Serbia, a crossroad in Europe planning for sustainable waste management Doc. Dr Goran Vujic 1
content 1. Introduction 2. Current waste management in Serbia 3. Main EU demands 4. Landfill MBT WTE plants solution? 2
1. introduction 3
1. introduction 4
2. Current waste management in Serbia 3209 landfills site, 178 (big) (10%/60%/30%) 195.402 citizens are cover by collecting company in Vojvodine + 168.167 no data 17,9% from 2.031.992 Novi Sad 631 employed cover 400.000 citizen 11,6 miliona EUR tournouver Less than 3 euro per house about 30 euro per house per year 5
2. Current waste management in Serbia Municipality (Number of inhabitant) Generated waste(t/week) *result of project Generated waste (kg/inhabitant/daily) Generated waste (kg/inhabitant/year) Inđija 49.258 363 t 1.05 kg 383 kg Sombor 56.734 269 t 0.67 kg 246 kg Novi Kneževac 9.648 40 t 0.59 kg 214 kg Šabac 123.155 463 t 0.59 kg 209 kg Topola 25.292 51 t 0.29 kg 105 kg Kragujevac 185.000 897 t 0.70 kg 252 kg Bor 55.817 125 t 0.32 kg 116 kg Niš 239.596 1230 t 0.73 kg 266 kg Novi Sad 314.192 2560 t 1.16 kg 424 kg Beograd 1.392.691 10382 t 1.08 kg 394 kg 6
2. Current waste management in Serbia Republic of Serbia Summer analysis 2.226.427 t/year Winter analysis 1.857.598 t/year Spring analysis 2.086.212 t/year Average Generated waste (kg/inhabitant/day) 2.056.746 t/year 0.76 kg Generated waste (kg/inhabitant/day) 7
2. Current waste management in Serbia 8
3. Main EU demands 9
3. Main EU demands 10
4. Solution 4. solution? 11
4. Solution 12 regional landfill with separation facility or MBT Improve system for medical waste collection and sterilization (autoclave) Make system for special streams, Animal, waste oils Between 2015 and 2019 Build more 12 regional landfill Increase recycling to 25% Cover 100 % --- 12
4. Solution Smederevo 2,7% / 83,8% Zrenjanin 2,8% / 81,1% Kragujevac 3,6% / 78,3% Subotica 3,7% / 74,7% Zaječar 1,3% / 89,8% 8% Kruševac 2,3% / 88,5% Ostalo 10,2% / 100% Kraljevo 2,4% / 86,2% Kikinda 2,0 % Lapovo 1,6% 10,4% Leskovac 2,4% Vranje 2,1% Pančevo 2,3% 11,5% / Užice 3,9 % 21,9% Pirot-0,9 % S. Mitrovica 3,6 % Inđija 3,1% Zrenjanin 2,6% / 74,2% Zaječar 3,6% / 85,3% Kruševac 3,5 % / 81,7% Kraljevo 4,0% / 78,2% Smederevo 3,4% / 88,7% Ostalo 11,3% / 100% Kikinda 2,7 % Lapovo 2,4% Leskovac 3,1% 13,2% Vranje 3,1% Pančevo 1,9% 14,5% / Užice 5,1 % 27,7% Pirot-1,3 % S. Mitrovica 5,3 % Inđija 2,8 % Valjevo 3,7% / 71,0% Niš 3,8% / 67,3% Beograd 33,5% / 55,4% Kragujevac 4,3% / 71,6% Subotica 3,6% / 67,3% Valjevo Niš 5,1% / 63,7% 4,9 % / 58,6% Beograd 19,1 % / 46,8% Novi Sad 8,1% / 63,5% Novi Sad 6,9% / 53,7 % Region % kg of waste Region % citizens 13
4. Solution 14
4. Solution 1990 InternationalGeary-Khamis dollars 25.000 Number of landfill sites 1000 900 20.000 15.000 10.000 5.000 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 Austria Germany Netherlands Bulgaria Romania Yugoslavia Serbia/Montenegro Argentina World Average landfill site Germany landfill site Nederland 100 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 0 year 15
4. Solution 125 120 115 110 BBP Consumentenafval 105 100 95 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 16
4. Solution 1990 InternationalGeary-Khamis dollars 25.000 1000 Number of landfill sites 20.000 15.000 10.000 5.000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Austria Germany Netherlands Bulgaria Romania Yugoslavia Serbia/Monteneg ro Argentina World Average landfill site Germany 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 0 year 17
4. Solution 1990 InternationalGeary-Khamis dollars 25.000 500 Number of landfill sites/price per hh per year 450 20.000 15.000 10.000 5.000 0 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 year Germany Netherlands Serbia/Montenegro landfill site Germany landfill site Nederland local waste taxes in euro/hh/year Nederland local waste taxes in euro/hh/year Novi Sad/Serbia 18
4. Waste to Energy as one solution Landfilling 20 Composting 20 Digestate 30 Processing costs (per 1000 kg, taxes not included) Erik de Baedts NVRD, ISWA Incineration 60-130 down to. Recycling 80 market value secondary product 19
Conclusion Some special streams good Landfill network?!! Strong EU support for developing country not only money regulation and clear and open policy Belgrade! 20