Appendix A Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System Maintenance and Construction Plan (6/13/13) If the decision to implement the project as approved, grant funding would be pursued to fund construction as the Dillon Ranger District s annual trail funding would not be sufficient. The Colorado State Parks OHV Grant Program and the National Forest Foundation s Ski Conservation Fund (NFF SCF) would be the primary funding sources. If the project is approved, an OHV grant application would be submitted in December of 2013. The earliest that this funding could be made available would be summer of 2015. SCORR or Rocky Mountain Youth Corps would be encouraged to apply for an NFF grant for work in 2014 and 2015 (only non-profit organizations are eligible). The OHV grant is expected to be between $200,000 and $300,000. This will be less, depending on other resources used. A project manager and a crew of three people would be hired to work June through October, annually until completed. The crew would work on trail construction, but would also work in conjunction with volunteer projects. A larger crew would be desirable, however, the safe manageable span-of-control is about 5 people per supervisor. The Forest Service has the necessary resources for housing, hiring, workers comp, contracting, purchasing, etc. The grant would include all equipment, tools, and supplies. The following resources may also be used: 1) Forest Service hot shot fire crews are often available, but usually only early season (May-June). Twenty highly trained people have a very high rate of production. 2) Prison Crews can be contracted, but they lack the trail construction expertise. A project leader would be needed to ensure quality. They occasionally camp on site. 3) Rocky Mountain Youth Corps (RMYC) crews have the expertise to build trail, however, a project leader would be needed to ensure quality. They usually camp on site. It is likely that at least one ten-person crew could be contracted to work all season. 4) The Student Conservation Association (SCA) also has youth crews similar to RMYC. 5) A VOC project could result in 100-200 people for one weekend. Their crew leaders are well-trained in trail construction, but would need some direction on motorized trail techniques. 6) SCORR would provide crew leaders and volunteers for ½ day projects. The trail sections that were created from old road beds would most likely be reconstructed with a rubber-track mini-excavator. These sections are: 38-75, 30-33, 35-27, 35-11, and 35-34. A mini-excavator would be used to perform maintenance on Route 66.2A and trail construction on the ATV trail between points 24 and 89. This is a total of 1.49 miles to be reconstructed with equipment. Where a SWECO is needed, this work would be contracted. A Forest Service inspector and/or COR would need to oversee this operation. The rest of the trail segments would be constructed or reconstructed using hand tools. Construction of the new trail segments and the trailhead would be the priority, followed by reconstruction of existing trails. Closure and rehabilitation of unneeded trails would occur concurrently with construction. A target of 5 miles of closure per year has been set. The Rocky Mountain Youth Corps NFF Ski conservation Fund grant application for the 2012 summer season includes 4 weeks of trail closures for the Tenderfoot area. Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 1
The trailhead kiosks could be constructed by Forest Service crews, but it would best for this to be contacted or a volunteer project. The supply and installation of the kiosks by the Forest Service has had many problems and delays. The Forest Service would be able to design, produce, and install the kiosk panels. Construction/Reconstruction Specifications The most recent and advanced techniques would be used. OHV trail construction methods and equipment have evolved significantly in the last few decades. Considerable effort has been made by land management agencies to observe and document trail deterioration and misuse and then develop corrective methods. The following techniques would be used: 1. Contour curvilinear alignment Align the trail so it runs along the natural contour of the terrain. 2. Controlled grade Strive for a design trail grade of 5 percent or less and a maximum sustainable trail grade based on local soil and terrain conditions. Limit the length of the segments with maximum grade to less than 100 feet and their combined length to less than 5 percent of the total trail length. 3. Integrated drainage Integrate water control in the design and construction of the trail using outslope, grade reversals, and grade dips to maintain the terrain s natural drainage patterns. Space drainage structures close enough to prevent water erosion on tread surfaces or at points of discharge. The very best drainage designs are those built into new construction. These include frequent grade reversals and outsloping the entire tread. The classic mark of good drainage is that it s self-maintaining, requiring minimal care. 4. Full bench Construct a full bench by cutting the full width of the tread into the hillside on native, undisturbed material and casting the excavated soil as far from the trail as possible. Full-bench construction requires more excavation and leaves a larger backslope than partialbench construction, but the trailbed will be more durable and require less maintenance. Fullbench construction will be used whenever possible. Examples of an OHV trails with reverse-in-grades built in for drainage. Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 2
In order to provide challenge the following specifications would be used: 5. Tight turns. Avoid long straight sections. 6. Narrow openings in the trees. Leave about 36 7. Leave rocks in the trail tread. 8. Incorporate many turns to keep speeds down. Use existing trees as obstacles to go around, even if a straight section would work. Block openings with debris to deter shortcuts. Plant stump were possible for more natural appearing barriers. The following technical references would be used: Off-Highway Motorcycle and ATV Trails Guidelines for Construction, Maintenance, and User Satisfaction, 1994, Joe Wernex. Trails 2000, 1996, Cam Lockwood Management Guidelines for OHV Recreation, 2006, Tom Crimmons. Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Trails, 1996, USDA, Forest Service. Mechanized Trail Equipment, 1996, USDA, Forest Service. Meyer, Kevin G. 2011. A Comprehensive Framework for Off-Highway Vehicle Trail Management. 1123 2804P. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center Design Features (from the EA): All trails constructed or reconstructed would be designed to be sustainable. Most would follow the contour or have a gentle grade. They would have dips or reverse-in-grade sections to deter water movement and erosion. The tread width would be 18 inches. At all wetland crossings, gravel would be placed on the tread 100 feet prior to the crossing to reduce sedimentation and dust. Approaches to wetland crossings would include turns to ensure slow speeds to reduce dust. All boundaries of wetland areas to be bridged would be re-flagged prior to construction to ensure proper bridge placement. No trails would be placed within 75 feet of potential peatlands Best Management Practices (BMPs) would be used during all phases of construction to reduce impacts from sedimentation and erosion, which may include berms, brush, barriers, check dams, erosion control blankets, filter strips, sandbag barriers, sediment basins, sheet mulching, silt fences, straw-bale barriers, erosion logs, surface roughening, and/or diversion channels. No equipment or construction materials (including fill) would be staged or stored within 100 feet of wetlands or other water features No chemicals, such as soil stabilizers, dust inhibitors or fertilizers would be used within 100 feet of wetlands or other water features Equipment would be refueled in designated contained areas, at least 100 feet away from wetlands or other water features In order to prevent noxious weed transport, all equipment to be used during construction would be thoroughly washed prior to mobilization to the site Where conifer trees seedlings are removed during trail construction and reconstruction, they would be transplanted adjacent to the trail. Minimize Connected Disturbed Areas and sediment delivery to streams by ensuring that roads, road ditches, and other disturbed areas drain to undisturbed soils rather than directly to streams. Manipulate drainage from disturbed areas as necessary using Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 3
natural topography, rolling dips, waterbars, ditch-relief culverts, etc., to disconnect disturbed areas from streams. Source: WCPH Management Measures 1 and 10. Minimize Connected Disturbed Area in the Straight Creek watershed and minimize sediment delivery to Straight Creek by applying a course of 3 angular rock to the trail tread within 100 feet on either side of any tributaries of Straight Creek. Source: WCPH Management Measures 1 and 10; ID Team. Keep heavy equipment out of streams, swales, and lakes, except to cross at designated points, build crossings, or do restoration work, or if protected by at least 1 foot of packed snow or 2 inches of frozen soil. Source: WCPH Management Measure 3. Size culverts to maintain the bankful width, depth, and slope, of the natural stream channel, and to easily pass sediment and debris transported by the stream to be crossed. Do not use culverts less than 18 in diameter to cross any stream channel. Source: WCPH Management Measure 4. Keep ground vehicles out of wetlands. Do not disrupt water supply or drainage patterns into wetlands. Source: WCPH Management Measure 6. Outslope trails where practical to shed water rather than concentrating water on the trail surface. Install cross drains to disperse runoff into filter strips. Design trails to drain water to undisturbed soils rather than retaining water, or draining to streams. Locate and construct trails in such a way as to minimize the amount of excavation needed and to reduce the potential for soil erosion. Source: WCPH Management Measure 9. Do not install culverts during spring runoff, or during periods of heavy precipitation. WCP Management Measure 9. Do not locate trails on slopes that show signs of instability, such as slope failure, mass movement, or slumps. Source: WCPH Management Measure 9. Locate vehicle service and fuel areas on gentle upland sites at least 100 feet away from streams to prevent pollutants from contaminating water. Source: WCPH Management Measure 15. There would be a maximum of 5% gradient at stream crossings with a goal of 0%. Maintenance Resources The goal of the construction and reconstruction of the system would be to create lowmaintenance trails, however, maintenance would still be needed. The goal would be to apply for an OHV grant to hire a season 2-person Forest Service maintenance-patrol crew to work annually on motorized roads and trails throughout the District. Two people are needed because it is not safe to ride motorcycles on trail alone. With the bark beetle infestation, it is likely that clearing logs annually would be necessary. This is not a task that can be done with volunteers because of safety requirements. This crew would be trained and certified to use chainsaws. If this were not possible to have a crew every year, then a 3-year maintenance schedule would be pursued. The log clearing would be added to the District workload as it is anticipated for this to be a District-wide issue and the resources to cut logs on trails should be available. The FS Colorado Statewide OHV crew is available for 1 week maintenance projects. They also are saw certified and can assist with log clearing. There is no cost for this crew other than providing housing. The crew was used on the District in 2011 and 2012. SCORR provided the housing in 2011. SCORR ½ day maintenance projects would continue with 2 projects per summer in the Tenderfoot Mountain area and two projects in the Golden Horseshoe area. Projects would Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 4
include pulling of invasive weeds. SCORR volunteer crew leader training would include invasive weed identification. SCORR responsibilities would be documented in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). This would clarify the expectations, duties, and procedures. If grant funding for maintenance was not available, then maintenance would be added to the District workload. Volunteer projects using FDRD and SCORR members would be implemented. A minimum of 8 one-day projects per year would be needed. The Colorado State state-wide motorized crew could work on the trail system. Several trail closures would be implemented in 2013, but most new trail construction would probably not begin until 2014 and could be completed by the Fall of 2016. There may be some opportunities for some small trail construction projects before 2014, but the emphasis would be on performing maintenance/reconstruction on existing trails and closures. RMYC crews have been used for 2 weeks total in 2011 and 2012 for trail closures in the area. The ATV trail between points 89 and 24 would be completed prior to closing the Tenderfoot Mtn. Road (66.2B). The 2016 OHV grant would include purchase of a mini-excavator that would be used to perform much of the ATV trail construction (with volunteer labor to do the hand work). Prior to that time, there may be an opportunity to rent the equipment for a couple of weeks ($2,500) or purchase one for $25,000, but a funding source has not been identified. Implementation Schedule For the 2014, summer season, some trails targeted for reconstruction may be opened after the following: All non-system trails originating from these trails would be blocked with debris and signed as closed at the trail junction. A brochure with a map would be produced to identify the open routes and emphasize that all other trails are closed. An OHV grant for a 2-person crew to patrol and maintain these and other District OHV trails has already been secured. Education efforts will emphasize that these are the only trails open in the short term. A sign would be posted at the beginning of the Frey Gulch Road: MOTORCYCLE USE PERMITTED ONLY ON SIGNED/NUMBERED ROUTES. ALL OTHER TRAILS CLOSED Travel management signs will be posted on all open routes. The trail segments that have been identified for reconstruction and would be open to motorcycle use includes: 1-89, 89-24, 24-21, 19-21, 52-42, 67-72, 19-71, 51-19, 61-51, 51-60, 60-61, 60-63, 36-59. This would be about 4 miles of trail. There would be loops only and no dead end trails. The following map identified the routes that would be open in 2014. Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 5
1) As soon as the resources are made available to reconstruct section 89-24 and it can be opened to ATV use, then the bottom section of the Tenderfoot Mountain Road (66.2A) would be closed (See rehabilitation plan for more information on the closure of this route). 2) The following table identifies the priorities for construction and reconstruction. Those segments that connect existing trail segments were the highest construction priority, especially those that would adopted as dead end routes. Those segments in the Frey Gulch watershed were given the highest reconstruction priority because improvements to the fish habitat are best completed as soon as possible. Generally, the new construction would be accomplished first, then the reconstruction would begin. Where significant erosion is occurring on existing trails, corrective action would be implemented as soon as possible. Because the work would be completed over several years, there would be an opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of management techniques and make modifications prior to completion of the entire system. Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 6
Miles Existing Trail/Road New Miles in 5.5 MA Bridges or Culverts Needed Re- Construction Priority Miles Construction Segment New Trail Priority 2-10 1.64 10 2-15 0.11 9 4-5 0.75 0.1 1 17 4-20 0.14 0.14 1 22 5-7 0.33 21 5-8 0.19 16 8-9 0.06 18 9-10 0.17 17 9-61 0.14 19 9-85 0.35 15 10-85 0.38 19 11-27 1.2 12 13-67 1.86 1 13 13-85 0.6 14 15-77 0.24 15 19-21 0.44 0.44 28 19-32 0.03 6 20-22 0.44 1 18 30-33 0.32 30 31-30 1 1 32-63 0.16 26 35-11 0.25 3 35-27 0.46 5 35-34 0.11 4 36-37 0.22 36-59 0.51 2 38-75 0.27 29 42-67 1.17 3 51-19 0.28 27 51-60 0.06 23 52-42 0.36 1 60-61 0.28 12 60-63 0.22 24 61-51 0.36 20 63-13 0.55 25 66-83 0.37 7 67-72 0.57 6 73-72 0.62 4 74-75 0.28 11 75-49 0.67 2 76-3 0.24 16 77-3 0.2 8 78-2 0.28 14 78-76 0.11 7 79-84 0.06 10 81-84 0.1 11 82-79 0.07 9 82-81 0.07 8 83-82 0.08 5 84-78 0.18 13 90-91 0.72 21 92-93 0.72 2 20 Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 7
Total 7.87 13.12 0.68 6 Total Trail Miles 20.99 ATV Trail (89-21) 1.4 Roads 5.08 Total Routes 27.47 Roads 32-31 0.48 1-89 1.1 46-48 3.50 Total 5.08 Pre-Construction year 1 (2013) A 4-day Colorado Mountain Club volunteer project will close the route that begins at point 27 and the routes in east end of the 5.5 management area. A total of 2 miles is estimated to be completed. Estimated costs: Coordination of volunteer projects and grant writing ($2100) Construction year 1 (2014) will not include OHV grant funding. It would likely include the following: Through SCORR volunteer project days and the Colorado OHV crew, construction of segments 31-30, 75-49, and 42-67 Through a VOC project, rehabilitation of the routes between points 73 and 21. Through a RMYC project, rehabilitation of the routes north of point 24 and because 30-31 originates on an old road that continues, the route that extends north from point 30 would be rehabilitated. Estimated costs: FS Grant writing, crew supervision, volunteer coordination = $2500; OHV grant Maintenance / Patrol Crew salary, supplies, and vehicle = $80,000 Construction year 2 (2015) will include OHV grant funding. It would likely include the following: Construction of segments 72-73, 83-82, 19-32, 78-76, 77-3, 2-15, 74-75, 11-27, 13-67, 13-85, 9-85, 5-8, 4-5, 20-22, and 89-24 (ATV) 6.6 miles total. Because 78-76 crosses and old ditch (west of point 76) that could be ridden, it will be rehabilitated. Rehabilitation of routes in the 5.5 management area will continue (5 miles). Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 8
Section 89-24 will be reconstructed with a mini-excavator to allow for ATV access. Road 66.2B will be posted as closed to motor vehicles when 89-24 is completed. The trailhead and kiosks will be constructed. All signs will be posted. Funding will be secured tor rehabilitating Road 66.2B Estimated costs: FS Grant writing, crew supervision, volunteer coordination = $2500; OHV grant Maintenance / Patrol Crew salary, supplies, vehicle = $80,000. Construction crew, trailhead construction, mini-excavator purchase, and materials/supplies = $150,000. Construction year 3 (2016) will include OHV grant funding. Construction of segments 4-5, 5-8, 20-22, 10-85, 92-92, and 2-10. 6.12 miles total. Rehabilitation of routes in the 5.5 management area will continue (5 miles). Rehabilitation of the routes south of point 13. Rehabilitation of the lower section of Road 66.2B Estimated costs: FS Grant writing, crew supervision, volunteer coordination = $2500; OHV grant Crew salary, supplies, vehicle = $70,000. Construction crew = $120,000. Other grant funding Rehabilitation of Road 66.2B = $50,000. Construction year 4 (2017) will include OHV grant funding. Reconstruction of all the segments listed in the table. 7.87 miles total. Complete any existing rehabilitation. Route 66.2B will be rehabilitated. Estimated costs: FS Grant writing, crew supervision, volunteer coordination = $2500; OHV grant Crew salary, supplies, vehicle = $120,000 Summary of Resources Available for the 2014-2017 Schedule (Construction, Reconstruction, and Rehabilitation) 2014: 2-person OHV grant funded patrol/maint. crew - Maintenance of existing trails. Approximately 15 days. NFF funded Rocky Mountain Youth Corps Crews 2 to 3 weeks. VOC project in conjunction with FDRD - 100-200 people SCORR volunteer project days (approximately 4) and twilight projects (approximately 8) Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 9
2015 FDRD Two 1-day trail closure projects Colorado Statewide OHV crew- 6 days 4-person OHV grant funded crew. 2-person OHV grant funded patrol/maint. crew - Maintenance of existing trails. Approximately 15 days. NFF funded Rocky Mountain Youth Corps Crews 2 to 3 weeks. VOC project in conjunction with FDRD - 100-200 people SCORR volunteer project days (approximately 4) and twilight projects (approximately 8) FDRD Two 1-day trail closure projects Colorado Statewide OHV crew- 6 days 2016 4-person OHV grant funded crew. 2-person OHV grant funded patrol/maint. crew - Maintenance of existing trails. Approximately 15 days. NFF funded Rocky Mountain Youth Corps Crews 2 to 3 weeks. VOC project in conjunction with FDRD - 100-200 people SCORR volunteer project days (approximately 4) and twilight projects (approximately 8) FDRD Two 1-day trail closure projects Colorado Statewide OHV crew- 6 days Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 10
Figure 1 Example of a section of new trail through an area with sufficient openings. This is the dominant situation. Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 11
Figure 2 Example of a section of new trail through a thinned area where cutting of downed trees would be necessary. Off-trail use would be impossible. Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 12
Figure 3 In this section of trail through a stand of regeneration in a clearcut, the trail would use existing openings. Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 13
Figure 4 In this section of trail through a stand of regeneration in a clearcut, a few trees would have to be cut (marked with a star) because there is no opening. Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 14
Figure 5 7 Example of a section of new trail where some cuttingtree of downed cutting may treesbewill necessary. be necessary. The trees The trees marked marked with awith star awould star would be cut.be cut. Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 15
Figure 6 Example of a section of new trail where some tree cutting may be necessary. The trees marked with a star would be cut. Tenderfoot Mountain Motorcycle Trail System EA Appendix A Page 16