Prior to reviewing the various performances of Red Apple Transit, it is important to point out some key terminology, including:

Similar documents
Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

PLEASE READ Proposal for Sustainable Service

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

Current Operations CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION DESCRIPTION OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

Bristol Virginia Transit

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

COLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN

METRO FLEET FUNDING HUMAN RESOURCES

ROUTE 110. St. Albans Downtown Shuttle ROUTE OVERVIEW

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

2018 Service Changes Ada County

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

NORTHERN NAPA VALLEY TRANSIT STUDY

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Chapter 5 Alternatives

COMO Bus Service Evaluation DRAFT COA. September 19, 2016

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

1 DEMAND RESPONSE OVERVIEW

ROUTE EVALUATION ROUTE 21 Denton County Transportation Authority

(This page intentionally left blank.)

YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

WESTERN EL DORADO COUNTY SHORT AND LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Executive Summary

4 YORK REGION TRANSIT DON MILLS SUBWAY STATION ACCESS AGREEMENT

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

3. Proposed Midwest Regional Rail System

Creating Sustainable Communities Through Public Transportation

Annual Transit Service Plan And Budget FY 2015/2016

CHAPTER 1 TRANSIT MARKET AREAS AND EXISTING SERVICE

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

Matt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

Executive Summary. Introduction. Community Assessment

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

* Data for prior months has been updated to reflect error corrections from missing passenger count data

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Annual Transit Ridership Monitoring Report Fiscal Year

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

SUB-REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Albany Area Metropolitan Planning Organization RTP Project Management Team

Sound Transit Operations January 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING

Service Performance 2010 Networked Family of Services

2.0 Miami-Dade Transit System Overview

TRI-COUNTY TRANSPORTATION FOR SENIORS AND/OR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTS

Transfort Strategic Operating Plan Final Report CITY OF FORT COLLINS

High-Volume Main St. Pad Site

CARSON CITY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Existing Transportation Providers

Link btwn Oper & Finance

Service Recommendation Plan. June 2018

Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation Authority

Annual Route Report Operating Data. Prepared for: Board of Directors. Final 4/26/2018

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon

Chapter 4. Ridecheck and Passenger Survey

For Lease Retail Space LUXURY

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

Swedish Service Routes, American Style: Local Bus for the Suburbs 70TH ANNUAL OHIO TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE OCTOBER 25, 2016

Albany Area Metropolitan Planning Organization RTP Project Management Team

Board of Directors Information Summary

ATTACHMENT NB 3.A. AVTA Fare Study. DRAFT Proposed Fare Structure Report

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG

EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Development of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level and BRT Route Pattern Alternatives

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Service Performance 2013 Networked Family of Services

Recommendation on bus/rail bus/rail experiments #78 Montrose Bus Six University of Chicago bus routes Six Westside/W est estside/w Suburban

STA MOVING FORWARD A plan for more and better transit services

September 2010 Service Reduction

II. Terminology and Basic

NOTES ON COST AND COST ESTIMATION by D. Gillen

St. Johns County Transit Development Plan Update

Lessons Learned from Rebuilding the Muni Subway Schedule Leslie Bienenfeld

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

Transcription:

CHAPTER IV INTRODUCTION Chapter IV presents an overview of operations and financial information for Red Apple Transit. Information on the current system ridership is also presented. This information was used to develop service presented later in the document. Information is organized as follows: a. System Overview b. Financial Overview c. Ridership Review Prior to reviewing the various performances of Red Apple Transit, it is important to point out some key terminology, including: Cost per Passenger-Trip (One-Way) - Total system costs (all operating expenses plus administrative costs plus capital costs on a depreciation schedule) divided by the number of passenger-trips. Costs and trips must be recorded over the same period of time. Cost per Vehicle-Hour - Total system costs divided by the sum of the number of hours that each vehicle is operated in service. The typical usage is vehicle revenue-hours. Cost per Vehicle-Mile - Total system costs divided by the total distance traveled by all vehicles in the system when they are in service. The typical usage is vehicle revenue-miles. Effectiveness - For a transportation system, the effect is that people are moved from one place to another (i.e., trips). Measures of the effectiveness of a transportation system are, for example, the number of trips taken on it or the number of individual persons that it serves. Or a transportation system can be evaluated in terms of its effectiveness toward a social goal; for example, the Page IV-1

number of persons who can take advantage of a particular social service because of the transportation system. Efficiency - The efficiency of a transportation system will be some measure of the relationship of system inputs to system outputs. Transit planning has generally expressed this efficiency measure in terms of the ability to minimize an input (i.e., costs) to produce a unit of output. The most-often-used measures are cost per passenger or cost per vehicle-mile. Fixed Costs - Typically those costs that are less (or not at all) sensitive to changes in service. They include such items as general supervision, overhead and administration, rents, and debt service. Fixed costs are differentiated from variable costs because they represent those costs that must be met whether the service operates or not. If the project runs into operating problems (e.g., loss of passengers), fixed costs will continue. Level of Service - In the transportation literature, level of service is generally defined as a measure of the convenience, comfort, safety, and utility of a system or system component (vehicle, facility, etc.) from the passenger s point of view. A variety of measures can be used to determine a particular component s level of service. In transit, level of service measures incorporate such factors as availability and frequency. Level of service is typically designated in six ranges from A (best) to F (worst) for a particular service measure based on the passenger s perception of a particular aspect of the transit service. One-Way Passenger-Trips This refers to the total number of boarding passengers. This measure can be used on individual routes or for the system of routes as a whole. Passenger-Miles - The sum of the trip distances traveled by all passengers. Passengers per Vehicle-Hour - The number of passenger-trips divided by the sum of the number of hours that each vehicle is operated. Passengers per Vehicle-Mile - The number of passenger-trips divided by the number of vehicle-miles provided by all vehicles. Page IV-2

Revenue-Hours and Miles - Those vehicle-hours and miles during which the transit vehicle is actively providing service to passengers. For fixed-route service, this includes all the time spent on routes when passengers may board the vehicle. For demand-response service, this includes all time spent in actively providing passenger service. It includes the time and miles between dropping off one passenger and picking up another even though there may be no passengers onboard at the time. Variable Costs - Those costs that are sensitive to changes in the actual level of service. They are usually affected by the vehicle-miles, vehicle-hours, or some other measure of level of service. Variable costs typically include such items as fuel, oil, tires and tubes, drivers wages, and other items of expense that are sensitive to the level of operation. Vehicles and equipment items purchased have life expectancies which require that a depreciation factor be included when figuring costs. Most typically, depreciation is figured on a straight-line basis with a 10 percent residual salvage value at the end of that time. The length of time depends on the type of vehicle. Vehicle-Hour - Either the time the engine is running or the time a driver is assigned to a vehicle; the operating time for a vehicle. Revenue-hours are the hours when the vehicle is operating and available for passenger service. Vehicle-Miles - The total number of miles driven on all vehicles used to provide passenger service. Revenue-miles are the miles operated by vehicles available for passenger service. RED APPLE OPERATIONAL REVIEW Vehicle Inventory The current inventory of vehicles that Red Apple Transit owns, for both fixedroute and paratransit service, is listed in Table IV-1. This table provides details about the vehicles including the model year and capacity. As shown in the table, Red Apple Transit currently owns 12 vehicles. The fleet is a combination of body-on-chassis vehicles and trolley buses. The seating capacity of the bodyon-chassis vehicles is 12 passengers, and the capacity for the trolleys is 29 passengers. These capacities are reduced when passengers in wheelchairs are served. Page IV-3

Page IV-4 Bus Year Make Model Type Seating w/o Wheelchair Wheelchair Positions 9794 2006 Ford E 350 Startrans Small Bus 12 2 151,501 9797 2006 Ford E 350 Startrans Small Bus 12 2 155,279 9798 2006 Ford E 350 Startrans Small Bus 12 2 161,139 9810 2006 Ford E 350 Startrans Small Bus 12 2 153,838 9825 2006 Ford E 350 Startrans Small Bus 12 2 151,708 9880 2006 Ford E 350 Startrans Small Bus 12 2 142,144 9883 2006 Ford E 350 Startrans Small Bus 12 2 138,755 10138 2009 Freightliner Main Street Hometown Trolley 29 2 New 10139 2009 Freightliner Main Street Hometown Trolley 29 2 New 10141 2009 Freightliner Main Street Hometown Trolley 29 2 New 10142 2009 Freightliner Main Street Hometown Trolley 29 2 New 10143 2009 Freightliner Main Street Hometown Trolley 29 2 New Source: Red Apple Transit, 2010. Table IV 1 Vehicle Inventory Miles

Farmington Routes Red Apple Transit service currently operates between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. The service provides three routes that operate within the city limits of Farmington only. These are the Red, Green, and Express Routes. Figure IV-1 shows a map of these three routes within the city. The Green and Red Routes operate in small loops and provide service in many of the residential neighborhoods. The Express Route serves as more of a shopping circulator, taking passengers to local malls and retail centers. These routes operate on 30- minute headways during the hours of operation. This requires two vehicles to operate on each of the Red and Green Routes due to the length of the routes (five total). Page IV-5

Page IV-6 Routes Transfer Point Express Stops Green Stops Red Stops Express Line Green Line Red Line Roads Northgate Apartments Ojo Court Airport Walmart Figure IV-1 Red Apple Transit Existing Routes Safeway PMS Clinic SJRMC Police Department Civic Center 28th & Crescent Smith's Mesa Shopping Center Senior Center State Office Building Murray & Butler Scott Ave. SSI Office Rocinante High School Apple Ridge Apartments Library Conquistador Apartments Orchard Plaza Ricketts Park/Aquatic Center MOC/Animas Park Mesa Village Apartments San Juan College KMART Walmart-Sams Club Animas Valley Mall Grocery Warehouse San Juan Apartments SJC Career Center Plaza Farmington Museum at Gateway San Juan College Energy School

Regional Routes In addition to the City of Farmington routes, Red Apple Transit also operates three routes that provide service between municipalities. These routes go between Farmington, Kirtland, Aztec, and Bloomfield. The routes have been named Tiger (Aztec), Bobcat (Bloomfield), and Bronco (Kirtland) and are shown in Figure IV-2. The regional routes currently have a limited number of stops along the route and operate three round-trips daily (at 7:30 a.m., 12:30 p.m., and 5:30 p.m.). Riders are able to transfer between the Farmington and regional routes at Orchard Plaza. Page IV-7

Page IV-8 Central Center/ Conoco Kirtland Tiger Stops Bobcat Stops Bronco Stops Transfer Point Regional Routes Bobcat Bronco Tiger Roads Mesa Mobile Home Park Figure IV-2 Regional Transit Routes Orchard Plaza Farmington Wildflower Drive SJC Detention Center McGee Park Westside Plaza Flora Vista Circle K SJRMC Ambulance Station Aztec Safeway Animas Village Apartments Bloomfield Aztec Pinos Blancos Apartments Bloomfield Cultural Center

Fares Table IV-2 shows the fare structure for Red Apple Transit. The system uses a system which allows riders to easily know the appropriate fare. Trips on the Farmington routes cost $1.00 for a one-way trip. The fare for a one-way trip on a regional route is $2.00. Students, seniors (over 65), the disabled, and individuals with Medicaid/Medicare cards pay half-price (either $0.50 or $1.00). Children aged 11 and under are able to ride for free if they are with a paying adult. Table IV-2 Fare Structure Category Fare Within the City of Farmington $1.00 Routes outside of Farmington $2.00 Seniors, Students, Disabled, Medicare Customers Half-Price Children 11 and younger Free Source: Red Apple Transit, 2010. Revenues The revenue required to operate the transit system in Farmington comes from a variety of sources including local government, federal grants, and county assistance. Table IV-3 provides the existing revenue sources through FY2009. Nationally, very little revenue is typically taken in through farebox recovery, especially for smaller transit systems. These data show that farebox revenues account for 10.3 percent of total operating revenues. Page IV-9

Table IV-3 FY2009 Revenues Revenue Type Amount FTA Revenue (Operations) $294,759 FTA Revenue (Capital) $34,349 City of Farmington $344,449 City of Aztec $16,937 City of Bloomfield $10,384 San Juan County $28,476 Fares $83,422 Total $812,776 Source: Red Apple Transit, for July 2008-June 2009. RIDERSHIP Figure IV-3 shows the ridership by month for 2009 for the Farmington routes. The Green Route has the most passengers by far, with the Express Route generally drawing the least ridership of the three. Trends in ridership stay fairly consistent throughout the three routes, with higher ridership in the late summer and early fall. The Express Route seems to have less variation in ridership than the other city routes. Looking at data from previous years, ridership has increased at a fairly steady rate for Red Apple Transit. With an established set of routes and a growing region, it is likely that an upward trend in ridership will continue for the foreseeable future. Figure IV-4 shows a similar graph, but for the regional routes. These routes get much less daily ridership than the city routes, so they were included in their own graphic to show the scale. The route that has the highest ridership is the Bobcat Route, which goes between Farmington and Bloomfield. The Tiger Route (Aztec) generally has the lowest ridership among the regional routes. While the regional routes also show a spike in ridership in the late summer, there is greater variation by month, which is accentuated by the fact that the ridership is smaller than the city routes; thus, a smaller difference in ridership appears to be a greater trend. Table IV-4 shows the information for local and regional routes for each month. Page IV-10

6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 Figure IV 3 Farmington 2009 Route Ridership by Month Green Rd Red Express Monthly Riders Page IV-11

600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Figure IV 4 Regional 2009 Route Ridership by Month Tiger Bronco Bobcat Monthly Riders Page IV-12

Page IV-13 Table IV 4 Route Ridership by Month for 2009 January February March April May June July August September October November December Green 4,288 4,611 5,087 4,713 4,393 4,794 5,036 5,119 4,823 4,497 4,557 4,837 Red 2,221 2,314 2,311 2,607 2,068 2,559 2,619 2,938 3,358 3,136 3,076 2,810 Express 2,027 2,185 2,147 2,275 2,170 2,179 2,403 2,400 2,269 1,998 2,088 2,152 Tiger 194 171 183 203 162 152 205 248 198 261 294 235 Bronco 236 189 294 270 200 235 303 334 296 277 309 283 Bobcat 460 448 430 358 352 399 433 494 471 426 438 367 Source: Red Apple Transit, 2010.

Table IV-5 shows the ridership trends for the regional routes over the last four years. As shown in the table, all of the regional routes have experienced significant growth over the last four years, now totaling over 10,000 trips per year. The Bobcat has the highest amount of ridership, followed by the Bronco route. Table IV-5 Regional Route Ridership 2006 2007 2008 2009 Tiger 1,720 2,390 2,349 2,494 Bobcat 651 2,759 5,208 4,986 Bronco 860 1,624 2,191 3,244 Total 3,231 6,773 9,748 10,724 Source: Red Apple Transit. Cost Model Based on 2009 data for operations and maintenance, a cost model was developed. This cost model was used to estimate the costs of future service scenarios including both service adjustments and service expansion. Costs were divided into three categories: fixed/administrative, operating, and maintenance. The costs were divided by the units of service delivery service hours for operating and service miles for maintenance. Cost Center Cost Units Fixed/Administrative: $107,699 1 Operating: $565,950 22,800 hours Maintenance: $154,342 378,912 miles The resulting cost model for total costs is: $107,700 + $24.82/hour x Hours of Service + $0.41/mile x Miles of Service For incremental or marginal costs, the model is: $24.82/hour x Hours of Service + $0.41/mile x Miles of Service Page IV-14

As a single-variable cost model, all reduced to cost per hour, Red Apple Transit operates at $31.59/hour = ($565,950 + 154,352)/22,800. The current number of hours is estimated to require 14.3 full-time-equivalent operators at approximately 86.5 percent utilization (1,800 hours worked of 2,080, after vacation, sick, and holiday benefits as well as annual training time.) This number was used for expansion scenarios to estimate the growth in staffing needs. OTHER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES In addition to services provided by Red Apple Transit, there are a few other providers active within the area. A couple of these providers run scheduled service, while others are human service agencies that provide service as needed for their clients. Senior Centers Aztec Senior Center Local senior centers often play a key role in human service transportation. The study area has three different senior centers. The Aztec Senior Center has four nine-passenger vans that are used to help transport clients. The vans are used to transport individuals to the center between 8:00 and 9:20 a.m., and for the reverse trip at around 12:45 p.m. The center serves Aztec as well as Flora Vista. In total, approximately 8 to 12 one-way rides are provided daily via the Aztec Senior Center. Farmington Senior Center The Farmington Senior Center also provides some transportation services within the area. The agency can provide transportation between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on weekdays, for individuals over the age of 60 within the City of Farmington. The agency has two 13-passenger vans, along with a 20-passenger bus. These vehicles are used for various activities within the area. Bloomfield also has a senior center; however, specifics on the transportation services they provide were not available at this time. Page IV-15

Intercity Services Navajo Transit Navajo Transit operates the Number 7 Shiprock/Window Rock Route, which has stops in Kirtland and Farmington (at American Plaza). This route has two different weekly schedules one for Monday and Friday, and the other for Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. Service on Monday and Friday stops at Kirtland in the eastbound direction at 6:45 a.m. and 5:08 p.m., and in the westbound direction at 7:17 a.m. and 5:35 p.m. In Farmington the stops are at American Plaza at 7:00 a.m. and 5:20 p.m. The Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday schedule includes the aforementioned times, as well as a midday run, which stops in Farmington at 1:55 p.m. The additional Tuesday through Thursday stop in Kirtland is at 1:35 p.m. in the eastbound direction and, though not scheduled, would reach Kirtland at 2:17 p.m. in the westbound direction. The fare is $2.00 daily for the service. Navajo Nation Transit has reached an agreement with Greyhound, for Navajo Nation Transit to serve as the intercity provider between Shiprock and Farmington. Road Runner Transit Through mid-2010, the Southern Ute Tribe which operates Road Runner Transit operated bus service between Ignacio and Aztec. The service operated seven round-trips daily and cost $4.50. A one-way trip takes approximately 45 minutes, and the termini of the route are in Aztec and the Sky Ute Casino. As of late 2010, this service was discontinued, after grant funding elapsed. Pending reapplication, this service may resume. TNM&O/Greyhound TNM&O (now part of Greyhound) has a station in Farmington that allows users to connect to intercity bus service. The station is located on East Animas Street, east of the downtown area. The majority of longer trips require that users transfer in either Grand Junction or Albuquerque. Buses are currently scheduled to leave Farmington twice daily, once at 4:55 a.m. and again at 11:00 p.m. Page IV-16

Having access to intercity bus services is an important part of the larger transportation network, especially for users that need to travel long distances, but cannot afford rail or air travel. There is immediate access to intercity rail services, with the nearest Amtrak station being located in Gallup, approximately 88 miles away. Other Providers San Juan Community College While San Juan Community College does not provide specific transportation outside of incidental travel for class purposes, they are a key player in the local landscape. With three separate campuses (Farmington, Aztec, and Kirtland), coordination opportunities between the organizations could help to strengthen ridership while allowing students to attend classes more reliably (especially regarding night classes). The opportunity also exists to add an additional stop at the Health and Human Performance Center on campus. San Juan Center for Independence The San Juan Center for Independence is an organization that operates an independent living center for individuals with disabilities. As part of their overall mission, some transportation services are provided for this population. Safe Ride Services Safe Ride Services, a division of First Transit, has an office in the Kirtland area. The organization provides door-to-door, non-emergency medical transportation. Most of the services the organization provides are on behalf of local health organizations and hospitals. Page IV-17