WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes

Similar documents
Expanding Settlement Growing Mechanization

Connie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park

Wilderness Stewardship Plan Scoping Newsletter Winter 2013

WILDERNESS PLANNING. Wilderness. Interagency Regional Wilderness Stewardship Training. Alamosa, Colorado - March 26-29, 2007

Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center s Wilderness Investigations High School

French Fire Recovery and Restoration Project Wilderness Resource Impact Analysis

Wilderness Character and Wilderness Characteristics. What s the difference? Why does it matter?

Alternative 3 Prohibit Road Construction, Reconstruction, and Timber Harvest Except for Stewardship Purposes B Within Inventoried Roadless Areas

Overview. Wilderness Act of Statement of Need. What is Wilderness Character. Monitoring Wilderness Character

Theme: Predominately natural/natural appearing; rustic improvements to protect resources. Size*: 2,500 + acres Infrastructure**:

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE WORKSHEETS

Camping Freshwater Fishing Big Game Hunting VIII. Summary Decision

/s/ Robert V. Abbey Director

Wilderness. Air Tour Noise Assessment Framework George Wright Society April 2, 2015

Wilderness Research. in Alaska s National Parks. Scientists: Heading to the Alaska Wilderness? Introduction

Draft Revised Land Management Plan and DEIS Comments

3.12 Roadless Areas and Unroaded Areas

Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v

Appendix A BC Provincial Parks System Goals

5.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT

Coconino National Forest Potential Wilderness Proposal

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE Instructions

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE WORKSHEETS

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

National Park Service Wilderness Action Plan

Special Recreation Management Areas Extensive Recreation Management Areas Public Lands Not Designated as Recreation Management Areas

National Wilderness Steering Committee

Appendix I. Wilderness Review

Discussion Topics. But what does counting tell us? Current Trends in Natural Resource Management

E V A L U A T I O N O F A R E AS W I T H W I L D E RN ESS PO T E N T I A L

Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018

APPENDIX W. Wilderness Characteristics Assessment

LESSON 5 Wilderness Management Case Studies

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

April 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,

Strategies & Tactics for Managing Social Impacts in Wilderness

The Roots of Carrying Capacity

Strategies & Tactics for Managing Social Impacts in Wilderness

Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

Fossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011

The Wilderness Act of Cecilia Reed, Forest Service Mokelumne Wilderness Manager

Wilderness Stewardship Plan Handbook

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT WILDERNESS CHARACTER MONITORING

Minimum Requirements References in National Park Service Policy

Biosphere Reserves of India : Complete Study Notes

Table 3-7: Recreation opportunity spectrum class range by prescription. Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) Classes

S Central Coast Heritage Protection Act APRIL 21, 2016

4/1/2009. Wilderness Character

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa

PAD-US 1.1 (CBI Edition) Management Designations. National Parks (NPS) and National Park

Douglas Smith, District Ranger ATTN: Hi Lo Project Kawishiwi Ranger Station 1393 Hwy 169 Ely, MN 55731

Wilderness Management Principles

Ontario s Approach to Wilderness: A Policy May 1997 (Version 1.0)

Federal Outdoor Recreation Trends Effects on Economic Opportunities

DIRECTOR S ORDER #41: Wilderness Preservation and Management

Whitefish Range Partnership Tentatively Approved by WRP 11/18/2013!Rec. Wilderness Page 1

Briefing Paper: USFS Wilderness and Other Federal Designations

Appendix I Case-Studies in Wilderness Management

We, Ministers, assembled in Berlin for the International Conference on Biodiversity and Tourism from 6 to 8 March 1997

WASHINGTON STATE PARKS LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Order of the Minister of Environment #39, August 22, 2011 Tbilisi

Salt River Allotments Vegetative Management EIS Draft Recreation Affected Environment Report Don R. Sullivan November 6, 2012

Superintendent David Uberuaga June 27, 2011 Grand Canyon National Park P.O. Box 129 Grand Canyon, AZ 86023

Proposed Backcountry Area Definition and Guidelines

Chetco River Kayaking Permit

Why is Wilderness Important? Does the American Public Really Care? Should it be managed? Why? Who should Manage it? How should it be Managed?

LESSON 9 Recognizing Recreational Benefits of Wilderness

Existing Resource Information

ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS IN COLORADO, Proposed Rule Regulatory Impact Analysis And Cost-Benefit Analysis

TOPIC 5 ROADLESS/WILDERNESS ROADLESS AREAS. Introduction. Laws, Policy, and Direction

Applying Carrying Capacity Concepts in Wilderness

MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIMEVAL IN NATIONAL PARKS By Arno B. Cammerer Director, National Park Service

Keeping Wilderness Wild: Increasing Effectiveness With Limited Resources

Lolo National Forest Plan Amendment #38

White Mountain National Forest

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

Recreation and Travel Management Report

Determination of Need for Commercial Services within the Karta River Wilderness Area. Thorne Bay Ranger District Tongass National Forest

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE WORKBOOK

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF RECREATION AND PARKS RECREATIONAL CARRYING CAPACITY GUIDELINES

Map 1.1 Wenatchee Watershed Land Ownership

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

CAMPER CHARACTERISTICS DIFFER AT PUBLIC AND COMMERCIAL CAMPGROUNDS IN NEW ENGLAND

PRESERVING WILDERNESS CHARACTER

Dumont Dunes Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA)

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

Chapter 9: National Parks and Protected Areas

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Michipicoten Island Regional Plan

White Mountain National Forest. Appendix E Wilderness Management Plan

PROUDLY BRINGING YOU CANADA AT ITS BEST. Management Planning Program NEWSLETTER #1 OCTOBER, 2000


HOTFIRE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT MODEL A CASE STUDY

Percentage Participation

ARCTIC PACIFIC LAKES PROVINCIAL PARK

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008

Thank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

Transcription:

WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes Date: 3/7/2017 Roadless Area: Ruby South Description of Project Activity or Impact to Roadless Area: (Note describe the activity that is affecting the roadless area, i.e. miles of road construction, timber acres harvested, acres treated by fire, etc ) Harmon WUI Fuels Reduction is the first of several projects to undergo NEPA as part of the Harrison Pass Watershed Restoration Action Plan (WRAP). Fuels treatment within the watershed is found in Essential Project 5. As staffing and funding allows additional fuels reduction units will be assessed and treated. This project is being proposed to reduce the standing fuel load within the treatment unit, to reduce the fire hazard to the neighboring community to the forest and to improve the sagebrush ecosystem that the wildlife species depend on. Effect to Wilderness Quality or Attributes Wilderness Quality or Attribute (Note: delete attribute descriptions after data is entered to save space if desired.) Is there an effect? Yes or No Which direction is the effect? Improving, Stable or Degrading? Describe the actual effect. Use descriptive terms that discuss the effect, not the activity. May use GIS layers (ROS, SMS, Roads, etc ) to quantify effects. Untrammeled This quality monitors modern human activities that directly control or manipulate the components or processes of ecological systems inside wilderness. In summary, wilderness is essentially unhindered and free from modern human control or manipulation. A measure of the actions taken to hinder, manipulate, or control the long-term natural ecological processes of the area. Address this attribute by describing the management actions included in ct your project activities that would alter the natural processes in the area. Natural This quality monitors both intended and unintended effects of modern people on ecological systems inside wilderness since the time the area was designated. In summary, wilderness ecological systems are substantially free from the effects of modern civilization. A measure of past and proposed activities on the natural No Stable The project area is 2.6% of the roadless area and does not essentially change the Untrammeled character of this roadless area. No Stable The project area is 2.6% of the roadless area and does not substantially change the Natural character of this roadless area.

conditions of the area. It describes the extent to which human influences alter natural processes and conditions away from what one would otherwise expect. This is a measure of the degree of environmental modification that will occur because of your project. Address this attribute by describing the extent of modification that will occur in the wilderness area Consider existing scenic integrity and ROS layers. Undeveloped This quality monitors the presence of structures, construction, habitations, and other evidence of modern human presence or occupation. In summary, wilderness is essentially without permanent improvements or modern human occupation. A measure of the present day physical indicators such as the presence and development level of trails, campsites, structures and facilities as well as the use of motorized equipment, mechanical transport, landing of aircraft, etc. used for administrative purposes. It is an indicator of what the visitor will experience in a setting that is removed from the sights and sounds of civilization and mechanization located inside the wilderness. Address this attribute by describing the extent of modification (i.e. structures required, motorized equipment use, etc.) that will occur during the projects duration or resulting after the project is finished. Consider using ROS maps layers. Outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation This quality monitors conditions that affect the opportunity for people to experience solitude or primitive, unconfined recreation in a wilderness setting, rather than monitoring visitor experiences per se. In summary, wilderness provides outstanding opportunities for people to experience solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation, including the values of Solitude - Described as opportunities to experience solitude, or the isolation from the sights and sounds of management activities inside wilderness, the presence of others. Solitude is measured by considering the presence of screening, distance from impacts to the rest of the area, mitigation measures such as the timing of disturbances. Address solitude by discussing how the project activities affect the ability of a visitor to escape project impacts on solitude within the area. Consider linking to ROS mapping for size and remoteness criteria for Primitive and SPMN. Opportunities for Primitive Recreation -A measure of the experiences available without the developments and to feel a part of nature, with a high degree of challenge and

inspiration and physical and mental challenge reliance on outdoor skills rather than facilities. Address this attribute by describing how the project activities might affect, the number and type of opportunities available, the challenge of the opportunities, and the addition or absence of facilities. Special Features (Ecological, Geologic, Scientific, Educational, Scenic or Historical Values) An attribute that recognizes that wilderness may contain other values of ecological, geologic, scientific, educational, scenic or historical or cultural significance. Unique fish and wildlife species, unique plants or plant communities, potential or existing research natural areas, outstanding landscape features, and significant cultural resource sites should all be considered as types of values that might exist. Identify any of these values that exist within the project area. Address this attribute by describing the effect proposed activities would have on these values. Manageability (as Wilderness) A measure of the ability to manage an area to meet the size criteria (5,000 + acres), the resulting configuration of the potential wilderness, and the interaction of the other elements above. Changes in the shape of the Inventoried Roadless Area may have significant consequences to its wilderness potential. Consider also boundary management impacts such as changing wilderness boundaries to different terrain features or for how access would be provided if project activities cause adjustments in the Inventoried Roadless Area. Address this attribute by discussing how the proposed activities may affect the boundary location, the size, the shape, and the access to the area. Consider ROS mapping. Summary Will the proposed project affect the areas suitability for wilderness designation? No X Yes If Yes, Explain how the project would affect wilderness suitability

WORKSHEET 2 Roadless Area Characteristics Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Roadless Area Characteristics Date: 3/7/2017 Roadless Area: Ruby South Description of Project Activity or Impact to Roadless Area: (Note describe the activity that is affecting the roadless area, i.e. miles of road construction, timber acres harvested, acres treated by fire, etc ) Harmon WUI Fuels Reduction is the first of several projects to undergo NEPA as part of the Harrison Pass Watershed Restoration Action Plan (WRAP). Fuels treatment within the watershed is found in Essential Project 5. As staffing and funding allows additional fuels reduction units will be assessed and treated. This project is being proposed to reduce the standing fuel load within the treatment unit, to reduce the fire hazard to the neighboring community to the forest and to improve the sagebrush ecosystem that the wildlife species depend on. Effect to Roadless Characteristics Roadless Characteristics Soil, water and Air resources Identify any unique or critical watershed resources. Describe how the project will affect these key resources areas and the habitats that depend on them. Sources of public drinking water Identify any public drinking water systems or sources within the project area or that would be affected by the project. Describe how the project would affect water quality and quantity of the public drinking water source. Diversity of plant and animal communities Discuss the diversity of plant and animal communities. Identify any unique plant and animal communities within the area. Describe effects to the diversity of plant and animal communities. Habitat for TES and species dependent on large undisturbed areas of land Identify any TES or sensitive species within the Roadless area. Is there an effect? Yes or No Which direction is the effect? Improving, Stable or Degrading? Describe the actual effect. Use descriptive terms that discuss the effect, not the activity. Explain if the proposal would Alter or Modify the landscape. No Stable There are no TES in this area

Describe how the project would affect the habitats or populations and whether this effect is significant across the normal range and distribution of these habitats and populations. Primitive and semi-primitive classes of recreation Describe current recreation opportunities within the Roadless area. Identify the effects of your project of the area and these activities. Describe the effect in terms of availability for similar experiences in surrounding areas or within the region of use. Consider link to ROS mapping. Reference landscapes for research study or interpretation Describe the landscape that is present. Describe any unique reference landscapes that exist within the Roadless area. Describe how the project activities might affect the reference landscape values of the Roadless area. Consider how the landscapes within the Inventoried Roadless area fits within the broader landscape and if the project creates any overall change. Consider landscape character descriptions in SMS. Landscape character and integrity Describe the current scenic quality and character of the area. Describe project effects to the scenic integrity of the area and changes to the character of the area. Consider existing scenic integrity. Traditional cultural properties and sacred sites Identify generically any significant cultural resources within the Roadless area and describe the effect of the project on these resources. Typically mitigation will be designed to prevent significant effects to these resources. Other locally unique characteristics Identify any locally unique characteristics and describe how the project would affect these values. No Stable Mountainous, sage brush eco-system with pinion/juniper. This will not be effected No Stable No cultural sites will be effected No Stable There are no other unique characteristics