FECAL COLIFORM MONITORING IN GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY: SUMMARY REPORT OF MONITORING RESULTS FOR

Similar documents
CITY OF LYNDEN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT MARCH 1, 2016

Portland Water District Sebago Lake Monitoring Programs Lower Bay Bacteria Monitoring Presenting data from 1977 to 2018 Laurel Jackson

Water Quality Trends for Conscience Bay

Water Quality Trends for Patchogue Bay

ASSESSMENT OF FECAL COLIFORM IN LITTLE RABBIT CREEK AND LITTLE SURVIVAL CREEK

Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monitoring for the Sleepy Creek Watershed Incremental 319 Project Final Report

Tufts University Water: Systems, Science, and Society (WSSS) Program

Exploring Drivers of Fecal Coliform Pollution Trends in the Puget Sound. Washington Commercial Shellfish

Statistical Evaluation of BMP Effectiveness in Reducing Fecal Coliform Impairment in Mermentau River Basin

North Carolina Addendum Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Impaired Segments in the Dan River Watershed to Virginia TMDLs Approved by EPA Region 3

Bacteria Contamination of Surface Waters Due to Livestock Grazing in the Stanislaus National Forest, California (Second Year of Study)

FINAL Water Year 2012 Bacteria Sampling Report for the Klamath River Estuary

RE: PATAHA CREEK FECAL COLIFORM COMPLIANCE WITH WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA SUMMARY SHEET

Analysis of Indicator Bacteria in NJ Dead-end Lagoons. Michael Callaghan Gasbarro Mentor: Dr. Kathryn Goddard

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration, Bureau of Watershed Restoration

City of Peoria Clean Water Efforts. Governor s s Conference on the Management of the Illinois River October 4, 2007

Assessment of Pathogen Strategies

E. coli and Coliform Bacteria Levels of Edgewood s Watershed Katie Schneider and Leslie Reed

Figure 1. Overview map of Burrard Inlet, showing location of False Creek inlet.

LAKE HURON BEACH STUDY

Clean Ocean Access Water Quality Monitoring Summary Report

Loyalsock Creek Bacterial Coliforms. Presented By: Dr. Mel Zimmerman Clean Water Institute Lycoming College Matthew Bennett Jim Rogers

Lower St. Johns River Tributaries Fecal Coliform Basin Management Action Plan Jacksonville Environmental Symposium

Fecal Coliform TMDL for Strawberry Creek (WBID 2239)

Staff Report of Oakland Bay Activities 10/1/08 to 12/31/08. 1/15/09 Stephanie Kenny. Funded through Consolidated Contract # C14956

Meeting Agenda. Why are we here? Getting Started. Designated Uses. Water Quality Standards

Evaluation copy. Fecal Coliform. Computer INTRODUCTION

Total Coliform and Fecal Coliform TMDL for Lower Sweetwater Creek (WBID 1570A)

Whatcom County Water Quality Monitoring: Fecal Coliform Quality Assurance Project Plan

Pathogens and Grazing Livestock

Appendix G: Summary of Microbial Source Tracking Studies in Southern California

Oregon Department of Human Services HEALTH EFFECTS INFORMATION

DIDYMO SURVEY, LOWER FRYINGPAN RIVER, BASALT, COLORADO 2015

2015 Annual Water Report. City of Revelstoke Engineering and Public Works Department

Fourth Creek (Subbasin ) Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin North Carolina

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES TR: 95-02

Introduction. The System. Model Limitations, Assumptions, and Parameters. Optional Services Tech Memo

Fecal Coliform TMDL for Saint Joes Creek, WBID 1668A

Fecal and Total Coliform TMDL for Sparkman Branch (WBID 1561)

Land-Use and Water Quality Across the Cape Fear River Basin, NC: from 2001 to Jennifer Braswell Alford, PhD

Final Drainage Letter Pikes Peak Community College Downtown Parking Lot Colorado Springs, Colorado

The Mercer Island E. coli Event PNWS AWWA Spring Conference Bellevue Washington 2015

HEALTH CARE AGENCY PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. September 2016

Bacterial Quality of Crystalline Rock and Glacial Aquifers in New England

HEALTH CARE AGENCY PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. October 2012

Paul Sturm Roberto Viqueira Ríos

White Oak Creek. Recreational Use Attainability Analysis Summary of Findings. Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville, Texas

2005 Annual Ocean and Bay Water Quality Report

2006 Annual Ocean and Bay Water Quality Report

Fecal Coliforms Increase in a Storm Drain Fed Pond After Rain Events

Rainfall Appendix. Summary Statistics of Rainfall Data for Sites in the West-Central Florida. A Simple Conceptualized Rainfall/Discharge Relationship

Sampling for Microbial Analysis

WIFSS research on E. coli O157:H7 in central coastal California. Rob Atwill, D.V.M., Ph.D. University of California-Davis

Bioremediation of Oily Bilge Using BilgeRemed on board M/V Swift Arrow. Satya Ganti

GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation BSK Associates Vancouver

Hydrology Input for West Souris River IWMP

sources of the coliform bacteria in the lake Bohinjsko jezero

Recreational Use Attainability Analysis Summary of Findings & Public Comment

Chapter 3 PHYSICAL FEATURES

SF1363 / HF 1061: Legacy Funding; Conference Agreement

Some Historical Aspects of Urban Water Systems

Finding sources of fecal coliform bacteria in stormwater runoff

Long Pond Study

International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control Annual Report to the International Joint Commission

II. THE BOULDER CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

Gas Chromatographic Presumptive Test for Coliform Bacteria in Water

Drinking Water and Waste Management Among Members of the Temagami Lakes Association July 2014 Page 0

Hydrological study for the operation of Aposelemis reservoir Extended abstract

Aquatic Park, which is situated along the Berkeley shoreline (Figure 1, p. 126), can be a pleasant

Pr oject Summar y. Survey of the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on the surface of subprimal cuts of beef during winter months (Phase I)

MANAGING FRESHWATER INFLOWS TO ESTUARIES

Learning Styles: Visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and synthesis

International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control Annual Report to the International Joint Commission

International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control Annual Report to the International Joint Commission

INVESTIGATION OF NONPOINT POLLUTION SOURCES IMPACTING SHELLFISH GROWING AREAS IN TOMALES BAY,

Water quality monitoring and analysis of fecal coliform of Canadarago Lake tributaries and outlet

INTRODUCTION 250,000

Water quality assessment of Gilgit river, using fecal and total coliform as indicators

Fecal Coliform Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) - North Branch of the Sunrise River Final Report

HEALTH CARE AGENCY PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. September 2011

BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION OF WATER WELLS AND SPRINGS

Annual Report to the. International Joint Commission. from the. International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control for

rtc transit Before and After Studies for RTC Transit Boulder highway UPWP TASK Before Conditions

Total Maximum Daily Loads of Bacteria for Poquoson River and Back Creek in the City of Poquoson and in York County, Virginia

IDEXX Summary. D P Sartory and C Allaert Vandevenne

Mud Creek and West Mud Creek

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

COLILERT - WHAT'S AL THE FUSS ABOUT? Elizabeth Hanko. Elizabeth Hanko, Senior Consultant. AWT, Victoria

Agenda Report. Spruce Street Outlet Drainage Improvements Tower Road Relief Sewer

Predicting Flight Delays Using Data Mining Techniques

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

2007 Annual Ocean and Bay Water Quality Report

Duncan Hastie, P.E. Dewberry

The Casco Bay Estuary Partnership (CBEP, formerly the Casco

Environmental Impact Assessment in Chile, its application in the case of glaciers. Carlos Salazar Hydro21 Consultores Ltda.

Jamaica Member Report

Adapting water resource management in coastal areas A case study in Hai Phong, Vietnam

Transcription:

Chehalis Basin Partnership Fecal Coliform Monitoring in Grays Harbor County: Summary Report of Monitoring Results for 2000-2003 Draft June 30, 2003 Prepared by Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1917 First Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101-1027 In association with Triangle Associates 255 Colman Building 811 First Avenue Seattle, WA 98104

FECAL COLIFORM MONITORING IN GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY: SUMMARY REPORT OF MONITORING RESULTS FOR 2000-2003 DRAFT June 30, 2003 Prepared for: Chehalis Basin Partnership 100 W. Broadway, Suite 1 Montesano, WA 98563 Prepared by: Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1917 First Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1027 (206) 443-5300 In association with: Triangle Associates 255 Colman Building 811 First Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Project #2140067

Fecal Coliform Monitoring in Grays Harbor County: Summary Report of Monitoring Results for 2000-2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page No. Table of Contents... i List of Tables...ii Introduction... 1 Sampling Locations... 1 Sampling Protocol... 3 Sample Results for Chehalis Basin... 4 Humptulips River... 4 Satsop River... 5 Wynoochee River... 7 Conclusions... 10 References... 10 Appendices A. Sampling Data for Humptulips, Satsop and Wynoochee Rivers i

Chehalis Watershed Monitoring Plan Framework LIST OF TABLES No. Title Page No. 1 Humptulips River Sampling Locations... 1 2 Satsop River Sampling Locations... 2 3 Wynoochee River Sampling Locations... 2 4 Humptulips River Fecal Coliform Monitoring Data... 4 5 Satsop River Fecal Coliform Monitoring Data... 5 6 Wynoochee River Fecal Coliform Monitoring Data... 7 LIST OF FIGURES No. Title Page No. 1 Map of Sampling Location... 3 2 Fecal Coliform Results for Sites on the Humtulips River... 6 3 Fecal Coliform Results for Sites on the Satsop River... 8 4 Fecal Coliform Results for Sites on the Wynoochee River... 9 ii

1.0 INTRODUCTION Grays Harbor Conservation District (GHCD) has been monitoring fecal coliform in the Humptulips River, Satsop River, and Wynoochee River since January, 2001. These rivers are tributaries to Grays Harbor, which is on the 303(d) list for fecal coliform. A TMDL study completed for Grays Harbor indicates that fecal coliform pollution might be coming from the tributaries that feed into the harbor (Ecology, 2000). GHCD has conducted this monitoring to accomplish the following: to quantify the lower Chehalis/estuary Total Maximum Daily Load study, to isolate and identify the contaminant source, and to identify contributing land uses to the extent possible. Monitoring began in January 2001 and ended June 30, 2003. This report summarizes the monitoring data from that time period. SAMPLING LOCATIONS Tables 1, 2, 3 and Figure 1 illustrate the sampling locations on all three rivers. TABLE 1. HUMPTULIPS RIVER SAMPLING LOCATIONS Site Number Description Samples obtained from boat, bridge or shore Stream Reach 1 Mouth of river Boat T18N R11W S21 2 Highway 109 Bridge T18N R11W S15 3 Copalis crossing Bridge T19N R11W S33 4 Highway 101 Bridge T20N R10W S7 5 Donkey Cr. Bridge T21N R9W S21 1

Chehalis Watershed Monitoring Plan Framework TABLE 2. SATSOP RIVER SAMPLING LOCATIONS Site Number Description Samples obtained from boat, bridge or shore Stream Reach 1 Mouth of river Boat T17N R6W S7 0 Twin bridges Bridge T18N R7W S36 3 Bluff (east Satsop Rd, below Glicks) Shore T18N R7W S23 4 Below middle fork and west fork confluence Shore T18N R7W S23 5 Middle Fork Rd. bridge over west fork Bridge T18N R7W S14 6 Falco/Webster property Shore T18N R7W S12 7 Schmitz property at county line Shore T18N R6W S6 8 Beckwiths property Shore T19N R7W S25 9 Durbins property Shore T19N R7W S12 10 Cougar Smith Rd., middle fork bridge Bridge T20N R7W S35 11 Cougar Smith Rd., west fork bridge Bridge T20N R7W S33 TABLE 3. WYNOOCHEE RIVER SAMPLING LOCATIONS Site Number Description Samples obtained from boat, bridge or shore Stream Reach 1 Mouth of river Boat T17N R7W S18 2 Devonshire Rd Bridge T17N R8W S12 3 Geissler Rd Bridge T18N R8W S35 4 Wishkah cutoff Rd Bridge T18N R8W S5 5 Old white bridge Shore T19N R8W S28 2

CHEHALIS WATERSHED MONITORING PLAN FRAMEWORK Figure 1. Map of Sampling Locations SAMPLING PROTOCOL GHCD has developed a quality assurance project plan for this sampling project (GHCD, 2003). Fecal coliform samples were collected once a month at all sampling locations during normal flows. If a high water event occurred, a second sample was taken during that event. Samples were collected on Wednesdays or Thursdays on the 2 nd, 3 rd, or 4 th week of the month unless a high water event occurred during the first week of the month. Samples collected in areas influenced by the tide were collected during the last half of the ebb tide. Samples were collected from a boat, bridge or from the shore, approximately 6 to 8 inches below the water surface. Sampling procedures followed the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) procedures listed in the Field Sampling and Measurement Protocols (Ecology, 1993). Samples were scheduled to be delivered to the lab within 6 to 8 hours of collection. However, Ecology s sampling protocol allows for a maximum holding time of 30 hours if there are logistical constraints. Samples were collected directly into precleaned containers supplied by the lab and were placed on ice immediately after 3

Chehalis Watershed Monitoring Plan Framework sample collection. Grays Harbor County Environmental Health Lab analyzed all samples using Method SM 16-909C or SM9222D, the membrane filtration technique. The Multiple Tube Fermentation method, also referred to as the Most Probable Number (MPN) index, was used in addition to membrane filtration on some of the samples taken at the mouth of all three rivers. GHCD did not describe this analytical method in their Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), however GHCD may have decided to use both methods at these river mouth locations because the MPN method is more acceptable test method for analyzing fecal coliform in water that is higher in salinity, brackish, or turbid, which might have been the case at these sampling locations. SAMPLE RESULTS FOR CHEHALIS BASIN Humptulips River The Grays Harbor Conservation District monitored five sites on the Humptulips River from January 2001 to June 2003 for fecal coliform colonies (See Table 1 and Figure 1 for location of sites). No sampling occurred between July and December 2002. Table 4 presents a statistical summary of the Fecal Coliform monitoring data collected by the conservation district from 2001 2003 (Appendix A). Samples were collected monthly with most sites being sampled on the same day. However, site 1 for all three rivers, was typically sampled during a different day or week due to the need to sample these locations by boat. As shown, there were approximately 23 to 27 samples taken over the 18-month period, with the majority of the samples averaging between 11 and 17 colonies per 100mL. In turn, during the sampling period sites 2, 3, and 5 did record values over 100 colonies per 100mL (the geometric mean based on water quality standards for Class A waters). However, based on the notes provided with the raw data (Appendix A), some of these high values are thought to occur during periods of high precipitation. TABLE 4. HUMPTULIPS RIVER FECAL COLIFORM MONITORING DATA (Colonies per 100mL) Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Average 12 17 16 11 16 Maximum 44 136 125 76 186 Minimum 1 1 0 0 0 Standard Deviation 11 28 25 18 38 Number of Samples 23 27 27 27 27 Figure 2 provides a graphical summary of the monitoring data collected from the Humptulips River over the 18-month period. As shown the majority of the samples 4

CHEHALIS WATERSHED MONITORING PLAN FRAMEWORK were at or below 35 colonies per 100mL. However, there are two peaks in the graph occurring in the months of November 2001 and May 2002. Based on the sampling notes provided with the raw data (Appendix A), it is likely that the November 2001 peak was caused by a significant precipitation event during the month. In turn, the cause of the May 2002 peak is unknown. Satsop River The Grays Harbor Conservation District monitored eleven sites on the Satsop River from January 2001 to June 2003 for fecal coliform colonies (See Table 2 and Figure 1 for location of sites). No sampling occurred between July and December 2002. Table 5 presents a statistical summary of the Fecal Coliform monitoring data collected by the conservation district from 2001 2003 (Appendix A). Samples were collected monthly with most sites being sampled on the same day. However, site 1 for all three rivers, was typically sampled during a different day or week due to the need to sample these locations by boat. As shown, there were approximately 24 to 26 samples taken over the 18-month period, with the majority of the samples averaging between 10 and 14 colonies per 100mL. In turn, sites 10 and 11 collected samples with an average of 5 to 7 fecal coliform colonies per 100mL. Additionally, site 1 (Mouth of the Satsop River) collected, on average, 20 fecal coliform colonies per 100mL. Site 1 also collected the highest maximum value of 160 colonies per 100mL over the 18-month period, with site 8 recording the second highest maximum value of 100 colonies per 100mL. TABLE 5. SATSOP RIVER FECAL COLIFORM MONITORING DATA (COLONIES PER 100ML) Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Site 7 Site 8 Site 9 Site 10 Site 11 Average 20 10 10 11 13 11 13 14 11 7 5 Maximum 160 51 56 52 60 53 59 100 72 30 26 Minimum 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Standard Deviation 33 11 12 13 17 15 17 25 17 9 7 Number of Samples 24 26 26 26 26 25 26 25 26 26 26 5

200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Fecal Coliform Colonies (per 100 ml) for the Humptulips River (2001-2003) - Sites 1-5 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 6 01/24/01 01/31/01 02/14/01 02/15/01 03/15/01 03/21/01 04/18/01 04/19/01 05/23/01 05/31/01 06/14/01 07/16/01 07/19/01 08/15/01 08/20/01 09/06/01 09/10/01 09/18/01 09/25/01 10/01/01 10/09/01 11/06/01 11/14/01 11/20/01 11/27/01 12/04/01 12/10/01 12/18/01 12/26/01 01/09/02 01/15/02 02/14/02 02/19/02 03/11/02 03/18/02 04/03/02 04/22/02 05/07/02 05/28/02 06/04/02 06/10/02 06/11/02 07/01/02 08/01/02 09/01/02 10/01/02 11/01/02 12/01/02 01/01/03 01/13/03 01/14/03 01/21/03 02/25/03 03/25/03 03/31/03 04/15/03 05/12/03 06/10/03 6/17/2003 Fecal Coliform Colonies (per 100 ml) Date Figure 2. Fecal Coliform Results for Sites on the Humtulips River

CHEHALIS WATERSHED MONITORING PLAN FRAMEWORK Figure 3 provides a graphical summary of the monitoring data collected from the Satsop River over the 18-month period. As shown the majority of the samples were at or below 40 colonies per 100mL. However, there are four notable peaks in the graph occurring in the months of July-August 2001, March 2002, May of 2002, and June 2003, respectfully. It is unknown why these spikes occurred at these times. Wynoochee River The Grays Harbor Conservation District monitored five sites on the Satsop River from January 2001 to June 2003 for fecal coliform colonies (See Table 3 and Figure 1 for location of sites). No sampling occurred between July and December 2002. Table 6 presents a statistical summary of the Fecal Coliform monitoring data collected by the conservation district from 2001 2003 (Appendix A). Samples were collected monthly with most sites being sampled on the same day. However, site 1 for all three rivers, was typically sampled during a different day or week due to the need to sample these locations by boat. As shown, there were approximately 19 to 21 samples taken over the 18-month period, with the majority of the samples averaging between 17 and 23 colonies per 100mL. Additionally, site 5, which is the farthest upstream site, collected the highest maximum value of 119 colonies per 100mL over the 18-month period, with site 4 recording the second highest maximum value of 115 colonies per 100mL. TABLE 6. WYNOOCHEE RIVER FECAL COLIFORM MONITORING DATA (COLONIES PER 100ML) Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Average 19 23 21 17 18 Maximum 46 95 107 115 119 Minimum 2 0 0 0 0 Standard Deviation 14 24 27 28 29 Number of Samples 21 20 20 20 19 Figure 4 provides a graphical summary of the monitoring data collected from the Wynoochee River over the 18-month period. As shown the majority of the samples were at or below 30 colonies per 100mL. However, there are three notable peaks in the graph occurring in the months of September 2001, October 2001, and March 2003, respectfully. It is unknown why these spikes occurred at these times. 7

160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Fecal Coliform Colonies (per 100 ml) for the Satsop River (2001-2003) - Sites 1-11 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Site 7 Site 8 Site 9 Site 10 Site 11 20 10 0 8 01/25/01 01/31/01 02/14/01 02/22/01 03/14/01 03/21/01 04/14/01 04/18/01 05/21/01 05/31/01 06/25/01 06/25/01 07/12/01 07/16/01 08/01/01 08/20/01 09/04/01 09/10/01 09/20/01 09/25/01 10/04/01 10/09/01 11/08/01 11/20/01 11/27/01 12/10/01 12/12/01 12/18/01 12/27/01 01/15/02 01/16/02 02/13/02 02/19/02 03/18/02 03/27/02 04/17/02 04/22/02 05/07/02 05/22/02 06/10/02 06/12/02 06/13/02 07/01/02 08/01/02 09/01/02 10/01/02 11/01/02 12/01/02 01/01/03 01/07/03 01/08/03 01/21/03 02/11/03 03/04/03 03/31/03 04/14/03 05/05/03 06/04/03 06/10/03 Fecal Coliform Colonies (per 100 ml) Date Figure 3. Fecal Coliform Results for Sites on the Satsop River

130 120 Fecal Coliform Colonies (per 100 ml) for the Wynoochee River (2001-2003) - Sites 1-5 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 20 10 0 9 07/16/01 07/19/01 08/16/01 08/20/01 09/10/01 09/13/01 09/25/01 09/27/01 10/09/01 10/10/01 11/15/01 11/20/01 11/27/01 12/10/01 12/13/01 12/18/01 12/20/01 01/07/02 01/15/02 02/19/02 02/27/02 03/18/02 03/20/02 04/22/02 04/24/02 05/07/02 05/09/02 06/10/02 06/18/02 06/19/02 07/01/02 08/01/02 09/01/02 10/01/02 11/01/02 12/01/02 01/01/03 01/14/03 01/15/03 01/21/03 02/18/03 02/24/03 03/26/03 03/31/03 04/22/03 04/28/03 05/19/03 05/27/03 06/10/03 06/11/03 Fecal Coliform Colonies (per 100 ml) Date Figure 4. Fecal Coliform Results for Sites on the Wynoochee River

Chehalis Watershed Monitoring Plan Framework CONCLUSIONS Ecology s study on fecal coliform pollution in Grays Harbor indicates that 96 percent of fecal coliform in the Grays Harbor watershed is coming from non-point source pollution. Non-point source pollution is pollution that is not necessarily discharged through a pipe or an outfall. Non-point source pollution can result from failing pumping stations of sewage collection systems, failing home septic systems, flooding, animal-waste run-off from agricultural operations or areas used by wildlife. Nonpoint source pollution typically enters the receiving water during rainfall events and can be better detected through storm water sampling than sampling during ambient conditions. Only two sets of samples during the monitoring period were described as being collected during a rainfall event. Those sets were for the Humptulips River and Wynoochee River, and were collected on November 14, 2001 and November 15, 2001, respectively. The City of Montesano accumulated 3.21 inches of rainfall on November 13 and 2.51 inches of rainfall on November 15. These were also some of the highest fecal coliform monitoring results recorded during the three-year monitoring period for these two rivers. Overall, bacterial levels are low in all three streams monitored, with no significant pattern detected among the sampling locations within each stream. No significant trends are seen in the data. Some of the higher levels of fecal coliform detected might be attributed to runoff that occurs during rainfall events. Bacteria levels from non-point sources in these rivers may be low because of the best management practices that have been implemented for animal management and on-site sewage systems, as well as urban storm water controls (Ecology, 2000). REFERENCES Grays Harbor Conservation District. 2003. Quality Assurance Project Plan. Ecology. 1993. Field Sampling and Measurement Protocols for the Watershed Assessment Section. Publication No. 93-e04. November, 1993. Ecology. 2000. Grays Harbor Fecal Coliform Total Maximum Daily Load Study. Publication No. 00-03-020. June 2000. 10

APPENDIX A. SAMPLING DATA FOR HUMPTULIPS, SATSOP AND WYNOOCHEE RIVERS

Humptulips River Data (Fecal Coliform Colonies per 100mL) Date Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 01/24/01 4 8 4 3 01/31/01 16 02/14/01 5 02/15/01 1 2 1 5 03/15/01 4 10 9 9 03/21/01 3 04/18/01 9 04/19/01 4 2 1 1 05/23/01 15 5 0 2 05/31/01 6 06/14/01 11 16 12 5 07/16/01 19 07/19/01 20 22 19 6 08/15/01 11 36 24 42 08/20/01 28 09/06/01 29 11 12 9 09/10/01 11 09/18/01 11 23 14 8 09/25/01 21 10/01/01 10 20 17 26 10/09/01 18 11/06/01 9 3 7 9 *11/14/01 136 125 57 79 **11/20/01 44 11/27/01 2 12/04/01 9 7 2 4 12/10/01 11 12/18/01 17 12/26/01 13 7 1 0 01/09/02 12 9 3 8 01/15/02 5 02/14/02 2 0 0 1 02/19/02 4 03/11/02 25 34 23 20 03/18/02 1 04/03/02 4 3 0 0 04/22/02 4 05/07/02 8 05/28/02 65 24 76 186 06/04/02 13 2 13 5 06/10/02 3 01/14/03 1 5 2 2 01/21/03 3 02/25/03 1 3 0 0 03/25/03 3 1 0 0 03/31/03 4 04/15/03 2 2 1 1 05/12/03 6 3 0 0 06/10/03 24 06/17/03 48 36 5 6 *11/13/01 Montesano received 3.29 inches of rain in 24 hours *11/14/01 Montesano received 2.51 inches of rain in 24 hours **11/19/01 Montesano received 1.16 inches of rain in 24 hours

Satsop River Data (Fecal Coliform Colonies per 100mL) Date Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Site 7 Site 8 Site 9 Site 10 Site 11 01/25/01 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 01/31/01 9 02/14/01 2 02/22/01 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 03/14/01 2 4 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 0 03/21/01 6 04/14/01 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 46 2 2 04/18/01 5 05/21/01 7 6 3 4 3 5 3 2 1 1 05/31/01 8 06/25/01 51 56 52 60 37 59 49 26 23 26 06/25/01 31 07/12/01 23 15 21 26 13 44 46 29 17 16 07/16/01 12 08/01/01 11 12 16 13 9 36 100 16 18 7 08/20/01 29 09/04/01 32 23 25 39 13 31 19 21 30 20 09/10/01 16 09/20/01 20 21 18 28 47 30 24 14 7 8 09/25/01 20 10/04/01 14 16 21 18 32 23 9 6 7 10/09/01 19 11/08/01 12 7 10 10 6 11 8 5 12 2 11/20/01 23 11/27/01 19 12/10/01 6 12/12/01 5 7 4 5 11 4 6 6 7 3 12/18/01 8 12/27/01 5 5 4 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 01/15/02 0 01/16/02 2 3 0 4 4 3 4 3 1 02/13/02 2 1 5 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 02/19/02 8 03/18/02 64 03/27/02 2 2 1 3 5 2 0 1 1 0 04/17/02 4 6 12 1 4 2 2 2 0 0 04/22/02 9 05/07/02 2 05/22/02 11 27 39 60 5 2 1 0 0 0 06/10/02 5 06/12/02 16 15 12 13 8 5 8 7 26 3 01/08/03 6 3 4 2 5 3 1 0 3 3 01/21/03 3 02/11/03 3 2 2 2 3 5 4 4 0 0 03/04/03 3 3 3 8 5 2 1 0 0 0 03/31/03 21 04/14/03 10 2 6 0 3 5 2 2 0 4 05/05/03 6 9 9 9 4 8 4 5 1 6 06/04/03 10 16 11 14 53 47 61 72 11 8 06/10/03 160

Wynoochee River Data (Fecal Coliform Colonies per 100mL) Date Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 07/16/01 32 07/19/01 23 6 4 7 08/16/01 24 22 21 24 08/20/01 26 09/10/01 34 09/13/01 29 32 27 19 09/25/01 42 09/27/01 45 35 115 119 10/09/01 31 10/10/01 26 36 49 *11/15/01 95 107 46 59 11/20/01 18 11/27/01 6 12/10/01 14 12/13/01 68 0 31 41 12/18/01 19 12/20/01 6 11 6 12 01/07/02 0 0 0 0 01/15/02 3 02/19/02 46 02/27/02 1 4 0 3 03/18/02 2 03/20/02 0 5 0 0 04/22/02 19 04/24/02 5 2 0 1 05/07/02 13 05/09/02 13 8 3 1 06/10/02 13 06/18/02 16 30 11 28 01/15/03 10 5 3 7 01/21/03 2 02/18/03 2 7 7 2 1 02/24/03 2 03/26/03 37 71 5 4 03/31/03 13 04/22/03 16 13 1 0 04/28/03 7 05/19/03 4 5 2 3 05/27/03 13 06/10/03 35 06/11/03 27 20 15 13 Montesano received 3.29 inches of *11/13/01 rain in 24 hours Montesano received 2.51 inches of *11/14/01 rain in 24 hours