final level, stand-bye, maintain 270 518 ACC :22 Thank you 3 stations in between ACC 518 :36:47 CRX518, climb to level 280 518 ACC :51 Recleared flight level 280, CRX518 2 aircraft in between ACC 518 :37:07 CRX518, sorry, maintain 280*, opposite traffic *says 280 518 ACC :14 CRX518, confirm, we will maintain flight level 280? ACC 518 :18 Negative, 270, sorry 518 ACC :24...*518, present altitude 276 descending flight level 270, CRX518 *two stations blocking ACC 518 :27 Thank you ACC 831 :28 BZH831, right by one five degrees 831 ACC :30 We are climbing right now, we have a TCAS resolution ACC 831 :35 Yes, opposite traffic three miles at 275 descending again 831 ACC :40 He was at 279 for us ACC 831 :43 Okay 518 ACC :46 CRX518, traffic crossed ACC 518 :48 Thank you 831 ACC :51 We are descending to 280, BZH831 ACC 831 :54 Thank you, BZH831 1 station in between ACC 518 :38:13 CRX518, recleared again flight level 280

Page No. 4 From To Time UTC Communications Observations 518 ACC 16:38:18 Recleared flight level 280, CRX518 ACC 831 :25 BZH831, descend now to flight level 270 831 ACC :30 Down 270, BZH831 831 ACC :42 And BZH831, we will file a report for that TCAS resolution and AIRPROX ACC 831 :50 Okay, and say again the rest? 831 ACC :54 For an AIRPROX, - AIRPROXIMITY ACC 831 :57 Okay 831 ACC :59 We had about four hundred feet separation ACC 831 :39:02 Okay - end -