Cumberland Conservation Corridor

Similar documents
NCC SUBMISSION ON EXPLANATION OF INTENDED EFFECT: STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING POLICY NO 44 KOALA HABITAT PROTECTION

Submission to NSW Koala Strategy Consultation Process. March 2017

Conservation Partners for the National Reserve System Program: a Western NSW focus

Cumberland Land Conservancy Inc 2017 ABN PO Box 119 Plumpton NSW 2761

The Conservation Contributions of Ecotourism Cassandra Wardle

NARRABEEN LAGOON SUMMIT am Wednesday, 13 April 2005 Warringah Council Chambers, 725 Pittwater Road, Dee Why.

Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan

WESTERN SYDNEY PARKLANDS PLAN 2020 CORPORATE

A THRIVING ENVIRONMENTAL AND RECREATIONAL PRECINCT IN OUR SOUTHERN SUBURBS

SUBMISSION FROM BIG SCRUB LANDCARE ON THE DRAFT NSW BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION BILL AND ACCOMPANYING LEGISLATION AND CODES

GLENTHORNE NATIONAL PARK OUR NEW BACKYARD

Gawler Environment and Heritage Association Inc, C/- 42 Finniss Street Gawler SA 5118

Kilometres. Blacktown. Penrith. Parramatta. Liverpool Bankstown. Campbelltown

This is a submission to Council s Delivery Plan and Operational Plan

Appendix F Public authorities responses

Draft Western District Plan

Department of Environment, Climate Change & Water NSW. Stakeholder feedback

Submission on the Tukituki Catchment Proposal: EPA reference numbers; NSP 13/ , NSP 13/ , NSP 13/ , NSP 13/02.

They were accompanied by Mary Gray, President of the Urban Bushland Council of Western Australia.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Strategies and Land Release

Building a world leading protected area system for Queensland

Waterside. Your new home by the water.

WAIKARAKA CYCLEWAY: LESSONS LEARNT. Daniel Newcombe & Ina Stenzel Auckland City Council

2 DESCRIPTION OF CALLAN PARK

Mimosa Creek Precinct Landscape Plan

Caroona Coal Project. Gunnedah Coal Conference 20 September 2006

The private financing of airport infrastructure expansions

We do not support the proposals set out in the Crown Lands Legislation White Paper (White Paper).

Draft Western District Plan

County of Cumberland Plan Sydney Region Outline Plan

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW SUMMARY

Chairman, Environmental Protection Authority,Government of Western Australia

F.J. Martin Roberts Evening (Mt Coot-tha from Dutton Park) 1898

Rouge National Park. Opportunities and Challenges

Land use and natural resource management

PROTECTED AREAS ZONE - POLICY

1.1 Parklands for Western Sydney

Item 1 Ryhope Paper Subdivision

European Union Delegation in Albania Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Presence in Albania

Draft Western District Plan

Policy PL Date Issued February 10, 2014

Green Fields Leppington

PORT STEPHENS COUNCIL COMPREHENSIVE KOALA PLAN OF MANAGEMENT (CKPoM) Prepared by Port Stephens Council with the Australian Koala Foundation

June 29 th 2015 SOS LEMURS SPECIAL INITIATIVE

National Parks Association of Queensland Inc. Submission on Waratah Coal Galilee Coal Project Environmental Impact Statement 19 th November 2011

Sporting Shooters Association of Australia Victoria Ltd

Territory Eco-link: large framework, small budget

BABIA GÓRA DECLARATION ON SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN MOUNTAIN AREAS

Energex Loganlea to Jimboomba Network Upgrade Response to Supplementary IAR. Closes 8 April Submission by

New Runway Project. Connecting people and places. Supporting business. Engaging with community

Submission in response to. Towards our Greater Sydney 2056

PCAL Case Study Retail Areas: Rouse Hill Town Centre

Ecological Corridors: Legal Framework for the Baekdu Daegan Mountain System (South Korea) Katie Miller* Kim Hyun**

Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan

Land Management Summary

Global Sustainable Tourism Destinations Criteria

Wildlife Tourism Australia Workshop. Commercial and philanthropic opportunities for enhancing wildlife conservation through Ecotourism

1. The purpose of this report is to seek the Works, Traffic and Environment Committee s recommendation for:

Section 1 Introduction to Sustainable Tourism

BRIEF TO THE ROYAL COMMISSION ON ABORIGINAL PEOPLES THE NUNAVIK CONSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEE

TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION TO THE GREATER SYDNEY COMMISSION LANDS AT ARTARMON

Caloundra South overview Ben Allen, General Manager Sustainable Communities

JUNE 2007 UPDATE REPORT SYDNEY METROPOLITAN STRATEGY

Draft LAW. ON SOME AMENDAMENTS IN THE LAW No.9587, DATED ON THE PROTECTION OF BIODIVERSITY AS AMENDED. Draft 2. Version 1.

PO Box 257 PO Box 257 PARRAMATTA NSW 2124 PARRAMATTA NSW 2124

Four Wheel Driving in the Sydney Region

Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan

Papua New Guinea. National (World) Heritage. Country Report

DIGITAL WESTERN PARKLAND CITY

Draft Illawarra Escarpment Mountain Bike Strategy. A joint project between National Parks and Wildlife Service and Wollongong City Council

ULDA Update Yarrabilba Project The Developers Perspective Tanya Martin Project Planner Communities Lend Lease June 2011

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

Andy Sharp Natural Resources Northern & Yorke. Brooke Liebelt Yorke Peninsula Tourism

The South Gippsland Koala. For over 60 years, the plantation industry has shared a unique relationship with the Strzelecki Koala. protection.

#SOSGreenSpaces #SaveSydneysKoalas #SaveOurKoalas

Establishing a National Urban Park in the Rouge Valley

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

33. Coiba National Park and its Special Zone of Marine Protection (Panama) N 1138 rev)

Planning and Building Department

CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Thursday, July 19, :00 PM City Hall, Council Chambers, Claremont, NH. MINUTES Approved 8/16/2018

Key Insights to Sydney Western Suburbs

BILL S-210: A REASONABLE STATUTORY FRAMEWORK TO PROTECT GATINEAU PARK

Newcastle Transport Program Newcastle Light Rail Determination Report

2 THE MASTER PLAN 23

MEDIA RELEASE 18 April 2016 Trainee Aboriginal Riverkeeper Team save Aboriginal culture and the local environment

Presentation to Planning Panel

Land Reform Biodiversity Stewardship in KZN. Making protected areas drivers of rural economic development

fact sheet fact sheet Minnippi Masterplan. Squirrel Glider Habitat Public Open Space Medium Density Proposed Public Golf Course Medium Density

MANUAL OF SUSTAINABILITY POLICIES. Hotel Lomas del Volcán 2018

Islay Offshore Wind Farm

Protected Areas & Ecotourism

DRAFT PLAN OF MANAGEMENT MASSY GREENE

Quintessential Rare Plant Site Protected, Forever Celebrating the New Wilsons Lake Conservation Lands

Implementation Framework. Expression of Interest. Queensland Ecotourism Investment Opportunities. Ecotourism Facilities on National Parks

Legislation Having Application to James Cook University as at 30 June 2013

Review of Environmental Factors

photos Department of Environment and Conservation Biodiversity Conservation

Southern Highlands Koala Conservation Project. Joe Stammers Environmental Projects Officer Wingecarribee Shire Council

Assessing and Protecting the World s Heritage. Assessing and Protecting the World s Heritage

Transcription:

Cumberland Conservation Corridor A concept for protecting and managing the remnant Ecological Communities of the Cumberland Plain. A call for the NSW Government to commit funding and resources towards the urgent establishment of the Cumberland Conservation Corridor Map incomplete - extends to the North 1

Cumberland Conservation Corridor Over 30kms in length and 10,000 hectares in size. Twice the size of the Western Sydney Parklands. A true conservation outcome. There is a need in Western Sydney to properly protect and manage the remnant Ecological Communities of the Cumberland Plain. Whilst all remnants of bushland provide some habitat for flora and fauna, protection of the largest remnants is seen as most important as they provide habitat for a greater diversity of native species. To maintain a diversity of species it is therefore important that there be connectivity; corridors that link areas of habitat. This allows the migration of species between remnants and safeguards against the chance of localised extinctions should there be a disaster within an isolated remnant. (e.g. clearing of land, fire etc.) The Cumberland Conservation Corridor concept will see a continuous connection of large bushland remnants stretching from Mulgoa Nature Reserve to Agnes Banks Nature Reserve. The majority of land needed to create the Corridor is owned by the NSW Government, the Federal Government and the Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council. Some private lands will be needed including the 181 hectare former Air Services Australia site at Cranebrook, owned by a property developer, IFC Capital Ltd. The creation of the corridor can be seen as an offset to the imminent destruction of Cumberland Plain Ecological Communities within the proposed Growth Centres. Acquiring the land for the Corridor Some land needed to create the corridor will have to be acquired and this can be achieved by utilising funding sources such as the Conservation Offset Program which is to be managed by the NSW Governments Growth Centres Commission (GCC). The draft Conservation Plan placed on public exhibition by the GCC indicates on page 21 that $530 million will be generated for the purpose of offsetting the loss of vegetation within the Growth Centres and that 75% of that $530 million, some $400 million, will be used for conservation offsets outside the Growth Centres. This signals that there will be money to acquire sites for the establishment of the corridor. It is acknowledged that these GCC funds will not be available immediately but will become available over the 30 year lifetime of the Growth Centres development. We cannot wait another decade or more for funding to protect these bushland remnants. What is then needed is for the NSW Government to step in and show its support for the corridor proposal by bankrolling the immediate acquisition of some key corridor sites, such as the former Air 2

Services Australia site at Cranebrook, which is under imminent threat from urban development. The NSW Government can then be reimbursed by the GCC from the very first lot of collected developer funds. Private landowners whose land is needed for the corridor should be approached by the GCC on behalf of the NSW Government to work out the best and most economical way to establish the corridor on their land. Options would obviously include the GCC purchasing the land or entering into some type of conservation agreement that pays the landowner to manage their land for conservation. If acquisition is agreed then the owner should be offered a generous price, this may encourage greater participation by other landowners and negate any opposition to the corridor concept. Many of the sites needed to establish the corridor are owned by the NSW and Federal Governments. They include: NSW Government Mulgoa Nature Reserve ADI Site Regional Park Castlereagh Nature Reserve Former Castlereagh Liquid Waste Dump John Moroney and Dillwynia Correctional Centres Windsor Downs Nature Reserve Agnes Banks Nature Reserves Possible lands owned by Dept of Lands. Land along South and Ropes Creek The Federal Government Orchard Hills RAAF/RAN base Shanes Park Air Services Australia Site The fact these lands are already publicly owned means the cost of establishing the corridor can be substantially minimised. The Federal Government should be encouraged to gift their land to the NSW Government for the Corridor. If they refuse to do so or become obstructionist then it may be necessary to rezone their land for conservation. Note: the Nth West Growth Centres SEPP zones the entire ASA site at Shanes Park as a conservation area. The Planning Minister did this without consulting with the owner, the Federal Government. This rezoning precedent indicates that land, whilst ownership is being negotiated, can be set aside for conservation through a rezoning by local consent authorities. As the NSW Government has shown Commonwealth owned land can be rezoned for conservation prohibiting the Federal Government from developing that land. 3

Note: Of course the Federal Government can override State and Local Governments if it needs to but this would be unwise because large areas of these two sites are Commonwealth Heritage Listed meaning the Federal Environment Minister is obliged to protect them. It would be politically stupid of the Federal Government to oppose the conservation of these sites. Penrith City Council is amending its Local Environmental Plan at the moment and it too has the power to effectively rezone huge areas of bushland within its LGA for conservation protection. There is nothing stopping Council from rezoning over 1300 hectares of the Orchard Hills RAAF/RAN base for conservation, as this land is needed for the corridor. If the NSW Government wants to support the corridor proposal then it should be urging Penrith Council, in its LEP process, to rezone as much of the corridor for conservation as possible. This would then make acquiring parts of the corridor land much cheaper. This is what should happen for the former ASA site at Cranebrook. The landowner has a rezoning application before Council at this moment and a conservation rezoning of the whole site by Council would make the site worthless to IFC Capital Ltd, the developer owner. If Council had the will to do so they could get on with determining the rezoning application of IFC Capital and gift a further 181 ha of high conservation land to the people of Western Sydney, not to mention the NSW Government. The NSW Government should then urgently acquire Cranebrook. The Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council owns several large properties needed for the corridor. The GCC and DEC should negotiate a long term lease arrangement for these lands. History of the Corridor The concept of establishing a conservation corridor across a large part of Western Sydney is not new. In 1997 a Penrith City Council Report Fauna and Flora Corridors Study, Conserving Biodiversity in the Penrith Local Government Area identified many of the same sites as has been proposed here. This report recommended the creation of the corridor ten years ago as a necessary strategy to ensure the protection of Penrith s biodiversity. Nothing has been done by Penrith Council to raise awareness of the need to formalise the corridor and ensure large parts of Western Sydney s bushland remnants are protected and properly managed in perpetuity. The NSW Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) is well aware of what is needed to create this corridor, it is obvious. Certain DEC staff has for many years been working on identifying lands within Western Sydney needed as environmental offsets to counter the massive urban development occurring in the Sydney Basin. The reasons why DEC has not moved to protect more of Western Sydney s bushland remnants are unknown. One can only assume the reasons are a lack of money and a lack of political will. The Growth Centres funding now means there are no excuses not to act. 4

Urgent action is needed by the NSW Government The massive development pressures on Western Sydney s bushland remnants warrant an urgent response from the NSW Government. They must put in place permanent measures to ensure these bush remnants are protected and managed. NSW Government money is needed to initially establish the Cumberland Conservation Corridor. The NSW Government can be reimbursed by the GCC for land acquisitions once its Conservation Offset Program funds come on stream. What is needed now is political will. The GCC, Department of Planning and DEC should be sitting down and working out how to move this forward. NGO stakeholders should be consulted and included in the process. Development within the North and South West Growth Centres has been locked in by the NSW Government and will result in the destruction of a large combined area of Cumberland Plain vegetation. The Government is talking of offsetting this huge loss by protecting land outside of the Growth Centres in perpetuity. Such a huge environmental loss must be countered by a huge win and this Cumberland Conservation Corridor should be seen by all, including our political leaders, as a winner. We should no longer tolerate the trashing of our precious bushland due to a lack of management and resources. It would be ideal if the proposed corridor was put into the management of the DEC and GCC funds went to DEC for management costs. Many of the corridor sites should be purchased by the NSW Government and put into DEC ownership to form part of the NSW Reserves System. References http://www.gcc.nsw.gov.au/media/5332/western%20sydney%20growth%20centres%20conservation%20plan_final_e xib%e2%80%a6.pdf http://www.penrithcity.nsw.gov.au/uploadedfiles/website/environment/leps/draftflorafaunalep1999map1.pdf Former Air Services Australia site at Cranebrook 5