NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Similar documents
Attachment No. 20 RRLRT No. 1. Committee. Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

SCOPE Chapter 2D shall Apply to Any Road or

PART 2. SIGNS Chapter 2D. Guide Signs - Conventional Roads

MEMORANDUM. ~Department. TO: District Engineers DATE: February 3,2012. Texas. Carol T. Rawson, P.E., Director ~ t~ Pt Traffic Operations Division C /"

Sign Design Manual (SDM) Revision Log (TEM Section 295-2) April 17, 2009 Revision

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT May 10, Members of the Planning Commission. Joyce Parker-Bozylinski, Contract Planner

POLICY DCS-04: Tourism Directional Sign Policy. Development and Cultural Services

K SIGNAGE & TRAFFIC CONTROL. Table of Contents

An Orientation to Today s Webinar

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

County of Elgin Tourism Signage Policy Addendum A

PROPOSED HORIZONTAL LAYOUT FILLET DESIGN FOR ENTRANCE/EXIT TAXIWAYS

Memorandum. Roger Millar, Secretary of Transportation. Date: April 5, Interstate 90 Operations and Mercer Island Mobility

CHAPTER 2H. RECREATIONAL, HISTORICAL MARKER, TRAFFIC GENERATOR AND CULTURAL INTEREST AREA SIGNS

2. Sign Types Signing for Canadian TODS qualified tourism attractions, services and facilities has been divided into two categories:

Sign Library. Florida Trail Association

Master Minimum Equipment Lists/Minimum Equipment Lists. Amendment Summary PART-MMEL/MEL. Amendment No. Effective Date Subpart Paragraph

ICAO Standards. Airfield Information Signs. ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations

Current Activities Affecting FAA ADs

1.2 Corridor History and Current Characteristics

Certification Memorandum. Large Aeroplane Evacuation Certification Specifications Cabin Crew Members Assumed to be On Board

The Highway as a Public Forum: Effects on Safety and Operations

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES-AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STUDY GROUP (AIS-AIMSG)

PART 2. SIGNS Chapter 2M. Recreational and Cultural Interest Area Signs

HIGHWAY GUIDE AND INFORMATION SIGN MANUAL

March 13, Submitted electronically:

Navigating Indiana Road Signage

12, 14 and 16 York Street - Amendments to Section 16 Agreement and Road Closure Authorization

This Section 1 contains the requirements for the approval of Master Minimum Equipment Lists and Minimum Equipment Lists.

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-080-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

Wayfinding and Signage Study

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. SUBJECT: TORONTO-YORK SPADINA SUBWAY EXTENSION STATION NAMES IN THE CITY OF VAUGHAN

PART 71. Designation Of Class A And C Airspace; Air Traffic Service Routes; Designation Of Airways; And Reporting Points

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES MANUAL FOR WORK ZONES

22-23 Pavement Marking Items. (Pages 7 & 8 removed)

2. CANCELLATION. AC 39-7B, Airworthiness Directives, dated April 8, 1987, is canceled.

Amendment 37,38 to Annex 15 Amendment 57 to Annex 4

Amendment Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-164-AD

SUPERSEDED [ U] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Federal Aviation Administration. 14 CFR Part 39 [66 FR /17/2001]

Picnic Units A picnic unit is a part of a picnic area

Via Only. In reply refer to/attn: Place ID:794813:ERyan

2003 Edition - Revision 1 Page 2F-1

Outdoor Developed Areas

What s covered. What s not covered. Options for those not covered. ABA Coverage

Snowmobile Trail Signing REF: DNR Trail Signing Handbook

R2 CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY

FEASIBILITY STUDY REFINED CONCEPT 1 PROJECT A

THE BOEING COMPANY

DRAFT FINAL ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR OUTDOOR DEVELOPED AREAS

New ADA Accessibility Standards for the Attractions Industry

The Aviation Rulemaking Committee is changing. how airworthiness directives are developed and implemented.

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-252-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

SERVICE ADVISORY. NO.: 0608 Revision A. All Garmin Aviation Service Centers

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-180-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

SUPERSEDED [ U] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Federal Aviation Administration. 14 CFR Part 39 [66 FR /5/2001]

Project Deliverable 4.1.3d Individual City Report - City of La Verne

The Baker/Carver Regional Trail is intended to

PARKS CANADA SIGNING ALONG PROVINCIAL HIGHWAYS

MEMORANDUM. Lynn Hayes LSA Associates, Inc.

SUPERSEDED. [Docket No NM-148-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Council Policy Tourist Oriented Destination Signs

SUPERSEDED. [Docket No NM-115-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Mission Statement. Spur 601 Project Highlights

Development of FTL for commercial air transport operations of emergency medical services by aeroplanes and helicopters NPA Number NPA

Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172R and 172S Airplanes

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

[Docket No. 93-CE-37-AD; Amendment ; AD R1]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-NM-025-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

Amendment Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2002-NM-12-AD

Aero Design Battery Shop

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS CENTER (AFMC) WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE OHIO

SITE ELEVATION AMSL...Ground Elevation in feet AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT...Height Above Ground Level OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...Total Overall Height AMSL

Aaron Marcus and Associates, Inc Euclid Avenue, Suite 1F Berkeley, CA , USA

FLIGHT CONTROLS- RUDDER CABLE PULLEY BRACKET INSPECTION/REPAIR

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

McLean Citizens Association Transportation Committee Project Briefing

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

10-10F, DC-10-30, DC-10-30F, DC-10-40, MD-10-30F, MD-11,

[Docket No CE-24-AD; Amendment ; AD ] Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Model 172RG Airplanes

R1 CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY

ROAD TRAFFIC (PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS) (JERSEY) ORDER 1982

C DASSAULT AVIATION

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-124-AD] Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

FHWA Actions on Past Interstate Requests that were approved by the USRN were presented and conditions were lifted. FHWA Approval Date

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-CE-049-AD; Amendment ; AD R1]

FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE FACILITIES IN VIRGINIA. Catherine C. McGhee Senior Research Scientist

Registry Publication 15

Hiawatha National Forest St. Ignace Ranger District. File Code: 1950 Date: August 5, 2011

United States Department of the Interior National Park Service. Boundary Expansion Listed in National Register January 11, 2017

THE BOEING COMPANY

Proposed At-grade Crossings of Officially Recognized Trails Port MacKenzie Rail Extension Project

Subpart A General Purpose... 7

Antenna Tower Positioning System

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-208-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

THE BOEING COMPANY

The Transportation Corridor Overlay District

SERVICE BULLETIN MANDATORY SB Planning Information TITLE:

Transcription:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: ITEM NUMBER: TOPIC: ORIGIN OF REQUEST: AFFECTED SECTIONS OF MUTCD: NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Attachment No.: 10 Item No.: 18B-GMI-01 GMI Committee 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Missouri DOT (MoDOT) Section 2E.31 Interchange Exit Numbering, Figure 2E-19 Examples of Interchange Numbering for Mainline and Circumferential Routes, Figure 2E-20 Example of Interchange Numbering for Mainline, Loop, and Spur Routes, Figure 2E-21 Example of Interchange Numbering or Overlapping Routes DEVELOPMENT HISTORY: Approved by Technical Committee: 06/21/2018 and 01/09/2019 Approved by NCUTCD Council: 01/10/2019 This is a proposal for recommended changes to the MUTCD that has been approved by the NCUTCD Council. This proposal does not represent a revision of the MUTCD and does not constitute official MUTCD standards, guidance, or options. It will be submitted to FHWA for consideration for inclusion in a future MUTCD revision. The MUTCD can be revised only through the federal rulemaking process. SUMMARY: The proposed changes contained in this ballot elaborate on the guidance found in the current MUTCD in the text and figures for exit numbering with the enhancements based on letters of interpretation supplied by the MUTCD team. Currently, the majority of the guidance for various exit numbering scenarios is only conveyed via the figures in the manual. In addition to adding clarifying text, the proposal also modifies the existing figures by eliminating details to make each existing figure clearer and easier to use and relate more clearly to the title of each figure. All the additional interchange configurations and exit numbering examples deleted from these figures are now being represented in a new figure. DISCUSSION The MUTCD provides guidance for exit numbering in both text and figure form, however, the text relies heavily on interpretation of the figures for many details and the figures can be overwhelming with the amount of detail provided. The exit numbering sequences, which are important details on these figures, are difficult to pick out with the various examples of 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 1 of 11

33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 interchanges overlaid along the roadway segments. While these example interchange images provide useful information on how exit numbers relate to interchange design and placement, they are out of context with respect to the key purpose of each figure. This information was removed from the three original figures and consolidated into one new figure to more clearly illustrate the information. These changes are being recommended based primarily on an interpretation MoDOT received from FHWA on the proper choice of exit numbers as well as input from GMI technical committee members. The intent of these changes is to enhance both the text and figure guidance to make it clearer without altering the original intent of the manual. RECOMMENDED MUTCD CHANGES The following present the proposed changes to the current MUTCD within the context of the current MUTCD language. Proposed additions to the MUTCD are shown in blue underline and proposed deletions from the MUTCD are shown in red strikethrough. Changes previously approved by NCUTCD Council (but not yet adopted by FHWA) are shown in green double underline for additions and green double strikethrough for deletions. In some cases, background comments may be provided with the MUTCD text. These comments are indicated by [highlighted light blue in brackets]. Section 2E.31 Interchange Exit Numbering Support: 01 Interchange exit numbering provides valuable orientation for the road user on a freeway or expressway. The feasibility of numbering interchanges or exits on an expressway will depend largely on the extent to which grade separations are provided. Where there is appreciable continuity of interchange facilities, interrupted only by an occasional intersection intersection at grade, the numbering will be helpful to the expressway user. Standard: 02 Interchange exit numbering shall be used in signing each freeway interchange exit departure point. Interchange exit numbers shall be displayed with each Advance Guide sign, Exit Direction sign, and Exit Gore sign. The exit number shall be displayed on a separate plaque at the top of the Advance Guide or Exit Direction sign. The exit number (E1-5P) plaque (see Figure 2E-22) shall be 30 inches in height and shall include the word EXIT and the appropriate exit number in a single-line format. Suffix letters shall be used for exit numbering at a multi-exit interchange. Exit suffix letters shall only be used to supplement exit numbers. Exit suffix letters shall be used when there is more than one exit departure point within the limits of a mile segment. The suffix letter shall also be included on the exit number plaque and shall be separated from the exit number by a space having a width of between 1/2 and 3/4 of the height of the suffix letter. Exit numbers shall not include the cardinal initials corresponding to the directions of the cross route. The Mminimum numeral and letter sizes are given in Tables 2E-2 through 2E-5. If used on expressways, the interchange exit numbering system for expressways and non-interstate freeways shall comply with the provisions of this section.prescribed for freeways.interstates. 03 At a multi-exit interchange an interchange with multiple exit departure points from the mainline where suffix letters are used for exit numbering, an exit of the same number without a suffix letter shall not be used on the same route in the same direction. For example, if an exit is designated as EXIT 256 A, then there shall not be an exit designated 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 2 of 11

79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 as EXIT 256 on the same route in the same direction. Exit suffix letters shall increase or decrease in the same manner as exit numbering as described in paragraphs 10-15. 04 Interchange exit numbering shall use the reference location sign exit numbering method. The consecutive exit numbering method shall not be used. Support: 05 Reference location sign exit numbering assists road users in determining their destination distances and travel mileage, and assists highway agencies because the exit numbering sequence does not have to be changed if new interchanges are added to a route. Guidance: 05a Exit numbering should be determined based on where the cross road of the interchange intersects the mainline with respect to the mainline mile segments. For example, if a cross road intersects the mainline at or after mile 15 and before mile 16 the interchange should be designated as EXIT 15 (see Drawing A of Figure 2E-XX). If a cross road is split into two roadways by direction, for example a split diamond, where one direction of the cross road is down stream of mile 18 and the other direction of the cross road is upstream of mile 18, the interchange exit number should be based on the mile marker located between the two roadways (see Drawings A and B of Figure 2E-XX). 05b Where exit suffix letters are used for interchanges with multiple exit departure points from the mainline and the number of exit departure points are not equal in both directions, the exit suffix lettering should be based on the number of departure points per direction. For example, if in one direction there are three exit departure points within the mile 25 segment, there should be an EXIT 25 A, EXIT 25 B and EXIT 25 C; however, if in the opposite direction there are only two exit departure points, the exits in that direction should be designated as EXIT 25 B followed by EXIT 25 A (see Drawing D of Figure 2E-XX). 05c Exit suffix letters should only be used to designate individual exit departure points from the mainline When a ramp splits into two ramps after leaving the mainline, the two directions at the ramp splits should not be numbered with separate exit numbers or exit suffix letters (see Drawings A and D of Figure 2E-19). Option: 06 Exit numbers may also be used with Supplemental Guide signs and Motorist Service signs. Guidance: 0706 Exit number (E1-5P) plaques should be added to the top right-hand edge of the advance guide and exit direction signs for an exit to the right. Standard: 0807 Because road users might not expect an exit to the left and might have difficulty in maneuvering to the left, a left exit number (E1-5bP) plaque (see Figure 2E-22) shall be added to the top left-hand edge of the sign for all left-hand exits (see Figures 2E-14 and 2E- 15). The word LEFT on the E1-5bP plaque shall be a black legend on a yellow rectangular sign panel and shall be centered above the word EXIT. Support: 0908 Example exit number plaque designs are shown in Figure 2E-22. Figures 2E-3, 2E-7, 2E-22, 2E-26, and 2E-27 illustrate the incorporation of exit number plaques on guide signs. 1009 The general plan for numbering interchange exits is shown in Figures 2E-19 through 2E-21. Figure 2E-19 shows a circumferential route, which is a route that makes a complete circle around a city or town and usually has two interchanges (one on each side of the city or town) with each of the mainline routes that travel through the city or town. Figure 2E-20 shows a loop route, which is 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 3 of 11

125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 a route that departs from a mainline route and then rejoins the same mainline route at a subsequent point downstream, and a spur route, which is a route that departs from a mainline route and never rejoins the same mainline route. Figure 2E-21 shows two mainline routes that overlap each other. Standard: 1110 Regardless of whether a mainline route originates within a State or crosses into a State from another State, the southernmost or westernmost terminus within that State shall be the beginning point for interchange exit numbering. 1211 For circumferential routes, interchange exit numbering shall be in a clockwise direction. The numbering shall begin with the first interchange west of the south end of an imaginary north-south line bisecting the circumferential route, at a radial freeway or other Interstate route, or some other conspicuous landmark in the circumferential route near a south polar location (see Figure 2E-19). 1312 The interchange exit numbers on loop routes shall begin at the loop interchange nearest the south or west mainline junction and increase in magnitude toward the north or east mainline junction (see Figure 2E-20). 1413 Spur route interchanges shall be numbered in ascending order starting at the interchange where the spur leaves the mainline route (see Figure 2E-20). 1514 If a circumferential, loop, or spur route crosses State boundaries, the numbering sequence shall be coordinated by the States to provide continuous interchange numbering. 1615 Where numbered routes overlap, continuity of interchange numbering shall be established for only one of the routes (see Figure 2E-21). If one of the routes is an Interstate and the other route is not an Interstate, the Interstate route shall maintain continuity of interchange numbering. Option: 15a Interchange exit numbers at the beginning of a loop or a spur route, at the point a route crosses a state line, or where a route simply begins within the boundaries of a state may be referenced as either EXIT 0 or EXIT 1. Guidance: 1716 The route chosen for continuity of interchange exit numbering should also have reference location sign continuity (see Figure 2E-21). 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 4 of 11

NEW FIGURE A B C D 155 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 5 of 11

REPLACED FIGURE 156 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 6 of 11

NEW FIGURE A E 9 B C D 157 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 7 of 11

REPLACED FIGURE 158 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 8 of 11

NEW FIGURE A B C 159 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 9 of 11

REPLACED FIGURE 160 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 10 of 11

NEW FIGURE A B 161 18B-GMI-01 Exit Numbering Page 11 of 11